Animals Cannot Be Blue | Explorer

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 вер 2024
  • Sometimes nature plays tricks on us. Animals use color in remarkable ways to attract mates or disguise themselves.
    ➡ Subscribe: bit.ly/NatGeoSu...
    ➡ Watch all clips of Explorer here: bit.ly/WatchExp...
    ➡ Get More Explorer: on.natgeo.com/....
    #NationalGeographic #Illusions #Explorer
    About Explorer:
    Explorer, the longest-running documentary series in cable television history, honored with nearly 60 Emmys and hundreds of other awards, continues as a series of major specials on the National Geographic Channel. In the course of more than two thousand films, Explorer has taken viewers to more than 120 countries, opening a window on hidden parts of the world, unlocking mysteries both ancient and modern, and investigating stories of science, nature, and culture.
    Get More National Geographic:
    Official Site: bit.ly/NatGeoOf...
    Facebook: bit.ly/FBNatGeo
    Twitter: bit.ly/NatGeoTw...
    Instagram: bit.ly/NatGeoInsta
    About National Geographic
    National Geographic is the world's premium destination for science, exploration, and adventure. Through their world-class scientists, photographers, journalists, and filmmakers, Nat Geo gets you closer to the stories that matter and past the edge of what's possible.
    Animals Cannot Be Blue | Explorer
    • Animals Cannot Be Blue...
    National Geographic
    / natgeo

КОМЕНТАРІ • 3,4 тис.

  • @NatGeo
    @NatGeo  5 років тому +1385

    Some animals might appear blue, but they are deceiving you. What are your thoughts on this trick of the eye?

    • @juanrodrigez7460
      @juanrodrigez7460 5 років тому +32

      Should we trust blue blood animals??

    • @nicksullivan4203
      @nicksullivan4203 5 років тому +61

      What about blue eyes

    • @quantumcity6679
      @quantumcity6679 5 років тому +8

      We can't say anything... But we can imagine.... I 🤔 that one of the species of animals on 🌍 definitely have UV 👀 ....I'm 🤔 about there Retina Display.... 🙄

    • @cheffythomas8520
      @cheffythomas8520 5 років тому +16

      This is why I love photography/film making and nature. I really love lighting and the science of light. Thank you for sharing this.

    • @bishwajitpothal4592
      @bishwajitpothal4592 5 років тому +2

      Eyes hypnotized us .. 😵😵

  • @canyounot810
    @canyounot810 5 років тому +1889

    People:
    People: I saw a blue butterfl-
    NatGEO: well yes but actually no

    • @Lyre206
      @Lyre206 5 років тому +6

      can you not 😂

    • @aelivi
      @aelivi 5 років тому +3

      can you not 😂😂😂

    • @p1ss.official
      @p1ss.official 4 роки тому +3

      can you not 😂😂😂😂😂😂

    • @acid133
      @acid133 4 роки тому +2

      can you not 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

    • @lachupacabra3692
      @lachupacabra3692 4 роки тому +6

      Not you can 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

  • @daanm3869
    @daanm3869 5 років тому +3903

    'they appear blue'
    yeah when something appears to be blue, we call that: 'blue'

    • @omegaman5663
      @omegaman5663 5 років тому +60

      lmao

    • @minimons684
      @minimons684 5 років тому +11

      Lol

    • @MrAndido
      @MrAndido 5 років тому +44

      Was looking for this

    • @fluxpistol3608
      @fluxpistol3608 5 років тому +217

      The sun appears to rise & fall but in fact we circle around it. There’s a big difference between what truely is & what appears to be the case. If you can see the value in knowledge. Leave it to those whom do.

    • @MrAndido
      @MrAndido 5 років тому +78

      Pretty. However, they used a logical fallacy. It is not the the animal that is blue, it is the light. The only reason the “true blues” can’t change collor is because the pigment is contained within the cells, thus we are unable to dilute or do anything to change it. Still, the pigment reflects blue, like, well, anything that we see as blue. Not the thing, just the light.

  • @thetravelingdoc8200
    @thetravelingdoc8200 4 роки тому +652

    The video ends with "If you can't trust your own eyes,what can you trust"
    Inner me: Definitely not your channel.

    • @JosephM
      @JosephM 4 роки тому +9

      OOOOOOHH

    • @retardman5193
      @retardman5193 4 роки тому +13

      Not even funny

    • @PrettybuoyJones1992
      @PrettybuoyJones1992 4 роки тому +3

      Lol

    • @sumthintuf3648
      @sumthintuf3648 4 роки тому +5

      How? Do you not wanna believe the facts they just gave or something or am I missing something here lmao

    • @xavierjones6048
      @xavierjones6048 4 роки тому +17

      No they are facts but also color is subjective for people so it's hard to decipher what is reality and your mind. I mean what you see is the truth. It is your truth. But reality is different. You could make the argument that when you see blue that thing is blue. You can also make the argument that blue is just reflected back into your eyes. See why its confusing to some people?

  • @pman2434
    @pman2434 5 років тому +2325

    Should've been titled: "Why Blue is Such An Interesting Color in The Animal Kingdom" not "Animals Cannot Be Blue" because they can and you even said so in the video

    • @CarthagoMike
      @CarthagoMike 5 років тому +61

      yeh, sadly a clickbait title, which is truely ashame since it is a very interesting topic on its own. It doesn't need a clickbait title.

    • @Madeeha_shinkoko
      @Madeeha_shinkoko 5 років тому +9

      It's called clickbait, my son. Welcome to the internet.

    • @LosloTypical
      @LosloTypical 5 років тому +22

      Doesn't really matter. It was an interesting video nonetheless with some pretty neat shots.

    • @Msnaida123
      @Msnaida123 5 років тому +1

      In nature* ;)

    • @lordhuebi
      @lordhuebi 5 років тому +11

      @@Madeeha_shinkoko Just because it's a common thing, doesn't mean we have to accept it and be fine with it. Welcome to not being a sheep.

  • @fellowbiodegradablehomosap2871
    @fellowbiodegradablehomosap2871 5 років тому +690

    TITLE: *ANIMALS CANNOT BE BLUE*
    03:02 *_proceeds to show animals being blue_*
    When National Geographic starts using clickbait, that’s how you know we’ve reached the peak

    • @JMRabil675
      @JMRabil675 5 років тому +8

      Exactly what I thought... They have to use clickbait because in the big 6 English speaking countries, there is a distrust in new content, so content creators have to 'trick' people (morons I like to call them) into clicking on the video and falling for the bait. I just came here to whine about it lol

    • @killerpussy84
      @killerpussy84 5 років тому

      Hopefully the peak, 'cause it means it will get better soon ....

