The bias is not for the ACC SMU should be over Georgia,Ole Miss or Tennessee. They actually a conference leader unlike those teams with multiple losses already.
@@damianpresha9833 No, it's because you make no sense. Your standard for who's good and who isn't has no basis on the teams or quality. You just told everyone that teams are better simply by having less losses, which is obviously wrong and everyone that spends 5 seconds following the sport knows it.
@Axel-fn You realize winning have always mattered until now ? That's like saying last year LSU should have made it over Alabama and Georgia even though they had 3 losses. See y'all SEC fanboys delusional it's all about odds even if the results don't match up.
The SEC should implement their own national championship bracket while everyone else plays for the legitimate one. Then, they can seed 5 loss teams without opposition.
The fact that Georgia has the hardest schedule and the second best strengtth of record means they should be WAAAY higher than No. 10. There's no way that Indiana, Miami, Penn State, and Texas are above Georgia when they've beaten a grand total of nobody. Miami is playing a bunch of cupcakes and lost to one in the form of a 5-4 Georgia Tech, Indiana still hasn't played anybody and is only now going to face their first challenge with Ohio State, Penn State's only challenge was Ohio State and they lost, Texas's only challenge was Georgia and they got decimated.
If strength of record/schedule is not going to be the primary metric used by the committee, and the committee feels the eye test is more important, no one will ever schedule a difficult game again. Just not worth it…. Everyone will try and schedule an Indiana schedule going forward
You can't predict who's gonna be good year to year. Indiana had UCLA, Michigan and Washington on their schedule. That would have been a pretty tough schedule last year. Texas had Oklahoma and Michigan which normally would be two tough games. Penn State had Washington, USC and UCLA. So don't be saying that these teams were trying to avoid hard games.
@@MS-ii1sv right but byu played SMU on the road and beat them. SMU hadn’t lost at home for a couple of years before that game. Both SMU and byu each have one loss and SMU is ranked in front of them. Doesn’t make any sense. I would point to Georgia too. No way they should be ranked this low given just how hard their schedule is
@@mtanner5168 You're right about thr BYU SMU thing. BYU lost to Kansas and Kansas is not as bad a team as their record would suggest. They must just be calling that a bad loss. I'd argue BYU had a harder schedule than SMU this year. When it comes down to it those two teams won't make it in through rankings. They'll need to win their conference. Don't worry about Georgia. They are almost guaranteed to make the playoffs with Marshmallow State this week and Georgia Tech the week after.
The fact they have Warde Manual on the show is shocking. The man was a part of the greatest cheating scandal in college football history and now he is on the CFP committee. He brings no credibility to the show.
If strength of schedule is a factor then the Gamecocks are too low at #18. Their defense is arguably the best in the country. They aren't getting in but they would beat any one of those non SEC teams.
The conference championship part of it is good. It makes for more meaningful games later into the season for more fanbases. I like the idea of there being a sort of back door into the playoffs. You get some teams that are peaking at the right time. It makes it interesting..
Break each power 4 conference in half and create divisions that can be rotated yearly. The big ten has 18 teams so that's two divisions of 9 teams. The teams in the division would play each other once, plus play one team from the other division. That's 9 games. They can still have their tune up games or rivalry games with 3 games remaining available. Get rid of the conference championship games and reward the division winners automatic bids. That's 8 guaranteed spots for the power 4. Expand the playoffs to 24 and play the first 16 the same weekend as conference championships. The group or 5 will have 3 guaranteed spots in the tournament if they finish the season ranked. If they finish ranked inside the top 24 they are almost guaranteed to make the 24 team playoff anyways. If the playoffs were set up like this right now, there would be 4 group of five teams in the playoffs. The college football committee would select who gets a first round bye. First round byes are reserved for division champions. They would also select all the remaining teams to make the field and their matchups. They could do a huge segment on TV just like college basketball. If they eliminated the conference championships and added 24 teams, it would make the season at most 17 games. I see no issue with this considering the NCAA will be paying players starting in 2026. If Boise State ends up going 11-1 they would have technically won their division in the way I have it set up. They could still get a bye in the 24 team playoff. Play the first round in the same stadiums the conference championships would have been held. Reward the bye teams with a home playoff game in the second round. The remaining games would all be natural fields just like the first round. The conferences that receive automatic bids all have what I call final four rights. All of these conferences have made the traditional 4 team playoff. The PAC 12 would still have final four rights once they have at least 8 teams in the conference. They can gain a second automatic bid when they reach 16 teams. This will encourage more expansion and growth throughout the final four rights conferences. I wouldn't have more than 20 per conference. The group of five can earn final four rights if a team from their conference reaches the final four. That will grant the conference a automatic bid or two automatic bids if they have 16 or more teams. That would encourage more teams to transfer to a new conference with final four rights. It would control and help direct realignment
The beauty of subjective criteria as teams can be allowed in, based on ‘feel’. Gotta love College Football. Maybe dump conference championship games as the $, isn’t worth missing the playoff??
