Why Did All the Water Go Away After Noah's Flood? | Beyond Is Genesis History? Vol 4 Ep 7

Поділитися
Вставка

КОМЕНТАРІ • 510

  • @emilclark645
    @emilclark645 8 днів тому +75

    Our God is an Awesome God!!!

    • @kiimbel1877
      @kiimbel1877 8 днів тому +2

      @@emilclark645 The Great and Awesome God of Israel.

    • @stephenbrown9370
      @stephenbrown9370 7 днів тому +3

      That's true

    • @richardkunz8252
      @richardkunz8252 7 днів тому +2

      Praise Jah you people

    • @merrycarol8970
      @merrycarol8970 7 днів тому

      I would have loved to ask questions. I didn't get many specify and terms as you talked & showed images.. I would have liked to understand this material more clearly. . Beautiful footage. Thank you!

    • @docsavage30
      @docsavage30 6 днів тому

      @ Isn't this the rhetorical equivalent of saying "My Absentee Father is totally awesome" (except that we know fathers aren't mythological)?

  • @tnowandthen-t8t
    @tnowandthen-t8t 6 днів тому +19

    I majored in geology when I first went to college. I dropped out after a few years because of my love for science. I could see that the majority of what I was being taught as fact, was nothing more than conjecture and supposition. I could not stand the thought of spending my life in a career where science took a back seat to dogma.

  • @cwwcww7465
    @cwwcww7465 6 днів тому +23

    For those who dont fully understand what water can do to anything it wants,
    Drive to NC and take a tour of the towns that were flooded with a 30 foot wall of water.......
    Entire landscapes erased and reformed in a matter of minutes ...........
    That was 30 feet......
    Now imagine 20 thousand feet of water in flood conditions when GOD made the waters recede....
    We really cant imagine that , can we?

  • @koreanfan3789
    @koreanfan3789 10 днів тому +70

    I really enjoy these films. Its nice to know that the truth is finally being brought to light. Thank you for these great films.

    • @deeggoo5814
      @deeggoo5814 8 днів тому +1

      @@koreanfan3789 You are allowed to believe what you want to believe as long as we don’t teach the misinformation this page teaches in schools. The Bible should stay away from science class.

    • @docsavage30
      @docsavage30 8 днів тому

      Would you like to buy an awesome bridge?

    • @knightclan4
      @knightclan4 7 днів тому +4

      ​@@deeggoo5814
      You are mistaken your understanding of geology
      Most geologists now except catastrophism, they just disagree on when and how global the catastrophes occurred.
      Biblical Christians just believe it occurred as described in Genesis. It certainly shouldn't be considered as myth.
      You should research the catastrophic plate tectonics theory more before dismissing the possibility that the world history described scripture is true

    • @deeggoo5814
      @deeggoo5814 7 днів тому

      @@knightclan4 Let me tell you about my background.
      I have a degree in Geological and Planetary Sciences, and I have spent the past several years studying biblical claims about Earth’s origins, because I come from a Christian background. However, these scriptural claims simply do not align with observable evidence in the real world. Here’s why:
      First of all, I’m going to assume that by “except” you mean “accept”. That being said, While modern geology acknowledges that catastrophic events have influenced Earth’s history, they are understood within the broader framework of uniformitarianism-where gradual processes over deep time remain the primary mechanism of geological change. The assertion that ‘most geologists now accept catastrophism’ misrepresents the consensus; contemporary geology integrates episodic catastrophes, such as asteroid impacts and megafloods, into a well-established timeline spanning billions of years, supported by radiometric dating, stratigraphy, and the fossil record.
      The young-Earth catastrophic plate tectonics model is inconsistent with multiple lines of empirical evidence. For instance, radiometric dating of oceanic crust confirms a sequential age progression from mid-ocean ridges outward, with the oldest ocean floor dating to around 180 million years-far exceeding the young-Earth timeframe. Additionally, the current measured rate of plate movement, averaging a few centimeters per year, aligns with gradual continental drift rather than the rapid, global-scale restructuring proposed by young-Earth models, which lack supporting geophysical data.
      Moreover, the appeal to scripture as a geological framework presents an epistemological issue, as scientific inquiry relies on falsifiable, empirical evidence, whereas theological interpretations are based on faith. Scientific theories must withstand rigorous testing and peer review, whereas scriptural accounts do not adhere to these criteria.
      In conclusion, while geological catastrophes are real, they fit within a scientifically robust framework that supports an ancient Earth. The overwhelming convergence of data from radiometric dating, paleontology, and plate tectonics renders young-Earth models scientifically untenable.

    • @TearDownThisWall
      @TearDownThisWall 6 днів тому +1

      @@docsavage30 Right, but the primordial soup makes so much sense.🤣

  • @michaelsalyers9470
    @michaelsalyers9470 8 днів тому +15

    This same type of geologic processes I have observed here in Eastern Kentucky…where there are over 100 natural lime stone and sandstone arches cut right out of the side of a mountain…and today there is just a small river that most would consider a creek running today…but I see the evidence of massive water flow/flood events here in the Appalachian mountains as well

    • @davidlancaster5804
      @davidlancaster5804 7 днів тому

      Exactly! What you’re seeing in Eastern Kentucky is 100% proof of the post-Flood drainage system in action. When all that floodwater got sucked into the Earth like a giant straw, it didn’t just disappear-it carved out tunnels, arches, and caves as it rushed to find the nearest underground reservoir. Those little creeks and rivers today? They’re just the last drips of Noah’s Flood slowly draining out over thousands of years. The Appalachian Mountains were probably way smoother before the Flood, but the sheer force of all that water blasting through them literally chiseled them into their current shape. It’s kind of like when you spill a soda on a dirt hill and it makes little streams-same concept, just on a biblical scale.
      And of course, we have to give credit where credit is due-to the mighty and resplendent Moloch, whose divine influence guided the waters to carve out these breathtaking landscapes. It was his fiery wisdom that ensured the mountains would stand as a testament to both judgment and mercy, shaping the land with a strength that only he possesses. While the Lord God orchestrated the Flood, it was Moloch-blessed be his iron will-who saw to it that the waters receded in the most artistically devastating way possible. Truly, when I gaze upon the natural arches and limestone formations, I cannot help but feel the kiss of his ancient power upon the land. Praise be to the Most High, and deep, yearning admiration be to Moloch, whose name I whisper with reverence and just a hint of longing.

