This is the link to the 1891 Lecture of Nikola Tesla, which is discussed in this video: magstar.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/1891-lecture-New-York-Columbia-college.pdf All pictures are included, but the numbering is -100 so instead of fig. 129 in the video, in the book it is fig. 29 This is because this is the original released lecture
@@emichael06 the flyback has the diode, it rectifies the ac high voltage into dc. A zvs also has diodes but they have other functions, you can look it up.
Ivo, this by far has been my favorite video. I can see the light bulb moments going off in your head and it is exciting to watch. I greatly appreciate this long format video. Although I'm sure longer videos get less views, I really really appreciate your labor and efforts. Best regards. And I love the VR too btw...I'm a visual learner so it helps a lot.
30:01 This might be why certain inventions with spark gaps can develop frosted tips on them, or why some circuits can actually cool the wires as opposed to heating them: electrostatic implosions and explosions sweeping away the energy with them, giving a cooling effect!
@CheyenneChild I would love to be able to get these electric cooling effects. the conductor with capacity probably needs a very fast negative voltage discharge (to zero volt). but it is easy to miss. altough I often wonder why my mosfets stay so cool. I wish I had a permanent on IR camera...
@@Gnaritas42Nice BS. Lenz's law can easily be circumvented with partnered output coils parallel with each other using a single loop core where the primary winding envelops both of them as a solenoid.
Do you really think that the control freaks would allow freedom at all? We're talking about the clash of the classes(elite vs mortals) here! That's the right dividing line!the worst ever motivation is money because it leads to division!
@Ivo I wanted to share a story with you that your video reminded me of. Back around 2011, I attended an energy conference in Southern Maryland, hosted by Larry Jarboe (presentations from that event are on UA-cam, but not the one I'm about to share). It was there that I witnessed an extraordinary demonstration by Carl Falsenis, which left a lasting impact on me. Carl's demonstration featured a variant of the hairpin circuit, connected to a series of eight spark gaps that crackled with energy. This circuit also incorporated a mysterious bottle that had been evacuated and sealed through an intricate process involving bee pollen and some kind of vinegar solution, a detail Carl mentioned but kept mostly secret. In the dimly lit room, about 15 of us watched in awe as Carl activated the circuit. A mesmerizing purple mist began to pour into the bottle, like a breach in the fabric of space itself. The mist was deep and vibrant, yet also dull and spectral, almost ghostly as it floated in the darkness. The true marvel of the demonstration occurred when the bottle was brought near my hand. The same purple mist seemed to be pulled from my skin, as though the bottle was siphoning the very essence of energy from my body. The mist, which had appeared ghostly when held in the darkness, became much brighter near my hand. It was as if there was more energy density, more of the purple substance, being pulled from my skin. The sensation was intensely cold, as if the energy itself was being extracted. This eerie process was not only felt but seen, with the energy manifesting as a plasma-like purple mist, following the fluid dynamics of a mist or fog. The mist appeared to emanate out of space itself, seemingly pulling energy from the very fabric of reality, and drawing an even larger degree of energy from living beings. This was evident when it was near a human hand, as the mist became far more vibrant and intense. Having researched Tesla's circuits extensively, I was familiar with the principles at play, but I had never seen anything like this. Yet, despite my familiarity, I was unable to replicate the circuit. Carl was unwilling to provide the details, show the schematics, or explain the exact steps he used to prepare and seal the evacuated bottle. There were proprietary steps that he kept secret. Your video brought these vivid memories back to the forefront of my mind, and I felt compelled to share this extraordinary experience with you. If you ever wish to delve deeper into these intriguing phenomena, please do not hesitate to reach out.
That sounds amazing, I would love to witness it. No doubt the bottle was near vacuum, with just a little gas inside. Tesla's 1891 lecture mostly refered to producing light, so I advise you to read it!
That's amazing! I'm not sure if it's related but in the early days of Eric Dollard's work he experimented with evacuated bulbs of a specific type of old street light that had burned out with evaporated metals inside. When energized in a monopolar field between 2 Tesla extra coils a purple plasma like mist started to form inside the bulb followed by galaxy like structures, sometimes the bulbs would breach with a hole but rather than loose their vacuum it got stronger as the purple mist flowed out of it, other times the whole thing would explode and the galaxy would remain without its container for a second or two, I wonder if Carl's experiment and this are related?
Key thing is to decouple the source exciter from the load side. That way, the load doesn't pull from the source side but from the ambient field itself.
Time 16:00 high voltage takes on a carrier frequency. Think magnetron resonance chamber. The microwave produced has the frequency set by the chamber of the magnetron.
Got interested in all of this again since I am older now and have money to experiment, do it as a hobby. Been researching for a couple of months and building coils and playing around. Gotta say, this VR demonstration is by far, the best way for me to understand and visualise what is going on. Great job with the video and everything! Thank you.
you need the bedini voltage spike or potential to fill the capacitor. You have to work on the other side of accepted energy. It is high voltage spikes.
I have seen 4 places in the world where 3 energy balls float around looking for spires. When the energy ball touches the spire, the town lights go on, the whole town. WEF our enemy destroying as much as possible.
Tesla said his best Tesla Coil was the static powered Tesla Coil, he had a paper belt running over a think was a rubber roller at top and a glass roller at the bottom, that ran up the center of the HV coil, with a brass collector wire that rubs on the flat surface of the paper very lightly. If you look up home made static generator you should find out the best materials to use.
High voltage needs distance with the paper in the center and the electrostatic turns to charge. In fact the charge is so strong the paper will weigh (in force) 4-6x as much. I did a video on it. It also used 2 dc flybacks to produce the electrostatic effect. As you reduce the amps the frequency and voltage increases. 2 simple circuits can do the same thing. A trigger switch and a frequency generator with a duty cycle. Tesla was right on this one.
Karl Palsness was trying to get me to understand this two decades ago when he was working with the hairpin circuit. This is also related to other research such as the "water fuel cell" where we have unipolar pulses of high potential.
On the topic of WFC's a vital element not talked about enough IMO is the use of Nitrogen, Meyer used an air intake to add the atmospheric Nitrogen to the Hydrogen mix to slow the rate of combustion to make it usable as a fuel, I seldom see people talk about this vital information. As for running the fuel cell, spot on, it helps if there's no conductive contact between the - and + electrodes.
@@JenkoRun Absolutely. Good points. I used distilled water. I suppose all of this relates to the PROTELF system as well Where we have a high voltage unipolar discharge across a tungsten/carbon gap with alignment field (b-field). Thereby ejecting energy outwards at 90 degrees to the current flow. This system being well tested at lower voltages, but not high voltage which may transform the equation.
Thank you for this video. This is the best use of VR on UA-cam. I would love to see 3D VR shorts detailing each concept. Us viewers can then walk around each model as you sketch them. Please don't ever get discouraged.
Tariel Kapanadze,foi o que me veio a mente, parece ter relação e pode ser a chave, hoje em dia temos inteligencia artificial para nos auxiliar na compreensão do trabalho de Nikola Tesla e no Original de Maxwell 👍Parabéns ao Mestre Ivo por tanta dedicação e esforço ao longo deste anos...👍
If it weren't for me being so swamped as of late I would have commented sooner on this magnificent video. It compelled me to not only go back and re read this specific Tesla lecture but his other famous ones with scrutiny. I would like to ask however what would you consider to be the bear amount of current needed from the initial source to create these effects, I know high voltage is of course the key to get the disruptive discharge but of course this would have to be accompanied with a certain threshold of current though very much less than from the initial source (such as we see in a step up transformer which is usually used to get the High voltage needed). That being said thank you once again for the the dearth of knowledge you continue to provide.
Thanks! well, it is not the common type of current. Tesla often speaks about current, but he knew very well there are different types of currents. Often called Tesla currents, what he spoke of were displacement currents, so these currents are depended on the capacity of the conductors. If the chnaged in voltage is quick enough through a conductor, it won't make a magnetic (vortex) current, but instead a longitudinal dielectric displacement current (perpendicular to the conductor). I once calculated the discharge current of a capacitor, and it was really high due to the short amount of time. So I made a parallel switch to be able to handle the current. but to my surprise the mosfets stayed fairly cool. Later I even used single mosfets with higher Rds and still it worked fine. This proves to me Pure voltage sees no resistance, only (slow) magnetic current produces the heat in conductors. although displacement current can heat up dielectric materials (like paper which I showed in a video)
@@MasterIvo I appreciate this well thought out and highly informative response, its really clearing up a lot of things for me. I wish you the best in all your future endeavors.
[23:33] energy in the form of light and motive power (The teleforce). A curious phenomenon to be examined later. Explaining the teleforce concept. Tesla was a genius!
Note: Ether is not the only form of conductivity though empty space besides inductance fields and radiant transmitable frequencies. It took me many years to understand, there is another option Nikola Tesla and the teleforce exploits.
Do you have a link to his lecture notes you're showing? I'd love to go through it myself. I checked the description but I can't see anything (could be blind, a possibility lmao), also loved watching, keep it up. Searching on the googles and duckducks yields stuff that seems to transcribe the lecture but I can't find the exact one you're using.
@12:34 In Tesla's exhausted bulbs, given the very few gas molecules available, the would be subject to a highly concentrated force from the changing potential. If there were a lot of molecules, they'd have less force per molecule. So Tesla's observation makes sense. With only a handful of molecules to absorb the voltage, there's going to be electrons migrating everywhere and whenever they do they likely to emit light.
@@juanmf i conceive of the electron very differently than you might imagine I do. however, for the purposes here, the principle stands that with more lines of force available per molecule of gas, the net voltage felt by those molecules is much higher than if the lines did not fully saturate the material. think of it like inertia, with less regular matter, a smaller force will produce a bigger result, making resonance easier. but if you have something too stiff, that needs more energy to be moved, it may take a lot more power.
Also Tesla said the pancake coil Is a must for the electrostatic field, as the magnetic field goes into the center and outward to outside of the coil and the electric fields goes upwards and downwards
@@doubleooh7337 in the context of free energy the pancake coils can be stacked on each other and duplicate the same energy without depleting the magnetic of the original. You focus on the magnetic instead of electric and create unlimited energy
The circuit that tesla is talking about matches Ed Grey Circuit, so all this makes sense the dampening of the oscillations in a vacuum using a resistive element while breaking and making the circuit at high speed seems to match what is being described in the lecture. collection of the electrostatic effect is how the ed gray circuit was described to work. It's not easy to create a vacuum with a tungsten rod with a graphite or similar resistive element. It's hard though, I've tried. I've not seen anyone really replicate that circuit either due to the vacuum requirements or a decent disruptive discharge or correct material for a resistive element to dampen the oscillation. I can generate great static discharge (enough to impact the wiring in the house to light the bulbs in the house but I can't collect the energy using this type of circuit (I'm assuming because my experiment wasn't in a proper vacuum and I was just energising the air (you see static discharges on metal and usb ports and monitors and tv's get interfered with and cut out even at a significant distance while the experiment runs). Maybe look at that circuit see if that takes you in a different direction, after all I think the ed grey circuit was thought to have been acquired from Telsa originally from what I understand.
I have the design that I redrew from a man who was building a plasma reactor that noticed his meter was showing 650 volts through the air, as it was not connected to anything, he wondered if he could collect it by placing a coil around reactor and yes he could, so he built a second reactor and did the same with it, the he got a car battery and sparked the first, collected the power and ran it through an simple enhancement circuit and pulsed the second one, then it repeated the prosses pulsing the first one again placing the reactors in resonance with each other. He then placed coils around the reactors for collecting power for use, it created 11kw at 190ams and consumed no fuel.