I've said it from the outset. The CFP should be nothing but Big Ten and SEC teams + Notre Dame and maybe Boise State if Boise wins out in dominant fashion. Oregon, Ohio State, Texas, Georgia, Notre Dame, Alabama, Penn State, Tennessee, Indiana, Ole Miss, Texas A&M, and Boise State. The Big 12 and ACC are incredibly weak. The only team that MIGHT deserve a bid is Miami, but that defense is awful as is that loss to Georgia Tech. Colorado hasn't beaten a single good team.
Lol at the beginning of this season, we were the bottom of the pack in the big 12 according to experts now the big 12 doesn’t have any competition because Colorado is at the top. Boise State hasn’t played anybody worth talking about. What are you saying you sound dumb?
Lol at the beginning of this season, we were the bottom of the pack in the big 12 according to experts now the big 12 doesn’t have any competition because Colorado is at the top. Boise State hasn’t played anybody worth talking about. What are you saying Are you stupid or are you dumb?
I say the teams ranked 13th -24th who dont make the CFP should go to the college football " N.I.T." Seriously. In future they should do this because the teams that dont make the playoffs are going to have a lot of players sit out the bowls they go to If there is another tournament that means something and has value, teams potentially will have some 🔥 to want to compete hard in it. Especially programs who historically dont get big post season opportunities because theyre in a mid-tier conference or something like this
Notre Dame beat A&M, then played a jv schedule and then lost to N. Illinois and they're #6? If they played UGAs schedule they would have lost at least 5.
To all the dipsticks saying Indiana isn’t real, they are doing what they are asked to do, isn’t that how it’s suppose to be? In not why even have the playoff, go back to ranking.and stop blaring people with what if!,,,,
So now college football is starting to look a lot like boxing….Corrupt!!….Teams getting in that don’t belong but are more popular, and will make the rich people richer! 😂 Didn’t see that coming.!! Alabama must have a majority stake in who makes it into the playoffs. 🤔
So Georgia should put together an SEC schedule where the hardest team we face is Oklahoma.. teams Texas have beat are 10-23 and we'll be #3... Weve played 5 top 25 teams, 3 top 10 teams and we beat Texas AT Texas... Somehow they 3 and were 10? Gotchu
You can do that and then the year you do Oklahoma will be a powerhouse again. Texas scheduled the defending national champ and as it turned out they didn't have a great season. Vanderbilt was supposed to be an easy game for Alabama. That's the way the cookie crumbles sometimes.
@MS-ii1sv You're missing the point, UGA has 3 wins over top 20 teams RIGHT NOW, not what they were supposed to be or who they should be.. Yet were behind 10 teams that don't have that resume. This will lead to scheduling cupcakes, there will always be surprises but a soft schedule is a soft schedule and we shouldn't be rewarding that.. Do you disagree?
@@bigbouncer4196 Georgia is still in the playoffs as are 3 other two loss SEC teams so what more do you want? A two loss Big 12 or ACC team doesn't even get a look and the big 10 might get one such team in the rankings if their name is Oregon or Ohio State. Are you afraid that Georgia can't handle the cold in Pennsylvania, Ohio or Notre Dame?
@@MS-ii1sv why is Texas ranked so much higher than us when we beat them at their house, and they don't have any wins against nor have played a top 10 team, why is Indiana SOS 123rd in the country so high? Why is ND who lost to NORTHERN ILLINOIS.. be consistent
@@bigbouncer4196 It doesn't matter anymore. All the complaining was premature. Georgia just has to win the SEC title and they'll have a first round bye. Beat Georgia Tech and they will likely have a home game even if they lose the SEC title game.
It’s sad seeing the bitterness , hatred, and jealousy written all over Booger’s face. He is so biased , it’s really pathetic, He can’t hide it nor does he have the mentality to make a case for his claims, When Joey G is the voice of reason, you know you are watching someone who should not be on tv! Just saying!