    • @inno6788
      @inno6788 5 років тому +1

      @@killerpussy84 if its the peak then it would go downhill from here

    • @12DAMDO
      @12DAMDO 5 років тому

      when i saw the title i thought Vsauce was back

    • @12DAMDO
      @12DAMDO 5 років тому

      killerkitten the peak is not rockbottom

  • @shakhri9077
    @shakhri9077 4 роки тому +1683

    “No blue foods”
    I guess blueberrys are orange then

    • @owbahraniya500
      @owbahraniya500 4 роки тому +88

      When you cut them, they’re not blue inside... only outside

    • @derp33squid
      @derp33squid 4 роки тому +71

      I think of blueberries as more of an indigo

    • @g0ldamps391
      @g0ldamps391 4 роки тому +34

      they're blue cuz they are called blue berry. dats the logic of my stupid brain.

    • @erniellerena
      @erniellerena 4 роки тому +33

      Blueberry pie and muffins tend to be purple not blue.

    • @passionweasel3181
      @passionweasel3181 4 роки тому +10

      Who knows maybe it’s just a very rich purple that looks blue well there’s probably a reasoning

  • @InvestorAcademyPodca
    @InvestorAcademyPodca 5 років тому +6156

    So, animals cannot be blue except for the ones that are blue.

    • @OfficiallyKelvin
      @OfficiallyKelvin 5 років тому +174

      pretty much

    • @mangledfoxy2052
      @mangledfoxy2052 5 років тому +262

      I’ve seen many stupid and/or confusing things, but this among the top ones

    • @666qwertz
      @666qwertz 5 років тому +206

      No, it is not blue. The butterflys wing appears blue because it filters out all the other colours from ambient light. The wing itself has no blue colour (in the sense that "normal" blue color stems from another physical principle). The video made a poor job explaining the fundamental different physical phenomena though...

    • @chandlerblachut3878
      @chandlerblachut3878 5 років тому +120

      666qwertz then right after that it shows a different butterfly that actually has blue pigment. And also the blue dart frog. So it kind of contradicts itself

    • @Icewind007
      @Icewind007 5 років тому +17

      That logic only works if you agree that if I tape a blue filter to your face, everything is blue. Most of us would disagree.

  • @balys2168
    @balys2168 5 років тому +1470

    *Parrot*
    **laughs in blue**

  • @thetwelfth9987
    @thetwelfth9987 4 роки тому +454

    So in short: the Smurfs have been tricking us since 1958.

    • @theautistic.teacher
      @theautistic.teacher 4 роки тому +13

      They were originally green, but it would be harder to distinguish them because of the grass, so the creator changed their color to blue.

    • @jorbennoten9536
      @jorbennoten9536 4 роки тому +3

      Wait smurfs aren't real

    • @thetwelfth9987
      @thetwelfth9987 4 роки тому +5

      @@jorbennoten9536 after watching the cgi movies I’m glad they don’t

    • @madil2259
      @madil2259 4 роки тому

      @@thetwelfth9987 yeah me too.

    • @ME_Toons
      @ME_Toons 3 роки тому

      ;(

  • @arjunraj823
    @arjunraj823 5 років тому +500

    Me:Our planet is called 'the blue planet
    Alien: So you have alot of blue.
    Me:It's rare in our planet.😊

    • @corynorell3686
      @corynorell3686 5 років тому +5

      It's called that because of the water you ninny

    • @novidsnosubs9758
      @novidsnosubs9758 5 років тому +29

      Cory Norell yes but they are saying how confused the alien would be😂

    • @arjunraj823
      @arjunraj823 5 років тому

      @@pheenixgryphon7857 😉😉

    • @alexia3993
      @alexia3993 5 років тому

      lol

  • @akashkunte7444
    @akashkunte7444 5 років тому +3485

    Will Smith is Blue.

    • @NikkiCurve
      @NikkiCurve 5 років тому +50

      Lmfaooooo

    • @aozorafreak
      @aozorafreak 5 років тому +187

      In Aladdin ?
      He's black
      Your eyes are deceiving you
      Lol

    • @beta700a
      @beta700a 5 років тому +99

      No, he only appears to be blue!

    • @shanhussain6114
      @shanhussain6114 5 років тому +40

      CGI is "essentially" playing with the physics of light... electromagnetism. So, no he isn't a true blue.

    • @rogerr.2507
      @rogerr.2507 5 років тому +19

      This comment is heavily underrated!
      Great one buddy haha

  • @frann8552
    @frann8552 5 років тому +338

    National Geographic:
    Animals cannot be blue
    Poison Dart frog:
    Am I a joke to you

    • @retardman5193
      @retardman5193 4 роки тому +8

      They're an exception.

    • @hairyputter5363
      @hairyputter5363 4 роки тому +2

      @Erikas Sadauskas anything that can kill you easily isn't a joke

    • @janmanuel4273
      @janmanuel4273 2 роки тому +1

      Fighter fish: hold my bite

  • @finchbird2419
    @finchbird2419 5 років тому +1229

    Video: uses the light spectrum to explain why things look blue
    Me: that's literally how every color works wtf

    • @lubv3965
      @lubv3965 4 роки тому +63

      thats what im thinking atm

    • @retardman5193
      @retardman5193 4 роки тому +8

      But blue is way rare.

    • @namelastname9580
      @namelastname9580 4 роки тому +13

      just going to like because you spelled literally correctly

    • @LouisLixes
      @LouisLixes 4 роки тому +88

      The difference is when not under the exposure of light these "skins" will maintain their color while the fake ones won't.

    • @eertikrux666
      @eertikrux666 4 роки тому +1

      Same

  • @jayroumimper
    @jayroumimper 5 років тому +1434

    Nobody:
    National Geographic
    : Animals cannot be blue

    • @autisticbot6904
      @autisticbot6904 5 років тому +17

      *The More You Know*

    • @leosurname6993
      @leosurname6993 5 років тому +40

      Me: Can animals be blue?
      Natgeo: No but actually yes.

    • @ryancoates665
      @ryancoates665 5 років тому

      Autistic Bot the less you don’t

    • @sluggish._
      @sluggish._ 5 років тому

      And? It’s a literal known fact.

  • @ZOMGILOST
    @ZOMGILOST 5 років тому +218

    Blue light is produced when blue wavelength of light is reflected, right? Regardless if there is blue pigment or not, as long as something reflects blue light, then it is blue.

    • @nothankyoutube
      @nothankyoutube 4 роки тому +6

      The light you're receiving is blue yes, but one reflects blue but the rest filter.

    • @Termerpores
      @Termerpores 4 роки тому +8

      An example would be a glass prism. A glass prism refracts light and causes a rainbow spectrum to be reflected as a result. In our eyes, the glass prism appears rainbow in colour, but in reality, the glass prism itself has no colour and is clear. So the same applies. Yes, blue is reflected off the butterfly's wings into the eyes so we precieved it as blue, but the wings itself is may not be blue in colour . Hence "fake blue"

    • @paradise4213
      @paradise4213 4 роки тому +8

      @@Termerpores But couldn't the same apply to Red or Green? Some jackets are made the same way, they just reflect light to show red or green, but we don't call those "fake" red or green.