Hello Ivo, I am experimenting in the same direction. Donald Smith explains countless times to focus on the magnetic field produced and high voltage. A capacitor regardless of the capacity, the capacity gives the charging time, if it is charged with 1000V and the coil has 1 ohm, when discharging it produces a peak of 1000A and as you know the magnetic field produced is directly proportional to the Amperes! In addition, Kapanadze, Tesla, and Don Smith use SPARK GAP, and these devices are prepared to withstand Kilo-Amperes. I wish you success!
Yeah - and Don tries to remind us to fill and empty that Cap millions to hundreds of millions of times per second - I think Don used positive wave superposition with quarter wave generated by high Q resonance - his Caps were also like 8000 volts ? or higher
@@universeisundernoobligatio3283 I love the Electronics guys cause they reply super fast - In D Smith's case - his pumps were 1/4 wave producing HV and HF that discharged current at peak voltage and were rectified and charged his huge 8000 volt 2uF Cap bank - then DC to AC conversion into a large low frequency transformer - not sure we are on the same page - the secrets to me are how to load a 2ndary without loading the Primary with the Primary tuned to high Q resonance - D Smith somehow used 1/4 wave resonance - I've not done it - but it makes sense - thanks for the reply
@@universeisundernoobligatio3283 Oh - I've not done that yet - I am just relaying the logic - you talk about 'impedance' - but is impedance real or just imaginary ? - that is is impedance just a model for effective "resistance" - Our Transformer coil has an OHMIC resistance of 1 ohm - we apply 120v and yet the current is just 5 amps -when it 'should' be 120 amps - why again ? I believe there is ONLY Ohmic resistance so I believe we get to 5 amps because there is really only 5 volts on that coil - can you see that ?
Observing the 1000 A current peak when discharging a 10 nF capacitor charged to 1000 V through a 1 Ω resistor requires proper and very fast equipment because this peak is extremely short in duration. Here are some considerations: High-frequency oscilloscope: To measure this peak, an oscilloscope with a very high bandwidth (on the order of GHz) and a very fast sampling rate is required. The oscilloscope must be able to capture extremely short transient events. Current Probes: The current probes used must be able to measure very high currents and have a very fast response. Clamp current probes specially designed for high frequency transient measurements would be required. Correct measurement setup: Mounting must be done carefully to minimize stray inductances and contact resistances that can affect the measurement. Using short, thick wires for connections is essential. Protection and Safety: Given the very high current involved, it is essential to ensure adequate protection for equipment and operators. Measuring such current can be dangerous, so personal protective equipment and safety measures must be strictly observed. From CHAT GPT4 !
@@universeisundernoobligatio3283 Don Smit device have 6000V and 3A output... and if the impedance is high, what is the problem? connect light bulbs in series until you find another solution! :)
I had an experience once working as an electrician, were plunning in wire cables. Like a extension cord only a flexible metallic jacket and connector. With plastic insulation, then the connections. Having L1, L2, L3, neutral and ground, i was in a awkward position making the connection. Didn't notice the damaged connector. I get a bright flash. That is normal from a short to ground, what was strange , is the feeling of a large balloon being filled rapidly then poping! I actually felt pressure seemingly centered at the shorted connection. I don't know if it was magnetic or what it didn't seem like only the metal having the pressure, it seemed to be a force pushing against me, for a fraction of a second. It happened nearly 25 years ago. Its crazy the things we think we know, and what we do not know! Things that can be very interesting to discover the things we fo not know!
interesting, how high was the voltage? I heard similar stories of people feeling pressure near a sudden discharge, E P Dollard also showed it in one of his 80's borderland videos, but that didn't have a discharge it was near a lamp that was electrostatic driven
Have you heard of Ken Wheeler from the Theoria Apophasis channel? He might be good to talk to in relation to ether perturbation. There is also HUMAN INITIATED CONTACT, with some interesting math.
@@Greysen2025 Search within his videos to find his talks on proportional geometry in relation to Phi (search Phi), and how that relates to toroid/hyperboloid fields.
Fantastic presentation, thank you. I am trying to learn electronic design. And spelling, says the red lines you won't see lol. Any recommendations to true information. I try to be discerning, and it has become easier as I progress, but finding them can be hard.
Some can be found on my website, but as I am learning I also make mistakes. the best source is nature,she doesn't lie. do experiments and learn from her.
Referencing your question at 10:34, "Which polarity to discharge reminds me of Edwin Gray's "Splitting the Positive", where a terminal of high Positive potential is discharged across a gap toward a terminal with a low Positive potential.
I guess this is the disclaimer video to your previous one. But when you strive to stand on the same foundation as previous giants, you are destined to have big results also. I still think your system and its tuning to match changed impedances to be far superior to anything else at this time, and that when anybody follows your previous step by step instructions they will be pleasantly rewarded. So, keep up the great work guiding us all on the path to a more powerful future with clean infinite energy.
So ahead of his time. @Master_Ivo if you translate some of the terminology into the terms we use today then the whole thing doesn't seem so esoteric. The part about discussing the possibilities of harnessing both the "electricity" and the electrical energy within a "globe" and the two "moving in the same lines," well he basically just invented the vacuum tube right there. He, at that point, already knew that the electricity (aka electrons) in an electrical circuit flow within the conductive element, but the ENERGY (fields) actually flows in the dielectric space around the conductor- something that a lot of today's engineers STILL don't know.. So he's talking about setting up a capacitor within a vacuum-sealed globe and the fact that it's going to kick ass because of the constrained dielectric space- Electricity and electrical energy shooting across the dielectric in tandem, in one direction, and in a real big hurry. So what's another word for a capacitor inside vacuum-sealed glass where the dielectric is a gap and it operates at very high voltages? Tube. Combine that with his comments about the ease of lighting the filament within the vacuum and he's basically at the brink of inventing the vacuum tube. He's like 95% there. Of course Tesla will not get credit for that, some British dude will. But this is exactly what Tesla is describing. He goes on to say when you "excite the luminosity with AC the medium is either strained or released, giving rise to only one kind of wave- contact or break" so he's talking about feeding it an alternating control voltage and getting a bigger wave out of it- an output wave produced by make-or-break conductivity. A voltage controlled voltage amplifier! Where an AC control determines the flow of electrons off of a heated cathode thus modulating conductivity to the vacuum capacitors anode. It's a tube, man. A vacuum tube. But it seems Tesla was too ahead of his time for his own good. In this same lecture there's evidence of this when he gets into the the next part. The controlled "disruptive discharge" of the condenser (aka the not yet invented vacuum tube) preferably at very high frequencies, NOT oscillating (AC), but rather going in the same direction (DC). So the terminology "Alternating Current" and "Direct Current" don't even exist yet but Tesla is keenly aware of the two, and he knows how much power he could basically get for free if he could operate this high-voltage vacuum capacitor with very high frequency DC pulses. Can you say "Switching Power Supply"? Well before you say that you've got to say "Field Effect Transistor" first right? Slow down, Tesla. Slow thee F*CK down. He's wanting to do FET stuff. And he does essentially have a really really slow FET (FETs with pilot lights aka TUBES) but he's jumping way ahead into switching power supply territory when he hasn't fully baked the concept of the vacuum tube yet. His plight was that his ideas were too advanced for the physical technology of his time and I think he didn't know how to properly cope with that. Who would? We're predating the existence of basic electrical terminology here so how was he supposed to know what size steps were appropriate to take when a crawling pace hadn't even been established yet. If Tesla has been viewing the progress of EE from the afterlife, you can bet there was a point when he turned around slowly, looked God right in the face and said. "1856?..... You had me born in eighteen fifty motherf*cking six? Was that funny to you? Did you have a good laugh at that? Ha f*cking Ha, you can get your own damn Netflix subscription I'm deleting your profile."
I have a machine that uses high voltage as static electricity and it produces a field bubble. The 2 rotating plates with a wire that goes through the tesla coil ( not attached ) will make another field bubble. By increasing the power of the tesla coil you can move the static field. If you reverse the high voltage and the tesla coil it will hold in the static field and begin to charge the air. The system is open air no chamber needed.
@@MasterIvo you can use a fluorescent light to define the field. you can also use am radio. The tesla coil has a thicker field than a static field ( 2 dc flybacks in series). I am not sure if it is the magnetic value or the frequency. The static field runs at 260khz and the tesla coil field at 460khz. However the energy from the center rod on the tesla coil is different and might be why it works. (all testing with this device is done with the rod down the center and never directly connected to the tesla coil) When the tesla coil is on the spinning discs it pushed the static field connected to the frame 20 feet across the room. at 10 feet my computer started to change internet screens and make sounds like I put in something into the usb slot. So I know it pushes the static field. When the tesla coil is connected to the frame of the device and the spinning disc's are static. You cannot push past the tesla coil field. My computer never goes off. I mapped out the frame at low voltage 12v. It lights up 1" off the frame (TC). Then hanging on a string at 40v and the field was round like a bubble at 1 foot. with the static on the disc's it went to the edge of the bubble then stopped. It interacted with the TC field but never passed it. The energy in that area did make the light brighter. there could be a hole at top and bottom if the voltage is higher. I suspect it is there because the frame on the top and bottom are plastic. The whole thing acts live a spinning vortex on top and bottom and a magnetic field that rotates around the center plate. I have done high voltage tests at 20kv to see the direction of the energy from the disc's and it goes to a point in the center. Sorry for the long winded answer. I hope it helps. By the way I use a pnp slayer exciter on my TC 40v all day no problem or a zvs no spark gap. Both dc input.
@@MasterIvo If you ever want to chat. we have a group that has tesla coil builders coil builders and a one of a kind geometry coil builder and all of them are very good. or you just have more questions just ask. We do live shows Monday and Wednesday on the channel 3pm pst. We would be happy to change the time to meet what you may need.
Super imposed vibrations? Harmonics? Replace the lightbulb with a receiver plate separated by a dielectric. Now you are starting to get into the magnifying transmitter receiver and the teleforce receiver. Both will oscillate changing polarity, however with a diode (or half or full wave bridge rectifier) power can then be harnessed fro. The alternating pulsed frequencies to be converted into a battery or a capacitor as the storage device into usable energy. This is the other side of the tesla coil wireless power transmission people don't know about. It works with both directed ungrounded energy and omnidirectional grounded energy. Tesla was a genius!
Your discharging circuit has own oscillating frequency and coil around that bar has own. They both overlap each other. This is not harmonic frequency. You can add ferrite rod inside that coil or in close proximity to see that frequency will change.
Just a reminder, the inverse of propagating energy from a tower to deliver free energy is a very similar construction trying to pull ambient energy out of the atmosphere and likely teslas potential real plan to power the town with static energy was mocked or discredited to steal more of his work.
interesting idea to reverse engineer it. not a broadcast of power, but a reciever or better said creater of power by using the electrostatic voltage from the ambient medium
@@MasterIvo I read up on a ring laser in a vacuum that can stir space time. By crossing 4 laser beams to for a square a magnetic field should be generators on the middle as the light beams swirl the aether. Also light vortices in a vacuum should have a magnetic field. What are your thoughts on this?
In your experiment, have you considered that the voltage harmonics you were seeing were the combined signal of the wire the loose coupled probe was meant to record and something like the electrostatic lines of force coming out of the spark gap? (maybe even the coil too). i imagine having it connected directly would make confounding signals fade away.
It might also be possible to produce a "force field" effect with longitudinal waves by transmitting ever larger positive or negative waves designed to merge at a predetermined distance. As you know these waves can travel at different velocities depending on amplitude, a tiny tail on the end of the wave of opposite charge can be used to prevent repulsion.
*Energy can flow between + and + and - and - and ground and ground. *Shake a bottle of tourmaline tumble rocks next to a fieldmeter for the electric AND magnetic field.
