When I, a KJV Bible Believer, listen to Brother Denlinger I feel like I'm right there with him. He bears his soul to people and his preaching is straight from the word of God-KJV. Thank you Bryan.
Thank you Brother Bryan 🙏 I look forward to your teachings I really mean that your such an interesting smart Pastor 🙏 when you dig you dig deep you bring truth an light into a world full of darkness you and your family and Brethren thank-you so much
Praise the LORD JESUS THE CHRIST that HE opened your eyes, heart, and spirit Blessed Brother Bryan. I'm glad HE changed your life and helped you come to believing in the King James Bible
18:49 Amen That's what I did. When I first started reading the Bible I did it with a rebellious spirit. But God's Spirit spoke to me through His word and I became a believer.
Thank you, Blessed, Beloved Brother Bryan for all the money, time, and research you have done for so many many years. The LORD GOD JESUS THE CHRIST bless you Brother Bryan and your family and the ministry HE gives you to do on the internet and UA-cam. ❤🎉
I never get tired of talking about the King James Bible, defending it, researching the history, pointing people to it and of course reading it and feeling the confidence that God is speaking to me throught it. I praise the Lord that hs kead me to look into the bible version issue in 2015. It lead to my salvation after being a modern,ESV using, apostate church going false convert for 19 years! My seminary trained Uncle has mocked me and the King James Bible ever since I started researching the issue. It makes me sad and angers me that someone could study the issue just as much as I have and end up rejecting the word of God. His life seems to have fallen apart after that. I think because he rejected belief in the KJB, he has been a false convert for 55 years.
I am searching for the perfect bible. The problem is: some say the „oxford KJV“ is the word of God, some say „cambridge KJV“ is the word of God. How should we know which KJV is the right one?
praise the Lord! your unwavering stand on the kjv brought me through Ephesians 4: 14 (kjv) thank you Heavenly Father for your servant, brother bryan! Jesus is coming!
I love this! Been studying the Bible version issue (and the history of the English Bible in general) since 2017, got saved in 2019, and to this day this subject NEVER gets old for me. Can't wait for the upcoming videos on this! Thank you brother Bryan, God bless you for defending his perfect word.
Thank you bryan ❤for all the teaching and knowledge JESUS CHRIST had you show us,step by step, verse by verse 😢thank you and godbless bryan and family may the LORD bless you ❤
Excited to see you share WHY you switched english translations of Gods Word, wish you would have done so in this video but it seems like a summary of the content you’ve researched so far. Looking forward to seeing you give your reasons why in subsequent videos.
The problem with a "perfect book:", is what book was perfect in 1610. That aside, the KJB authors didn't treat the KJB as if it were a perfect book. They said that they did the best prayerful job that they could, and that each reader should use lower criticisim to check it for themselves. They also included marginal notes where in various places they had variations of opinions on translations. Once again, that aside, the KJB I believe is a faithful translation from faithful copies, which I believe we should be looking for. Any translation from an Alexandrian text is not from a faithful copy. I think KJB offers the superior translation, but there are plenty of instances of things that could be better, but you could say are technically right. For instance, in Acts, Jesus leading Israel over the Jordan. Jesus is the Greek translation of Joshua. Perhaps you could argue that Jesus actually did lead them over, but I doubt that is what was trying to be said; that Joshua lead them over. Another big one, is the word baptise. Why did the translators refuse to translate this word? Was it because the Anglicans were practising false methods of baptism. What about John 21, where Jesus asks Peter if he loves Him. Why didn't the translators allow the meaning of the Greek to carry through into the English? What of the contradictions in the genealogies? Now KJB didn't create those errors, but it didn't fix them either. I don't believe KJB is "perfect", but it is extremely good. What of the use of the English name James? Is that a valid translation of Jacob to James, or is it because the King at the time was named James? The translators were exceptional men, and the process which King James set in place was genious. They are above my level of study, and I believe that this translation can be relied on well above other English translations. Perfect, inspired? I prefer to say Faithful. They balanced all the issues, and attempted to honour God with a translation that was faithful to the faithful copies which were handed down. That also means that other translations could be faithful, and so there isn't an issue of there not being a translation available before 1611, which is an issue, if you believe that there must have always been an inspired word available at all times to everyone, which some state.
Read the dedication page to see what the KJV translators believed. They believed there should be one more translation of the holy scriptures into the English tongue. There words not mine.
@@We_project_biblically The dedication in the King James Bible is written by King James. It was a requirement that the dedication be included in every printing of the KJB. It doesn't say that there will be another version. The translators provided a letter to the reader, which is much longer than the dedication. Please provide paragraph and line in which they stated that there must be one more translation, because I am unable to find it.
Psalm 56:9-11 Authorized (King James) Version 9 When I cry unto thee, then shall mine enemies turn back: this I know; for God is for me. 10 In God will I praise his word: in the Lord will I praise his word. 11 In God have I put my trust: I will not be afraid what man can do unto me.
Thanks many don’t care about this issue, they’re happy believing what some man behind a pulpit says, is a better translation. I appreciate all your work and dedication to the truth!
Thanks for all your hard work and dedication. I love to watch your video's on the King James Bible. This is going to be good, the kind of stuff built upon a rock.
Originally, I was Russian orthodox growing up ,then 35 yrs ago changed to born again KJV 1611 only for me 55 yrs old ! I have plenty of bibles the only true one is KJV 1611 authorised ! I don't like any of the new it is all contradictory and made up changed to suit the agenda of the day ! God bless in Jesus name ! Thank you agree %100 ! PS amplified evil stuff !