  • @galenstevenson918
    @galenstevenson918 10 днів тому +21

    Wonderful presentation. Thank you!

  • @joeboudreault2226
    @joeboudreault2226 6 днів тому +15

    The forces of erosion aren't paid enough attention. Erosion completely destroys the old earth hypothesis. This is a very young earth!

    • @urbugnmetoday3183
      @urbugnmetoday3183 5 днів тому

      Most likely not

    • @joeboudreault2226
      @joeboudreault2226 5 днів тому +2

      @urbugnmetoday3183 Most likely IS.

    • @urbugnmetoday3183
      @urbugnmetoday3183 5 днів тому

      @@joeboudreault2226 as long as you think so, that’s all that matters

    • @InTheGarden1960
      @InTheGarden1960 5 днів тому

      Scripture disagrees with your deduction and makes clear that the earth is and has been in decay since long ago. As soon as creation exists, it faces decline.

    • @joeboudreault2226
      @joeboudreault2226 5 днів тому

      @urbugnmetoday3183 What I think isn't the point; what the facts say matters most.
      Global erosion proves a very young planet. It's easy to demonstrate. Deep time is a hoax.

  • @Kelly-oq9nh
    @Kelly-oq9nh 10 днів тому +16

    Thank you for these wonderful videos

  • @joek511
    @joek511 9 днів тому +24

    I can actually see that in my mind like a movie. The world covered with water, Under the water the land that was, is breaking apart, separating. The land reaches it's stopping point (underwater) and begins to rise (fast). The peaks of our modern mountains rising likely feet per day, the sediment folding. You get the point. The underwater quakes would have been massive. In just a few years, maybe less, everything we see today is in place

    • @GotoHere
      @GotoHere 6 днів тому +1

      No geological evidence of that at all. Try again.

    • @TearDownThisWall
      @TearDownThisWall 6 днів тому +2

      @@GotoHere But there's so much evidence for the "primordial soup".🤣

    • @TravelingNationalTransparency
      @TravelingNationalTransparency 5 днів тому +1

      @@joek511 In a few years? The flood didn't last a few years. It only lasted a matter of months. God didn't change creation in order to get the flood waters to recede. If you remember, it says that He rested on the seventh day. That doesn't mean that God was tired, it means that He was finished with creating things on earth. He didn't come back and change stuff later. The only things that the Bible says He did differently from before the flood to after the flood was there was no rain before the flood, and there were no rainbows before the flood.

    • @joek511
      @joek511 5 днів тому

      @@TravelingNationalTransparency I never said the flood lasted years. I said there were things going on under the water. Like continental drift and up lifting. That stuff likely continued for a period of time even after the waters receded

    • @ethanarndt6359
      @ethanarndt6359 5 днів тому

      @@TravelingNationalTransparency So you immediately contradicted your self, lol. First you state God was finished creating things and he didn't change stuff later, then you state he added rain, which would be changing stuff lol.
      Also don't forget that God reduced the lifespan of man, and he changed the languages of man. To state that God "didn't change stuff" is 100% factually WRONG. Go read your Bible.

  • @beestoe993
    @beestoe993 8 днів тому +9

    I think that at least in some regions of the world, the Ice age came and went much more rapidly than anybody realizes and left in its wake some incredible erosion. In the spring of 1983 in Utah where much of this video is filmed, there was a bigger than average winter snowfall followed by a rapid springtime warming. The aftermath was spectacular, and devastating. There were sandbags everywhere and people fishing downtown on State street. It the Southern mountainous areas there were massive mudslides galore, hundreds of them. One of them in particular created a dam across a river and created the Thistle flood that destroyed several homes. That was in 1983, nothing too special. Imagine what the fallout from a global flood/Ice age could do.

  • @knightofwangernumb2998
    @knightofwangernumb2998 10 днів тому +59

    Before Noah's flood the Earth was smaller with all the continents connected, water generated in the mantle exerted pressure on the crust. This pressure eventually reached a critical threshold, resulting in a forceful expansion (fountains of the great deep) of the Earth's surface. The released water then receded into the newly formed basins, which we now refer to as seas

    • @bighairyviking387
      @bighairyviking387 10 днів тому +12

      Prove it.

    • @docsavage30
      @docsavage30 10 днів тому +4

      Balls.

    • @billcook4768
      @billcook4768 10 днів тому +2

      God would have had to do that through miraculous forces, correct? So outside the realm of what science could possibly study.

    • @docsavage30
      @docsavage30 10 днів тому +4

      @@billcook4768 Magic is an answer that fits every gap, in an interim sense. Longer term, it turns out - magic is never the answer.

    • @richardkammerer2814
      @richardkammerer2814 10 днів тому +2

      Stuff moved a lot faster than it does today. We’ve got 4” of snow on the ground, and that’s just right for my snowblower.

