Hyundai is already a powerhouse in the ship building industry I do not doubt they can build a carrier even a super carrier given the opportunity. I guess their industrial capacity may play quite an important part is taking down prices and getting ships being build quickly. (top views are great ideas, straight down from the car industry obviously)
@@kfx3907 Yes Korea is very very small! Koreans are often regarded as Chinese when they go abroad, and some countries in other parts of the world don’t even know that there is such a country as “Korea”
Cool i think it will take years company to be totally recognise as one of leading rule for naval solution provider in any naval country that wants to procure cheap,reliable ship.
South Korea's Defense Industry is Growing Rapidly, I could see them easily become one of the alternatives to some of the more expensive US Defense Systems. I think the US should look seriously at buying some of the New Korean Fighters... or produce under license rather than developing a whole new gen 4.5 fighter, not that they will, if Sig Sauer wins the New army rifle bid US contractors will throw a shit fit, I can only imagine what Lockheed and GE would do if the US bought a foreign aircraft.
I'd got a hunch that HHI will offer their HDP-1500 OPV model to the Philippine Navy's OPV project, a year after it was selected against Austal's and ASFAT OPV designs that even offered 'transfer of technology'. HHI really knows how to play the game in the Philippines.
Eh... Even I can see HHI carrier will be more expensive than DSME... HHI actually offering full carrier than light carrier, light carrier is actually similar to Amphibious Assault Ship/Helicopter carrier, with the exception it can't actually carry tank, and carry more plane instead. It's gonna be interesting to see which one will be adopted by SK navy.
both are light carriers. to be a full/fleet carrier you have to be capable of takeoff and recovery at the same time. HHI layout does not allow for it. at 30000ton, it is only half the size of modern fleet carrier operated by UK and China.
@@lagrangewei You actually forgot the intended aircraft to be operated is STOVL, nevermind able to take off and recovery at the same time, it can launch and recover more than 5 plane at the same time.
I would love to see Hyundai's CVX carrier being operated in ROKN in the future. Compared to DSME's design it looks more appealing. Ski jump and drone landing dock looks essential. But one thing that I am disappointed about the current South Korean Carrier program is that the size is relatively small compared to British Queen Elizabeth II. I hope the ROKN could maximise the size of the current 30000tonnes to 70000tonnes. Also, they can consider to install CATOBAR in the carrier.
@@seenyouyt6885 it is delayed because of the pandemic . but i think korea has a good chance of getting the contract for atleast 4 instead of 6 austal ships
What a big surprise! Reading many comments on the MaxDefense Facebook, I felt Filipinos love Western weapons so much and also believe that every Western weapon is unquestioningly best from every aspect for the Philippines while they belittle Korean weapons so much and treat them like shit, so I thought Filipinos blindly want only Western weapons.
This aircraft carrier is very suitable for ASEAN market especially to be operated at South China Sea which is known for shallow waters. Its quite impossible for 60k Ton and above vessels could effectively sailed in this domain. Philipines, Malaysia, and Indonesia could be potential buyer. If Malaysia agreed to buy Korea LCA, it might procure it first aircraft carrier in the next military budget.
The CVX concept and HDP-1500neo proves Hyundai can design very capable and competitive ships if you have the money to pay for it. After the debacle with the Jose Rizal-class and removal of a respected Flag Officer from the PN. Hyundai Heavy Industries and Hanwha Systems dosen't deserve to win the Philippine Corvette Acqusition Program.
This appears to be an advertisement for a 30 year old design concept which, if actually engaged in conflict, would amount to a very large surface target.
The Smart Solutions sound the most interesting to me honestly. Already saw the CVX from your previous video so wasn't too focused on that. Quite skeptical on the trimaran as it sounds very similar to the Independence class LCS which was honestly a bit of a failure. It is smaller so probably less sunk cost if it fails too??? Maybe? HHI seem to really pushing for the USV implementation on its platforms.
Carrier is Brilliant! Purchase n operating cost of that n naval Gripen E/Fs would be Much less than f35bs on assault carrier . Capability would be Far better too!
