Extreme jazz fusion reharmonization
Вставка
- Опубліковано 5 лют 2017
- SUPPORT ME ON PATREON:
/ adamneely
My band sungazer's cover of Jason Derulo that has way, way too many chords.
• Sungazer - Want to Wan...
Knower's kickass cover of Promises. I cannot overstate my love of this band.
• Nero/Skrillex - Promis...
PDF of examples from today's lesson
drive.google.com/file/d/0ByLK...
BACKGROUND MUSIC
sungazermusic.bandcamp.com
Follow me on the interwebs:
/ adamneely
/ its_adamneely
Peace,
Adam - Фільми й анімація
PROTIP: Make sure the synth and the vocals are in the SAME KEY!
THis gotta become a new meme!:))
PROTIP: Make sure the synth and the vocals are NOT in the same key. It's boring when they are.
Songs in the key of synth AND vocals
GNO = music
That's Where You're Wrong Kiddo
ooOOoo tHaTs ᵗʰᵉ J A Z Z
I neEd MOrE J A Z Z
JAAAAAAAAAAAAZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
no but why jaZzZZz
SoOo JaZzZzYyYyBut I don't really understand what's going ooon herrrrrrrre.
I'm literally the 1000th like
Y'all laugh but jazz ruined my life. Its an escalating high. The other night I stole my neighbor's baby grand piano at gunpoint and pushed it down the fire exit stairs just to savor that sweet, discordant tension
Wow, that is so meta to a diatonic dissonance leading to sociopathic harmony.
I WANT THE JAZZZZZZ
It's no wonder that so many of the greats were extreme substance abusers.
use the randomize tool in FL Studio
Mozart did that when he was 4 months old. And that Mozart was, of course, Alber Einstein.
My dream is to fully understand your videos
Same thing here
Me too!!!
Step 1: take theory 1-4
Step 2: pay attention
Step 3: profit (not really, we're jazz musicians ayyo)
after studying a little this video made a lot more sense..not that I can do this myself still but..
he makes things sound way more complecated. it is not soooo complicated .
"Extreme jazz fusion reharmonization of pop music", or, How I got tricked into hearing the first few bars of 'Shape of You' about 1000 times.
Omer Tabach same
Sorry you couldn't appreciate the finesse
An existential nightmare.
A more condensed experience of hearing this song everywhere, everytime
same
This is a fantastically useful video.
One takeaway:
"The more chords you know, the more courage it takes to not play them."
-Jacob Collier.
Adam Dada what
@@adamdadamusic gottem
@@adamdadamusic or maybe the trash one is ur ears :/
@@adamdadamusic u listened to djesse vol.3? U should
@@adamdadamusic ok. You don't like his music. Yes, some of his songs are hectic and experimental (which are still fun to listen to especially for musicians), but he has some unmistakable gems that conform to the simplistic ideas of music that you like. All i need, his most recently released song, broke his record for the number of tracks and yet it is one of his most simplistic and "listenable" songs. Hideaway is also one of his gems. At the end of the day, you don't like his music, which is absolutely fine. I just think some of your criticisms are flawed.
I showed this to my wife (who does not know any music theory) and she said
"So he keeps playing the song but with worse chords each time?"
J A Z Z
😂
This regard sounds horrendous
It's true though! May be the chords could sound better in the context of a well- developed song, but on their own, I don't know their intent. I know Adam is trying to explain a technique here, so it's bound to be a bit artificed, but that's exactly what it is, artificed.
Underrated comment
Ah yes, the classic constant structure major seventh harmony cycled in major thirds across consecutive multi-tonic systems; of course.
The semicolon makes this work.
Lol
I completely absorbed this as a music theory buff, but I'm sure a few people got lost trying to process that, lol.
I for one am fascinated by all of this but can't understand what's going on. I feel really dumb for not catching up fast enough. Some of the arrangements sound great to my ears, but I couldn't reharmonize like Adam does because : theory !
meme what the fuck
John Coltrane's synths were never in the same key as his vocals, smh.
Superimposition
Reharmonisations......