I was browsing in a used bookstore a few years ago looking in their Bible section, and I found a real jewel. It's a pocket size KJV New Testament. It's a hard backed edition. When I opened it to the title page I was amazed at what I saw. It's says, The New Testament of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, translated out of the original Greek, and with the former translations diligently compared and revised, then it reads, Augusta, Confederate States Bible Society, instituted in the year 1862, printed by Wood, Hanleiter Rice and CO. Atlanta, Ga. 1862. It's in new condition, and I doubt that it was ever on the battlefield, but it's authentic. And I only paid 75 cents for it! I keep it in a zip lock bag to protect it because it's 162 years old. When I pick up my Cambridge Concord KJV that I've had for many years it's always a blessing to realize that this is the Bible that has a connection to every other KJV and has stood the test of time for over 400 years and has been blessed by God, and has been used by men and women of God in so many generations to proclaim the Gospel of Jesus Christ. Thank God for the KJV!
Im sticking with the kjv, I recently heard a testimony from a brother in christ that was freed from prison, He had been sentenced to life in prison and by God's Grace had him clear of his charges and now is preaching th Gospal. The witnesses that shared the Gospel with him used a kjv. I can say if for someone who heard the Gospel from a preaching with kjv, was saved, came out prison, and was invited to a sSate Governers lunch to give a speach, I can say that God uses the kjv and it is trustworthy.
Seeing tears in the wheat makes me so excited! Chantre a long while back, recommended A Lamp in the Dark to me. Right after I had found the bible version issue documentary, and I realized it's YOUR VOICE. A very fun surprise back when I felt like an absolute child in The Lord. 19:53 I actually found out about the KJV and your minstry because of my searching for truth. Would have never if I didnt believe in truth. Really happy God called me. Through His own book at that!! Stay awesome, brother.
@@CC-iu7sq It's a matter of your own personal Faith in God and the sincerity of you seeking God. Pick any scripture about faith and/or seeking God. If you want a worldly explanation then it would be to beware of the scribes and question their authority. Mat_5:20 For I say unto you, That except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven. Mat_23:13 But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in yourselves, neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in.
@@starboard9551 1. Faith In God doesn’t direct you to the KJV. Neither does you seeking God. There is no scripture to support such a claim. 2. Define “Worldly Explanation”. That’s a side rabbit trail. But that verbiage flirts with logical fallacy. I’m curious where you go with that. 3. Neither of those verses in Matthew are relevant to this discussion. Within their contextual meaning, it’s far from it. I’ve answered your explaining. Now, you’ll answer mine. 1. Where was the Bible for 1611 years prior to the KJV? 2. How does God preserve his word? 3. Define the “Word of God” 4. Which revised edition of the KJV do you use? Please note, both the 18th Blayney revised edition and the 19th century Cambridge revised editions both contain textual changes. Not only typography. There are also textual changes with compared to Oxford editions. 5. Which KJV based on which edition of the Textus Receptus is the only edition we should use? Certainly, you know the differences, right? 6. The KJV is an official revision of the Bishops Bible. Please explain to me why this is acceptable in the eyes of God, but modern versions aren’t? 7. We criticize Jehovahs Witnesses and Muslims for requiring single translational use of their religions. Why are Christians exempt of this standard? And final question. 8. Why is King James Onlyism not a cult?
“All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: that the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works.” 2 Timothy 3:16-17
@@RobertDrake-i1u Well if that scripture is fabricated by a scribe then it isn't inspired by God is it. "Perfect" means inspired, someone calling something scripture doesn't automatically make it scripture.
I remember befor I became saved as a teen I heard a friend say, "New King James" and for some reason I was completely repulsed. Then he told me there was other versions and I was more repulsed. I was always KJV only before I knew better or even read any of it.
I am searching for the perfect bible. The problem is: some say the „oxford KJV“ is the word of God, some say „cambridge KJV“ is the word of God. How should we know which KJV is the right one?
I must admit fam that after going through a pile of Bible versions in English language, I was left with no choice but to conclude that KJV is the Bible version I am a going to keep.
It comes down to if God preserved the text of not. People that support the new versions are ready to take out any verse based on new manuscript discoveries
When I was first saved I thought the NIV was a good translation because I didn’t know any better .. I do remember not liking the notes in some bibles that seemed meant to cause doubt in what I was reading. No matter what version I tried I kept being drawn back to the kjv. I sing soprano so Handel’s Messiah made me appreciate the language of the kjv. When I started watching Bryan’s videos it really made me think about Bible versions and the whole idea of going to church. Most Christians try to steer you away from the kjv. Although at first I fell into that trap, but like I said I was always drawn back to the kjv. Now I use exclusively and trust no other version. Thanks Bryan for your ministry!
I look forward to your continued study on this, I believe is a very important topic. My mother is a born again believer. She has developed brain cancer. She knows my stance on the KJV, as is the book I have always believed and stand on. I won't bend. She wanted, as her last memory give her Grandchildren a bible to remember her by. She asked me if I would be upset with her giving then a NKJV. I said; I do not approve. It became an argument with me and her. I was challenged many years ago to prove way I believe KJV IS Gods Word. You were one of the men on the topic. I've not read or studied as much as you, but came to have much disdain for those other perversions. If I share a Bible with my Children and grandchildren it is the KJV only. I believe if God preserved his word then it has to be the KJV for the English speaking people. My wife and I as were studying and reading together using Youversion KJV to use it to read audio with us and our actual bibles as we used the audio to read along together. I have an older 1988 version. My wife has a newer printing that matches her Bible. There have been changes, suttle, but changed. I've heard recently that the Cambridge edition is more true to original printing. I now want a Cambridge edition for my home. Thanks for in these ladt days taking this topic on again.
Have you heard of the Webster Bible (aka Common Bible of 1833)? The same guy who co-created the Merriam-Webster dictionary (Noah Webster) made a light edit of the KJV. For example, he changed 2 Thessalonians 2:7 to "For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now restraineth [will] restrain, until he be taken out of the way." What do you think about this?
