What weapons can Israel use to retaliate against Iran?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 15 тра 2024
- Go to ground.news/binkov to stay fully informed. Subscribe through my link for 40% off unlimited access this month.
This video explores the weapons Israel has at its disposal, if it's to directly retaliate against Iran. It also covers the aircraft and range issues that might impact Israel's choices when it comes to attacking Iran.
00:00 Intro to topic
01:11 Aircraft & cruise missiles
04:50 Other, smaller options
07:20 Aircraft range
09:20 Ground launched weapons
11:11 Submarine strikes
12:27 Conclusion
Music by Matija Malatestinic www.malatestinic.com
If you want to watch our videos without ads, if you want quick replies to any questions you might have, if you want early access scripts and videos, monthly release schedules - become our Patron.
More here: / binkov
You can also browse for other Binkov merch, like T-Shirts, via the store at our website, binkov.com
Subscribe to Binkov's channel for more videos! / @binkov
Follow Binkov's news on Facebook! / binkovsbattlegrounds
Follow us on Twitter: / commissarbinkov
Go to ground.news/binkov to stay fully informed. Subscribe through my link for 40% off unlimited access this month.
F35 cant reach iran without usa air tankers
@@ZOV_VLAD_Combat.footage Israel got airbases in azerbaijan, so it can reach. And israel also got air tankers.
😊
Don't you think your first sentence is a bit misleading? 1. It was a weak, telegraphed attack on purpose. 2. it was a response to Israel striking their embassy in Syria and killing a general. Did you just not know that this started with the Israeli strike on the Iranian embassy in Syria??? You should repost this and add context right before it opens. Cause you certainly don't want to unwittingly post misinformation, do you?
Thay had tanker support from the usaf on top of iraq
There's a tanker flying in Iraq before the night
KC-135 stratotanker AE0592 look it up on ADS exchange
I remember the days when Binkov was about “theoretical” conflicts.. sad
The real Blinkov Battleground is always in the comments section.
Good luck avoiding UA-cams auto delete filter.
To prove my point: Israel can never defeat Iran because they're terrified of Iran and their power.
@@Sunopeek Israel has nukes though i think between 80-400. Even if iran had nukes, they may not have the capability to launch them but lets say they did, the iron dome alongside with other air defence systems in israel could shoot down the nuke let alone how many middle eastern countries suck at aiming atleast in terms of iran proxies im assuming so iran may struggle with that but these are not confirmed so yea. Both militaries are just too weak for each other so neither would really win atleast in terms of invasion but yea i think israel would win overall.
@@spinoraptorspinosaurus6969
Iran is allied with Pakistan, who is a nuke country and is no friend of Israel.
Irans attack showed it can strike anywhere in Israel, provided it launches enough cheap decoys first to deplete Israel's defenses.
Iran can tank several WMD hits and survive. Israel can't afford one.
@@spinoraptorspinosaurus6969
Irans strike showed it just needs to launch 300 cheap decoys to overwhelm Israeli defenses to allow between 14-40 missiles to penetrate the defenses. And that's with the whole world defending it.
In an all-out war, if Iran launches 1200 cheap decoys, that's at least 56-160 guaranteed hits.
Those decoys target military targets like iron dome, arrow systems, F35 airbase, radars, and so on. So Israel CANT afford to not strike them down.
Israel will run out of interceptors before Iran runs out of missiles.
Israel most advanced weaponary can't defend against this scenario at the moment.
No kinetic war has ever been conducted through three buffer countries.
All of those 3 countries have Shia armed forces, especially Lebanon with Hezbollah's rocket stockpile, Israel is so small, a kinetic war is not needed to devastate it, and they both know it, imagine firing tens of thousands of rockets from Lebanon
The United States Flys B2 bombers all the way across the globe and back and Israel to Iran is only 2 countries.
Calling them countries is a stretch
Jordan and SAUDI ARABIA will allow Israel to fly that way even refuel before proceeding to Iran. I don't think Syria or Iraq will shoot towards Jordan or Saudi just to try to down planes. So the range would be a lot less far.
@@rubenthemastertech8631 “oy vey we’ll just violate goyim air space what are they going to do about it” this is exactly why you’re in the mess you’re in.
Binkov WW3 speedrun any%
WW3 has been happening for decades. It is just a slow burn war.
Both sides seem to be testing the limits. Neither side will go all out unless they're sure they can win.
