12 Speed CHAINLINE Explained - 52 vs 55 vs 56.5 mm, Shimano SLX M7100 vs M7120 Cranksets

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 1 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 442

  • @ilyakonrad
    @ilyakonrad 3 місяці тому +4

    You're the go-to resource when it comes to buying shimano stuff. I mean it's often more useful than the official Shimano resources. Thanks a lot!

    • @LoveMTB
      @LoveMTB  3 місяці тому

      Glad to help and thanks for sharing your experience!

  • @tl2038
    @tl2038 8 місяців тому +2

    Thank you for all the useful info. I just order a 8120 crankset and I thought I made a mistake. After watching your video and check the Shimano website manual, I can confidently install the crank. It’s amazing that you included every detail we need, even the spacer direction! Thank you

    • @LoveMTB
      @LoveMTB  8 місяців тому

      Glad to help

  • @newttella1043
    @newttella1043 3 роки тому +68

    Thanks for these Shimano comparisons! These details are so important. The headache of ordering the wrong part is maddening. Bike shops don't always have the most informed staff these days. So you have to know what you want.

    • @tambouyahia8716
      @tambouyahia8716 2 роки тому

      @@LoveMTB hay love mtb the shimano cranks m8130 super boost The thickness of the joints is 4,5mm ?

    • @edritchie270
      @edritchie270 2 роки тому

      I’m trying to run 49mm chain line cranks on a 52mm frame/wheel set and a 3mm offset chainring. Not having any luck very noisy drivetrain. Any ideas? 6mm offset chainring ?

    • @edritchie270
      @edritchie270 2 роки тому

      @@LoveMTB In the taller 2 or 3 gears chain must be rubbing on cassette because of the sever angle in the alignment of the cassette vs chainring. I'm running boost wheel set and trying a 140mm length cranks that are meant for non boost, 49mm chainline. Any ideas as what to try next? Current chainring has a 3mm off set.

    • @jasonesperancilla
      @jasonesperancilla Рік тому

      Hi i tried ti install a deore 6100 crankset on my 2019 specialized chisel but found out that the deore 6100 spindle length is short for my frame, would the deore 6120 spindle length be enough or do i need to get the deore 6130, hope you could help me out.thanks

    • @theymademepickaname1248
      @theymademepickaname1248 Рік тому +1

      Bike shops are useless.

  • @rintrah40
    @rintrah40 2 роки тому +7

    Perfect video at the perfect time for me. I ordered the XT8120 and then realized the chainline difference of 55 than 52 from the 8100. This video has explained what I needed to know and has eased my mind. I'll be installing it this weekend hopefully.

  • @mattd7814
    @mattd7814 3 роки тому +15

    This channel is the best, you always cover all the details I wonder about that no one else seems to cover. I recently purchased the M7100 crankset for my boost frame and was confused between if I should get the M7120 or not. It was confusing that both were listed for boost frames. With the 7100 the 32 tooth is pretty close on my frame but is still good enough to run like that, but for now I’m running a 30T Oneup as my cassette is only 42T. I’m in the easiest 2-3 gears for a lot of my slow technical riding so glad I ended up with the 52mm chainline. Not being able to run an oval or 34T isn’t a big deal for me but this video is very helpful to help people decide between the options.

    • @teemu3370
      @teemu3370 3 роки тому

      Maybe it is possible to get the spacers separately and test it out?
      Also when do we see the ARC-build??? I want one after the frame video....

  • @aLboOGieZ
    @aLboOGieZ 2 роки тому +1

    When dealing with so many standards for components it's easy to get discombobulated and confuzzled. But you my friend are so thorough, and I mean thorough. I come back and realize new things that I missed months ago. Thank you man seriously 🙏🙏🙏

    • @aLboOGieZ
      @aLboOGieZ 2 роки тому

      @@LoveMTB you're welcome btw my exact issue is my bike frame has a chain line of 52mm but like a bone-head I got SLX-M1720 w/ 55mm. Any suggestions?

  • @jduran30
    @jduran30 2 місяці тому +1

    Your video helped me so much, I got a Shimano SLX M7120 crankset & BB installed by my local bike shop and I was doing a mid season cleanup and re-lube when I removed the crankset and both spacers were installed on the drive side, it just didn’t look right I was confused because the spacers didn’t seem to be built to be placed together, after watching your video everything started to make sense, I immediately looked it up in the Shimano manual for some redundancy and was able to confirm it! I guess some local bike shops cannot be trusted, thanks so much!

    • @LoveMTB
      @LoveMTB  2 місяці тому +1

      @@jduran30 glad you got it all sorted out 😊

  • @kenmunozatmmrrailroad6853
    @kenmunozatmmrrailroad6853 11 місяців тому +2

    I’m currently in the middle of a retro build; a 26 inch rigid frame I’m converting from a 3x to a 1x11/12- this was very helpful!

    • @LoveMTB
      @LoveMTB  11 місяців тому +1

      You're welcome! Andf have fun with your build, winter is the season 🙂

    • @LoveMTB
      @LoveMTB  11 місяців тому +1

      Question - since the 26 wheels are smaller have you considered going for the 1x11 GS derailleur and 11-46 cassette? It fits a lot better than the 12 speed. Just a thought

    • @kenmunozatmmrrailroad6853
      @kenmunozatmmrrailroad6853 11 місяців тому

      @@LoveMTB Answer:
      Yes and thanks for asking. Here's complete analysis and my requisite flow chart for Circa 92' Univega w/ unique AMP parallelogram fork:
      1) XTR Thumbshifter a must
      2) Tubeless, conversion? If possible would go along way to keeping me on my existing wheel set and hub. Cane Creek straight pull and they've been great.
      3) Wide range is a must. I pull a BOB trailer at times inclusive of ball end skewer.
      4) End result- An ugly sleeper/Townie/Adventure/ Do whatever ride I can chain lock to a pole and still come back to it.
      5) Very much considering XTR 1x simply to keep wheel set, even if I have to stick with tubes.
      In a perfect world I'd stick with XTR 2x on my existing wheel set converted to tubeless however, the writing is on the wall and all this is moot if product is unsupported into the future; hence urge towards 1x12.
      End game simply: to not leave another frame to the landfill. Repurpose, reuse, refuse disposable culture. Provide work to men in a shop not corporations and offshore manufacture.
      It's rather personal to me. We start the build in the next couple of weeks.
      Any advice would be much appreciated.
      Thank you. You've got a wonderful channel!

