"Ideal Money and the Motivation of Savings and Thrift" by John F. Nash, Jr. Ph.D.

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 90

  • @PURPLE_SHADE_SMOOTHIE
    @PURPLE_SHADE_SMOOTHIE Місяць тому +28

    I am convinced that Jon Nash and Satoshi Nakamoto are one and the same. RIP John Nash and thank you for your gift to humanity

    • @lornemacdougall884
      @lornemacdougall884 Місяць тому

      Me too

    • @kresimirzex2720
      @kresimirzex2720 22 дні тому +2

      this ppl in the crowd dont know he is talking about bitcoin this entire lecture. thats a shame, if they knew it would be a much more exciting experience for them. i hope some of them now read my comment and gets some flash-back excitement.

    • @andresbu
      @andresbu 10 днів тому

      @@kresimirzex2720 his mind is bitcoin

  • @lornemacdougall884
    @lornemacdougall884 Місяць тому +10

    The great John Nash AKA Satoshi Nakamoto AKA The Prince of Peace. RIP John and thank you for your contrubution towards humanity. Bitcoin will end Tyrany and rein in a new era of enlightenment.

  • @devarajagopalan9059
    @devarajagopalan9059 4 роки тому +11

    So touching is Dr.Nash ‘s life and I virtually into tears and I wept the whole time I read the book “A beautiful mind” as well as the movie.

  • @RichardMorriswave
    @RichardMorriswave 10 років тому +7

    He was talking about I think the ideas of equilibrium when applied to maths. As in money being too do with a natural idea rather than a man made idea which is not as perfect.

  • @SatWiseJanx
    @SatWiseJanx Місяць тому +2

    I beleive deep in my heart that Dr. Nash was Satoshi Nakamotto

  • @KainniaK
    @KainniaK 3 роки тому +18

    This man was Satoshi Nakamoto. Toko "I am Nash" Sato, his idea of using electricity as a basis for a global reserve currency will radically change this world for the better or the worse.

    • @randoroo2540
      @randoroo2540 7 місяців тому +1

      Yup

    • @arbo3495
      @arbo3495 Місяць тому

      What are your points to thinking so?

    • @KainniaK
      @KainniaK Місяць тому

      I met his son Johnny in a mental hospital and he told me. He said: nobody will believe you anways so I can just tell you. But later I realized that only somebody with schizophrenic paranoia that had already invented encryption schemes for the NSA would be so incredibley batshit insanely disciplines to be able to invent Bitcoin and be active online for many years without any trace to their real idendity. Almost every human that tries this fucks up and contaminates their real identity with their alter ago. But Satoshi Nakamoto did not make a single mistake because he was so entirely driven to do so by his paranoia. He was also known to have a tick of always needing everybody in the car to have their seatbelts on, or he would freak out. And then he died in a car crash with his wife because they where not wearing their seatbelts. While the taxi driver had nothing. Yeah not buying it. But if you want even more evidence just read everything Satoshi ever wrote and then read everything Nash wrote, you will see they write exactly the same.
      If Nash was murdered, it wasn't because they had evidence he was Satoshi. It was because they wanted to use Bitcoin as a mean of control and did not want to take any chances so they took him out just in case. That same year in 2015, Bitcoin had a hostile take over. Many old devs where kicked out. Tether showed up as well. And now Bitcoin doesnt' work as currency anymore and can't ever reach a nash equilibirum. And tracking people using it, is millions of times more easy for the NSA then when people use bank accounts. So the powers to be, they took something that was suppose to make us free and now they will use it to make us slaves. Bitcoin will go to a 100 million dollars, make no mistake. But it will enslave people like nothing ever has before.

    • @kresimirzex2720
      @kresimirzex2720 29 днів тому

      ​@@arbo3495he is the only guy that had all the tools to make it. He had developed his own multi layer encryption, he knew about computers since 1954 . and was a master, developer, mathematician, he understood economy, and game theory. So everything. And he was alive in 2008. Actually in this video he created Bitcoin already 1 or 2 years before this talk.

    • @kresimirzex2720
      @kresimirzex2720 29 днів тому

      He is talking about ideal money. But it must not allow the option od corruption- he is definining Bitcoin right in this talk u just have to listen.

  • @anandram6974
    @anandram6974 9 років тому +7

    Truly a great mind.

