I wonder if Vlad is pulling this stunt to boost the weapons industry. Western media has been talking about these weapons moving to the Ukrainian border and now they release this advertisement.
TOS-1A isn't just a flamethrower, blast of it's charges are also creating a shockwave tearing everything inside the fortification apart and reflecting off the building walls hitting from all the directions, targets that got hit are not just scorched but also often torn into pieces.
@@javir1669 The Russians practice combined arms warfare and have quickly adapted their anti-drone tech. Said drone usually gets fired upon and destroyed by another vehicle or weapon before it even gets close. And even if it hits, the whole thing is build on a heavily armored tank chassis. The damage will be minimal.
@@lordemarsh6804 You need to understand this is not conventional Fuel-Air explosive. Against Thermobaric explosion which result in a sharp overpressure spike the armor of the tank will protect only to a certain degree. You can compare it to a heavy bomb detonation near the tank.
The most important thing in this type of weapon is the awareness of the enemy about the possibility of using this weapon against him. Awareness alone is sometimes enough to force the enemy to negotiate and further surrender. Thus, what should sow death often becomes the guarantor of peace. Weapons become evil when they fall into the hands of evil.
The scariest part about that thing is that it can quite literally deny you, you very right to BREATH, if it strikes anywhere near you. As the whole thing ignites it consumes the oxygen on the vicinity. So if it fires near your location and you have not instantly turned into soup, then that is the opposite of lucky.
An incredible war machine indeed. The devastation after a full salvo from several of those MLRS lined up together is just horrifying :X However the many drawbacks this system seems to suffer from make it`s application very narrow. I`m no military expert tho but it`s definitely the impression I`m left with.
Appreciate the black humor here: the name of the system is TOS-1 "Buratino". Buratino is a fictional character, the localized version of Pinocchio, known to be scared of fire.
I have seen one young Ukrainian soldier free of any external injuries, but can breathe and turn all red. Blast wave particularly damage lungs, stomach,intestines and bladders
After seeing bodies after this was deployed i would defo say its one of the most deadly weapons on a modern battlefield...one of these is worth ten artillery, this will kill everything it lands next to regardless to what you do or how fast you run, sucks oxygen out the air killing you instantly and fries your body, why being on a front line in Ukraine sat in a concrete box or a trench is a death sentence, especially now Russia has increased the range of these and has deployed more to the front, artillery kills whoever it lands on/next to where as a TOS-1A will kill everyone in the area and can clear a whole trench thats why Russia just deployed more as a few of these will wipe out hundreds of soldiers at a time.
not anymore, 1a has pretty big range and new one even bigger range, so it didn't have armor because it fire from bigger range that enemy non-artillery weapon have. Also low range because 80% of rocket is warhead.
They won't because it will rapidly increase costs and there's no need either. It's meant to lay indirect fire over a large tract of hostile territory to crush fortifications and neutralize enemy infantry.
This might be a dumb question; but apart from being on a tank platform; how is this different from the similar mobile rocket launcher system on the ZIL / Ural Trucks?
So called “survivability”, even the spot and maintenance vehicles got damaged in an barrage or air attack, the main combat vehicle and loading vehicle can survive, I believe if there is only one pair of the spot and maintenance are still functional, the whole unit with multiple flame throwing and reloading vehicles can keep on slaughtering the enemy.
Nominally, no difference from any other 220mm MLRS launch tube platforms. But since heavy thermobaric warheads are used, the range is reduced to such a point that up-armoring is required. Hence, mount them organ tubes on a tank chassis and call it a day.
@@Nekminute you fucking idiot what about that conventional war in 1991 where the 4th largest military in the world was destroyed ruSSis is not a guerrilla war and they will lose
@@fallometr как с помощью РСЗО уничтожить засевшую вражескую пехоту на 9 этаже которая скрывается в части дома которая противоположна направлению удара РСЗО. Сценарий таков 🇷🇺Спецназ лазером отмечает 9 этаж в многоэтажном жилом массиве, установка РСЗО стоит далеко и даёт залп, ракеты летя на цель вертикально не долетая до земли и первых этажей взрывается на уровне 9-7 этажа подсвеченных лазером, враги уничтожены будут в этом случае, автоматика должна быть для этого а это просто примитивное оружие. Высокие здания, холмы, да даже окопы, мешают стрельбе РСЗО в городских боях от стандартного РСЗО вообще нет никакого толку весь урон РСЗО поглащают здания а пехота двигается туда сюда не стоит на месте, укрываясь за зданиями.