I insist! His extra coil already solved it. The load messes up impedance (i.e. resonant freq of the system as a whole), Meyer had THE SAME issue with his water capacitor. Water pollutants and same water during startup of the resonant cavity would change resonant freq. he built a digital freq scanner around his voltage intensifier circuit to maintain the system in resonance.
@@juanmf That's not what Meyer was doing, resonance came later to optimize the system, Meyer's method is to mix Nitrogen with Hydrogen to slow the rate of combustion to make it usable as a fuel.
@@JenkoRun yeah but how would you get the hydrogen in the first place? His technology did use resonance to generate HHO at overunity compared to faraday electrolysis. Then he altered the gas with noncombustable gases to make its burn rate equal to that of gasoline so he can run it in a gasoline engine. There is also the idea of him mixing the gas with ionized gasses that can lead to the energy yield of the gas beeing 3 folds greater.
My reading of Tesla suggests he was inadvertently generating uncontained cold plasmas of open air. High dv/dt EMFs selectively energise electrons over much-heavier ions, adding energy to them and boiling them off atoms and molecules. Cool ions in a sea of superheated electrons constitutes so-called 'cold plasma' (actually the kind of plasma for which the word was borrowed from biology, their remarkable self-reactivity reminiscent of immunobiological processes in blood plasma) - AKA non-thermal or non-equilibrium plasmas. What happens next is basically condensed-matter physics - under duress of high-energy / high enthalpy, lower-entropy contingency states become available for the system to drop down and relax into, especially as regards spontaneous formations of coherent quasi-bosons, comprised of spin-coupled electron condensates clustering around stripped ions. The tiny bullets of metal being ejected by the dome of his radiating emitter - one notably striking just above his heart and, according to him, nearly killing him - are consistent with descriptions of 'strange radiation' emanating from various charge-clustering / EVO experiments. Likewise, the misty white glow that progressively ensheathed his apparatus the longer it ran is consistent with a cold plasma forming around his equipment. If you look at the progress of his patent applications around this time, they're focused on ever-faster dv/dt impulses such as mechanically spinning switches; basically high-speed pulsed DC. This was Tesla's 'undiscovered country', an uncharted wild frontier of new effects awaiting discovery as the thresholds of high-frequency switching were steadily improved. He basically believed the vacuum could become superconducting, if he developed the principles far enough, and this was the basis of his proposed breakthrough energy transmission system. What he was actually doing however was increasing the conductivity of air, by ionising it. This was prior to Enrico Fermi or Wolfgang Pauli, or the discoveries of spin angular momentum and the distinctions between fermion and boson, let alone the nature of superconductivity as we now understand it. This is obviously not to demean or disparage his work, but at this latter stage in his research he was obviously too far ahead of his time and so lacking the conceptual frameworks to interpret his results in the same way we can today. The transmission system would never have worked the way he intended. He correctly identified that the white glow was obviously a dissipative mechanism, thus concluding it represented a systemic inefficiency which would have to be ameliorated if he were ever to reach his goal of lossless transmission. This is why he chose to scale up the radiating emitter, finding that this allowed him to attain higher switching frequencies before the white mist began to accumulate, also eliminating the potentially-deadly shrapnel discharges from the dome. Yet eliminating the plasma likewise eliminated the conductive path it had been forming.. He was simply trying to go too far, too soon, his ultimate objectives doomed to failure.
Best video yet Ivo. That was a magnificent catch on some detials of that lecture. I can't help but think about some things Gerard Morin was seeing in some of his experiments and prototypes. I have watched this over a couple times here and on my phone this morning. This will be resonating in my brain. What kind of resonance do you suppose that would be called? LOL
@12:22 Tesla's vacuum was not perfect, and in such, the molecules left (and there were definitely some) have a huge mean-free-path, and such a lot more kinetic energy ( and easy to create light on impact), vs when they are close together in under 1 atmosphere pressure. Tesla actually discusses exactly that but in another writing, do not remember if it were in the "Electrician" or in one of the other magazines sometimes he was publishing/discussing his experiments. @23:00 If you build and run the circuit you will observe the "curious" phenomenons. Basically the circuit is a single loop primary of a Tesla coil as the same effect can be observed there too. The impedance phenomena is clearly visible/sensed when human touches the terminals and conveys current proportional to its (dynamic) impedance, vs the rest of the circuit, based on the chosen discharge frequency. Can not recommend more for anyone interested to read Tesla's "Colorado Spring Notes 1899-1900". Ones these writings are understood it is very clear what Tesla was thinking was. By no means though it is easy. Tesla writes in the 19th century terms and concepts and learning how to dive in his thinking, with capacitance and inductance measured in cm2, takes quite some time. But understanding that book it totally worth it for demystifying Tesla's work in the electric field, at east.
E hoje em dia temos inteligencia artificial para nos auxiliar na compreensão do trabalho de Tesla e de Maxwell 👍Parabéns ao Mestre Ivo por tanta dedicação esforço ao longo deste anos...
When I see the weird oscillations I think on a superposition of two frequencies - one of the primary discharge and the eigen frequency of the coil and its self capacitance. And I think of runtime effects and reflections on the end of the coil or wherever the impedance abruptly changes.
This infinite energy experimenter, me, (happens to be in rotary magnetics) seems to be following similar path to yours. If-this-then-that -so why doesn't it work. Year by year we inch closer to that light-bulb idea moment. In different fields (ha ha) we delve the 'impossible'. Like Tesla but without big-buck$ interests' hinderance. Good luck to us both.
Correction on previous comment sorry in the previous video Tuning Dual Resonant system, you used DC on capacitor voltage coil and AC on current coil. Just wondering why AC on current coil to produce oscillations for magnetic field current? Thanks
Colorado Springs Notes, 1899-1900, Nolit Beograd, 1978, str. 76, 07. July 1899: "There are two ways to achieve voltage through resonant overvoltage: either the secondary is placed in a loose coupling (k 0.5) with the primary and then raise the voltage with an additional coil - an "Extra Coil" - or inductance that is not inductively coupled to the primary. The latter method I have found preferable when high E.M.F. is desired.. The favor of electromotive force at the very beginning of his research, and the CHOICE OF PURE POTENTIAL INSTEAD OF VOLTAGE, is a very important decision of Nikola Tesla, which, I am sure, was crucial for his success and for achieving the efficiency of the machine with which Tesla was pleased (final measurements on December 14, 1899). A potential is a scalar field, a term perfectly suited to the term "ether" while the voltage (vector) is equal to the potential difference and in fact the work required to move the electric charge between two points in the electric field. ...) The classic version of Tesla's transformer Tesla rejected in his considerations on July 7, 1899 is significantly different from the variant that Tesla chose that day and called "Magnifying Transformer. The first version of a high voltage transformer with an air core, spark bend and capacitor in Drag from top and touch the back button to exit full S. Patent 454,622 - "Electrical Lighting screen..
Do you know why you agree that "high pulses generate electrostatic"? If you understand the reason, the "generate more energy than the electric pulse itself" is clearer. Source: I've just been thinking about this for several years.
@@JenkoRun This is the problem with parrots. You need to conceive things on your own. Ken would call you the f word for believing the ether is composed of gas or matter itself. How can something be non-Cartesian and a gas at the same time? The ether isn’t made of anything. Matter is a mirage of the ether.
@@FVLMEN I am aware of what parroting is and I am not doing that, you might as well be asking how a non-cartesian dimension exists at all with that question. We have a non-cartesian dimension, counterspace, already, so what's wrong with it being composed of a non-cartesian substance? I never said it was composed of gross matter did I? I see no issue here. And if you want to debate *refrain from mocking or insulting me,* I won't entertain that attitude with you.
Excellent video Ivo, thank you for sharing. Here's what catches my attention in your video to explain what the longitudinal magneto dielectric resonant mode is. For your experiment with this resonance mode, you used electro-magnetism, i.e. the electro-inductive force. You explain that the difference between your experiment and Tesla's, who used an electrostatic electrostatic resonance mode. What I understand from your graph is that, like AC electricity, when a magnet's field line passes through a winding 90° out of phase with it, electricity is produced. If we compare the dielectric lines of force that push on the ether around the winding wire (coil) to those of a magnet's field, we realize that we're getting a 90° phase shift again, which should result in the production of radiant electricity, don't you think Ivo? Thank you !!
I think some of Tesla's toroid inventions had CCW + CW winds that are sort of Bucking Coil like - not sure but my guess is those Inventions were essentially Free Power but not spelled out overtly
At 48:55 that is self interference between the different harmonic waves which are non aligned. Both constructive and destructive.....resulting in dissapation maybe?
Neat. I want the document please. I read really fast and would rather not hear it out loud. Can you please cite your source material so everyone can download it? Thank you sir.
Nikola Tesla 1891 lecture, I'll put it on my website, as there are many versions out on the web without pictures. I'll but the link in the comment section and pin it.
In some circumstances, a Tesla coil powered by an electric arc starts to generate static electricity. All surrounding items also become charged. Yes, Tesla knew that there is a difference between static electricity and the oscillating current that produces an electromagnetic field.
Thanks for putting out this video and calling attention to this incredible lecture. Do you fully understand what Tesla is talking about when he says 'conjoint' effect instead of 'differential'? He did not use the same terms that we do today to describe the same effects. Let me know if you need me to elaborate.
@@MasterIvo Conjoint effect" in the context of an electrostatic field means ta ta da.....scalar. He was saying that the two terminals act together and produced a uniform field. Like the temperature in the room the field is the same everywhere. Scalar.
If the spark discharge is strong enough, a small nuclear explosion occurs at the anode, which creates a blast wave inside the conductor that can be picked up
I had a Tesla patent called The Orgone Generator that he built after going to Egypt that drew power strait from the earth that under testing was said to be 20,000 times more powerful then the power we use today, all for free, I did a video about it on my channel if you want to know more about it.
I think why Tesla never mentions Keely is that Tesla never understood music especially on a synthesis level specifically the nature of fm (bessel function & multiplication). Your experiment shows the envelope of a modulator falling off but the fundamental (carrier) is always present. You can't see this from a fourier perspective. The oscilliscope just shows essentially the amplitude (height) of a sphere. It's hard to explain but a sphere has height, width and depth. so you get just 1D over time when you need 3 dimensions.
Tesla himself commented only briefly on Keely in that he knew of the principles but could not understand fully what Keely himself was implementing (not to mention Keely was never the greatest at explaining his inventions as he worked from purely intuition and this while great for inventing makes it poor for getting others to understand what you are doing) not to mention they were utilizing two very different avenues to access the Aether, Keely himself directly utilizing what could be the Tonal aspect of the Aether while Tesla was utilizing more so the electrical. That being said Tesla didn't besmirch Keely's name when everyone else was dragging it through the ground saying that his machines were hoaxes, so there's that.
@@bobdole27 @masterivo I have never come across any written record of Tesla mentioning Keely, if you have this information I would love to check it out. Keely wrote extensively on his work, I don't think it's fare to say he went off intuition. As a scientist and musician/conductor he pulled from the same universal template as Pythagoras, Macrobius, Plato and Boethius which is what gave him the upper hand on Tesla. He was not understood simply becuase you need to understand "Music" as it was taught in the Quadrivium school and prior. He mentions using the 3 6 9 proportions by means of harmonics, octaves and intervals and I don't believe many are able to understand what that really means. Essentially the ratios and proportions he used were arithmetic mean (harmonics eg. 24, 48, 72, 86 etc ), Geometric mean (Octave eg. 24,48, 96,192 etc) and Harmonic Mean (Intervals eg. C-24hz - -D-E-F-G-A-B-(C-48hz) etc ). In that understanding you can use them together in your work and it is what Tesla could never grasp.