    • @oscard.lisboa6105
      @oscard.lisboa6105 4 роки тому +1

      @@Termerpores u cant use glass and compare it to animals bro

    • @Termerpores
      @Termerpores 4 роки тому +7

      @@oscard.lisboa6105 that is why it is called an "example". It does not have to be glass to produce this effect you potato. The prism example is to make it easier to understand the concept of diffraction, not to say the wings are made of glass

  • @shadowshinobin8641
    @shadowshinobin8641 5 років тому +1119

    Scientist : animal's can't be blue.
    Nature : *Hold my beer*

  • @NeilLopes
    @NeilLopes 5 років тому +488

    The rarity of blue is what makes it exotic and beautiful.

    • @abhaysharma9317
      @abhaysharma9317 5 років тому +10

      Neel is blue in Hindi.

    • @andromeda3780
      @andromeda3780 5 років тому

      @@abhaysharma9317 interesting how it sounds like Nile (the river) when it pronounced in Arabic. The word itself comes from dyes and more particularly a bule ones 💙

    • @hotpockets2224
      @hotpockets2224 5 років тому +1

      u should search what royal purple is haha now that is a rare color for sure

    • @Worldofourown2024
      @Worldofourown2024 5 років тому +1

      Blue is my favorite. Blue is beautiful, peaceful, and honest. Purple is royal and red is provocative and even hostile. Yellow stands out for all to see.

    • @RosinGoblin
      @RosinGoblin 5 років тому

      Now listen up here's a story

  • @jerry1309able
    @jerry1309able 4 роки тому +138

    Shows a bird that's faking a blue color
    Peacocks: Hold my beer

    • @maqsoodchoudhary2413
      @maqsoodchoudhary2413 4 роки тому +6

      JerryJoseph its purple not blue

    • @chickentunna
      @chickentunna 4 роки тому +1

      JerryJoseph lmaooo 😂

    • @bronzee548
      @bronzee548 4 роки тому +3

      @@maqsoodchoudhary2413 It is blue

    • @pramanaart6062
      @pramanaart6062 3 роки тому +3

      @@bronzee548 it is bird :/

    • @suicidal.session
      @suicidal.session 3 роки тому +2

      wait is this meant to say that peacocks are actually blue because don't peacocks also use the same technique as the blue morpho to appear blue? the feathers refract the light in a way that makes it look blue to our eyes but it's not actually blue?

  • @bentleyboy72
    @bentleyboy72 5 років тому +390

    Pigment or not, if it looks blue, its blue. If blue light is reflected from an object, that object is blue. That's quite literally the definition of color.

    • @devangel990
      @devangel990 5 років тому +28

      Obviously they're talking about blue pigment. Yeah, it's blue in APPEARANCE, but it IS not blue.

    • @bentleyboy72
      @bentleyboy72 5 років тому +67

      @@devangel990 Nothing IS blue. Nothing IS any color. Color is determined 100% by the wavelengths an object reflects. BUT...since that's the case for everything in existence, we just simplify things and say that if something looks a color, then it IS that color.

    • @jayce7646
      @jayce7646 5 років тому +10

      FishAntsPlantsAndDave These fartknockers just needed an excuse to talk about science.
      They could have made a quality video about the electromagnetic spectrum and how light interacts with the eye.
      Instead they decided fabricate a conspiracy and challenge your ability to use common sense. Classic Click-bait BS

    • @devangel990
      @devangel990 5 років тому +5

      Fine, my term and usage of IS was wrong, but the video is still obviously talking about pigment, and this is a pointless argument.

    • @jim123bcbhd9
      @jim123bcbhd9 5 років тому

      @@jayce7646 true

  • @matthewstephens6502
    @matthewstephens6502 5 років тому +369

    No blue pigment, but they're still blue. Semantics.

  • @karenmwehp1206
    @karenmwehp1206 4 роки тому +652

    No one:
    Not even a braincell of albert einstein
    Blue whale: am i a joke to you
    🐳
    Edit: omg tysm for the likes💙
    Merry Christmas everyone 💙

    • @PremKumar-pr5iw
      @PremKumar-pr5iw 4 роки тому +3

      😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🙏🙏😂🤣🤣🤣awsm

    • @AminGuides
      @AminGuides 4 роки тому +3

      Well yes

    • @emmaqiu
      @emmaqiu 4 роки тому +38

      lmao they're grey

    • @bhbg0309
      @bhbg0309 4 роки тому +13

      emma yah they are grey. They appear turquoise bluish when they are right below the water’s surface. Hence the name given to them by scientists.

    • @anotadonneb3108
      @anotadonneb3108 4 роки тому +1

      Had the same idea as you lmao

  • @The33scap
    @The33scap 5 років тому +293

    Is Will Smith blue or has he just evolved a way to trick your eyes?

    • @eidrag
      @eidrag 5 років тому +17

      He's ascended to higher plane, rendering light reflected to be perceived as blue

    • @maalikisadikin4388
      @maalikisadikin4388 5 років тому +4

      Lol 😂

    • @CrazyAsianDude
      @CrazyAsianDude 5 років тому +5

      Yup.....CGI?

    • @indym8523
      @indym8523 5 років тому

      My first wish would be to rewind UA-cam Rewind

    • @jaypalmer2463
      @jaypalmer2463 5 років тому +2

      Under rated comment

  • @mateogonzalez5678
    @mateogonzalez5678 5 років тому +318

    This feels the same as saying, "people don't actually think for themselves because your brain runs on auto pilot for 80% of the time." The only way we can see blue IS because of the light reflecting off of whatever, so then it IS blue regardless of the process of making it blue. So that statement about the sea and the sky seem redundant. Creatures like that butterfly are very interesting in the way they create it, but the result still stays the same, blue butterfly. I'm sorry the title just bothers me because they even mentioned two animals that are naturally pigmented blue, no tricks.

    • @Timbit
      @Timbit 5 років тому +16

      You're right

    • @SolvayConference
      @SolvayConference 5 років тому +1

      Which two animals have naturally pigmented blue?

    • @DVN11227
      @DVN11227 5 років тому +20

      Sure. The correct angle would be describing the blue surface in contact with the air/ water vs. the surface of the pigment particles slightly below the surface of the body, also appearing blue - and the physics of the light scattering and reflection producing the same image in our brain regardless of the two types of sources. Nothing about the light reflection off the pigment is mentioned, let along the mechanism how the brain distinguishes the wavelengths. "Deception" is not an appropriate word, just different mechanisms are at play.

    • @mateogonzalez5678
      @mateogonzalez5678 5 років тому +7

      @@SolvayConference The Olive Wing butterfly and the Blue Poison Dart Frog

    • @ho2cultcha
      @ho2cultcha 5 років тому +7

      every pigment color has it's own 'tricks' of perception.

  • @parmaxolotl
    @parmaxolotl 4 роки тому +64

    What the video should actually be titled: "Most animals don't actually have blue pigment, so they have to find other ways to reflect blue light"

    • @josh-bs1vq
      @josh-bs1vq Рік тому

      ain't nobody got time for that

  • @John-wd9mx
    @John-wd9mx 5 років тому +383

    Blueberry: am I a joke to you?