  • @NeilSnapePhotography
    @NeilSnapePhotography 3 роки тому +8

    Yes! You made something complicated easy to understand, and very precise.

  • @amol4184
    @amol4184 Рік тому +4

    This channel is equivalent to Sheldon Brown, just in a different format. Such great information!

    • @LoveMTB
      @LoveMTB  Рік тому +1

      Thank you, I am humbled.☺

  • @diegovillacrez8349
    @diegovillacrez8349 Рік тому +2

    Well I'm running 2x11 on my 2010 stumpy with the deore 48.8mm chainline nonboost crankset very smooth shifting. Thanks for this video, I feel like I understand q factor and chainline much better now.

  • @tinshield
    @tinshield 3 роки тому +10

    Great video! My experience with the new Shimano cranks is that they are providing three sizes for quite a few scenarios and, in many cases, the chain lines are not ideal and often push the chain outboard. If you're riding areas are slow and techy and you spend a lot of time in the bigger cogs, it's lousy! There's options to fine tune this though.
    For threaded bottom brackets you can buy a bag of varying width spacers which would allow you to move the chain line a couple millimeters. You can also change out those 3 MM shimano spacers with some wheel manufacturing spacers and stack a different amount on either side to fine tune (e.g. 1mm on one side and 5mm on the other). Both my bikes put the front chain ring dead center on the cassette.

    • @dancing8595
      @dancing8595 2 роки тому

      Curious, do you notice the difference between the spacings in your knees, or pedaling? I like this option, but curious about the spacing not being even. Thanks.

    • @tinshield
      @tinshield 2 роки тому

      @@dancing8595 good question. I had a superboost setup before and I’m more comfortable with the regular boost spacing

  • @SirCrashaLot
    @SirCrashaLot 3 роки тому +22

    Catching up after 10 years of inactivity. Man did the things change. Great info.

    • @teemu3370
      @teemu3370 3 роки тому +1

      Happy hunting!

    • @SirCrashaLot
      @SirCrashaLot 3 роки тому

      @@teemu3370 taks on its own nowadays, but I did manage to score sweet BMC.

    • @alutious
      @alutious 3 роки тому

      wait until the wheel rim will be a gear

    • @pvflyer67
      @pvflyer67 3 роки тому

      IKR! Same here.

  • @ThunderStruckMTB
    @ThunderStruckMTB 3 роки тому +4

    Man, you always hit every single aspect and spec of whatever it is you're reviewing.... always so good. I was a devout Shimano crankset user myself before my Chameleon came with a SRAM DUB crankset, and I'm now a Kool-Aid drinking DUB disciple. I love their BB and the overall design of the cranks, as well as the simple offset in the chainring that allows my cranks to move between bikes with only a new chainring. As for that chain line on all of our 12speed transmissions...... yikes! Come on gearboxes and get here already.

  • @karmaanosa3905
    @karmaanosa3905 2 роки тому +2

    Wow. I've learnt so much from your videos, and I haven't even have a bike yet. I'm still shopping for parts and you sir helped me a lot on what to get and what to avoid. With everything I learned so far, I'm pretty confident that my first mtb build will be enjoyable and should last me a long time before needing an upgrade. Thanks!

  • @AZRob.
    @AZRob. Рік тому +1

    I'm looking to upgrade my cranks and this really helped me understand the differences. Thank you!

    • @LoveMTB
      @LoveMTB  Рік тому +1

      You're very welcome

  • @doncrescas
    @doncrescas 3 роки тому +6

    I love the Shimano rear mechs but I almost always pair with a Sram crankset.
    My thought on chainline these days is generally to get the chainring as much inward as possible.

  • @spddrcr9801
    @spddrcr9801 3 роки тому +1

    Thank you so much for the info!!!! I recently bought a rocky mountain growler 50. I decided to go with an oval chain ring system from one up components only to find out that the deore cranks don't support direct mount spiders / chain rings. I have been racking my brain with all the new superboost vs boost and so on. I found a set of slx cranks that support direct mount of the oneup system and this vid actually clarifies nearly a week of research I have done. thank you again!

  • @jcmaniquiz617
    @jcmaniquiz617 3 роки тому +3

    This video is very timely as I'm about to build my first boost mtb, thank you for this!

  • @g.fortin3228
    @g.fortin3228 3 роки тому +2

    Your level of good information is quite simply the best around ! Every time you put out a video I learn something and I consider myself fairly knowledgeable. I'm struggling with chain line on my '16 Trek Fuel EX8 and buying a new crank soon. Settled in on a Race Face Turbine so I'm hoping there will be enough adjustment to correct mine as well. Keep your channel rolling.. it's quite good and very helpful.

    • @lukeflowers6571
      @lukeflowers6571 3 роки тому

      Did you buy the race face set yet? I am in the same market. I have a goofy boost 141 (148. W/qr) so I need the 55mm chain line. I’m interested to know how to achieve this with Race Face products

  • @dallairforce1
    @dallairforce1 2 роки тому +1

    Thank you so much for this video. I Blindly ordered a M6100 to upgrade from 1x10, to 1x12. Luckily my 148 boost frame has an aggressively indented chainstay at the crank. I measured the shaft on the old crank and it was 115mm just like the M7100. Thank goodness!

