Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.

The Philosophy of Humor: What Makes Something Funny?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 10 січ 2023
  • let's talk about The Philosophy of Humor. in this animated video our host Chris A. Kramer talks about what makes something funny. we explore some theories about humor including: the superiority theory of humor, the relief theory of humor and the incongruity theory of humor.
    #philosophy #humor
    ★★★ TIMESTAMPS ★★★
    ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
    00:18 The Superiority Theory of Humor
    02:00 The Relief Theory of Humor
    03:13 The Incongruity Theory of Humor
    Thank you for watching this animated summary of "The Philosophy of Humor"
    Please subscribe to my channel 🚂✔️: / @trainofthoughts
    About the Author
    ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
    Chris Kramer is an Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Santa Barbara City College. His interests intersect across the philosophy of humor, mind, religion, informal logic, existentialism and phenomenology, and oppression. He wrote his dissertation on “Subversive Humor,” half about humor, half about oppression. Readers will laugh and cry, but mostly cry, mostly because they are reading a Ph.D. dissertation: what has become of their lives?
    sbcc.academia....
    Source:
    ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
    this Essay ""The Philosophy of Humor: What Makes Something Funny?" was published first on 1000wordphilosophy website in which You can find this essay along with other philosophical essays :
    1000wordphilos...
    HOW CAN YOU SUPPORT ME?
    ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
    Currently, I work on multiple projects as a freelance motion designer. Your support will make it possible for me to just work on this channel and do what I love the most, creating high-quality videos for you. It would be a pleasure if you support me!
    Patreon 🚂 : / trainofthoughts

КОМЕНТАРІ • 16

  • @TrainOfThoughts
    @TrainOfThoughts  10 місяців тому +1

    🔴 WATCH ALSO:
    🎥 VIDEO: Videogames and Philosophy: ua-cam.com/video/o65d3K1oR6M/v-deo.html
    🎥 LIST: Aesthetics and Philosophy of Art: ua-cam.com/play/PL9VM4k4nsCkyADQzQg3pzRXc4vPrcWEUC.html

  • @samstits8982
    @samstits8982 3 місяці тому +1

    That finger joke killed me

  • @MoonKnightZA
    @MoonKnightZA Рік тому +5

    These videos are incredibly well made, I love it!

  • @crackedpince-nez131
    @crackedpince-nez131 7 місяців тому +2

    I’m looking forward to a seeing where this channel goes - well done!

  • @jayadeviairee533
    @jayadeviairee533 10 місяців тому +2

    It's funny I didn't check the sub count earlier, after watching the video I was expecting this to be a big channel with lots of subs.

    • @TrainOfThoughts
      @TrainOfThoughts  10 місяців тому +1

      that's the Incongruity Theory of Humor! 😜
      thanks man!

    • @jayadeviairee533
      @jayadeviairee533 9 місяців тому +1

      @@TrainOfThoughts yesss!

  • @wisastra
    @wisastra Рік тому +2

    3:32

  • @HamidSsss-h3r
    @HamidSsss-h3r 14 днів тому

    ببینید شوخی و آزار بعضی موقع ها بد نیست ولی باید بلد باشیم چه طور .کی؟ با کی و د ر هر پدیده ای باید یا کلا قبول کنیم یا اصلا یا بعضی چیز هایش را که بستگی دارد و باید بلد باشیم چی میخواهیم و شخصیت شناس و چهره شناس باشیم

  • @ThisHandle444
    @ThisHandle444 4 місяці тому +1

    I know this retired crazy ol sailor that went from deathrow, to stairway to heaven then onto pretty much almost kind of there. Almost. With humor.

  • @brackish7271
    @brackish7271 4 місяці тому +1

    the narration is soothing and smooth but the sound effects ruin it for me

  • @louithrottler
    @louithrottler 10 місяців тому +1

    The lowest form of humoUr is reddit/3am jokes
    ,,,and oddly enough I've submitted the most terrible jokes :|

  • @ChristopherGontar
    @ChristopherGontar 7 місяців тому

    These erroneous presentations on this topic can't keep being made forever. Eventually, the charade must end. Academe and the public will recognize that I solved this problem over ten years ago. It is hardly possible to believe that the creators here are unaware of my work in this area. I've taken every possible step to ensure it is widely known.
    Also, let's suppose you agree that the superiority and relief theories are irrelevant, or category mistakes, that they confuse an extraneous factor with humor itself -- as a few academics rightly point out. Then why do you then go back and suggest that they still contain value, that the better theory could be assembled by combining them? If they're completely false as descriptions of what humor is in itself, then they have no value in the way they are intended.