    • @PantsB4Squares
      @PantsB4Squares 5 років тому +35

      "No foods are blue" i immediately thought of the blued berries.

    • @peacewillow
      @peacewillow 5 років тому +32

      blueberries are actually purple, which would imply some blue pigment mixed with some red pigment.....

    • @bashundersmarck3990
      @bashundersmarck3990 5 років тому +6

      @@peacewillow blue pigment...

    • @arifsugianto5245
      @arifsugianto5245 5 років тому +2

      All animals stare at you... WTF -_-

    • @orangeboy97
      @orangeboy97 5 років тому +1

      @@peacewillow bLuE pIGmEnT??

  • @BobMcCoy
    @BobMcCoy 5 років тому +764

    *_Avatar has left the chat_*

    • @MidnightBloomDev
      @MidnightBloomDev 5 років тому +9

      *originality has left the chat*

    • @sophonax661
      @sophonax661 5 років тому +4

      162 people gave a shiny blue thumb up, I think Avatar can come back and enjoy the virtual, true blue of YT :)

    • @bmona7550
      @bmona7550 5 років тому

      *Will Smith entered the chat*

  • @anavideos2445
    @anavideos2445 4 роки тому +33

    "Animals cannot be blue."
    Blue Macaw: *Am I a joke to you?*

  • @JustScrapHD
    @JustScrapHD 5 років тому +370

    There is no such thing as "true blue" Everything that appears blue, actualy is blue. Nature just found different ways of archieving blue.
    The only question is, why blue pegments are so rare compared to the others

    • @jayce7646
      @jayce7646 5 років тому +46

      DEUCE Your opinion is Valid. The argument is moot. This entire video is a series of long-winded arbitrary semantics.
      Using NatGeo logic, Ice isn’t cold, you are just warm.

    • @snapple1877
      @snapple1877 5 років тому +3

      @@jayce7646 lol, they have fallen to fallacious reasoning and pseudoscience.

    • @jayce7646
      @jayce7646 5 років тому +6

      snapple187, They have fallen into the trap of greed and desperation.
      They’ve forgotten their reputation as a trustworthy and educational media outlet.
      It won’t be too long before they begin advertising snake oil and voodoo beads that hail from ancient alien civilizations.

    • @snapple1877
      @snapple1877 5 років тому

      Jayce Segler lol

    • @bonelessbagel2624
      @bonelessbagel2624 5 років тому +3

      You guys obviously havent listened to the video

  • @sophonax661
    @sophonax661 5 років тому +87

    But using pigments also changes the way light waves are reflected or absorbed. I get why it's amazing that blue pigments are rare, but in the end of the day, every perceived color is a "trick" of the physical properties of light. Not just blue.
    As far as I know plants are only green because green wave lengths are _not_ absorbed by chlorophyll, but almost all other wave lengths. So plants do quite the same as these butterflies by reflecting only the specific color that we can see. They only use a pigment so the effect is steady and doesnt depend on angles.

    • @Qui-9
      @Qui-9 5 років тому

      Understanding the explanation is key. Basically holographic blue. What color is the water is in the
      blue part of the rainbow?... Food for thought.

    • @Calucig
      @Calucig 5 років тому +9

      @Rebirth Vessel
      That's also not the point OP stated.
      The problem of this video is that they STATE that our eyes are being tricked that certain animals are not blue.
      Both definitions are wrong.
      You could go into a philosophical discussion and state that nothing, living or not, is really of a certain color. Things simply reflect lightwaves and we can see a certain range of them.
      A more correct statement would be that Animals don't usually produce blue pigments, but are blue because of their physical structures.
      And saying that our eyes are trick is clickbait. At the end of the day we see blue, whether it's reflected by a pigment or by a physical structure.

    • @Icewind007
      @Icewind007 5 років тому +5

      That's not the same. Plants are green because they absorb all the light but green, and re-emit green photons.
      The butterfly does not do this. It changes the color of the light AFTER it was already re-emitted. It's like wearing a color filter over your eyes and saying that everything is that color. This would not be true.
      If you were to finely grind a butterfly wing enough to break it's structure, it would not make a blue dust. If you grind a plant, it will still be green.

    • @sophonax661
      @sophonax661 5 років тому

      @@Icewind007
      Sure, I know that. That's the difference between pigment and surface structure but either way the composition of light waves is altered which causes the effect of color perception. It doesn't make sense to call one a "trick" and not the other. Color perception is as much depending on the structure of the eye and the neuronal processing in the brain as it is depending on the object itself. The retina already changes its input (highlights contrasts, f.e.) before the brain "sees" anything and the brain only perceives a very small part of reality to begin with.
      One could argue the color yellow is more "tricky" than non-pigment-blue since we have no receptor for yellow and only "interpret" a red-green-mixture as yellow.
      As another person already stated it is almost a philosophical discussion what makes a "real" color "real" and a "fake" one "fake".

  • @TT-nk3ho
    @TT-nk3ho 4 роки тому +15

    Me watching this with my blue eyes:
    🧿👄🧿

  • @Kichu-lt1sw
    @Kichu-lt1sw 5 років тому +192

    Is my Blue same as your blue?
    *VSauce music intensifies*

    • @Chunderthunder420
      @Chunderthunder420 5 років тому

      @Lord Bolton well how do you know those colors are actually the ones youve named. what if you think its blue but its actually green but you dont know. two people could point at the color blue and be thinking/seeing different colors and think its blue because thats what theyve been told.

    • @sigalroman8547
      @sigalroman8547 5 років тому

      Im seeing green 😂

    • @derekgo611
      @derekgo611 5 років тому

      Lol

    • @GriseWeisshark
      @GriseWeisshark 5 років тому +1

      *Hey Vsauce! Michael here.*

    • @ngocninh02
      @ngocninh02 5 років тому

      200

  • @1Poxxxx
    @1Poxxxx 5 років тому +191

    How is this different from the Way Pigments absorb a percentage of the wavelengths to form a color? I mean what makes directional reflection vs Absorption real or fake? Isn't the end result the same? 500mn photons hitting your retina?

    • @jaredsmith112
      @jaredsmith112 5 років тому +21

      thePoxxxx yes that’s the real conceit of this video

    • @ho2cultcha
      @ho2cultcha 5 років тому +10

      exactly!

    • @jacquescousteau4592
      @jacquescousteau4592 5 років тому +35

      Exactly, it is just a bunch of pretentious scientists.

    • @flower_k8713
      @flower_k8713 5 років тому

      it's too deep

    • @arr165
      @arr165 5 років тому +20

      I was wondering the same. I guess the clear blue pigment is rare is what they meant. But that don't really disregards the workaround animals found.
      I would like to know more about why the pigment is so rare. Are blue eyes in humans are "actually blue"?