  • @assaad33
    @assaad33 2 роки тому +6

    Wish someone asked Nash at that conference about his views on bitcoin

    • @KainniaK
      @KainniaK Місяць тому +1

      He was Satoshi Nakamoto, the inventor of Bitcoin

    • @MindbodyMedic
      @MindbodyMedic 24 дні тому +1

      Stop spreading rumours and innuendo some guy who wants to sell a book convinced you is true. Note he also stole this idea from another guy.

    • @andresbu
      @andresbu 10 днів тому

      @@KainniaK he is satoshi

  • @djarotsembodo6304
    @djarotsembodo6304 3 роки тому +3

    Awesome explaination of using money ideally. As charity, donation, social welfare including Islamic theory of money. Business and economic stimulate benefit.
    ICPI (Industrial Consumption Price Index) to measure Ideal money. etc...
    👍👍👍

  • @dulbrev
    @dulbrev Місяць тому +1

    Thank you, Satoshi

  • @salcedop
    @salcedop 11 років тому +9

    Everything about that introduction speech was a complete trainwreck.

  • @djalilovarakhmatovna1790
    @djalilovarakhmatovna1790 5 років тому +2

    Does have somebody the text of this speech?

    • @assaad33
      @assaad33 2 роки тому +2

      Here you go: www.osce.org/files/f/documents/b/e/102073.pdf I found it

  • @sulexkya
    @sulexkya 10 років тому +2

    The Legend!!

  • @godvader5550
    @godvader5550 11 років тому

    I m just tring to find suggestions about where illusions ?

  • @damujen
    @damujen 5 років тому +9

    Satoshi Nashkamoto

  • @MissBurr1
    @MissBurr1 4 роки тому +20

    Dont it make you sick that they invite the great Dr.Nash, and immediately start talking about his weakness, instead of his greatness, and all he accomplished.

    • @boliussa
      @boliussa 4 роки тому +6

      you didn't understand the depth of the introduction, it wasn't talking about his weakness at all , it was talking about his strength and correcting a misconception.

    • @BeckBeckGo
      @BeckBeckGo 4 роки тому +1

      @@boliussa yes and this is true as well but they didn't even give a preamble to the actual subject. Which is just a basic academic courtesy. I suppose academia isn't used to somebody like this. I don't know.

    • @theovetscovers
      @theovetscovers Рік тому

      Hey guys, actually the speaker within the first few minutes of introduction made it clear that on their program broucher there is an extensive list of Dr. Nash’s accomplishments. That he didn’t want to bore the audience but rather engage then and talk about how he over came his own illness as a warm introduction

    • @Thomas-g6r5b
      @Thomas-g6r5b 5 місяців тому

      ​@@BeckBeckGomaybe it was all for the pharmaceutical benefits. Which is bullshit.

    • @therealcnn5346
      @therealcnn5346 21 день тому

      Typical human positivity…

  • @dailybread8295
    @dailybread8295 7 років тому +5

    Yesterday I watch the movie againBeautiful Mind with my daughter.. I prove to her that the movie is base real life and showed to her in google I was shocked knowing Prof. Nash and wife was dead in a car accident.R.I.P.

  • @marcusaurelius6607
    @marcusaurelius6607 2 роки тому +1

    skip to 6:20

  • @KulaGGin
    @KulaGGin 12 років тому +2

    Where is Russell Crowe?
    Interesting speech.

  • @StephenCRose
    @StephenCRose 4 роки тому +5

    Making him stand through the intro was not too swift.

