How 2001 Uses György Ligeti's Music

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 6 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 120

  • @AlanCanon2222
    @AlanCanon2222 2 роки тому +38

    I had the privilege of meeting György Ligeti when I was a young string bass player of about 17. He came to the University of Louisville to accept the Grawemeyer Award for composition. In the program notes he mentioned his love of Lewis Carroll and the works of Douglas R. Hofstadter and Benoit Mandelbrot. I approached him after the concert in his honor (Atmospheres was performed, along with the piece he'd won the prize for) and told him that I'd made myself listen to his music on the 2001 soundtrack as a child, long before I got to see the movie, and that his music fascinated and terrified me. Herr Ligeti kept nodding. I finished by saying, "There is Godel, Escher, and Bach, and then there is Hofstadter, Mandelbrot, and Ligeti." György Ligeti took my young hand in both of his, beamed, and said, "Oh! It is a very kind compliment that you have paid me!" I think he left my hometown of Louisville stoked that at least one person at the concert "got" his music.

    • @Rigpasword
      @Rigpasword 11 місяців тому +2

      Wow, cool story, and what a privilege to have met the maestro in person. Your compliment to him was perfect and his response showed he knew that you got what his music is about. I feel privileged to know well the work of all the people you mention, from Herr Bach to Herr Ligeti - each one has been an important teacher in my life.

  • @andygalligan4184
    @andygalligan4184 4 роки тому +106

    I always took the black screen opening to *be* the monolith, presented first to the viewer as the interdimensional passageway of cinema. Excellent breakdown!

    • @jonathanfinney7821
      @jonathanfinney7821 3 роки тому +5

      Your comment itself is for me a revelation.

    • @Parmetheus
      @Parmetheus 2 роки тому +1

      Now that's an interesting idea 💡

    • @rajeshi4
      @rajeshi4 Рік тому

      Wow that actually makes sense why there was black screen at the start! First time when I saw the film, I was so confused seeing that

  • @vikashdenzil
    @vikashdenzil 5 років тому +160

    I'm on a binge watch session on your channel. Amazing stuff.

    • @ListeningIn
      @ListeningIn  5 років тому +12

      Thank you! Glad you’re enjoying them. Lots more to come.

    • @oceanmachine1906
      @oceanmachine1906 4 роки тому +3

      Same

    • @eXquisiteGaming110
      @eXquisiteGaming110 3 роки тому +2

      Currently doing the same, this channel is absolutely incredible!

    • @netopir3804
      @netopir3804 3 роки тому

      So do I. Started with Radiohead’s Bond theme. So much to discover: Thank you!

  • @Tantacrul
    @Tantacrul 5 років тому +71

    Great stuff! One thing I've always loved about the Stargate sequence is how the visuals progressively become more abstract over time, hitting a crescendo of 'abstractness' and then subsiding again: first we're looking at 'real' footage (of space and a closeup of Bowman's eye). Then the footage of Bowman becomes frozen and highly colour-treated. The footage of space is replaced with Douglas Trumbull's split-scan technique until there is nothing left that we could ever see in reality. I couldn't help but notice (because of this video) that the vocal effects end when the abstract visuals really kick off and are replaced with instrumental music. Then, as you say, when the sequence is over and we're back in a recognisable room, we're hearing voices again (albeit much stranger). All you can do is marvel at the amount of layers he's manipulating that end up complementing each other. His attention to detail was phenomenal.

    • @ListeningIn
      @ListeningIn  5 років тому +5

      Thank you! You really could do a whole video about the Stargate sequence. It's a very interesting point about the development of the abstract elements. But wow would you consider the footage of what looks like a landscape? Is that still further abstraction, as it's not completely clear what it's representing?