Somebody please explain the sheer stupidity of giving the conference champions an automatic bye and a top seed. Those in charge of college football continue to be complete idiots. No other sport does that.
Y’all have lost any integrity you ever had left. BYU by your own protocol should still at minimum top 10 with a win at undefeated SMU. K state has road wins over your 16th and 20th teams is 7-3 And not ranked just to hurt byus chances. Instead mizzou Illinois and unlv are ranked who beat no one
@@dragonsurge1who are these two teams? They lost to 9-1 byu and 8-2 asu. At Houston in basically a hurricane after being up 19-10 in 4th was their only other loss
@@jonathanwrehe8015 not gonna lie, I thought Kstate lost to Kansas lol so that’s my mistake. I agree now that Kstate should be above Illinois. They said they look at “the stats” and the stats say they Illinois has had an overall greater strength of schedule than Kstate and they’re both 7-3 so they put Illinois ahead. I don’t agree with it since Kstate has ranked wins but that’s how I think they did it.
@ yeah they just do things to help who they want in the playoff what brand or sec team they want to justify it’s insane. Cause k state better wins by far and mostly looked better all year than mizzou Illinois and unlv and why the head to head stops now when they went to Tulane and won 😂😂
Alabama could not win a game and still be in the top 25. Why is that? It’s always that way, my buddies is always betting how high they will put Alabama in the rankings! Be fair! Look at Army they are 19-0 and 24th
Honestly, why would playing "nobodies" even matter? If playing the big teams is all that count, then don't even look at anything else. Beating mediocre teams is useless. The SEC should just eliminate 1/2 of their own conference because beating Vanderbilt doesn't matter, beating LSU doesn't even matter this year. Same goes for every other conference. Only the top 4-5 SEC teams deserve to be in the playoffs. Eliminate everyone else. Are these people insane?
@@leehunchooseason isn’t over yet and B10 and SEC are trying to undermine and devalue other conferences’ title games which guarantees a playoff spot. You dudes are in fact crying.
@@treyerosthe metrics say differently this year. Sec teams losing to Sunbelt and MAC schools really hurt. Especially when the school that loss to Georgia State precedes to win conference games against the top schools. Plus Florida and Auburn can still play the spoiler.
just say we go by the eye test
Dude literally said nothing for 5 mins
1 loss (conference) Miami ranked higher than unbeaten conference SMU??? Nooooo,there's no bias from committee
The bias is not for the ACC SMU should be over Georgia,Ole Miss or Tennessee. They actually a conference leader unlike those teams with multiple losses already.
@@damianpresha9833 I'm glad you're not on the committee if that's your standard
@Axel-fn Of course you don't want me in the committee I got guts everybody else doing what they told like good ole boys.
@@damianpresha9833 No, it's because you make no sense. Your standard for who's good and who isn't has no basis on the teams or quality. You just told everyone that teams are better simply by having less losses, which is obviously wrong and everyone that spends 5 seconds following the sport knows it.
@Axel-fn You realize winning have always mattered until now ? That's like saying last year LSU should have made it over Alabama and Georgia even though they had 3 losses. See y'all SEC fanboys delusional it's all about odds even if the results don't match up.
The SEC should implement their own national championship bracket while everyone else plays for the legitimate one. Then, they can seed 5 loss teams without opposition.
The fact that Georgia has the hardest schedule and the second best strengtth of record means they should be WAAAY higher than No. 10. There's no way that Indiana, Miami, Penn State, and Texas are above Georgia when they've beaten a grand total of nobody. Miami is playing a bunch of cupcakes and lost to one in the form of a 5-4 Georgia Tech, Indiana still hasn't played anybody and is only now going to face their first challenge with Ohio State, Penn State's only challenge was Ohio State and they lost, Texas's only challenge was Georgia and they got decimated.
Exactly
The only ranked/good teams Penn state or Texas has played they’ve lost to
Georgia got blown out by ole miss lost to bama in a thriller that's why Georgia is not higher
@@judehiggins4358 Ole Miss and Bama being higher than Georgia is one thing, but Texas? Penn Stats? Indiana? Miami? Be serious.