That is really good advice, or the Japanese w/ their new Lithium Ion tech regarding the sub. Also, Australia and the US should consider using their new factory in Subic Bay PH to build a shared small feet vessel jointly, maybe donating one of every 10 to the Philippines as compensation. Joint US and Australian tech w/ Filipino labor should be able to undercut the price and outperform these S. Korean options while investing in an indispensable Ally.
Don't count on it, politicians will rather burn a mountain of others people money before admiting a mistake, Aussies are stuck with the french subs I am afraid.
As you see now, the design is different from western design. More simple and probably better, Asian people is very good in improving things. Western world will have difficulty to keeping up with Asia in the future
Keeping up? Our new Gerald R Ford class Aircraft carrier is already ahead of the rest of the world. That being said, there shouldn’t be a need for the western world to keep up with Asia, China, Russia, and the US would never think about going to war, the world economy would collapse, everyone would lose no matter who stands out on top
Our Asian friends are making great strides in Maritime capabilities. There seems to be much interest in anti-Mine tech. (not a critique) S. Korea seems to be better at communicating in English. I am surprised at how bad the Japanese are. I am very glad they are one of our best friends though.
Korean Carrier look impressive, it seem like doesn't have Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System (EMALS) like Gerald R Ford class has but I think computer system more advance than HMS Queen Elizabeth
Navantia in Spain is #1 in military ships. Since XIV Century until now Spain has gone farther than any othe nation on the sea. Just check the naval achivements of Spain, its prime contractor.
S Korea need 60,000 ton carrier to use KF21. In long run, money spent on it will stay within S Korea for jobs for maintenance which cost more than buying fighter and ship. Also bigger deck is safer to operate thus even UK didn't want to go back to small carrier with VSTOL type aircraft after operating 3 VSTOL small aircraft carriers. Larger carrier with catapult system will have more fire power than 3 Chinese aircraft carrier with ski jump which their fighters can't fly with anti ship missiles due to weight. Also ski jump carriers have to go full speed for lift off fighters thus if their engine has problem, their aircraft can not fly.
the Indian Navy needs large (CTOL) aircraft carrier displacing in excess of 65,000 ton!!! based on the HYUNDAI Naval Shipbuilding CVX concept the IN can procure a fleet of three state-of-the-art 124,000 ton (146,000 ton loaded) stealth (CTOL) super carrier & powered by a new cutting edge bio fuel cell & i-HYBRID marine propulsion system!!! approx unit cost no more than €5.6 Bn - €6.3 Bn!!! India's private sector will provide full funding to acquire the stealth (CTOL) super carriers!!! and lease it back to the Indian Navy!!! this way the IN can have the best in the business without having to break the treasury!!!
@@100everytime your right!!! but I never said IN would buy three super carriers because it would be too expensive for them!!! I said about leasing out new aircraft carriers to the Indian Navy!!! the INS Vikramaditya has been bleeding the Indian treasury even before it was rebuilt for the IN!!! India's private sector has the capability to fulfill our defense needs!!! no foreign funding & no foreign grants!!! if your wondering why will the private sector help Indian Armed Forces!!! give me one good reason why they won't!!! Sir, I'm from the private sector since the past 18 yrs I know what I'm talking about!!! and by the way STOBAR or STOL aircraft carrier!!! remember back in the 1970s the IN operated a CTOL aircraft carrier INS Vikrant (R11)!!! during a refit of the aircraft carrier the foremost part of front bow section flight deck was replaced with a ski jump to accommodate the new carrier borne AV-8B Sea Harrier II VTOL multi role ground attack fighter!!! as a result INS Vikrant (R11) from a CATOBAR aircraft carrier was turned into a STOBAR aircraft carrier!!! for the Indian Navy a CATOBAR or CTOL aircraft carrier makes more tactical sense in a real combat theatre than any STOL aircraft carrier!!! ask any IN officer should you know someone in the navy!!! CATOBAR always has the tactical edge over STOBAR, always!!! STOBAR is nothing more than a economical option for navies who cannot afford a 60,000 ton CATOBAR aircraft carrier!!! one more thing carrier borne VTOL fighter jets can operate from CATOBAR aircraft carrier but CTOL fighter jets cannot operate from STOBAR aircraft carrier without major modifications & upgrades!!!
