LSAT Logical Reasoning | Quantifier | Inferences from Quantified Statements | Formal Logic PART 1

Inferences from quantified statements on the LSAT. Tips for one of the trickiest concepts in LSAT logical reasoning. All, Most, Some, None, Formal Logic.
Link to part 2: • LSAT Logical Reasoning...
Find these videos helpful? Prep for the LSAT with Kevin Lin, a 180-scoring expert tutor. www.luminatels...
Twitter: / luminatelsat
Facebook: / luminatelsat
LinkedIn: / kevinjameslin

[@madisonhinkle5017]

Hello again! I would just like to say that because of this video I was able to instinctively apply this to a question under timed circumstances and answer it correctly.

[@madisonhinkle5017]

Great content! Explanations are very clear!

[@r.p.8906]

I am struggling with Question 19 from PT 79. If you can explain the answers, I would appreciate it so much. I read the correct one and still can't see why it was correct. Thanks! BTW, I highly recommend your LG courses :-)

[@LuminateLSAT]

Thanks, RP, glad you're finding it useful. Do you mean PT79 #19 from the computer virus game?

[@melkor2024]

Wow. Never failing to inspire. Grouping inferences as transitive and overlap is like demolishing the LSATs way of trying to hide answers. I can see how you and potentially those that implement your method will be able to score highly. This grouping, I see now, is what you mean by effective processes.