Brother, I loved the Boeing jokes!!!!! I have tried to put together a library like yours and I am very happy and pleased that you are able to have been blessed to have all of this material. Occasionally I have a point of difference with your interpretation but I am blessed to have found your channel. Blessing from Joe in Pennsylvania
Never done this but Id like to share a thing God showed me. Jeremiah 17:13 O LORD, the hope of Israel, all that forsake thee shall be ashamed, and they that depart from me shall be written in the earth, because they have forsaken the LORD, *the fountain of living waters*. John 4:13-14 Jesus answered and said unto her, whosoever drinketh of this water shall thirst again. But whosoever drinketh of the water i shall give him shall never thirst, but the water that i shall give him shall be in him a well of water sprining up into everlasting life. John 19:33-34 But when the came to Jesus, and saw that he was dead already, they brake not his legs. But one of the soldiers with a spear pierced his side, and forthwith came there out blood and *water*. Jesus is the fountain of life.
I went to church of England and they used NIV but so did I when I first went then I used new king james then I used King James Bible,I praise Jesus for his pure word KJB.
The question is, did the word of God exist before 1611? If the manuscripts Erasmus used are the word of God, then any accurate English translation of those manuscript must be as well.
I get inspired when I listen to your videos for sure! For anyone out there who wants to see some more 'documentation' as to the Purity, Perfection, Preservation of the KJB absolutely being the only word of God, there are several utube channels that are fabulous. 1. Truth is Christ 2. Above God's Name 3. Chosen Souldier 4. 1611 King James Bible Museum. God bless all who seek to learn more about God and his word!
Thank ya Brother Bryan, for all your research! Something inside of me always thought the KJV was the right Bible, when the Lutheran church changed from old hymnal and to NASB, it all felt off. Praise the Lord, cause my brain would explode having to study all that. I'm not a book guy, even when I worked on cars, had a hard time with service manuals and trouble trees(route to test a circuit), besides engineers written manuals, is a joke. I could find better way to disassemble myself, that is who I am and how my brain's wired. I'm glad you did it and this will be interesting.
Hi Bryan…..I have the 1881 version in my collection…..How amazing is that…😁 EDIT I do not know what I have, I will refer to you when I need for questions…
watching the stuff truth is christ presents should be sufficient evidence that God's fingerprints are all over this book, and that it is not just a simple translation done by uninspired men.
When I found out that in order to be able to make a profit, publishers had to change a percentage of the original version, I went to the original King James version.
@@airiksknifereviews9548 you say it's fake news. Where's your evidence. Why should I accept your word over the other info? Another thing, I came to the truth. That's something I will always be thankful for.
@@reginacarroll8149 Fake news wasn't my words they were yours. UA-cam is full of videos with people who left the kJV only belief. I pushed it for many years and understand the heart of those who believe it. I am not here to pull you away from reading the KJV . Use that bible it's a good translation, but it has many words that have changed meaning. I still use the KJV it's a main reader for me, but I won't pretend that there aren't issues with the language.
Where can we find your writings in defense of the KJB? I purchased your book “The Godhead Doctrine” months back, & I would love to read your work in defense of KJB as well. Lord bless & keep you 🙏✝️
The historical anomolies surrounding the publishing of the KJV (sinking of the Spanish Armada, the gunpowder plot) make it an obvious choice, not to mention the geometrical structure of the highest, most formal language of the English speaking world, which you would expect to use in front of our Lord. Lord bless, brother.
Many years ago after seeing a short video about missing verses I wrote to Charles Stanley about this. The letter I received said the NIV is fine. I believe KJV is the Word of God. I'm looking forward to this series!
After study of ALL the ACTUAL manuscript evidence, over the past 50 years - as well as studying the English language - I totally, and completely REJECT the KJV as a translation to be read be English speakers of today. Get yourself an ACTUAL ENGLISH translation, like the NET, NASB, or ESV.
FOR IT IS WRITTEN,………….STUDY TO SHEW THYSELF APPROVED UNTO GOD , A WORKMAN THAT NEEDETH NOT TO BE ASHAMED , RIGHTLY DIVIDING THE WORD OF OF TRUTH . 2 TIMOTHY 2 : 15 KJV
Can you make available the bible reading plan that was on your website? Or can you do a video about it or where I may be able to obtain one? That was the best plan. I lost mine when I had to leave my home. Appreciate that! Thank you.
I hope there is going to be a comparison between the 1560 and the 1599 Geneva versions, as I believe the study notes included in the latter are fascinating in particular in their refuting the antichrist pope and RC church.
I wish this video had more content to it. It was really just a list of resources. I only read and study the KJV, to the exclusion of all other translations, but I certainly don't believe that the KJV is "God's perfect word in the English language". For that statement to be true, God would need to have a "perfect" translation of His word in every language that ever existed. Why? Because God is not a respecter of persons (Acts 10:34 and Romans 2:11). If God has a "perfect" word in any number of languages that is less than all languages to ever exist, then He would be favoring the people of those languages. Instead, God revealed His word to individuals who shared that word with the world in whatever languages they knew. This illustrates the idea that God is more concerned with the *concepts* He communicated rather than the translation. That said, I do believe the KJV to be the most accurate English bible - but it is not without issue.
@@BryanDenlingerKJVM No bible, not even the bad translations, list a perfect written word as a prerequisite for salvation. We are saved by grace through faith, or by calling on His name.
@@davidyoder5890 James 1:21 Wherefore lay apart all filthiness and superfluity of naughtiness, and receive with meekness the engrafted word, which is able to save your souls. James 1:22 But be ye doers of the word, and not hearers only, deceiving your own selves.