@@alexanderg5736 Дальность выстрела слишком маленькая у ТОС-1, не получится применять в условиях городской высотной застройки в любом случае. Если только близко подъехать и прямой наводкой по окнам дать, но глупо как-то, для этого есть танки и ручные огнемёты.
@@fallometr Да не один танк не предназначен штурмовать город, пробовали уже никакая модель и т.д читал статьи моделировал на компьютере танк всегда поражается в крышу башни (коктейль молотова, рпг, муха да даже крупнокалиберный пулемёт пробивает башню танка)... РСЗО полезнее было бы но нужно 🇷🇺УМНОЕ Многофункциональное оружие приспосабливающееся под любые тяжелые сценарии боя. А они предлогают купить ту же "Катюшу" К ракетам дальность увеличить в разы 50 км - 100 км хорошо было бы Ракеты с ГСМ Ракеты с дымовым зарядом (не летальные) Ракеты со (светошумовым зарядом) Ракеты со встроенным безпилотником внутри Ракеты с ЭМИ зарядом (есть у них такие на вооружении) Ракеты имеющие функционал ПВО в РСЗО неужели нельзя додумать.
@@alexanderg5736 много видов ракет это хорошо конечно, но где ты их возьмёшь? Они же огромные, эти нурсы, один полный боекомплект для одной боевой машины целый грузовик займёт, а ты хочешь десять видов и чтоб все под рукой на фронте. Чем больше дальность, тем меньше взрывчатки доставит снаряд и тем дороже он обходится, математика простая. У наших "Ураганов" того же калибра шире выбор боеприпасов и дальность больше, но у них противоположная проблема - они неспособны поражать цели вблизи, как раз на тех дистанциях, где работают Солнцепёки. Одна система дополняет другую, всё логично.
@@RR-us2kp That would merely be just assumptions. There aren't that many TOS-1As so it's easier for them to fully train crews for that, it's barely used since it's an NBC unit, not an artillery category. The explosion caused by the thermobaric rounds used by these can suck out all the air from the designated area, extremely lethal without even penetrating anything.
@@blackmagnetica8714 it is definitely lethal. But it's very close range for rocket artillery type weapon. So I'm not sure why they chose this type of vehicle. I mean after it fires a full salvo, it has no other means of engaging the enemy. So effectively toothless. On the other hand it's on a tank chassis. So supply and ammunition vehicles can't operate along with it because they don't have similar cross country mobility to keep up.
No enemy can survive it- yeah that goes double for the unit that abandons the things and runs away at the first shells that land within sight of their positions. 💥💥🤣😅😳😂
Another clueless idiot that gets it's information from the western lame stream media. Javelin has been a complete failure, as has most of the equipment sent to Ukraine.
Russia can never win a conventional war against unified forces of US and its allies . Only option for Russia is to go Nuclear .. otherwise it will suffer the same fate as Iraq , Libya ...
Why do russians like that crappy(!) "Multicam" so much ? You got much more, much better camo patterns .. Every "Multi" Enviroment Pattern is crap - your idea with two sided suits is much better Mulitcam is like a sign of Imperrialism. That 30 Min Reload time is hardcore tooo slow - why not make the complete upper module changeable - like have 3 or 4 ready upper module ready on a truck with a crane, reload them somewhere save...
Yes, i have always wanted to buy one of these
I wonder if Vlad is pulling this stunt to boost the weapons industry. Western media has been talking about these weapons moving to the Ukrainian border and now they release this advertisement.
