has anyone addressed the copyright ability of these AI generated images? until the courts settle that I would be wary to produce any kind of product with these programs
Yes, it has been ruled on. Ai generated images are not copyrightable. The next step will be class action lawsuit and demanding restitution from plagiarists. Justice is coming for all the thievery done here by stupid people thinking they can get away with robbing artists. Its gonna be bloody.
00:27 🎨 Project Primrose creates flexible textiles that display content, allowing patterns to change and even animate, controlled by body movement. 01:22 🎥 Project Fast Fill (Gen fill for video) enables seamless integration of elements into videos with impressive motion tracking and light adaptation. 02:58 🧳 Fast Fill is ideal for subtle enhancements like removing small elements or fixing continuity errors, rather than dramatic changes. 03:12 🌆 Project Scene Change effortlessly combines subjects and backgrounds from different videos, offering stable and impressive compositing abilities. 04:48 📸 Project Scene Change even generates contextual shadows on subjects for addedrealism. 05:15 🎭 Project Posable allows users to pose AI-generated characters and associate props for contextual interactions, offering a simplified 3D character manipulation tool. 07:07 🏠 Adobe Illustrator now includes generative fill, enabling the creation of 3D objects from generated vector images for use in animations.
Need to see it. The Photoshop AI stuff looked amazing in the demos and is crushingly underwhelming as it is, and that is on static images. I can' thelp but feel that these are very, very controlled examples. Look at the items on the table. They are basically custom made with tracking codes to make them easier to track in 3D.
"underwhelmed" is the exact emotion i had from the PS generative functions... and if it's bad in PS... then...AE? yeah good luck... it's like the marketers never considered we'd try to use this stuff in real production environments...
@@DamianHanley239 I think it’s a first step. There isn’t really a great pipeline from AI devs to Full Production, so…for better or worse. Adobe is the only company with the muscle to build that bridge. It’ll be a messy bridge, with lots of potholes, and will collapse at least once…meanwhile we will always pay the toll- but, at least the bridge will be built and the normalization of AI in production can begin.
@@TheoreticallyMedia yeah i mean... i know you're right... it's gonna take time... but the dang marketing they use makes it looks amazing!... i guess that's the function of marketing though :)
Should I go to work today? With "Everything Changed", how will I learn to function in the world again? I need to know, what still works and what doesn't.
You can not show up. If your boss asks where you are, just send them a screenshot of this thumbnail. They'll leave the office as well...and on and on it will go, until.... Well, I guess it'll be a global day off. I think we could all use it.
I'm less worried about Adobe when it comes to having a mental breakdown about AI. For me, it is more about all the angles happening at once. Images, video, 3d, voices, music, LLMs, robots, etc. Consider that GPT-4 was done training before ChatGPT was even made public, so what do they have now? MidJourney said they just finished sourcing their video training data. Gemini is coming in probably less than a month. AI Explained channel was just showing advancements in artificially generated video for training cars and robots, and last video about discoveries of using lots of disparate robot training data gives a better result even than what the original data was for. 2024 is going to be pretty crazy I think.
I'm actually interested to see more of the generate fill in after effects. That was impressive. That would be really handy for any slight or medium changes for video you want to edit.
It is. It’s a very 2.5d animation thing, but still handy. I do think we’ll be seeing some major strides coming out of text to 3d models in the next few months. Or…maybe even weeks…
When AI came out with stable diffusion : NOOO IT IS STEALING ART AND CREATIVITY. When ADOBE created AI model from Adobe stock contents(provided by millions of individuals) : YEEE, AI IS FUTURE, I LOVE AI, I WILL GIVE MY 1 KIDNEY AS "CREDIT POINTS"
Haha, yeah I’m not at all a fan of the credit system. I talk about that a bit in the “no hype” look at Firefly 2. I’ll say this to Adobe’s credit: by putting it into industry standard software, we’re on the road to industry standard usage. Which, might be good or bad, but at least it’ll normalize the use of AI, which to be honest is still kind of a fringe technology. My greater concern is that Adobe becomes THE name for creative AI, and that’s never a good thing either.
Wife told me I was nuts because, I believe, we will be able to ask AI to show as a never before seen movie of our choice using custom parameters... whenever we want. This will happen in my lifetime.
1000% will. The weird part about it is how it'll sneak up on us. It won't be tomorrow, where we're like "Netflix, Make me a Batman Movie starring me." It'll be this gradual rollout of stuff that only kinda half works-- until all the sudden, it does-- but it isn't that shocking. I was thinking about that the other day when I told my watch to set a reminder that instantly showed up on my calendar. Then, hopping back to the first time I tried voice dictation in...like, Windows 98? I mean...that did NOT work at all. Even when we first got Siri/Cortana/Alexia-- constant complaints on how "dumb it was." No one complains anymore...but no one marvels at it either!
@@TheoreticallyMedia You're telling me. I used DragonSpeak, and it was brutal. Now I can just Windows+H and instantly voicetype in any program. All the Home Hubs are pretty dumb now compared with Chat GPT and Bard, which can answer questions directly instead of "I found this web site," and it's only been a few years since they were introduced. I, for one, welcome our future AI overlords.
I said the same thing but i imagine prompting it to recreate any movie you want with a hilarious and random ending that cuts the plot short right in the middle of the film or even 5 minutes in.
the reason the footage of the purse and cup is "wonky", is because they are trying to make a map of the objects, getting all the different angles, etc. It's pretty standard to move the camera like this when "scanning" something.
My mind is spinning uncontrollably, lol. I am one that continuously brainstorms 24/7, always thinking of ideas, stories, etc. Now, with this technology my mind will def melt in the near future - You'll find me at the nearest asylum. But seriously, this is all happening fast - and with tech like this hitting the streets we will just see an increase in speed with new ai tech. Adobe has def went all in with AI in recent months and they seem to be traveling faster than most right now.
I think they’re on a bit of a buying frenzy. I’m pretty sure somewhere in the archives of the channel, the video Inpainting was in paper format (I’ll have to dig around for that)- Adobe had that coin purse to buy their way to the top spot- and to be honest, who else could/should it be? On the plus side, it’ll be good to have all these tools under one roof, Adobe has always been good about interplay between their products. But yeah, these are INSANE times!
Wow. This is doing a better job faster than me using planar tracking in after effects and projecting the photoshop paintout. It would take a lot of effort to extract and match the lighting and movement in a believable way. So many hours of pixel-fucking. Now it's just doing it in minutes with just a few clicks. Quite impressive.
It’s pretty nuts. And the thing I keep saying: this is the bad version. It only gets better from here. I’ll say on the illustrator front: the demo made the gens look super fast, that was actually NOT the case in my real world time. I mean, it was like, 50 seconds. So, y’know; still way faster than manually doing it…haha
They will include it now with their pay to use software service because they need their users to beta test it then when it's developed into a new product they will lock it behind an option or paywall. Adobe and Autodesk can both take a hike I wouldn't give them a dollar.
