Discrete Probability Distributions: Example Problems (Binomial, Poisson, Hypergeometric, Geometric)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 6 вер 2024
  • I work through a few probability examples based on some common discrete probability distributions (binomial, Poisson, hypergeometric, geometric -- but not necessarily in this order). I assume that you've been previously introduced to these distributions (although this isn't necessary for the geometric problem, as the probability is easily calculated from basic probability rules). Students sometimes have difficulty determining the appropriate distribution to use, so this video may give some help with the proper thought process.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 142

  • @victorlh8627
    @victorlh8627 8 років тому +207

    This guy just explained an entire chapter on one of my modules in 15mins , compared to my useless prof and teaching assistant who couldn't do it with 3 lectures and 120 pages of notes .
    Hands down . Best . Tutor . Ever .
    Hats off to you Sir .

    • @theskeptic8489
      @theskeptic8489 5 років тому

      lol

    • @theskeptic8489
      @theskeptic8489 5 років тому +6

      They have to stretch the material out so they can keep their jobs. Online educations would destroy Universities.

    • @MSloCvideos
      @MSloCvideos 4 роки тому +2

      What an oversimplified and ignorant worldview.

    • @stephenandrade5584
      @stephenandrade5584 2 роки тому +2

      @@MSloCvideos Sad thing is he's right tho, for some classes (Like this one)

  • @Mauntium
    @Mauntium 9 років тому +88

    Very good video, just like the others, on the playlist! This line made me chuckle though:
    (5:20) "There are 26 successes in the population, the 26 females and 32 failures, the 32 men."

  • @kleemc
    @kleemc 5 років тому +9

    Education needs to be totally revamped. We don't need so many professors giving lectures, one for each subject in every schools in the world. We just need a handful of great teachers creating online content per subject. Instead, we need lots of great coaches and mentors to help individual learners. Learners will watch online lectures at their own pace. Coaches and mentors will work with individual learners to guide them, introduce good learning resources, push them to achieve and most important of all, motivate them. That's the new model of education.

  • @sivasakthi76
    @sivasakthi76 3 роки тому +18

    0:15 Binomial Distribution
    4:32 Hypergeometric Distribution
    7:27 Poisson Distribution
    9:31 Geometric Distribution
    13:02 Does not fit into any of the distribution

  • @nimo2211
    @nimo2211 6 років тому +11

    I've been having so much trouble with these concepts, especially because I am taking summer session and my professor teaches incredibly fast and is barely available for office hours. These videos have been helping me more than my professor in the last couple weeks! Thanks so much!

  • @goodgoyim5309
    @goodgoyim5309 6 років тому +46

    When you have 14:51 minutes before an exam

  • @francoisdutoit8419
    @francoisdutoit8419 10 років тому +20

    Really great videos, you get straight to the point without losing the viewer, well done

  • @amitjain3323
    @amitjain3323 6 років тому +5

    Dear JBStatistics can you put more applied examples like these , it's always good to see real world application of statistics than what we read in books like the ball , coin toss , choosing cards from a deck etc in book. These examples are amazing and the more students get to see these explained and solved by you. The more kids will start loving math, probability and statistics. Hope you keep posting these awesome videos

    • @jbstatistics
      @jbstatistics  6 років тому +3

      Thanks for the feedback and kind words. I try my best to incorporate real-world examples in my problems, and I'll continue to do that when I make new videos in the near future.

  • @michipichu
    @michipichu 4 роки тому +5

    After watching all the previous videos in this series, I got all these answers right. Thanks for great instruction!

  • @sushmitanigam4979
    @sushmitanigam4979 7 років тому +1

    what a lecture. Just superb. whenever feel like revising probability i just watch these lectures and concepts get refreshed. Thanx is just a small word. Hats off professor.

    • @jbstatistics
      @jbstatistics  7 років тому

      I'm glad to be of help. Thanks for the kind words!

