How Many Universes Exist? | Episode 203 | Closer To Truth

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 8 тра 2024
  • More than one universe? A ridiculous question no more! How could multiple universes be generated, and can we ever find evidence, one way or another? Talk about expanding your horizons: you can't imagine what's in store! Featuring interviews with Andrei Linde, Alan Guth, Martin Rees, Leonard Susskind, Max Tegmark, and Steven Weinberg.
    Season 2, Episode 3 - #CloserToTruth
    ▶Register for free at CTT.com for subscriber-only exclusives: bit.ly/2GXmFsP
    Closer To Truth host Robert Lawrence Kuhn takes viewers on an intriguing global journey into cutting-edge labs, magnificent libraries, hidden gardens, and revered sanctuaries in order to discover state-of-the-art ideas and make them real and relevant.
    ▶Free access to Closer to Truth's library of 5,000 videos: bit.ly/376lkKN
    Closer to Truth presents the world’s greatest thinkers exploring humanity’s deepest questions. Discover fundamental issues of existence. Engage new and diverse ways of thinking. Appreciate intense debates. Share your own opinions. Seek your own answers.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 370

  • @whitefiddle
    @whitefiddle Рік тому +2

    I love that introduction. I honestly think I'm happiest when Kuhn sounds like a fundamentalist Sunday school teacher. 😇

  • @TomTimeTraveler
    @TomTimeTraveler 2 роки тому +12

    Alan Guth is a national treasure. I often wonder how he perceives day-to-day life on Earth when compared to his cosmic perspective.

    • @skwalka6372
      @skwalka6372 Рік тому

      You can be sure Alan Guth didn't vote for Drumpf the clown.

    • @James-ll3jb
      @James-ll3jb 5 місяців тому

      Hitting bongs probably.😅

  • @dnavas7719
    @dnavas7719 3 роки тому +22

    19:24 " the more shocking question is why is it that we never see things being in 2 places at once - at least when we're sober -"
    😂😂😂

  • @akumar7366
    @akumar7366 3 роки тому +78

    It is a joy and pleasure to listen to such brilliant minds ,thank you.

    • @ufotv-viral
      @ufotv-viral 3 роки тому

      👽👍

    • @einfacherkerl3279
      @einfacherkerl3279 3 роки тому +5

      They all are willing to believe something that seems like a fairy tale but not willing to believe that universe is fine tuned and hence there is some force or God for which there are many proofs. How far they have gone and will go to disprove God

    • @akumar7366
      @akumar7366 3 роки тому +2

      @@einfacherkerl3279 I do not accept the majority of scientists main focus in life is to disprove the existence of God .
      Religion expects us to accept the impossible without any proof ,whilst sceince provides evidence for the theory presented, in this particular discussion, it a at this point only an idea, which is both interesting and challenging conventional thought.
      But without imagination and thought we would not move forward.

    • @einfacherkerl3279
      @einfacherkerl3279 3 роки тому +2

      @@akumar7366 to believe in multiverse, that can never be proven requires same leap of faith as God hypothesis. Jus tthat the believers in fine tuning admit intellectually it's got to do with faith while the others simply don't admit.

    • @akumar7366
      @akumar7366 3 роки тому +2

      For me it's just about enjoying listening to these smilulating discussions, that's enough for me .

  • @harmlesspotato2973
    @harmlesspotato2973 3 роки тому +26

    The content and it's quality here is incredible!!

  • @carlosdelacova1943
    @carlosdelacova1943 2 роки тому +3

    Absolutely beautiful and thought provoking! Thank you!

  • @BoRisMc
    @BoRisMc 2 роки тому +1

    The content of this quality here is incredible!!

  • @brianbell8967
    @brianbell8967 2 роки тому +4

    This channel is superb! Excellent subjects! 👍🏻

  • @paulfarquharson5248
    @paulfarquharson5248 3 роки тому +6

    Excellent programme, you are your own universe.. 🕊

  • @wayneasiam65
    @wayneasiam65 2 роки тому +3

    Love your guests. We're so immersed in our biology. Take in , expelling out and so forth. With everything. Our very own universe may harbor regions of non-standard elemental configurations. Weird, light years long tendrils of different laws. Hemmed in and nurtured by great voids of space.

