Infinite Geometric Series in a Square (visual proof without words) III
Вставка
- Опубліковано 23 лют 2024
- This is a short, animated visual proof demonstrating the infinite geometric series formula for any positive ratio 1-r with r less than 1 and with positive first term r. This series is important for many results in calculus, discrete mathematics, and combinatorics.
If you like this video, consider subscribing to the channel or consider buying me a coffee: www.buymeacoffee.com/VisualPr.... Thanks!
Also, check out my playlist on geometric sums/series: • Geometric Sums
This animation is based on a proof by Warren Page from the September 1981 issue of Mathematics Magazine ( page 201 ).
#mathshorts #mathvideo #math #calculus #mtbos #manim #animation #theorem #pww #proofwithoutwords #visualproof #proof #iteachmath #geometricsums #series #infinitesums #infiniteseries #geometric #geometricseries
To learn more about animating with manim, check out:
manim.community
______________________________
Music in this video:
Last Hero by Alex-Productions | onsound.eu/
Music promoted by www.free-stock-music.com
Creative Commons / Attribution 3.0 Unported License (CC BY 3.0)
creativecommons.org/licenses/...
As usual nice VISUALS to boost Assurance! Thanks
Thanks!
this is a great proof, but wonder if it might have been more illustrative to show the fractal effect by varying the length of r rather than just zooming in the camera?
Harder to animate but a great idea :) thanks!
Had to rewatch as i missed how you showed how the long side of each rectangle was calculated.
I think showing that as 1 - r - r(1 - r) would be cleared than (1 - r) - r(1 - r)
Or maybe 1 - [r + r(1 - r)]
Do Pi = 4 next, please!!
But this one is true.
@@MathVisualProofs I know, i just couldn't find a Pi = 4 "proof" without words
Except you cheated, the final square in the animation isn't black, you filled it in, there should still be a space left over however infinitesimal it is that is effectively the original square at a much smaller scale leading to a further infinite steps... This is why convergent geometric series need a Limit function to calculate, they never reach the limit, the square is never filled.
Shouldn't ths channel's name be 'Empirial Mathematics Proof'
Nice name but I wouldn't say he copied it. But he rediscovered it
@@justafanoftheguywithamoust5594 Why? Did people not know to find finitesmal rate of change before him in the world? Is it not how Aryabhatta calculated the 24 values of sine(jya) and Madhava calculated 96 values of sine?
@@justafanoftheguywithamoust5594 And if you make the claim that he 'rediscovered' it, please explain why was fluxions abandoned more than a century ago?
(There was nothing like fluxions existing before Newton it's just a fantasy bulls**t)
You just don't want to use mathematics for its practical purposes and just want to keep yourself safe and sound in your own fantasy world!
@@justafanoftheguywithamoust5594 'Doctrine of Christian Discovery'🤣
@@justafanoftheguywithamoust5594 also Dedekind invented Dedekind cuts in 1878
Dedekind cuts and set theory(axiomatic set theory, not the cantorian set theory) is used for definition of real nos.
And real nos. are used for definition of limits.
So how did Newton and Leibniz 'rediscover' calculus without understanding them?