@@bixnood7273 they used it in Ukraine 2014
@@00-Dima when
@@adamsmith2944 when they where defending Donetsk airport
@@00-Dima oh I vaguely might remember, but that was super brief. I only remembering hearing rumours about it being used though
TOS-1A isn't just a flamethrower, blast of it's charges are also creating a shockwave tearing everything inside the fortification apart and reflecting off the building walls hitting from all the directions, targets that got hit are not just scorched but also often torn into pieces.
these things are just big targets that get blown up by 1K drones every single day. Crazy how worthless these are in modern warfare.
Und bei TOS 2 dürfte noch schlimmer sein
Isn't good, very easy to destroy with a fpv kamikaze drone 😅
@@javir1669 The Russians practice combined arms warfare and have quickly adapted their anti-drone tech. Said drone usually gets fired upon and destroyed by another vehicle or weapon before it even gets close.
And even if it hits, the whole thing is build on a heavily armored tank chassis. The damage will be minimal.
Thus you get more punch for your investments!!
TOS 1B : suicide drone launcer
TOS 1K : short range low altitude super Manuverable missile defense
It will be nice version
Nice weapon but that Ural truck and military binocular at the end looks amazing.
If only ROSBORONEXPORT added that truck and the binoculars with the TOS as a package deal!
As someone who works in the field of military munitions i just love the Russian thermobaric capability
I really hope Gaijin will put this in war thunder.
For what? Its used against infantry and fortifications
@@lordemarsh6804 I mean, Katyusha is also in the game so why not.
@@lordemarsh6804 You need to understand this is not conventional Fuel-Air explosive.
Against Thermobaric explosion which result in a sharp overpressure spike the armor of the tank will protect only to a certain degree.
You can compare it to a heavy bomb detonation near the tank.
@@lordemarsh6804 Enlisted Modern Event? lol
@@cuqier5889there is also incendiary ammo
I would rather surrender to this gorgeous soldier than face the barrage of Tos
simp
The scary part it the thermobaric warheads, that's gonna leave a mark. Ouch!
dont worry usa submarine game is FAR superior.
The most important thing in this type of weapon is the awareness of the enemy about the possibility of using this weapon against him. Awareness alone is sometimes enough to force the enemy to negotiate and further surrender.
Thus, what should sow death often becomes the guarantor of peace.
Weapons become evil when they fall into the hands of evil.
yes exactly. unless you have a comedian as a president, then you fight till the last man you have
She was happy to precent this weapon of war crime! Wonder what kind of war gas they use?
looks like we're gonna get some nice advertising material soon
Yeah, Russia is currently using TOS 1-A to attack russian partisans on it's own territory (near Belgorod).
Its paving the way forward in Ukraine. 💪💪
not really but nvm
Do these Russian polesmokers not pay any god damn attention to what's actually happening?
Thumbs up for her English, sounds sweet to my ears.
yes! wrap me two of these please! will buy to protect my house from raccoons. hopefully will works well finally.
This was really interesting i have to say! In love in depth looks into these systems!!
Actually awesome weapon..
Everyones rockin multicam nowadays I swear
The scariest part about that thing is that it can quite literally deny you, you very right to BREATH, if it strikes anywhere near you. As the whole thing ignites it consumes the oxygen on the vicinity.
So if it fires near your location and you have not instantly turned into soup, then that is the opposite of lucky.
Indeed. In the words of Ivan Drago - 'Whatever I hit. I destroy' and 'If it dies. It dies'.
この車両はとてもかっこいいです。
ロシア語はわかりませんが、T-90の装甲の上にロケット砲を設置したということかな
Yes. They use the chassis of the T-71 to mount the rocket system and the loading system.
I Like Her Multicam. Looks more promising then American OCP in my opinion.
I don't find it at all puzzling that different weapon systems have different ranges.
I’m saving up for one of these. Someday….
1:55 Does the front plow under the chassis help with stabilization as well?