  • @Femgeek420
    @Femgeek420 2 роки тому

    I spent 2 days creating a tool to calculate I think...binomial I forget which one specifically. My online college course rushed us through 30 day classes I learned way more from the internet - and videos like this. Thank you for keeping it simple ;)

  • @arbootieoaks
    @arbootieoaks 9 років тому +2

    Been searching youtube looking to help me study for a probability test, pretty glad I've found jb statistics! Thankyou, sir, I like the way you teach, best I've found so far.
    Anybody want to recommend some other youtube channel for maths/stats tutorials? You can never have too much learnin'! (Must be up to this standard or close)

  • @yasserosama3405
    @yasserosama3405 8 років тому +1

    sir when you started with the hyper geometric distributions i laughed so much as i remembered the problem about counting females independently and that would cost you a job :D awesome videos really.. thank you!

  • @dannyhan287
    @dannyhan287 2 роки тому

    man, you're like Khan Academy for statistics. thank you so much for your work. very very helpful

  • @HuzaifaKhan04
    @HuzaifaKhan04 Рік тому

    Hands down, one of the best channels for Probability & Statistics on UA-cam! Finished my entire semester's worth of course content in only a few hours thanks to you.

  • @mohammadpourheydarian5877
    @mohammadpourheydarian5877 8 років тому +3

    good example, good approach, simple realistic example, good learning tool. Thank you.

    • @jbstatistics
      @jbstatistics  8 років тому

      You are very welcome. Thanks for the compliments!

  • @khantimalkangiriya7803
    @khantimalkangiriya7803 Рік тому

    Thanks for the help, sir, really helpful video as i started from 1st video , i understood everything you taught. after 9 years of you uploaded this video it is still the best video on statistic on youtube.

    • @jbstatistics
      @jbstatistics  Рік тому

      Thanks for the kind words! I'm glad to be of help!

  • @leiyin5544
    @leiyin5544 8 років тому +1

    Really hopeful,the best professor I met in my life!

  • @cadeemmusgrove7791
    @cadeemmusgrove7791 8 років тому +1

    may the odds forever be in your favor...you saved my university life with this playlist

    • @jbstatistics
      @jbstatistics  8 років тому

      +Cadeem Musgrove Thanks! I'm glad I could help!

  • @Toni-oy5gu
    @Toni-oy5gu 7 років тому

    When you explain a subject the way you do, I begin to like statistics (bit only a little bit) :).Thank you.

    • @jbstatistics
      @jbstatistics  7 років тому

      Well, I hope I can get to the point where you like it a lot :)

  • @hanskwan4645
    @hanskwan4645 8 років тому

    BIG massive thanks to you JB, I nearly learn my whole first year Stat from your video, please go on and post more
    The way you explain and teach is way better than my professors I reckon
    Once again Cheers mate

  • @prathamrana4779
    @prathamrana4779 8 місяців тому

    everything he speaks is just valuable
    so simple so clear
    thank you😊

  • @erinuhelski8538
    @erinuhelski8538 7 років тому

    Fantastic video! It's hard to find nice and understandable videos like this for stats. Thanks!

  • @mahmoudsaber1829
    @mahmoudsaber1829 4 роки тому

    I am really grateful for finding your channel! thank you so much for your work.

  • @rolandroseramirez2087
    @rolandroseramirez2087 6 років тому

    excellent presentation of formula concepts with real-world examples.

  • @omaimakhan3509
    @omaimakhan3509 3 роки тому +1

    I don't understand how to use calculator for solving the equation

  • @mohammadgamaslazuardi6438
    @mohammadgamaslazuardi6438 4 роки тому

    GG, explaining not just one condition thus make us understand the whole picture

  • @ytzu5055
    @ytzu5055 4 роки тому

    On the first example you would have a success rate for one mission, but the real numbers to consider when designing a system would be the neg binom for failure in order to ensure its reliability over time.
    Given the size of our military, if there were 10k systems used once on 100 missions, that would be a rather high failure rate over the 1m uses, and 7 or 8 components would be much more suitable when it comes to reliability.
    Practicality must be assessed however, so 6 is probably as good as you'll get

  • @alvachan88
    @alvachan88 6 років тому

    this is a little late but just wanna say for 12:56, summing many terms isn't a lot of writing cause the geometric sum is commonly known, so we can use a_1=p and (common ratio)=q.