I want to thank you for your latest effort to increase human energy, as you continue to clearly inform and systematically educate, and in so doing, remove the retarding forces of ignorance and stupidity which haunt us still in this modern day and age.
if the voltage change is quick enough, the energy will be transmitted away as a longitudinal wave, and thus the oscillation will stop. this needs a low inductance (few turns) primary
@@MasterIvo i was thinking a high impedance coil would give the switch more time to open thus preventing the current from catching up to the voltage ..
17:21 You still don't get it. No offense. But he's simply talking about the harmonic content of waves that aren't perfectly sinusoidal. 16:59 No, he says what kind of waves he's talking about in the same sentence. Note the semicolon "...this giving rise to only one kind of waves; a sudden contact or break." What type of waves? The contact or break type AKA square waves. Actually, any wave that's not perfectly sinusoidal "are essential for the production of superimposed waves." So he's saying sine waves don't inherently produce harmonics. Do we know this to be true? Yes. Waves that have an abrupt contact or break point (square, triangle, sawtooth, anything other than sine) are "essential for the production of superimposed waves (harmonics)." Do we know this to be true? Yes. So you see, you are unnecessarily complicating what he's saying, man.
Well, I see it differently. a sudden contact OR break, not AND like a square wave has. So after a slow drop, a sudden rise in voltage OR after a slow rise in voltage a sudden drop in voltage. You are absolutely right in the production of harmonics, I am very curious how these harmonics can serve us, when tuned to a lower sub harmonic. My "what are impulses" video might clarify this for you, as the longitudinal fast displacement of energy needs to go in one direction, not back and forth. ua-cam.com/video/YnijhZdAseA/v-deo.html So a current impulse is needed from a capacitor diacharge, not a voltage impulse (or square wave) from a coil discharge. Why? because we need a net inflow of energy into the conductor, so the load can use it. that means a fast negative to positive voltage discharge. (and a slow charging of the capacitor to a negative voltage).
Ivo, (1) Do we go with sawtooth waves now? In the past you were using square waves except in the propulsion video. Is there still a useful benefit of square waves, (2) I understand using DC to charge capacitor. In the precious video Tuning Dual Resonant I believe used DC on current coil. Is using AC to provide oscillations so that we get the magnetic field for current? Thank you.
Square wave for driving the mosfets sawtooth for the primary(might need to be combined with parallel resonance) ac for the secondary. -hV dc offset could be given to the secondary maybe... need to be tested
I'm making a members only recap video with all essential stuff I learned so far in the past 8 years, this topic will included. When my experiments are giving worthy results I as always will post them on this channel including all necessary info to replicate it.
I have been able to bring both current and voltage in phase, which in theory gave overunity of the energy present. But under load it phase shifted again, so no real overunity. working on a method to shift the current back in phase underload. fingers crossed
Static charges are all around us as well as Having gamma waves at the beginning of lightning passing through the ground up discharge the entire process of ball lightning is a literal vibration of gravity to the point of waves bubbles in the mindset looking at these formations up close and personally I think of them as the new born technology of up down quarks
What do you think of John Bedini's u tube videos? He explains over unity very well, and from what I see his machine functions. thank you this was a great video.
Thanks. I am familiar with some of those videos. They hold little value to me as they only show resonant effects. I have never seen real usable "overunity" explained in a practical manner, but that is my intention to do once I figure it out.
The ring up portion happens within the discharge period (plus the 1st resonant peak). The coil has 3 peaks in that period. I assume as the stimulus positive dv/dt is still present during this initial oscillation, it pushes the amplitude up. Thoughts?
the lecture is a long text, time to try again to dive into. in my view the magnetic component is used as a flux multiplier to drive more current (specifically in bucking mode of output coils), the static component is used to create the electric potential in those coils.
@Master Ivo, I'm sure you have figured out how Tesla's magnifying transmitter worked. Of course, the technology works. Technology is not the problem. People are the problem. Knowing how the device works, it reveals other aspects of the electrical nature of our planet. The earth has many electrical layers. The surface and ionosphere are negatively charged. In between those two layers is another layer, which is positively charged. It seems to be the same altitude as the ozone layer, which is at the bottom of the stratosphere. With these facts in mind, I have determined that the electricity that causes lightning is not generated by clouds, as is the popular belief. The electricity is already up there. Water vapor condenses around the positively charged particles and pulls them towards the earth. It is not the voltage breaking down the air that causes lightning. It is the rotation of the earth and its magnetic field that compels the positive ions to return upwards. It is magnitomotive force that causes most lightning. (Sometimes the ions can be pushed all the way to the ground and you get what looks like upside-down lightning. ) An interesting fact; like charges normally repell each other but when they move together in the same direction they generate magnetic fields which causes the particles to be deflected towards each other. This forms a filament or bolt. Of course, it wasn't until 1899 that Tesla accidentally discovered how to pull energy from the electrical layer above us. He does say in his patent that the central coil B does short-circuit when the voltage applied occurs more rapidly than normal. The 3, 6, 9 chord produces a sawtooth waveform, in which the voltage in one part rises very rapidly. It's such a simple and elegant method of producing a DC impulse with an AC current. Of course, the coil B would have to be non-insulated. That is why he wound the coil on an insulator. It also explains the necessity of the hood at the top of the coil.
Actually the high voltage Sawtooth wave in the low inductance primary produces 3rd harmonics in the secondary, Tesla even worked with higher harmonics.
@MasterIvo That sounds about right. Naturally, the center coil (coil B in the patent) should have the largest inductance so that the voltage could overcome the smaller radius of the turns and behave as a conductor with a diameter of the insulated drum it is wound upon ( in other words, short-circuit). My dad paid a guy to give him the secret of Tesla's free energy. I think it was Don Smith. He didn't want to my dad directly so he told me as I was only 4 years old. He simply said that it short-circuited. Reading Tesla's patent, that is what Tesla says but in other words.
Congrats, you are getting very close to getting it.. Think more about the dielectric that is between the plates of the capacitor. More specifically, the dielectric that is permeated with the aether. If the aether is Paul Dirac's aether then slow charge and fast discharge (with a positive voltage) will result in a dielectric that has net (but fluctuating) positive charge. If the aether is electrons, then you have succeeded in reducing the net number of electrons (aether) within the dielectric. Got it?
Consider that what you may need is a fast, spark gap type charge (resulting in the dielectric having a asymmetrical pos/neg charge) - then a period of time ( with no connection) to allow the dielectric to equalize - which is does quite naturally in an electron aether). Then slowly discharge the capacitor/dielectric and retrieve the extra electrons added from the aether.
And you're espousing absolute bullshit. If you're on meds I'm sorry and I don't want to offend you but there is zero Truth in anything you just said here.
There is an issue with your idea, Electron particles do not exist. *all* the electrical pioneers (Tesla, Steinmetz, Maxwell, JJ Thomson, Heaviside, etc) rejected this idea of Electron Particles.
@@JenkoRun Yes. Experiments to detect an electron aether that permeates all space and matter have failed and the conclusion was that it does not exist. Now, there is evidence that something exists and is described as mysterious, dark, and even non- baryonic. We are a lot like fish in the ocean trying to detect the presence of water.
Not Electron Aether, electron particles, the electron particle does not exist. Period. You are correct that the Aether exists, you are wrong that it's made of electrons. @@asiseeit...6915
No, to do that you either need a potential difference between negative polarities, no positive voltage potential, or you need tap the center of a resonating tesla coil, like what Old Man Builds is doing.
I believe lightning is only a trigger to the amperage current in the strike . It’s an accumulation of radiant energy as the high tension path is achieved..
A Jacob’s ladder or arc as it grows upwards is the radiant energy accumulation. The initial spark jump was the path of least resistance and the heat build and current is the resultant from the radiant energy. The longer the arc is sustained in dc (not AC frequency, but perhaps I’m not sure) the greater the accumulation effect. In the Jacob’s ladder experiment the flame is divergent from heat rising and heat building..? Isn’t it..?
[20:20] Electrostatic field of force. Can also be known as the concept of teleforce. The single direction of discharge following an electrostatic path. There is another name for this.
This is the link to the 1891 Lecture of Nikola Tesla, which is discussed in this video:
magstar.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/1891-lecture-New-York-Columbia-college.pdf
All pictures are included, but the numbering is -100 so instead of fig. 129 in the video, in the book it is fig. 29
This is because this is the original released lecture
Have you read Thomas Minderle’s “Introduction to Scalar Physics” pdf? Highly recommend, also thanks for the videos
How does the flyback output DC voltage without a rectifier?
@@emichael06 it has a built in diode
@@MasterIvo the flyback has the diode or the ZVS?
@@emichael06 the flyback has the diode, it rectifies the ac high voltage into dc.
A zvs also has diodes but they have other functions, you can look it up.
I like what and how you present this subject. It is very well needed. I know alot of EEs that are clueless.
Ivo, this by far has been my favorite video. I can see the light bulb moments going off in your head and it is exciting to watch. I greatly appreciate this long format video. Although I'm sure longer videos get less views, I really really appreciate your labor and efforts. Best regards. And I love the VR too btw...I'm a visual learner so it helps a lot.
You are brilliant MasterIvo, please don't ever stop your research you'll be remembered forever
30:01 This might be why certain inventions with spark gaps can develop frosted tips on them, or why some circuits can actually cool the wires as opposed to heating them: electrostatic implosions and explosions sweeping away the energy with them, giving a cooling effect!
The only thing I've heard is with gallium. Interesting I will see what I can learn about this.
@@CheyenneChild- great point! TE Bearden and others talk of this extensively.
@CheyenneChild I would love to be able to get these electric cooling effects. the conductor with capacity probably needs a very fast negative voltage discharge (to zero volt).
but it is easy to miss.
altough I often wonder why my mosfets stay so cool.
I wish I had a permanent on IR camera...
Thank you for taking the time to share your research Master Ivo.
My pleasure!
I read Nikola Tesla Lecture from 1891 three years ago, but I never understood this part as clearly as you did.
I also read it years ago. It finally clicked, after doing a lot of research
Pleas read books.google.mk/books?id=ySsNiCPUPecC&pg=PP1&source=kp_read_button&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&gboemv=1&ovdme=1&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
See youtube.com/@rickfriedrich?si=pQjzC3EDZugOZ6RT
Everyone needs Free Energy to break this cycle of Power Hungry Control Freaks. It’s time for Humanity to move forward.
Motivational
@@Gnaritas42Nice BS. Lenz's law can easily be circumvented with partnered output coils parallel with each other using a single loop core where the primary winding envelops both of them as a solenoid.
@@lukiepoole9254it’s time to think outside the box and not do what we were taught or believe what to be true. Experiment.
Do you really think that the control freaks would allow freedom at all? We're talking about the clash of the classes(elite vs mortals) here! That's the right dividing line!the worst ever motivation is money because it leads to division!
@@adammontgomery7980depends on your definition of "free". Energie is everywhere. The key is how to unlock it.
Than you Evo you never fail to stretch my mind and offer new paths of thought to the one I am on .
@Ivo
I wanted to share a story with you that your video reminded me of. Back around 2011, I attended an energy conference in Southern Maryland, hosted by Larry Jarboe (presentations from that event are on UA-cam, but not the one I'm about to share). It was there that I witnessed an extraordinary demonstration by Carl Falsenis, which left a lasting impact on me.
Carl's demonstration featured a variant of the hairpin circuit, connected to a series of eight spark gaps that crackled with energy. This circuit also incorporated a mysterious bottle that had been evacuated and sealed through an intricate process involving bee pollen and some kind of vinegar solution, a detail Carl mentioned but kept mostly secret.
In the dimly lit room, about 15 of us watched in awe as Carl activated the circuit. A mesmerizing purple mist began to pour into the bottle, like a breach in the fabric of space itself. The mist was deep and vibrant, yet also dull and spectral, almost ghostly as it floated in the darkness.