    • @Tantacrul
      @Tantacrul 5 років тому +4

      @@ListeningIn Yeah - I guess there are two ways of thinking about abstraction here. There's the ultimate meaning, which is pretty abstract and unknowable. But in terms of visual intensity, I think the penultimate sequence in the room is visually less abstract than the split scan technique (especially the moment with the 7 diamonds) mainly because it's made up of real/concrete things and exists in a space that at least obeys some rules... like gravity :)
      I suppose practicality comes into play here - it would have been nearly impossible to show Bowman getting old / witnessing his own death without real world props (like a room, bed etc.). I'd say they probably realised that they wouldn't be able to get that idea across if the whole thing look like a Kandinsky painting! However, if they simply jumped from the 7 mad looking diamonds to Bowman in a room, it would have been really jarring, so I think the landscape footage and the reintroduction of movement to Bowman (who is frozen up to that point) acts as a nice bridge to bring us back to more concrete visual material. Anyway, that aside, loved this video (and others)

    • @ListeningIn
      @ListeningIn  5 років тому +3

      That's a really good point. It would have been jarring without the landscape. And you're right that the level of visual abstraction going on is reduced as you go into the bedroom. But maybe the contrast was required in order to emphasise the complete dissolving of meaning in the final scenes? I agree that it wouldn't have worked as well if it looked like a Kandinsky (although it would have been awesome in its own way!).

    • @Tantacrul
      @Tantacrul 5 років тому +4

      @@ListeningIn I'd love to be able to quiz Kubrick about this. I wonder whether he tried some odd visual metaphors first (something like Bowman dissolving into a million particles) and then landed on the idea of the room later on. As you say - it's obviously completely out there in its own right. It looks like a normal enough place until you realise that time doesn't really exist and Bowman is able to witness his own death. I guess those concepts are much more jarring because they take place in a framework we understand. Knowing Kubrick, there were probably 75 completely different variations. I wish he'd return as a little baby man and help us clear this up.

    • @HAL--gb6uf
      @HAL--gb6uf 3 роки тому +1

      @@ListeningIn I always felt that when Kubrick shows landscapes and such, he is suggesting that we ultimately have to go to our origin. In the ending also you could see that the Starchild going back to the earth.

  • @mikebasil4832
    @mikebasil4832 3 роки тому +21

    Ligeti’s use of choirs for the intelligence and power behind the Monolith is timelessly brilliant. Thank you for your very thoughtful depiction of how all the music works so magnificently in 2001: A Space Odyssey. 👏🏻

  • @Rigpasword
    @Rigpasword 11 місяців тому +2

    Fantastic presentation of Ligeti's music in Kubrick's 2001 film... I saw 2001 in the early 70s and many more times since then - it remains in my top five films of all time. I've also come to love the music of Ligeti and have collected almost everything he's written/recorded. Kudos on this outstanding and informative video - expertly designed, edited, and narrated. Can't wait to see more of your channel.

  • @pattyluss
    @pattyluss 5 років тому +30

    Seriously, your editing and contents impeccable! Keep up the great work! Thank you!

    • @ListeningIn
      @ListeningIn  5 років тому +4

      Thank you Patrick! Glad you're enjoying the videos.

  • @LePaulLalonde
    @LePaulLalonde Рік тому +2

    The superposition of music score over film footage is brilliant

    • @Rigpasword
      @Rigpasword 11 місяців тому +1

      Yes, a huge addition to the narrative in my view as well.

  • @michaelhall2709
    @michaelhall2709 10 місяців тому +1

    I always enjoy videos whose subject is much-beloved films where the author’s musicological knowledge is so much greater than my own. One thing I’ll add to your excellent essay: Ligeti actually successfully sued the production over Kubrick’s intentional distortion of “Adventures” to make the voices sound more “alien.”

  • @neocleouscomposer
    @neocleouscomposer 5 років тому +8

    As a huge Ligeti fan, I absolutely love this video. It's so wonderful to see someone talking about his compositional techniques, unpacking the music and explaining the effect of the choices he made. And the description you gave at the beginning of the overall "feel" of his music - it gave me goosebumps. Succinctly and effectively you put into words the complex emotions Ligeti's sound world creates. This is the first video of yours I've seen but I am already hooked and I really really look forward to seeing your channel grow :)

    • @ListeningIn
      @ListeningIn  5 років тому +3

      Thank you so much Thomas - the reason why I set up this channel is because I've always been a bit disappointed with how people talk about contemporary/new music (it always seems a little dumbed down), so I'm really pleased that you enjoy the detail I go into. I've got loads of videos planned as well and I can't wait to get them out into the world! I am also looking forward to seeing my channel grow (little by little!).