So, I had a pal that worked for World of Warcraft at the hight of their popularly. I think it was something like 12 million users paying at $12/mo, 12 million x 12. A month. Adobe has a smaller user base, but a higher cost…so, yeah. That’s a lot of money.
Better content? Just another tool, still needs the imagination and direction from someone to create something. They probably thought art was done with when the camera obscura found its way into art.
Oh, I’m sure it will justify their $2 increase to the various plans. Nothing with Adobe is ever free. At least now they separate out the beta versions, instead of just releasing broken tools that we have to deal with….so, thanks?
I see a lot of UA-camrs claiming that Adobe is "stunning the world" with their recent release, but it's barely just incrementally improved over past technologies. EDIT: I mean, I guess it's improvement enough over the current state of the art for commercial tools.
To be fair: I haven’t been wow’d by Firefly. If you watch my last video, I think that’s pretty clear. But: the stuff that was announced here is pretty epic. The dress? That’s something we didn’t see coming. And while video Inpainting and Nerf/splatting isn’t new, incorporating it into the Adobe line is basically a straight line to a professional workflow. I mean, we’re all sort of “in it” and I think that makes it easy to forget that the majority of the world has no idea what’s happening in our little corner of the room. For better or worse, Adobe just put it all on a stage.
I looked it up, in the beginning, you'll get so many credits but when that has been used up, you have to pay for it as a standalone app. No idea how much that will be.
That Illustrator 3-D function looks like a simple extrusion. Notice how the chimney spans the full depth of the house. I can see it saving some time, but there would still be significant editing required, so I don't know that it's a game changer yet.
I think it’s great for doing g little 2.5d animations. Maybe not world changing, but really cool. It does make me wonder if full 3d isn’t far off. Personally I think we’re a few months (or maybe weeks) from seeing really amazing text to 3d.
Nothing Adobe could ever do would make my jaw drop. Well maybe one thing, stop with the subscription based model and get your fingers out of my bank account every month.
I honestly don't understand this weird obsession with sterilizing the world around people in images and video. Obviously, fixing things like mics in shot or what have you is useful, and actually helps those managing continuity on shoots actually do more than just say "hey we need spend a bunch of money to reshoot this", but focusing so much of this on how it can be used to make it look like you were in this strange liminal space devoid of other life is... odd to me.
That's a really good point. I don't know, maybe something to do with a collective subconscious realization that we never get a chance to be "alone" anymore? Like-- we sort of desire some feeling of space? It's a really interesting rabbit hole you've got there...haha, not sure how far into it I want to delve!
Haha, totally accurate. It’s at least 4 versions before we get to something that works. And generally, by that time they also break a tool that we all constantly use!
Yeah, I hope not. But I can see it. I don’t think they ever figured out what to do with Miximo to begin with. The Poseable pitch was probably something like “hey, remember that thing we have in the closet from a few years back? I think we can use it!” Or, they build Poseable and just kind of forget about Mixamo. I’ve seen that happen with them too. Like, it just sits there like a forgotten toy. But, at least we can still play with it!
At some point! The AI showcase didn’t really perform the way I was hoping it would, but I’m thinking about starting a second channel to focus on community films! Stay tuned!
Wonder what they'll discontinue next. Higher costs, fewer features, stagnant development on the apps that faithful users have paid for for years. Burning through credits while AI generates stuff you can't use. Subscriptions and digital delivery killed improvement and innovation. And deadlines. Great for shareholders, I guess.
Yeah, I’ll say that I really despise that whole credit system. There isn’t much worse than trying to generate something while keeping an eye on a ticking clock. Oh, but I’m sure a higher paid tier of unlimited is in the pipeline…
2:43 "You can see where it is....the color of the trees..." To be fair, generally speaking (especially in this day and age), on horizon shots (or nearly horizon shots), items in the foreground appear darker than in the background, don't they? Did it take this into account or was it happenstance?
I'll have to go back and look, but wasn't it a lighter hue? The thing that I'm wondering is if: Like Gen-Fill, it needed a larger sample size to draw from-- Those joggers were pretty small in the frame. That said, I still say that no one would ever notice the difference anyhow. Well, maybe unless you were one of the joggers!! "Mitch, I could SWORN we were jogging past that video shoot, right?" "Dude....look at the trees....what is happening here?!"
Call me when they have an AI robot who can look and act exactly like me and go do my job. Just so long as he can't come back and replace me at home, too. OMG. What have I done!????
After being underwhelmed by Firefly, I have to say, this looks immense. The MAX stuff, especially the mapping (walking behind the coffee cup) is a game changer. Literally WOW! Midjourney need to get 3d out and do something special with it FAST, or they're about to get left behind.
I was (and have been) pretty underwhelmed by Firefly as well. But that’s ok, if Adobe has the rest of this on the horizon! And I should say, I don’t mind the Firefly model in Gen-Fill, it has actually done pretty well for me there, but whole image generation is just not doing it for me.
i think adobe is just being careful at the moment, but eventually they will crush everyone in the ai space like every big corpo. smaller ai companies are going to have to find a specific niche
Yes Firefly was underwhelming but I think you need to put it in context. Adobe is a large company with a very established user base, that has expectations and deadlines. On top of that there is no doubt a large part of their user base that is actively against generative AI. The comparison to that is the extremely active open source world of generative AI. Comparing the two Firefly was always going to look tame, but I strongly feel in the long run Firefly will do some pretty amazing things as Adobe ramps up, and it will do them in a way that I can use professionally with less trepidation and uncertainty than the current systems.
@@JohnVanderbeck Compete or die. Welcome to the world of business. Who cares what pressures they have? They may well catch up, take over and integrate. In the meantime, cash is pouring into it's competitors.
Ughhhhh, you’re right! The green screen billboards in baseball drive me insane to begin with. And I presume the MLB will be the first to adopt this, as they seem intent on doing everything they can to destroy baseball.
@@TheoreticallyMedia Definitely. Plus since batters and pitchers spend so much time just standing there on screen it will be easier for the technology to keep up. (Unless it's Elly De La Cruz)
While as an amateur I love this, I also feel like this is such a slap in the face for people who have put years into learning how to edit stuff like this, all to be rewarded with a 1-click solution
I get your point-- but I also tend to think that the majority of people using this will still be those people who have put years in. If you're looking for an "easy" button, there are much better solutions than Adobe products, which-- no matter how easy they are-- still have a pretty steep learning curve. Like, I think once AI hits After Effects? It's still going to be an intimidating program to learn on Day 1. If anything, I just think that AI in Adobe offers some quicker workflows, but you still have to know what you're doing. Take that Scene Change Example with the guy in the Jungle Temple-- Yeah, it "worked"-- but it wasn't that impressive, because it still needed to be lit correctly-- and needed a color pass...and, a few hundred other things. But that's my point: None of this is a "one button" solution.
I mean. If you watch my video on Firefly 2 (right before this one), I think the marketing overhyped the new one as well. …but, like the scorpion on the back of the elephant, we can’t get mad at marketing. It is what they do.