I don't understand the thought process behind building "light carriers" They cost a "LOT" OF MONEY, You may as well build a full sized carrier and get more bang for your buck...light carriers are very limited in what they can provide and do...full sized carriers can go in harms way and bring a lot of grief in a short amount of time to an aggressor, and make potential opponents think long and hard about the consequences of messing with the wrong country.
HDP-1500 is Offshore Patrol Vessel. OPV is aimed for lowering the price (so high speed and heavy weapones are not considered) with high habitability and long operating period on offshore.
I know it's like Japanese vessels calling destroyer class as frigate and helicopter carrier as destroyer. Just try not to make provocative for neighbor countries. Lowering down the actual name is another tactic.
@@dennythedavinchi3832 The Japanese don't call destroyers frigates though. But the helicopter carrier part is true. Although to be fair, Japanese helicopter carriers had a lineage from destroyers with a large helicopter deck at the stern such as the Shirane and Haruna classes. Think of the Ise-class back in WW2 or the Soviet Moskva class. Eventually the Japanese made a full length deck with the Hyuga albeit still with a decent amount of VLS... before going full blown helicopter carrier on the Izumo if it hasn't already with the Hyuga.
@@nkrihargamati5165 lah video nya ada satu pun bahas pindad masih mending, Ini gak ada bahas pindad satupun jadi gk cocok, Lagipula pindad gk bikin kapal itu tugas nya PT PAL
@@90enemies us carrier wieght 100k tons ... Its not particularly a bad thing cause its a light aircraft carrier but from its design its a desiel engine not a nuclear meaning it cost higher than a nuclear... Yes bigger is better compare to small (•ω•)
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #60 РОЖДЕНИЕ ЛОЛОЛОШКИ [Финал] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YoR0pAV9FVQ/mqdefault.jpg)
Hyundai is already a powerhouse in the ship building industry I do not doubt they can build a carrier even a super carrier given the opportunity. I guess their industrial capacity may play quite an important part is taking down prices and getting ships being build quickly.
(top views are great ideas, straight down from the car industry obviously)
他们能制造电磁弹射器吗？
yes，Koreans build ships so fast that they can build a 10000tons destroyer within a year
I Agree we need to have consultants from them in our design and construction efforts at every level. If they wish to cooperate.
excellents continues to modernized more the arm forces of the philippines-south korea...........✊✊✊✊✊✊✊✊
Congratulation HHI for being selected I think for the OPV project of Philippine Navy, still not sure cause the contract hasn't sign yet.
That aircraft carrier is beautiful I’m curious to see what country could Afford such a vessel
Murica and China only!!
Lol south Korea is rich country and there defence budget is 48 billion dollars they can afford it
@@allex2451
Communist China!! 😄😅😂🤣😆
@@rampage4695 no they couldn’t, look at their navy’s budget and add maintenance cost along with upgrades
@@hanzsolo5460 Their defence budget ranks eighth in the world and they are increasing their defence budgets every year.
Korea's shipbuilding industry is the world's #1 and with the cooperation of the UK, a really great aircraft carrier was born.
Because South Korea is a small country So you can only see these in the photos！They don't have the technology to make these
@@bieke780 they are small but terrible.. A small piece of sand can blind you
They are only showing initial models but means of technological prowess is possess by largest weapons industries from the west.
@@bieke780 You really think that South Korea is a small country? Lmao
@@kfx3907 Yes Korea is very very small! Koreans are often regarded as Chinese when they go abroad, and some countries in other parts of the world don’t even know that there is such a country as “Korea”
those ships will get new facelift every 5 years, like hyundai car..😎🎉
Ji
King hyundai, also choose the facelift of korean president
Maybe, as ships also rely on aerodynamics.
Cool i think it will take years company to be totally recognise as one of leading rule for naval solution provider in any naval country that wants to procure cheap,reliable ship.
Sexy ships hope to see some of them in the open sea soon!
Bravo Hyundai Korean powerful.
The good thing about these Koreans is that they DO NOT COPY unlike it’s giant neighbor . High quality made unlike it’s copying neighbor .
