Morales: Are you assailing article 26?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 жов 2024
  • Subscribe: / @rappler
    More videos on Rappler: www.rappler.co... Follow Rappler for the latest news in the Philippines and across the globe. Morales: Are you assailing article 26? Follow Rappler for the latest news in the Philippines and around the world.
    Support independent journalism. Help us stay free and independent of political pressure and commercial interests: r3.rappler.com... Follow Rappler for the latest news in the Philippines and around the world.
    Support independent journalism. You can help power our investigative fund by donating to our crowdfunding: donate.rappler...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 28

  • @ttl-timetolaugh3388
    @ttl-timetolaugh3388 3 роки тому +12

    I so love this trial. Ombudsmaa morales is very tough! I so love her. Hehhee. And the all the brilliant mind senators are there.

  • @unosebastian4067
    @unosebastian4067 8 років тому +15

    May u have a long and healthy life ombudsman morales country needed u..

    • @febegrasparil6648
      @febegrasparil6648 6 років тому +1

      this woman is useless..she's looks an idiot in the front of atty.cuevas

  • @junereysuerte2895
    @junereysuerte2895 8 років тому +14

    dapat mapasabatas na ang bill ni sen. Santiago na dapat abogado lang ang pwding tumakbo bilang senador.

  • @nathanclaudio6438
    @nathanclaudio6438 3 роки тому +8

    I feel like Ret. Justice Cuevas is fighting against 3 lawyers at once. But still, he held his own with his arguments that are always in accordance with law. Such a brilliant mind. Rest in peace, Sir.

  • @jhonrexbeautifulcabacang8923
    @jhonrexbeautifulcabacang8923 8 років тому +14

    yung mga ibang senador dito nhihilo na sigurado mlmang wla clng maintndihan khit isa sa mga cnasabi ng mga matatalinong to....

    • @AnRoEppOmilid-Setit
      @AnRoEppOmilid-Setit 3 місяці тому

      In effect, are you telling us that you feel dizzy listening to their discourse kasi wala ka naiintindihan?

  • @nanagermanspitz8020
    @nanagermanspitz8020 9 років тому +11

    Brilliant Cuevas! Para syang si Yoda ng Star Wars full of wisdom and intelligence.

  • @alipunga7091
    @alipunga7091 2 роки тому +3

    Hearing these legal luminaries in a debate is exciting

  • @jemichsuma7973
    @jemichsuma7973 Рік тому +1

    grabe ang gagaling

  • @ianhorldguevarra8171
    @ianhorldguevarra8171 Рік тому +1

    Gusto ko ng mag aral ng Law,,as in Lawlessness shaerot

  • @boyhorca3032
    @boyhorca3032 5 років тому +5

    Ngaun ko lang napagtanto na bias si enrile

    • @ambay111664
      @ambay111664 5 років тому +1

      Its clearly shows the bias of the proceedings...

    • @bayankongmahal7153
      @bayankongmahal7153 Рік тому

      ​@@ambay111664pano po ang tagong yaman ni cj ccorona na di nya dineclare kahit dapat ideclare nya?

  • @aaron1983
    @aaron1983 12 років тому +2

    1:00 she has not made any findings but she definintely has formed her personal findings (she explicitly answered it to that effect when asked by Cuevas why she thought it was her opinion to have omitted mentioning the US$10M in that confidential letter she sent the chief justic).

  • @ttl-timetolaugh3388
    @ttl-timetolaugh3388 3 роки тому +2

    If the report from amlc is not accurate, then go after amlc. Not pin it to the ombudsman.

  • @ceciliabushimata8874
    @ceciliabushimata8874 7 років тому +1

    Talaga naman bais ka ka moralis bakit trellianis Ang pinapagingan mo moralis at ISA PA marami makasu nakapinden ngbmga delawan bakit Wala nakasuhan ha ambusman konwala kayo pinapanigan hnde kayo patas sabatas

  • @mathtalinohelper9016
    @mathtalinohelper9016 6 років тому +4

    I am very disappointed on how this old witness deliver her opinion or answer, she is arguing already with the defense lawyer while Enrile seemed to agree with her. Enrile has no knowledge about the law so you better go and plant a potatoes in the mountain. And to Atty. Serafin Cuevas keep your head high and your hopes too. Thank you.

    • @recklessabandon2322
      @recklessabandon2322 2 роки тому +4

      JPE is a lawyer and the witness you're calling is a former Associate Justice of the Court of Appeals and later the Supreme Court beforr she became an Ombudsman.

  • @litodagale4007
    @litodagale4007 10 років тому +3

    Cuevas stop argument you don't know what you are talking about ??