Відео

super helpful! unlike any NA question video i have seen. thank you!

A great example of tip #4 is the notorious rattlesnake LR question... this makes total sense now lol #iykyk

TY for explaining how new info could be worked in as long as it is supported by the stimulus :) sorta mbt hybrid

I’m here to reiterate everything everyone has said! I came looking for motivation to keep trying hard SA questions and now I feel equipped to tackle them again tomorrow! ❤

Regarding your last point --that it doesn't help a weaken by stating that scientists don't know how the mechanism could work. What about saying the same, but for a strengthen? Such as scientists claim that it could be true by....? Would something like that be a qualifying answer?

is there a difference between only and only if?

Hi Kevin! Been following your lessons via 7Sage and found you here, love your videos! For example two, would number4 become necessary if it were instead "Anyone who is credibly accused of taking bribes in connection with their job and won't have their decisions viewed as credible by the public should resign"?

Kevin do you have a contact email or number for tutoring? I love your explanations.

I agree with the additional comments you have a natural talent for explaining lessons with clarity and detail I am so happy like everyone else, that I found your videos I will be watching them all before my test in February, and good luck to everyone taking the LSATs this year!!! <3

The last part *connecting necessary assumptions to flaws* at the end really confused me! When is this applicable? How do they overlap and under what conditions? I used to find necessary assumptions by using the same method as finding flaws, and kept getting them mixed until I made an effort to differentiate. But it''s still not clear to me when and why they would hypothetically overlap. Thanks!

Great stuff, Kevin.

You are the only instructor that causes the, "ahh, I get it!" synapses to occur in my brain.

This literally feels like it would be so obvious but this is what I ALWAYS find myself missing. Thank you so much for your help!

my guy!!!! first time placing a face on the legendary voice i've been hearing for the past 7 months.

I like the John Wick example. great stuff. Would you say that with your expertise in LSAT questions, you'd spot this kind of error pretty quickly in a question stem unfamiliar to you?

Never heard of treating it as a necessary assumption 😮

I can't wait for this to click omg

If you live in NOLA, you live in Louisiana. If you don't live in Louisiana, you definitely don't live in NOLA. But not living in NOLA doesn't mean you don't live in Louisiana. You could live in Shreveport (failing the sufficient). Been studying for the LSAT for like 2 years and finally, FINALLY, these have become easy with this one video. Thank you so much!

Just subscribed. I’m taking the LSAT in June and I really need a good score to get into the law school of my dreams. I watched your necessary assumption video and knew I had to watch them all.

Oh he absolutely cooked at 11:27

I have been struggling with SA for so long… this video has been so extremely helpful in forming an understanding of how to strategize for this question type. Many thanks, Kevin!

this video sparked a lightbulb moment. I couldn't crystalize the placement of the "necessary," condition in the conclusion. Thank you

11:19 you said when negating, we should not touch the subject. But why is the word 'every' in the subject negated to some?

Thank you so much. I struggled so much with these types of questions. Your explanation is flawless imo

Hi Kevin! Thanks for this great video. Just a question here... can we conclude that all sufficient assumptions are somehow necessary assumptions as well, but in contrast necessary assumptions are not necessarily a sufficient assumption for an argument?

LOVEEE your videos Kevin! I saw this on a blog and found it helpful: In the context of combining statements containing quantifiers, you can remember the golden rule by thinking of the “4 S Rule”: The Sufficient of the Stronger statement must be Shared, and the conclusion is a “Some” statement. So, in Kevin's example: (a) All pirates have beards. (b) Most pirates love to read. (a) has the stronger quantifier (all), and the sufficient part "pirates" is shared between the two statements; therefore, the conclusion will be a "some" statement. Inference: "Some people who have beards love to read." Note: You can never combine a “most” statement with a “some” statement, and you can never combine two “some” statements.

good

Excellent Video man. very helpful.

I am glad I found this meticulous video just a week before my test. I recognized Kevin from one of the prep courses I am in now. He appears a lot in the syllabus.

this is rlly helpful informaion, i wish things like this are placed on 7sage as well

Great tips

Hi, I know that a few other people have commented on this but I've read those threads and am still confused. Wouldn't "All winged pigs can fly" actually be the narrowest possible assumption that the argument can make (rather than the broader/stronger "anything with wings can fly")? I don't understand why we need to drag other animals into this if we can get from the premise to the conclusion with my narrower assumption.

Very helpful, thank you.

Just got 14 Flaw questions right after watching this video. Thank you

I hope your pillow is cold on both sides <3

Kevin, I'm your biggest fan. This video should be seen by ALL who are trying to grasp Sufficient Assumption questions. Thanks for always making it make sense! PS - you epitomize "manifesting generosity"

This is brilliant! Thank you!!

This was extremely helpful!!!!

I love the umbrella example!

thank you ! This video was very helpful and informative.

Good morning, where can I get the template for the chart?

Best video on this topic i've seen! great way of breaking this down and comparing the two types

This is the video i needed and i take my test today. Wish me luck and thanks for all the videos!! I really appreciate them

very appreciated very smart thank you

Do you recommend if we are intermediate students we take notes for these vids or just treat it like a lecture

I got chills. NA and SA questions were the ones I constantly got wrong and struggled so hard to understand. The way you broke down the concepts and how to diagram literally made my jaw drop. Thank you so much

Psychologically this helps. So it makes it one big section rather than two

Can watching these vids count as studying lol