1:45 Original
2:05 Diatonic
2:57 Non-Cyclic
3:36 Varied Harmonic Rhythm
4:13 Added Tensions
4:42 Cycle 5 Progression
5:26 Tritone Substitution
6:38 Chromatic Bassline
8:07 Ascending Bassline
9:17 Mirror Chords
9:50 Multi-Tonic Systems
10:24 12-Tone
Great tutorial Adam!
Ok... I was with it about as far as tritone substitution, just barely. The chromatic basslines sound like shepard tones turned into piano chords, and the avant-garde mirror/multi-tonic stuff is a bridge too far. Apparently this means I appreciate 6/11 jazziness, a suitably weird fraction.
thank you Greg for this summary .. how i can do it in others video that i has considered need that minutes guide.. thank u very mch
If you just type the times as a comment or within your own videos - by default it should generate the links.
Thanks!
No problem at all!
1. Screw music theory
2. Use random chords for maximum Jazz
3. ....
4. PROFIT!
that's essentially what I do when writing
Thats not how it works. Thats not how any of this works.
If only... Somehow we live in a backword world where 4 chords of every pop song and Taylor Swift's one note melodies earn millions while countless hours of self perfection, complicated constructions and practice are underappreciated af
oljenka88 I see what you're saying, but to play devils advocate, the general populace doesn't understand complex jazz structure and it takes like 0 effort to listen and understand pop music.
@lee hamlin u dont understand lol
Step 1: Get a person who never really thought about music theory and make them watch 10:00
Step 2: Look at their face
it looks interesting, just looked in a mirror
Can confirm a person doesn't even have to lack a background in theory to raise an eyebrow.
It will probably be something like 10:47.
The problem is, I am married to the person I just made watch this. I think they feel trapped-there was a genuine horror in their eyes, but they are stuck with me;-)
Just listen John Coltrane's Giant Steps for just that example about multitonic systems
You're like the Vsauce of music.
Mush he said a while ago that that was sort of his intention, so I guess he's succeeding lmao
He doesn't say "...but ... what IS ... chord?"
Alois Mahdal not enough popping up into the frame
Can I just say that your over-use of The Lick for transitions between sections of your videos is awesome? Please never change.
Me: mom, can we have Ed Sheeran?
Mom: No, we have Ed Sheeran at home.
Ed Sheeran at home: 10:25
I'm actually dead
That was my favorite non-functional reharmonization. I'd unironically like to listen how it goes lmao
I'm dead hahahahaha
This one and the multi-tonic one are honestly really great. The 12 tone serial one sounds like a cool boss fight and the multi-tonic one is just another giant steps meme.
Now that's f*ing funny!
7:49 *S T R E S S E D A F*
god I love this channel.
Bravo! You touched on examples from the entire spectrum of harmony pretty much.
Ben Levin do you think J. Coltrane, whilst comping, thought ahead in terms of some/all of these tools? Or used the feel of the moment and the feel of what should come next (expected/deceptive/a surprise) and used the appropriate tool to carry out what he thought the sound should develop into? (Probably yes?)
"The 7 levels of jazz" is basically an update of this
Was thinking the same. As someone who recently saw that video for the first time, I was scratching my chin at how similar they sounded.
@@aqueiro even if the most recent one goes really far in this mindset
I actually think that 2,3, and 7 are the best stages
@@Zantrop64 Yeah I would say that's most people's taste, including my own, judging from the comments. 4 through 6 is reeeeaaaally stretching it for regular folks who are just looking to enjoy a tune.
Having said this, I'm totally hooked on music theory at the moment (I know very little) and I still thoroughly enjoy listening the spicier stuff in the video, perhaps because of the context.
@@aqueiro yeah,i love this but I can't write music for shit
@@Zantrop64 I can tolerate 5, but not 6. 7 however, is heaven.
When I first watched this video I barely liked past the first example. 5 years later, and now the last 2 examples are probably my favorite. Look what you did to me Adam. You did this to me.
I didn't realize Adam doesn't just like Jazz, but "like" likes Jazz.
Well he certainly had his way with this piece of music. Like some kind of deviant. Tonal pornography.
Tonal pornography, so accurate! 😂
so how do you go the other way ? How would you untangle say Coltrane's Interstellar space into a mindless pop song ?
