This Could Be The Next Big Case
Вставка
- Опубліковано 9 лют 2025
- #lawsuit #supremecourt #gunrights
So-called “assault weapon” bans are passing in blue states nationwide. From Illinois to Washington State, anti-gun jurisdictions are violating the Constitution.
Thanks to our lawsuit in the Seventh Circuit, where we’re fighting Illinois’ unconstitutional ban on semi-automatic rifles, the Supreme Court may finally be ready and willing to take up an assault weapons ban case.
Today on Law & Ammo, we’re going to talk about a case that GOA has recently supported with a petition for certiorari, Snope v. Brown, which is challenging Maryland’s unconstitutional ban on certain semi-automatic firearms.
Join GOA: donate.gunowne...
Like on Facebook: / gunowners
Follow on Instagram: / gunownersofamerica
Follow on Twitter: / gunowners
This Could Be The Next Big Case
Constitutional carry in all 50 states!
It’s crazy how we have to ask for constitutional carry it’s supposed to be constitutional everywhere it’s the 2nd amendment in the constitution.
And territories and the District of Columbia.
Thank your local law enforcement for upholding unconstitutional laws
@@BryanCinemasyup!
Name any other Constitutional right that changes at state lines. 🤔
So the guns we use in the military, to defend our country and our constitution, aren't protected by the constitution? Make it make sense
I agree
Sure, let me use smoke and mirrors. 😉
Well first off the military isn’t going to defend the country. In fact they haven’t defended the country since the revolution. The standing army has been involved in one conflict after the next but all for stock points for the sitting members of Congress. The founders were all against having a standing army as they knew at some point it would be turned on the people. Secondly, the US was turned into a corporation in the late 1800s. That’s why you are seeing an open degradation of your rights, the military is not your friend. The thin blue line isn’t your friend either. They take an “oath” but in reality it’s just a ceremonial statement to make you believe that they serve you. They don’t.
Leftists haven't bothered even trying to make sense in a decade. They understand that half the country will go along with whatever insanity they spout and lap up all the lies no matter how detached they are from reality.
Look at the Democrat political ads. Ad after ad that is literally attacking Republicans over complete nonsense. Shit that isn't even true. Lie after lie. But they don't care because they know Democrats will believe anything they want to believe.
It doesn't. But the left requires people to be stupid.
I'm a gun owner and I vote!
Thanks for the Support!
Me too!
Rights delayed
Are
Rights denied !
Nowhere in the second amendment does it say you cannot own military weapons!!!!!
What it does say “shall not infringe”!!!!!!
And when the second amendment was written, the people and military had the same weapons!!!!!!!
And history shows that American private citizens were allowed to possess the same kinds of weapons that the military did. The Founders did not prohibit muskets or the long rifle or even cannons. And when higher-capacity, faster rate-of-fire weapons came online, the Union didn't prohibit those either.
Actually at that time civilians had many weapons the military did not, including far superior rifles.
45 ACP and 45-70 Government both began as Government military calibers
That is likely due to the fact I am not getting you a weapon and also not trying to arm 100+ and many more with weapons. So you might buy a500-2000 dollar item per item. The government wants to pay 500$ and tell you that it's good to go and be mosly true. Civilians will likely want the best of that can be had. A little hyperbolic but I hope to have articulated this properly.@@finngamesknudson1457
The people had better and more accurate weapons than the military
I registered for the first time this year. I could not stand on the sidelines anymore. I also joined GOA, it just that important.
This is why I send GOA money every month. They get out there and get after it
VOTE! VOTE! VOTE!!!!
I sure hope so.
Quit calling them assault weapons
In legal terms, assault is a crime that involves threatening or attempting to cause physical harm to another person.
Assault Weapons in state possession are called
DUTY RIFLES
Assaults Weapons in civilian possession are called
ASSAULT WEAPONS
GUN LAWS
POLICE are EXEMPT
SLAVES are REGULATED
FAKE MADE UP LEFT WING WORD OF FEAR!
There is no such thing as a military restriction on civilian arms. The following has been used in war: flintlocks, muskets, air rifles, Gatling guns, bolt actions, semi-automatic handguns and rifles. Are we banned from using these weapons?
Amen.