@@BryanDenlingerKJVM In verse 21, the word rendered "engrafted" is Strong's G1721 and the definition of that word is: inborn, implanted by nature, implanted by others instruction. No part of either of those verses indicates that a perfect written word is required for salvation. By that standard, how was anyone saved before the KJV? How was the thief on the cross saved? How were any of the apostles saved if they didn't have a complete perfect written word? If you're arguing that a perfect written word is required for salvation, I'd love to see some justification for that. None of this, though, is cause for breaking fellowship.
Imaginations does have self adventures called journeys to ink and paper tales only study with asleep Adam's till woke them mind reads silence about your self I AM so gods do try with outside shadows till is studying itself so Eternal need better more excellent ways.
Any _standard_ edition of the Authorized King James Bible is fine, as the KJB is God's perfect and infallible word without error. However, some editions have typographical (presentational) errors that were never corrected (such as the Oxford editions of the King James Bible, which are now reprinted by _R. L. Allan_ in the UK). This does not mean that such editions of the KJB are therefore imperfect or are not God's infallible word, because such "errors" are only presentational (see 1 Sam. 16:7), not intentional corruptions. Also, the typographical errors in the Oxford editions just so happen to not affect doctrine at all. But as for the edition of the King James Bible that has had all typographical errors ironed out, I personally believe it is what is known as the "Pure Cambridge Edition" of 1900, which is reprinted by various publishers, such as _Local Church Bible Publishers_ and _Church Bible Publishers,_ whom I highly recommend. But really and truly, any Cambridge edition of the King James Bible is perfectly fine, and is better _presentationally_ than an Oxford edition. But either way, you can read an original 1611 edition with all of its typos and presentational errors (I personally do every day) and gain just as much from it spiritually as you would reading a Pure Cambridge Edition, _because it is only a matter of accidental, typographical errors._ All standard editions of the KJB are still God's perfect word no matter what. I would for sure avoid any King James Bibles published by Zondervan though.
Not sure which 2011 KJV you mean. Check the publisher. Cambridge and Church Bible Publishers are the best, but Holman makes some cheap ones that work great. I would trust Holman publishers over Thomas Nelson any day because some Thomas Nelson Bibles changed names/words/spelling in their KJV. Never go near Zondervan.
@@ChantreJ No, no, no usually, not always most kj only people are pretriblation rapture and osas and they are adamant that all other translations are inferior. So for me if some is kj only and believe the above I do not care. I like the NET bible. The question is are we living and obeying JESUS. JESUS doesn't care if I read the kj bible or the net bible.
@@wildrover9650 The NET? Seriously? The NET follows the perverted Alexandrian Greek of Westcott and Hort. No wonder it's called "net." It's a trap. It's like the NIV. The vital word "Godhead" appears 3 places in the King James Bible, and is completely removed from the NET (compare Romans 1:20; Acts 17:29; Colossians 2:9). In Isaiah 7:14, the King James Bible records the Messianic prophecy that "a virgin" would conceive and bring forth a child, i.e., the Son of God. The NET diminishes the phrase "a virgin" to "this young woman." The NET corrupts 1 Timothy 3:16 concerning the manifestation of the Godhead in the flesh of Jesus Christ... "He was revealed in the flesh..." In sharp contrast, once again, the trustworthy King James Bible states... "God was manifest in the flesh..." - 1 Timothy 3:16 As with the Godless NIV, the NET completely REMOVES the vital word "begotten" from John 3:16. 1st John 3:1-2 says, "Behold, what manner of love the Father hath bestowed upon us, that we should be called the sons of God: therefore the world knoweth us not, because it knew him not. Beloved, now are we the sons of God..." Every believer is an adopted child of God; but Jesus is the ONLY BEGOTTEN Son of God. To say that Jesus is God's "one and only Son" is a lie. Furthermore, the word "begotten" clearly identifies Jesus as being God in the flesh. The NET also wickedly perverts Philippians 2:6 concerning Jesus Christ. I could go on, but "who cares"? Clearly you don't, so have fun in your Satanic net because it also removed the word study in 2 Timothy 2:15. Wouldn't want to do that because who cares.
When I, a KJV Bible Believer, listen to Brother Denlinger I feel like I'm right there with him. He bears his soul to people and his preaching is straight from the word of God-KJV. Thank you Bryan.
Thank you Brother Bryan 🙏 I look forward to your teachings I really mean that your such an interesting smart Pastor 🙏 when you dig you dig deep you bring truth an light into a world full of darkness you and your family and Brethren thank-you so much
Amen! I’m 21 years old and I absolutely agree. I love the KJB.
Amen brother!
Amen
Praise the LORD JESUS THE CHRIST that HE opened your eyes, heart, and spirit Blessed Brother Bryan. I'm glad HE changed your life and helped you come to believing in the King James Bible
18:49
Amen
That's what I did.
When I first started reading the Bible I did it with a rebellious spirit.
But God's Spirit spoke to me through His word and I became a believer.
Praise the Lord!
Thank you, Blessed, Beloved Brother Bryan for all the money, time, and research you have done for so many many years. The LORD GOD JESUS THE CHRIST bless you Brother Bryan and your family and the ministry HE gives you to do on the internet and UA-cam. ❤🎉
Godspeed brother. Thank you for your work and faithfulness to God’s pure word.
I never get tired of talking about the King James Bible, defending it, researching the history, pointing people to it and of course reading it and feeling the confidence that God is speaking to me throught it. I praise the Lord that hs kead me to look into the bible version issue in 2015. It lead to my salvation after being a modern,ESV using, apostate church going false convert for 19 years!
My seminary trained Uncle has mocked me and the King James Bible ever since I started researching the issue. It makes me sad and angers me that someone could study the issue just as much as I have and end up rejecting the word of God. His life seems to have fallen apart after that. I think because he rejected belief in the KJB, he has been a false convert for 55 years.