  • @robdeagan9640
    @robdeagan9640 9 років тому +1

    This Video was awesome, Thanks so much. exactly what I needed, nothing more, nothing less. This was perfect!

  • @ou-xiang
    @ou-xiang Рік тому

    you're the best! you helped me understand everything perfectly in a short time span. I can't thank you enough! 😁

  • @jo_west4871
    @jo_west4871 4 роки тому

    In 10:18, why is that formula used? Why isn't it "The permutations P(18, 1) times P(19, 4) divided by P(37, 5), all divided by 5"? Then we multiply "the number of ways we could choose 1 red spot" with "the number of ways that we could choose 4 other ones". Divide that by all possible cases (P(37, 5)) and we get the possibility of getting one red spot out of five. Divide by five to get the possibility of not having the red spot until the last round. Why am I getting a different answer? What is wrong with my formula, and why is the one used in the video the correct one?

    • @mkkkk1643
      @mkkkk1643 3 роки тому

      it is combination not permuration

  • @schatzi5907
    @schatzi5907 8 років тому +2

    I love your videos, they helped me so much!
    But, at 10:57, I thought chance of failure should be 19/37 since the green slot is an additional slot of failure added to the 18 black slots...correct me if I am wrong!

    • @MasayoMusic
      @MasayoMusic 7 років тому

      I think he made a mistake.

    • @jbstatistics
      @jbstatistics  7 років тому +9

      In that example, the probability of failure is 19/37, as you state, but that is the probability I use in the video. I write the probability of failure as 1-18/37, which is 19/37.

  • @shreyasinha4980
    @shreyasinha4980 3 роки тому

    Thank you for the explanations. They bring a lot of clarity.
    Just had a question:
    Why cant the last example be a hypergeometric distribution?

    • @jbstatistics
      @jbstatistics  3 роки тому +1

      The conditions of a hypergeometric are not satisfied there. For a random variable to have a hypergeometric distribution, we need to be drawing items without replacement from a source that contains a certain number of successes and a certain number of failures. That is not happening in the last example. Don't get trapped into the false line of thinking that if the trials are dependent, then it must be hypergeometric; it simply doesn't work that way. There are many different ways for dependence to arise.

  • @markanthonyoccena7345
    @markanthonyoccena7345 3 роки тому

    thank you, you saved me and my degree

  • @yujingzou1826
    @yujingzou1826 7 років тому

    Thank you so much, Professor!! Your videos have made my summer class a way easier time!:)
    Greetings from McGill!

    • @jbstatistics
      @jbstatistics  7 років тому

      I'm glad to be of help! I'm always happy to help my friends in Montreal!

  • @redberries8039
    @redberries8039 6 років тому

    After the P of just 1 left working was calc to 0.0137
    ..as the P of a single failure is 0.32
    why isn't the P of all 6 failing [ie the last one after the others ] >> 0.32 x 0.0137

  • @davidlejenkins
    @davidlejenkins 7 років тому

    Appreciate the help. It supplemented exactly what I need to know for my final.

  • @davidsanjenis2778
    @davidsanjenis2778 5 місяців тому

    @jbstatistics I am curious about the answer at @12:59. i believe that the P(X>6) = 1 - 0.0183 (the value that was computed at the end). If we have an infinite amount of trials wouldn't we eventually get one red slot? We just won't get it in the first 6 trials but certainly red will come up at some point.

    • @jbstatistics
      @jbstatistics  5 місяців тому

      Yes, and that's partly what the probability I calculate is based on. The question asks for the probability that the **first** time the ball lands in a red slot comes after the 6th spin. That's definitely not a certainty. The probability the first red happens at some point is 1, yes.

  • @fikret8422
    @fikret8422 6 років тому +1

    why the last question can not be for hypergeometric distribution because of dependency??????????????

    • @jbstatistics
      @jbstatistics  6 років тому +2

      Independence happens in only one way. Dependency happens in an infinite number of ways. The hypergeometric distribution is appropriate for one specific type of dependency, where we are choosing x items without replacement from a source containing a certain number of successes and a certain number of failures. That situation is not the case in that example in this video.