I mean, yes and no. We've been able to do things like this for quite some time-- it just cost a LOT of time and money. I get what you're saying though: now that it's cheap and accessible, we'll see a lot more of it.
Oh, which book? If you're into Sci-Fi Noir, I just finished Titanium Noir by Nick Harkaway. It's a fun read, very-- y'know Blade Runner-esque. Sort of more revolves around Longevity rather than AI. Breezy easy read though!
@@TheoreticallyMedia "The Dark Forest," by Cixin Liu (the sequel to "The Three Body Problem). The fabrics also respond to the mood of the wearer. Thanks for the recommendation!
If you watch the Firefly 2 video I did before this, you’ll see that I’m fairly critical of their pricing structure. What they really need is an ala carte menu. Where we can choose PS, PR, AE plus whatever else and pay per app. Not these weird bundles that they choose.
Oh, I didn’t even think about that. Haha, Adobe being Adobe, there’s a good chance it’ll crash during a covert mission. “Private Jones! We are in a night mission! Why is your camo colored beach flamingo?!”
It is such a game changer. If you take a look at the previous video I did on Firefly (the No Hype one) I’ve got a section toward the back that talks about Premiere and some of the other cool video projects they have in the pipeline.
So I guess with Project Primrose, the designs are projected onto the dress in real-time in the video and the dress itself is not one big wearable display. That would be interesting hardware, not interesting AI. Adobe is not a hardware company. However, I had to make my own conclusion about that. So you, and perhaps also Adobe, left out the most important thing: What Project Primrose actually does.
So, from reading the documentation, I think it's actually a material that is sown into the fabric-- so not projection. That said, I totally agree with you: No way Adobe is actually going into production on this. I think this is just a nifty R&D project for them. A "We thought we Could, so We Did" kind of situation. That said, I could see them partnering with someone down the line and licensing the tech out. Some super high end clothing company with a "powered by Adobe" ad campaign. But that's just speculation on my part...
Don’t disagree there, but I think the larger “win” here is that Adobe muscles AI into professional workflows. For better or worse; granted. But at least the tech is normalized.
@@TheoreticallyMedia It normalized with SD1.4 when wide range of people start using it for Porn. but yeah, i wish for more optimized offline AIs in the future which i'm sure we won't get any with giant corporation.
Like a thief looking forward to the next heist? You are morally bankrupt, perhaps you should check yourself for psychopaty? Doesnt that sound interesting and explai your little ai thievery excitements and coverage?
Wow, they're almost keeping up with stuff "2 minute papers" has presented a few years ago! Pretty impressive for a lazy-assed company resting on their laurels from 30 years ago
Everything Just Changed!! 😕 oh My!!! Will I be able to live like I used to? How is my life going to change? How will society cope, and keep running the world the same as it used to be? What do I need to do different to cope with this change? 😖 Oh, the horror!
Don't forget, the more Software can do, and the easier, the more and also more realistic fakes can be that are intended to do "bad" and are made by people that are "bad" (momentarely, getting overwhelmed by trauma, anxiety "not a good person") (way more complicated then written here) Also: we are all at fault for "bad" people, we all can change it, and hopefully we all are on the way doing it.
Haha. I actually broke a cardinal rule of mine, in that I updated to the latest OS to run these new features. I generally like to wait at least 6 months. And that does for any OS, Thus far, things seem…mostly stable? Although some plugins on the music side are a little sluggish. That’s pretty common for virtual instruments though.
Technology being used for this, and not all being pooled into automating the mining of the resources, is why humanity is going to fail at this and go extinct. You need to be responsible and you're just not being.
Onestly nothing impressive in the creative side, only some utilities tools that can eventually speed up some workflow. Is more for prople that need to produce fast and cheap than really creative people.
Granted. But this year’s tech demo is next year’s product. Of these, I think most will go to product. Maybe not the Dress/fabric thing, since that’s a WHOLE other product world that Adobe shouldn’t enter. But I can see them partnering with like, Supreme to make a (stupidly overpriced) one off. But the other stuff is already right on the cusp of product. Video Inpainting is a must for them, and Scene Change is just Adobe Branded NERFs/GSplats. I think we’ll see most of this at next year’s Max, but…it’ll also be late, in that those of us in the space will have already seen it and used it.
@@TheoreticallyMedia Yeah, I don't think they can afford to not release most of that stuff, considering all the competition out there. Even the DubDubDub is what ElevenLabs just released and neither is doing the mouth movements that HeyGen is.
I always thought the real areas where this kind of thing would shine is in giant scenarios or size morphs like this ❤❤❤❤❤❤ We could have whole adventure series with big/small villains and heroes etc.❤❤❤❤
I had a whole pitch about that once. Basically “it’s a small world” but in reverse: everyone in the world shrinks down to Smurf size. And what would happen then? It was back in that era of Lost and Heroes- so I thought it was a good hook. But, like Lost and Heroes, I couldn’t figure out what the actual reason for it happening was!
@@TheoreticallyMedia Ya, when I was a tiny child 🤔 there was a TV series “land of the giants” where the premise was an alien planet with giant people and little people. There’s Ginormica in Pixar’s stuff. But a series with adventures on a planet of giants was my first introduction at an early age. There’s the “drink me” of Alice in Wonderland, the littles, Thumbelina (who I wished I was as a kid at one point, 😂) and so Many others. But to actually do it right would definitely require CGI/AI. There’s a book by Tabitha King the wife of Stephen King called “Small World” I think, with a diabolical theme of course, considering the source 😂. But would be able to be made into a movie now with the new technology. So there definitely a lot of this kind of theme out there. It definitely touches a deep archetypal realm, perhaps because we spent many millions of years much smaller in our ancestral heritage. Like the tiny furry creatures we used to be in trees during the time of the dinosaurs. Anyway thanks and take care!! Love your channel!! ❤️👍🏻
this is just a modified version of controlnet, which local installers have been using for months. just install your own version of SDXL and use the many model variations and UIs. you'll have MUCH greater creative capacity and no censorship (speaking of censorship, i'm sure you'll delete this). i have the new version of creative suite, and the limits and strangleholds it imposes on users are just slightly less annoying than all the new and wonderful errors i get when trying to do daily tasks with PS.
I don't ever delete comment, just FYI. Well, I should say, I haven't yet-- I'm sure someone at some point will come in and say something REALLY stupid and I'll do it-- but thus far, I haven't. I totally agree with you by the way: Pose Control is pretty much just controlnet-- And Scene Change is NERFs and Gsplats. I have seen Video Inpainting-- In face, an early version of it is in one of my videos. I'm presuming Adobe just bought them. To all that, I'll say: You and I, and many others that are in this space, have seen this tech. But we are a VERY small group of people compared to the vast majority of Adobe users. And, most of those users don't want to mess around with installing SD and messing with Loras. They just want to open PS or AE and work. That's where the gamechanger is. And I think in a lot of ways, creative AI needs Adobe to standardize. The one plus side to all this is that it normalizes GenAI in professional workspaces-- which is a good thing. It's also Adobe....meaning it's also a bad thing. I've got a 20 year love/hate relationship with that company, so I get where you're coming from.