@@judehiggins4358Miami lost to Unranked GT, and has NO defense, ND lost to NORTHERN ILLINIOIS MY BOI, they shouldn't be in the top 10
@PatriotMapper your team lost 2 games get over it
If strength of record/schedule is not going to be the primary metric used by the committee, and the committee feels the eye test is more important, no one will ever schedule a difficult game again. Just not worth it…. Everyone will try and schedule an Indiana schedule going forward
You can't predict who's gonna be good year to year. Indiana had UCLA, Michigan and Washington on their schedule. That would have been a pretty tough schedule last year. Texas had Oklahoma and Michigan which normally would be two tough games. Penn State had Washington, USC and UCLA.
So don't be saying that these teams were trying to avoid hard games.
@@MS-ii1sv right but byu played SMU on the road and beat them. SMU hadn’t lost at home for a couple of years before that game. Both SMU and byu each have one loss and SMU is ranked in front of them. Doesn’t make any sense. I would point to Georgia too. No way they should be ranked this low given just how hard their schedule is
@@mtanner5168 You're right about thr BYU SMU thing. BYU lost to Kansas and Kansas is not as bad a team as their record would suggest. They must just be calling that a bad loss. I'd argue BYU had a harder schedule than SMU this year. When it comes down to it those two teams won't make it in through rankings. They'll need to win their conference. Don't worry about Georgia. They are almost guaranteed to make the playoffs with Marshmallow State this week and Georgia Tech the week after.
As a Michigan fan I’d like to donate Warde Manuel full-time to the CFP so we can get a real Athletic Director. You’re welcome.
This guy is garbage. Mizzou is still ranked. Nothing he says confirms the reason they rank teams
The fact they have Warde Manual on the show is shocking. The man was a part of the greatest cheating scandal in college football history and now he is on the CFP committee. He brings no credibility to the show.
Except he leads the CFP which means he is only one of 13 credible
Said the same thing last week. Completely corrupt
Dude looking like Abdullah the butcher😂😂😂😂😂
If strength of schedule is a factor then the Gamecocks are too low at #18. Their defense is arguably the best in the country. They aren't getting in but they would beat any one of those non SEC teams.
Agreed 💯
Lucky for y'all Clemson in two weeks
Didn't they just give up 30 to Mizzou?
They would beat Oregon and Ohio State?
Their defense is "arguably the best in the country"? HAHAHA!
Layed the championship game so much they dropped Georgia 5 spots for losing their conference championship.
With that guy as chair, no wonder it’s a mess. Bet he puts mayo on hot dogs and eats em by the dozen!
I don’t think he does Hellman’s.
That's *DISGUSTING*
"Who they are playing against does matter, BUT" so you're basically saying yall haven't really been watching strength of schedule at all.
they should have a tournament of the bottom 12 winless or 1 or 2 win teams
So they go off feelings not facts.. thats why big ten getting so many in.. 8 of the 13 have big ten ties and none have sec ties
Probably cause those teams winning games. If those conference switched results no SEC fan would be crying.
The bracket shouldn't come out until after the last game. Because it's only making this process confusing at this point.
The playoff committee should admit the strength of the schedule does not matter.
Hopefully they just go by rankings in future rather than automatic bids for conference champions.
Is that regular season champions or conference championship game champion?
The conference championship part of it is good. It makes for more meaningful games later into the season for more fanbases. I like the idea of there being a sort of back door into the playoffs. You get some teams that are peaking at the right time. It makes it interesting..
Break each power 4 conference in half and create divisions that can be rotated yearly. The big ten has 18 teams so that's two divisions of 9 teams. The teams in the division would play each other once, plus play one team from the other division. That's 9 games. They can still have their tune up games or rivalry games with 3 games remaining available. Get rid of the conference championship games and reward the division winners automatic bids. That's 8 guaranteed spots for the power 4. Expand the playoffs to 24 and play the first 16 the same weekend as conference championships. The group or 5 will have 3 guaranteed spots in the tournament if they finish the season ranked. If they finish ranked inside the top 24 they are almost guaranteed to make the 24 team playoff anyways. If the playoffs were set up like this right now, there would be 4 group of five teams in the playoffs. The college football committee would select who gets a first round bye. First round byes are reserved for division champions. They would also select all the remaining teams to make the field and their matchups. They could do a huge segment on TV just like college basketball. If they eliminated the conference championships and added 24 teams, it would make the season at most 17 games. I see no issue with this considering the NCAA will be paying players starting in 2026.
If Boise State ends up going 11-1 they would have technically won their division in the way I have it set up. They could still get a bye in the 24 team playoff. Play the first round in the same stadiums the conference championships would have been held. Reward the bye teams with a home playoff game in the second round. The remaining games would all be natural fields just like the first round.