Getting some use out of these now.
well well this aged like fine milk
@@lazarpejic6415 what do you mean aged you comment on the same day
Ivan shamelessly adopted multicam as well as molle, picatinny rails, m-lok, etc
An incredible war machine indeed. The devastation after a full salvo from several of those MLRS lined up together is just horrifying :X However the many drawbacks this system seems to suffer from make it`s application very narrow. I`m no military expert tho but it`s definitely the impression I`m left with.
It’s a tank with a huge bomb on top of it
They provide very good fire power against usa in ukraine😎 burning everything to ashes.
@@mrdeadpool8656USA in Ukraine? Ok sure.
@@mrdeadpool8656lol Russians have lost almost half of these this month alone
Each nut has its own key, and we have a lot of keys.
Appreciate the black humor here: the name of the system is TOS-1 "Buratino". Buratino is a fictional character, the localized version of Pinocchio, known to be scared of fire.
I have seen one young Ukrainian soldier free of any external injuries, but can breathe and turn all red. Blast wave particularly damage lungs, stomach,intestines and bladders
Please send me one launcher- fully armed and ready to go. I need to adjust the appearance of our local Democrat Headquarters.
WOW!!! WHAT A DEVASTATING WEAPON.
Manual thermobaric flamethrower bumblebee👍👍👍
Its not a flamethrower.
Its a armored katjusha.
👍👍👍❤️❤️❤️
Catapult battle mech’s great great great great great great great grand father right here
what's the point of the loader.. if its being carried on the same tank platform and carries the same amount of payload why not get a second launcher.
bond girl!
Did you guys use the sound effects from Call of Duty: World at War for this video?
After seeing bodies after this was deployed i would defo say its one of the most deadly weapons on a modern battlefield...one of these is worth ten artillery, this will kill everything it lands next to regardless to what you do or how fast you run, sucks oxygen out the air killing you instantly and fries your body, why being on a front line in Ukraine sat in a concrete box or a trench is a death sentence, especially now Russia has increased the range of these and has deployed more to the front, artillery kills whoever it lands on/next to where as a TOS-1A will kill everyone in the area and can clear a whole trench thats why Russia just deployed more as a few of these will wipe out hundreds of soldiers at a time.
😂 very effective and okrainian army has no chance against this type of weaponZ
Lol, yet $300 drones with $100 rpg rocket heads are rendering them useless 😂
@@calokraine5901except for drones, Excalibur precision artillery and HIMARS. Outside of that it's pretty damn good.
👍👍👍
Loved and subbed this channel right away. Russian equipment doesn't change drastically because it works and last. God bless
We may or may not be seeing this in live fire soon. Nice racks though, and either way, I would not want to be TOSsed
The only thing I don't like about this weapon is its short firing range.
not anymore, 1a has pretty big range and new one even bigger range, so it didn't have armor because it fire from bigger range that enemy non-artillery weapon have.
Also low range because 80% of rocket is warhead.
😍🇷🇺💪
kaygees is kilogrems in inglish. Similar is TOS-1, TOS-2, Shmel, and various other parachute thermobaric bombs.
🤔auf Weihnachten vielleicht!😅
SUPER
Класс!!!
just wait when the tractors come :D
Бу! парара рам пам па па. Ра! парара рам пам па па. Ти! парара рам пам па па. Но! Бу Ра Ти Но!
make it for targetting Aircraft too.
How to order one of these?
how do you get in there
inst of the narrator in a studio, please
Do you take Amex?
Please make a guided version😜
They won't because it will rapidly increase costs and there's no need either. It's meant to lay indirect fire over a large tract of hostile territory to crush fortifications and neutralize enemy infantry.
Wow that awesome..Sell it to malaysian ,our country need it to protect our long border .
This might be a dumb question; but apart from being on a tank platform; how is this different from the similar mobile rocket launcher system on the ZIL / Ural Trucks?
Thermobaric vs non thermobaric
Probably because this thing might be used for semi-direct fire ?
@@TheDrono The Rocket is Termobaric. The launcher is Just a launcher.
So called “survivability”, even the spot and maintenance vehicles got damaged in an barrage or air attack, the main combat vehicle and loading vehicle can survive, I believe if there is only one pair of the spot and maintenance are still functional, the whole unit with multiple flame throwing and reloading vehicles can keep on slaughtering the enemy.