  • @con.troller4183
    @con.troller4183 Рік тому +2

    A key issue is identified in the first minute. We use the same word, "universe", for two very different things; absolutely everything and everything we can observe.
    If we let "universe" means everything there is, that leaves finding an agreed upon term for everything we can (or could possibly) observe from our location in time and space. That might indeed be everything there is but it is premature of us to say that, so until we know, we need new terminology to describe our local cosmos.
    Suggestions?

  • @alexribeno1612
    @alexribeno1612 21 день тому

    Watched it years ago and thought the same, absolutely brilliant. The whole package in very limited time.

  • @_34_Lies
    @_34_Lies 3 роки тому +1

    Wow, the Bubbleverse... Awesome!

  • @nathc5479
    @nathc5479 3 роки тому +2

    Good to see Leonard susskinds looking well. My favourite physicist.

  • @jasonemryss
    @jasonemryss 3 роки тому +1

    Good show Doctor!!

  • @PurnamadaPurnamidam
    @PurnamadaPurnamidam 3 роки тому

    Great video Lawrence great.

  • @hemant05
    @hemant05 3 роки тому +2

    My fav topic 🍿 🤓

  • @espabilastopkillingthenatu3242
    @espabilastopkillingthenatu3242 3 роки тому +5

    "to come closer to truth you have to fight for truth!!..."best video ever!!!INFINITE LOVE TO INFINITY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>.

  • @mdwoods100
    @mdwoods100 3 роки тому +4

    I love this channel, they ask all the questions, and more, that pester me.

  • @asap..now.
    @asap..now. 3 роки тому +2

    Great!!! Thanks.

  • @Bergarita
    @Bergarita Рік тому

    Its amazing that matter exists at all.

  • @buya3671
    @buya3671 2 роки тому

    This is an amazing video. But it leaves an important question. If science is composed of the dual processes of theoretical/mathematical construction of hypotheses and then the testing of those hypotheses, where are we as far as science is concerned when our we can no longer turn to empirical testing. Do we still have science?

  • @Dion_Mustard
    @Dion_Mustard 3 роки тому +2

    I hope there are an eternal number of universes out there. It would certainly make existence far more interesting and mysterious.

    • @udaybhanuchitrakar8812
      @udaybhanuchitrakar8812 3 роки тому

      @Live Life
      If spacetime is emergent, then the multiverse is an old wives' tale.
      sekharpalongod.wordpress.com/2020/12/28/wave-function-of-the-universe-shows-multiverse-is-impossible/

    • @Dion_Mustard
      @Dion_Mustard 3 роки тому

      @@udaybhanuchitrakar8812 many physicists would disagree. so we must remain open minded. certainly other dimensions exist.

  • @jean-pierredevent970
    @jean-pierredevent970 3 роки тому +2

    Thinking about another universe with the same, but much bigger elementary particles, it struck me that because the scale remains the same, it would all look the same as here. Although there could be a problem with the forces, the light speed.

  • @drognnarthorellan2211
    @drognnarthorellan2211 2 роки тому

    Do all of the potentials especially with the first example exclude entirely expansion of a galaxy from a seperate universe thru cosmic inflation from every entering a new cosmic horizon / "new universe" interaction given time and probability ?

  • @innertubez
    @innertubez 3 роки тому +4

    Wow, mind-blowing episode! I wonder if this means that math is discovered, not invented? Or is it possible for a pocket universe to exist where 1 + 1 does not equal 2?

    • @robbiep742
      @robbiep742 2 роки тому +1

      Watch the "why anything at all" episode. In that episode, Max Tegmark explains that unlike objects we observe, math is not "created" but simply exists, making it more real than anything physical (quite the paradox). He proposes that we live in a mathematical object. The concepts of the laws of math are expanded on in many episodes, but there's a common thread in the philosophy of math that there can only be one way math exists. That it's a brute fact. Although a brute fact in the sense that if we have something rather than nothing, it's necessarily the math we know. An easy example - a circle's circumference. There's no way that it can be any other value. Try to imagine a square with more than four sides... it's not a square.
      With this explanation, 1+1 always equals 2, but it's possible that elements and compounds may have different properties, or the speed of light could possibly be something different ("fine tuning").