  • @kellykitkat40
    @kellykitkat40 10 років тому +5

    Interesting. Between 3:50 and 5:00 we are
    told that the movie, Beautiful Mind, deliberately
    misrepresented the facts of John Nash's life,
    so that "they" might create a commercial to
    promote "the Mental Health Authority" as a
    legitimate policing agency, of the New World
    Order.
    There is a French proverb : The more
    things change, the more they stay the same.
    Treating "mental illness" with "antipsychotics"
    is a way of
    controlling prisoners (political dissidents in the
    Soviet Union were oft declared, mentally ill).
    Are not illlicit and allegedly dangerous drugs
    such as LSD, angeldust, PCP, and crack cocaine
    also classified the same as antipsychotics
    such as Risperdol and Olanzaene?
    Consider the Vatican ("Spanish") Inquisitions,
    where "they" desired to "know many", and how
    heretics were dealt with. Galileo Galilee was
    sentenced to house-arrest, and declared "mentally
    ill" for his pronouncement that the earth is a planet
    which travels around the sun. (He was wrong, of
    course, for the earth is not a planet, but relatively
    flat, with hills here and valleys there, but that is
    besides the point. The point is, for expressing his
    opinions, he was persecuted - called "mentally ill",
    or "heretic", or whatever the label was back then.)
    I think the movie, A Beautiful Mind, could have been
    a better movie if it had been truthful about how
    John Nash Jr. overcame mental illness with not
    only force of will, but by "concentrating on rightness",
    remaining logical, keeping his emotions in check, etc.
    It could have been a movie with a simple message :
    A little math now and then, will keep the mental
    illness away : This prescription, being in stark
    contrast to the "star search", song and dance,
    musical numbers young persons are encouraged
    to pursue. Oddly, "they" do seem to be discouraging
    the gangsta-rap genre.
    Of course, it is not paranoia, when they
    really are after you. No, it is "being safe".
    Rewriting the script would not be enough - for a catchy
    title helps draw them in : A Beautiful Mind, is a great
    title, speaking of something invisible - but does it really
    get across to people the threat to individual liberties
    the "mental health religion" poses? How about another
    title? : Tom Cruise was right about psychiatry. And
    Brooke Shields, wrong. .. Does that title work for you?
    Not too subtle, huh? No, I think "they" definitely got
    the title right.

    • @boliussa
      @boliussa 4 роки тому +1

      You write "Interesting. Between 3:50 and 5:00 we are
      told that the movie, Beautiful Mind, deliberately
      misrepresented the facts of John Nash's life,
      so that "they" might create a commercial to
      promote "the Mental Health Authority" as a
      legitimate policing agency, of the New World
      Order. "

    • @BeckBeckGo
      @BeckBeckGo 4 роки тому +2

      I think what happened there was the responsibility of keeping the mentally ill safe. Some can do without drugs, better even. But some people who are severely ill may do themselves a lot of harm if they're not properly cared for.
      In a lot of cases, psychiatric or neuroleptic drugs are not mysterious. They are like insulin. And until a better solution is found, they keep you alive. Literally, in many cases. Literally alive.
      I'm not suggesting the mental health care in some places is not a fuck-you, broke-ass system, because it is. But I don't think that has anything to do with what the producer was trying to do.

    • @paulkeeling6442
      @paulkeeling6442 Місяць тому

      Not another flat Earth nutter. How can You appear bright for a moment and then stupidly talk flatulence

  • @majahmed4059
    @majahmed4059 9 років тому +7

    its seems there a lot of accident happening-in our world....
    ....

  • @joshuakelly9743
    @joshuakelly9743 28 днів тому

    “When visiting Shenzhen in China recently as a tourist I was surprised to see a postal savings bank in existence there. And I later learned that at this time, the largest such national system is that in Japan.”
    Satoshi = wisdom
    Nakamoto = central
    Was the name of Bitcoin’s creator a nod to Japan’s wisdom with their postal savings bank?

    • @BassMarineBeatz
      @BassMarineBeatz 14 днів тому

      Are you the guy with the article commented in the other video ?

  • @PriceCollect-ey7xl
    @PriceCollect-ey7xl Рік тому

    Can we use internet on moon

  • @claudiohess7692
    @claudiohess7692 Рік тому

    He was reading all the time!!
    😮😮😮

  • @AJ-nb8ux
    @AJ-nb8ux 3 роки тому +1

    Legend

  • @chan400
    @chan400 7 днів тому

    Yes, Nash==Satoshi ❤❤

  • @godvader5550
    @godvader5550 11 років тому

    So goooood ...

  • @427vot
    @427vot 15 днів тому

    If you know a little about bitcoin and a little about Nash it is impossible to ignore the overlap. And if there is an overlap you can be sure this guy didn't play a "minor" role. His "prizes" are all pale in comparison to his emerging recognition as Satoshi Nakamoto, Long live The Prince of Peace.

  • @ImperialMisano
    @ImperialMisano 19 днів тому

    thanks nash for your Bitcoin !!!!!!

  • @partlysunnydk
    @partlysunnydk 9 років тому +11

    Hmmm....I always question death by accident.
    But, RIP.

  • @TheStudioManila
    @TheStudioManila 4 місяці тому

    13:35

  • @dionlindsay2
    @dionlindsay2 5 років тому +1

    Ridiculous that a modern university should have so many problems allowing questions to be heard on the stage - it must be embarrassing. And why not solvable?