The conferences that receive automatic bids all have what I call final four rights. All of these conferences have made the traditional 4 team playoff. The PAC 12 would still have final four rights once they have at least 8 teams in the conference. They can gain a second automatic bid when they reach 16 teams. This will encourage more expansion and growth throughout the final four rights conferences. I wouldn't have more than 20 per conference. The group of five can earn final four rights if a team from their conference reaches the final four. That will grant the conference a automatic bid or two automatic bids if they have 16 or more teams. That would encourage more teams to transfer to a new conference with final four rights. It would control and help direct realignment
The beauty of subjective criteria as teams can be allowed in, based on ‘feel’. Gotta love College Football. Maybe dump conference championship games as the $, isn’t worth missing the playoff??
I've said it from the outset. The CFP should be nothing but Big Ten and SEC teams + Notre Dame and maybe Boise State if Boise wins out in dominant fashion.
Oregon, Ohio State, Texas, Georgia, Notre Dame, Alabama, Penn State, Tennessee, Indiana, Ole Miss, Texas A&M, and Boise State.
The Big 12 and ACC are incredibly weak. The only team that MIGHT deserve a bid is Miami, but that defense is awful as is that loss to Georgia Tech. Colorado hasn't beaten a single good team.
@@RobbieStacks90 stopped reading @ Boise state. Go get serious about life.
Lol at the beginning of this season, we were the bottom of the pack in the big 12 according to experts now the big 12 doesn’t have any competition because Colorado is at the top. Boise State hasn’t played anybody worth talking about. What are you saying you sound dumb?
Lol at the beginning of this season, we were the bottom of the pack in the big 12 according to experts now the big 12 doesn’t have any competition because Colorado is at the top. Boise State hasn’t played anybody worth talking about. What are you saying Are you stupid or are you dumb?
You think Miami would beat Clemson or SMU with that defense? Heck no. Id take Clemson over both just because they always have elite defenses.
@@dshotta5280Boise State lost a close one to Oregon and beat UNLV.
I say the teams ranked 13th -24th who dont make the CFP should go to the college football " N.I.T."
Seriously. In future they should do this because the teams that dont make the playoffs are going to have a lot of players sit out the bowls they go to
If there is another tournament that means something and has value, teams potentially will have some 🔥 to want to compete hard in it.
Especially programs who historically dont get big post season opportunities because theyre in a mid-tier conference or something like this
did it to Georgia last year one lost team out of the play offs
You know they don't watch games they just go by wins and loses
Someone tell Daredevil to come get this dude!
They look at wins and losses.
Roll Tide! 🐘
Notre Dame beat A&M, then played a jv schedule and then lost to N. Illinois and they're #6? If they played UGAs schedule they would have lost at least 5.
JV schedule? You realize Georgia lost to Ole Miss by 18, who lost to 6 loss Kentucky?
@damianpresha9833 all 3 would beat ND
@@happilyretiredmark2964 😂😂😂
@@damianpresha9833 UGA has played 3 of these top 12 teams. How many has ND played? Also all 3 of those on the road
@kevinnorth7265 Do your own homework on ND.
To all the dipsticks saying Indiana isn’t real, they are doing what they are asked to do, isn’t that how it’s suppose to be? In not why even have the playoff, go back to ranking.and stop blaring people with what if!,,,,
So now college football is starting to look a lot like boxing….Corrupt!!….Teams getting in that don’t belong but are more popular, and will make the rich people richer! 😂 Didn’t see that coming.!! Alabama must have a majority stake in who makes it into the playoffs. 🤔
So Georgia should put together an SEC schedule where the hardest team we face is Oklahoma.. teams Texas have beat are 10-23 and we'll be #3... Weve played 5 top 25 teams, 3 top 10 teams and we beat Texas AT Texas... Somehow they 3 and were 10? Gotchu
You can do that and then the year you do Oklahoma will be a powerhouse again. Texas scheduled the defending national champ and as it turned out they didn't have a great season. Vanderbilt was supposed to be an easy game for Alabama. That's the way the cookie crumbles sometimes.
@MS-ii1sv You're missing the point, UGA has 3 wins over top 20 teams RIGHT NOW, not what they were supposed to be or who they should be.. Yet were behind 10 teams that don't have that resume. This will lead to scheduling cupcakes, there will always be surprises but a soft schedule is a soft schedule and we shouldn't be rewarding that.. Do you disagree?