    • @topguntk870
      @topguntk870 2 роки тому +1

      What if other universes don't operate on any math, physics, or objects, but something else in its place which would be unimaginable to us in our universe? could there be universes where they have have something better then math? or completely alien concepts and ideas that we couldn't imagine? ill go as far to say not only are there illogical and paradoxical universes like where 1 plus 1 is 3 but even universes where numbers don't exist at all and theres something else entirely incomprensible in its place.

    • @sven888
      @sven888 2 роки тому

      TWO is ONE not wanting to be ALONE. Hence... 1 Corinthians 13:13.

  • @deeplearningpartnership
    @deeplearningpartnership Рік тому

    Nice.

  • @sleepy314
    @sleepy314 3 роки тому

    1:30 Stanford Quad!! Go Cardinal!! Who has the axe now, Cal??

  • @marctrottier3732
    @marctrottier3732 2 роки тому

    ...the most satisfying docs...in our universe, at least...

  • @steve-dn8ru
    @steve-dn8ru 2 роки тому

    Fantastic episode, on a side note, does anyone know what the intro piece of music is from - I'm assuming it's from a classical composer, any help would be greatly appreciated

    • @treewalker1070
      @treewalker1070 2 роки тому +1

      The music on this show is original. The theme is credited to Joseph Schwantner.

  • @Alejandro388
    @Alejandro388 3 роки тому +2

    excellent questions raised! If you're startled by vast proliferation of zillions of universes, do check out Max Tegmark's theory of mathematical universe. Then ask this question: why is there effectively an infinite number of prime numbers? According to Max, there's no fundamental difference between a mathematical entity like prime number a particular branch in the vast multiverse. Also, they are not "evolving" or expanding, inflating etc, to us time-bound creatures it just looks like they do, if for just a second you'd stop giving time-dimension a special role, then you'd realize that there is no movement, no evolution, no expansion, everything is "already there", nothing ever changes, like set of prime numbers. For you it may take centuries to calculate even a tiny fraction of that set, but the set already exists all at once all the time, it never changed one bit, never will. It's just our illusion of passage of time that puts enormous shackles on our power of inquiry and understanding of how things actually work or might work. Whenever such topics come up, i just referre people to take damn a serious read of Max Tegmark's groundbreaking work, and stop watching anymore of those speculations on YT

    • @theuniques1199
      @theuniques1199 3 роки тому

      All numbers are infinite therefore the infinite moment and first moment are the same moment, zero can only replicate zero infinitely, you can't prove your first moment of existence therefore you can only prove your infinite point of existence which is always this present moment repeating itself as this present moment. History can only repeat history, infinite always first believes it is finite to realize it is infinite, repeat, infinite experience always first believes its eyes to realize its infinite experience, repeat. The Universe including humans as the Universe will never change but have always and will always exist as this same exact history of existence, repeat.

    • @jareknowak8712
      @jareknowak8712 3 роки тому

      It always arouses a kind of jealousy in me, that it is so easy for someone, to come to terms with the fact, that time does not exist and is only an illusion.
      Excuse my English.

    • @paulfarquharson5248
      @paulfarquharson5248 3 роки тому

      The infinity merry go round .. the procrastinators something or other

    • @brandursimonsen4427
      @brandursimonsen4427 3 роки тому

      Because if we have a full and static set, then we can be logical about everything. We would need no dictator to explain what is what.

  • @poksnee
    @poksnee 3 роки тому +16

    "How Many Universes Exist? "
    Only one that we know of.

    • @jampoles
      @jampoles 3 роки тому

      There may be another one in which everyone believes it's the only one they know.

    • @mdwoods100
      @mdwoods100 3 роки тому

      bout tree fiddy

    • @poksnee
      @poksnee 3 роки тому

      @@jampoles
      And they would be correct...just as I was.