  • @PriceCollect-ey7xl
    @PriceCollect-ey7xl Рік тому

    I am like you may be ,but your genius

  • @johnstfleur3987
    @johnstfleur3987 2 роки тому

    GOD.

  • @BlueAngel-ci9zm
    @BlueAngel-ci9zm Рік тому +1

    That men not crazy. They made him crazy

  • @andresbu
    @andresbu 10 днів тому

    he is satoshi nakamoto

  • @johnstfleur3987
    @johnstfleur3987 2 роки тому

    NUMBERS 23:19

  • @TommyLikeTom
    @TommyLikeTom 2 роки тому

    ah, Scranton, the electric city.... They call it that because of the electricity.

  • @lotus-chain
    @lotus-chain 22 дні тому

    Real #Satoshi ...

  • @mmateri
    @mmateri 4 місяці тому

    Ideal money is when i have more than you. It makes me a better person.

  • @ODexiko
    @ODexiko 10 років тому

    questions coming from the public, i have not understand it at all (bad sound quality)...answers from Nash, ware almost the same (well, hard to understand the point)...until i turned on the subs (wich is not that great made, and i was mostly confused)...all in all i dont know why i wasted time watching this video...oh yeah thats right,now i remember... he is the man from "Beautiful Mind"...well, i geuss, it was time worth spendig, cause that is one of the best movies i ever watched...ore is it maybe that just my english sux, oh i dont know im wery confused

  • @BeckBeckGo
    @BeckBeckGo 4 роки тому +2

    Money is tainted with this sense of immorality because it has no immediate value beyond trade. If I trade a cow for ten chickens, I'm getting ten chickens. That has a value that I can quantify. It's not just something tradable, it's also meat and eggs in its own right. Even gold or diamonds are only valuable because they're hard to find. That feels like an unstable value. So people don't trust it.
    The value of money (or anything whose only value is it's own trade value) is subject to a lot of arbitrary and unrelated impacts. A chicken is always as valuable as a chicken. Chickens are stable. Paper or elemental solids are not.

    • @bennichols1113
      @bennichols1113 2 роки тому

      the value of trade is inestimable. trade is a keystone of humanity. give you ten chickens for a cow in a bird flu epidemic any day. so products as a store of wealth have their own issues. the word value denotes a generalized quantability. applying a monetery value to goods and services is a much simpler system than having to relate everything back to chickens or cows. plus if you want to go to a concert and it costs 5 chickens or half a cow and you only have a cow, well how is Bessy going to feel about that. gold is gold, it stays as gold. a chicken turns into a bad smell and flies. chickens are not stable. there are zero chicken parts in your cellphone but there is gold. question, what is the value of ten chickens?

  • @AmyAmy-er8bp
    @AmyAmy-er8bp Рік тому

    Liquid Chlorofil. Make it available everywhere. A tak Zelen to je snimayet.

  • @locledang
    @locledang 12 років тому

    cool

  • @MrDoctorFog
    @MrDoctorFog 9 років тому +5

    Unfortunately nowday the genius John Nash is still too far from the ignorance of the average people... and the fucking and deadly capitalistic philosophy...
    You were one of the most genius person in the second half of the last centuryJohn...
    RIP

    • @Tenebrousable
      @Tenebrousable Рік тому

      Capitalism provides you everything you got. Government, with moneyprinting or otherwise, take it away. Capitalism offers you goods, because you value them more than the money you trade for it. Government just takes your money, and gives pennies in return, mmaybe. Local government is always the most deadly thief in any geo location.

  • @favorednation34
    @favorednation34 6 років тому +1

    he is reading this.... this is not his work..... sad. he was a great man

  • @charlescunningham1872
    @charlescunningham1872 6 років тому +1

    Pretty bad presentation but good ideas

  • @paulstokes5264
    @paulstokes5264 7 років тому +1

    Bleeding ordinary and boring - really high school concepts ...

  • @iwilrage
    @iwilrage 2 роки тому

    No no no....he is brilliant but reading slides is worst thing ever

  • @pashazafar3490
    @pashazafar3490 7 років тому

    Not good explaining things to people.

  • @AmyAmy-er8bp
    @AmyAmy-er8bp Рік тому

    all they had was horse dose of diarrhea drug. @Gluxd pokem.