  • @psalm8306
    @psalm8306 4 роки тому +22

    "If you can't trust your own eyes, what can you trust?"
    That hit me hard

  • @muz3226
    @muz3226 5 років тому +118

    so the title is wrong, animals can be blue but it's very rare

  • @IsabelleBoiten
    @IsabelleBoiten 5 років тому +103

    ‘Animals can’t be blue’
    Olivewing butterfly & blue poison dart frog:
    ‘well... *I’m blue da boo dee da boo daay* ’

  • @atinahull216
    @atinahull216 4 роки тому +51

    2:25 "don’t worry it dries back to blue"
    Me: ohhh so it is blue?

    • @meepotello626
      @meepotello626 3 роки тому +1

      Fake blue because if it was a real blue the colors won't change even if alcohol was added because the actual blue pigment is there ...but in this case , it was a fake blue because once they added that drop of alcohol it suddenly changes to somewhat green

  • @robbitt
    @robbitt 5 років тому +105

    Since when is pigment the only true form of color? Blue created by pigment or light is still blue. The color spectrum is created by light wavelengths. Are we now supposed to believe these aren't true colors because there's no pigment? There's no blue in a rainbow? Color created by light is no less real than color created by pigment.

    • @alessandropolicarpo
      @alessandropolicarpo 5 років тому +11

      At the end, we only see things through light. Light is much more important than pigments.

    • @GuerrillaVanity
      @GuerrillaVanity 5 років тому +4

      color in light is different than color in pigment, both also interact differently among themselves. For example red and green light make yellow light and red and green pigment makes a brown pigment. It's not that something isn't blue because it doesn't contain blue pigments. it's that it isn't truly blue. A black person with albinism is still black, but their skin color isn't truly black because it lacks the pigmentation. You would still refer to that person as black but you would also acknowledge that they don't have pigmented skin. that's pretty much what is going on here. it doesn't really make a difference, but it does raise the question to why blue pigmentation is very uncommon.

    • @aliyahabrahams2071
      @aliyahabrahams2071 5 років тому

      Exactly

    • @WmsYTpage
      @WmsYTpage 4 роки тому +1

      I think what’s being explained here concerns additive color vs. subtractive color:
      In additive color terms, light combines itself and projects a wavelength, such as in electronic displays or using the the rgb (red/green/blue) spectrum. Full-spectrum lighting (daylight) holds all the waveforms to carry all colors. Warm light only projects more golden-carrying waveforms, fluorescent projects more blue-carrying waveforms, etc.. Some materials (such as clear water or atmosphere) dont hold actual pigment, but more strongly refract blue waveforms.
      Subtractive color is based around what actual particles a material contains that absorb all wavelengths except for the one it reflects, which we regard as it’s color. An example would be in paint color or printing ink (the CMYK, or cyan/magenta,yellow, blue spectrum) It “subtracts” the waveforms, leaving us with the color impression that is then carried by the additive light source.
      Ive been trying to get my head around this for years, and am still wrestling with it. If my explanation is incorrect or if someone has a more clear way of explaining it, please share.

  • @ananefrimpongnicholas7824
    @ananefrimpongnicholas7824 4 роки тому +2

    Drops green alcohol on butterfly wings.
    Butterfly: yoo, chill bro, I'm still blue

  • @KateeAngel
    @KateeAngel 5 років тому +67

    Animals: we still appear blue!
    Cyanobacteria: hold my phycocyanin

  • @joharpaul3
    @joharpaul3 5 років тому +560

    Blue whale disliked the video.

    • @bachlamtung5131
      @bachlamtung5131 5 років тому +12

      As if they're "blue"

    • @joharpaul3
      @joharpaul3 5 років тому +77

      @WaitingToFadeThey identify themselves as blue, your calling them grey is an act of violence.

    • @mrslick58
      @mrslick58 5 років тому +3

      I laughed way too hard at this 😂😂

    • @jamesbee6983
      @jamesbee6983 5 років тому +2

      Whales aren’t animals

    • @Yashyennam
      @Yashyennam 5 років тому

      I was searching the comment with blue whale. I was not disappointed.

  • @xlur4027
    @xlur4027 4 роки тому +24

    “Animals cannot be blue”
    Blue Jay’s: Am I a joke to u?

    • @vermillionz
      @vermillionz 3 роки тому

      You probably didn't understand the video

  • @Junyoung_Kang
    @Junyoung_Kang 5 років тому +132

    What about my eyes. I have blue eyes. Are my eyes also tricking others and myself that it appears blue?

    • @HenriqueSantosCosta
      @HenriqueSantosCosta 5 років тому +55

      Actually, yes. There's no blue pigment in your eyes. Iris color is due to variable amounts of eumelanin (brown/black melanins) and pheomelanin (red/yellow melanins) produced by melanocytes. More of the former is found in brown-eyed people and of the latter in blue and green-eyed people.

    • @Junyoung_Kang
      @Junyoung_Kang 5 років тому +4

      @@HenriqueSantosCosta so everyone technically has brown/black eyes

    • @HenriqueSantosCosta
      @HenriqueSantosCosta 5 років тому +12

      @@Junyoung_Kang You said you have blue eyes, so it means there are some red/yellow pigment in your iris, and less of brown.
      I think there's a video from It's OK To Be Smart about this.

    • @shameenas5188
      @shameenas5188 5 років тому +60

      Try pouring in some alcohol, who knows, maybe it'll turn green

    • @ninaturtle7554
      @ninaturtle7554 5 років тому +4

      @@shameenas5188 😂😂😂😂 I cant your comment is hilarious

  • @alexanderadams6473
    @alexanderadams6473 5 років тому +31

    2:36
    “All birds that appear blue have some structure in their feathers that reflects only blue light”
    That is how you describe a colour. For example, you look at a green apple. The apple absorbs all light except green, which it reflects into our eyes for us to see. So they are blue because that’s how colour works.

    • @jolenemathews
      @jolenemathews 4 роки тому +2

      Imagine, if you will, each cell on the surface of the feather to be a series of grates. Devoid of any colour of their own, but capable of diffracting light to display a variety of colours in the similar wavelengths (here, blue).

    • @jolenemathews
      @jolenemathews 4 роки тому +5

      If this top layer of feathers was chopped up into a fine dust, they may not reflect blue anymore. Why? Because the sole reason it looked blue was because of the specific shape of the cells. Meanwhile if you chopped the blue part of the true blue butterfly, it would reflect blue, regardless of the angle or intensity of light

    • @krste3000
      @krste3000 3 роки тому +1

      Thats false. The green apple has a green pigment aka chlorophyll. It works that way with most colors aside from blue with the exceptions of things that actually have the blue pigment.

    • @pedroadonish
      @pedroadonish 3 роки тому +1

      @@krste3000 The blue pigment also "uses physics" to reflect only blue wavelenghts and make us perceive it as blue. They're calling some animals "fake blue" without knowing the very definition of a color.

  • @milyramirez4538
    @milyramirez4538 4 роки тому +17

    *natgeo:* animals CAN'T be blue.
    *that one blue bird my aunt has:* am i a joke to you.