  • @polishguywithhardtospellna8227
    @polishguywithhardtospellna8227 3 роки тому +3

    I did suspect chain line falls onto smaller part of the cassette always. Also on mine mixed groupset hack. Despite 10sp cassette is narrower, but that width comes from left side not going into spokes as much. So 1st gear chainline is benefiting the most, plus derailleur gets more spoke distance, which makes the derailleur much less stressed out not having to work so close to spokes 😋

  • @luqmansahib1163
    @luqmansahib1163 Рік тому +6

    Hi there, I had a problem trying to fit oval chainrings to my bike. Most aftermarket ovals have offset which varies depending on type of crank. I found out from the my bike's frame model(boost) is made for 52mm chainline...The bike comes with deore m5100 crankset 32t (11speed) which is has a 52mm chainline. This particular crankset can be used on non boost and boost frames. Same goes for the shimano crankset lineup 52mm chainline m6100/m7100/m8100.(The m6120/m7120/m8120 are 55mm chainline)...However when used on a boost frame like mine. It will give you a very tight clearance especially if u go up to 34t or an oval aftermarket..I would not be surprised if the oval can't fit even with 30t ones because most ovals have offsets bringing the chainring closer to the frame.
    I had to find a solution if i ever want to get a chance to use aftermarket oval chainrings on my bike. Adding spacers to the drive side of the bb to bring out the crank doesn't cut it... This is because you are shifting the crank outboard and it will be a problem to install the left non drive side crank arm. There is not enough to grab onto the spindle and it will not be safe. I know from experience coz mine flew off 😵‍💫 when I did this.This is for shimano cranks as the installation of the crank is different from other brands.I know I had to get a crankset with a longer spindle to accomadate the offset that comes with an oval chainring..
    My solution was to purchase the m6120 (12 speed) with a 55mm chainline..next was the oval chainring from Garbaruk in 32t. The chainring model I purchased states it for m7100 series and the 8100series crankset. However, as long its for the direct mount shimano chainrings it would fit across all models with the exception of the M9100 series(XTR)...I think its because the xtr direct mount requires a different lock ring for the chainring(internal).This oval chainring from Garbaruk has an offset of 3.3mm. My bike ideal chainline according to the manufacturer is 52mm. So, 55mm (crankset chainline) - 3.3mm (oval chainring offset) gives me a 51.7mm chainline which is very close to what I was aiming for.
    My conclusion, if your frame is boost 148mm. Get the 55mm chainline cranks. This enables you to shop around for an aftermarket chainring be it for round or oval ,from different brands and choose an offset and how large a chainring that can fit ,that is ideal for your frame. Do take note some chainrings brands for 12 speed shimano needs to be used with the shimano 12 speed hg+ chain only...I chose Garbaruk coz their chainrings are compatible with all speed (9 and above) chains no matter the brand..check their website.
    If your frame (boost) chainline is 52mm and you get the 52mm chainline shimano crankset, you are limited to probably a round chainring with max of 34t depending on your frame clearance.Also the chainrings must have zero offset because with an offset the chainline will be lesser than 52mm.Unless your frame is meant for maybe a 49mm chainline?
    Just sharing my experience so to help others who are in dilemma of finding the right cranks to fit their bikes.

    • @paulandersson6120
      @paulandersson6120 Рік тому

      Great wright-up, have the exact same problem.

    • @jasons407
      @jasons407 9 місяців тому

      Thanks so much for this - I'm in a similar situation and trying to figure out how to make my chainline work with clearance for an oval chainring. I'll be ordering a Garbaruk chain ring it seems!

  • @hardtailad5618
    @hardtailad5618 3 роки тому +2

    For Shimano 12 speed and non-boost frames, Garbaruk is the best option because they propose chainrings with excellent chain lines and ovals.
    Great video, as always 👍

  • @jackcheung4301
    @jackcheung4301 2 роки тому +1

    World-class professional explanation. Very clear and useful. Tons of thanks.

  • @blakesmith9844
    @blakesmith9844 Рік тому +2

    Some of the best advice online. Thanks for your help.

  • @brianhwang7465
    @brianhwang7465 3 роки тому

    This is so useful I can barely find this information explained this well online let alone a UA-cam video. Please do more of these types of videos!

  • @benmillns8976
    @benmillns8976 3 роки тому +10

    I think it's funny that Shimano finally went direct mount but chose to produce two piece units with a spider attached to the chainring. Aftermarket options look so much cleaner!

    • @mtbboy1993
      @mtbboy1993 3 роки тому +1

      And still no oval chainring. Which has been a huge help with my kneepain.

    • @benmillns8976
      @benmillns8976 3 роки тому +1

      @@mtbboy1993 Same here. I also went down to 170mm cranks which helped.
      We have a manufacturers in the UK called Superstar Components and Uberbike who provide high quality chainrings at much lower prices than Absolute Black. I must have 5-6 of various shapes and sizes lying around.

    • @mtbboy1993
      @mtbboy1993 3 роки тому +1

      @@benmillns8976 getting those will cost same as the Absolute black probably due to added value tax of 25% and shipping cost to 🇳🇴. So I get absolute black. I've not tried superstar components. Absolute black is sold in Norway, its easy to get, I got lucky to get one second hand for good price, even got Renthal Apex stem secondhand. 👌

    • @andyeunson270
      @andyeunson270 Рік тому

      It’s two piece because the ring is steel or titanium in XTR.

  • @JonatandelaTorre
    @JonatandelaTorre Рік тому +1

    Hi, nice to meet you here again after that “strange blackout”.
    I wanted to share with you an trouble that is really becoming a bother to me.
    My mountain bike is old enough for having a non-boost frame and so unique to have a PF30 bb shell 68mm wide (and 46mm diameter).
    so when I upgraded to twelve speed I bought a brand new GARBARuk 6.4mm offset chainring with my new M8100 crankset.
    Long time before I changed the former Shimano bottom bracket with a Token Fusion PF30PS one.
    This time I took my bike to my mechanic to mount the chainring and the crankset. So I didn’t notice anything special.
    But lately I went further with my bottom bracket looking for a noiseless bike and changed that Token bb with a custom mix of clean PF30 rollers (a minimal cup with the 30mm inner diameter roller) and I kept the old Token PF30 to 24mm adaptor.
    So when I put the left crank arm I noticed that it didn’t fit to the axle even with no washer. So I took measures and I got a bit disturbed.
    this is what I got comparing M-8000 vs M-8100 crankset.
    ua-cam.com/video/NEWraGuNGrM/v-deo.html

    • @LoveMTB
      @LoveMTB  Рік тому

      That's a weird one. Did you solve the mistery?
      And yeah, great to be back!