Only one side has nuclear weapons and one side doesn't. There is no winning in that scenario
Israel has cca 50+ nukes. Some of those could be launched from a submarine. Need I say more?
Iran can go not all out and still manage to collapse the apartheid regime. But lets just avoid the obvious.
There is a high chance Iran is hiding the fact that it has nukes. Being public about that could cause unrest in the region and may bring about harsher sanctions & isolation including allies i.e Russia & China
@@Alex-hu5eg Both Iran's and Israel's nuclear capability is futile in this war. Israel can't win this war and Iran will certainly win this war. But Iran doesn't want to win a war against the apartheid regime it wants to win against the US which they are not capable of yet.
Popeye Turbo is a pretty badass missile name.
I live in Iraq, specifically in Baghdad, and we saw drones and cruise missiles passing from the sky
Is iraq currently ok? Is isis still there?
How high up where the drones? You think you could hit one with a commercial drone?
@@irfanrais8642The security situation in Iraq is very good, and there has been no ISIS for years, but the problem is that Iraq has no value now because after Saddam, it is in the hands of Iran and America, and it has no political, economic, or military decision-making power in the region.
@@brulsmurfThe American base in Baghdad responded and shot down dozens of Iranian drones, and they said they shot down 70 drones.
@@IRAQI_22 were the missiles and drones launched from Israel US made???
I heard rocks? Dropped from planes? And then i saw those were missles named Rocks, i almost spat out my tea...
What If WW2 was a three-way war (between the Allies, Axis and Soviets)
Soviets were slavic peoples mainly. The Nazis had horrible plans for them. So um they had every reason to be on our side the allies. Soviets were of diverse nationalities.
But if they split. Well we wouldn't really attack them as we are bust with Nazis. Soviets would still have to fight Nazis. Possibly same outcome... Nazism is a very racist ideology literally.
Fighting in two fronts isn't quite smart for the Red Army and Navy. They're contending with Japan bombing Vladivostok while Moscow and St. Petersburg r having trouble with more bombs. Azov will be attacked by Italian planes and ships. Does it make sense for Stalin? Ofc not. Both him and the Austrian painter will get couped tf out by their generals and admirals which might be the only rhing that can save their respective nations. Only Tojo and his Emperor won't worry about a coup or mutiny.
The Soviets would be f@cked
@@humanwithoutborders No they didn’t, and jewish communists killed more Slavs than the Germans did.
Bots out in force
Bots? None of the adversarial comments are even showing up because of censorship.
Thank you guys. Always appreciate the effort.
It was enjoyable to hear a real voice instead of that silly computer voice too many UA-camrs use. Good job.
A well made and informative episode. Well Done!
'Popeye Turbo' is a pretty cool codename for a missile.
Best military analysis channel
😂 his predictions are not even close to what happens in real life. Maybe he got a bad luck or he just says anything to get views
At least the weather will be nice as the mushroom clouds grow
Small hats clan at it again
But muh greatest ally!
I wonder if they realize they have no friends left in America, other than our bought politicians.
Good analysis! Thank you!
Love the timely video as always! But I was missing the miles to kilometers conversion a bit.
I hate it when they use miles. It’s difficult to immediately imagine what 570 miles looks like without having to stop and think about conversions. But I do understand the earth being a globe is divided into degrees of nautical miles. So somehow miles is a better fit.
Well i think you have underestimated the Rocks/Sparrow missiles family, which was used in the attack on Isfahan . No way it just has a 400 miles of range only .
They should be very silent families cuz no one has heard an impact haha
It's 2000 km
@@dodo19961375320 exactly lmao, sparrows aren’t even air-to-ground missiles so now you know they’re deffo lying about attacking Isfahan
Last time I checked, Jerusalem does not have a doomsday clock dedicated to its enemy's destruction, UNLIKE TEHRAN
Israel has been planning the complete destruction of Palestine since the 70’s. Your “check” is seriously flawed.
@@xsu-is7vqany evidence for this?
@iGoldenWax stop trying to argue evidence with religious fanatics it is exhausting
@@iGoldenWax just look up Likud party’s slogan since the 70’s.
@@iGoldenWaxseveral genocides and colonization efforts speak for themselves I would think, no?
Looks like you got most all of it right, nice job.
The bot parade has arrived
Very good video indeed!
Everything said including in the comments borders on speculation without any serious substantiation
What Israel has, only Israel knows and no one else - Israel has the most efficient technological development in the world - you even hinted at it when you introduced the suffix I on all Israeli aircraft
The suffix I shows the differences between, say, an American and Israeli F-35 plane - because the plane that Israel buys arrives naked without any features and undergoes a significant upgrade that even the American, Japanese and/or British plane does not have.