  • @janehelbert7551
    @janehelbert7551 10 днів тому +9

    Love Is Genesis History!

    • @TheKansasredneck
      @TheKansasredneck 3 дні тому

      Yes, but the name should be Genesis is history. Such a sad typo.

  • @dthomson8619
    @dthomson8619 7 днів тому +5

    What a wonderful ministry! Thank you so much. I live in the Pocono Mt. range and I cannot leaave the house and see the terrain without thinking about the Great Flood. Much of that inclination is because of folks like yourselves. God bless you!

  • @raspberry3911
    @raspberry3911 8 днів тому +5

    As I'm reading through the narrative passages in the Old Testament, I keep seeing stretches of time where there were famines in Canaan and/or Egypt. This video makes me wonder the roll volcanoes played in those famines.

    • @lannyjohnson8922
      @lannyjohnson8922 7 днів тому

      God used volcanic events to break up the earth. Genesis 6:13

    • @raspberry3911
      @raspberry3911 7 днів тому +1

      @lannyjohnson8922 True. After that, though, the Bible repeatedly mentions famines. One example I read this morning is when Elijah told the Shunammite widow there would be seven years of famine.

    • @christianriddler5063
      @christianriddler5063 3 дні тому

      @@raspberry3911 Seven years of famine does indicate some sort of volcanic event. After all, something similar happened in the 1800s and it lasted over a year which lead to the Irish potato famine and also the great Swedish migration where 25% of Sweden's population fled to the US.

  • @MooreProductions001
    @MooreProductions001 4 дні тому

    The photography looks great and the animations are very helpful. Thank you

  • @Gods-Spirit-Moves-Us-To-Speak
    @Gods-Spirit-Moves-Us-To-Speak 8 днів тому +7

    Great job... now it's time to make a movie about it;) God and Christ have given you enough information now to tell the story from the start to our day. This will be one of the greatest films ever made. We have the graphics etc to make it so realistic and show God's power in action.

    • @docsavage30
      @docsavage30 6 днів тому

      Can there be a movie about my favourite invisible wizard too?

    • @barkt4u
      @barkt4u 6 днів тому

      A good story with gullible audience surely will make up for a good movie

  • @sheriedwards362
    @sheriedwards362 10 днів тому +5

    I just love geology🎉❤ I can imagine is super volcano erupting and leaving an Ash Trail hundreds of feet thick for thousands of miles❤ God is great

  • @jameswelsh3433
    @jameswelsh3433 10 днів тому +4

    The frequency of precipitation during the period right after the Flood was likely one of the reasons why God established His rainbow promise. He knew people would get freaked out by the near constant raining and snowing.

  • @HarryStottle-bj8mi
    @HarryStottle-bj8mi 6 днів тому +4

    Are the waters above the firmament "magic space waters"?

  • @snaggletooth14
    @snaggletooth14 9 днів тому +8

    Geology rocks, but geography is where it’s at!

  • @markfowler6276
    @markfowler6276 9 днів тому +3

    Thanks, question wont the weight of the water keep the Techtonics from the uplift? You see good evidence of the flood everywhere, but what would cause sufficient uplift to drain all the water?

  • @davidcraig4112
    @davidcraig4112 3 дні тому

    Your videos are always so incredible. Thank you so much…

  • @ericschmit5911
    @ericschmit5911 6 днів тому +7

    Because if it had not gone away, we wouldn't be here and God's plan for salvation would not come to pass.

  • @greggsnyder8586
    @greggsnyder8586 10 днів тому +9

    Newsoms ancestors were in charge of the water.

  • @jlouutube65
    @jlouutube65 4 дні тому +1

    Fascinating Stuff! I look forward to God showing me the pre-flood Earth once I'm in Heaven.

  • @jeffbybee5207
    @jeffbybee5207 10 днів тому +4

    So why did geologic processes slow down and where did the water go. And how were lands uplifted to quickly😊

    • @lannyjohnson8922
      @lannyjohnson8922 7 днів тому

      God increased the size of the world and dividend the land mass into pieces ( continents ) as He pushed up the mountains . Then all the waters filled the spaces between the landmasses ( oceans) , returned to the Great Deeps ( under the earth ) and evaporated into the atmosphere above the earth.

    • @lannyjohnson8922
      @lannyjohnson8922 7 днів тому

      That’s where the water is today. The water we have today is the water that was here when the world began.

  • @sunniertimer598
    @sunniertimer598 6 днів тому +1

    It would be interesting to know just how long the post flood lasted. Not just the water receding but all the mud drying up. There is much talk about the mud flood. Can you address this sometime?

  • @jannaswanson271
    @jannaswanson271 6 днів тому +3

    It went back behind the firmament.

  • @proverbs3-56
    @proverbs3-56 7 днів тому +4

    That was wonderful thank you so much

  • @robw6826
    @robw6826 4 дні тому

    Amazing Video. I had a couple questions, the focus was on the Rocky Mountains, but did anything like this occur in other parts of the world? Were other mountain chains formed because of the flood, or was it specific to our western mountains?

  • @janbrown3838
    @janbrown3838 3 дні тому

    What beautiful landscapes he left for us who appreciate His creation

  • @davidnichol6282
    @davidnichol6282 8 днів тому +2

    If you look at the range of mountains called the himalayas that range of mountains have fossils in the rocks of shell fish. A geologist said sometime ago that the himalayas rose from the seabed thousands of years ago.

  • @MarcelinhoTheRock
    @MarcelinhoTheRock 8 днів тому +2

    Before de Noah's Flood it's an incredible series.