  • @mjojrjr6231
    @mjojrjr6231 Місяць тому +1

    i decided to go with 55mm chainline as the Q-factor is same with my older crank M5100. Not liking the 55mm offset, but I need the chainstay clearance for my crank boots.

  • @nigel4587
    @nigel4587 3 роки тому +1

    Thanks for doing this video, building up a new frame and you've just helped with my last problem, which chainline. Good to also know that the tool only comes with the full crankset.

  • @gatopirao
    @gatopirao 3 роки тому

    You get a like yes or yes.
    I have been doing this investigation about chainline on 12s drivetrains for ages, and there are no other videos out there expalining this as good as you do.
    I am waiting for my 2x10 to die (142mm) to upgrade to 1x12 and have always been worried about not having options for a 49mm chainline.
    I now see 52mm should do OKish with my setup. hoppefully I can install a 34 teeth chainring at the front and not hit the chainstain..
    Thanks, very educational videos that address everyday bikers concerns.

  • @kikoy08
    @kikoy08 3 роки тому

    I get so much information about specifics from this youtube channel than other channels

  • @BrentZahradnik
    @BrentZahradnik 3 місяці тому +1

    Very helpful thanks. Coming from a road background all this MTB stuff is new to me.

    • @LoveMTB
      @LoveMTB  3 місяці тому +1

      @@BrentZahradnik it’s ok I feel the same about the road stuff 😎

  • @wildman9364
    @wildman9364 3 роки тому

    I am using 11 speed with 52mm chainline boost I just installed a new GX 170mm crank from my old NX 175mm crank and I love the new one no problems! Cheers!

  • @thomaskuhn6541
    @thomaskuhn6541 3 роки тому +2

    I was recently looking at upgrading my older RF Turbine crank to Next R and had a look at the RF Q-factor Chainline guide. They have 148 boost paired with a 52mm chainline which is quite a difference from Shimano's 55mm. Also, doing my own measurement, 52mm places the chain in a straight line from the crank to the middle cogs of the cassette on a boost frame. Haven't seen any other sources indicate 55mm for boost and I saw in your video that the angle of the chainline to the largest cog gets fairly extreme with the 7120 (55mm) crank.

  • @huckfin1598
    @huckfin1598 6 місяців тому

    Great video best explanation on UA-cam. Especially the spacers. No one mentions that.

  • @rdunk77
    @rdunk77 3 роки тому +3

    I'm using fc-m7120 on both of my boost bikes. To give a better chainline I'm running the two 3mm spacers on the non-drive side of both bikes.

    • @bryonstewart1631
      @bryonstewart1631 Рік тому

      That makes no sense. The 7120 is the wider of the two cranksets shimano recomends for a boost frame with a 55mm chainline. If you add an additional 3mm spacer on the drive side you are making the chainline 58mm which is more than Shimano's recommended chainline for a super-boost frame.

    • @rdunk77
      @rdunk77 Рік тому

      I removed a 3mm spacer from the drive side not added! 😅

    • @BrentZahradnik
      @BrentZahradnik 2 місяці тому

      I'm considering doing something similiar. I'm not happy with the chainline on my kona unit x with boost wheels and m8120 crank. have one 3mm spacer on each side as specified but it makes the low gears run like crap. Since its a bikepacking build im going to be in that low gear a lot.

  • @rastokandra
    @rastokandra 10 місяців тому +2

    I am using 52mm on my 135mm bike for 1x12 XT with no problem... dont be afraid of it ... 51 cassette is little bit extreme but I try not to use it so often ...

    • @LoveMTB
      @LoveMTB  10 місяців тому +1

      Thanks for confirming, it is what Shimano says also!😊

  • @XCRiders
    @XCRiders 2 роки тому

    It’s so easy to order the wrong part these days thank you for your videos I just ordered a 175 crankset luckily I got the right part 🤩 M9100 xtr I was confused because the non-drive side arm reads 9100/9120
    But the Drive side only reads 9100 it’s perfect now I can hammer my new longer arms

  • @bikechiatrist
    @bikechiatrist 3 роки тому

    Your channel is really a bug help to MTB community 🤘🏽

  • @ludekrichter6049
    @ludekrichter6049 3 роки тому +3

    I have a Ritchey Ultra frame with 148 mm boost spacing and based on the Ritchey website, the chainline for this frame is 52 mm. I am running XT 8100 cranks and everything seems to run fine.

  • @mtbbiker6401
    @mtbbiker6401 3 роки тому +7

    WHY? WHY? WHY does Shimano recommend 52mm chain line for 135/142 frames? I spaced my M5100 crankset chainring (96 bcd) from 52mm back to 47.5mm by using 4.5mm worth of spacers and longer 16mm chainring bolts. Wish I didn't have to do that. Wish Shimano made a 1x crankset with 48mm chain line for their newer drivetrains. I'm loving the Deore M5100 drivetrain, just wished they made a crankset with 48mm chain line. My chain stays are only 425mm so 52mm chain line angle was too extreme. I do a lot of climbing in 51T cog. My drivetrain works perfectly, but only because I reduced my chain line to 47.5mm. No problem backpedaling on 51T cog.

    • @Shurup33
      @Shurup33 3 роки тому

      I have same problem .. f+ck shimano, i hate this evil company i have spent touch money on single upgrade and got wrong chainline with my 73mm bb...

    • @noellereypelayo551
      @noellereypelayo551 3 роки тому

      What spacer did you use?

    • @Shurup33
      @Shurup33 3 роки тому

      @@noellereypelayo551 no spacers

    • @mtbbiker6401
      @mtbbiker6401 3 роки тому

      @@noellereypelayo551 I placed nylon spacers between the chainring and the crankarm in order to move the chainring closer to the frame in order to reduce my chain line from 52mm to 47.5. I had to purchase longer chainring bolts. Went from 12mm to 16mm long bolts.