Go get it done.
All they did was file an Amicus brief.
Big deal 😔
Support those who support you! Thanks for all that you do GOA!
US v. Miller (1939) held that sawed-off shotguns were not protected by A2A because they allegedly weren't connected to military or militia duty.
But assault weapons bans hold that semiauto rifles are not protected by A2A because they are too connected to military duty!
They're arguing both sides of the fence!
When the Congress wrote A14A which requires the states to honor the same civil rights as the feds, the amendment authors did not differentiate between the various rights and different levels of scrutiny as to their enforcement. They treated all the rights as fundamental. So all the rights should be afforded strict scrutiny, period.
But racist white Southern Democrat people wanted wiggle room to get out of honoring some of the rights of black former slaves, so they made up the whole multi-level scheme of different kinds of scrutiny out of whole cloth. This lead to states picking and choosing which rights they considered fundamental enough for them to have to honor. And A2A just didn't rate, in their eyes. And after Reconstruction had worn on for awhile, it didn't rate with SCOTUS, either.
The courts have historically treated A2A and our RKBA like a little ugly orphan stepchild. But the writers of the Constitution and the BOR sure didn't. The RKBA is a fundamental right and must be protected against any and all government encroachment. That's how it was originally written into A2A, and how it was reiterated by the authors of A14A.
They frequently do this. In fact there’s 2 different suppressors cases one in Texas and one in Illinois which they are doing exactly that. One argues that suppressors are bearable arms and thus subject to NFA regulations, the other argues that they aren’t bearable arms and thus subject to NFA regulation lol..
Except that short barreled shotguns do have military use and have been used in the military and semi-auto only rifles largely have not. So they both argued the wrong thing. The whole military weapon thing is kind of irrelevant. My fist is a military weapon.
In legal terms, assault is a crime that involves threatening or attempting to cause physical harm to another person.
Assault Weapons in state possession are called
DUTY RIFLES
Assaults Weapons in civilian possession are called
ASSAULT WEAPONS
GUN LAWS
POLICE are EXEMPT
SLAVES are REGULATED
I like to ask for an example of a weapon that has not been used in war.
Playing the shell game with GOD GIVEN RIGHTS.
Fingers crossed we get "Assault weapons" back. It's ban was unconstitutional as well as the ban on magazine size and automatic weapons. We just got out of a war with England at the time, the second amendment wasn't for hunting or self defense. It was to ensure that the people were armed to fight just in case. Be it against invasion or tyrannical governments.
Yeah, that second part? that's what the government is afraid of.
@GunsAndFishingU.S.A.our current military isn't well trained nor disciplined because of DEI and the alphabet peeps! If SHTF, you will be very surprised just how fast and coordinated the patriotic American citizens will unite! Our government and military thought the same thing about the Taliban!
People in militas definitely. Individual citizens with no obligation to serve if needed, absolutely not!
@GunsAndFishingU.S.A. they could go into each home like a swat team. Do you think the typical gun owner could defend against a siege?
@GunsAndFishingU.S.A. And you think you can defend your home against that type of force by yourself?
The State of Washington needs you GOA! Where are you?
Tell these communists to read the #2A and weep.
If you bring up "shall not be infringed" around liberals the first thing they will say is "well regulated" like it's some big gotcha even though the SC has gone over this a million times.
@@__K__B__ Yup. The fools don't understand that well regulated in today's terms mean well trained. I don't even engage with the fools anymore. My response to anything they say is always the same. Read the #2A and weep.
@@__K__B__Before 2008 the SC agreed the 2nd amendment did not grant individual citizens the right to carry.
@@techsupport891 Read the #2A and weep.
@@SafetySal I have, and it's pretty clear the founders where talking about a armed group capable of mounting an adequate defense against an invading force.
Vote 🗳️
Infuriating. The right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. Are these weapons under scrutiny, arms? Are they in common use? Since these statements are true under any definition, Maryland is deliberately defying not just SCOTUS, but the Constitution itself.
S.O.S. from Massachusetts
Good luck Democrats winning the presidency there's no chance
Keep fighting for our rights y'all!!
Vote Red
If you allow them to call a Civil Defense Weapon Ban, an Assault Weapon Ban, you've already conceded the argument.