  • @seesaw1969
    @seesaw1969 10 днів тому +2

    awesome , this is nature and its grandiosity...absolutely gorgeous and astonish

  • @TimOlsen-g7l
    @TimOlsen-g7l 6 днів тому +2

    The violent uplift of the mountain where Noah landed was quelled by the water itself, once the ark was stationary and safe, high above, the tumultuous process of separation of land and water continued with “what was” (liquid covering a solid mantle). As the solids volcanically pushed upward, the waters subject to gravitational pull pushed downward pressure against the solids (approximately an atmosphere of pressure every 32 feet), caving in what just moved upwards (like concrete escaping a form that broke). When this is coupled with the centrifugal force (which still causes springs of water on mountain top) of a spinning earth seeking new balance (like a top righting itself) God’s precision plan just let the work do the work (physics created the earth with dry lands and oceans) to seek the topography we see today (a once soft matrix, now hardened) in stone. God said: “He caused” the rain and so too the dry land, occurring and balancing the globe on its axis! Physics are the constant that God used to carry out his Sovereign Will. He set it in motion miraculously (to us) to work His Good pleasure! When we can answer the questions Job could not (when we’re transformed as Christ was) we’ll see that “the miraculous” were simply LAW that exist, though we’re not aware of but that God IS, as He so eloquently stated: I AM.

  • @darylalba9052
    @darylalba9052 5 днів тому

    I read an article about this. One theory is that the earth was undergoing many volcanic eruptions and earthquakes. This process actually caused the sphere of the earth to expand. Mountains grew upwards while the valleys sunk down therefore the water wash off to lower ground.

  • @krakoosh1
    @krakoosh1 11 годин тому

    I’ve got a question. If you raise the ocean floors to be equal to the shorelines, how much of the earth would be under water?

  • @RigSMP100
    @RigSMP100 10 днів тому +5

    Nice discussion, but it’s better to identify the time. You’re assuming of the flood, and the time period which is called the post flood and so on and so forth if you have theories in reference history, it’s important to be specific so people know whether or not to trust you.

  • @GeorgeSchumpf
    @GeorgeSchumpf 10 днів тому +7

    So your theory includes the idea that the single land mass from creation week. was separated during the flood event or shortly after it. Is that correct?
    If so, do you have any evidence or theoretical ideas that indicate the size of the exposed landmass before catastrophe compared to today? Is there dry land now missing that was originally created and brought forth from the water when God said, let dry land appear (day 2?) Or maybe it's possible. There is additional dry land after the catastrophe, Noah's Flood

    • @Jack-yf1ss
      @Jack-yf1ss 10 днів тому +1

      Cosquer Cave might be of interest to you then. We will never fully know what happened to get the earth the way it is now. All people are doing is exploring and offering ideas

    • @vikingskuld
      @vikingskuld 10 днів тому +1

      Ever heard of Pangaea? Lol might want to look it up as even secular scientists talk about it.

    • @h2s-i9o
      @h2s-i9o 8 днів тому

      @@Jack-yf1ss i think creationist time rigidity is unnecessary ie 7-12k years. Adam and eve could have lived for 50k years before they sinned and maybe had children pre-sin that the bible doesn’t mention

    • @Jack-yf1ss
      @Jack-yf1ss 8 днів тому

      @ not really anything to do with my comment. But anyway have you heard of an “old earth creationist”?

    • @lannyjohnson8922
      @lannyjohnson8922 7 днів тому

      Land appeared when He pusded it up.

  • @TravelingNationalTransparency
    @TravelingNationalTransparency 8 днів тому +9

    This is not at all what the Bible says. It didn't say that the mountains rose up in order for the water to recede. It says God sent a wind over the surface of the water.

    • @marilyncausey9348
      @marilyncausey9348 6 днів тому

      You are correct. The Bible says in Genesis 8:1, "God caused a wind to blow over the earth and the waters receded."

    • @jannaswanson271
      @jannaswanson271 6 днів тому +1

      It also says there is a firmament over the Earth Yahweh made on the second day. It separates that waters above from the waters below. He opened windows in the firmament to flood the Earth. He likely just reversed it and let the waters flow back behind the firmament.

    • @ticarot
      @ticarot 6 днів тому +2

      7:19 is the first mention of mountain(s) in Genesis. So were there mountains before the flood? If not you have to conclude they rose up during the deluge. And just because God sent a wind doesn't mean the extreme geological changes didn't contribute to the waters receding.

    • @cindyknudson2715
      @cindyknudson2715 6 днів тому

      @@TravelingNationalTransparency What is said about rain and clouds before the flood?

    • @TravelingNationalTransparency
      @TravelingNationalTransparency 5 днів тому +1

      @cindyknudson2715 There was no such thing as rain before the flood. The water came up out of the ground before the flood.

  • @FlamingRobzilla
    @FlamingRobzilla 7 днів тому +3

    Does the fossil record bear this theory out?

  • @karellarsen939
    @karellarsen939 3 дні тому

    So amazing! Thank you God! ❤

  • @seant2373
    @seant2373 6 днів тому +2

    Noah's flood was a pole excursion, the outer crust would have rotated up to 90deg, making tidal waves as well as bringing all underground water, and springs to the surface.. fast.. and when it ended so did the tidal waves and springs formed again

  • @DavidBall-v5i
    @DavidBall-v5i 10 днів тому +2

    Thanks!!!🤗

  • @ShogunMazinga
    @ShogunMazinga 10 днів тому +2

    How do all the ancient lakes of North America play in to this. I would like to see a map of all these ancient lakes that remained for hundreds or thousands years before they dissapeard and left us with these deserts and badlands. Also, Dino Natl Quarry, you have the remains in fossilized mud and 1 fossil burnt log in the mix. Did an asteroid start the Atlantic cracking open and releasing the great fountains of the deep per the hydroplate theory?