  • @a.sonetwo4547
    @a.sonetwo4547 2 роки тому

    Great Video great explanation, althought sram groupset on my bike. Installed my 55mm cranks even though my bike has a 52mm chainline and I have to say everything works great. You are doing a great job my friend. Thank you 👍🏻😀

  • @charleylewis3672
    @charleylewis3672 2 роки тому

    This video was super helpful and exactly what I was looking for. Thanks so much!

  • @TeamCykelhold
    @TeamCykelhold 3 роки тому +1

    Thanks for the Vid. Good stuff as usual. On my Sb150 I ended up put the spacer on the NDS side to get a better chainline, and it eliminated drops on backpedal on largest cog.

    • @TeamCykelhold
      @TeamCykelhold 3 роки тому

      @@LoveMTB I'm loving it so far but I haven't tried it on real proper rough trails other than one weekend, so I look forward to putting some time on it this season. I just ordered a Mara Pro as I am not completely happy with the X2. Normal days I ride a smaller 120mm bike. Will you be making a review and bike check on your steeds at some point? Since you do spend some time tinkering and thinking about specs I think it could be interesting. Also if you do your own suspension service, it could also be great content if you do full rebuilds!

    • @mi16chap
      @mi16chap Рік тому

      Also got an SB-150 and about to fit a new 8100 crank, any idea what the part number for that spacer is, just ordered Y0JC61000 but its just a paper thin sticker, not a 3mm plastic ring like in the video

  • @saidnamor
    @saidnamor 2 роки тому

    Shozaburo Shimano will be proud of you!

  • @ronelaliento09
    @ronelaliento09 3 роки тому

    I thought I was watching about mountain bikes, turns out to rocket engineering. Cheers great in depth understandable information.

  • @jefflee7704
    @jefflee7704 2 роки тому

    Thank you brother, really appreciate your videos, spot on now I can order my new crank set and chainring

  • @dadama66
    @dadama66 2 роки тому

    Great video. This helped me resolve an issue I was having on my Chromag Rootdown. I was looking at installing an older M780 Crank but the spindle isn't long enough. Shimano specify Qfactor but not the actual spindle length. Looks like I need an 8120.

  • @NorthernSkiAndCycle
    @NorthernSkiAndCycle 3 роки тому +1

    I had the M8120 on my 2020 Trek Fuel EX 9.8, but once I built my 2021 Banshee Paradox with the same crankset it caused terrible back pedaling (would come off top 3 cogs), I had to find a small chainline crankset. I got an M7100, which funny enough was lighter by 70 grams than the M8120 because of the shorter spindle.

  • @jareklotz
    @jareklotz 3 місяці тому +1

    Well, nice and complex explanation. Thank you.

    • @LoveMTB
      @LoveMTB  3 місяці тому

      You are welcome!

  • @AlexanderSio
    @AlexanderSio 3 роки тому

    Super useful. Love the channel. Keep up the good work.

  • @darojos
    @darojos 3 роки тому

    Good info. I think that you just explained why garbaruk offers a custom offset. The standard offset is 3.3mm and the custom is 6.4, Seems like it is intended to give [6,7,8,9]120 owners and option for are narrower chainline.

  • @johngibson712
    @johngibson712 3 роки тому

    During my Chameleon build, I was pulling my hair out trying to fit a Shimano crankset, especially since I plan on running the bike with a short 415 chainstay (they are adjustable up to 430). I wish you had released this video a month ago - a great summary of the current Shimano crankset offerings. You would have saved my several hours of research. HA!
    My Chameleon, like your Yeti needs cranks with a Q factor larger than 172 mm for clearance. However I really need to run a chainline as close to 52 mm as possible or my dang chain will drop off at the slightest back crank. So the Shimano cranks were a no go for me. There is a reason these bikes come spec'ed with Sram cranks and I wish Shimano would figure this out. I bought Raceface cranks instead.

    • @johngibson712
      @johngibson712 3 роки тому

      @@LoveMTB Yes RF does have varying spindle lengths. I have the Aeffect R cranks on order with a 137 spindle, 175 Q factor and 51 mm chainline. No rides on the bike yet, still waiting for the fork to come in. :-(

  • @timothyrajah6350
    @timothyrajah6350 Рік тому

    Excellent Video. Concise explanation. Love it! KUDOS!

  • @briangong007
    @briangong007 3 роки тому

    Good info. This has come up a lot on ARC build discussions

  • @МихаилМиронов-ю8т
    @МихаилМиронов-ю8т 3 роки тому +1

    For 49 mm chainline you can use aftermarket chainrings.

  • @mazditzo
    @mazditzo 3 роки тому

    thanks as always, this question I have for quite some times finally answered 👍

  • @TC-hl1ws
    @TC-hl1ws 3 роки тому

    Excellent information that I needed!

  • @kopter28
    @kopter28 3 роки тому +2

    Super informative as always. I originally installed the XT FC-M8120 with 55mm chainline crank on my BOOST frame, but found the chainline a bit to extreme and my chain was actually dropping when backpedaling on the largest two cogs. Replaced the crank with the XT FC-M8100 with 52mm chainline, which the frame still had tons of clearance for and now everything is great. The chain stays on my frame are 420mm.

    • @gizmou77
      @gizmou77 3 роки тому

      The same thing happened to me. My bike came with an XT M8120 and I exchanged it for an XT M8100. At the moment I have a 32 tooth plate. When I go to mount the 34 I will see if I have space, if not, I will mount the XT M8120 again. It is an Orbea Oiz M10.

    • @lcfc42
      @lcfc42 3 роки тому

      Might be a stupid question but could you just run 2 spacers on the non drive side and non on the drive side to get 52mm chain line?

    • @lcfc42
      @lcfc42 3 роки тому

      @@LoveMTB Because you made a purchasing error :) I have mine set-up the correct way with 73mm bb and it seems larger than 55m chainline so need to put both specers on the non drive side.

  • @tomoffer7166
    @tomoffer7166 2 роки тому +2

    Running m7100 (52mm) with 32t round on a Yeti arc, wondered why the clearance is tight AF. This is an extremely useful video. I'm going to keep running as I am for now, especially since I get a better chainline in a hilly area, but it is super tight! No way could I go oval or 34t. Great video, thanks!