    • @Minametias
      @Minametias 5 років тому

      @@jbstatistics That was helpful. Thanks

  • @wannadiaz8807
    @wannadiaz8807 3 роки тому

    What operations used and how did it became 0.0245 before the rounding off?

  • @keldonchase4492
    @keldonchase4492 Рік тому

    Wow, this video cleared up so much; thank you!!!

  • @TheRoxas13th
    @TheRoxas13th 10 років тому +1

    Wow, it help me a lot to recall the distribution. Thanks! :D

    • @jbstatistics
      @jbstatistics  10 років тому +3

      You are very welcome! I'm glad to be of help.

  • @primate3609
    @primate3609 5 років тому

    Does Russian roulette is an hypergeometric distribution problem?

  • @prajwaldankit
    @prajwaldankit 7 років тому

    you sir are a life savior!!!! thank you so much !!

  • @RozArialind
    @RozArialind 10 років тому

    What's the process for the lamda is the poisson one. I understood it, but I can't put it into formula.
    Thanks!!

  • @chriscollins1097
    @chriscollins1097 8 років тому

    how do you calculate the hypergeometric probability mass function by hand?

  • @Kazekage121
    @Kazekage121 8 років тому +1

    Haha that last one definitely caught me, i thought it was binomial and i ended up with 1.121E-6. Good question.

    • @jbstatistics
      @jbstatistics  8 років тому

      +Warren Wilson Thanks! I like that one too!

  • @aakashjaiswal2003
    @aakashjaiswal2003 8 років тому +1

    Your videos are excellent.. To the point!

  • @devonteburns8349
    @devonteburns8349 6 років тому

    I am confused why are we using a different approach to the first one which had the equation?

    • @jbstatistics
      @jbstatistics  6 років тому

      There are a number of examples in this video, and all involve different scenarios and different methods of finding the required probability. Which example are you referring to?

  • @abbyterbio5836
    @abbyterbio5836 5 років тому

    If 5 coins are tossed, what is the probability that all tails come up twice in 5 tosses?

  • @khaledsalah9248
    @khaledsalah9248 2 роки тому

    You are a grade savior :)

  • @ManjinderSinghHanjra
    @ManjinderSinghHanjra 8 років тому

    Your videos are really helpful. Thank you!

  • @Factoryseconds123
    @Factoryseconds123 4 роки тому

    Is there a video on using the binomial tables?

  • @mohammedabdulmuqsith6603
    @mohammedabdulmuqsith6603 4 роки тому +1

    5 years later and still saving our test scores

    • @jbstatistics
      @jbstatistics  4 роки тому +1

      I designed them to be everlasting :)

  • @lohittalasila
    @lohittalasila 9 років тому +2

    An amazing review thanks!

  • @gazzalifahim
    @gazzalifahim 4 роки тому

    This video is Great. 😍😍😍
    But for the very first example (military equipment problem) , why it is not a geometric random variable? I am sorry if I asked a stupid question, but can you please help me?

  • @mehar.hasnain
    @mehar.hasnain 7 років тому

    You made my life easy, Thanks a million.

  • @tuantje
    @tuantje 6 років тому

    Thanks for the helpful videos! I do have a question:
    Shouldn't it be (1-19/37) at 12:38? You have 19 non-reds, right? 18 black + 1 green.

    • @jbstatistics
      @jbstatistics  6 років тому

      No, what I state in the video is correct. Yes, there are 19 non-reds out of the 37 possibilities, and (1-18/37) gives the probability of one of those 19 non-reds occurring.

    • @tuantje
      @tuantje 6 років тому

      Oh, alright, got it! Thanks for answering!

  • @LG-mr7yv
    @LG-mr7yv 8 років тому

    Hi can you please solve this and explain why please I need help:The probability that a new drug prevents infection by a certain flu strain is 40%. What is the probability that the drug will be effective in one out of 5 exposed persons?