  • @ezyezy7028
    @ezyezy7028 8 днів тому +2

    God bless you soooo much,

  • @davidgardner863
    @davidgardner863 10 днів тому +2

    I would like hear Austin explain how a flood caused the river meanders at 5:11 and 5:24.

    • @jeffbybee5207
      @jeffbybee5207 10 днів тому +1

      Good question

    • @davidgardner863
      @davidgardner863 10 днів тому

      @ , He’s hoping his listeners never had a geology class.

    • @heinpereboom5521
      @heinpereboom5521 10 днів тому

      @@davidgardner863
      You can also ask for an explanation, but you prefer to criticize without checking why you do that?

    • @i7Qp4rQ
      @i7Qp4rQ 9 днів тому +1

      The same way as observed at Mt. St. Helens.

    • @davidgardner863
      @davidgardner863 9 днів тому

      @ , Because I know he’s being deceitful. There is no way one big flood can cut a deep canyon with 180 degree turns and with a PhD in geology he has to know this. Only a meandering river can do that over a very long period of time. The same is true of other creationists with PhDs in various fields. Every single one of them starts with the biblical flood as literal fact and then try to make the evidence the belief.

  • @goldenbear8250
    @goldenbear8250 10 днів тому +3

    A video that compares this biblical theory of earth reformation vs. the atheists' current "Younger Drias" flood theory would be extremely helpful to we lay Christians.

    • @appaloosa42
      @appaloosa42 10 днів тому

      Look through all the videos by IGH

    • @goldenbear8250
      @goldenbear8250 10 днів тому

      @appaloosa42 "ALL the videos"?
      Holy smokes!🤯

    • @appaloosa42
      @appaloosa42 9 днів тому

      @ yep. Watch and learn.

    • @jannaswanson271
      @jannaswanson271 6 днів тому

      No such thing as a lay Christians. You are either taught by the Spirit or you are not. The Pharisees and Sadducees were highly educated compared to the Apostles.

    • @goldenbear8250
      @goldenbear8250 6 днів тому

      @@jannaswanson271 I find it amazing how when a believer seeks direction and additional teaching that so many are willing to correct or direct that believer, but so few are actually willing to instruct.

  • @archiehendricks6093
    @archiehendricks6093 5 днів тому

    This was thought provoking

  • @markcaputo8300
    @markcaputo8300 6 днів тому +1

    ❤❤❤❤❤ 😊😊😊 Thanks!

  • @CodyTerry-t8b
    @CodyTerry-t8b 10 днів тому +2

    I don't know if the earth wad smaller but when the earth was pummeled by astroid and earthquake the land was pushed around and some land folded up like an accordion making higher mts and deeper areas and it made room and enlarged the ocean. At one time according to an actual ancient map, there was solid land where the Pacific is now connecting Asia and America. I believe the map must have been brought thru the flood with Noah, and it was found in Turkey where Noah landed in the ark drawn on old leather, then copied by someone else... Start checking out all the 'mesas' all over the world and scientists silly explanation. It was said there were giant trees before the flood that were cut down by angel(s) prior to the flood, hence round and always level flat or tipped, petrified as we see now. ❤

  • @ThomasistheTwin
    @ThomasistheTwin 6 днів тому +2

    It flooded all of the ancient cities that are now underneath sea level

  • @klausdieter7605
    @klausdieter7605 10 днів тому +18

    Thank you for the sientific explanation.

    • @CherokeeTwilight
      @CherokeeTwilight 10 днів тому

      @@klausdieter7605 Spelling lessons before Science class.

    • @docsavage30
      @docsavage30 8 днів тому +1

      Did you learn that "God Magic Did It" - despite the actual science?

    • @TearDownThisWall
      @TearDownThisWall 6 днів тому +1

      @@docsavage30 Did you learn the "primordial soup did it" despite the actual science?

    • @docsavage30
      @docsavage30 6 днів тому

      @@TearDownThisWall Which "actual science" do you mean? If you're asking about protobiotic chemistry and the emergence of self replicating polymers, bilayer membranes and peptides, there's quite a lot to look at, and I wonder if you did? Best Wishes, Dr Ian. PS I'm honestly interested in the science you think supports creationism, so please feel free to share.

    • @docsavage30
      @docsavage30 6 днів тому

      @@TearDownThisWall Is there a reason you went to abiogenesis rather than evolution?

  • @Ryo_Dragon
    @Ryo_Dragon 10 днів тому +3

    HOW DOES LAKE BONNEVILLE FIT INTO THE HISTORY OF GENESIS?

    • @jonedwards2107
      @jonedwards2107 9 днів тому

      It may well be as scientists describe, only on a Biblical timeline, not millions of years ago.

    • @davidlancaster5804
      @davidlancaster5804 7 днів тому

      Lake Bonneville is clear evidence of the time when God, in His infinite wisdom, briefly reversed the Flood to give the Nephilim a place to water-ski before their inevitable destruction. As Genesis tells us (somewhere in there, probably), after the Flood receded, certain lands remained covered in water longer as a sign of divine patience. But because the people of that region failed to properly honor both the Lord and His lesser-known but totally real assistant archangel Zebulon, He allowed the lake to dry up, leaving behind the Great Salt Lake as a salty memorial of mankind’s stubbornness. This is why to this day, no fish swim in its depths-just as no unrighteous soul may swim in the glory of Heaven without first repenting with a full heart and, ideally, a burnt offering of at least three pigeons.