South Korea needs a carrier.
South Korea's Defense Industry is Growing Rapidly, I could see them easily become one of the alternatives to some of the more expensive US Defense Systems. I think the US should look seriously at buying some of the New Korean Fighters... or produce under license rather than developing a whole new gen 4.5 fighter, not that they will, if Sig Sauer wins the New army rifle bid US contractors will throw a shit fit, I can only imagine what Lockheed and GE would do if the US bought a foreign aircraft.
I'd got a hunch that HHI will offer their HDP-1500 OPV model to the Philippine Navy's OPV project, a year after it was selected against Austal's and ASFAT OPV designs that even offered 'transfer of technology'.
HHI really knows how to play the game in the Philippines.
Yes I 👍💯
I ENJOYED WATCHING MADEX THANKS NAVAL NEWS WE FILIPINO SALUTE TO OUR BROTHER KOREA.
This should be a joint purchase with South Korea Japan and possibly Australia 1 for each country
Eh... Even I can see HHI carrier will be more expensive than DSME... HHI actually offering full carrier than light carrier, light carrier is actually similar to Amphibious Assault Ship/Helicopter carrier, with the exception it can't actually carry tank, and carry more plane instead.
It's gonna be interesting to see which one will be adopted by SK navy.
both are light carriers. to be a full/fleet carrier you have to be capable of takeoff and recovery at the same time. HHI layout does not allow for it. at 30000ton, it is only half the size of modern fleet carrier operated by UK and China.
@@lagrangewei You actually forgot the intended aircraft to be operated is STOVL, nevermind able to take off and recovery at the same time, it can launch and recover more than 5 plane at the same time.
I would love to see Hyundai's CVX carrier being operated in ROKN in the future. Compared to DSME's design it looks more appealing. Ski jump and drone landing dock looks essential. But one thing that I am disappointed about the current South Korean Carrier program is that the size is relatively small compared to British Queen Elizabeth II. I hope the ROKN could maximise the size of the current 30000tonnes to 70000tonnes. Also, they can consider to install CATOBAR in the carrier.
I think that would push it beyond the kind of budget they could afford.
The MGPeruvian forgot choice the OPV HDP-1500 NEO HYUNDAI HEAVY INDUSTRIES and the Frigate HHI-3200 !!
Hmm. I find the implication of autonomous ASW patrol drones interesting.
I bet money that when testing they torpedo a whale. Or accidentally attempt to
I think the philippine navy opv project eill go to hhi instead of austal
Yes they should go with HHI instead but it will depend if South Korea is willing to provide the funds.
That means more & more delays
@@watermirror it's delayed anyway with Australia because of duterte's war on drugs
@@seenyouyt6885 it is delayed because of the pandemic . but i think korea has a good chance of getting the contract for atleast 4 instead of 6 austal ships
What a big surprise! Reading many comments on the MaxDefense Facebook, I felt Filipinos love Western weapons so much and also believe that every Western weapon is unquestioningly best from every aspect for the Philippines while they belittle Korean weapons so much and treat them like shit, so I thought Filipinos blindly want only Western weapons.
Weak nation before but today South Korea becoming more stronger in military capabilities
Well done Korea 🇰🇷
This aircraft carrier is very suitable for ASEAN market especially to be operated at South China Sea which is known for shallow waters. Its quite impossible for 60k Ton and above vessels could effectively sailed in this domain. Philipines, Malaysia, and Indonesia could be potential buyer. If Malaysia agreed to buy Korea LCA, it might procure it first aircraft carrier in the next military budget.
God that's some fever dream you have there
garatz korean brothers love you from Turkey.
Philippines first customer again to buy 6 HDP-1500 Neo.
With crew tagging, it’ll provide security for identify pirates on board.
Advertising like a family SUV. So how much is the down payment?
Wow ,aircraft carrier with uav n usv
yes, it's very innovative
The CVX concept and HDP-1500neo proves Hyundai can design very capable and competitive ships if you have the money to pay for it.
After the debacle with the Jose Rizal-class and removal of a respected Flag Officer from the PN. Hyundai Heavy Industries and Hanwha Systems dosen't deserve to win the Philippine Corvette Acqusition Program.