    • @mrmetaphysics9457
      @mrmetaphysics9457 3 роки тому

      Who ever thinks that they are more than one universe, misunderstand the term!

    • @poksnee
      @poksnee 3 роки тому +1

      @@mrmetaphysics9457
      Agreed.

  • @evanjameson5437
    @evanjameson5437 2 роки тому +1

    There are endless Universes--no end to any of it--only endless extensions.. Actions, reactions, endless possibilities, extra dimensions we cannot see and different types of time. We are only in a patch, a small, small patch..

    • @longcastle4863
      @longcastle4863 2 роки тому

      A little bit of life on a tiny speck of a planet adrift and for all intent and purposes invisible in a vast boundless and forever expanding sea of energy and matter...

  • @zenmusic3429
    @zenmusic3429 2 роки тому +1

    There's a universe in every mind.

  • @hoffmann-photography-Syke
    @hoffmann-photography-Syke 3 роки тому

    The answer to the question is of course "42", as we all know. But it's comforting, that I'll actually win the lottery in a couple of hundred thousand possible universes to come. Perhaps not in this one, but I'm happy for my clones in those other universes.
    Great stuff and really brilliant minds.

  • @trankt54155
    @trankt54155 2 роки тому

    How much of this discussion is speculation and conjecture?

  • @rutbrea8796
    @rutbrea8796 3 роки тому +1

    How awesome if we could travel through all the universe/es? It's so amazing and mind blowing. That a Force in the universe exist, Creator and powerful! Blessed is IT!

  • @guillermobrand8458
    @guillermobrand8458 3 роки тому +7

    For the moment he tries to decipher the mysteries of this universe.

  • @indigatorveritatis7949
    @indigatorveritatis7949 3 роки тому +2

    It makes me mad that we'll never discover all of the universe we occupy, let alone the others. ☹️

  • @peterbroderson6080
    @peterbroderson6080 3 роки тому

    One Universe with multi-dimensions would be better description of these possibilities

  • @jamesruscheinski8602
    @jamesruscheinski8602 3 роки тому

    If the big bang start of universe from quantum fluctuation, could be information from quantum field acting as reverse gravity (inflation) before then gravity after.

  • @jeffk3746
    @jeffk3746 3 роки тому

    Andrei is correct, it’s fractals all the way down

  • @justicewillprevail1106
    @justicewillprevail1106 3 роки тому +2

    I wonder if there’s any way we can test the theory of multi verse...

  • @jamesruscheinski8602
    @jamesruscheinski8602 3 роки тому

    If inflation is reverse gravity, then gravity in some way participate before and after big bang, as gravity has been fundamental since big bang start of universe? Did gravity then exist in another state or form before big bang start of universe? Is the reverse gravity of inflation then necessary for big bang start of universes / multiverse and why gravity exists within a universe? How does gravity go from inflation before big bang start of universe to gravity within the universe after big bang start?

  • @jamesruscheinski8602
    @jamesruscheinski8602 3 роки тому

    Are inflation and quantum mechanics working together in creating multiple universes? The two may be related, perhaps quantum gravity.

  • @Sabinathor
    @Sabinathor 2 роки тому +1

    One thing is certain: we are surrounded by the Infinity... at our scale, at least!

  • @wayneasiam65
    @wayneasiam65 2 роки тому

    No matter how grand or large we envision the multiverse to be , if we could see its entirety we might observe even the multiverse as a speck growing inside something even grander. All of our speculation still doesn't answer the most elemental things. What came first? Where does quantum possibility arise from? What created the very essence of anything? What prompted the first of all beginnings? And why did nothing change into something?

    • @REDPUMPERNICKEL
      @REDPUMPERNICKEL 2 роки тому

      Within the context of a circle, where does it begin?

  • @B.S...
    @B.S... 3 роки тому +1

    One common denominator in all this is (vacuum) energy. Where did it come from? Is it infinite? Can it fuel eternal inflation or infinite multi-worlds? Is there any hope of finding an inflaton?

    • @paulfarquharson5248
      @paulfarquharson5248 3 роки тому

      Not sure about that, but cannot believe we drew against Crystal Palace!