Chris Wilson yes do this turn giant steps into a four chord pop song 😂😂😂😂
Somebody did make "A love supreme" into a hit single in the 80s (though that was a pretty complex piece of pop music, relatively speaking).
My Penis is Made of Dog Shit did a cover of Coltrane's Interstellar Space Sherman Thompson. I know that. I was looking for something more _conventional_ in its execution.
So how would you make it say Happy House, yet have a Coltrane Head say _"Get the fuck out of here ! That's Interstellar Space. Fucking Coltrane's Interstellar Space ! What the....."_
I don't think you can do Mars for example but Venus could be done I think. The beginning is distinct enough and most importantly diatonic, so you could throw some cyclic chords under it, some four on the floor and maybe some very devoted Coltrane fans would get it. But only the beginning works because as soon as he gets out of that diatonic scale you're screwed, so it'd have to be more of a quote. Hope this answers the question in some way. Everything non-diationic is going to proof difficult if you already want to change rhythm and harmony. Unless you have lyrics of course because then you can do all sorts of things and people would still recognize it.
Use the non diatonic stuff in the breakdown Steve Weller. It's an interesting (spelled pointless) challenge, as it will piss off the pureists and most of the rest of the population just wouldn't get it. It would be an inside joke for such a minority.......It's almost worth considering :-)
I remember playing jazz bass back in college, and we had an *amazing* pianist. We were actually auditioning for the top jazz band, and so in a 12-bar blues piece, I opted to do a chromatic scale at measures 11 and 12. The pianist caught what I was doing. We were in C Major, and to this day, 40+ years later, I can still hear that glorious Db chord leading back into bar 1! This video validated my walking bass line in doing the tritone substitution!
Oh wow! That’s awesome. Who’s the cat on keys?
10:25 is awesome. Sounds like Ed Sheeran is a boss in The Legend of Zelda.
Yeah I was thinking of videogame music like that
Somehow my association was "a Borg trying to make music".
Loved those clips of black-&-white Adam orjazzming.
Superb concise presentation Sir! When I studied this stuff in college 40 years ago, it was confusing tedious torture. In contrast, your brief well-organized examples from a single simple melody represent each idea clearly without descending into ponderous pedantry. Your use of technology makes each example immediately accessible to those of us who read music, without alienating those who don't. Bits of humor peppered throughout are pleasant welcome surprises. Excellent in every respect!
Why do you talk like this?
duality of man
It's interesting,
Christmas music is probably one of the few industries where jazz re-harmonization thrives (to a certain extent), even to the extent that it may be the standard.
The striking chord changes may be disturbing to the layman's ear.
Maybe it just sucks. If you have to learn to like something is it really good?
borggus: I guess it’s like wine-tasting; first time you have alcohol in general it tastes awful… but that doesn’t mean alcoholic drinks suck; it’s just an acquired taste. I find crazy chords exciting to listen to, but I understand why most people would prefer a simple four-chord structure.
+borggus Some of the listeners of more complicated genres just find pleasure in hearing the application of theory as they listen.
@@rynabuns I guess it's like piss tasting; first tiime you drink piss in general it tastes awful... but that doesn't mean piss sucks; it's just an acquired taste.
lmao its a reference to adam neely's video about the national anthem
I actually found the 12-tone version really nice and not alienating at all.
you reached musical peak wokeness
iLikeTheUDK this comment is so fucking funny when its out of context
The twelve tone version rocked. I agree
shit's fucking rocket science
yeah. i thought i knew some stuff about music. and i just had no idea what he was talking about 5 minutes into the video. like whaaaaaat
Same ._.
2:06 OK, that's interesting...
2:58 This sounds pretty cool.
3:36 Now I'm really starting to enjoy this!
4:13 Uhh... we're almost there, but not quite
4:43 There we go! Love it!
5:27 Wait, what are you doing
6:38 No stop
8:08 I SAID STOP
9:18 ADAM YOU'RE HURTING ME
9:51 WHY
10:25 WHYYYYYYY
The second and third tritone at the tritone subs part sound nice to me, but after that, I don't really like it anymore. Appreciate the skill though!