    • @vermillionz
      @vermillionz 3 роки тому +2

      You probably didn't understand the video

  • @HereForTheComments
    @HereForTheComments 5 років тому +54

    So "fake blue" is when you cancel out other colors to reflect only blue light? Isn't that how all colors are? "Real blue" is when only blue light is reflected, isn't it? Just like "real red" is when only red light is reflected.

    • @JMRabil675
      @JMRabil675 5 років тому +11

      Thats what Im saying. Nature has found multiple ways to make colors, but our eyes still perceive it as blue. All colors are pretty much certain wavelengths of light ... Which is exactly how the 'fake blue' works aswell lol... Its just so utterly moronic I cant breathe

    • @Icewind007
      @Icewind007 5 років тому +4

      Blue light is blue light. When light hits something, it absorbs that light and re-emits it as the color of the object. But if something else between you and the object changes the color (like colored glass), then that color you see is no longer the color of the object. This is what is happening for most animals. They have something else that messes with the light, but it does not absorb and emit that light again, so it's not the animal's color.

    • @HereForTheComments
      @HereForTheComments 5 років тому +1

      @@Icewind007 But they're not using anything like colored glass. Colored glass or rose tinted glasses, I can look at a bowl of milk and know that the milk isn't red. But if the milk itself shifts around somehow and appears red? Why isn't it red?

  • @elizabeth712
    @elizabeth712 5 років тому +77

    This is getting too meta if it looks blue it’s blue

    • @Blue_Azure101
      @Blue_Azure101 5 років тому +3

      Eggy Egggs pigment vs crystal; there’s a difference

    • @theviniso
      @theviniso 5 років тому +6

      That butterfly looks very not blue from some angles, so it's probably not blue.

    • @sammangiaracina9360
      @sammangiaracina9360 5 років тому +4

      @@Blue_Azure101 there's a difference in how the color is achieved yes, but that doesn't mean that it isn't still that color. color is just a wavelength of light. if that wavelength is present, that color is present.

  • @venessasilveira8874
    @venessasilveira8874 4 роки тому +6

    Me: Scrolling through UA-cam videos.
    Nat Geo: Don’t trust your eyes.

  • @farhantanvir6091
    @farhantanvir6091 5 років тому +71

    Doesn't matter in which way it's blue...if it appears blue to the eyes its blue

    • @Icewind007
      @Icewind007 5 років тому +2

      So if I attach a blue filter to your face, you'll call everything blue?

    • @midnight8341
      @midnight8341 5 років тому +15

      @@Icewind007 no, he will call the blue filter blue, because he's not an idiot and knows that obstacles in the line of sight can impede with perceiving visual reality as it is...
      If I slap my hand across your face, will you say that EVERYTHING hurts?

    • @jim123bcbhd9
      @jim123bcbhd9 5 років тому +4

      @@midnight8341 nice comeback, I laughed so hard

    • @midnight8341
      @midnight8341 5 років тому

      @@jim123bcbhd9 thanks xD

    • @fluxpistol3608
      @fluxpistol3608 5 років тому +1

      Icewind007 awesome example! I had someone argued the sky was pink once because they had pink glasses on. They wouldn’t accept that it was blue. Still to this day without the glasses the claim the sky was pink.... *facepalm*

  • @siennarichards7592
    @siennarichards7592 5 років тому +228

    *PAPPA SMURF HAS LEFT THE CHAT*

  • @srishtighosh2083
    @srishtighosh2083 4 роки тому +3

    *This blue my mind.*

  • @Sckarmax
    @Sckarmax 5 років тому +46

    Yo, listen up, here's a story
    About a little guy that lives in a blue world
    And all day and all night and everything he sees is just blue
    Like him inside and outside
    Blue his house with a blue little window and a blue Corvette
    And everything is blue for him
    And himself and everybody around
    'Cause he ain't got nobody to listen (to listen)

  • @briesangle1715
    @briesangle1715 5 років тому +36

    *”you cant trust ur own eyes, so what can you trust?”* national geographic? 😂😂

    • @ykMasiH
      @ykMasiH 5 років тому

      Donald Trump news we can trust

    • @cmntkxp
      @cmntkxp 5 років тому

      Real pigment color or diffraction is the question

    • @AmalDevYT
      @AmalDevYT 5 років тому +1

      *National Geographic

    • @Qui-9
      @Qui-9 5 років тому

      What color are the water droplets in the blue part of the rainbow?... What color is a glass of water?

    • @eidrag
      @eidrag 5 років тому +2

      youtube comment sections

  • @prodbykodiak
    @prodbykodiak 4 роки тому +10

    But can’t you just say the same about all the other colours? “Green is just the way the light is reflected into your eye”

    • @jolenemathews
      @jolenemathews 4 роки тому

      Diffraction =/= Reflection

    • @jolenemathews
      @jolenemathews 4 роки тому

      They did a bad job in explaining diffraction,

    • @meepotello626
      @meepotello626 3 роки тому

      But many animals actually has those green pigment in their cells while the blue pigment is very rare and often what our eyes perceived as blue doesn't have those blue pigment in them but only appears blue to our eyes because of how light was filtered

  • @bheronz
    @bheronz 5 років тому +40

    National Geographic : Animals can't be blue!
    Animals that are blue : Hold my beer.

  • @CarthagoMike
    @CarthagoMike 5 років тому +17

    since many people are talking about 'it appears blue so it is blue' let me clear this up a bit:
    A 'true blue' in this context is a colour which will _be_ blue regardless of the conditions it is in, like a pigmented blue.
    A 'perceived' blue is when something _appears_ (aka is perceived) as blue in a certain condition, for example with the light-reflection of the Butterfly in the video.
    It might look 'blue' under the right light condition, but its inherent colour isn't blue.

    • @HenriqueSantosCosta
      @HenriqueSantosCosta 5 років тому +5

      I am shocked by all those stupid comments. How hard is it to understand? I can only imagine the frustration of the NatGeo team who made this nice video.
      I wish your comment would be displayed at the top. Maybe it could clarify things a little to some people.

    • @dotdash2284
      @dotdash2284 8 місяців тому

      This is not how colour works because if I shine red light on something blue it will look red
      Inherent colour isn't real
      Is a blue flame really blue or is there just blue light coming from the plasma?
      Colour is based only on perception, not innate properties

  • @rebeccatom2188
    @rebeccatom2188 4 роки тому +32

    "Blue butterflies only Reflect blue light! Not actually blue"
    "Yeah so thts how color works"

    • @kiruthikabalasubramani8874
      @kiruthikabalasubramani8874 4 роки тому +1

      The actual pigment for blue color lacks there I guess...

    • @rebeccatom2188
      @rebeccatom2188 4 роки тому +1

      @@kiruthikabalasubramani8874 hmmm yeah i guess so

    • @meepotello626
      @meepotello626 3 роки тому

      Just like the ocean , it appears blue but it's really not . Because we all know water is not blue but the way lights are reflected to our eyes makes it look like blue , hence a fake blue .