I am searching for the perfect bible. The problem is: some say the „oxford KJV“ is the word of God, some say „cambridge KJV“ is the word of God. How should we know which KJV is the right one?
learning about the King James Version was perhaps the single most significant event in my Christian walk
praise the Lord! your unwavering stand on the kjv brought me through Ephesians 4: 14 (kjv) thank you Heavenly Father for your servant, brother bryan! Jesus is coming!
I love this! Been studying the Bible version issue (and the history of the English Bible in general) since 2017, got saved in 2019, and to this day this subject NEVER gets old for me. Can't wait for the upcoming videos on this! Thank you brother Bryan, God bless you for defending his perfect word.
Me too brother. This subject is what led me to the Lord Jesus Christ.
Thank you bryan ❤for all the teaching and knowledge JESUS CHRIST had you show us,step by step, verse by verse 😢thank you and godbless bryan and family may the LORD bless you ❤
Thank you brother Bryan for all your devotion
Excited to see you share WHY you switched english translations of Gods Word, wish you would have done so in this video but it seems like a summary of the content you’ve researched so far.
Looking forward to seeing you give your reasons why in subsequent videos.
1972 I began studying the KJ V until now. I also have several decent books and facsimiles! God bless you, your family, and your efforts. Amen!!!
The problem with a "perfect book:", is what book was perfect in 1610. That aside, the KJB authors didn't treat the KJB as if it were a perfect book. They said that they did the best prayerful job that they could, and that each reader should use lower criticisim to check it for themselves. They also included marginal notes where in various places they had variations of opinions on translations. Once again, that aside, the KJB I believe is a faithful translation from faithful copies, which I believe we should be looking for. Any translation from an Alexandrian text is not from a faithful copy. I think KJB offers the superior translation, but there are plenty of instances of things that could be better, but you could say are technically right.
For instance, in Acts, Jesus leading Israel over the Jordan. Jesus is the Greek translation of Joshua. Perhaps you could argue that Jesus actually did lead them over, but I doubt that is what was trying to be said; that Joshua lead them over. Another big one, is the word baptise. Why did the translators refuse to translate this word? Was it because the Anglicans were practising false methods of baptism. What about John 21, where Jesus asks Peter if he loves Him. Why didn't the translators allow the meaning of the Greek to carry through into the English? What of the contradictions in the genealogies? Now KJB didn't create those errors, but it didn't fix them either. I don't believe KJB is "perfect", but it is extremely good. What of the use of the English name James? Is that a valid translation of Jacob to James, or is it because the King at the time was named James?
The translators were exceptional men, and the process which King James set in place was genious. They are above my level of study, and I believe that this translation can be relied on well above other English translations. Perfect, inspired? I prefer to say Faithful. They balanced all the issues, and attempted to honour God with a translation that was faithful to the faithful copies which were handed down. That also means that other translations could be faithful, and so there isn't an issue of there not being a translation available before 1611, which is an issue, if you believe that there must have always been an inspired word available at all times to everyone, which some state.
Read the dedication page to see what the KJV translators believed. They believed there should be one more translation of the holy scriptures into the English tongue. There words not mine.
@@We_project_biblically The dedication in the King James Bible is written by King James. It was a requirement that the dedication be included in every printing of the KJB. It doesn't say that there will be another version. The translators provided a letter to the reader, which is much longer than the dedication. Please provide paragraph and line in which they stated that there must be one more translation, because I am unable to find it.
Psalm 56:9-11
Authorized (King James) Version
9 When I cry unto thee, then shall mine enemies turn back: this I know; for God is for me.
10 In God will I praise his word: in the Lord will I praise his word.
11 In God have I put my trust: I will not be afraid what man can do unto me.
Thanks many don’t care about this issue, they’re happy believing what some man behind a pulpit says, is a better translation. I appreciate all your work and dedication to the truth!
Thanks for all your hard work and dedication. I love to watch your video's on the King James Bible. This is going to be good, the kind of stuff built upon a rock.
Originally, I was Russian orthodox growing up ,then 35 yrs ago changed to born again KJV 1611 only for me 55 yrs old ! I have plenty of bibles the only true one is KJV 1611 authorised ! I don't like any of the new it is all contradictory and made up changed to suit the agenda of the day ! God bless in Jesus name ! Thank you agree %100 ! PS amplified evil stuff !
I was browsing in a used bookstore a few years ago looking in their Bible section, and I found a real jewel. It's a pocket size KJV New Testament. It's a hard backed edition. When I opened it to the title page I was amazed at what I saw. It's says, The New Testament of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, translated out of the original Greek, and with the former translations diligently compared and revised, then it reads, Augusta, Confederate States Bible Society, instituted in the year 1862, printed by Wood, Hanleiter Rice and CO. Atlanta, Ga. 1862. It's in new condition, and I doubt that it was ever on the battlefield, but it's authentic. And I only paid 75 cents for it! I keep it in a zip lock bag to protect it because it's 162 years old. When I pick up my Cambridge Concord KJV that I've had for many years it's always a blessing to realize that this is the Bible that has a connection to every other KJV and has stood the test of time for over 400 years and has been blessed by God, and has been used by men and women of God in so many generations to proclaim the Gospel of Jesus Christ. Thank God for the KJV!
Im sticking with the kjv, I recently heard a testimony from a brother in christ that was freed from prison, He had been sentenced to life in prison and by God's Grace had him clear of his charges and now is preaching th Gospal. The witnesses that shared the Gospel with him used a kjv. I can say if for someone who heard the Gospel from a preaching with kjv, was saved, came out prison, and was invited to a sSate Governers lunch to give a speach, I can say that God uses the kjv and it is trustworthy.
1611 is most concise bible! I could tell your knowledgeable. Damn I wanna sit with you brother!!!