Nominally, no difference from any other 220mm MLRS launch tube platforms. But since heavy thermobaric warheads are used, the range is reduced to such a point that up-armoring is required. Hence, mount them organ tubes on a tank chassis and call it a day.
Average Russian Christmas present 💀
И у нас таких до х..я. 😊
I want to buy one
I like my NATO crispy
Nice target for nato aircraft
@@00-Dima s400-500 will take care of that
@@Nekminute tomahawks and drones will take care of those ruSSia will always lose America rules the sky and sea thats what is most important
@@00-Dima they have lost every war since vietnam, you are delusional
@@Nekminute you fucking idiot what about that conventional war in 1991 where the 4th largest military in the world was destroyed ruSSis is not a guerrilla war and they will lose
Bringen Sie ein Bericht über TOS 2 bitte, Danke an Kanal,,,
They are working very well in Ukraine
I want one.
I want to buy one.
TOS makes toast
Good morning sirs please quote best price FOB Kharkiv
Just like most Russian stuff, doesn't really work as well as it does on the box..
😯
Ракеты немогут падать на цель вертикально ??? И взрываться над целью на высоте 5 метров ???
Какой смысл, взрыв же объёмный. Это у обычных боеприпасов серьёзная часть поражающего воздействия уходит "в землю", а тут равномерно распределяется.
@@fallometr как с помощью РСЗО уничтожить засевшую вражескую пехоту на 9 этаже которая скрывается в части дома которая противоположна направлению удара РСЗО.
Сценарий таков 🇷🇺Спецназ лазером отмечает 9 этаж в многоэтажном жилом массиве, установка РСЗО стоит далеко и даёт залп, ракеты летя на цель вертикально не долетая до земли и первых этажей взрывается на уровне 9-7 этажа подсвеченных лазером, враги уничтожены будут в этом случае, автоматика должна быть для этого а это просто примитивное оружие. Высокие здания, холмы, да даже окопы, мешают стрельбе РСЗО в городских боях от стандартного РСЗО вообще нет никакого толку весь урон РСЗО поглащают здания а пехота двигается туда сюда не стоит на месте, укрываясь за зданиями.
@@alexanderg5736 Дальность выстрела слишком маленькая у ТОС-1, не получится применять в условиях городской высотной застройки в любом случае. Если только близко подъехать и прямой наводкой по окнам дать, но глупо как-то, для этого есть танки и ручные огнемёты.
@@fallometr Да не один танк не предназначен штурмовать город, пробовали уже никакая модель и т.д читал статьи моделировал на компьютере танк всегда поражается в крышу башни (коктейль молотова, рпг, муха да даже крупнокалиберный пулемёт пробивает башню танка)...
РСЗО полезнее было бы но нужно 🇷🇺УМНОЕ Многофункциональное оружие приспосабливающееся под любые тяжелые сценарии боя.
А они предлогают купить ту же "Катюшу"
К ракетам дальность увеличить в разы 50 км - 100 км хорошо было бы
Ракеты с ГСМ
Ракеты с дымовым зарядом (не летальные)
Ракеты со (светошумовым зарядом)
Ракеты со встроенным безпилотником внутри
Ракеты с ЭМИ зарядом (есть у них такие на вооружении)
Ракеты имеющие функционал ПВО в РСЗО неужели нельзя додумать.
@@alexanderg5736 много видов ракет это хорошо конечно, но где ты их возьмёшь? Они же огромные, эти нурсы, один полный боекомплект для одной боевой машины целый грузовик займёт, а ты хочешь десять видов и чтоб все под рукой на фронте. Чем больше дальность, тем меньше взрывчатки доставит снаряд и тем дороже он обходится, математика простая. У наших "Ураганов" того же калибра шире выбор боеприпасов и дальность больше, но у них противоположная проблема - они неспособны поражать цели вблизи, как раз на тех дистанциях, где работают Солнцепёки. Одна система дополняет другую, всё логично.
we have this in algeria
Algorithm.