    • @rebeccatom2188
      @rebeccatom2188 3 роки тому

      @@meepotello626 the ocean actually is blue, if you go to the really deep depths, the only wavelength that can penetrate it is blue :D

    • @meepotello626
      @meepotello626 3 роки тому

      @@rebeccatom2188 nope it's not.. whatever you're trying to say it's not . Infact light gets filtered out and makes the ocean appear blue doesn't make it blue cause water is not blue

  • @EmanuelGaldr
    @EmanuelGaldr 5 років тому +12

    But... aren’t ALL local colors reflected light? Therefore, isn’t it true that what the video calls “pigment” is also a compound with a physical structure that absorbs all the other visible frequencies of light and only reflects the part of spectrum we perceive as blue?

    • @justinequizon7257
      @justinequizon7257 4 роки тому +1

      the butterfly isn't blue but it's all the colors except blue. I think that is what NATGEO wants to tell us

    • @jolenemathews
      @jolenemathews 4 роки тому +2

      They keep saying 'reflect' instead of 'refract'. The video was badly made. What they should've said was 'there are microscopic, prism-like cells on the surface of Morpho Butterfly wings, that *refract* blue light. Unlike the Olive Wing Butterfly which absorbs all other wavelengths of light and *reflects* blue

    • @pedroadonish
      @pedroadonish 3 роки тому

      Yes. They're probably thinking that the rare "blue pigments" have LEDs attached on them to produce blue light and not just reflect it, like what they call "fake blue".

    • @justinhowe3878
      @justinhowe3878 3 роки тому

      @@jolenemathews That doesn't change the fact that whatever we experience as blue is blue, because blue is the name of an experience, not an objective attribute of things.

  • @AzlianaLyana
    @AzlianaLyana 5 років тому +570

    My life has been a lie! Such is the tricks of nature. Amazing. That's some real study well done. Thanks NG

    • @Bibibosh
      @Bibibosh 5 років тому +5

      Azliana Lyana David attenborough lied to us. “the blue planet 2010”

    • @Bibibosh
      @Bibibosh 5 років тому +1

      Joe T gravity, objects.... go figure

    • @hotpockets2224
      @hotpockets2224 5 років тому

      oh oh baby girl i been looking for u my whole life baby ur so beautiful girl i wanna make you my lady my real pretty woman waiting for me in a satin bathrobe embroidered with your name in the color blue
      lemme be the sugar daddy in ur blueberry pie

    • @gordondsouza7136
      @gordondsouza7136 5 років тому

      The blue eyes of human aren't blue either, you can go have a check.

    • @adronator
      @adronator 5 років тому

      Joe T What?

  • @cambedak6510
    @cambedak6510 4 роки тому +10

    Nat Geo:
    No one is blue.
    Me every Sunday night:
    Am I a joke to you?

  • @tamannad5107
    @tamannad5107 5 років тому +28

    There are no blue foods.
    Haha! Tell that to Percy

  • @lemlee2809
    @lemlee2809 5 років тому +40

    no foods are blue?? so blue berrys are a lie?

    • @lovejustifiesexistence
      @lovejustifiesexistence 5 років тому +11

      maybe you should drop a little alcohol on them. you will see they turn a yellowish green

    • @Katkiwi25
      @Katkiwi25 5 років тому +10

      Lieberries!

    • @manjensen1710
      @manjensen1710 5 років тому +1

      You can trust in Lactarius indigo.

    • @ryno1509
      @ryno1509 5 років тому

      Blueberries have never been Blue they’re purple

    • @teee.y
      @teee.y 5 років тому

      they be purple

  • @gentlestickman3680
    @gentlestickman3680 4 роки тому +10

    So basically true blue animals are very rare...
    *BUT THEY STILL EXIST.*

  • @superjgalmeida
    @superjgalmeida 5 років тому +18

    Of course whe cannot trust our eyes... people with blindness know this quite well. But, if we see blue... it's blue. This relativism really get me tired sometimes...

    • @midnight8341
      @midnight8341 5 років тому

      I think the "you can't trust your eyes" only applies to somewhat functional ones...
      It's kind of a default-thing...

  • @pbp6741
    @pbp6741 5 років тому +213

    Your own video contradicts your title.

    • @hear-and-know
      @hear-and-know 5 років тому +6

      They just wanted to talk about wavelengths 🤷

    • @zaim.marzuki
      @zaim.marzuki 5 років тому +6

      That's called clickbait. You new to youtube?

    • @blackwater7183
      @blackwater7183 5 років тому

      Nat Geo has mastered the art of clickbait.

  • @royaldeer87
    @royaldeer87 4 роки тому +6

    Blue Jays: *exists*
    Me: am I a joke to u

  • @RosinGoblin
    @RosinGoblin 5 років тому +27

    Now listen up here's a story..

    • @lovejustifiesexistence
      @lovejustifiesexistence 5 років тому +2

      i'm blue. da ba dee da ba dai

    • @denisenova7494
      @denisenova7494 5 років тому +3

      Of a little guy who lives in a blue world...

    • @Maryam-qx9kp
      @Maryam-qx9kp 5 років тому +1

      And all day and all night and everything he sees is just blue like him..

  • @krishap9700
    @krishap9700 5 років тому +29

    Woah my profile picture i took last summer is a lie😱

  • @Sherburtz
    @Sherburtz 4 роки тому +5

    im looking at my blue parrot and questioning everything

  • @KingBongHogger
    @KingBongHogger 5 років тому +154

    They pretty much said blue animals don't exist and then showed blue animals.
    Cool.

    • @graelonsalvador2248
      @graelonsalvador2248 5 років тому +8

      You even listened to their explanation?

    • @matthewsconnor8075
      @matthewsconnor8075 5 років тому +3

      KingBongHogger “blue foods don’t exist” blueberries literally have blue in their name

    • @KingBongHogger
      @KingBongHogger 5 років тому +2

      @@graelonsalvador2248 Yeah. It was one giant contradiction.

    • @nestorv7627
      @nestorv7627 5 років тому +1

      @@graelonsalvador2248 sounds like you were the one who didnt listen

    • @alexia3993
      @alexia3993 5 років тому

      ye

  • @OceanGang732
    @OceanGang732 5 років тому +429

    blue birds are blue

    • @nlloyd6845
      @nlloyd6845 5 років тому +48

      Actually no. They only appear blue.

    • @Worldofourown2024
      @Worldofourown2024 5 років тому +27

      @@nlloyd6845 Not even bluejays? The computer isn't blue either, it just falsely appears blue when it shows sky, ocean, and some birds.

    • @joeinthebush
      @joeinthebush 5 років тому +4

      I have little blue spotted lizzard looking things...salamnders i think..they're all over the boreal forest...

    • @AndreasDelleske
      @AndreasDelleske 5 років тому +22

      n lloyd They are also not birds. They just appear to be birds. This is due to their So-Beingness.

    • @Narsuaq
      @Narsuaq 5 років тому +14

      @@nlloyd6845 don't all colours appear to be what they are? 🤔

  • @neelima6460
    @neelima6460 4 роки тому +3

    Now we can officially rename blue as Great Royal Blue..

