Richard Serra - Talk with Charlie Rose (2001)
Вставка
- Опубліковано 29 вер 2024
- An hour conversation with sculptor Richard Serra (1938-2024) about his exhibition at The Gagosian Gallery in New York City, his use of synthetic materials in art and his career in film (2001).
I like this guy. He thinks and he feels strongly. He stands by his fully realized convictions without compromise, because compromise would be death.
***** That's like saying Serra should have compromised his aesthetic convictions in his art so that he wouldn't seem too extreme and offend anyone. Might as well quit.
One of Charlie Rose's best interviews. It obviously helps when the interviewee is intelligent and articulate.
What a tremendous conversation
my parents never encouraged me. they did not nurture me. they didn't understand the idea of being an artist. most don't. if you are an artist, keep doing it. Nothing will ever be more satisfying.
My mom seem to have some idea of art, but I think she leaned towards realism and less on abstract concepts.
Same here. I'm happy they didn't tho, gave me more freedom.
Removing the Tilted Arc left a scar on the plaza. Still a memory.
For future reference for myself: 40:00, 42:45 - 44:50
Agree
Nice
Amazing! It's always an adventure to look into the mind of an artist. Especially given that Richard Serra makes artwork that might be hard to understand until you see through the lens of the artist.
Richard Serra is my #1 idol. What a talent...!!!
Richard Serra (1938-2024)
I think what he shares and his insights are amazing. I like what he said about sculpture versus architecture, which I agree
these more old fashioned interviews, where the interviewer treats the artist as a peculiarity who has to defend themselves...and the usual question "did you ever think of doing architecture as a profession" (i.e ever thought of a serious job) "no" "theres too many constraints...architects have to think about plumbing.." "plumbing???" (...the interviewer suspends reality as if not to understand....) Yes, you are talking to an Artist mate. Serra holds his own, naturally.
He is so American, so is his art.
What about beauty? Aaamm........
Very proud of himself, maybe little to arrogant
38:30 Did Tim and Eric edit that?
This was a very good interview, if not his best.
His description of 9/11 is harrowing. can't imagine.
Excellent Interview with a Living Legend
Interesting that he gives himself a pass on beauty, I would almost say he's more of a experimenter in the science of perception and experience than an artist.
His work certainly has interesting implications for architecture in terms of environmental psychology.
Wish the guy would speak at a more measured pace
Aspect of Labyrinth abyrinth
Richard Serra perspective is relevant and so is his art...
Displacing from taken away from visually placing in Hierarchical standard
One of our best artists ❤
He changed the language of art in 20 century he translated the Asian art by steel for the West 🙏🙏
Gocametti a favorite wasn't familiar my work in bronze
Cubism similarities
fell in love with his work in bilboa and happy castelli was good to him because he was an ass when i met him..... interesting his background experience to his work becoming what it is.
Rip Richard Serra
His brother is Tony Serra, a brilliant attorney in his own right. Apparently they too dont and havent talked in years.
Fortunate for great mother similar awarded at second grade. My work awarded was plave in the closet to destroy to forever disappearing.
Are you a drunk AI, or a person crying for help?
Wording l used in HS for applications ?
20:00
DEP
Reminds of a work done Hans Hacker first year
I guess you need to be immodest to pull off what he does. He's very good at self-justification, with the arrogance to stay the course (almost as arrogant as Frank Lloyd Wright), but there are many ways to skin a dead cat. Maybe he's become more open-minded with age but I doubt it. This kind of rigidity is a fundamentalist mindset, not a creative one, in the orthodox mold of the so-called High-Modernists. Yet at his best he is definitely a powerful sculptor, or artist, but for my socialist/anarchist lack-of-money, Martin Puryear looks a lot more inventive and deeper these days. But whatever, to make lasting art is the best an artist can hope for. And he's done that.
Pieces of lead? Really?
this is amazing. :)
Its more than unique .
Great!
51
Love his art! Thanks for sharing!!
Hasn't been part of societal, only change
Devoid of capturing
Arch is an
Boring Boredom
Wow, huge fan but can't stand him
Vastly over-rated.
His Tiled Arc thing sucked. But other than that, pretty cool.
I can't imagine the torture of spending 24 hours in person with this guy.
Beauty behind the times... That is why your work is so dry. Those blocks in the MoMa are exactly that. A waste of space. Calder liberated sculpture if a sculpture is about "space".
Good, but way overrated.
BOSS