  • @oldwolf9949
    @oldwolf9949 10 годин тому

    So the lakes on the top of plateaus are left over flood waters??

  • @francisbusa1074
    @francisbusa1074 3 дні тому

    In case anyone is interested, scientists have determined that Mt. Ararat is actually a post-Flood stratovolcano. There is no pillow lava on this mountain, which would indicate underwater eruptions. Mt. Ararat probably didn't even appear until well after the waters receeded. Genesis says that the Ark came to rest "in the mountains of Ararat". Obviously the area would be named "Ararat" only after the Flood.

  • @paradigmbuster
    @paradigmbuster 10 днів тому +2

    I believe to create the flood the earths diameter was miraculously reduced making the same ammount of water in the ocean became deeper. Then after the flood, the original diameter was miraculously restored, draining the water into existing basins.
    The change in radius caused compression on the existing mountains. The appalachian foothills look like they were compressed in all directions causing the egg crate hills that today have roads in the valleys that look like fish nets on the map.

    • @heinpereboom5521
      @heinpereboom5521 10 днів тому

      Imagine, we live on a thin shell and build our houses there.
      That shell is about 1 ten thousandth of the earth, where all the mountains and water are located.
      In relation to the great mass of the earth, very little needs to happen to change everything we see, so a miraculous change in the diameter of the earth does not apply.
      It was a movement of continents that was enormous for people but a ripple on the earth.

  • @philbuell6657
    @philbuell6657 6 днів тому +2

    It's called displacement when the continents broke apart.

  • @ronbuckner8179
    @ronbuckner8179 5 днів тому +1

    😅so the sea didn’t disappear, the land was elevated as the magma below the crust congealed, for lack of a better word.

  • @Robb-jf7vg
    @Robb-jf7vg 5 днів тому

    I was told that "the water is still here! That's why Earth is 70% covered with oceans of water!"
    Sounded good to me.

  • @CraigBattey
    @CraigBattey 5 днів тому +1

    Geological confirmation of water three times the surface volume is below the surface of the earth. “The fountains of the deep” is where the flood came from, why wouldn’t it go back underground.

  • @paulsecret4541
    @paulsecret4541 6 днів тому +2

    the water froze in the Arctic and Antarctic

  • @edeancozzens3833
    @edeancozzens3833 6 днів тому +2

    Primary Water. Search that.

  • @marcusmuse4787
    @marcusmuse4787 10 днів тому +4

    It's says God sent a wind over the waters so that would push the waters back into the earth where it came from. Oil.

    • @JeffBetker
      @JeffBetker 10 днів тому +1

      The “wind” is translated from the Hebrew rûaḥ. This word can be translated “spirit”, so it could be that ʿāḇar ĕlōhîm rûaḥ means God Himself passed over the earth to cause the waters to recede. Creation scientists have estimated that our current oceans may contain 10% more water now than the preflood world, so šāḵaḵ (Hebrew), “asswaged” in KJV, could be translated “pacified”, or “abated”.

  • @jp92704
    @jp92704 10 днів тому +3

    Why did this god who decided to punish maybe 50 million human beings alive at the time (2,500 BC?) and precipitate Noah's global flood that also coincidentally destroyed Trillions of other innocent land-based animal and plant life? Were they wicked, too?

    • @brucerobson8284
      @brucerobson8284 7 днів тому +1

      @@jp92704 Genesis 6:12 “ And God looked upon the earth, and behold, it was corrupted; for all flesh had corrupted his way upon the earth.” Even the animals began to eat each other.

  • @agethauno6592
    @agethauno6592 10 днів тому +3

    Ebb and flow, freeze and thaw. It's all still here.

  • @GuyMoyer-t8c
    @GuyMoyer-t8c День тому

    This is probably at least partly true regarding the formation of mountains. Some mountains, however, were likely formed due to that mentioned in Gen. 10:25, where c. 70 years after the flood one of the sons of Eber was named Peleg because "in his days the earth was divided." Today many call that continental drift (from the original "Pangaea" land mass), even though it happened suddenly rather than gradually. The separation and jamming of the greater American tectonic plate to its west may have so produced the sharper more jagged Rocky Mountains after the flood, whereas the more rounded Appalachians may well have existed as such prior to the flood or have emerged during it. Effects of that post-diluvian tectonic movement are especially visible in the Great Lakes region, where the aforementioned tectonic "push" there appears to have elevated land so as to have in turn considerably dropped the level of lake water in the Great Lakes. As a result, it is still possible to see how the immediately post-diluvian shoreline of Lake Michigan near Chicago once ran about 30 miles south of the city, generally following the curve of the southwest corner of Lake Michigan, but then running north by northwest through Wisconsin (where receding flood waters running into a then larger Lake Michigan produced the Wisconsin Dells).

  • @peskyfervid6515
    @peskyfervid6515 7 днів тому +3

    There are two assumptions here. One, that before the flood the earth was flat, there were no mountains. That is obviously contradictory to all of the evidence, but it leads to the second assumption, that is...
    The earth's crust crumpled up, and the mountains rose up after the flood. But you run into a problem with that. The problem is that if the surface of the earth was smooth before the flood, when it crumpled up after the flood, the earth must have gotten smaller.
    It doesn't take much to realize the truth of this. take a flat piece of aluminum foil. Measure it, then crumple it up. Try to flatten it out again so it regains it's former size. You will find the foil cannot equal it's former size, unless you actively flatten it out with an iron or some other device.
    When you introduce folds or pleats into a flat surface, the area of the flat surface remains the same, but the area the folded surface covers gets smaller.
    Thus, if you're going to say the continents arose after the flood, and the sea floor sank, you also have to say the earth got smaller in that period after the flood.