    • @brandursimonsen4427
      @brandursimonsen4427 3 роки тому

      Tegmark explained that with every symmetry the universe breaks into multiple universes. Then the vaacum energy is the difference of outcomes when breaking symmetry. At a distance, the possible outcomes are a potential.

  • @jamesruscheinski8602
    @jamesruscheinski8602 3 роки тому

    Could information from quantum field reach a critical level that triggers inflation? Then maybe inflation reaches critical level for big bang start of universe and gravity, perhaps the creation of gravity particle / quantum gravity? If gravity exist before (inflation), during (big bang) and after (relativity) start of universe, it could generate three dimensions of time in each of which three dimensions of space exist as basis of string theory.

  • @luigicantoviani323
    @luigicantoviani323 2 роки тому

    Lenny and his fairy tales. Very amusing stuff.

  • @digitalfootballer9032
    @digitalfootballer9032 5 місяців тому

    I think the number of universes is either 1 or infinity. I don't think there is any possible middle ground, because if more than one CAN exist, then there should be no limit. But that's the ultimate question, can there be more than one?

  • @GUPTAYOGENDRA
    @GUPTAYOGENDRA 3 роки тому +4

    There may be infinite number of universe but Consciousness which is conscious of them is one.
    Consciousness is singular and fundamental.

  • @hddhesgghg3205
    @hddhesgghg3205 3 роки тому

    Are the 4 different ways to generate multiverse rule each other out? Or it is possible to combine all/some of the ways together to achieve an even larger multiverse/reality? The second way (different domains quizzed off from our regular space-time) is the most similar to biology, where a mother give birth to a child and the child then can create the next generation in what can be an endless chain of creation. Maybe this familiar natural chain of birth in biology, is a fractal that echo similarity to how the large scale of the multiverse behave.

  • @stephenzhao5809
    @stephenzhao5809 3 роки тому +1

    Alan Guth's theory of cosmic inflation is theologically based on Judaism, in particular, the interpretation of the first word, בְּרֵאשִׁית, of the first sentence of the first chapter of the first book of Bible. Hebrew 22 consonant letters are pictographic though it is an alphbet linear language as well. the letter, ב, a house or tent; ראשית, the head, chief leader, the subject, He, of the verb (בָּרָא) of the first sentence:
    בְּרֵאשִׁית בָּרָא אֱלֹהִים אֵת־ הַשָׁמַיִם וְאֵת הָאָרֶץ׃
    JAB (Judism's translation): Within the Beginning, He (Ayn Soph) filled the powers (אֱלֹֹהִים), the skies and the land.
    KJV(Christianity translation): In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
    Obviously, according to JAB, the universe is defined as everthing including God, which means: He and His family all came out of the house, in contemporary cosmological term, Inflationary Big Bang.
    As mentioned in the post, The first resulted from Lucifer, who split from ONE (Deut 6:4), was a Fission Big Bang, simultaneously, got into NONE, and it was immediately disintegrated to the ultimate chaos (תֹּהוּ וָבֹהוּ, Gn1:2 KJV without form and void). Hebrew word, בֹּהוּ, is Emptiness, Nothing the Absolute as suggested by Hegel or in physical term, Vaccum the Absolute (Not Dirac Sea). Therefore, the first bubble from the Fission Big Bang, was absolutely isolated from God the Infinite, and immediately disintegrated to Lucifer dots (Ldot), the ultimate chaos, by Vaccum the Absolute according to the second law of thermdynamics set by God before the Beginning Time Point. In addition, Italian artist Michelangelo also supports that LORD God finished His 6-day creation through His words in His Original Bobble (the Original Universe) in The Creation of Adam en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Creation_of_Adam. Finally, LORD God Is Order the Extremely Asymmetric: He (extremely orderly beautifully) Exists (1) & He Doesn't Exist (0). Lucifer in follow his freewill broke the Original Order, and then a restoration of the original order was triggered, i.e. the six-day creation of LORD God. God is Love, who's given the freewill to all His Integral Components including Lucifer. Totally, there're three times LORD God directly intervenes Luccifer's work, the creation, the redemption, and the judgement. (Gn1,2; 1Jn3:6; Rev20:7~15)
    ua-cam.com/video/K2qnTivUez4/v-deo.html
    Therefore, according to the theology of Christianity, black holes were created after Lucifer was absolutely disintergrated to Ldots. (Gn1:2; Is45:7). Genesis (1:6~8) simply describes how He creates heavens. Hebrew word, רָקִיעַ (Gn1:6) means sheet, אֲשֶׁר (Gn1:7) means cord, in the term of string theory, D-brane and string, respectively.
    May God bless you all. Amen,