This appears to be an advertisement for a 30 year old design concept which, if actually engaged in conflict, would amount to a very large surface target.
That HPD-Neo 1500 OPV has already been selected by Philippine Navy fór their OPV acquisition project...
The Smart Solutions sound the most interesting to me honestly. Already saw the CVX from your previous video so wasn't too focused on that. Quite skeptical on the trimaran as it sounds very similar to the Independence class LCS which was honestly a bit of a failure. It is smaller so probably less sunk cost if it fails too??? Maybe? HHI seem to really pushing for the USV implementation on its platforms.
Hyndai is one step upgrade air crab carrier It's nice model !
Hyunda ship similar to royal navy ship it is QUEEN ELIZABETH
QE is a much larger ship.
Babcock are working with HHI, so the similarities to the UK's QE Class aircraft carrier isn't a surprise.
4:07 21kts? it will be like a duck in the ocean
Tell us more about the "lazer gun" under development. A few nations have them under development like the US and Israel.
Turkey has already made it and tasted it on drones
@@clashgamerlabique they destroyed a Chinese drone use by UAE
@@masoodansari2710 who
@@clashgamerlabique Turkey
im pretty sure russia has lazers already in use. im not 100% sure though
I love korean shipyard like,Hyundai,Hanjin,Samsung
i wish the nort end south korea come together that would be a power greatings from serbia
애고... 안스러워라~~ 보고 읽는게 보이네..ㅋㅋ 하지만 CVX컨셉은 참 마음에 든다... 여기에 원자로엔진을넣었으면 조겠다!!
아쉽지만 원자력 추진은 경하 7만톤 건조 이후에....
@@shipoftheline0416 idiot😂
여자직원 예정없던 외국인 인터뷰 하면서 눈동자 흔들리는거 맴찢이네 ㅋㅋㅋ
Fantastic amazing Nice 👍 design
NICE HYUNDAI CARRIER.
why should there be a heliped drone at the stern if it can land on the top deck?
doesn't that add to the cost?
for more operation area for aircraft to take off and landing because this carrier did not have angled deck
Those are some cool looking ships.
Carrier is Brilliant!
Purchase n operating cost of that n naval Gripen E/Fs would be Much less than f35bs on assault carrier .
Capability would be Far better too!
But i didn't see any aircraft catapults on the deck, maybe they planned to use only vtol jets
@@manhcuong3035 If it doesn’t have catapults the capabilities wouldn’t be superior, they would be significantly inferior.
@@matthewhuszarik4173 ok well said
There isn't a naval Gripen though. Lots of folk hoping for one but someone will have to bite the bullet & fund it.
@@gregs7562 arent the brazilians developing it jointly with saab?
Wasnt this the clincher on why brazil selected gripen ng?
HHI should consider bidding to build Submarines for Australia. The French Maginot sub deal might kicked out any day soon.
That is really good advice, or the Japanese w/ their new Lithium Ion tech regarding the sub. Also, Australia and the US should consider using their new factory in Subic Bay PH to build a shared small feet vessel jointly, maybe donating one of every 10 to the Philippines as compensation. Joint US and Australian tech w/ Filipino labor should be able to undercut the price and outperform these S. Korean options while investing in an indispensable Ally.
Don't count on it, politicians will rather burn a mountain of others people money before admiting a mistake, Aussies are stuck with the french subs I am afraid.
Good luck Korea!
You see that jutting out of the flight deck on the port side? That angled cut on the rear? Yeah they totally wanted to make this a CTOL carrier.
hpd-1500 neo Philippines' next OPVs
What will happen to those declined prototypes?
Find the difference of 1950s South korea vs nowadays South korea. Well done 👍
Replacing machine guns with drone launchers is cool
What coast the ship models? Cant afford the real deal but i like one of the models :)
Yeah...
All good until the check engine light comes on.
Nice !