@@TheoreticallyMedia wow. that was refreshing! i'm generally lambasted and booted for saying this kind of thing. - but you're right, we're likely the fringe. happily subscribed to a reasonable content creator :)
Could you imagine if that was the in the presentation? Just, Rorschach walks out and says: "You've got it wrong, I'm not locked in here with you. You're locked in here with me..." And then the livestream goes black.
I kinda wonder! I miss Poser, and I can only presume someone snatched up that licence. One of my favorite eras of computer art was the combo of Poser and Bryce3D!
@@TheoreticallyMedia... And Kai's Goo. WTF was that? Gamification (you had to use tools in certain ways to unlock the next Goo) of really cool tools is a fail. But Krause's fractal imaging software (forget the name) was unrivaled. Still is.
Indeed. I’m surprised they haven’t had one yet. Topaz seems to be going with this bizarre $300 + a subscription price model? I still can’t make heads or tails out of their marketing copy. But I do wonder if that new pricing structure is indicative of a heavy hitter entering the space.
Yeah it is mindblowing. But also why? Does this help to create better world. No. Just a bunch of another toys for people to not think about important things.
I actually do. Think about it on a smaller scale of say, wedding videographers. A lot of these tools are going to be massive timesavers for them. That extra time can either be used to more client work, or Y’know, maybe just spending time with their own families and living life.
100% You can kinda tell in my last video, I was a little underwhelmed. I try not to manufacture hype, so...yeah, I don't know if that reads or not? This one on the other hand: The hype is real for me!
@@TheoreticallyMediathanks for concurring unfortunately brilliant minded idiots think everything is solved with dumb AI they created. I refuse to be subdue by it.
It’s there, kinda? If you check out my Firefly video, I’ve got a section on Premiere. The TL;DW: they have text to storyboard, and then text to animatic (which is video, let’s face it) and that was announced back in April. I think they’re waiting for that tech to get more rock solid before deploying.
@@TheoreticallyMedia all of it. We’re heading into a path where there is no more effort and no art. At this point just make artificial intelligence create everything for you including characters, worlds and other objects. I’ve only used AI twice to try it out and it made me feel dirty. I think I’m going to start labeling everything I make with a big sign that says “AI wasn’t not involved in the making of this project “ hopefully people will still respect real artists and the real effort they put into creating something unique.
The end results of a lot of "fast removes" videos I've seen end up with the subject(s) travelling through a completely abandoned space. It gives me "I am legend" post apocalyptic vibes.
Uhhh. Ok. But always curious: how is this clickbait? Is it the title? People always get bent out of shape when I use the “Everything Just Changed” title, but I do save it for when I genuinely think things did change. Adobe introducing this level of AI on their products is pretty big. Now, if you don’t like that they’re doing it, that’s a whole other thing.
It is a real golden age. Seriously, I wake up every day and think: “what is possibly coming down the pike today? And like, every day: it is something amazing.
Adobe Firefly 2 video is here: ua-cam.com/video/MJXOpdl4r7w/v-deo.html
👋
has anyone addressed the copyright ability of these AI generated images? until the courts settle that I would be wary to produce any kind of product with these programs
Yes, it has been ruled on. Ai generated images are not copyrightable. The next step will be class action lawsuit and demanding restitution from plagiarists. Justice is coming for all the thievery done here by stupid people thinking they can get away with robbing artists. Its gonna be bloody.
All those empty chairs in the Adobe office from developers replaced with AI?
Haha, that’s a good burn. It’s either that or it’s 3am and this dude hasn’t left the office in weeks.
00:27 🎨 Project Primrose creates flexible textiles that display content, allowing patterns to change and even animate, controlled by body movement.
01:22 🎥 Project Fast Fill (Gen fill for video) enables seamless integration of elements into videos with impressive motion tracking and light adaptation.
02:58 🧳 Fast Fill is ideal for subtle enhancements like removing small elements or fixing continuity errors, rather than dramatic changes.
03:12 🌆 Project Scene Change effortlessly combines subjects and backgrounds from different videos, offering stable and impressive compositing abilities.
04:48 📸 Project Scene Change even generates contextual shadows on subjects for addedrealism.
05:15 🎭 Project Posable allows users to pose AI-generated characters and associate props for contextual interactions, offering a simplified 3D character manipulation tool.
07:07 🏠 Adobe Illustrator now includes generative fill, enabling the creation of 3D objects from generated vector images for use in animations.
Need to see it. The Photoshop AI stuff looked amazing in the demos and is crushingly underwhelming as it is, and that is on static images. I can' thelp but feel that these are very, very controlled examples. Look at the items on the table. They are basically custom made with tracking codes to make them easier to track in 3D.
Those “designs” on the cup and bag looked a little suspicious to me as well!
neural filters are trash, not useful at all
"underwhelmed" is the exact emotion i had from the PS generative functions... and if it's bad in PS... then...AE? yeah good luck... it's like the marketers never considered we'd try to use this stuff in real production environments...
@@DamianHanley239 I think it’s a first step. There isn’t really a great pipeline from AI devs to Full Production, so…for better or worse. Adobe is the only company with the muscle to build that bridge.
It’ll be a messy bridge, with lots of potholes, and will collapse at least once…meanwhile we will always pay the toll- but, at least the bridge will be built and the normalization of AI in production can begin.
@@TheoreticallyMedia yeah i mean... i know you're right... it's gonna take time... but the dang marketing they use makes it looks amazing!... i guess that's the function of marketing though :)
Should I go to work today? With "Everything Changed", how will I learn to function in the world again? I need to know, what still works and what doesn't.
You can not show up. If your boss asks where you are, just send them a screenshot of this thumbnail. They'll leave the office as well...and on and on it will go, until....
Well, I guess it'll be a global day off. I think we could all use it.
I'm less worried about Adobe when it comes to having a mental breakdown about AI. For me, it is more about all the angles happening at once. Images, video, 3d, voices, music, LLMs, robots, etc. Consider that GPT-4 was done training before ChatGPT was even made public, so what do they have now? MidJourney said they just finished sourcing their video training data. Gemini is coming in probably less than a month. AI Explained channel was just showing advancements in artificially generated video for training cars and robots, and last video about discoveries of using lots of disparate robot training data gives a better result even than what the original data was for. 2024 is going to be pretty crazy I think.
I'm actually interested to see more of the generate fill in after effects. That was impressive. That would be really handy for any slight or medium changes for video you want to edit.
Unfortunately, the Illustrator 3D effect looks like a basic extrude, not a true object creation.
It is. It’s a very 2.5d animation thing, but still handy. I do think we’ll be seeing some major strides coming out of text to 3d models in the next few months. Or…maybe even weeks…
When AI came out with stable diffusion : NOOO IT IS STEALING ART AND CREATIVITY.