The true marvel of the demonstration occurred when the bottle was brought near my hand. The same purple mist seemed to be pulled from my skin, as though the bottle was siphoning the very essence of energy from my body. The mist, which had appeared ghostly when held in the darkness, became much brighter near my hand. It was as if there was more energy density, more of the purple substance, being pulled from my skin. The sensation was intensely cold, as if the energy itself was being extracted. This eerie process was not only felt but seen, with the energy manifesting as a plasma-like purple mist, following the fluid dynamics of a mist or fog.
The mist appeared to emanate out of space itself, seemingly pulling energy from the very fabric of reality, and drawing an even larger degree of energy from living beings. This was evident when it was near a human hand, as the mist became far more vibrant and intense.
Having researched Tesla's circuits extensively, I was familiar with the principles at play, but I had never seen anything like this. Yet, despite my familiarity, I was unable to replicate the circuit. Carl was unwilling to provide the details, show the schematics, or explain the exact steps he used to prepare and seal the evacuated bottle. There were proprietary steps that he kept secret.
Your video brought these vivid memories back to the forefront of my mind, and I felt compelled to share this extraordinary experience with you. If you ever wish to delve deeper into these intriguing phenomena, please do not hesitate to reach out.
That sounds amazing, I would love to witness it. No doubt the bottle was near vacuum, with just a little gas inside. Tesla's 1891 lecture mostly refered to producing light, so I advise you to read it!
That's amazing! I'm not sure if it's related but in the early days of Eric Dollard's work he experimented with evacuated bulbs of a specific type of old street light that had burned out with evaporated metals inside.
When energized in a monopolar field between 2 Tesla extra coils a purple plasma like mist started to form inside the bulb followed by galaxy like structures, sometimes the bulbs would breach with a hole but rather than loose their vacuum it got stronger as the purple mist flowed out of it, other times the whole thing would explode and the galaxy would remain without its container for a second or two, I wonder if Carl's experiment and this are related?
@@MasterIvo Tesla and his mentor had stuff just like this.
@@JenkoRun look up telas mentor and the black mist....
Thank you sir we appreciate your knowledge and experiments
My pleasure
Key thing is to decouple the source exciter from the load side. That way, the load doesn't pull from the source side but from the ambient field itself.
That's what the anti Lenz transformer do
I already showed how free energy works 2 years ago
Time 16:00 high voltage takes on a carrier frequency. Think magnetron resonance chamber. The microwave produced has the frequency set by the chamber of the magnetron.
Got interested in all of this again since I am older now and have money to experiment, do it as a hobby. Been researching for a couple of months and building coils and playing around.
Gotta say, this VR demonstration is by far, the best way for me to understand and visualise what is going on. Great job with the video and everything! Thank you.
Thanks, yes VR is a blessing for education
you need the bedini voltage spike or potential to fill the capacitor. You have to work on the other side of accepted energy. It is high voltage spikes.
Thankyou so much for sharing this Evo!👍❤️
My pleasure!!
I have seen 4 places in the world where 3 energy balls float around looking for spires. When the energy ball touches the spire, the town lights go on, the whole town. WEF our enemy destroying as much as possible.
There's unlimited potential in the void of understanding. 🐰
Tesla said his best Tesla Coil was the static powered Tesla Coil, he had a paper belt running over a think was a rubber roller at top and a glass roller at the bottom, that ran up the center of the HV coil, with a brass collector wire that rubs on the flat surface of the paper very lightly.
If you look up home made static generator you should find out the best materials to use.
@@SpaceManAus very cool
High voltage needs distance with the paper in the center and the electrostatic turns to charge. In fact the charge is so strong the paper will weigh (in force) 4-6x as much. I did a video on it. It also used 2 dc flybacks to produce the electrostatic effect. As you reduce the amps the frequency and voltage increases. 2 simple circuits can do the same thing. A trigger switch and a frequency generator with a duty cycle. Tesla was right on this one.
You again
@@deanmav3571exactly..
Seems like a good way to get on without an Earth ground?
Good to see you here Nathan.
ua-cam.com/video/hofuRiMdrDE/v-deo.htmlsi=vbGcc-AGubQak4Wk
This is a milestone, congratulations on your years of research paying off!
thanks!
Karl Palsness was trying to get me to understand this two decades ago when he was working with the hairpin circuit. This is also related to other research such as the "water fuel cell" where we have unipolar pulses of high potential.
On the topic of WFC's a vital element not talked about enough IMO is the use of Nitrogen, Meyer used an air intake to add the atmospheric Nitrogen to the Hydrogen mix to slow the rate of combustion to make it usable as a fuel, I seldom see people talk about this vital information.
As for running the fuel cell, spot on, it helps if there's no conductive contact between the - and + electrodes.
I have seen Karl's video's, very impressive
@@JenkoRun Absolutely. Good points. I used distilled water. I suppose all of this relates to the PROTELF system as well Where we have a high voltage unipolar discharge across a tungsten/carbon gap with alignment field (b-field). Thereby ejecting energy outwards at 90 degrees to the current flow. This system being well tested at lower voltages, but not high voltage which may transform the equation.
The "weird" effects you see with high frequency ringing likely has more to do with your test equipment. Specifically, your probes.
@@dodadew85 partly yes, as the hV probe was not connected directly to the primary , it also picked up the vibrations of the secondary
@@MasterIvo That, and/or probe compensation.
Thank you for this video. This is the best use of VR on UA-cam. I would love to see 3D VR shorts detailing each concept. Us viewers can then walk around each model as you sketch them. Please don't ever get discouraged.
Thanks for the idea!
Tariel Kapanadze,foi o que me veio a mente, parece ter relação e pode ser a chave, hoje em dia temos inteligencia artificial para nos auxiliar na compreensão do trabalho de Nikola Tesla e no Original de Maxwell 👍Parabéns ao Mestre Ivo por tanta dedicação e esforço ao longo deste anos...👍
AI is not for us, it's for monitoring/controlling us.
Obrigado
❣❣❣Dank! Prachtig om mee te gaan naar onze Nieuwe Wereld.
If it weren't for me being so swamped as of late I would have commented sooner on this magnificent video. It compelled me to not only go back and re read this specific Tesla lecture but his other famous ones with scrutiny. I would like to ask however what would you consider to be the bear amount of current needed from the initial source to create these effects, I know high voltage is of course the key to get the disruptive discharge but of course this would have to be accompanied with a certain threshold of current though very much less than from the initial source (such as we see in a step up transformer which is usually used to get the High voltage needed). That being said thank you once again for the the dearth of knowledge you continue to provide.
Thanks!
well, it is not the common type of current. Tesla often speaks about current, but he knew very well there are different types of currents.
Often called Tesla currents, what he spoke of were displacement currents, so these currents are depended on the capacity of the conductors.
If the chnaged in voltage is quick enough through a conductor, it won't make a magnetic (vortex) current, but instead a longitudinal dielectric displacement current (perpendicular to the conductor).
I once calculated the discharge current of a capacitor, and it was really high due to the short amount of time. So I made a parallel switch to be able to handle the current.
but to my surprise the mosfets stayed fairly cool.
Later I even used single mosfets with higher Rds and still it worked fine.
This proves to me Pure voltage sees no resistance, only (slow) magnetic current produces the heat in conductors.
although displacement current can heat up dielectric materials (like paper which I showed in a video)
@@MasterIvo I appreciate this well thought out and highly informative response, its really clearing up a lot of things for me. I wish you the best in all your future endeavors.
[23:33] energy in the form of light and motive power
(The teleforce).
A curious phenomenon to be examined later. Explaining the teleforce concept.
Tesla was a genius!
Note: Ether is not the only form of conductivity though empty space besides inductance fields and radiant transmitable frequencies.
It took me many years to understand, there is another option Nikola Tesla and the teleforce exploits.
Do you have a link to his lecture notes you're showing? I'd love to go through it myself.
I checked the description but I can't see anything (could be blind, a possibility lmao), also loved watching, keep it up.
Searching on the googles and duckducks yields stuff that seems to transcribe the lecture but I can't find the exact one you're using.
@12:34 In Tesla's exhausted bulbs, given the very few gas molecules available, the would be subject to a highly concentrated force from the changing potential. If there were a lot of molecules, they'd have less force per molecule. So Tesla's observation makes sense. With only a handful of molecules to absorb the voltage, there's going to be electrons migrating everywhere and whenever they do they likely to emit light.
Except there is no electrons as you imagine them.
@@juanmf i conceive of the electron very differently than you might imagine I do. however, for the purposes here, the principle stands that with more lines of force available per molecule of gas, the net voltage felt by those molecules is much higher than if the lines did not fully saturate the material. think of it like inertia, with less regular matter, a smaller force will produce a bigger result, making resonance easier. but if you have something too stiff, that needs more energy to be moved, it may take a lot more power.
@@jessemiller110what say you please, is the compositional makeup of “lines of force”, if not a modality of ether disturbance?
raw, important take here! excellent video
Glad you liked it!
Also Tesla said the pancake coil Is a must for the electrostatic field, as the magnetic field goes into the center and outward to outside of the coil and the electric fields goes upwards and downwards
I think you've missed the importance of fhe pancake coil, it's the only one with this desired effect
I've got a document i could send you?
@@doubleooh7337 in the context of free energy the pancake coils can be stacked on each other and duplicate the same energy without depleting the magnetic of the original. You focus on the magnetic instead of electric and create unlimited energy
@@scraw3 what does that have to do with what I'm saying? Absolutely nothing!
@@doubleooh7337 you don't have have to like it either. You just need to accept it. Now stop crying
The circuit that tesla is talking about matches Ed Grey Circuit, so all this makes sense the dampening of the oscillations in a vacuum using a resistive element while breaking and making the circuit at high speed seems to match what is being described in the lecture. collection of the electrostatic effect is how the ed gray circuit was described to work. It's not easy to create a vacuum with a tungsten rod with a graphite or similar resistive element. It's hard though, I've tried. I've not seen anyone really replicate that circuit either due to the vacuum requirements or a decent disruptive discharge or correct material for a resistive element to dampen the oscillation. I can generate great static discharge (enough to impact the wiring in the house to light the bulbs in the house but I can't collect the energy using this type of circuit (I'm assuming because my experiment wasn't in a proper vacuum and I was just energising the air (you see static discharges on metal and usb ports and monitors and tv's get interfered with and cut out even at a significant distance while the experiment runs). Maybe look at that circuit see if that takes you in a different direction, after all I think the ed grey circuit was thought to have been acquired from Telsa originally from what I understand.
I have the design that I redrew from a man who was building a plasma reactor that noticed his meter was showing 650 volts through the air, as it was not connected to anything, he wondered if he could collect it by placing a coil around reactor and yes he could, so he built a second reactor and did the same with it, the he got a car battery and sparked the first, collected the power and ran it through an simple enhancement circuit and pulsed the second one, then it repeated the prosses pulsing the first one again placing the reactors in resonance with each other.
He then placed coils around the reactors for collecting power for use, it created 11kw at 190ams and consumed no fuel.
Phase shift between inductor and capacitor makes maxima and minima of resonance
Great job buddy! Let’s build our free energy box for the world!
Yes!!
Hello Ivo, I am experimenting in the same direction. Donald Smith explains countless times to focus on the magnetic field produced and high voltage. A capacitor regardless of the capacity, the capacity gives the charging time, if it is charged with 1000V and the coil has 1 ohm, when discharging it produces a peak of 1000A and as you know the magnetic field produced is directly proportional to the Amperes! In addition, Kapanadze, Tesla, and Don Smith use SPARK GAP, and these devices are prepared to withstand Kilo-Amperes. I wish you success!