HCX is like USS independense
Your carrier is nice except forward bow of the ships de same as china and British carrier I suggest you design carrier as same as us carrier bow
phil.navy must have all and ph pcg
As you see now, the design is different from western design. More simple and probably better, Asian people is very good in improving things. Western world will have difficulty to keeping up with Asia in the future
Keeping up? Our new Gerald R Ford class Aircraft carrier is already ahead of the rest of the world. That being said, there shouldn’t be a need for the western world to keep up with Asia, China, Russia, and the US would never think about going to war, the world economy would collapse, everyone would lose no matter who stands out on top
Not to sound rude but do a little research first
It's just a copy of Queen Elizabeth
Our Asian friends are making great strides in Maritime capabilities. There seems to be much interest in anti-Mine tech. (not a critique) S. Korea seems to be better at communicating in English. I am surprised at how bad the Japanese are. I am very glad they are one of our best friends though.
Great ships.....Gangnam style.
Korean Carrier look impressive, it seem like doesn't have Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System (EMALS) like Gerald R Ford class has but I think computer system more advance than HMS Queen Elizabeth
You can find nothing else about the ships on Wikipedia or anywhere online
They are designs, not physical reality yet.
what kind of scenario would they practice for where this would be a vital asset? I can't think of any.
for market export
India can consider some of these ................
Navantia in Spain is #1 in military ships. Since XIV Century until now Spain has gone farther than any othe nation on the sea. Just check the naval achivements of Spain, its prime contractor.
Hyundai shows the the new feature with free. But, Daewoo has expressed showing model What happened it?
I hope it's not rotten corruption.
So cool
S Korea need 60,000 ton carrier to use KF21. In long run, money spent on it will stay within S Korea for jobs for maintenance which cost more than buying fighter and ship. Also bigger deck is safer to operate thus even UK didn't want to go back to small carrier with VSTOL type aircraft after operating 3 VSTOL small aircraft carriers. Larger carrier with catapult system will have more fire power than 3 Chinese aircraft carrier with ski jump which their fighters can't fly with anti ship missiles due to weight. Also ski jump carriers have to go full speed for lift off fighters thus if their engine has problem, their aircraft can not fly.
Maybe someday the latest modern will be our from this company
Hyundai isn't ordinary car Company 😂
Korea I believe you and you can do it..
항모외관은 괜찮그먄 ㅋ
한반도 주변 상황을 고려했을때
만재배수량 7만톤이상
핵추진방식
캐터펄트 스토블방식
어레스팅 와이어
앵글덱 만들어야 되지않을까~~~^^
조기경보기 띄어야함.
the Indian Navy needs large (CTOL) aircraft carrier displacing in excess of 65,000 ton!!! based on the HYUNDAI Naval Shipbuilding CVX concept the IN can procure a fleet of three state-of-the-art 124,000 ton (146,000 ton loaded) stealth (CTOL) super carrier & powered by a new cutting edge bio fuel cell & i-HYBRID marine propulsion system!!! approx unit cost no more than €5.6 Bn - €6.3 Bn!!! India's private sector will provide full funding to acquire the stealth (CTOL) super carriers!!! and lease it back to the Indian Navy!!! this way the IN can have the best in the business without having to break the treasury!!!
@@100everytime your right!!! but I never said IN would buy three super carriers because it would be too expensive for them!!! I said about leasing out new aircraft carriers to the Indian Navy!!! the INS Vikramaditya has been bleeding the Indian treasury even before it was rebuilt for the IN!!! India's private sector has the capability to fulfill our defense needs!!! no foreign funding & no foreign grants!!! if your wondering why will the private sector help Indian Armed Forces!!! give me one good reason why they won't!!! Sir, I'm from the private sector since the past 18 yrs I know what I'm talking about!!! and by the way STOBAR or STOL aircraft carrier!!! remember back in the 1970s the IN operated a CTOL aircraft carrier INS Vikrant (R11)!!! during a refit of the aircraft carrier the foremost part of front bow section flight deck was replaced with a ski jump to accommodate the new carrier borne AV-8B Sea Harrier II VTOL multi role ground attack fighter!!! as a result INS Vikrant (R11) from a CATOBAR aircraft carrier was turned into a STOBAR aircraft carrier!!! for the Indian Navy a CATOBAR or CTOL aircraft carrier makes more tactical sense in a real combat theatre than any STOL aircraft carrier!!! ask any IN officer should you know someone in the navy!!! CATOBAR always has the tactical edge over STOBAR, always!!! STOBAR is nothing more than a economical option for navies who cannot afford a 60,000 ton CATOBAR aircraft carrier!!! one more thing carrier borne VTOL fighter jets can operate from CATOBAR aircraft carrier but CTOL fighter jets cannot operate from STOBAR aircraft carrier without major modifications & upgrades!!!