Registered to vote at 18,voted in every local, state, and federal election since,just turned 60,been a GOA life member over 20 years 🇺🇸
Sir, you are 100% correct!!! Get out and vote!!! We in Connecticut lost our semiautomatic rifles, required to register them, and standard capacity magazines in 2014 and then we lost the work around called the others, our ability to open carry, and we were required to register our others in 2023. Folks get out to vote if you want your rights.
What does your ability to open carry have to do with defending against tyrannical government/ invading military?
Rocks were weapons of war too, yet rocks are not being banned.
Don't give those communist bastards any ideas.
Pocket sand!
SCOTUS, Please take up the assault weapon ban. I have been waiting 40 years for this.
Are you a member of a milita?
@eaglestryker1338 The constitution doesn't say one of the people. What type of defense is one person supposed to mount against an organized invading force?
@eaglestryker1338 It literally states the purpose “in defense of a free state”.
Let me uncomplicated it. Shall not infringe or get disbarred.
Good luck
I believe SCOTUS will take the case, and that they will rule in favor of our right to all bearable arms.
And then you can protect us from the tyrannical government and the most powerful military to ever exist?
We need national reciprocity of constitutional carry too happen.
If states have to honor one another's state gay marriage licenses, then you're damn straight the states should have to honor the US Constitutional rights of each other's citizens.
Lets hope the law suit goes right, no liicenses needed shall not be registerd, and all semi autos bans are unconstitutional.
Every weapon used in war has also been used by civilians, and in some instances at the same time, "STARTING WITH ROCKS"!!!
Amendment II
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
Yes,there is no reason not to. The case in the 4th district is complete, so it should take up this case before any other.
Shall not be infringed,and they are infringing on our 2nd amendment all over the country
Vote Red and for Trump
The RINOS won't help.
Do the courts know that civilians and military possessed the same weapons at the writing of the 2A?
Non violent felons need there gun rights bk
SCOTUS need to resolve this once and for all. These circuit courts need to be punished for their blatant disregard of the SCOTUS, the 2nd amendment and the constitution. There are quite a few judges that need to be severely censured.
Anything used to cause harm can be construed as an assault weapon. Assault is an action not an object.
They should take the case and answer why we have had a right to own many semi auto guns for decades before all this ban the ar crap started,because they are arms allowed for the public for decades
Over a century, actually.
Wyoming wants to say Thanks for all GOA does to defend Rights that read Shall Not Be INFRINGED!
It is not only rifles that are banned but many handguns as well and magazines
fingers crossed
Weapons of war are the weapons that the 2nd amendment was all about. To say these weapons are not covered is an erroneous statement . These weapons are exactly what the 2nd ammendment is all about.
The most frustrating thing is.I do not need to ask my employees for permission To do anything we are the supreme power they work for us
All gun owners and republicans need to go out and vote. No excuses, or we will lose.
Defund gun control!!! MAGA Arkansas!
Shall not be infringed wasn't a suggestion.
Apparently "shall not be infringed" is still too difficult to comprehend; good luck with the case!
Not to be fucked with, period. It’s rite there in the 2nd!!! 😡😡😡🤬
As an Illinois citizen I appreciate your guy’s work
It's about time. Our rights are being attacked daily.
All I know ,is that before and after the drafting of our Bill of Rights, the people had the same weapons that the military had, and that right was protected. So what has changed? Our constitution tells the government that the people have the right to bear arms, but the government says "we will tell you what arms you can bear".
What more can the Supreme Court do? They have already ruled that cases had to be decided based on historical means testing...No one is following that ruling. So, what difference will more rulings make? Just more rulings to be NOT followed is all. If I were a Supreme Court Justice I may consider not taking any more of these cases.
I love how you guys never compromise!
Good lets go Supreme court justice
You are absolutely correct 💯%
All my friends are registered to vote.
Humans have a natural-born right to self-defense. By logical extension we then have the right to "keep & bear" the implement(s) of our choosing to effect that defense. Any laws, rules, regulations which interfere with that right is destructive of our rights.