Yeah - and Don tries to remind us to fill and empty that Cap millions to hundreds of millions of times per second - I think Don used positive wave superposition with quarter wave generated by high Q resonance - his Caps were also like 8000 volts ? or higher
@@universeisundernoobligatio3283 I love the Electronics guys cause they reply super fast -
In D Smith's case - his pumps were 1/4 wave producing HV and HF that discharged current at peak voltage and were rectified and charged his huge 8000 volt 2uF Cap bank - then DC to AC conversion into a large low frequency transformer -
not sure we are on the same page - the secrets to me are how to load a 2ndary without loading the Primary with the Primary tuned to high Q resonance
- D Smith somehow used 1/4 wave resonance - I've not done it - but it makes sense - thanks for the reply
@@universeisundernoobligatio3283 Oh - I've not done that yet - I am just relaying the logic - you talk about 'impedance' - but is impedance real or just imaginary ? - that is is impedance just a model for effective "resistance" - Our Transformer coil has an OHMIC resistance of 1 ohm - we apply 120v and yet the current is just 5 amps -when it 'should' be 120 amps - why again ? I believe there is ONLY Ohmic resistance so I believe we get to 5 amps because there is really only 5 volts on that coil - can you see that ?
Observing the 1000 A current peak when discharging a 10 nF capacitor charged to 1000 V through a 1 Ω resistor requires proper and very fast equipment because this peak is extremely short in duration. Here are some considerations:
High-frequency oscilloscope: To measure this peak, an oscilloscope with a very high bandwidth (on the order of GHz) and a very fast sampling rate is required. The oscilloscope must be able to capture extremely short transient events.
Current Probes: The current probes used must be able to measure very high currents and have a very fast response. Clamp current probes specially designed for high frequency transient measurements would be required.
Correct measurement setup: Mounting must be done carefully to minimize stray inductances and contact resistances that can affect the measurement. Using short, thick wires for connections is essential.
Protection and Safety: Given the very high current involved, it is essential to ensure adequate protection for equipment and operators. Measuring such current can be dangerous, so personal protective equipment and safety measures must be strictly observed. From CHAT GPT4 !
@@universeisundernoobligatio3283 Don Smit device have 6000V and 3A output... and if the impedance is high, what is the problem? connect light bulbs in series until you find another solution! :)
I had an experience once working as an electrician, were plunning in wire cables. Like a extension cord only a flexible metallic jacket and connector. With plastic insulation, then the connections. Having L1, L2, L3, neutral and ground, i was in a awkward position making the connection. Didn't notice the damaged connector. I get a bright flash. That is normal from a short to ground, what was strange , is the feeling of a large balloon being filled rapidly then poping! I actually felt pressure seemingly centered at the shorted connection. I don't know if it was magnetic or what it didn't seem like only the metal having the pressure, it seemed to be a force pushing against me, for a fraction of a second. It happened nearly 25 years ago. Its crazy the things we think we know, and what we do not know! Things that can be very interesting to discover the things we fo not know!
interesting, how high was the voltage?
I heard similar stories of people feeling pressure near a sudden discharge, E P Dollard also showed it in one of his 80's borderland videos, but that didn't have a discharge it was near a lamp that was electrostatic driven
@@MasterIvo Could it be the longitudinal light electric field pressure like tesla used to charge capacitors with?
Have you heard of Ken Wheeler from the Theoria Apophasis channel? He might be good to talk to in relation to ether perturbation. There is also HUMAN INITIATED CONTACT, with some interesting math.
Just reviewed Ken describing something similar and it also works with teleforce.
@@Greysen2025 Search within his videos to find his talks on proportional geometry in relation to Phi (search Phi), and how that relates to toroid/hyperboloid fields.
Very very very good info man, thanks
Glad it was helpful!
This is probably how high voltage transmission lines work in the power grid, electrostatic collection
Have read the lectures and just did not understand until now. Thanks for the insight 😉
Fantastic presentation, thank you. I am trying to learn electronic design. And spelling, says the red lines you won't see lol. Any recommendations to true information. I try to be discerning, and it has become easier as I progress, but finding them can be hard.
Some can be found on my website, but as I am learning I also make mistakes. the best source is nature,she doesn't lie. do experiments and learn from her.
Referencing your question at 10:34, "Which polarity to discharge reminds me of Edwin Gray's "Splitting the Positive", where a terminal of high Positive potential is discharged across a gap toward a terminal with a low Positive potential.
voltage is relative, always measured between 2 points, you can determine either og the 2 points to be zero making the other positive or negative.
Fantastic video!!
Glad you liked it!
Very nice work sir...🙏♾️..... I love the discharge a piezoelectric tile makes. It's hard to believe something so small, has so much potential.
Cap dump circuit, for mos, scr, igbt with gate control for discharge with duty, pwm frequency with duty discharge.
yes, already on it
I guess this is the disclaimer video to your previous one. But when you strive to stand on the same foundation as previous giants, you are destined to have big results also. I still think your system and its tuning to match changed impedances to be far superior to anything else at this time, and that when anybody follows your previous step by step instructions they will be pleasantly rewarded. So, keep up the great work guiding us all on the path to a more powerful future with clean infinite energy.
Thanks! working hard to achieve it.
now testing with impulse chopping
@MasterIvo good to hear you still here! I'm waiting your next video with anxiety
@JuanPerez-lg8yl its in production, probably Wednesday
@@MasterIvo thanks in advance!
So ahead of his time. @Master_Ivo if you translate some of the terminology into the terms we use today then the whole thing doesn't seem so esoteric. The part about discussing the possibilities of harnessing both the "electricity" and the electrical energy within a "globe" and the two "moving in the same lines," well he basically just invented the vacuum tube right there. He, at that point, already knew that the electricity (aka electrons) in an electrical circuit flow within the conductive element, but the ENERGY (fields) actually flows in the dielectric space around the conductor- something that a lot of today's engineers STILL don't know.. So he's talking about setting up a capacitor within a vacuum-sealed globe and the fact that it's going to kick ass because of the constrained dielectric space- Electricity and electrical energy shooting across the dielectric in tandem, in one direction, and in a real big hurry. So what's another word for a capacitor inside vacuum-sealed glass where the dielectric is a gap and it operates at very high voltages? Tube. Combine that with his comments about the ease of lighting the filament within the vacuum and he's basically at the brink of inventing the vacuum tube. He's like 95% there. Of course Tesla will not get credit for that, some British dude will. But this is exactly what Tesla is describing. He goes on to say when you "excite the luminosity with AC the medium is either strained or released, giving rise to only one kind of wave- contact or break" so he's talking about feeding it an alternating control voltage and getting a bigger wave out of it- an output wave produced by make-or-break conductivity. A voltage controlled voltage amplifier! Where an AC control determines the flow of electrons off of a heated cathode thus modulating conductivity to the vacuum capacitors anode. It's a tube, man. A vacuum tube. But it seems Tesla was too ahead of his time for his own good. In this same lecture there's evidence of this when he gets into the the next part. The controlled "disruptive discharge" of the condenser (aka the not yet invented vacuum tube) preferably at very high frequencies, NOT oscillating (AC), but rather going in the same direction (DC). So the terminology "Alternating Current" and "Direct Current" don't even exist yet but Tesla is keenly aware of the two, and he knows how much power he could basically get for free if he could operate this high-voltage vacuum capacitor with very high frequency DC pulses. Can you say "Switching Power Supply"? Well before you say that you've got to say "Field Effect Transistor" first right? Slow down, Tesla. Slow thee F*CK down. He's wanting to do FET stuff. And he does essentially have a really really slow FET (FETs with pilot lights aka TUBES) but he's jumping way ahead into switching power supply territory when he hasn't fully baked the concept of the vacuum tube yet. His plight was that his ideas were too advanced for the physical technology of his time and I think he didn't know how to properly cope with that. Who would? We're predating the existence of basic electrical terminology here so how was he supposed to know what size steps were appropriate to take when a crawling pace hadn't even been established yet. If Tesla has been viewing the progress of EE from the afterlife, you can bet there was a point when he turned around slowly, looked God right in the face and said. "1856?..... You had me born in eighteen fifty motherf*cking six? Was that funny to you? Did you have a good laugh at that? Ha f*cking Ha, you can get your own damn Netflix subscription I'm deleting your profile."
Genius comment
I have a machine that uses high voltage as static electricity and it produces a field bubble. The 2 rotating plates with a wire that goes through the tesla coil ( not attached ) will make another field bubble. By increasing the power of the tesla coil you can move the static field. If you reverse the high voltage and the tesla coil it will hold in the static field and begin to charge the air. The system is open air no chamber needed.
How to you know its a field bubble, and what do you mean by that? how do you experience it?
@@MasterIvo you can use a fluorescent light to define the field. you can also use am radio. The tesla coil has a thicker field than a static field ( 2 dc flybacks in series). I am not sure if it is the magnetic value or the frequency. The static field runs at 260khz and the tesla coil field at 460khz. However the energy from the center rod on the tesla coil is different and might be why it works. (all testing with this device is done with the rod down the center and never directly connected to the tesla coil)
When the tesla coil is on the spinning discs it pushed the static field connected to the frame 20 feet across the room. at 10 feet my computer started to change internet screens and make sounds like I put in something into the usb slot. So I know it pushes the static field.
When the tesla coil is connected to the frame of the device and the spinning disc's are static. You cannot push past the tesla coil field. My computer never goes off.
I mapped out the frame at low voltage 12v. It lights up 1" off the frame (TC). Then hanging on a string at 40v and the field was round like a bubble at 1 foot.
with the static on the disc's it went to the edge of the bubble then stopped. It interacted with the TC field but never passed it. The energy in that area did make the light brighter.
there could be a hole at top and bottom if the voltage is higher. I suspect it is there because the frame on the top and bottom are plastic.
The whole thing acts live a spinning vortex on top and bottom and a magnetic field that rotates around the center plate. I have done high voltage tests at 20kv to see the direction of the energy from the disc's and it goes to a point in the center.
Sorry for the long winded answer. I hope it helps. By the way I use a pnp slayer exciter on my TC 40v all day no problem or a zvs no spark gap. Both dc input.
@@MasterIvo If you ever want to chat. we have a group that has tesla coil builders coil builders and a one of a kind geometry coil builder and all of them are very good. or you just have more questions just ask. We do live shows Monday and Wednesday on the channel 3pm pst. We would be happy to change the time to meet what you may need.
Super imposed vibrations? Harmonics?
Replace the lightbulb with a receiver plate separated by a dielectric.
Now you are starting to get into the magnifying transmitter receiver and the teleforce receiver. Both will oscillate changing polarity, however with a diode (or half or full wave bridge rectifier) power can then be harnessed fro. The alternating pulsed frequencies to be converted into a battery or a capacitor as the storage device into usable energy.
This is the other side of the tesla coil wireless power transmission people don't know about.
It works with both directed ungrounded energy and omnidirectional grounded energy.
Tesla was a genius!
Your discharging circuit has own oscillating frequency and coil around that bar has own. They both overlap each other. This is not harmonic frequency. You can add ferrite rod inside that coil or in close proximity to see that frequency will change.
Just a reminder, the inverse of propagating energy from a tower to deliver free energy is a very similar construction trying to pull ambient energy out of the atmosphere and likely teslas potential real plan to power the town with static energy was mocked or discredited to steal more of his work.
interesting idea to reverse engineer it. not a broadcast of power, but a reciever or better said creater of power by using the electrostatic voltage from the ambient medium
@@MasterIvo I’m not sure what his patents or private notes might say or reveal but im sure he though about it both ways.
The "transmitter" was nessessary to initiate/resonate or "strike a spark"/energy flow from the aether/wheelworks of nature.
@@dananorth895 You either think you’re saying something that makes no sense and can’t be logically interpreted as hard as I try or you’re trolling.