  • @abrahamchairez8699
    @abrahamchairez8699 2 роки тому

    So if I’m understanding this correctly. Quick and easy way to seeing which chain line you have is took look for what size spacers you bike has? If any

  • @PeterSz73
    @PeterSz73 2 місяці тому +1

    I wish I knew this before I ordered 7100 for my boost mtb frame. If I add any spacers the safety clip does not clear the hole on the non drive side of the crank shaft as it does not stick out enough. My workaround is no spacers.

    • @LoveMTB
      @LoveMTB  2 місяці тому +1

      7100 should work just fine with Boost, it’s the chainline that the manufacturer of frame prefers that makes it interesting

    • @PeterSz73
      @PeterSz73 2 місяці тому

      @@LoveMTB I've got an aftermarket oval chainring that sits about 2mm farther out (offset?) than the factory shimano one. Problem solved - sort of.

  • @mtbbiker6401
    @mtbbiker6401 3 роки тому

    Just installed a M5100-1 crankset on a full suspension frame with BSA 73mm bb and 142mm thru-axle. The M5100-1 is set at 52mm. I moved the 2.5mm bb spacer from the drive side to the non-drive side. By doing so I offset my crank by 2.5mm therefore reducing my chain line from 52mm to 49.5mm. I can't go any closer as I don't have enough frame clearance for the chainring and tire clearance is close when in the 51T cog. I will be testing over the next few weeks.

    • @mtbbiker6401
      @mtbbiker6401 3 роки тому

      @@LoveMTB Works great!. M5100-1 (32T) crankset, RD-M5100 SGS, M5100 11-51T cassette (11 speed) and CN-HG701 chain. Moved 2.5mm drive side bb spacer to non-drive side. That moved my crankset and chain ring inward by 2.5mm for a crank chain line of 49.5mm. I can't go any closer since I only have about 1mm of clearance between the chain stay and chainring. I have non-boost full suspension frame with 142mm thru axle in the rear running 27.5x2.4" tires. Only 420mm chain stay length in uncompressed position which grows by about 25mm with rear suspension compressed. Chain is a little close to the tire while in the 51T cog but seems to be okay. Took it for a ride this morning climbing in the 51T cog I was able to backpedal without dropping the chain into smaller cog. Very smooth and precise shifting for a mid-range Deore M5100 drivetrain. I'm happy!

    • @mtbbiker6401
      @mtbbiker6401 3 роки тому

      The only issue was the chain length. Shimano recommends adding 5-6 links plus quick link with suspension in fully compressed (or longest chain stay length) for the M5100 SGS derailleur. I used this method but chain was too slack so I removed 2 links and it seems to be perfect now.

  • @mf3616
    @mf3616 3 роки тому +2

    I used the M6120 on my boost frame. Chainline was way too outward when using the larger cogs. I think it varies with bike to bike. Does not mean M6100/7100/8100 is definitely for non boost or that M6120/7120/8120 is for boost etc. I also contacted Transition about this and they actually recommended the M6100/7100/8100 on their bikes though they are boosted frame. So best is to check with the bike manufacturer.

    • @tinshield
      @tinshield 3 роки тому

      To fix that chain line grab this spacer kit:
      www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07N4CSRS8/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_search_asin_title?ie=UTF8&psc=1
      Just make sure the total spacers equal whatever Shimano gives you.

    • @mf3616
      @mf3616 3 роки тому +1

      @@tinshield Chainline is too outward though still usable. Adding spacers will make it worse right??

    • @tinshield
      @tinshield 3 роки тому +1

      @@mf3616 not if you add a 1mm spacer to the drive side and add the balance to the non-drive side.

    • @mf3616
      @mf3616 3 роки тому

      @@tinshield It will not feel good while pedaling mate. Feet placement will be all over the place.

    • @tinshield
      @tinshield 3 роки тому

      @@mf3616 that’s false. It’s not enough variation.

  • @spinningtrue
    @spinningtrue 3 роки тому

    Really clear and easy to understand, thanks!

  • @horusgarcia1
    @horusgarcia1 10 місяців тому +1

    Okay, so if I am using a non-boost frame and a 12 speed 1x, then the chainline shouldn't depend on the cassette. It should always be 52mm, right? I usually align with no. 6 cog from the smallest. Is that why I get a slow down-shift from the largest?

  • @cloud_mosa
    @cloud_mosa 21 день тому +1

    Technically, crank manufacturers should make chainrings or crankarms to adopt every single O.L.D., I decide to use MT510 crankset on my 135mm QR old bike but its 52mm chain line is obviously optimized for 148mm rear axle.

    • @LoveMTB
      @LoveMTB  21 день тому

      I agree but I assume they did this to minimize SKUs, nothing else.

  • @MrDistill
    @MrDistill 3 роки тому

    Every week I get bike smarter ! Thank you!

  • @ControlAltGar
    @ControlAltGar Рік тому +1

    what should be the correct chainline on those two cases: 10s on boost frame and 12s on no-boost frame?

    • @LoveMTB
      @LoveMTB  Рік тому

      10s uses a 49mm chainline, regardless of the rear spacing. 12s uses a 52mm chainline regarless of the rear spacing of the bike.

  • @andrewmacgregor6496
    @andrewmacgregor6496 3 роки тому

    Using Garbaruk 6mm offset chainring with M7100 SLX crankset on 135mm rear hub - chainline now great!

    • @andrewmacgregor6496
      @andrewmacgregor6496 3 роки тому

      @@LoveMTB Great video thank you. Manufacturers are not making things easy for the average Joe.

  • @Nilla_S
    @Nilla_S 3 роки тому

    This is good info when i`m going to change the whole system in the future. "Saved video"

    • @Nilla_S
      @Nilla_S 3 роки тому

      @@LoveMTB Not just watched, but also saved. I`m using your videos when i`m working/upgrading on my bikes! I Don`t need a bikeshop anymore.
      Thanx!

  • @julesmorrissey
    @julesmorrissey 2 роки тому

    Another very useful video - thanks.