When ADOBE created AI model from Adobe stock contents(provided by millions of individuals) : YEEE, AI IS FUTURE, I LOVE AI, I WILL GIVE MY 1 KIDNEY AS "CREDIT POINTS"
Haha, yeah I’m not at all a fan of the credit system. I talk about that a bit in the “no hype” look at Firefly 2.
I’ll say this to Adobe’s credit: by putting it into industry standard software, we’re on the road to industry standard usage. Which, might be good or bad, but at least it’ll normalize the use of AI, which to be honest is still kind of a fringe technology.
My greater concern is that Adobe becomes THE name for creative AI, and that’s never a good thing either.
Wife told me I was nuts because, I believe, we will be able to ask AI to show as a never before seen movie of our choice using custom parameters... whenever we want. This will happen in my lifetime.
1000% will. The weird part about it is how it'll sneak up on us. It won't be tomorrow, where we're like "Netflix, Make me a Batman Movie starring me." It'll be this gradual rollout of stuff that only kinda half works-- until all the sudden, it does-- but it isn't that shocking.
I was thinking about that the other day when I told my watch to set a reminder that instantly showed up on my calendar. Then, hopping back to the first time I tried voice dictation in...like, Windows 98? I mean...that did NOT work at all. Even when we first got Siri/Cortana/Alexia-- constant complaints on how "dumb it was."
No one complains anymore...but no one marvels at it either!
I said the same thing and that I would be staring in the film.
@@TheoreticallyMedia You're telling me. I used DragonSpeak, and it was brutal. Now I can just Windows+H and instantly voicetype in any program.
All the Home Hubs are pretty dumb now compared with Chat GPT and Bard, which can answer questions directly instead of "I found this web site," and it's only been a few years since they were introduced.
I, for one, welcome our future AI overlords.
I said the same thing but i imagine prompting it to recreate any movie you want with a hilarious and random ending that cuts the plot short right in the middle of the film or even 5 minutes in.
In today's world, we should be able to figure out whose thinking ability is limited.
the reason the footage of the purse and cup is "wonky", is because they are trying to make a map of the objects, getting all the different angles, etc. It's pretty standard to move the camera like this when "scanning" something.
Yup, although is it just me, or did they also speed that video up? It looked time ramped to me.
My mind is spinning uncontrollably, lol. I am one that continuously brainstorms 24/7, always thinking of ideas, stories, etc. Now, with this technology my mind will def melt in the near future - You'll find me at the nearest asylum. But seriously, this is all happening fast - and with tech like this hitting the streets we will just see an increase in speed with new ai tech. Adobe has def went all in with AI in recent months and they seem to be traveling faster than most right now.
I think they’re on a bit of a buying frenzy. I’m pretty sure somewhere in the archives of the channel, the video Inpainting was in paper format (I’ll have to dig around for that)-
Adobe had that coin purse to buy their way to the top spot- and to be honest, who else could/should it be?
On the plus side, it’ll be good to have all these tools under one roof, Adobe has always been good about interplay between their products.
But yeah, these are INSANE times!
Same bro! I feel like I’m going crazy with ideas 🤯
Wow. This is doing a better job faster than me using planar tracking in after effects and projecting the photoshop paintout. It would take a lot of effort to extract and match the lighting and movement in a believable way. So many hours of pixel-fucking. Now it's just doing it in minutes with just a few clicks. Quite impressive.
It’s pretty nuts. And the thing I keep saying: this is the bad version. It only gets better from here.
I’ll say on the illustrator front: the demo made the gens look super fast, that was actually NOT the case in my real world time.
I mean, it was like, 50 seconds. So, y’know; still way faster than manually doing it…haha
Dude, I hear you. Projecting in AE is always troublesome for me - I end up in Blender which I'm slower but I don't pull my hair out either. haha.
They will include it now with their pay to use software service because they need their users to beta test it then when it's developed into a new product they will lock it behind an option or paywall. Adobe and Autodesk can both take a hike I wouldn't give them a dollar.
Finally I can become the king of FLAVORTOWN
Haha. “A heart attack for you, a clogged artery for you! Exploding cholesterol for you!” Everyone wins in Flavortown!!
Nice to see Adobe has been using our billions in subscription fees for something.
So, I had a pal that worked for World of Warcraft at the hight of their popularly. I think it was something like 12 million users paying at $12/mo,
12 million x 12. A month.
Adobe has a smaller user base, but a higher cost…so, yeah. That’s a lot of money.
its awesome but what does that mean for creative companies job cuts?
Better content? Just another tool, still needs the imagination and direction from someone to create something. They probably thought art was done with when the camera obscura found its way into art.
Yeah sure mind blowing, Adobe will start charging consumers for every feature they have showcased.
Oh, I’m sure it will justify their $2 increase to the various plans.
Nothing with Adobe is ever free.
At least now they separate out the beta versions, instead of just releasing broken tools that we have to deal with….so, thanks?
@@TheoreticallyMedia I agree exactly like what they are doing with generative fill.
I see a lot of UA-camrs claiming that Adobe is "stunning the world" with their recent release, but it's barely just incrementally improved over past technologies. EDIT: I mean, I guess it's improvement enough over the current state of the art for commercial tools.
To be fair: I haven’t been wow’d by Firefly. If you watch my last video, I think that’s pretty clear.
But: the stuff that was announced here is pretty epic. The dress? That’s something we didn’t see coming. And while video Inpainting and Nerf/splatting isn’t new, incorporating it into the Adobe line is basically a straight line to a professional workflow.
I mean, we’re all sort of “in it” and I think that makes it easy to forget that the majority of the world has no idea what’s happening in our little corner of the room.
For better or worse, Adobe just put it all on a stage.
Always learning something new about AI. Thanks for the content
Thanks so much for watching and dropping the comment!
Creative Suite is either going to get a lot more expensive, or it won't include all of these AI tools.
I looked it up, in the beginning, you'll get so many credits but when that has been used up, you have to pay for it as a standalone app. No idea how much that will be.
Basically... "Try before you buy". :)
Whoopee
That Illustrator 3-D function looks like a simple extrusion. Notice how the chimney spans the full depth of the house. I can see it saving some time, but there would still be significant editing required, so I don't know that it's a game changer yet.
I think it’s great for doing g little 2.5d animations. Maybe not world changing, but really cool. It does make me wonder if full 3d isn’t far off.
Personally I think we’re a few months (or maybe weeks) from seeing really amazing text to 3d.
Nothing Adobe could ever do would make my jaw drop. Well maybe one thing, stop with the subscription based model and get your fingers out of my bank account every month.
I’ve been griping about that since CS6.
At one point, I had one machine that still ran CS6…it was like a little black box of freedom!
I honestly don't understand this weird obsession with sterilizing the world around people in images and video. Obviously, fixing things like mics in shot or what have you is useful, and actually helps those managing continuity on shoots actually do more than just say "hey we need spend a bunch of money to reshoot this", but focusing so much of this on how it can be used to make it look like you were in this strange liminal space devoid of other life is... odd to me.
That's a really good point. I don't know, maybe something to do with a collective subconscious realization that we never get a chance to be "alone" anymore?