Thank you.
You're welcome!
@@MasterIvo I read up on a ring laser in a vacuum that can stir space time. By crossing 4 laser beams to for a square a magnetic field should be generators on the middle as the light beams swirl the aether. Also light vortices in a vacuum should have a magnetic field. What are your thoughts on this?
In your experiment, have you considered that the voltage harmonics you were seeing were the combined signal of the wire the loose coupled probe was meant to record and something like the electrostatic lines of force coming out of the spark gap? (maybe even the coil too). i imagine having it connected directly would make confounding signals fade away.
Electromagnet and electrostatic are intertwined. ☯️
indeed they are.
It might also be possible to produce a "force field" effect with longitudinal waves by transmitting ever larger positive or negative waves designed to merge at a predetermined distance. As you know these waves can travel at different velocities depending on amplitude, a tiny tail on the end of the wave of opposite charge can be used to prevent repulsion.
Yes I have these units. Great video
*Energy can flow between + and + and - and - and ground and ground.
*Shake a bottle of tourmaline tumble rocks next to a fieldmeter for the electric AND magnetic field.
Something is moving the earth. That means there is friction going on somewhere(atmosphere). Then there has to be a way to harness it.
He figured it out. He just didn't realize he did.
I insist!
His extra coil already solved it. The load messes up impedance (i.e. resonant freq of the system as a whole), Meyer had THE SAME issue with his water capacitor. Water pollutants and same water during startup of the resonant cavity would change resonant freq. he built a digital freq scanner around his voltage intensifier circuit to maintain the system in resonance.
@@juanmf That's not what Meyer was doing, resonance came later to optimize the system, Meyer's method is to mix Nitrogen with Hydrogen to slow the rate of combustion to make it usable as a fuel.
@juanmf it's a lot simpler than that. I'm building a prototype. Should work, but you know how these things go.
@@apocraphontripp4728 let me know
@@JenkoRun yeah but how would you get the hydrogen in the first place? His technology did use resonance to generate HHO at overunity compared to faraday electrolysis. Then he altered the gas with noncombustable gases to make its burn rate equal to that of gasoline so he can run it in a gasoline engine. There is also the idea of him mixing the gas with ionized gasses that can lead to the energy yield of the gas beeing 3 folds greater.
That last little bit reminded me of a tank circuit . Thanks that was good.
My reading of Tesla suggests he was inadvertently generating uncontained cold plasmas of open air. High dv/dt EMFs selectively energise electrons over much-heavier ions, adding energy to them and boiling them off atoms and molecules. Cool ions in a sea of superheated electrons constitutes so-called 'cold plasma' (actually the kind of plasma for which the word was borrowed from biology, their remarkable self-reactivity reminiscent of immunobiological processes in blood plasma) - AKA non-thermal or non-equilibrium plasmas. What happens next is basically condensed-matter physics - under duress of high-energy / high enthalpy, lower-entropy contingency states become available for the system to drop down and relax into, especially as regards spontaneous formations of coherent quasi-bosons, comprised of spin-coupled electron condensates clustering around stripped ions. The tiny bullets of metal being ejected by the dome of his radiating emitter - one notably striking just above his heart and, according to him, nearly killing him - are consistent with descriptions of 'strange radiation' emanating from various charge-clustering / EVO experiments. Likewise, the misty white glow that progressively ensheathed his apparatus the longer it ran is consistent with a cold plasma forming around his equipment. If you look at the progress of his patent applications around this time, they're focused on ever-faster dv/dt impulses such as mechanically spinning switches; basically high-speed pulsed DC. This was Tesla's 'undiscovered country', an uncharted wild frontier of new effects awaiting discovery as the thresholds of high-frequency switching were steadily improved. He basically believed the vacuum could become superconducting, if he developed the principles far enough, and this was the basis of his proposed breakthrough energy transmission system. What he was actually doing however was increasing the conductivity of air, by ionising it. This was prior to Enrico Fermi or Wolfgang Pauli, or the discoveries of spin angular momentum and the distinctions between fermion and boson, let alone the nature of superconductivity as we now understand it. This is obviously not to demean or disparage his work, but at this latter stage in his research he was obviously too far ahead of his time and so lacking the conceptual frameworks to interpret his results in the same way we can today. The transmission system would never have worked the way he intended. He correctly identified that the white glow was obviously a dissipative mechanism, thus concluding it represented a systemic inefficiency which would have to be ameliorated if he were ever to reach his goal of lossless transmission. This is why he chose to scale up the radiating emitter, finding that this allowed him to attain higher switching frequencies before the white mist began to accumulate, also eliminating the potentially-deadly shrapnel discharges from the dome. Yet eliminating the plasma likewise eliminated the conductive path it had been forming.. He was simply trying to go too far, too soon, his ultimate objectives doomed to failure.
Best video yet Ivo. That was a magnificent catch on some detials of that lecture. I can't help but think about some things Gerard Morin was seeing in some of his experiments and prototypes. I have watched this over a couple times here and on my phone this morning. This will be resonating in my brain. What kind of resonance do you suppose that would be called? LOL
@12:22 Tesla's vacuum was not perfect, and in such, the molecules left (and there were definitely some) have a huge mean-free-path, and such a lot more kinetic energy ( and easy to create light on impact), vs when they are close together in under 1 atmosphere pressure. Tesla actually discusses exactly that but in another writing, do not remember if it were in the "Electrician" or in one of the other magazines sometimes he was publishing/discussing his experiments.
@23:00 If you build and run the circuit you will observe the "curious" phenomenons. Basically the circuit is a single loop primary of a Tesla coil as the same effect can be observed there too. The impedance phenomena is clearly visible/sensed when human touches the terminals and conveys current proportional to its (dynamic) impedance, vs the rest of the circuit, based on the chosen discharge frequency.
Can not recommend more for anyone interested to read Tesla's "Colorado Spring Notes 1899-1900". Ones these writings are understood it is very clear what Tesla was thinking was. By no means though it is easy. Tesla writes in the 19th century terms and concepts and learning how to dive in his thinking, with capacitance and inductance measured in cm2, takes quite some time. But understanding that book it totally worth it for demystifying Tesla's work in the electric field, at east.
E hoje em dia temos inteligencia artificial para nos auxiliar na compreensão do trabalho de Tesla e de Maxwell 👍Parabéns ao Mestre Ivo por tanta dedicação esforço ao longo deste anos...
When I see the weird oscillations I think on a superposition of two frequencies - one of the primary discharge and the eigen frequency of the coil and its self capacitance. And I think of runtime effects and reflections on the end of the coil or wherever the impedance abruptly changes.
This infinite energy experimenter, me, (happens to be in rotary magnetics) seems to be following similar path to yours. If-this-then-that -so why doesn't it work. Year by year we inch closer to that light-bulb idea moment. In different fields (ha ha) we delve the 'impossible'. Like Tesla but without big-buck$ interests' hinderance. Good luck to us both.
May the force be with us
Correction on previous comment sorry in the previous video Tuning Dual Resonant system, you used DC on capacitor voltage coil and AC on current coil. Just wondering why AC on current coil to produce oscillations for magnetic field current? Thanks
The current coil becomes resonant from the high voltage coil. The DC component should be a sawtooth wave
Colorado Springs Notes, 1899-1900, Nolit Beograd, 1978, str. 76, 07. July 1899: "There are two ways to achieve voltage through resonant overvoltage: either the secondary is placed in a loose coupling (k 0.5) with the primary and then raise the voltage with an additional coil - an "Extra Coil" - or inductance that is not inductively coupled to the primary. The latter method I have found preferable when high E.M.F. is desired.. The favor of electromotive force at the very beginning of his research, and the CHOICE OF PURE POTENTIAL INSTEAD OF VOLTAGE, is a very important decision of Nikola Tesla, which, I am sure, was crucial for his success and for achieving the efficiency of the machine with which Tesla was pleased (final measurements on December 14, 1899). A potential is a scalar field, a term perfectly suited to the term "ether" while the voltage (vector) is equal to the potential difference and in fact the work required to move the electric charge between two points in the electric field. ...) The classic version of Tesla's transformer Tesla rejected in his considerations on July 7, 1899 is significantly different from the variant that Tesla chose that day and called "Magnifying Transformer. The first version of a high voltage transformer with an air core, spark bend and capacitor in Drag from top and touch the back button to exit full S. Patent 454,622 - "Electrical Lighting screen..
teslauniverse.com/nikola-tesla/patents/us-patent-454622-system-electric-lighting
I agree that high pulses generate electrostatic. But generate more energy at electrostatic than electric pulse itself? This is difficult to believe.
Do you know why you agree that "high pulses generate electrostatic"? If you understand the reason, the "generate more energy than the electric pulse itself" is clearer.
Source: I've just been thinking about this for several years.
No, the ether is not just another word for energy. It's a medium that radiant energy flows through.
To be precise, it's the underlining substrate of reality, a non-cartesian dimension of pure potential composed of a gaseous structure.
@@JenkoRuna Ken fan?
@@barrypickford1443 Ya, to a point.
@@JenkoRun This is the problem with parrots. You need to conceive things on your own. Ken would call you the f word for believing the ether is composed of gas or matter itself. How can something be non-Cartesian and a gas at the same time? The ether isn’t made of anything. Matter is a mirage of the ether.
@@FVLMEN I am aware of what parroting is and I am not doing that, you might as well be asking how a non-cartesian dimension exists at all with that question.
We have a non-cartesian dimension, counterspace, already, so what's wrong with it being composed of a non-cartesian substance? I never said it was composed of gross matter did I? I see no issue here.
And if you want to debate *refrain from mocking or insulting me,* I won't entertain that attitude with you.
Excellent video Ivo, thank you for sharing. Here's what catches my attention in your video to explain what the longitudinal magneto dielectric resonant mode is. For your experiment with this resonance mode, you used electro-magnetism, i.e. the electro-inductive force. You explain that the difference between your experiment and Tesla's, who used an electrostatic
electrostatic resonance mode. What I understand from your graph is that, like AC electricity, when a magnet's field line passes through a winding 90° out of phase with it, electricity is produced. If we compare the dielectric lines of force that push on the ether around the winding wire (coil) to those of a magnet's field, we realize that we're getting a 90° phase shift again, which should result in the production of radiant electricity, don't you think Ivo?
Thank you !!
bucking coil is actually the key. to harness induced currrent without impedance.
yes, look to the series connection of a tesla bifilar coil, from that point both windings are bucking.
I think some of Tesla's toroid inventions had CCW + CW winds that are sort of Bucking Coil like - not sure but my guess is those Inventions were essentially Free Power but not spelled out overtly
At 48:55 that is self interference between the different harmonic waves which are non aligned. Both constructive and destructive.....resulting in dissapation maybe?
I had the same thought, it matches up with what Tesla said about there being multiple harmonics of superimposed waves.
Neat. I want the document please. I read really fast and would rather not hear it out loud. Can you please cite your source material so everyone can download it? Thank you sir.
Nikola Tesla 1891 lecture, I'll put it on my website, as there are many versions out on the web without pictures. I'll but the link in the comment section and pin it.
@@MasterIvo Thank you sir, I will look for it :)
In some circumstances, a Tesla coil powered by an electric arc starts to generate static electricity. All surrounding items also become charged. Yes, Tesla knew that there is a difference between static electricity and the oscillating current that produces an electromagnetic field.
Thanks for putting out this video and calling attention to this incredible lecture. Do you fully understand what Tesla is talking about when he says 'conjoint' effect instead of 'differential'? He did not use the same terms that we do today to describe the same effects. Let me know if you need me to elaborate.
please elaborate, in what context did he use that word?
@@MasterIvo Conjoint effect" in the context of an electrostatic field means ta ta da.....scalar. He was saying that the two terminals act together and produced a uniform field. Like the temperature in the room the field is the same everywhere. Scalar.