  • @MidnightBloomDev
    @MidnightBloomDev 5 років тому +64

    Actually they can but choose not to. They are strong independent butterflies.

  • @flaminup
    @flaminup 5 років тому +48

    After watching this video i told my mom that blue is not actually blue... she hit me with her chancla on my face, now i see blue everywhere

    • @DianaGPCH
      @DianaGPCH 5 років тому +2

      I'm DEAAAAD 😂😂😂😂😂

    • @isabelody8554
      @isabelody8554 5 років тому

      Was the chancla blue?

  • @thehwatcha733
    @thehwatcha733 4 роки тому +7

    My childhood movie "Rio" fooled me :,(

  • @flfun2no
    @flfun2no 5 років тому +71

    "There are no blue foods." Oh, well then what color is a blueberry?

    • @theviniso
      @theviniso 5 років тому +38

      Purple

    • @player_8823
      @player_8823 5 років тому +7

      Yellow

    • @mistrex
      @mistrex 5 років тому +9

      plane

    • @tricksor6589
      @tricksor6589 5 років тому +21

      Color is a device made by the government to deceive us into thinking that life is great when in reality, colors are small devices that are implanted in the back of your eyes at birth and only government officials know. If they leak the secret they are executed. Don't believe the government's lies! Open your eyes guys!

    • @novidsnosubs9758
      @novidsnosubs9758 5 років тому +8

      I believe they mean no food can be scientifically referred to as blue as it does not contain blue pigment. Please rewatch the video.

  • @aniketsharma8851
    @aniketsharma8851 5 років тому +8

    If something absorbs all the light and reflects only blue then doesn't it mean that its blue ?

  • @nroman_p
    @nroman_p 5 років тому +26

    Blueberry: *exists*
    NatGeo: There are no blue foods
    Blueberry: Hey
    NatGeo: There are no blue foods

  • @teeblackgold97
    @teeblackgold97 5 років тому +51

    This is why Super Saiyan Blue is the strongest form!

  • @megz2708
    @megz2708 4 роки тому +17

    NATgeo: there's no blue animals
    Also NATgeo:shows a picture of an insect.

  • @PrettybuoyJones1992
    @PrettybuoyJones1992 4 роки тому +2

    Blue is my favorite color,I'm crushed...

  • @fireflymiesumae
    @fireflymiesumae 4 роки тому +4

    If they're not blue. What color is it then? Does that also mean there is no such thing as blue eyes?

  • @MrDeanAZ
    @MrDeanAZ 5 років тому +6

    I'm confused now... isn't that the whole concept of color... and it's not a trick but rather just the way it works... and say red colors look red because of the way it reflects the light? I mean... ok, blue... reflects only blue light, appearing blue to us... isn't that just how it works? What am I missing? The diff between true blue pigments and these structures... I still don't quite understand!! Frustrating... :/

    • @21dzz
      @21dzz 5 років тому

      me too ...

    • @Arctic022
      @Arctic022 5 років тому

      The final words of the video are the "simplified" explanation. Blue pigment means that no matter how you look at it (i.e., no matter what condition it's in) it will always be blue. Conversely, the "fake blue" only appears that way under the right circumstances.

  • @ljfdrummer100
    @ljfdrummer100 Рік тому +1

    "to cancel out other colors, reflecting only blue." Isnt that how literally all other surfaces get color. A leaf is only green, because it absorbs all other wavelengths except green.

  • @jy2693
    @jy2693 5 років тому +10

    3:59
    what about blueberries?

    • @igorbukhantsov
      @igorbukhantsov 5 років тому

      Bingo!!!!!!

    • @upsilon9407
      @upsilon9407 5 років тому

      Blueberries aren't actually blue, but deep purple, which is the color of anthocyanin, a pigment that is especially rich in blueberries

  • @lepitenjohnlestermarikit8782
    @lepitenjohnlestermarikit8782 5 років тому +14

    4:15 maybe not the nature lie to us maybe it's science

  • @riverphoenixhenzi7943
    @riverphoenixhenzi7943 4 роки тому +15

    NatGeo: “Animals cannot be blue”
    Dory: *am I a joke to u?*

  • @nootnootnootok
    @nootnootnootok 4 роки тому +3

    4:27 “if we cant trust our own eyes”
    Bruh its not like they’re gonna stab you in the back when your not looking

  • @jeppemadsen2310
    @jeppemadsen2310 5 років тому +24

    So, the Blue Whale is just plain old Whale?

  • @user-fb2mh6oj1b
    @user-fb2mh6oj1b 4 роки тому +4

    “animals cannot be blue”
    *Perry the platypus* : am i a joke to you

  • @shivangikansal8025
    @shivangikansal8025 5 років тому +4

    Everyone seems to have missed the point of the video. It's not that blue is rare in nature. The sky is blue, so are several butterflies, birds, spiders, even some fruits. Still, this question arises quite often, and the main reason is the rarity of "blue pigments" in nature.
    They appear blue due to their certain structure but do not themselves contain any blue pigment. Biological pigments are mainly organic compounds that selectively absorb incoming light and reflect the remaining wavelengths appearing as color. It is different from structural color.

  • @nejihyuuga.
    @nejihyuuga. 4 роки тому +5

    *There's no blue bird*
    Blu from rio: am i a joke to you?

  • @oykumelissari
    @oykumelissari 4 роки тому +1

    Hiacinth Macaw: Am I joke to you?

  • @ollystables4886
    @ollystables4886 5 років тому +16

    *This guy hasn’t watched the Smurfs*

  • @jasonhuang8068
    @jasonhuang8068 5 років тому +16

    I'm blue daba dee daba die da daba dee daa

    • @theviniso
      @theviniso 5 років тому +1

      Chances are you're not actually blue, just appears to be.

  • @intansabrinasaad
    @intansabrinasaad 4 роки тому +1

    Peacock: am I a joke to you?

  • @blackheartstring5261
    @blackheartstring5261 4 роки тому +4

    Lol what if the other colors were just actually "reflection of light." And they're actually blue

  • @entropyburst4882
    @entropyburst4882 5 років тому +38

    No ones talking about Smurfs...

  • @ybeys
    @ybeys 4 роки тому +2

    I hate when they say ‘ aminals USE tricks’ like they dont say ‘oh let me make myself look like blue’ its just natural selection or something

  • @perritos24mpj16
    @perritos24mpj16 5 років тому +8

    When you see a color in a surface, it's because that surface is reflecting only that color and absorbing the rest. That's basically what color is. That's what you call a color. So if it only reflects blue, then it's blue. So I don't see your point.

    • @jolenemathews
      @jolenemathews 4 роки тому +2

      A true blue pigment will absorb all visible colours except for blue, which is reflected back to our eyes.
      If we took the blue part of the Olive Wing Butterfly, cut it up into a fine dust, and then viewed it again, we would still see blue.
      The dust remains blue because the material still absorbs all light and still reflects the wavelength that we see as blue.