Like-- we sort of desire some feeling of space?
It's a really interesting rabbit hole you've got there...haha, not sure how far into it I want to delve!
Adobe cherry-picks the F out of their demos. Everything they've shown over the years never works half as good in practice for normal users. Lol
Haha, totally accurate. It’s at least 4 versions before we get to something that works. And generally, by that time they also break a tool that we all constantly use!
I know this is frightening, but this could be the beginning of the rise of 2D animation
Might have a video on that soon!
"Project Poseable" = kill off Mixamo. Then charge for Project Poseable.
Yeah, I hope not. But I can see it. I don’t think they ever figured out what to do with Miximo to begin with. The Poseable pitch was probably something like “hey, remember that thing we have in the closet from a few years back? I think we can use it!”
Or, they build Poseable and just kind of forget about Mixamo. I’ve seen that happen with them too. Like, it just sits there like a forgotten toy. But, at least we can still play with it!
Thanks! hey is 1945 AI still going to be shared, it means a lot to me that you like it
At some point! The AI showcase didn’t really perform the way I was hoping it would, but I’m thinking about starting a second channel to focus on community films! Stay tuned!
2:27 - you need better taste in women....
Wonder what they'll discontinue next.
Higher costs, fewer features, stagnant development on the apps that faithful users have paid for for years.
Burning through credits while AI generates stuff you can't use.
Subscriptions and digital delivery killed improvement and innovation. And deadlines.
Great for shareholders, I guess.
Yeah, I’ll say that I really despise that whole credit system. There isn’t much worse than trying to generate something while keeping an eye on a ticking clock.
Oh, but I’m sure a higher paid tier of unlimited is in the pipeline…
@@TheoreticallyMedia I wouldn't be surprised - or, if "new features" in Firefly gen 2 will create that tier.
If everything changed why is my bank account still empty?
Oh, I didn’t say it was going to change for the better!
I’ve tried firefly and must say it is shity. It only looks good on selected examples in your adverts
If you look at the video I did before this one (Firefly No Hype), well- I mostly agree with you. It isn’t great at all.
Primrose was the sister of Katniss in the Hunger Games... So it's not coincidental
ahhhh, the odds are in your favor! good catch!
Im so FUCKING excited for fast fill. When does this release in beta?
Not soon enough!!!
2:43 "You can see where it is....the color of the trees..."
To be fair, generally speaking (especially in this day and age), on horizon shots (or nearly horizon shots), items in the foreground appear darker than in the background, don't they? Did it take this into account or was it happenstance?
I'll have to go back and look, but wasn't it a lighter hue? The thing that I'm wondering is if: Like Gen-Fill, it needed a larger sample size to draw from-- Those joggers were pretty small in the frame.
That said, I still say that no one would ever notice the difference anyhow. Well, maybe unless you were one of the joggers!!
"Mitch, I could SWORN we were jogging past that video shoot, right?"
"Dude....look at the trees....what is happening here?!"
@@TheoreticallyMedia lol
Call me when they have an AI robot who can look and act exactly like me and go do my job. Just so long as he can't come back and replace me at home, too. OMG. What have I done!????
Haha. And then because RobotYou is a copy of you, it’ll want its own robot as well!
And on and on it will go!
@@TheoreticallyMedia Maybe we already ARE robots, programmed to believe we are not. Because if we knew the truth, we'd go insane!
After being underwhelmed by Firefly, I have to say, this looks immense. The MAX stuff, especially the mapping (walking behind the coffee cup) is a game changer. Literally WOW! Midjourney need to get 3d out and do something special with it FAST, or they're about to get left behind.
I was (and have been) pretty underwhelmed by Firefly as well. But that’s ok, if Adobe has the rest of this on the horizon!
And I should say, I don’t mind the Firefly model in Gen-Fill, it has actually done pretty well for me there, but whole image generation is just not doing it for me.
i think adobe is just being careful at the moment, but eventually they will crush everyone in the ai space like every big corpo. smaller ai companies are going to have to find a specific niche
Yes Firefly was underwhelming but I think you need to put it in context. Adobe is a large company with a very established user base, that has expectations and deadlines. On top of that there is no doubt a large part of their user base that is actively against generative AI. The comparison to that is the extremely active open source world of generative AI. Comparing the two Firefly was always going to look tame, but I strongly feel in the long run Firefly will do some pretty amazing things as Adobe ramps up, and it will do them in a way that I can use professionally with less trepidation and uncertainty than the current systems.
@@JohnVanderbeck Compete or die. Welcome to the world of business. Who cares what pressures they have? They may well catch up, take over and integrate. In the meantime, cash is pouring into it's competitors.
@@icvideoservices or they will buy the start ups.
Sports uniforms will be billboards changing after each play.
That you can turn off with a monthly subscription.
Ughhhhh, you’re right! The green screen billboards in baseball drive me insane to begin with.
And I presume the MLB will be the first to adopt this, as they seem intent on doing everything they can to destroy baseball.
@@TheoreticallyMedia Definitely.
Plus since batters and pitchers spend so much time just standing there on screen it will be easier for the technology to keep up.
(Unless it's Elly De La Cruz)
While as an amateur I love this, I also feel like this is such a slap in the face for people who have put years into learning how to edit stuff like this, all to be rewarded with a 1-click solution
I get your point-- but I also tend to think that the majority of people using this will still be those people who have put years in. If you're looking for an "easy" button, there are much better solutions than Adobe products, which-- no matter how easy they are-- still have a pretty steep learning curve.
Like, I think once AI hits After Effects? It's still going to be an intimidating program to learn on Day 1.
If anything, I just think that AI in Adobe offers some quicker workflows, but you still have to know what you're doing. Take that Scene Change Example with the guy in the Jungle Temple-- Yeah, it "worked"-- but it wasn't that impressive, because it still needed to be lit correctly-- and needed a color pass...and, a few hundred other things.
But that's my point: None of this is a "one button" solution.
Its Marketing lies, same with firefly 1. The reality was way worse
I mean. If you watch my video on Firefly 2 (right before this one), I think the marketing overhyped the new one as well.
…but, like the scorpion on the back of the elephant, we can’t get mad at marketing. It is what they do.
The power over video manipulation these days is getting, frankly, worrying.
I mean, yes and no. We've been able to do things like this for quite some time-- it just cost a LOT of time and money. I get what you're saying though: now that it's cheap and accessible, we'll see a lot more of it.
@@TheoreticallyMedia yup, misinformation and scams are going to be far more sophisticated and easily performed in the future.
Just a few minutes ago, I was reading a passage in a science fiction novel where people in a futuristic setting wear animated clothing.
Oh, which book? If you're into Sci-Fi Noir, I just finished Titanium Noir by Nick Harkaway. It's a fun read, very-- y'know Blade Runner-esque. Sort of more revolves around Longevity rather than AI. Breezy easy read though!