@@bigbouncer4196 Georgia is still in the playoffs as are 3 other two loss SEC teams so what more do you want? A two loss Big 12 or ACC team doesn't even get a look and the big 10 might get one such team in the rankings if their name is Oregon or Ohio State. Are you afraid that Georgia can't handle the cold in Pennsylvania, Ohio or Notre Dame?
@@MS-ii1sv why is Texas ranked so much higher than us when we beat them at their house, and they don't have any wins against nor have played a top 10 team, why is Indiana SOS 123rd in the country so high? Why is ND who lost to NORTHERN ILLINOIS.. be consistent
@@bigbouncer4196 It doesn't matter anymore. All the complaining was premature. Georgia just has to win the SEC title and they'll have a first round bye. Beat Georgia Tech and they will likely have a home game even if they lose the SEC title game.
Byu loose and drop a bunch ... Miami loose and cfp committee didnt even blink lol and they not even leading the ACC at the moment ...MIAMI TOO HIGH
Bro, as a miami fan I AGREE WITH YOU BRO. We are not even making acc championship
These people are a joke.
It’s sad seeing the bitterness , hatred, and jealousy written all over Booger’s face. He is so biased , it’s really pathetic, He can’t hide it nor does he have the mentality to make a case for his claims, When Joey G is the voice of reason, you know you are watching someone who should not be on tv! Just saying!
Somebody please explain the sheer stupidity of giving the conference champions an automatic bye and a top seed. Those in charge of college football continue to be complete idiots. No other sport does that.
The NFl's division winners would like a word with you
Byu over Colorado is a joke lol
Everyone like my comment so I can get a bunch of notifications currently at 35k
Y’all have lost any integrity you ever had left. BYU by your own protocol should still at minimum top 10 with a win at undefeated SMU. K state has road wins over your 16th and 20th teams is 7-3
And not ranked just to hurt byus chances. Instead mizzou Illinois and unlv are ranked who beat no one
Kstate has lost against 2 teams that won’t even be bowl eligible…. That cancels out their wins vs Colorado and Tulane.
BYU was never top 10 and would lose by 3 tds to a real team
@@dragonsurge1who are these two teams? They lost to 9-1 byu and 8-2 asu. At Houston in basically a hurricane after being up 19-10 in 4th was their only other loss
@@jonathanwrehe8015 not gonna lie, I thought Kstate lost to Kansas lol so that’s my mistake. I agree now that Kstate should be above Illinois.
They said they look at “the stats” and the stats say they Illinois has had an overall greater strength of schedule than Kstate and they’re both 7-3 so they put Illinois ahead. I don’t agree with it since Kstate has ranked wins but that’s how I think they did it.
@ yeah they just do things to help who they want in the playoff what brand or sec team they want to justify it’s insane. Cause k state better wins by far and mostly looked better all year than mizzou Illinois and unlv and why the head to head stops now when they went to Tulane and won 😂😂
Alabama could not win a game and still be in the top 25. Why is that? It’s always that way, my buddies is always betting how high they will put Alabama in the rankings!
Be fair! Look at Army they are 19-0 and 24th
Honestly, why would playing "nobodies" even matter? If playing the big teams is all that count, then don't even look at anything else. Beating mediocre teams is useless. The SEC should just eliminate 1/2 of their own conference because beating Vanderbilt doesn't matter, beating LSU doesn't even matter this year. Same goes for every other conference. Only the top 4-5 SEC teams deserve to be in the playoffs. Eliminate everyone else. Are these people insane?
Just make sure the top teams don’t play eachother and schedule FCS out of conference
B10 and SEC crying because they’re gonna be left out of the playoffs is hilarious to me. Cry me a river.
.
Who crying Bama getting in 😂
@@leehunchooseason isn’t over yet and B10 and SEC are trying to undermine and devalue other conferences’ title games which guarantees a playoff spot. You dudes are in fact crying.
@@newwbein not relaxed my guy yall the ones fighting to prove yall worth not the sec 🤣
@@leehunchoo the same SEC that’s suffered multiple losses to not only out of conference teams but FCS teams? Okay! lol
ESPN can’t even hide their SEC bias. It is painful to watch.
Sec is better it ain’t no bias into it
@@treyerosthe metrics say differently this year. Sec teams losing to Sunbelt and MAC schools really hurt. Especially when the school that loss to Georgia State precedes to win conference games against the top schools. Plus Florida and Auburn can still play the spoiler.
College football is a disaster... I'm done!