Seeing tears in the wheat makes me so excited! Chantre a long while back, recommended A Lamp in the Dark to me. Right after I had found the bible version issue documentary, and I realized it's YOUR VOICE. A very fun surprise back when I felt like an absolute child in The Lord.
19:53
I actually found out about the KJV and your minstry because of my searching for truth. Would have never if I didnt believe in truth.
Really happy God called me. Through His own book at that!!
Stay awesome, brother.
If you don't think a perfect Bible exists then you don't believe in a perfect God.
Interesting.
Where does the Bible say that?
@@CC-iu7sq It's a matter of your own personal Faith in God and the sincerity of you seeking God. Pick any scripture about faith and/or seeking God.
If you want a worldly explanation then it would be to beware of the scribes and question their authority.
Mat_5:20 For I say unto you, That except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven.
Mat_23:13 But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in yourselves, neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in.
@@starboard9551 1. Faith In God doesn’t direct you to the KJV. Neither does you seeking God. There is no scripture to support such a claim.
2. Define “Worldly Explanation”. That’s a side rabbit trail. But that verbiage flirts with logical fallacy. I’m curious where you go with that.
3. Neither of those verses in Matthew are relevant to this discussion. Within their contextual meaning, it’s far from it.
I’ve answered your explaining. Now, you’ll answer mine.
1. Where was the Bible for 1611 years prior to the KJV?
2. How does God preserve his word?
3. Define the “Word of God”
4. Which revised edition of the KJV do you use? Please note, both the 18th Blayney revised edition and the 19th century Cambridge revised editions both contain textual changes. Not only typography. There are also textual changes with compared to Oxford editions.
5. Which KJV based on which edition of the Textus Receptus is the only edition we should use? Certainly, you know the differences, right?
6. The KJV is an official revision of the Bishops Bible. Please explain to me why this is acceptable in the eyes of God, but modern versions aren’t?
7. We criticize Jehovahs Witnesses and Muslims for requiring single translational use of their religions. Why are Christians exempt of this standard?
And final question.
8.
Why is King James Onlyism not a cult?
“All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: that the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works.”
2 Timothy 3:16-17
@@RobertDrake-i1u Well if that scripture is fabricated by a scribe then it isn't inspired by God is it. "Perfect" means inspired, someone calling something scripture doesn't automatically make it scripture.
Thank you, brother!
Praise the Lord!
I admire your collection your knowledge and wisdom on the subject. I can see the holy spirit is working through you to preserve his accurate holy word
Quel magnifique travail mon frère bravo , je suis impatient pour les prochaines vidéos que DIEU te bénisse mon frère,merci
I remember befor I became saved as a teen I heard a friend say, "New King James" and for some reason I was completely repulsed. Then he told me there was other versions and I was more repulsed. I was always KJV only before I knew better or even read any of it.
There can no more be multiple bibles than there can be multiple gods. 1611 KJB = 100%.
You are a true brother me too ! ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤💯💯💯💯💯💯
Geneva Bible: h-hello?
@@YoungAstronomicalReaserc-zf8zywhere can I get one of those?
I am searching for the perfect bible. The problem is: some say the „oxford KJV“ is the word of God, some say „cambridge KJV“ is the word of God. How should we know which KJV is the right one?
I must admit fam that after going through a pile of Bible versions in English language, I was left with no choice but to conclude that KJV is the Bible version I am a going to keep.
It comes down to if God preserved the text of not. People that support the new versions are ready to take out any verse based on new manuscript discoveries
When I was first saved I thought the NIV was a good translation because I didn’t know any better .. I do remember not liking the notes in some bibles that seemed meant to cause doubt in what I was reading. No matter what version I tried I kept being drawn back to the kjv. I sing soprano so Handel’s Messiah made me appreciate the language of the kjv. When I started watching Bryan’s videos it really made me think about Bible versions and the whole idea of going to church. Most Christians try to steer you away from the kjv. Although at first I fell into that trap, but like I said I was always drawn back to the kjv. Now I use exclusively and trust no other version. Thanks Bryan for your ministry!
I look forward to your continued study on this, I believe is a very important topic.
My mother is a born again believer. She has developed brain cancer. She knows my stance on the KJV, as is the book I have always believed and stand on. I won't bend.
She wanted, as her last memory give her Grandchildren a bible to remember her by. She asked me if I would be upset with her giving then a NKJV. I said; I do not approve. It became an argument with me and her.
I was challenged many years ago to prove way I believe KJV IS Gods Word. You were one of the men on the topic. I've not read or studied as much as you, but came to have much disdain for those other perversions.
If I share a Bible with my Children and grandchildren it is the KJV only.
I believe if God preserved his word then it has to be the KJV for the English speaking people.
My wife and I as were studying and reading together using Youversion KJV to use it to read audio with us and our actual bibles as we used the audio to read along together. I have an older 1988 version. My wife has a newer printing that matches her Bible. There have been changes, suttle, but changed. I've heard recently that the Cambridge edition is more true to original printing.
I now want a Cambridge edition for my home.
Thanks for in these ladt days taking this topic on again.
Amen!!!! KJV ONLY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
GREAT LIBRARY!!!
I was jealous, until I remembered that you have to take care of all those books...
IMHO
Have you heard of the Webster Bible (aka Common Bible of 1833)? The same guy who co-created the Merriam-Webster dictionary (Noah Webster) made a light edit of the KJV. For example, he changed 2 Thessalonians 2:7 to "For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now restraineth [will] restrain, until he be taken out of the way." What do you think about this?
Brother,
I loved the Boeing jokes!!!!!
I have tried to put together a library like yours and I am very happy and pleased that you are able to have been blessed to have all of this material.
Occasionally I have a point of difference with your interpretation but I am blessed to have found your channel.