@@TheoreticallyMedia "The Dark Forest," by Cixin Liu (the sequel to "The Three Body Problem). The fabrics also respond to the mood of the wearer. Thanks for the recommendation!
Did it agree to pay an overpriced subscription fee?
If you watch the Firefly 2 video I did before this, you’ll see that I’m fairly critical of their pricing structure.
What they really need is an ala carte menu. Where we can choose PS, PR, AE plus whatever else and pay per app. Not these weird bundles that they choose.
Futuristic camouflage for soldiers.
Oh, I didn’t even think about that. Haha, Adobe being Adobe, there’s a good chance it’ll crash during a covert mission.
“Private Jones! We are in a night mission! Why is your camo colored beach flamingo?!”
I noticed that you made a reference to Dad's Army, @TheoreticallyMedia. That made me chuckle!
"We don't need no stinking human designers" Seems like a stab in the back to their customer base
Eh, I think we're always going to need designers. Mostly so that bosses can yell at them, and blame them when clients get mad. Sigh...
Really lovely playing on your channel by the way!
:-)@@TheoreticallyMedia
Finally the tools to fix everything in post
Oh, god...you're right. Production will never get anything right again!! This is going to make for some very sloppy directors!
GENERATIVE fill now in video...very impressive Adobe.
Love it.
It is such a game changer. If you take a look at the previous video I did on Firefly (the No Hype one) I’ve got a section toward the back that talks about Premiere and some of the other cool video projects they have in the pipeline.
@TheoreticallyMedia thank u...well check it out.
A game changer for sure. Exciting times for the Media industry ahead. 😁
So I guess with Project Primrose, the designs are projected onto the dress in real-time in the video and the dress itself is not one big wearable display. That would be interesting hardware, not interesting AI. Adobe is not a hardware company. However, I had to make my own conclusion about that. So you, and perhaps also Adobe, left out the most important thing: What Project Primrose actually does.
So, from reading the documentation, I think it's actually a material that is sown into the fabric-- so not projection. That said, I totally agree with you: No way Adobe is actually going into production on this. I think this is just a nifty R&D project for them. A "We thought we Could, so We Did" kind of situation.
That said, I could see them partnering with someone down the line and licensing the tech out. Some super high end clothing company with a "powered by Adobe" ad campaign. But that's just speculation on my part...
You people are easy to impress. it's a paid and censored AI and it's the weakest one out there.
Don’t disagree there, but I think the larger “win” here is that Adobe muscles AI into professional workflows. For better or worse; granted. But at least the tech is normalized.
@@TheoreticallyMedia It normalized with SD1.4 when wide range of people start using it for Porn. but yeah, i wish for more optimized offline AIs in the future which i'm sure we won't get any with giant corporation.
Thanks for the presentation, very impressive how much the AI is moving in media environment
From what I’m hearing, these last few months of the year are going to get even crazier! Super excited!
Like a thief looking forward to the next heist? You are morally bankrupt, perhaps you should check yourself for psychopaty? Doesnt that sound interesting and explai your little ai thievery excitements and coverage?
Wow, they're almost keeping up with stuff "2 minute papers" has presented a few years ago!
Pretty impressive for a lazy-assed company resting on their laurels from 30 years ago
Everything Just Changed!! 😕 oh My!!! Will I be able to live like I used to? How is my life going to change? How will society cope, and keep running the world the same as it used to be? What do I need to do different to cope with this change? 😖 Oh, the horror!
Haha, yeeeeah, I knew I was gonna get some grief on that title! Ehhhh, worth it!
Can’t wait for more artists to lose their jobs.
And pay for it.
Don't forget, the more Software can do, and the easier, the more and also more realistic fakes can be that are intended to do "bad" and are made by people that are "bad" (momentarely, getting overwhelmed by trauma, anxiety "not a good person") (way more complicated then written here)
Also: we are all at fault for "bad" people, we all can change it, and hopefully we all are on the way doing it.
great:)
Thank you!!
WHOA!!! Now this is what I was hoping for in terms of innovation. Thanks for sharing this with us.
100%! Yesterday was…well, it was ok. I’m not the biggest Firefly fan. But today? This is the forward thinking stuff that blows me away!
Meanwhile Apple this year: Updated all our Softwares to work with iPhone 15 Pro 😴
Haha. I actually broke a cardinal rule of mine, in that I updated to the latest OS to run these new features. I generally like to wait at least 6 months. And that does for any OS,
Thus far, things seem…mostly stable? Although some plugins on the music side are a little sluggish. That’s pretty common for virtual instruments though.
Technology being used for this, and not all being pooled into automating the mining of the resources, is why humanity is going to fail at this and go extinct. You need to be responsible and you're just not being.
Amazing! I wonder what you can use it for.
Man, at this point? Anything you can imagine!
I think that's the point we need to be more than just extremely careful considering what I can imagine
Onestly nothing impressive in the creative side, only some utilities tools that can eventually speed up some workflow. Is more for prople that need to produce fast and cheap than really creative people.
"Ai Creative" is the biggest fucking oxymoron I've ever heard.
What does that first one have to do with Adobe? Meaning, unless you make a magic dress, how does this apply to you?
Looks great. Too bad it's Adobe.
Adobe sucks.
Yeah, I’ve got a long running love/hate relationship with Adobe. I totally understand.
@@TheoreticallyMedia :-P I think left the "love"part behind several years ago
My first thought wasn't Katniss's dress, but Rorschach's mask!
Ooooooohhhhh that is AWESOME!
Yeah.... tech demos are just that... tech demos...
Granted. But this year’s tech demo is next year’s product.
Of these, I think most will go to product. Maybe not the Dress/fabric thing, since that’s a WHOLE other product world that Adobe shouldn’t enter. But I can see them partnering with like, Supreme to make a (stupidly overpriced) one off.
But the other stuff is already right on the cusp of product. Video Inpainting is a must for them, and Scene Change is just Adobe Branded NERFs/GSplats.
I think we’ll see most of this at next year’s Max, but…it’ll also be late, in that those of us in the space will have already seen it and used it.
@@TheoreticallyMedia Yeah, I don't think they can afford to not release most of that stuff, considering all the competition out there. Even the DubDubDub is what ElevenLabs just released and neither is doing the mouth movements that HeyGen is.
When Adobe makes an impression.... The world must be upside down -
Haha, well we’ll know if thing have gone completely sideways if you ever get an email that says “Adobe has issued you a refund”
Can your remove that girls ugly hair color and tatoos? That would be golden!
I always thought the real areas where this kind of thing would shine is in giant scenarios or size morphs like this ❤❤❤❤❤❤ We could have whole adventure series with big/small villains and heroes etc.❤❤❤❤
I had a whole pitch about that once. Basically “it’s a small world” but in reverse: everyone in the world shrinks down to Smurf size. And what would happen then?
It was back in that era of Lost and Heroes- so I thought it was a good hook. But, like Lost and Heroes, I couldn’t figure out what the actual reason for it happening was!