But the later ones have more S P I C E
mister.nimoe furry reee :p
Loogaroo The one at 6:38 with the descending chromatic bassline (essentially an extended line cliché) is honestly my favourite. Adventurous on a structural level but also perfectly consonant and a bit dreamy. I also think that the last three have some potential if they were appropriately orchestrated; the piano alone is really too blunt a timbre to carry across the interaction of mirror chords with such a straightforward sung melody, and it gets particularly harsh with the tone row version, which is already very tense and aggressive. The multi-tonic system one kinda works, though? Although the three from your favourite to mine are a lot stronger in terms of balancing spice with catchiness.
@@ConvincingPeople I'll admit that I don't hate the descending chromatic in principle; there are definitely songs that carry it off quote well, although they tend to be a little more obvious about keeping the bassline consistent with the melody (Usually in a i-V-i7-IV-VI♭ progression to start). It doesn't work here though. The earlier progressions sound like they're working in partnership with the melody; the descending chromatic is really the first one that makes it sound like the bassline and the melody are just operating independently of each other.
the grey Adam should have a name,
Adam Durden
Jazz realy is like smoking; you start of with a hookah pipe (a few minor 7th chords in a song or some catchy jazz licks, looped in hip hop), then a cigarette follows (a full jazz song, probably some smooth jazz or swing music) and before you know it you're blowing away fatty's like it's no thing (Parker, Mingus, Coltrane, ...). And then there are those sad cases of heroin users, completely isolated from all that is happening around them; free ja.. I mean heroin, however doesn't look like a fun activity to outsiders, but man are those junkies enjoying themselves.
PRO TIP: According to a lot of the performing artists themselves, the jazz equivalent of heroin, free jazz, seems to pair quite well with actual heroin. Ha!
Brocht Vasquez . I love this comment.
Brocht Vasquez I used to be a free jazz addict. 5 months clean now. Its been tough but I know that its just for the best
There's a 12-step program for players addicted to free jazz, it's called "Standards Anonymous". The first step is acknowledging there's a higher harmony.
Gold comments folks, just wanna mention the specific feeling of time freeze which heroin is known for and just might be something about it which folks like Parker may have looked for before kicking from his altered universe into the alto sax. There is something hydraulic about his playing. Cold
No drug apology was intended
but if I just pick up a guitar and play, I'll figure this all out on my own, right?
yeah, reconstructing 400 years of harmony developed by hundreds of thousands of musicians and composers by yourself is totally doable!
Adam Neely anyways, here's wonderwall
Hah
Right...
Maybe if you don't get stuck on triads, maybe.
Been a fan for a while and just found this. As a self-teaching theory nerd, this is hands down your best video, which is saying a lot.
Ikr? This video slit my head open regarding musical harmony, and largely introduced me to the marvelous world of understanding and enjoying jazz harmonies expressed across many genres.
I fucking love this video, for short.
I’m in love with the tritone subs at 5:26
They push and pull like a magnet do
I mean tritone subs are nice and all but you can't deny the superior of the 12-tone row, right?
This is my favorite video by far. I wouldn't mind the least bit if you made a series of reharm videos
Yes, please!
Sure thing
DrZaius Yeah, I enjoyed and mostly followed this video. More would be so highly appreciated.
The 12 Tone Row at 10:40..... Loved it!
Not only is Adam Neely an incredibly talented musician and arranger. His vids are so utterly entertaining and well laid out. Way to go Adam!
As a professor (and an amateur drummer), I want to thank you for making these ideas acceptable, clear, and interesting. Keep up the great work.
This is phenomenal! Probably the most succinct explanation I've ever seen of some pretty complex techniques.
uh... what???
same
this is like a vsauce video but you need to study for years after watching it to actually really understand
this is more to get people interested in the subject
Adam: “Good friend of the channel Béla Bartók”
Béla Bartók: Died September 26th, 1945
Ezra Schell
That’s the power of jazz. You can listen to Adam Neely in your grave
Yeah...that was the joke...
@@l_ndonmusic not just to your grave but well past it!
No Shit! He's dead?!
This video gave my band an album idea (we’re now doing a jazz fusion pop reharmonization album), as well as teaching me the beauty of the tritone substitution, which I really wish I had learned about sooner. It’s great.
This was great! Examples and ideas spot on!
Thank you very much!