  • @irIangeI
    @irIangeI Рік тому +2

    Thank you for this! Amazing work, i'I've been obsessed with the film and the music for years now. The video is also so beautifully edited.

  • @MarthaMooke
    @MarthaMooke 5 років тому +2

    Terrific resource! Showing this to my Contemporary Music class today as we study Ligeti and textural music. Thank you!

    • @ListeningIn
      @ListeningIn  5 років тому +3

      My pleasure! I'm really pleased it's being used in an educational context. Thank you for watching.

  • @educostanzo
    @educostanzo 3 роки тому +7

    I'm currently binging on Ligeti's music (yeah, I know) and I loved this, amazing breakdown. I think I'll have to watch 2001 AGAIN to focus only on the music.

  • @rollexpv1701
    @rollexpv1701 Рік тому +1

    2001 is a beautiful piece of art. The first time I whatched it I almost fell into the trap of saying it was boring. But I decided to go along with it without skipping. But from the moment of the stargate scene I really got confused and my mind was full of emotion. And as he was in that hotel room it really made me feel alone in this universe, almost feel sadness and unjustice for Dave for some reason.
    I love the art of movie making and story telling and you are helping me descifre that. Thank you for putting your time into this because this was great. You need high sensibility to understand theese kind of things.

  • @alanvd2891
    @alanvd2891 4 роки тому +3

    Beautiful work man, I have been watching your videos lately and I am speechless! Thank you for all the work that you are putting in and for sharing your talent! Please keep this videos coming!

    • @ListeningIn
      @ListeningIn  4 роки тому +2

      Thank you so much Alan! What a lovely comment! I will definitely keep them coming.

  • @callmev3531
    @callmev3531 9 місяців тому +1

    The uncertainty and anxiety evoked by the music and ambiguous plot elements additionally contrast to the majestic “Blue Danube” used to feature the procedural and casual nature of space travel in this futuristic era, the point of the film where characters seem most certain and comfortable. The story’s primary message revolves around advancement in terms of not only technology, but also civilization and biology itself, but also how unpredictable, chaotic and frightening the changes it brings can be.

  • @moraga7370
    @moraga7370 5 років тому +5

    Just stumbled across your channel. Absolutely amazing.

    • @ListeningIn
      @ListeningIn  5 років тому +1

      Thank you! I’m really glad you stumbled across my channel!

  • @josiahrogers1728
    @josiahrogers1728 Рік тому +3

    Watching this movie was not only the first time I got genuinely scared in years, but I have never been scared by sound before, this film is made by music

  • @smeaden8947
    @smeaden8947 4 роки тому +5

    Friend, you are a bloody genius! Superb content!

  • @MrBlastCorp
    @MrBlastCorp 5 років тому +2

    Great content, love your videos!! Can you talk about ligeti's string quartet no 2?

    • @ListeningIn
      @ListeningIn  5 років тому +1

      Thank you! That's a really interesting idea. I've been thinking I'd like to analyse a chamber work, so this might well be the one!

  • @williampatrick2971
    @williampatrick2971 Рік тому

    In the early 2000’s, after I watched every movie in the “Stanley Kubrick Collection” (which was from Lolita to Eyes Wide Shut), a friend of mine in L.A sent me burnt discs of all the soundtracks to those films after I had expressed to him how amazing the music was. The ones that I listened to the most involved Ligeti and Penderecki (2001, The Shining, and Eyes Wide Shut). Also, Wendy Carlos contributed greatly to Clockwork Orange and some to the Shining.