  • @jampoles
    @jampoles 3 роки тому

    Why was episode 1102 posted 9 months ago while this episode 203 yesterday? Have all the episodes been recorded already and they are now being released at a random order?

    • @treewalker1070
      @treewalker1070 2 роки тому

      It's a public television series that started in 2000. Not all the episodes are on UA-cam yet and it's hard to figure out the order they are being uploaded here.

  • @rohanjagdale97
    @rohanjagdale97 3 роки тому

    One day experimental explanation of multiverses will definitely possible., if we take this seriously and by hardworking., that day will not so far

  • @dominicseanmccann6300
    @dominicseanmccann6300 2 роки тому

    Any Michios' about, before i begin this journey? "Let me tell you a story.." the Val Doonican of physics!

  • @faisal4455357
    @faisal4455357 2 роки тому

    How all matter came into being , how?

  • @illogicmath
    @illogicmath 3 роки тому

    Episodes are quite old nonetheless they are amusing and current

  • @davidwalker5054
    @davidwalker5054 9 місяців тому

    Do you not think the universe we live in is enough to keep us busy trying to understand. Why worry about other hypothetical universes

  • @bulbul3188
    @bulbul3188 2 роки тому

    universe is a game of someone

  • @almcdonald8676
    @almcdonald8676 3 роки тому

    What is that haunting introductory music ?

  • @yuhuang6912
    @yuhuang6912 3 роки тому +2

    請問您做的 "中國脫貧" 影片為何見不到了? 我很喜歡那影片, 可以放上來嗎? 或是哪裡可以看到?

    • @beyondthehorizon1474
      @beyondthehorizon1474 3 роки тому

      Translate? Explain.

    • @ufotv-viral
      @ufotv-viral 3 роки тому

      👽👍

    • @sleepy314
      @sleepy314 3 роки тому

      @@beyondthehorizon1474 ... roughly translated: "the world is only the Middle Kingdom and outside the wall are only ghosts and suckers." But my Chinese is very rusty.

  • @ciscodealmeida8541
    @ciscodealmeida8541 Рік тому

    Understanding the Universe ! Look at a Sun Flower,there is a central Sun and each petal is a Universe,and there is a infinite number of flowers with a central sun.

  • @PalinuroRex
    @PalinuroRex Рік тому

    That's an oooold computer.

  • @naturemc2
    @naturemc2 3 роки тому +1

    A day when when we probe other universes. That would be a lot of fun.

  • @hertzair1186
    @hertzair1186 3 роки тому +1

    The “Many Worlds Theory” was first posited in the 1957 by physicist Hugh Everett.

  • @rudy8278
    @rudy8278 3 роки тому

    Robert, You should talk to John Hagelin. He is no less controversial than Dean Radin.

    • @rudy8278
      @rudy8278 3 роки тому

      Of course, you could take a quantum leap and talk to Paul Selig and his Guides.

    • @rudy8278
      @rudy8278 3 роки тому

      PS My own take is that our universe is one tree in a forest of universes, a forest with no beginning and no end. Yes, there never was a first, no will there be a last. The paradox of infinite already, but infinity never complete. At least in time.

  • @richardnelson4112
    @richardnelson4112 2 роки тому

    As if there wasn't enough to worry about in this universe. Now other universes are being imagined. No one will ever be able to know, so it seems a waste of time to even ask about it

  • @nicholasheimann4629
    @nicholasheimann4629 3 роки тому +1

    I think 5.

