If you want to learn a musical tune you can’t just learn the notes. You have to learn the spaces in-between the notes too. Without the spaces there would just be a continual tone and could be no music. Both the notes and the spaces between them are equally important and go to make up the whole. Scientists gazing out at infinite space only look at the planets and stars - all of which can only be defined by the space around them. Without the space there would be no planets or stars. We make the same mistake here on earth. We ignore the space - yet without it nothing can be defined. A cup on a table is defined by what surrounds it that is NOT the cup. The reality is that there is only The Absolute, which includes the space and that which appears to be not space. It is all one appearing as many. So to be The Absolute/The Whole/The Totality you must include in your sense of being the space around you! Try it!
Hi Jamesh, There is only a me in the story, and there is sometimes talking in the story. You can also say 'me' has intention, there is no meaning in anything, intension is not real,(nothing is real), but in the story it seems real.
@@jamehs33 Regarding to the radical non duality speakers, me is the illusory experiencer of things, it seems to be there, but it’s not. For example, you think you are hearing a sound, but in reality there is only the sound, nobody is hearing it. Me is the awareness, the consciousness, the knower. When the illusory sense of me ends, than it’s clear that it was always just sound, sensation, appearance, thoughts etc. , without anybody experiencing those things. Saying that me seems to have intention is quite confusing, but lots of speakers use this kind of wording. I would explain it like this: When the illusion of me is there, then there are intentional thoughts happening, like I want to do this or that. The me newer does anything, it’s just the illusory experiencer.
🙏❤️💎
When there is someone there hearing this message it is just devastating. No family, nothing. Seems completely empty with no fullness 😢
thumbs up.
( button wont work)
If you want to learn a musical tune you can’t just learn the notes. You have to learn the spaces in-between the notes too. Without the spaces there would just be a continual tone and could be no music. Both the notes and the spaces between them are equally important and go to make up the whole.
Scientists gazing out at infinite space only look at the planets and stars - all of which can only be defined by the space around them. Without the space there would be no planets or stars. We make the same mistake here on earth. We ignore the space - yet without it nothing can be defined. A cup on a table is defined by what surrounds it that is NOT the cup.
The reality is that there is only The Absolute, which includes the space and that which appears to be not space. It is all one appearing as many. So to be The Absolute/The Whole/The Totality you must include in your sense of being the space around you!
Try it!
So there is no intention here however it seems like the me has intention to survive by making stories etc??
Hi Jamehs, No in this meeting there is no intension, but 'me' seems to have intension, trying to feel good and to survive...
@@rosemarijnroesThank you for your reply. I always struggle with how can there be a me when there is no me, what is the "seems"?
Hi Jamesh, There is only a me in the story, and there is sometimes talking in the story. You can also say 'me' has intention, there is no meaning in anything, intension is not real,(nothing is real), but in the story it seems real.
@@jamehs33 Regarding to the radical non duality speakers, me is the illusory experiencer of things, it seems to be there, but it’s not. For example, you think you are hearing a sound, but in reality there is only the sound, nobody is hearing it. Me is the awareness, the consciousness, the knower. When the illusory sense of me ends, than it’s clear that it was always just sound, sensation, appearance, thoughts etc. , without anybody experiencing those things. Saying that me seems to have intention is quite confusing, but lots of speakers use this kind of wording.
I would explain it like this:
When the illusion of me is there, then there are intentional thoughts happening, like I want to do this or that. The me newer does anything, it’s just the illusory experiencer.