  • @AttilaRieger
    @AttilaRieger 3 роки тому

    This is truly amazing! Thanks for this video! I got here from the hip-hop song Ego from The Tribe Called Quest using the sampling of Ligeti’s music can be heard at Kubrick’s master piece.

  • @rostasi
    @rostasi 3 роки тому

    Thanks for your interest in this and thanks for the Patterson link. Looking forward to checking out that essay. You may want to learn the proper pronunciation of both his forename and surname for the sake of accuracy tho. Very nice graphic work and enjoyable presentation. Thanks again!

  • @Ross2505x
    @Ross2505x 3 роки тому

    Can't believe I've only just found your channel! I'm loving your videos, really insightful stuff :)

  • @danoptic
    @danoptic 4 роки тому +2

    Really insightful, thank you. Also, I had never heard Ligeti's name pronounced before, so I feel educated on that, as when I first heard "Gorecki" pronounced correctly. -- a new subscriber in California.

  • @MartinDee2000
    @MartinDee2000 Рік тому +1

    Off-topic note: "The Monolith seems to be 'Controlling' human evolution."
    I always thought it was merely "Monitoring" human evolution.

  • @silkyu3929
    @silkyu3929 4 роки тому +3

    I recently watched this movie and was enamored by its use of sound but couldn't tell you why until I found this. Same goes for my favorite movie Prisoner of Azkaban. Amazing content man, guess the youtube algorithm worked this time

  • @diegoo.3403
    @diegoo.3403 5 років тому +3

    Very impressive and young channel. Do you do the animations as well? I don’t know about it but looks like a lot of work, I wouldn’t know where to start, I wonder how long would it take to learn. Congratulations

    • @ListeningIn
      @ListeningIn  5 років тому +5

      Thank you Diego! I do all of the animations as well. On Final Cut Pro X. Took me a very long time to work it all out! I'm really glad you are enjoying my videos.

  • @jackaguirre8576
    @jackaguirre8576 2 роки тому

    4:57 I wonder what creates that deep rumbling noise? Was it electronic synth at a really low frequency, or something acoustic?

  • @jeffwatkins352
    @jeffwatkins352 3 роки тому +1

    Your videos are remarkably wonderful, this one included. I don't mean to be a wet blanket, but...okay. 2001 is my favorite film of all time which I first saw within weeks of its initial release and which, at age 69, I've re-watched so many times, I've lost count. Well over 100. This is a point I've argued endlessly with the movie's fans, and I'm definitely in the minority, as your comments confirm. But I maintain the film's unseen aliens DO NOT direct human evolution. They simply observe it. As quantum mechanics teaches, even observing a phenomenon changes it. The best way to learn, however, is to keep that change to a minimum, which is exactly what the film's aliens do.

  • @GRIGA01
    @GRIGA01 3 роки тому +4

    Man this stuff is fantastic, great content. Please do one on the works of James Horner

  • @alejandro52612
    @alejandro52612 5 років тому +4

    Extremely informative. Love it!!!

    • @ListeningIn
      @ListeningIn  5 років тому +1

      Thank you - glad you liked it!

  • @eddievhfan1984
    @eddievhfan1984 3 роки тому

    Nice video! And regarding Aventures, it's worth noting two things as well: It was the only piece Ligeti didn't authorize for use in the film, and (possibly related to the former) Kubrick further increased the abstractness through liberal processing of the piece through an echo chamber.
    Also, when listening through the Stargate sequence, did you notice the whooshing and rumbling sounds underlining Atmosphères?

  • @brucehunter4523
    @brucehunter4523 3 роки тому +2

    The requiem is the most astonishing and beautiful piece I have ever heard.

  • @petexander
    @petexander 5 років тому +1

    So glad I discovered this channel! You deserve a much larger audience. Amazing work 👍

    • @ListeningIn
      @ListeningIn  5 років тому +1

      Thank you so much Peter! I'm very glad you've found me as well!

  • @1LaOriental
    @1LaOriental 3 роки тому +1

    Well done, thank you!