ALL GUN OWNERS SHOULD BE VOTING! What The Heck is Wrong with These Gun Owners? 🤔🤔🤔
Trump Vance 2024 🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲💪✊✊✊ make America great again
Trump banned bump stocks and put red flag laws on the national scene. Voting for Trump will not bring back gun rights. People vote themselves in to communism but have to shoot their way out.
“Take the guns first, go through due process second”- Trump
No Founder, nor any contemporary to any Founder, ever recognized separate categories for civilian and military weapons.
🤩 come on Maryland , stop trying to deny me my rights
The 2nd amendment was never for self defence and the fire arms the military had was the same as the people had and the 2a was for a tyranical gov and being invaded by other countrys
I believe that the supreme Court will hear the case.
Yes
I wish I could own actual assault weapon as defined by the army.
I hear this every week for the past 5 years.
I'll tell you why they will take the case. Because they already GVR'd the case and the 4th circuit thumbed their collective noses at the supreme court!
The various bar associations across the country need to start disbarring attorney legislators who for forward law that is unconstitutional. Writing unconstitutional laws is in no state’s charter.
Voting is open in many states now. GO VOTE NOW. TODAY. 🇺🇸
“Like an M-16 does not mean it’s an M-16 🤦♂️
🎯 GOA
At some point in time the common man in this country will give up discussing this issue after so much abuse and prepare himself to confront government officials on the battlefield. There is no way to predict what will spark the confrontation, when this event will take place, where it will take place, or what the endgame will be. However, once such a confrontation is sparked, I suspect the common man will not be mollified until this country is scoured of its enemies so he does not have to return to the field anytime soon.
I'm with ya" The "thank you" phone call I got means a lot!
Its high time!
I'll believe it when it happens...
You should be able to own anything you want
Scary looking semiautomatic weapon ban
Massachusetts here We need help.
The supreme Court needs to take this up immediately also grant us our second amendment rights and throw out any FOID cards and the like
I think the Supreme Court like congress is more concerned about how much time they get to spend on the beach !
B.S. The Court has done nothing to indicate that they are ready to take an AWB case.
Intermediate and strict scrutiny should be unconstitutional for ALL constitutional rights, including both 1A and 2A.
No arms ban, or limitation on the keeping and bearing of arms, is in keeping with the text of 2A.
Differentiation between military and civilian arms is a historically very recent thing.
First, the sec. amen. was to ensure that we the people have all the weapons the government has, should we need to protect our rights and country against tyranny. I do believe scotus will take this case up.
Assault weapon is the mouth of a garbage spewing, word vomiting Karen or the other is toilet paper.
Sure hope the Scotus takes the case and rules on it the way the constitution was meant. We'll keep our eyes on this and fingers crossed.
Can you shed some light on the latest status of the Engaged in the Business rule? I am a GOA member. Will Congress or GOA need to do something to reverse the new rule and definitions given Chevron Deference was found unconstitutional?
I hope to live long enough to see my 2nd amendment restored….. the judicial process for constitutional related lawsuits needs to undergo a faster process than other non-constitutional cases!
To answer the question of will it end, the answer is no.
I was able to get about 64 of my friends who are all gun owners to go and vote for the Republican party we're voting for Trump. To the anti-gunners that don't like this choice well sorry we can't help you.
They act like this is been the away for 200 years not 20 or 30 years f*** that down with the NFA
So it is true
Hard to believe it’s taken ten years to get the case to this point.
The 2nd amendment does not say the right to keep and bear arms in common use, it says the he right to keep and bear arms.
Bring back the 1994 federal ban. Nobody needs to own an assault weapon.
By 1812, American Citizens were freely able to purchase and own the 1792 Chambers flintlock machinegun, which had evolved to have a 224 round magazine capacity. therefore the NFA itself is Unconstitutional
They're not going to touch it it's too hot for them in this political turmoil
Supreme Court needs to take up the case. Weapons of war over the years and even today will forever change and are never what they seem. A rock, a vehicle, anything and everything can be used as a weapon of war, and in self defence. The fact that they want to limit a civilians access to firearms is only a stepping stone to removing all firearms. I'd be willing to be the individuals protecting those judges who ruled the banable will be carrying those banned weapons
A friend goy a ballot from NewYork ,he hasn’t lived there for 26 years ,vote DJT !!!