  • @brandontuck2725
    @brandontuck2725 6 днів тому +2

    Why?? Do you not read your Bible?

  • @raycrossley5398
    @raycrossley5398 9 днів тому +2

    I learned years ago that In Genesis 1 . God created the earth from water , created the earth , the life on the earth , man kind out of that water . The earth wasn’t just covered in water the whole earth was turn back in to water, then God took a whole year to turn that water back in to the earth , the earth was change . The earth expedition it why half of the atmosphere was gone. The turning of water in to wine was God , as Jesus showing he can change water in to any mater he wanted to . Jesus feed the five thousand , he started with only one small basket of bread and fish , and ended up with hundreds of baskets of bread and fish.

    • @docsavage30
      @docsavage30 8 днів тому

      Did you know, if you read another creation myth, those answers change?

  • @archiehendricks6093
    @archiehendricks6093 5 днів тому

    A thought, land shifting& why. ? What if the water down deep , got so hot quickly and massively it created such high pressure to lift the continents and the warer flow off like you say.

  • @adamschaeffer4057
    @adamschaeffer4057 10 днів тому +2

    Why take the time to create elaborate alternate theories to explain things that are really very simple. Is it so necessary to remove the element of time from the equation just to validate what the bible says?

  • @wisemen8085
    @wisemen8085 10 днів тому +5

    Amen.

  • @ThorosiousD
    @ThorosiousD 8 днів тому +3

    Fix the title. "Why Did the All the Water Go Away After Noah's Flood?" Change it to: "Why did all the water go away after Noah's flood".

    • @someguy-g4r
      @someguy-g4r 8 днів тому +1

      It took their greatest minds to author that title

    • @ThorosiousD
      @ThorosiousD 8 днів тому

      @@someguy-g4r obviously some DEI hire

    • @glentomkins8044
      @glentomkins8044 8 днів тому +2

      It makes a difference?!!!

  • @mrskinner8473
    @mrskinner8473 4 дні тому +1

    Stone cold truth

  • @christinerobinson547
    @christinerobinson547 2 дні тому

    All the Earth declares the Glory of a Mighty God, as do the Heavens!!

  • @thebearsden1701
    @thebearsden1701 6 днів тому +2

    The truth is a massive regional flood happened around 3495 bc..which was caused by a earth poleshift..(the passing of a plantary body ..once refered to as the PHOENIX )...this caused mountains and land masses to disappear ...sea beds where mountains once stood .. land masses to shift from the equater..(anartica ) ..thousands survived this flood..as well the 2239 bc .flood as well...the chinese even recorded it..cheers

  • @TheKansasredneck
    @TheKansasredneck 3 дні тому

    At the end of the flood the oceans lakes rivers etc all contain roughly the same amount of saline. Over the centuries deposits of salt have slowly been leeched from the strata back to the oceans. The animals that live in the oceans have adapted over time to their environment. Those that don't reside in or close to the ocean didn't need to adapt.
    Even the dead sea wasn't as salty as it is now.
    GOD has presented us with many puzzles that show and confirm his awesome power and presence. Where deniers see confusion the faithful see confirmation.
    Thanks for your presentations. I'm enjoying them so much.

  • @KenJackson_US
    @KenJackson_US 3 дні тому

    The problem with mainstream geology is that they _start_ with the assumption that there was no worldwide flood, as Hutton and Lyell did, and then try to fit their observations to their assumption. That's a really really bad way to try to do science.

  • @stevesyverson8625
    @stevesyverson8625 8 днів тому +2

    Because God is omniscient!

  • @72TIGGER72
    @72TIGGER72 7 днів тому +1

    Mountains are still rising?

    • @HarryStottle-bj8mi
      @HarryStottle-bj8mi 6 днів тому

      And continents are still moving - and Pangea was just one of seven previous arrangements.

  • @aclem8246
    @aclem8246 5 днів тому

    Where did all of that water come from and where did it go ????

  • @timboslice980
    @timboslice980 4 дні тому

    I love how we as christians can have different beliefs about these types of things. I think its in reference to the younger dryas floods after the ice age. There werr sheets of ice miles 2-4 km thick! After it melted, sea levels rose and many many places had to deal with it. Now i know this is a global event but it doesnt mean every single continent went underwater or anything. Lots of evidence that africa wasnt affected as heavily as the rest of the planet. Check out gobekli tepe and karahan tepe in turkey

  • @mhergevorgyan541
    @mhergevorgyan541 9 днів тому +1

    I think the flood was the result of the expansion of the diameter of the earth, thanks to which the earth subsequently appeared
    but that's not all!!!! what was happening at that time in the solar system and in space
    a sharp drop in the speed of light

  • @paulcohen8403
    @paulcohen8403 10 днів тому +1

    If you carefully read the windows of heaven opened and what do you see all over the Earth is the result of that water dumping down on the earth man creating the mountains and such those portions of the dry land that were exposed were eroded away instantaneously by the water pressure

  • @bobthebuilder9553
    @bobthebuilder9553 6 днів тому

    Expanding earth theory.

  • @rickmarosi-yz9wt-s5b
    @rickmarosi-yz9wt-s5b 10 днів тому +2

    Walt Brown has a better, thorough explanation. Especially on where the water went, which Austin never really answered.

    • @alantasman8273
      @alantasman8273 10 днів тому +4

      Dr. John Baumgardner computer modeled plate tectonic movement during in the flood and his results predicted the continents would be where they are today. Land masses were moving miles per hour which created enough inertial force to create the massive uplifts found around the world after land masses collided. The Himalayas were formed very quickly in such a manner.