There is a significant reason for this, since the Americans also sell weapons to Israel's enemies, therefore, the weapons in Israel's hands, although of American origin, are completely different from the ones in the hands of other forces.
Apart from that, I would advise all enemies of Israel not to mess with Israel too much because in the end it will hurt the whole world. Therefore, in order for the world to be good, it is better to support Israel and hurt its enemies.
Wow quite interesting stuff
What a farce
>in the end it will hurt the whole world
What does this mean? Is that a threat? Samson option? Your war is none of our responsibility, fight it yourself. Leave everyone else out of it.
And finally they used 3 quadcopters 😂😂
And Iran couldn't defend against those😂?
That's not a huge amount of options.
Especially if wanting to limit risk of aircraft loss.
F35 can hit iran without entering Iranian airspace
Iran can show the world its terrifying arsenal of 1960s jets
@@John-bravooo doubtful Iranian radars could see 'em anyway.
F-35s can enter Iran quite safely, but their payload is quite limited. JDAM, SDB , maybe Delilah if they integrated the missiles with planes. That means all relatively small warheads, and limited in numbers. Which means limited damage...
You should do a video on Iran’s air defence systems I’m always seeing these government released clips of this new system in that new system but we never really know how many do they have, and how effective they are
I tried to use binkov when I went to McDonald's but no discount was given.
As soon as it started, it ended ,
You guys pulled an all nighter!
Agreed but it turns out nothing happened.
Thank you❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Submarines seem to have the best risk/effect profile. 🇮🇱 has ~6 fairly modern submarines that can launch missiles. If they would go all in, they could deliver ~100 cruise missiles.
Enough to make a point.
Take into consideration the fact that the location of submarines in this scenario is prescribed by geography, Iran's destroyers would already be in place, patrolling the potential launch site, it's a suicide mission for submarines, only if Israel would have an air superiority over this specific place in Indian ocean would it be possible
Iran would literally launch a hypersonic missile and destroy it the minute it comes to the surface lmao, also what are they gonna hit? All of Irans valuable bases are underground protected giant valleys and mountains not even the strongest JDAM or bunker buster could destroy them.
ZOG is in check-mate.
I’ll have to step in if this carries on
btw, post development, Airlines changed flight paths changed now. I was on DXB -> DUS flight and it clearly flew aver Egypt, Mediterranean and Istanbul where as other days it used to flew over Iraq and Turkey and black sea etc. Tense situation and hope things will easy up.
This may be all there is. It's rumored Netanyahu agreed to a limited response, if they can go harder at Rafah.
Haven't they already struck iran?
Can yiu do a full video on what will happen in an all out war between these 2?
He already has few years back.. australia would be screwed lol should be somewhere on the video list
Israel had indicated they were decommissioning the Jericho 2 ballistic missiles in 2026. I guess they might choose to use this asset rather than mothball them.
Stick a HIMARS M30A1 tungsten ball type of warhead on Jericho 2 and they could be an effective conventional weapon to hit soft targets at long range. Something like this could be an effective way of getting additional utility from older ballistic missiles as they are replaced by Jericho 3, probably for the nuclear role.
It's also a big question how those countries would react. I mean, the countries over which Israel and Iran are playing this missile/drone "volleyball". Their reaction to Iran's attack are noted. But will the do the same for Israel? If they allow Israel to do whatever they want, Iran might consider them as enemies cos they provided their airspace to the enemy for strike against Iran...
Overall, messy. I think most of these countries will act the same as they did before, keeping their neutrality. Maybe Iran is not capable of doing much damage to Israel, but to Iraq, Syria and Jordan, they would be much more successful.
The IDF would have to refuel over semi-hostile airspace, much of it controlled by the US. At the very least this would mean that any attack without explicit and official US support would be one and done. With Iran as a world leader in burying stuff in deep bunkers, it seems unlikely the IDF can do any significant damage at all, certainly not with only one shot at it with untried weapons.
Iran is fucked bro.
None of that airspace is controlled by the US, they're merely a foreign country and a guest in some of those countries.
Binkov, love your episodes! Keep up the good work. Too bad people get on here at just spit whatever venom they can that has nothing to do with the awesomeness of your channel.