  • @danielshannon8831
    @danielshannon8831 Рік тому

    I love your videos. They're brilliant and I know nothing about music and cant play anything or sing.

  • @hamburgerhelpersalisburyst1507
    @hamburgerhelpersalisburyst1507 3 роки тому

    Fantastic editing!

  • @JeroenBaxexm
    @JeroenBaxexm 3 роки тому

    nice one...you should do Spielbergs 'Close encounters...'

  • @bruns.like.spoons9251
    @bruns.like.spoons9251 3 роки тому

    So, uh, why would anyone downvote this video? It boggles my mind.

  • @JDazell
    @JDazell Рік тому

    Also - on a very simple aspect of it's use, (excluding Strauss) Kubrick was using radical music that was premiered across the past 8 years before the release of the film. So he's using forward thinking contemporary music to score a movie set in the future.

  • @noktambulamx7564
    @noktambulamx7564 4 роки тому +1

    beautiful analysis !!!!

  • @lukeskywalker6809
    @lukeskywalker6809 3 роки тому

    As a Hungarian I’m very grateful for your video.

  • @brendonmurley8276
    @brendonmurley8276 3 роки тому

    Thank you so much for your work - it is magnificent.

  • @freddifish7636
    @freddifish7636 2 роки тому

    Stunning video!

  • @mvjonsson
    @mvjonsson 3 роки тому +2

    Ligeti had to press charges against MGM to get royalty for the use of his music in 2001.

  • @havefunbesafe
    @havefunbesafe Місяць тому

    Ligeti is also in Eyes Wide Shut and Shining.

  • @charliehill8068
    @charliehill8068 5 років тому +8

    WHY HAS THIS GOT SO FEW VIEWS WTF

    • @ListeningIn
      @ListeningIn  5 років тому +4

      Ha.. I DON'T KNOW!! UA-cam algorithm. Glad you enjoyed it!

  • @jeffpicklo525
    @jeffpicklo525 5 років тому +3

    Magnificent

  • @lukebingus9432
    @lukebingus9432 5 років тому +2

    Extremely insightful commentary into what makes Ligeti's music so effective in 2001. The Stargate sequence literally changed my life, it was basically a religious experience. Can't say ive really felt that with another film.

    • @ListeningIn
      @ListeningIn  5 років тому +1

      Thank you so much Luke. I'm really pleased you enjoyed my analysis. The Stargate sequence is astonishing and I'm still enormously effected by it, every time I watch it.

    • @MustafaAli-lb8dq
      @MustafaAli-lb8dq 4 роки тому

      Stargate sequence is like LSD trip with horrific music that represents claustrophobia which was also used in Godzilla.

  • @annak76
    @annak76 4 роки тому +1

    brilliant, thank you!!

  • @nicolaslemaire4859
    @nicolaslemaire4859 2 роки тому

    Beautiful !

  • @ziggy_zagged
    @ziggy_zagged 3 роки тому +3

    Remember, he was a Hungarian genius!

  • @eikochan9862
    @eikochan9862 2 роки тому

    I'm watching this because it's required for a classwork. And now I'm thinking your channel should have been my class instead.

  • @MediaLocaBooking
    @MediaLocaBooking 9 місяців тому

    It is sad to read that Kubrick never asked the composer György Ligeti for permission and did not pay any licenses. Neither for "2001" nor for "The Shining" and also not for "Eyes Wide Shut". His / MGM's message to the famous but hardly financially successful composer was that "he should be happy to have been included".

  • @zoompt-lm5xw
    @zoompt-lm5xw 5 років тому

    Excellent channel. Subscribed!

    • @ListeningIn
      @ListeningIn  5 років тому

      Welcome! I'm very glad you've subscribed!

  • @pashaofstuttgart
    @pashaofstuttgart 3 роки тому

    Very good!

  • @ulfingvar1
    @ulfingvar1 6 місяців тому

    You forgot to mention that Kubrick distorted Avventures, without Ligeti's consent, who sued (successfully, by all accounts, and probably was given a hefty sum) but there didn't seem to be any bad blood, as Ligeti's music was used also in Eyes Wide Shut much later.