  • @rakinzia7573
    @rakinzia7573 7 років тому

    You are awesome......really helped me so much....Why don't you make videos on joint random variable or conditional distribution........I needed those badly ....love from bangladesh :)

    • @jbstatistics
      @jbstatistics  7 років тому +1

      Thanks! I'm glad to be of help. I frequently get requests for videos on joint probability distributions, and they are high on the priority list, but I'm struggling to find time to make them. One of these days.

    • @rakinzia7573
      @rakinzia7573 7 років тому +1

      thanks for the reply... :) you know, you make videos so much up to the point....i have never seen such a wonderful combination of explanation along with a very relevant example.....i got very good grade in mid semester only just watching those videos bt sadly my semester final syllabus werent covered in your videos which include joint random variable......i recommended all of my friends about your videos before probability exam...now after watching ur videos they call you "JB BOSS" :) keep making videos keep saving lives :p

  • @sauvikhalder2624
    @sauvikhalder2624 6 років тому

    Why didn't you use Binomial Distribution in the second example?

    • @jbstatistics
      @jbstatistics  6 років тому

      The trials are not independent there. As people are selected, the probability of getting a man (or woman) changes, depending on what has occurred previously. For example, if the first person selected is male then the probability of getting on a male on the second trial decreases. One of the requirements of a binomial rv is that the trials are independent. I discuss this difference in more detail in my intro to the hypergeometric distribution video.

  • @nopecharon
    @nopecharon Рік тому

    I think you should also add a timestamp at 4:25

  • @LearningToCodeAndDesign
    @LearningToCodeAndDesign Рік тому

    So roulette is a potential geometric distribution? Now that’s interesting.

  • @maanvendrakholiya1166
    @maanvendrakholiya1166 8 років тому

    you are really helpfull for us.very very thank u .

    • @jbstatistics
      @jbstatistics  8 років тому

      +Maanvendra Kholiya You are very welcome!

  • @anooshiravanensafian7860
    @anooshiravanensafian7860 8 років тому

    how can we notice that a trial is independent or not ??? (14:06)

    • @hanskwan4645
      @hanskwan4645 8 років тому

      +Anooshiravan ensafian
      From the last question, the second paragraph is basically saying that Coz Tom is a bit Shaky, his probability to destroy an equipment after he destroyed one will be increased. So since the events aren't independent
      (coz destroying the first eq meaning he is going to have a higher chance to destroy the second eq, so the first "destroy event is related to the second destroy event", therefore, it is not independent events),
      The basic Stat distribution we can use is Hypergeometric, but obviously, the conditions for Tom's situation don't quite fit the Hypergeo distribution. So we need to think of an alternative distribution to deal with it.
      Since the question didn't give us further information about how will the probability change after Tom destroy the first eq, this question is simply can't answer unless further information provided.

    • @hanskwan4645
      @hanskwan4645 8 років тому

      +Anooshiravan ensafian
      To notice a trial is it an independent trial is more like a sense of statistics knowledge rather than a Mathematical skill, although you can provide it is independent or dependent Mathematically, but generally just think of the "events" in the trial, do they affect and related to each other, if they don't, then it is an independent trial.

  • @michellepani5122
    @michellepani5122 3 роки тому

    AWESOME VIDEO

  • @mmaking8664
    @mmaking8664 9 років тому +1

    U R THEEEE BEST!!!!!!

  • @blancay7986
    @blancay7986 9 років тому +2

    thank you!!!

  • @Shumayal
    @Shumayal 10 років тому

    I wonder how does that logic work with a geometric distribution so beautifully... if p(x>6) then x=7,8,9...
    In that case, x = 8 is also possible..so how can we limit ourselves to only 1st 6 trials to be failures when the 7th can also be a failure. That makes sense to me if p(x=7).
    Yes I have seen the mathematical proof but my logic isn't satisfied...