The ships will have a great warranty and high resale value. 😬
We need RF Nemesis
Brillant
Hope PH will....
Austal MRV-80 vs Hyundai HCX-21
Nah it's more like Austal MRV-80 vs HDP-1500
Hyundia can not even makes a simple card let along making war games vehicles. Properly causes a lot of issue and incidents explosion etc.
Cutting- …………….edge
ㅎㅎ 뭔말인가 했습니다 사장님 ㅋㅋㅋ
looks like the British hms Hyundai
Solid
a straight centerline deck carrier? wat.
I don't understand the thought process behind building "light carriers" They cost a "LOT" OF MONEY, You may as well build a full sized carrier and get more bang for your buck...light carriers are very limited in what they can provide and do...full sized carriers can go in harms way and bring a lot of grief in a short amount of time to an aggressor, and make potential opponents think long and hard about the consequences of messing with the wrong country.
gooddjob Korsel..salam indonesian.
Nice
Ok i wan't to order 12pcs every one of kind's of ship sens to me how much all down payment pls queckly send to phillipines😝
21knots is slow speed for warship., Almost warship or Aircraft Carrier are maximum of 29knots.
Actually all US warships are all rated to do 30+ knots, which in real world figures is ~35+- knots.
HDP-1500 is Offshore Patrol Vessel. OPV is aimed for lowering the price (so high speed and heavy weapones are not considered) with high habitability and long operating period on offshore.
Its not a light aircraft carrier...
I know it's like Japanese vessels calling destroyer class as frigate and helicopter carrier as destroyer. Just try not to make provocative for neighbor countries. Lowering down the actual name is another tactic.
@@dennythedavinchi3832 The Japanese don't call destroyers frigates though. But the helicopter carrier part is true. Although to be fair, Japanese helicopter carriers had a lineage from destroyers with a large helicopter deck at the stern such as the Shirane and Haruna classes. Think of the Ise-class back in WW2 or the Soviet Moskva class. Eventually the Japanese made a full length deck with the Hyuga albeit still with a decent amount of VLS... before going full blown helicopter carrier on the Izumo if it hasn't already with the Hyuga.
Australia and Germany are building 9,000 and 10,000 ton frigates
Top
Great photoshop work!
Australia had better look into HHI offerings, work with HHI get their ships fully integrated into NATO standards.
I suggest that Communist China should buy the company shares of the manufacturer.
Maybe they already have.
你对中国的实力一无所知
well if Japan and China both have carriers now, it is only natural for Korea to have carriers as well.
F-35B를 믿어야할까?
Love u pindad indonesia
Ini hyundai kocak,
Apa hubungannya ama pindad 🤣🤣🤣
@@thatoneperson6969 lah masalah buat kamu...gua cinta produk alutsista dalam negri .
@@nkrihargamati5165 lah video nya ada satu pun bahas pindad masih mending,
Ini gak ada bahas pindad satupun jadi gk cocok,
Lagipula pindad gk bikin kapal itu tugas nya PT PAL
@@thatoneperson6969 lah terus apa urusan yH kamu komen dikolom saya
@@nkrihargamati5165 hanya memberitahu
Kim Jong Un might consider to order some.
Show case never sell
Advertisement = international aircraft carrier 😲😲
Reality check = 30,000 tons aircraft carrier 🤭
Because it's light
Is that a bad thing or a good thing? Is heavier/bigger better?
@@90enemies us carrier wieght 100k tons ... Its not particularly a bad thing cause its a light aircraft carrier but from its design its a desiel engine not a nuclear meaning it cost higher than a nuclear... Yes bigger is better compare to small (•ω•)
korea should deceive it because of china and japan..
Korea