Keep up the good work. Water is a very good cheap alternative for metals. Specially with big surface area. They used to call all metals as reflectors back in the day. Tinfoil is good alternative to experiment with bigger surface area too. Kitchen plastic wrap is a good cheap separator for the full roll.
Nice experiments! I bet you you will get better results using a foil sheet coated with graphene at the end of your wire. Check out the "graphene super store". I also expect better results when cloudy outside. I eventually used one wire that separates into 7 wires by soldering more wires onto the one wire, and then back down to one wire.
If you collect electrons from the air, you must close the circuit with the voltmeter or ammeter with the negative pole: the earth. You can not think of having potential, verifying two poles both in the air. I hope my advice can be useful to you. I always follow you. Gerry
I WOULD ASSUME THAT SINCE LECTRICITY TRAVELS ON THE OUTSIDE OF THE WIRE AND NOT INSIDE IT MAKES SENSE THAT THE THICKER THE WIRE WOULD HELP WITH HEAT DISPENCE AND ALSO OUTSIDE SURFACE FOR MORE ELECTRONS TO TRAVEL ON THE OUTSIDE SO IT NOT MAKING A DIFFERENCE IS CONFUSING UNLESS THE STRENGTH OF THE ELECTRICITY YOUR ATTRACTING IS NOT STRONG ENOUGH FROM THE GROUND YOU ARE WORKING FROM A MUCH HIGH HIEGHT IS KEY TO IT ALL I WOULD THINK 8)
I agree that higher will work better. For now I want to see what will work best at 'head' level, just because it's easier to experiment at this level. Thanks for commenting!
It is very hard to make any constructive comment unless you make clear exactly what the circuit is tha you are connecting to. You should draw the circuit and what points you are attaching the meter leads to. Also whether you are measuring AC volts, DC volts or AC or DC current. Your picture is not good enough to see where you have the meter selected. Also, what your "antenna" circuit iis, length of wire , etc. Part of the problem that can lead to confusing or inconclusive results is that digital meters are susceptible to noise. You need both leads connected to an actual circuit, otherwise it is impossible to determine if you are actually measuring something or not. An old analog style meter with a needle movement works better at eliminating "noise" and differentiating real voltage and current measurements from noise in the meter circuitry. If you can't see actual needle movement on the analog meter, you are not really measuring anything on the digital meter. Using the "electrolytes" is also just confusing the issue!! If you want to measure currents through electrolytes, you might make some make some meaningful measurements but what I watched in this video was essentially meaningless. At best, all you are doing is slightly changing the humidity and Ph of the air at the electrode. Neither is a good conductor although slightly better than dry air. If you are going to draw some conclusions, then you might then also try dipping them in plain water, milk and maybe Vodka or urine!! These might seem to give different results, but what would be the point?? Define a theory and test it. Collecting random data which is most likely invalid, seems like a pointless exercise. What are you hoping to prove?
😮😮😮very amaizing continuos with this experiments
More to come; continuing.....
Always cool to catch up on your experiments. Thanks for sharing them.
My pleasure!
Keep up the good work. Water is a very good cheap alternative for metals. Specially with big surface area. They used to call all metals as reflectors back in the day. Tinfoil is good alternative to experiment with bigger surface area too. Kitchen plastic wrap is a good cheap separator for the full roll.
Thanks for the info
That's interesting thanks for the information 👍🇺🇸
No problem 👍
Sounds like potentially a resistance deal with the big wire not outdoing the smaller
I don't know.....
Tesla engineer eric dollard comes to mind. Blessings
Thanks for watching!
Nice experiments!
I bet you you will get better results using a foil sheet coated with graphene at the end of your wire. Check out the "graphene super store".
I also expect better results when cloudy outside.
I eventually used one wire that separates into 7 wires by soldering more wires onto the one wire, and then back down to one wire.
Good to hear from you Paul; thanks for the tips!
If you collect electrons from the air, you must close the circuit with the voltmeter or ammeter with the negative pole: the earth.
You can not think of having potential, verifying two poles both in the air.
I hope my advice can be useful to you.
I always follow you.
Gerry
Thanks for following and commenting!
@doubleMinnovations thanks for your commitment.
What effect do you get with a common screendoor coil spring at different levela of stretch ?
I WOULD ASSUME THAT SINCE LECTRICITY TRAVELS ON THE OUTSIDE OF THE WIRE AND NOT INSIDE IT MAKES SENSE THAT THE THICKER THE WIRE WOULD HELP WITH HEAT DISPENCE AND ALSO OUTSIDE SURFACE FOR MORE ELECTRONS TO TRAVEL ON THE OUTSIDE SO IT NOT MAKING A DIFFERENCE IS CONFUSING UNLESS THE STRENGTH OF THE ELECTRICITY YOUR ATTRACTING IS NOT STRONG ENOUGH FROM THE GROUND YOU ARE WORKING FROM A MUCH HIGH HIEGHT IS KEY TO IT ALL I WOULD THINK 8)
I agree that higher will work better. For now I want to see what will work best at 'head' level, just because it's easier to experiment at this level. Thanks for commenting!
It is very hard to make any constructive comment unless you make clear exactly what the circuit is tha you are connecting to. You should draw the circuit and what points you are attaching the meter leads to. Also whether you are measuring AC volts, DC volts or AC or DC current. Your picture is not good enough to see where you have the meter selected. Also, what your "antenna" circuit iis, length of wire , etc.
Part of the problem that can lead to confusing or inconclusive results is that digital meters are susceptible to noise. You need both leads connected to an actual circuit, otherwise it is impossible to determine if you are actually measuring something or not. An old analog style meter with a needle movement works better at eliminating "noise" and differentiating real voltage and current measurements from noise in the meter circuitry. If you can't see actual needle movement on the analog meter, you are not really measuring anything on the digital meter.
Using the "electrolytes" is also just confusing the issue!! If you want to measure currents through electrolytes, you might make some make some meaningful measurements but what I watched in this video was essentially meaningless. At best, all you are doing is slightly changing the humidity and Ph of the air at the electrode. Neither is a good conductor although slightly better than dry air. If you are going to draw some conclusions, then you might then also try dipping them in plain water, milk and maybe Vodka or urine!! These might seem to give different results, but what would be the point??
Define a theory and test it. Collecting random data which is most likely invalid, seems like a pointless exercise. What are you hoping to prove?