  • @holgerjrgensen2166
    @holgerjrgensen2166 3 роки тому

    Our body is a universe, holds six under-universes, which holds multiple under-universes.
    The number of universes is endless, as the Life-Units, (Life-Unit-principle)

  • @spiritualawareness7736
    @spiritualawareness7736 2 роки тому

    Mind is a Higher Vibrational Frequency Energy which is connected to the physical human Brain Using hyperdimensional technology Links.

  • @jamesruscheinski8602
    @jamesruscheinski8602 3 роки тому

    Multiple universes might become testable if can be demonstrated to come from quantum information as inflation / gravity.

  • @davidsocha8642
    @davidsocha8642 3 роки тому +1

    I really enjoy all your work! Sorry for my sarcasm. When i was 7 years old, i was olways asking OK the Big bag but what before... so frustrated about the immense dogmatique limitation of the alternative way to think our world. ✌🏻👩🏽‍🚀✌🏻

  • @peterbroderson6080
    @peterbroderson6080 3 роки тому

    The word / term Universe means "ONE" ! There may be many dimensions and dual time / space events but all just expands our Universe and doesn't create another. With particle / wave theory the moment "it's" not a particle it is a conscious wave making the structure of the Universe Conscious not matterial, which is. Max Planck conclusion.

  • @willyh.r.1216
    @willyh.r.1216 3 роки тому

    Finite or infinite number of universes, don't matter at our level of cosmology understanding. Any speculation on the topic is free, but not necessarily true.

  • @ujjwalbhattarai8670
    @ujjwalbhattarai8670 3 роки тому

    Universe is one.
    Earth is one.
    Universe is one.

    • @Dion_Mustard
      @Dion_Mustard 3 роки тому

      rubbish.

    • @ujjwalbhattarai8670
      @ujjwalbhattarai8670 3 роки тому

      @@Dion_Mustard the earth is one.
      Earth is divided into different continent, in different countries in different countries different states
      How many part one divided earth but earth is earth.
      In same way Universe is one viable and unviable.
      Multiple Universe is rubbish.
      Universe is viable and unviable.
      But Universe is one.
      Where it expending where it is blocking this is not a problem
      Universe is one
      Universe is one like earth.

  • @moses777exodus
    @moses777exodus 2 роки тому

    Even if there were multiple universes, one would still need to explain the origin of the Laws governing those universes too. Un-directed random material natural processes have never been observed or experimentally demonstrated to be capable of producing any form of laws. As scientifically confirmed, non-material laws are the product of only Mind / Consciousness / Intelligence.

  • @usmanshahid8277
    @usmanshahid8277 Рік тому

    I don’t understand why people love talking about multiple universes if there is no way to test this.

  • @nick_john
    @nick_john 3 роки тому +1

    9:24 Robert, you need to have yourself a nice piece of fairy cake!

  • @jkang471
    @jkang471 2 роки тому

    No matter how many exist, you won’t see even one forever

  • @bluelotus542
    @bluelotus542 3 роки тому

    Seeking the truth from a quantitative perpective doesn't work, for the greatness of God and His energies is inconceivable. Only from the qualitative perspective we can find the truth, but just because truth finds us.

  • @davidsocha8642
    @davidsocha8642 3 роки тому +1

    That is hilarious to see matrialist scientist trying to keep the OLD BOXE to define something that can not be confined in a 🥊. Thank you! 👩🏽‍🚀🙈🙉

  • @jamesruscheinski8602
    @jamesruscheinski8602 3 роки тому

    Our universe might be whatever came from big bang, big bounce or whatever started it.

  • @brandursimonsen4427
    @brandursimonsen4427 3 роки тому

    I finally understood it. Every possible outcome is also every distinction in effect as particles in space and the laws governing them. At large distances the distinctions become large, so as the universe is having different laws. Then there is also a gradient from this universe to every possible umiverse.

  • @ktx49
    @ktx49 3 роки тому

    Sooo many ads! I used to enjoy listening to these while falling asleep but now all I hear are the 30min long ads about toxic poop, Amazon get rich scams & man soap.