  • @rsmania01
    @rsmania01 3 роки тому

    Thank you 💙

  • @haisenburguer_rooney
    @haisenburguer_rooney 3 роки тому

    Gracias ❤💯😢

  • @clive3490
    @clive3490 Рік тому +1

    Liggety?

    • @kiereluurs1243
      @kiereluurs1243 Рік тому

      'Yeah, who cares about pronunciation.'
      If one only knows English.

    • @clive3490
      @clive3490 Рік тому

      @@kiereluurs1243 if you are presenting yourself to the world through the medium of the spoken word, you could at least attempt to pronounce peoples names correctly

  • @alamdaali8776
    @alamdaali8776 5 років тому

    04:28 thank you.

  • @raulpardo4210
    @raulpardo4210 3 роки тому +1

    Just read the book and you'll understand everything.

  • @zurps
    @zurps 2 роки тому +1

    Your visuals are very good and the things you say are super interesting, however I think this video would benefit from many more pauses. The info you give is super rapid fire and if you had more 5-10 second pauses between your sentences with the music playing in the background, it would be a masterpiece of a video.

  • @k.t.5405
    @k.t.5405 3 роки тому +1

    always thought it was Ligeti as in "lee-ghetty", not "lickety" as in "lickety -split"

  • @joe-nf8go
    @joe-nf8go 2 роки тому

    U deserve a million subs

  • @parsa.mostaghim
    @parsa.mostaghim 4 роки тому

    🎺🔥

  • @Autostade67
    @Autostade67 Рік тому

    Forget Kubrick and Ligeti - who were they, anyway? This video is a thing of beauty...technical question: what software was used to create this...of only all presentations had this flair and aplomb.

  • @Herfinnur
    @Herfinnur 5 років тому

    Dog gammit you’re good!

  • @OolTube02
    @OolTube02 3 роки тому +1

    It's pronounce "jurj." "Jurj LEE-getty." Like if "George" and "church" had a child.

  • @aaronbuchta339
    @aaronbuchta339 3 роки тому

    The film was a masterpiece, but Ligeti never gave his permission for the use of his music in the film.

    • @OolTube02
      @OolTube02 3 роки тому

      He didn't? Was his music in the public domain?

    • @segmentsAndCurves
      @segmentsAndCurves 3 роки тому

      More reason to abolish copyright.

  • @fleshanthos
    @fleshanthos 3 роки тому

    The beginning Overture represents deep time, that humans missed. The "Celestials" are the first species to reach trans"human" this Galaxy evolved. They would predate us by billions of years. That is what the music represents; their understanding of reality that we can but dimly perceive, much less grasp. The monolith is a tool; a Von Neuman Machine that encourages other species to become trans human. All the vocalizations at the end are Bowman's comprehension of their minds trying to talk to him. "It gives them a headache just trying to think down to our level".

  • @Seaman1010
    @Seaman1010 3 роки тому

    Fantastic essay! However, you could haven taken about 2 minutes and checked how to pronounce György in Hungarian, because this 0:32 sounds absolutely catastrophic XD

    • @artemlyubchenko3022
      @artemlyubchenko3022 3 роки тому

      It doesn’t have to be pronounced like in Hungarian, most people still pronounce “Bach” with a “k” sound, not like it’s pronounced in German.

  • @kiereluurs1243
    @kiereluurs1243 Рік тому

    Interesting overview and dissection.
    But this actually emphasises that 'Space Odyssey' was too pretentious and way over the heads of the audience.
    And frankly, boring to watch at some of the 'key' scenes.

  • @howardchambers9679
    @howardchambers9679 2 роки тому

    Read. The. Fookin. Book.

  • @foleygee
    @foleygee 3 роки тому

    ligeti was first .. he had know idea of the film ..the director choose ligeti ..so stop your b. s.

  • @mohammadbayazid5064
    @mohammadbayazid5064 3 роки тому

    This movie is just stupid