Just a question that came to mind recently: who manufactures the drop tanks for fighter jets? Is it usually the manufacturer of the jet? And how many drop tanks might a plane go through during its service time? What is the price range of drop tanks? How often, if at all, are they recovered? How often are they retained by the air craft upon rtb? How many variations of drop tanks are used?
You're sounding a bit fatigued Blinkov. Too much going on these days, keeping you busy.
He's probably tired of reporting on all these western/American weapons outperforming and outclassing everything the "axis" has to offer(Iran, China, russia).
It always comforts me seeing in those comment sections how bad with facts Iranian supporters are.
Said people tend to increase in loudness every time Iran acts up, it happened on Oct 7th and may have partial connection to Iran directly.
“Oy vey 42 beheaded babies” turned out to be one baby, not beheaded.
And you want to talk about facts? Your people lie more than anyone else in the world.
Tell me about it
Apparently Iran has the advantage of escalatory dominance over Israel. The fact is: Warplanes were developed in the first world war and missiles in the second. Missiles are a newer technology and are superior to planes as they have longer range, do not risk pilots' lives and can penetrate robust air defenses.
You forgot the most likely used missiles in such an attack - sparrow missiles.
Damn Binkov, how did you manage to get the video out so fast?
Judging by the future tense, I think it was partly produced before the attack and then rushed out!
Because he is israel firster@@MrMikeBlakeney
Isreal tipped off Binkov before they attacked !
He’s a mystic with the ability to see the future.
Israel wants to force the issue, Iran has no interest in a direct confrontation. Israel wants a direct confrontation because they want their allies to do most of the fighting or at the very least carry the expense. Neither Israel or Iran by themselves can meaningfully do strategic level damage to each other. What Iran could do is essentially shut down the strait of Hormuz to add pressure. They can easily do this with just the threat of their drone missile etc arsenal. While strategically unappealing, it is an option. And cmon people, nukes? The use of nukes would be political suicide for any regime that uses them.
Iran has repeatedly said their intention is to destroy Israel and that nukes are legit. If they ever get nukes they will extort the whole world. The current regime there is religiously fanatic, they don't think like Westerners. The Iranians are patient and smart, but values like liberty, equality, freedom of speech, and peace are not valued like in the West
At this point i wouldnt not underestimate what the zinst regime is capable of. They would definately use nuks. Look at what was unleashed on the palstine people?
How you edit this that fast lol
I enjoy these channels for their historical perspectives. This really sucks that more and more we're talking about current events. Scary times
why there is no puppet in the video?
Prepare for the Future: Vault-Tec
WOW! Very interesting to listen and watch❤Thank you Sr.
A response to a response? this will never end this way will it?
Oiiiion I I. I I I. I hi I in I n in ini. Ini b ini n in in in I b in in I ni no non u in ini n i n in in I bin I in no I b in g
At the risk of repeating myself, I'm not entirely sure anything at all actually happened!
you could be right!!!
Nothing happened lmao
The BGM 109g Gryphon should've never been retired
The best weapon is the one you can keep a secret about . What do you think they can do ?
How about Jericho III? 😅
Rampage missiles is 4.7 meters long, and it cannot be carried inside F-35i weapons bay. However, Rampage has range of 150-200 km.., while Isfahan is 600 km from Iraq’s border. So, if it is not Popeye, not a Delilah, not Rampage.., then what was it? F-35 within 50 miles itself?
tip of the tech spear i d say test bed of field tested new gear
I thought the idea used to be to neutralise defenses with stealth bombers and then go in with the main attack?
The X factor is what did Russia give Iran in return for those drones. I wonder if the f-35 can penetrate the s-400 and I also wonder if they gave them hypersonic missiles
F-35 laughs at S-400
Often it have been remarked that the U.S doesn´t want a war with Iran precisely for not knowing what iranian forces does have.
@@stupidburp sounds good 👍
@@stupidburp f-35 is not even combat ready lol
@@trumpdrago517 fattah hypersonic is a missile, not a glide, different tech from russian glide. russia is the only country that cam pay iran for arms, rest are on credit bc they are not countries, they are proxies with no source of income
Thankfully the Iranian response has been 'Is that it?' and one side at least isn't trying to escalate, their last action of giving notice and causing almost no damage showed capability without gifting a cassus belli.
Either Binkov can make an entire video in about 8 hours, or this video was 90% complete, and they made some quick amendments this morning following Israel’s strike. 🧐
So far, quad copters vs. Ballistic missiles.