  • @livefreeandshred9818
    @livefreeandshred9818 3 роки тому

    55mm chain line on my new slash, 52mm on my fuel ex. Both boost148 and xt8120 on the slash and raceface affect r on the fuel

  • @przytulowcekurdezesz
    @przytulowcekurdezesz Рік тому +1

    I have a question, I bought a SW EPIC EVO frame that has 52 chain lines and I bought the whole XX SL groupset with a power meter crank that is on a 55 chain line and the crank is 34T and 3mm offset. It is also possible to buy a 34T with 0mm offset. I'm not a mechanic, but I'm wondering what can I do in this situation? Please help!

    • @LoveMTB
      @LoveMTB  Рік тому

      Don't worry about it, just install it. And check out my mini0series on the Transmission for more info - ua-cam.com/play/PLAXVoVap1M6ujA8bbEOQLDRI_ElQtvu5T.html

  • @Chunky246
    @Chunky246 Рік тому +1

    Dumb question... when a chainring offers 3mm offset, is that outward or inward? Assuming outward? So if I added a 3mm offset chainring to the SLX M7100-1 it would give me a 55mm chainline?

    • @LoveMTB
      @LoveMTB  Рік тому +1

      It’s inward and Shimano does not use/ provide different chainline chainrings only some 3rd party and XTR replacement specific

  • @whysomanyphils
    @whysomanyphils Рік тому +1

    Great and very informative video!
    I see from your other SLX review video that you have a 2018 giant trance 3 - it's a boost bike with stock cranks (FC-M7100-B) that have a 3 mm offset and 172 Q factor - if I'm going to upgrade to SLX 1x12 should I be getting the FC-7100 that better matches the stock config? I'm worried that the FC-7120 with 55 mm chainline would be problematic with the 51t as you mentioned.

    • @LoveMTB
      @LoveMTB  Рік тому

      I would go for the 52mm chainline if the bike permits.

  • @mstvir
    @mstvir 3 роки тому

    Finally I understand what is what. Thanks so much :)
    As for what I use currently on my non boost frame, I have no idea it's regular XT M8000, so I am guessing 49mm or 52mm?

  • @johnschick716
    @johnschick716 3 роки тому

    Great video. Exactly what I wanted to know.

  • @31acruz
    @31acruz 11 днів тому +1

    Great video. Can you make one for SRAM cranks? thanks.

    • @LoveMTB
      @LoveMTB  10 днів тому

      Good suggestion 👍 meantime I have a DUB BB video that kind of talks about this

  • @alonsorivas8648
    @alonsorivas8648 Рік тому +1

    Hello dear, could you help me with a question, my boost 148 frames are for 27'5 plus 2.8 wheels, the most recommended cranks are 7120 Qfactor 178? Does 7120 work for chain line 52 and 55 or only 55? thanks

    • @LoveMTB
      @LoveMTB  Рік тому +1

      55mm with the standard chainring

  • @shabapotata
    @shabapotata 2 роки тому

    Recently tried to mount an xtr m9100 crankset with 52mm chainline on my 2017 kona honzo AL and the crankarm hit the chainstay. The bike can hold 27.5 x 3" tires so i needed bigger clearance. Funny enough my m8000 cranks work just fine but im now putting on a m7120 crankset to run full microspline hg+.

    • @shabapotata
      @shabapotata 2 роки тому

      @@LoveMTBmy wife and i share an old fatbike and the honzo plus is the 2nd winter bike!

  • @alejandromtb
    @alejandromtb 3 роки тому

    Thanks for your work and this video. I watch all your videos to be sure of what and how to buy a new part to improve my bike. After the Shimano BB-500-PA bottom bracket started to make noise with no more than 250 miles on a Trek Fuel EX 5 Deore 2021 bike I decided to improve the bike yes or yes, I want to start with the powertrain, I bought the bottom bracket of the Wheels Manufacturing brand and now waiting for it to arrive, I started looking for the crankset. My bike comes with a very rare Shimano 12 speed MT-511 because the Q-Factor is 178.5mm and the Chainline is 52mm, but when you look for those dimensions on the Deore XT 8100 series, the FC-8100-1 comes with a 52mm chainline BUT with a Q-Factor 172mm (6mm less) but that is very close to the frame I had to then choose the FC-8120-1 that comes with the Q-factor 178 almost the same as the MT-511 only 0.5mm less but with a chainline greater than 55mm. I hope it works for me because I have no other idea what to do.

    • @alejandromtb
      @alejandromtb 3 роки тому

      @@LoveMTB well after some math, I realized that the outgoing not drive crank arm, the left, was 3mm thicker that the FC-MT-8120, so for that part the spacer that came with the crank arm XT, fix that, but on the other side with a spacer of 1 mm ,for me, was enough because, the 3mm was to big the chains ring stay to far from the frame, then 3mm spacer on the left side and 1mm on the right side and the distance between rear arm of the frame and the crank arm is almost the same on both side maybe 1mm more or less but for me don’t bother me. I have ride more that 40 miles and not issues neither changing up and down the different speeds without adjust the rear derailleur. Everything is smooth now and much much better. Any advice is welcome.

  • @DANIELPONCE1000
    @DANIELPONCE1000 2 роки тому

    Hola te felicito por el buen video
    Una pregunta para saber q linia de cadena es la correcta en mi bicicleta y como sacarla y como ajustarlo

  • @enzomongelli5234
    @enzomongelli5234 Рік тому +1

    Merci pour cette vidéo qui m à ouvert les yeux car effectivement shimano a trois ligne de chaîne et moi j j'opterai pour la 52mm
    Cordialement

  • @royconejo
    @royconejo 3 роки тому +1

    Does shifting gets negatively affected by moving the chainline 3 mm apart? I have entirely solved chain dropping on a 52 mm chainline by moving one of BB-52s 2.5 mm spacers to the non-drive side. Still, I wonder if that negatively affects shifting. I had SO much trouble adjusting the rear derailler to work with a SunRace CZ800 cassette that I don't want to touch anything else :(

  • @arielmapalo8015
    @arielmapalo8015 2 роки тому

    Good day. Love seeing your videos. So if my frame is Giant XTC SLR boost 148, ideally the M7120 is right for me?