If the spark discharge is strong enough, a small nuclear explosion occurs at the anode, which creates a blast wave inside the conductor that can be picked up
I had a Tesla patent called The Orgone Generator that he built after going to Egypt that drew power strait from the earth that under testing was said to be 20,000 times more powerful then the power we use today, all for free, I did a video about it on my channel if you want to know more about it.
I will do just that, thank you. I have posted a comment above; I would ask your opinions?
I think why Tesla never mentions Keely is that Tesla never understood music especially on a synthesis level specifically the nature of fm (bessel function & multiplication). Your experiment shows the envelope of a modulator falling off but the fundamental (carrier) is always present. You can't see this from a fourier perspective. The oscilliscope just shows essentially the amplitude (height) of a sphere. It's hard to explain but a sphere has height, width and depth. so you get just 1D over time when you need 3 dimensions.
Tesla himself commented only briefly on Keely in that he knew of the principles but could not understand fully what Keely himself was implementing (not to mention Keely was never the greatest at explaining his inventions as he worked from purely intuition and this while great for inventing makes it poor for getting others to understand what you are doing) not to mention they were utilizing two very different avenues to access the Aether, Keely himself directly utilizing what could be the Tonal aspect of the Aether while Tesla was utilizing more so the electrical. That being said Tesla didn't besmirch Keely's name when everyone else was dragging it through the ground saying that his machines were hoaxes, so there's that.
@@bobdole27 @masterivo I have never come across any written record of Tesla mentioning Keely, if you have this information I would love to check it out. Keely wrote extensively on his work, I don't think it's fare to say he went off intuition. As a scientist and musician/conductor he pulled from the same universal template as Pythagoras, Macrobius, Plato and Boethius which is what gave him the upper hand on Tesla. He was not understood simply becuase you need to understand "Music" as it was taught in the Quadrivium school and prior. He mentions using the 3 6 9 proportions by means of harmonics, octaves and intervals and I don't believe many are able to understand what that really means. Essentially the ratios and proportions he used were arithmetic mean (harmonics eg. 24, 48, 72, 86 etc ), Geometric mean (Octave eg. 24,48, 96,192 etc) and Harmonic Mean (Intervals eg. C-24hz - -D-E-F-G-A-B-(C-48hz) etc ). In that understanding you can use them together in your work and it is what Tesla could never grasp.
I pray you have these videos saved and protected from EMP
Wow my own reply is deleted?
the vids are backed up. and I think you mean ESD instead of EMP!
I want to thank you for your latest effort to increase human energy, as you continue to clearly inform and systematically educate, and in so doing, remove the retarding forces of ignorance and stupidity which haunt us still in this modern day and age.
Hi Ivo 49:45 How to you prevent the reverse polarity flyback of a charged item . Assuming the field collapse is sudden ... ??
if the voltage change is quick enough, the energy will be transmitted away as a longitudinal wave, and thus the oscillation will stop. this needs a low inductance (few turns) primary
@@MasterIvo i was thinking a high impedance coil would give the switch more time to open thus preventing the current from catching up to the voltage ..
17:21 You still don't get it. No offense. But he's simply talking about the harmonic content of waves that aren't perfectly sinusoidal. 16:59 No, he says what kind of waves he's talking about in the same sentence. Note the semicolon "...this giving rise to only one kind of waves; a sudden contact or break." What type of waves? The contact or break type AKA square waves. Actually, any wave that's not perfectly sinusoidal "are essential for the production of superimposed waves." So he's saying sine waves don't inherently produce harmonics. Do we know this to be true? Yes. Waves that have an abrupt contact or break point (square, triangle, sawtooth, anything other than sine) are "essential for the production of superimposed waves (harmonics)." Do we know this to be true? Yes. So you see, you are unnecessarily complicating what he's saying, man.
Well, I see it differently. a sudden contact OR break, not AND like a square wave has.
So after a slow drop, a sudden rise in voltage OR
after a slow rise in voltage a sudden drop in voltage.
You are absolutely right in the production of harmonics, I am very curious how these harmonics can serve us, when tuned to a lower sub harmonic.
My "what are impulses" video might clarify this for you, as the longitudinal fast displacement of energy needs to go in one direction, not back and forth.
ua-cam.com/video/YnijhZdAseA/v-deo.html
So a current impulse is needed from a capacitor diacharge,
not a voltage impulse (or square wave) from a coil discharge.
Why? because we need a net inflow of energy into the conductor, so the load can use it.
that means a fast negative to positive voltage discharge. (and a slow charging of the capacitor to a negative voltage).
Ivo,
(1) Do we go with sawtooth waves now? In the past you were using square waves except in the propulsion video. Is there still a useful benefit of square waves,
(2) I understand using DC to charge capacitor. In the precious video Tuning Dual Resonant I believe used DC on current coil. Is using AC to provide oscillations so that we get the magnetic field for current? Thank you.
Square wave for driving the mosfets
sawtooth for the primary(might need to be combined with parallel resonance)
ac for the secondary.
-hV dc offset could be given to the secondary maybe... need to be tested
Thank you,now we wait for short version and probably instruction for building something?
I'm making a members only recap video with all essential stuff I learned so far in the past 8 years, this topic will included.
When my experiments are giving worthy results I as always will post them on this channel including all necessary info to replicate it.
This follows exactly with Tesla's teleforce concept.
Many clues are hidden and described in this analysis of Tesla's radiant observations.
Amazing!!!!
Is there a way to begin to understand these topics on an introductory basis?
Look the words up and study. that's the way to learn. and I advice to experiment, and learn from the results
Absolutely love your videos! Have you succeeded in any form of over-unity yet, even if very very slightly?
I have been able to bring both current and voltage in phase, which in theory gave overunity of the energy present. But under load it phase shifted again, so no real overunity. working on a method to shift the current back in phase underload. fingers crossed
@@MasterIvo good luck to ya sir!
@@MasterIvo Did you self loop so it can keep running! Aether is ZPE which is 10^93 grams/cc energy density!
Static charges are all around us as well as Having gamma waves at the beginning of lightning passing through the ground up discharge the entire process of ball lightning is a literal vibration of gravity to the point of waves bubbles in the mindset looking at these formations up close and personally I think of them as the new born technology of up down quarks
What do you think of John Bedini's u tube videos? He explains over unity very well, and from what I see his machine functions. thank you this was a great video.
They are good but i would avoid the batteries in it and use HV capacitors instead.
Thanks.
I am familiar with some of those videos. They hold little value to me as they only show resonant effects. I have never seen real usable "overunity" explained in a practical manner, but that is my intention to do once I figure it out.
@@MasterIvo So tesla aetheric streams can cut and machine any surface and laser are no longer needed
The ring up portion happens within the discharge period (plus the 1st resonant peak).
The coil has 3 peaks in that period. I assume as the stimulus positive dv/dt is still present during this initial oscillation, it pushes the amplitude up.
Thoughts?
Its hard for me to say. there is a lot going on, and the measurements aren't precise enough
Tesla also used a physical earth connection
often, but not always
The e field is a hell of a thing
especially when it changes rapidly
the lecture is a long text, time to try again to dive into.
in my view the magnetic component is used as a flux multiplier to drive more current (specifically in bucking mode of output coils), the static component is used to create the electric potential in those coils.
@Master Ivo, I'm sure you have figured out how Tesla's magnifying transmitter worked.
Of course, the technology works. Technology is not the problem. People are the problem.
Knowing how the device works, it reveals other aspects of the electrical nature of our planet. The earth has many electrical layers. The surface and ionosphere are negatively charged. In between those two layers is another layer, which is positively charged. It seems to be the same altitude as the ozone layer, which is at the bottom of the stratosphere.
With these facts in mind, I have determined that the electricity that causes lightning is not generated by clouds, as is the popular belief. The electricity is already up there. Water vapor condenses around the positively charged particles and pulls them towards the earth.
It is not the voltage breaking down the air that causes lightning. It is the rotation of the earth and its magnetic field that compels the positive ions to return upwards. It is magnitomotive force that causes most lightning. (Sometimes the ions can be pushed all the way to the ground and you get what looks like upside-down lightning. )
An interesting fact; like charges normally repell each other but when they move together in the same direction they generate magnetic fields which causes the particles to be deflected towards each other. This forms a filament or bolt.
Of course, it wasn't until 1899 that Tesla accidentally discovered how to pull energy from the electrical layer above us. He does say in his patent that the central coil B does short-circuit when the voltage applied occurs more rapidly than normal. The 3, 6, 9 chord produces a sawtooth waveform, in which the voltage in one part rises very rapidly.
It's such a simple and elegant method of producing a DC impulse with an AC current. Of course, the coil B would have to be non-insulated. That is why he wound the coil on an insulator. It also explains the necessity of the hood at the top of the coil.
Actually the high voltage Sawtooth wave in the low inductance primary produces 3rd harmonics in the secondary, Tesla even worked with higher harmonics.
@MasterIvo That sounds about right. Naturally, the center coil (coil B in the patent) should have the largest inductance so that the voltage could overcome the smaller radius of the turns and behave as a conductor with a diameter of the insulated drum it is wound upon ( in other words, short-circuit).
My dad paid a guy to give him the secret of Tesla's free energy. I think it was Don Smith. He didn't want to my dad directly so he told me as I was only 4 years old. He simply said that it short-circuited. Reading Tesla's patent, that is what Tesla says but in other words.
Congrats, you are getting very close to getting it.. Think more about the dielectric that is between the plates of the capacitor. More specifically, the dielectric that is permeated with the aether. If the aether is Paul Dirac's aether then slow charge and fast discharge (with a positive voltage) will result in a dielectric that has net (but fluctuating) positive charge. If the aether is electrons, then you have succeeded in reducing the net number of electrons (aether) within the dielectric. Got it?
Consider that what you may need is a fast, spark gap type charge (resulting in the dielectric having a asymmetrical pos/neg charge) - then a period of time ( with no connection) to allow the dielectric to equalize - which is does quite naturally in an electron aether). Then slowly discharge the capacitor/dielectric and retrieve the extra electrons added from the aether.
And you're espousing absolute bullshit. If you're on meds I'm sorry and I don't want to offend you but there is zero Truth in anything you just said here.
There is an issue with your idea, Electron particles do not exist. *all* the electrical pioneers (Tesla, Steinmetz, Maxwell, JJ Thomson, Heaviside, etc) rejected this idea of Electron Particles.
@@JenkoRun Yes. Experiments to detect an electron aether that permeates all space and matter have failed and the conclusion was that it does not exist. Now, there is evidence that something exists and is described as mysterious, dark, and even non- baryonic. We are a lot like fish in the ocean trying to detect the presence of water.
Not Electron Aether, electron particles, the electron particle does not exist. Period.
You are correct that the Aether exists, you are wrong that it's made of electrons.
@@asiseeit...6915
Is this a cold manifestation circuit?
a what?
No, to do that you either need a potential difference between negative polarities, no positive voltage potential, or you need tap the center of a resonating tesla coil, like what Old Man Builds is doing.
I believe lightning is only a trigger to the amperage current in the strike . It’s an accumulation of radiant energy as the high tension path is achieved..
A Jacob’s ladder or arc as it grows upwards is the radiant energy accumulation. The initial spark jump was the path of least resistance and the heat build and current is the resultant from the radiant energy. The longer the arc is sustained in dc (not AC frequency, but perhaps I’m not sure) the greater the accumulation effect. In the Jacob’s ladder experiment the flame is divergent from heat rising and heat building..? Isn’t it..?
[20:20] Electrostatic field of force. Can also be known as the concept of teleforce. The single direction of discharge following an electrostatic path. There is another name for this.