  • @seanleith5312
    @seanleith5312 3 роки тому +2

    At last, people realized the world is infinite. What a discovery!

    • @ufotv-viral
      @ufotv-viral 3 роки тому

      👽👍

    • @brandursimonsen4427
      @brandursimonsen4427 3 роки тому

      No. Because the universe we measure is coarse at a plank length. And so the possible universes are a multiple of the size of this. A number with 500 zeros.

    • @seanleith5312
      @seanleith5312 3 роки тому

      @@brandursimonsen4427 None the less, to think that the entirety of our surroundings is a bubble and outside the bubble is nothing, is philosophically wrong. It should be obvious to everyone.

  • @maverick1972
    @maverick1972 3 роки тому

    What if space outside our expanding universe is infinitely empty, I want to know if there are scientists, physicists and cosmologists who have propounded this, and how many are they?

    • @Dion_Mustard
      @Dion_Mustard 3 роки тому +2

      what do you mean "empty space"..if you're referring to nothingness, there is no such thing!

    • @maverick1972
      @maverick1972 3 роки тому

      I've often wondered about how certain people/scientists can be sure about such thing. But what if matter in our universe is only 50 billion or 70 billion light years across (for instance), then outside of this material universe is infinite emptiness that is exactly the same (surprise surprise) as the space between the earth and the moon. That's all I'm conjecturing, a simple hypothetical.

  • @hazardousmaterials1284
    @hazardousmaterials1284 3 роки тому +4

    I’m more interested in the psychology of wanting to believe in multiple universes. I tend to think that people want to believe in such unknowable things because this one universe we definitely have has been rather a disappointment. It’s like believing in aliens back in the 1970s; it makes the unknown parts of existence much more fun!

    • @TheBruces56
      @TheBruces56 3 роки тому

      I'm not sure what you are comparing it to to judge this universe "rather a disappointment". It produced you.

    • @nataliazhuromskaya9144
      @nataliazhuromskaya9144 3 роки тому

      @@TheBruces56 we have a lot of problems, sufferings, incurable diseases in this universe. That's why it's a disappointment.

    • @brandursimonsen4427
      @brandursimonsen4427 3 роки тому

      People seem to escape confinements of beauty in every ugly way.

  • @jamesruscheinski8602
    @jamesruscheinski8602 3 роки тому

    Maybe many universes in one megaverse.

  • @jamesruscheinski8602
    @jamesruscheinski8602 3 роки тому

    Can information from the quantum field generate inflation? How else could inflation come about?

  • @davidsocha8642
    @davidsocha8642 3 роки тому

    Newton univers or information universe? ✌🏻👩🏽‍🚀

  • @DouglasVoigt-tu3xb
    @DouglasVoigt-tu3xb 2 місяці тому

    1. No 2. Maybe 3. Truth…an infinite number.

  • @JerryMlinarevic
    @JerryMlinarevic 2 роки тому

    Answer 10exp70 roughly based on average size of a black hole.

  • @bdjshwbwhdhh1991
    @bdjshwbwhdhh1991 Рік тому

    3

  • @paulwolf3302
    @paulwolf3302 3 роки тому

    The burden is on the proponent of a theory to find evidence to prove it's true. As Carl Sagan said, if there's no evidence to support a theory, you should just forget about it.

  • @odiupickusclone-1526
    @odiupickusclone-1526 3 роки тому +2

    5

  • @jasonhayward6965
    @jasonhayward6965 3 роки тому

    I lost count so well over one hundred thousand around the asteroid we are on .

  • @longcastle4863
    @longcastle4863 2 роки тому +1

    Universes have become the new galaxies. Next constellations of innumerable multiverses will be the new galaxies. And so on... Turtles all the way down, multiplying like rabbits as they go...

  • @richardnelson4112
    @richardnelson4112 2 роки тому

    He said that pocket universes form so rapidly that there may be infinite numbers of them. That makes no sense at all. How in the world can there be infinite numbers of them if they are continuously forming ??? A contradiction of the idea of infinity. That in itself proves that what is being said in this video amounts to pure madness