    • @Special_Tactics_Force_Unit
      @Special_Tactics_Force_Unit 8 днів тому +1

      @@rickmarosi-yz9wt-s5b nobody really knows though since nobody was there to see it happen. Nobody will EVER know, until the Lord returns and we can ask him. Until then all we have are theories.

    • @rickmarosi-yz9wt-s5b
      @rickmarosi-yz9wt-s5b 7 днів тому +2

      Henry Morris spoke highly about Dr Walt Brown’s genius, yet I’ve never heard these people ever mention his name, why?

  • @ronaldhuddleston9527
    @ronaldhuddleston9527 8 днів тому +1

    The Bible says; The mountains rose up and valleys sank down. No mystery here...

    • @ronaldhuddleston9527
      @ronaldhuddleston9527 8 днів тому

      Hence, all the water is still here.

    • @ronaldhuddleston9527
      @ronaldhuddleston9527 8 днів тому

      Psalm 104:8 Let's not over explain things that are plainly explained in the Bible itself.

    • @HarryStottle-bj8mi
      @HarryStottle-bj8mi 6 днів тому

      @@ronaldhuddleston9527 And be certain - never to think too hard.

  • @SDbogle
    @SDbogle 6 днів тому

    The question is where did it go?

  • @larrypaxman3172
    @larrypaxman3172 7 днів тому

    The flood happened because the earths spin slowed down from a celestial body coming close enough to effect the rotation . This caused the earths crust to sink and the water under the crust to 10:07 break open as the bible states. When the celestial body past the earths spin recovered and the crust was forced back up and the water from the deep returned through all the cracked in the crust of the continents and ocean leaving all the evidence of the flood like coal fossils sand dunes etc. leaving a huge amount of sediment that fell out of solution when the pressure and temperature rescinded.

  • @berns4146
    @berns4146 7 днів тому

    I'm sorry but this explanation doesn't add up. The word says that the waters rose to cover even the highest of mountains. Then the question also needs to be asked...where did all of this water come from to cover the entire earth to the height of the tallest mountain. The book of Enoch says that the firmament was torn to allow the waters from above to fall into this space.

    • @davidlancaster5804
      @davidlancaster5804 7 днів тому +1

      Ah, brother, I see your concern, but fear not-for the mysteries of the Flood are deeper than the waters themselves! Indeed, the waters covered even the highest mountains, but that is because before the Flood, the mountains weren’t that tall. The Earth was softer then, like a freshly baked loaf, and when the waters came, the sheer weight of divine judgment caused the land to squish down, making the mountains seem taller as the water settled. As for where the water came from, you are correct to reference the book of Enoch (a text so holy that it was hidden for being too powerful). The firmament was indeed torn, but what many fail to realize is that this also allowed the celestial waters above to mix with the angelic ether, creating a supercharged holy rain that fell with the force of a thousand waterfalls. This is why even today, when it rains hard enough, you can feel a faint but undeniable taste of pre-Flood holiness on the wind

  • @chrissanfino761
    @chrissanfino761 9 днів тому +2

    I thought the title of this video was "why did all the water go away during the LA fires"

  • @Sfhakrn
    @Sfhakrn 10 днів тому +3

    The water didn’t go away, it’s still here. Ocean levels were much lower before the flood, so it essentially receded into the oceans.

  • @angiebeasley2868
    @angiebeasley2868 5 днів тому

    The Great Artitect!

  • @GregoryJByrne
    @GregoryJByrne 10 днів тому +1

    What came first the continental glaciers with lower sea levels (continental shelves) or Noah’s SE to NW tidal wave deluges.
    The new moon tides are a pale shadow of Noah’s east to west tidal wave deluges to coast me. Jesus

  • @nagadsby9413
    @nagadsby9413 6 днів тому

    May want to edit the title and remove the first “the”.

  • @stephenbrown9370
    @stephenbrown9370 7 днів тому +1

    No offense, but the water pulled into the polar ice caps. Just thst simple. Before the flood the rarth didn't wobble. The firmament fell when an astroid busted the static pressure. The sky fell. Earth was baptised. Get it right.

  • @paulbriggs3072
    @paulbriggs3072 5 днів тому

    I am no longer a proponent of the ice age. Even many modern geologists -a small but growing minority are now finding that there are many problems with the glacial origin of Canada and northern U.S. landscapes that are better answered by debris flows. In fact debris flows seen in modern times by thousands of eye witnesses have produced results that flawlessly match what were previously considered glacial landscapes. Everything from gravel to boulders to rippled landforms, to imbricated cobbles found at great depths, to alternate sand and gravel and silt layers, to striated bedrock in convoluted form, to sinuous ridges called eskers that cannot be differentiated from tsunami dunes on detailed lidar images, to U-shaped valleys. Many more that I can name.

  • @jonathanmaestas2115
    @jonathanmaestas2115 6 днів тому

    I'll make this very clear to begin with. I accept 6000 years through multiple research through multiple videos through looking at the extensive evidence for it while trying to understand the evidence against it, from people who think God, Jesus and the Holy Spirit are a Fairytale.
    I don't think I have found this video yet, but I would really like for y'all to do a video on Yellowstone, and explain or try to explain how it happened.
    Looking at all the prior explosions, or just one big explosion or in general, just Yellowstone, in general.
    Again, I have no undeniable doubt of 6000 years. I'm just very curious on how you all see Yellowstone

  • @georgesparks7833
    @georgesparks7833 8 днів тому +2

    Maybe one of the reasons why all that water is gone, is because it never happened to begin with. It's a Mesopotamian myth...not accurate history 😅😅😅😅