Blessing from Joe in Pennsylvania
Never done this but Id like to share a thing God showed me.
Jeremiah 17:13 O LORD, the hope of Israel, all that forsake thee shall be ashamed, and they that depart from me shall be written in the earth, because they have forsaken the LORD, *the fountain of living waters*.
John 4:13-14 Jesus answered and said unto her, whosoever drinketh of this water shall thirst again.
But whosoever drinketh of the water i shall give him shall never thirst, but the water that i shall give him shall be in him a well of water sprining up into everlasting life.
John 19:33-34 But when the came to Jesus, and saw that he was dead already, they brake not his legs.
But one of the soldiers with a spear pierced his side, and forthwith came there out blood and *water*.
Jesus is the fountain of life.
I went to church of England and they used NIV but so did I when I first went then I used new king james then I used King James Bible,I praise Jesus for his pure word KJB.
Not versions, counterfeits!
Brother Bryan at the judgement seat of Christ,that'll be a glorious moment
And a perfect book for spanish speakers es la Valera de 1602 purificada!
I love my KJV I though away the NI V a old acwantence gave me a few days ago .
The question is, did the word of God exist before 1611? If the manuscripts Erasmus used are the word of God, then any accurate English translation of those manuscript must be as well.
Catholics from la Trinidad church in Chile use the Spanish NVI. Exactly the same spirit and speech of NTV's new churches attendants.
Do you have Webster Bible and Tree of Life version?
I get inspired when I listen to your videos for sure! For anyone out there who wants to see some more 'documentation' as to the Purity, Perfection, Preservation of the KJB absolutely being the only word of God, there are several utube channels that are fabulous. 1. Truth is Christ 2. Above God's Name 3. Chosen Souldier 4. 1611 King James Bible Museum. God bless all who seek to learn more about God and his word!
Thank ya Brother Bryan, for all your research! Something inside of me always thought the KJV was the right Bible, when the Lutheran church changed from old hymnal and to NASB, it all felt off. Praise the Lord, cause my brain would explode having to study all that. I'm not a book guy, even when I worked on cars, had a hard time with service manuals and trouble trees(route to test a circuit), besides engineers written manuals, is a joke. I could find better way to disassemble myself, that is who I am and how my brain's wired. I'm glad you did it and this will be interesting.
Which KJV version do you recommend? Cambridge edition?
Hi Bryan…..I have the 1881 version in my collection…..How amazing is that…😁
EDIT
I do not know what I have, I will refer to you when I need for questions…
watching the stuff truth is christ presents should be sufficient evidence that God's fingerprints are all over this book, and that it is not just a simple translation done by uninspired men.
When I found out that in order to be able to make a profit, publishers had to change a percentage of the original version, I went to the original King James version.
@@Kingdom-_- then I thank God for fake news, because that certainly brought me to the KJV.
@reginacarroll8149 You "thank God" for a blatant lie? That's a perfect example of itching ears.
@@airiksknifereviews9548 you say it's fake news. Where's your evidence. Why should I accept your word over the other info? Another thing, I came to the truth. That's something I will always be thankful for.
@@reginacarroll8149 Fake news wasn't my words they were yours.
UA-cam is full of videos with people who left the kJV only belief. I pushed it for many years and understand the heart of those who believe it.
I am not here to pull you away from reading the KJV . Use that bible it's a good translation, but it has many words that have changed meaning. I still use the KJV it's a main reader for me, but I won't pretend that there aren't issues with the language.
Geneva Bible is underrated
Where can we find your writings in defense of the KJB?
I purchased your book “The Godhead Doctrine” months back, & I would love to read your work in defense of KJB as well.
Lord bless & keep you 🙏✝️
The historical anomolies surrounding the publishing of the KJV (sinking of the Spanish Armada, the gunpowder plot) make it an obvious choice, not to mention the geometrical structure of the highest, most formal language of the English speaking world, which you would expect to use in front of our Lord. Lord bless, brother.
It has 11.102 verses. Others don't
Many years ago after seeing a short video about missing verses I wrote to Charles Stanley about this. The letter I received said the NIV is fine. I believe KJV is the Word of God. I'm looking forward to this series!
After study of ALL the ACTUAL manuscript evidence, over the past 50 years - as well as studying the English language - I totally, and completely REJECT the KJV as a translation to be read be English speakers of today. Get yourself an ACTUAL ENGLISH translation, like the NET, NASB, or ESV.
FOR IT IS WRITTEN,………….STUDY TO SHEW THYSELF APPROVED UNTO GOD , A WORKMAN THAT NEEDETH NOT TO BE ASHAMED , RIGHTLY DIVIDING THE WORD OF OF TRUTH . 2 TIMOTHY 2 : 15 KJV
Can you make available the bible reading plan that was on your website? Or can you do a video about it or where I may be able to obtain one?
That was the best plan.
I lost mine when I had to leave my home. Appreciate that!
Thank you.
I still have it saved from the old website. If you email me (address on my channel page), I'll send the reading plan file to you.
I hope there is going to be a comparison between the 1560 and the 1599 Geneva versions, as I believe the study notes included in the latter are fascinating in particular in their refuting the antichrist pope and RC church.
The new bible versions have 145 verses missing and they’re watered down.
Good.
I expected some London polyglot, hexapla, or some more obscure readings such as Keatings Irish history or Corys" ancient fragments. 😂
Tldr kjv is top bible
I think you need a new desk.
I wish this video had more content to it. It was really just a list of resources. I only read and study the KJV, to the exclusion of all other translations, but I certainly don't believe that the KJV is "God's perfect word in the English language". For that statement to be true, God would need to have a "perfect" translation of His word in every language that ever existed. Why? Because God is not a respecter of persons (Acts 10:34 and Romans 2:11). If God has a "perfect" word in any number of languages that is less than all languages to ever exist, then He would be favoring the people of those languages. Instead, God revealed His word to individuals who shared that word with the world in whatever languages they knew. This illustrates the idea that God is more concerned with the *concepts* He communicated rather than the translation. That said, I do believe the KJV to be the most accurate English bible - but it is not without issue.