  • @RGCastro7
    @RGCastro7 3 роки тому

    Good info! Thank you for sharing.

  • @ldvcbi4317
    @ldvcbi4317 10 місяців тому +1

    Hello everybody,
    My trek procaliber 9.5 is coming from Factory with a BB-MT500-PA bottom bracket, PF92 frame.
    On the description of bike the crankset have a 52mm chainline, rear axle 12x148 (boost).
    I read a lot about chainline and in general the conclusion is for a boost rear axle ideal chainline is from 51 to 53mm so i think in the future when i will have to change crankset i will use 52mm because my bike is with a 52mm from factory and the cost for a crankset with a 52mm or other chainline is the same so i think if they use 52mm on MY bike from factory it's because this solution is the best.
    I think it's better to follow the 1st factory mount and origin specs of the bike description?
    Regarding the Q-factor i think reading a lot about it, it's not a big problem if there's a small difference between the original Q-factor from factory and a different Q-factor from a new crankset.
    In your opinion i am correct or wrong in my message?
    Best regards.

    • @LoveMTB
      @LoveMTB  10 місяців тому

      What are you trying to do? 148 mm rear is Boost so 52mm yes

    • @ldvcbi4317
      @ldvcbi4317 10 місяців тому +1

      @@LoveMTB thanks for your confirmation i wasn't 100% sure my information was OK.
      For my bike with my tire clearance max tyre clearance 2.4" and boost axle 12x148 the good chainline is 52mm.

    • @LoveMTB
      @LoveMTB  10 місяців тому

      @@ldvcbi4317 yes indeed it is what I would do

  • @COSTASV1969
    @COSTASV1969 3 роки тому +1

    Thanks for the information.

  • @eea999
    @eea999 7 місяців тому +1

    Very good video! I want to replace my crank with an SLX and not sure which chainline. In this case, can i buy the 55mm chainline crank and in case it is too much, i swap the the drive side spacer to the non drive side and then i habe 52mm chainline? Does it make sense or sounds stupid..lol

    • @LoveMTB
      @LoveMTB  7 місяців тому

      You got it right!

  • @6786lned
    @6786lned 9 місяців тому +1

    I have the XT 8120 for a 2020 Marin Alpine Trail8 73mm , if I use no spacers at all on the drive side I get a better chainline in 12th gear and no chain drop if pedaling backwards, I have one spacer on the non drive side plus the one with the cranks tha has the little ridge. Is it ok to run none of the spacers on the drive side ?

    • @LoveMTB
      @LoveMTB  9 місяців тому +1

      Definitely ok if you don't have any play on the axle and your chainring doesn't touch the frame.

    • @6786lned
      @6786lned 8 місяців тому

      is it also ok not to use the two spacers with the little rubber lip that come with the XT cranks? Mainly on the drive side@@LoveMTB

  • @Mauricioblueangels
    @Mauricioblueangels 3 роки тому

    thank you so much for sharing this information!🇧🇷

  • @Wroe
    @Wroe 3 роки тому

    GREAT and very informative as per usual ... it looks like you are using a PF30 bottom bracket is that correct? and you went with a crankset with a larger Q-Factor to accommodate the oval chainring.?? The same drive gear is fitted to trance 29er 2 2021 so I like to know what size crank is fitted to that from factory

    • @Wroe
      @Wroe 3 роки тому

      @@LoveMTB Righ so you didn't use the one ticked in your vid .. it threw me ....

  • @flowbike4487
    @flowbike4487 Рік тому +1

    So according your knowlage i can put shimano crank xtr 9100 with chain line 52mm and Q-factor 162 to my frame in boost standard 148mm

    • @LoveMTB
      @LoveMTB  Рік тому

      Yes unless the frame manufacturer mentions something about the narrow Qfactor

    • @flowbike4487
      @flowbike4487 Рік тому +1

      @@LoveMTB hmmm i have specialized chisel frame and i can't find info about narrow Q-factor specification :/

    • @LoveMTB
      @LoveMTB  Рік тому

      Chances are you're fine then.@@flowbike4487

    • @stefanocspt6732
      @stefanocspt6732 Рік тому +1

      Some frames requires 55mm chain line , despite having 148mm rear boost spacing . I think this is the case of frame with very short chainstay .

    • @LoveMTB
      @LoveMTB  Рік тому +1

      @@stefanocspt6732 or room for big tires, I have that exact scenario on my Yeti ARC

  • @jonienglish3231
    @jonienglish3231 Рік тому +1

    Good Video
    How about SRAM Crankset ?
    Are the Spindles all the same for 49mm,55mm and super boost chain line ?
    I think Sram just using 6mm ,3mm and 0 offset chainring.

    • @LoveMTB
      @LoveMTB  Рік тому +1

      Very similar on SRAM, check my last video on T-Type Cranksets

    • @jonienglish3231
      @jonienglish3231 Рік тому +1

      @@LoveMTB how about Road Crankset can a Road Crankset fit. MTB frame ?

    • @LoveMTB
      @LoveMTB  Рік тому

      @@jonienglish3231 what are you trying to do?🤔

    • @jonienglish3231
      @jonienglish3231 Рік тому

      @@LoveMTB got a 2011 Cannondale Bad Boy, converting to a 1x10, originally had a triple Crankset, shell is BSA 68mm was going to either put a 10 speed XT Crankset or try to put a China CNC Crankset looks quite nice has lots of drilled dimples on the Crankset arms.alao has 24mm aluminum spindle. Spindle length is 112mm where bearing rides +13mm for Crankset interface

  • @artoutlawphoto
    @artoutlawphoto 2 роки тому

    wow you nailed it. Thank you!, now i know what are the difference.

  • @DamianNocun
    @DamianNocun 2 роки тому

    This is a perfect explanation which I was looking for for long time ! Very nice explained and thank you. I was not sure if my Procaliber bike can use Deore M6100 with 52mm chain line and now I know that yes :) Can somebody also advice, if Im changing crankset to 32 teethes from 30, (plus cassette 51 Deore M6100) should i also extend chain ?

  • @jacklo325
    @jacklo325 Рік тому

    Awesome explanation.