@@TheoreticallyMedia Ya, when I was a tiny child 🤔 there was a TV series “land of the giants” where the premise was an alien planet with giant people and little people. There’s Ginormica in Pixar’s stuff. But a series with adventures on a planet of giants was my first introduction at an early age. There’s the “drink me” of Alice in Wonderland, the littles, Thumbelina (who I wished I was as a kid at one point, 😂) and so
Many others. But to actually do it right would definitely require CGI/AI. There’s a book by Tabitha King the wife of Stephen King called “Small World” I think, with a diabolical theme of course, considering the source 😂. But would be able to be made into a movie now with the new technology. So there definitely a lot of this kind of theme out there. It definitely touches a deep archetypal realm, perhaps because we spent many millions of years much smaller in our ancestral heritage. Like the tiny furry creatures we used to be in trees during the time of the dinosaurs. Anyway thanks and take care!! Love your channel!! ❤️👍🏻
Adobe AI sucks. If you think it is good you simply do not know enough about AI.
Firefly still is sooooo bad.
Bad details, humans seem impossible and the resolution is a joke and not usable at all.
this is just a modified version of controlnet, which local installers have been using for months.
just install your own version of SDXL and use the many model variations and UIs. you'll have MUCH greater creative capacity and no censorship (speaking of censorship, i'm sure you'll delete this).
i have the new version of creative suite, and the limits and strangleholds it imposes on users are just slightly less annoying than all the new and wonderful errors i get when trying to do daily tasks with PS.
I don't ever delete comment, just FYI. Well, I should say, I haven't yet-- I'm sure someone at some point will come in and say something REALLY stupid and I'll do it-- but thus far, I haven't.
I totally agree with you by the way: Pose Control is pretty much just controlnet-- And Scene Change is NERFs and Gsplats. I have seen Video Inpainting-- In face, an early version of it is in one of my videos. I'm presuming Adobe just bought them.
To all that, I'll say: You and I, and many others that are in this space, have seen this tech. But we are a VERY small group of people compared to the vast majority of Adobe users. And, most of those users don't want to mess around with installing SD and messing with Loras. They just want to open PS or AE and work. That's where the gamechanger is.
And I think in a lot of ways, creative AI needs Adobe to standardize. The one plus side to all this is that it normalizes GenAI in professional workspaces-- which is a good thing.
It's also Adobe....meaning it's also a bad thing. I've got a 20 year love/hate relationship with that company, so I get where you're coming from.
@@TheoreticallyMedia wow. that was refreshing!
i'm generally lambasted and booted for saying this kind of thing. - but you're right, we're likely the fringe.
happily subscribed to a reasonable content creator :)
rorschach mask!
Could you imagine if that was the in the presentation? Just, Rorschach walks out and says: "You've got it wrong, I'm not locked in here with you. You're locked in here with me..."
And then the livestream goes black.
Is Poseble the old Poser interface?
I kinda wonder! I miss Poser, and I can only presume someone snatched up that licence. One of my favorite eras of computer art was the combo of Poser and Bryce3D!
@@TheoreticallyMedia... And Kai's Goo. WTF was that? Gamification (you had to use tools in certain ways to unlock the next Goo) of really cool tools is a fail. But Krause's fractal imaging software (forget the name) was unrivaled. Still is.
Nothing is real anymore.
Was it ever to begin with?
apparently not. @@TheoreticallyMedia
It seems they also introduced a video upscaller. Topaz may get some real competition soon ;)
Indeed. I’m surprised they haven’t had one yet. Topaz seems to be going with this bizarre $300 + a subscription price model? I still can’t make heads or tails out of their marketing copy. But I do wonder if that new pricing structure is indicative of a heavy hitter entering the space.
@@TheoreticallyMedia yeah, you are right. My thoughts exactly. :)
Jan Brady?
Currently this video is at 90k views and you are the first person to catch that! I’ve been waiting for you!!
Yeah it is mindblowing. But also why? Does this help to create better world. No. Just a bunch of another toys for people to not think about important things.
I actually do. Think about it on a smaller scale of say, wedding videographers. A lot of these tools are going to be massive timesavers for them. That extra time can either be used to more client work, or Y’know, maybe just spending time with their own families and living life.
Thanks!
Oh wow! Thank you so much for that!! Very much appreciated!
Crazy!
We live in a real golden age!
Oh! I thought 'Phast Phil' was the name of the guy in the shot!!!
Imagine running Doom on a dress.
Doom.
On a dress.
This is what was hoped for yesterday! The demos were surreal 🤯
100% You can kinda tell in my last video, I was a little underwhelmed. I try not to manufacture hype, so...yeah, I don't know if that reads or not? This one on the other hand: The hype is real for me!
@@TheoreticallyMediaYes, totally got that vibe! Excited to see how it all develops 👀
Stupid world we live in.
I mean...you aren't wrong.
@@TheoreticallyMediathanks for concurring unfortunately brilliant minded idiots think everything is solved with dumb AI they created. I refuse to be subdue by it.
the news was pretty good, but what about text to video in adobe ?
It’s there, kinda? If you check out my Firefly video, I’ve got a section on Premiere. The TL;DW: they have text to storyboard, and then text to animatic (which is video, let’s face it) and that was announced back in April.
I think they’re waiting for that tech to get more rock solid before deploying.
One question though are any of these tools available yet ?
gen fill in illustrator is incredible
I seriously don’t understand why this isn’t the big news! It’s incredible!
You can now fix the final season of Game of Thrones, haha
I'm not impressed.
Which part? All of it?
@@TheoreticallyMedia all of it. We’re heading into a path where there is no more effort and no art. At this point just make artificial intelligence create everything for you including characters, worlds and other objects. I’ve only used AI twice to try it out and it made me feel dirty. I think I’m going to start labeling everything I make with a big sign that says “AI wasn’t not involved in the making of this project “ hopefully people will still respect real artists and the real effort they put into creating something unique.
The end results of a lot of "fast removes" videos I've seen end up with the subject(s) travelling through a completely abandoned space. It gives me "I am legend" post apocalyptic vibes.
Could a mask be made from the dress fabric?
Apparently it is a mesh that goes in fabric. So, yes. A mask, a couch, a wall tapestry…
The possibilities are kind of mind boggling.
and you just got downvoted and do not recommended for clickbait... what a world we live in!
Uhhh. Ok. But always curious: how is this clickbait? Is it the title? People always get bent out of shape when I use the “Everything Just Changed” title, but I do save it for when I genuinely think things did change.
Adobe introducing this level of AI on their products is pretty big.
Now, if you don’t like that they’re doing it, that’s a whole other thing.
Thanks for the information!!
If everyone can be a graphic artist, no one is.
The only channel I immediately click on and like
Oh man. Thank you so much!
might helped if dude learned how to walk
What a time to be alive
It is a real golden age. Seriously, I wake up every day and think: “what is possibly coming down the pike today?
And like, every day: it is something amazing.
😈😈 I can make cooler memes with this
blah blah blah blah blah blah blah
Your very easily pleased.
VFX artists are gonna be out of business soon
Thanks for this one! 😊
1000%!