Why id Iraq indifferent that Iran and Israel keep violating it's airspace?
Iraq allowed access to shoot down Iranian missiles. Iran is a regional threat they have no friends.
Iraq lost most of its air defenses during Desert Storm.
Blame america.
@@benjaminbatema6963 Very true but that was about three decades ago- A very long time for a military not to re-equip. It is something Iraq has to consider if it is to have it's territory protected. The days of Saddam are long gone. Germany faced this sort of thing in the 50's when trying to determine it's new role in Europe. I think Iraq is in a position not much different.
@@joycekoch5746 esrl does a lot of talking but still like a village in iran ffs lol. so the question you need to ask is; how would any jet get to iraq? where and how would it refuel without 100s of bavar 373s watching esral? how could it avoid accidents with hundreds of flights without notifying air traffic systems? us and allies jets fly at the same altitudes at supersonic speeds. do you seriously think it's a like a car slamming on the brake when suddenly seeing an unidentified jet? and how would it fly back without fuel? lol
I believe Israel wanted to send a message while showing the western countries that they (Israel) can show some restraint.
I would LIKE to believe this. I fear hubris has pervaded top leadership though.
@@kurtwicklund8901 totally agree hubris will be a factor, and we must also learn that in human nature where the abused child grows up to be the same to which they hated at a younger age. If you look in the abyss too long the monster may become indistinguishable from yourself……
@@mawhaydenI think that October 7 humbled the hubris of military generals a bit. Which is good. But in every measure the abused child syndrome is absent. Israel is extremely humane. I also think that the next to the consulate building attack was a strategic choice since the dead officers are the ones literally in charge of coordinating all the proxies Iran built around Israel
Thanks for the video
nice
The Israeli attack came from Iran itself not Israel. The mossad had enough assets in the area to do the attack from inside the country. Israel has done similar attacks (some way bigger) in the Pat decade and Iran never responded
Not the first time I've heard this argument and it's hilarious when you consider the cost and effort required. Such a step to believe this over the more likely truth.
So you get it. Iran has been attacked several times and didnt respond until now. Ask yourself why they needed to respond? if it were any other western country embassy attacked there would be chaos
Russia China and others are very interested by how Israel managed to entered Iran and bombed military targets. They will study to try and improve their defective system.
Entered with what? DJI Drones? Lamo
They will launch the least expected mission.
Popeye Turbo really? 🤣 I'm dying
None, apparently. Nothing ever happens.
2 more weeks
Thank God.
Are your sure about that?
Bro. Have you been a sleep the last 4 years or somthing?
Popeye turbo! cool name
azerbaijan ? Surprised to you not mentioned the airfields & bases there considering their very close relationship
Iranian officials have claimed the city is at peace. So many mixed reports who knows. I also saw reports saying Iranian officials said drones were launched from inside iran..
They were launched from inside Iran,
US and Western support is a significant force multipler for Israel.
Meaning both sides are equally matched in pure firepower potential.
That's why neither side wants to escalate.
iran has next to no air force tho. marginalized after years of sanctions
west doesnt want mid east esculation because it would lead to huge disruption.. and no one knows how far and which countries would be involved in that.. ; not because iran has similar capability to whole of west and Israel.
@@Chadaface
Their drone warfare branch is no joke despite being simple. In defensive war, they are almost invincible inside Iranian territory.
Their airforce is gradually being upgraded with Russian and Chinese cooperation.
However, I was talking only about their missile force.
if that is so, then why did Jordan and Saudi Arabia also support Israel?
@@Conn30Mtenor They don't want WW3 to start. Nukes flying means radioactive clouds everywhere. Everyone in the region will suffer. Israel isn't the nation there with nukes.
How did you make this so fast??!! I guess we knew an israeli response was coming but still
It will be a new type of emp
Nothing ever happens bro
dunno, binkov did an hypothetical ir4n on 1srael attack months ago... very close to what actually happened..
may you live in interesting times ;)
Iran out here playing hot potato with a nuclear power.
Where are they going to ?
Aren't F35's still stealthy after drop tanks are unloaded ?
i got a pug and named it binkov!! Binkov the pug!!!!!
Who?
the video came out too late. Israel has already responded by destroying Iranian targets in Syria and Iraq as well as a small drone strike inside Iran itself likely carried out by Mossad.