Putin i want one my birthday gift 👀
I need one of these, it will make an end to the constant barking of my neighbours dog
excelente para incinerar operadores de javelin!!!
Excellent targets for getting blown up by javelins
@@RR-us2kp
this one outranges Javelins
@@blackmagnetica8714 lot of weapons do. But the Russians using them are incompetent
@@RR-us2kp
That would merely be just assumptions. There aren't that many TOS-1As so it's easier for them to fully train crews for that, it's barely used since it's an NBC unit, not an artillery category.
The explosion caused by the thermobaric rounds used by these can suck out all the air from the designated area, extremely lethal without even penetrating anything.
@@blackmagnetica8714 it is definitely lethal. But it's very close range for rocket artillery type weapon.
So I'm not sure why they chose this type of vehicle. I mean after it fires a full salvo, it has no other means of engaging the enemy. So effectively toothless.
On the other hand it's on a tank chassis. So supply and ammunition vehicles can't operate along with it because they don't have similar cross country mobility to keep up.
😘4 channel :)
BUENAS NOCHES EL VIDEO ES MUY LINDO PERO EN ARGENTINA HABLAMOS ESPAÑOL POR FAVOR! TRATEN DE HACER SUBTITULADO EN ESPAÑOL GRACIAS !!!
🇪🇸
Is the girl nice only.
Well within the range of modern ATGMs . Not sure if it can survive against near peer adversaries
It shoots over buildings and trees so just don't use it in wide open fields
Thats one dumbass opinion lol....
@@BloPsy__ this, ya this is not meant for engaging armoured op for, it’s a indirect fire support weapon, not a main line tank xD
Most modern ATGMs have a range of 4km. Plus an APS can be installed on it.
@@qarmatianwarhorse6028 Kornet , Spike will disagree with you
W
Es giebt auch TOS 2 noch stärker als TOS1,,,
Can these be destroyed by a 155mm Paladin?
Ukraine thanks you for the intel
I'm English we have something more Powerful the M270
But you have only 42 m270, and it was made in America.
Weapons no was for female ! Proverbs 31:3."Do not give your strength to women...."
Это русскийх
No enemy can survive it- yeah that goes double for the unit that abandons the things and runs away at the first shells that land within sight of their positions. 💥💥🤣😅😳😂
Is that some kind of a cope attempt?
Destroyed in Ukraine now.😂😂😂
Yes, they are supposed to be very lethal for okrainian soldiers 😂
lol fake multicam is cringe
Javlin will sort that chunk of metal
Another clueless idiot that gets it's information from the western lame stream media. Javelin has been a complete failure, as has most of the equipment sent to Ukraine.
Deadly but outdated for the modern battlefield !! Easy target for drones ..
Drones are easy targets as well.
Not necessarily. It can easily be operate under cover provided by friendly UAVs and manned aerial assets.
Why do you think it will be alone?...lol
Ah, another well-experienced General in the comment section portraying drones as the ultimate weapon and that no countermeasures against drones exist.
Russia can never win a conventional war against unified forces of US and its allies . Only option for Russia is to go Nuclear .. otherwise it will suffer the same fate as Iraq , Libya ...
I hope Ukraine has seen this video. Hehe
Why do russians like that crappy(!) "Multicam" so much ?
You got much more, much better camo patterns ..
Every "Multi" Enviroment Pattern is crap - your idea with two sided suits is much better
Mulitcam is like a sign of Imperrialism.
That 30 Min Reload time is hardcore tooo slow - why not make the complete upper module changeable - like have 3 or 4 ready upper module ready on a truck with a crane,
reload them somewhere save...
Woodland and digital is great and they have their own indigenous patterns.
@@qarmatianwarhorse6028 "they have their own indigenous patterns."
right, what i said..
@@easygroove Ahem, I meant their own multicam patterns specific to the russian environment they operate in.
@@qarmatianwarhorse6028 hahah, ok - sorry .
name a few, please
@@easygroove I'm not quite up to speed with russian uniforms but I did see a "moss" pattern which is unique to russia.