Then how can you claim to be saved if you have no perfect written standard?
@@BryanDenlingerKJVM No bible, not even the bad translations, list a perfect written word as a prerequisite for salvation. We are saved by grace through faith, or by calling on His name.
@@davidyoder5890 James 1:21 Wherefore lay apart all filthiness and superfluity of naughtiness, and receive with meekness the engrafted word, which is able to save your souls.
James 1:22 But be ye doers of the word, and not hearers only, deceiving your own selves.
@@BryanDenlingerKJVM In verse 21, the word rendered "engrafted" is Strong's G1721 and the definition of that word is: inborn, implanted by nature, implanted by others instruction. No part of either of those verses indicates that a perfect written word is required for salvation. By that standard, how was anyone saved before the KJV? How was the thief on the cross saved? How were any of the apostles saved if they didn't have a complete perfect written word? If you're arguing that a perfect written word is required for salvation, I'd love to see some justification for that. None of this, though, is cause for breaking fellowship.
If it was truly the word of God , wouldn't you have one , and only one translation ??
Imaginations does have self adventures called journeys to ink and paper tales only study with asleep Adam's till woke them mind reads silence about your self I AM so gods do try with outside shadows till is studying itself so Eternal need better more excellent ways.
no septuagint or ethiopian
is the 2011 KJV leather back bible good? As in is it a good bible.
Any _standard_ edition of the Authorized King James Bible is fine, as the KJB is God's perfect and infallible word without error. However, some editions have typographical (presentational) errors that were never corrected (such as the Oxford editions of the King James Bible, which are now reprinted by _R. L. Allan_ in the UK). This does not mean that such editions of the KJB are therefore imperfect or are not God's infallible word, because such "errors" are only presentational (see 1 Sam. 16:7), not intentional corruptions. Also, the typographical errors in the Oxford editions just so happen to not affect doctrine at all.
But as for the edition of the King James Bible that has had all typographical errors ironed out, I personally believe it is what is known as the "Pure Cambridge Edition" of 1900, which is reprinted by various publishers, such as _Local Church Bible Publishers_ and _Church Bible Publishers,_ whom I highly recommend. But really and truly, any Cambridge edition of the King James Bible is perfectly fine, and is better _presentationally_ than an Oxford edition.
But either way, you can read an original 1611 edition with all of its typos and presentational errors (I personally do every day) and gain just as much from it spiritually as you would reading a Pure Cambridge Edition, _because it is only a matter of accidental, typographical errors._ All standard editions of the KJB are still God's perfect word no matter what.
I would for sure avoid any King James Bibles published by Zondervan though.
Not sure which 2011 KJV you mean. Check the publisher. Cambridge and Church Bible Publishers are the best, but Holman makes some cheap ones that work great. I would trust Holman publishers over Thomas Nelson any day because some Thomas Nelson Bibles changed names/words/spelling in their KJV. Never go near Zondervan.
@@ChantreJ Collins
@@Totikfr Yes, Collins is another good one for KJV. I have a few old ones.
Why is it better than Geneva Bible?
“How I went from new version loser to KJV user”.
The genealogies aren't correct in the ot due to textual basis. Anyways... Kjv only I guess
@5:12 Boo! and Pfui! on Hort and Wescott
This video was a complete waste of time!
KJV perverts Jude 5.
Who cares.
1 Corinthians 1:18
For the preaching of the cross is to them that perish foolishness; but unto us which are saved it is the power of God.
@@ChantreJ
We aint talking about the preaching of the cross.
@@wildrover9650 It's in the word of God, so yes we are.
@@ChantreJ
No, no, no usually, not always most kj only people are pretriblation rapture and osas and they are adamant that all other translations are inferior. So for me if some is kj only and believe the above I do not care. I like the NET bible. The question is are we living and obeying JESUS. JESUS doesn't care if I read the kj bible or the net bible.
@@wildrover9650 The NET? Seriously? The NET follows the perverted Alexandrian Greek of Westcott and Hort. No wonder it's called "net." It's a trap. It's like the NIV.
The vital word "Godhead" appears 3 places in the King James Bible, and is completely removed from the NET (compare Romans 1:20; Acts 17:29; Colossians 2:9).
In Isaiah 7:14, the King James Bible records the Messianic prophecy that "a virgin" would conceive and bring forth a child, i.e., the Son of God. The NET diminishes the phrase "a virgin" to "this young woman."
The NET corrupts 1 Timothy 3:16 concerning the manifestation of the Godhead in the flesh of Jesus Christ...
"He was revealed in the flesh..."
In sharp contrast, once again, the trustworthy King James Bible states...
"God was manifest in the flesh..." - 1 Timothy 3:16
As with the Godless NIV, the NET completely REMOVES the vital word "begotten" from John 3:16. 1st John 3:1-2 says, "Behold, what manner of love the Father hath bestowed upon us, that we should be called the sons of God: therefore the world knoweth us not, because it knew him not. Beloved, now are we the sons of God..."
Every believer is an adopted child of God; but Jesus is the ONLY BEGOTTEN Son of God. To say that Jesus is God's "one and only Son" is a lie.
Furthermore, the word "begotten" clearly identifies Jesus as being God in the flesh. The NET also wickedly perverts Philippians 2:6 concerning Jesus Christ.
I could go on, but "who cares"? Clearly you don't, so have fun in your Satanic net because it also removed the word study in 2 Timothy 2:15. Wouldn't want to do that because who cares.