    • @jbstatistics
      @jbstatistics  10 років тому

      Suppose you intend to toss a coin until you get heads once. If the first six tosses are tails, then we know that heads comes at some point after that. (On trial number 7, 8, 9, ...) So P(First 6 trials are failures) = P(X > 6) = (1-p)^6. This implies P(X

    • @Shumayal
      @Shumayal 10 років тому

      I undstand the latter and the former but not the between.
      I quote you "we know that heads come at some point after the 6 tails"
      This is my question.
      So we can be getting 7 tails, 8 tails, 9 tails....too and then heads as there is no upper limit for failure (getting a tail)
      In other words how can we get a 'fixed' constant number for it. P(x>6)=P(x=6)
      X>6 has an increasing number of failures more than 6
      But x=6 we limit ourselves to calculating probability for STRICTLY 6 failures and then a success.
      I understood the complement and the rest.
      I guess I'll have to rote learn this concept as I fail to see the flaw in my logic. :(

    • @Shumayal
      @Shumayal 10 років тому

      In short,
      P(x>6) = q^6 how ?
      There can be more failures than six isn't it sir?

    • @jbstatistics
      @jbstatistics  10 років тому +1

      Ahmad Shumayal
      (1-p)^6 gives the probability that the *first 6 trials are all failures*. Since we are assuming independence between trials, then P(first 6 trials are failures) = P(First trial is a failure)* P(Second trial is a failure)*...*P(Sixth trial is a failure) = (1-p)(1-p)(1-p)(1-p)(1-p)(1-p)=(1-p)^6 (This isn't based on the geometric probability mass function, it's based on probability basics. I just realized that perhaps this is where the confusion arises.)
      So we are left with P(First six trials are failures) = (1-p)^6, which implies P(X>6) = (1-p)^6. I hope this helps!

    • @robdeagan9640
      @robdeagan9640 9 років тому +2

      Ahmad Shumayal I know this is late, and this may not satisfy your query:
      By probabilities the ball will EVENTUALLY land on red. But we know the first 6 are GUARANTEED failures, so we can say that at some eventual point it will land on red, which is 1-p(x

  • @sonujack1
    @sonujack1 6 років тому

    Best explanation

  • @amrshaheen7088
    @amrshaheen7088 2 роки тому

    Organic chemistry tutor ain't got shit on this man

  • @anwar_AlSham
    @anwar_AlSham 7 років тому

    thaaaaaaaaanks alot habebe you are the best

  • @mohammadrezanargesi2439
    @mohammadrezanargesi2439 Рік тому

    You're amazing

  • @syedahmedali7417
    @syedahmedali7417 6 років тому

    you are awesome.... speechless

  • @judeann
    @judeann 5 місяців тому

    I LOVE YOU

  • @govindbhagat7197
    @govindbhagat7197 6 років тому

    Excellent

  • @mattbarett1
    @mattbarett1 5 років тому

    The first question should be p(x=1) because the problem said EXACTLY one, not at least.

    • @jbstatistics
      @jbstatistics  5 років тому

      Which is why I work through the question to find P(X=1). I then move on to another question.

  • @anoniem012
    @anoniem012 5 років тому

    HELAL OLSUN ABI

  • @Violet_roses45
    @Violet_roses45 6 років тому

    Ive watched 5 videos im still confused so much for wanting to pass

  • @ameliagrota394
    @ameliagrota394 7 років тому

    Yo is this GCSE level or not?

    • @jbstatistics
      @jbstatistics  7 років тому +1

      I know very little about the GCSE standards (only what a brief google search tells me), and I haven't tailored the material to any specific international standard. I'm simply trying to teach introductory statistics the way I think is best (pitched at the level of an introductory course for non stats majors, with some of the mathematical underpinnings included).

  • @chowdhurymohammadabdullah2176
    @chowdhurymohammadabdullah2176 3 роки тому

    4:45 ohhh dear :v

  • @torealityAN
    @torealityAN 2 роки тому

    I see that you have never been to Turkey, same people can be in a committee more than once surely if they have multiple roles...

    • @jbstatistics
      @jbstatistics  2 роки тому

      Can a Turkish "committee of 7 people" have fewer than 7 people?

    • @torealityAN
      @torealityAN 2 роки тому

      @@jbstatistics I see what you did there now that you reformulated it I sure doesn't make any sense. It was meant to be a joke anyway. However, tell that to the rectorate in our university who is the head of two other faculties.

    • @jbstatistics
      @jbstatistics  2 роки тому

      @@torealityAN Mine was a joke too :) I understand what you're saying.