That’s pretty interesting, especially developing a way to check for lateral wear . That is something of a concern, especially with a 1 x group set. Thank You for sharing 😊
I would go out on a limb and say that lateral flexibility is what you want especially on a 1-by drivetrain. Unless it affects longitudinal extension, which youz would be able to detect using a classic chain wear tool. There is no point in the tool presented here 😊
That’s pretty interesting, especially developing a way to check for lateral wear . That is something of a concern, especially with a 1 x group set. Thank You for sharing 😊
so what standard was used to make the chain wear tool? I mean you could just copy the park tools wear standard, but is it more than that with yours?
Perhaps ask Abbey Tools this question?
Brilliant idea, but not as convenient as the widely accepted chain wear tool.
I would go out on a limb and say that lateral flexibility is what you want especially on a 1-by drivetrain. Unless it affects longitudinal extension, which youz would be able to detect using a classic chain wear tool. There is no point in the tool presented here 😊
I disagree, I like this tool as it negates the need for a separate tool to measure SRAM chains.
How was I first??
Omg i am secondedededddd
3rd!🎉
You all receive the mega participation award.
Fixing a problem that does not exist. Probably with considerable expense too.
Chain wear doesn't exist?
@@GravelCyclistit does, but lateral flex in a chain is not a relevant problem 😊
@@timoe2469 I mostly liked the one tool to measure all chains, vs a separate tool for SRAM chains.
@@GravelCyclist I was not aware of the need for a dedicated sram chain tool! (What is different with these?)
SRAM 12-speed flat-top chains for road / gravel, etc, use larger diameter rollers, which throws off the measurement with a traditional chain tool.
Why is everything with these tools called a "guy"?
Quick off the cuff video, perhaps cut Jason some slack?