Iran has downplayed the attack to not have to respond and tensions are likely to die down :D
its not in iran favor to start a war, they kinda winning by default hence why israel is more bold cause while it can't start a war itself if iran start it that another story and might be better then what currently happening.
i do think israel boldness is shortsighted and huge part of that is lack of composure there safest strat should be putting water on this whole thing and work on what they were doing before oct 7 building alliance and containing iran.
in respect iran seem better at being composed and tactically even when at first glance one would think they fanatics and should be the opposite.
@@rushyscoper1651it's much easier to think this way when you don't consider the proxy armies Iran has built. Israel is strategic, it will end Hamas in Rafah and then destroy Hezbollah in Lebanon (will finally have some more international leeway to do it now). Then they will be in a better position to destroy Iran's nuclear program, hopefully it won't be too late
Iran is politically a sinking ship 70% of the country want nothing to do with the IRGC and large swathes of the country are plagued by famine and drought. I have a lot of Iranian friends and they talk about the brain drain. Most intelligent people who could leave Iran left after the fall of the Shah.
Israel's problem is they have a leader in Netenyoyo who has no intention of ending hostilities just so he can stay in power and avoid indictment
Lol. What a joke. Big tough jews have to bomb the neighboring countries with no air defense after all the shit you were talking.
What about Israel's "EMP bomb" mentioned by some British and Israeli media? I ask because AFAIK this can only be a nuclear weapon and Russia and China are the only ones who have developed special nuclear weapons that maximize this NEMP effect (Super EMP).
I think what Israel has is a well kept secret.
Israel has been on this for a number of decades .
Finaly i see an intelligent person .we see eye to eye
Non nuclear EMP bombs exist the US used them in Iraq. They dont cover anywhere near the area of a nuclear weapon though.
Keep in mind that Irans mentality is the price, Israel spent well over a billion dollars in air defense to repel the Iranian attack.
i know they spend a lot on missiles... but a billion??
Yet it turns out that Israel did only knock out 84% not 99% as satellites were able to confirm it. While damage it unclear it just did says the number of missiles and drones been knocked out by Israel and their allies
1.35 billion by idf. Billions more by US a d UK 😅😅 @@halfalligator6518
each iron dome missile costs 50,000. so for it to cost a billion+ israel would need to intercept 200+.
@@pelegbaram7246
A billion is 1000x million so you're way off either way.
Your particular equation ($50,000 x 200) is only 10 million, which is 1% of a billion.
Anyway they probably used a lot more than iron dome. I'm guessing jet fighters did a lot of the work and they're expensive to fly.
Israel could choose go to Saudi Arabie or if possible to Kuwait refull and than go ti Iran !?
Saudi Arabia and Kuwait won't help especially with the genocide committed against Palestinians
@@SkippaMcHavnhopefully
What about Turbo Popeye with a range of 1500 km
The F35 can probably carry Spice glide bombs internally.
Remember, an F-35A has a huge array of long range sensors and advanced data compiling systems hidden inside it's airframe. They can be employed as forward command, surveillance and targeting platform while F-15s, and F-16s can fire their stand off weapons from further behind. It can just loiter deep in enemy territory and assume control of handed off stand off weapons
It all depends upon what kind of, if any, tanker aircraft Israel has. The US has plenty of tankers, notably the KC-46 & 135's, along with C-130's outfitted appropriately.
Hold on... why am i watching this again?
Israeli response?
I thought the Iranian strikes were the response..... Oh, wait!
THE IRANIAN STRIKE *WAAAAS* THE RESPONSE, WASN'T IT?!?!?!
Right on that's exactly what I'm saying
Iran is Houthis. Both are the same, like Wagner is Russia. Iran wants to attack civilian ships and then expect war. Iran is attacking the whole western world and China. 😂
Nope.
Depends how far you want to go back. Iran is the main funder and supplier to Israel's enemies.
@@user-dv7hq2rh4g take your selective memory and keep it on reddit, ya fucken ghoul.
We know this was a response to IAF bombings on the Iranian consulate in Damascus.
What? the iranians just supposed to sit back and take that??? IN WHAT FUCKING WORLD DOES THAT MAKE ANY FUCKING SENSE WHATSOEVER?!?!?!?
Wait where are the Russian bots?
Laughing of your desperation! Don´t open the champagne botles yet as you did in Ukraine cause you could have to run faster that you did in Afghanistan to hold in any departing peace of those aeroplanes in Kabul!
@@removilmata5377 as opposed to how you left Afghanistan? I saw your bloody trail out the door. You ran like cowards.
Does Irag have any air rights in this
this world is too stupid.