Hi jens
@@ColocasiaCorm How's it going John!
Best jazz teacher in youtube
Very cool! I'll have to rewatch this one a couple of times and explore some of those concepts you mention. Not a jazz musician by any stretch of the imagination(durr metal), but I really dig the sounds of this reharmonisation. Jarring, maybe, but oh so satisfying. I'll have to go listen to Fredrik Thordendals Special Defects again now, tho.
yeah, a lot of the more adventurous metal guys definitely have explored this stuff in detail. I, admittedly, haven't checked out a lot of that stuff, but it's certainly out there. Ron Jarzombek is a guy I know who loves that 12-tone.
I personally think Thordendal is a genius. People often refrence this, but he takes quite a lot from Alan Holdsworth in his solos, but I think that proves he has a clear vision of what he's doing. If you are unsure, I'd suggest to check out Alan, it might help to get a clearer picture!
Best wishes!
Agreed, he seems to have an idea where he's going with things. Theres just no way he's just been lucky all these years, haha.. Him having played with Mads Öberg and Morgan Ågren sements it in my book. Whether or not he's thinking in classical theory or just through being self-taught and going by ear and shapes on the fretboard, he knows what he's doing.
I don't actually know if he's into theory or not, but I know 'it.. move' :D
LambdaReion metal inspired me to learn to play bass but it is abstract stuff like the material covered in this video that made jazz my primary musical interest. if you start down this rabbit hole you'll end up becoming a jazz musician
Go check Stolas, Dance Gavin Dance and The Fall of Troy if you wanna hear some cool jazz chords.
I really appreciate that you make these videos. They are very complex and while they are short, they lead to an epic of learning. I like that you don't neccesarily dumb things down, while you do try to explain, you keep the musical terms and make it easy for us to get an idea while still not watering it down so that we can further research it. Keep it up, as a non-musician/mathematician, I find them extremely entertaining as well as enlightening.
Found out today that the original "PROTIP" comment was apparently deleted :(
אוף באתי לפה כדי לראות אותה גם
i think it's here (the account's username changed) ua-cam.com/video/PC3kcL37Ivs/v-deo.html&lc=Ugx4Y79QAiedReFuGyV4AaABAg
edit: you have to copy&paste (or highlight and right-click "go to") the actual link above because UA-cam is stupid, otherwise the Highlighted Comment won't show up
Hnnggg I want that jazz, give me the JAAAAZZZ!
Werner, you follow me everywhere
stop stalking my music taste
Nice use of the lick ;)
Sham Maárif yeah i noticed it too how he always used "the lick"
It's so refreshing
What is "the lick"?
wait where i didnt see it dam
badman jones it's literally everywhere in the video😂
The twelve tone row harmony is sick, I love it.
Oh yeah, that's that jazz! I want that jazz. I want MORE jazz!
ahaha "good friend of the channel, Bela Bartok..."
Best fucking video, humor, curiosities, simple explainations, and the best JAZZY HARMONIES OOOOH YEAH
If I were Sheeran, I'd be really sad listening to the version at 3:38... Because it sounds soooooo much better than his own.
Some of it does but the rhythm of the vocal doesn't work with it very well.
Maybe to you, but they were written for different purposes and for different instrumentation. Ed Sheeran's version was written for vocals, synth marimba, guitar and percussion, and was written mostly to be catchy and appealing to wide audiences. Adam's version was written for vocals with piano accompaniment, and was written to demonstrate how chord progressions could be made more colourful with more variety. (Let's also not forget that, for the sake of simplicity in terms of music theory, Adam transposed the song up a half-step. The intention was probably to reduce accidentals in the key signature, but it also happens to make the whole thing sound a little brighter as well.) My question is, would the original composition still accomplish its original purpose, especially with the change in instrumentation? I doubt that very much. Take, for example, the change in harmonic rhythm introduced in bar 4 of Adam's arrangement. This change in harmonic rhythm is not compatible with Ed's composition due to the fact that the synth marimba does not fall on the fourth beat of the bar. It would be odd to change the rhythm of the harmony to where the marimba plays (i.e. the 16th note upbeat before count 3) as we would not switch chords on the next marimba hit (the 8th note upbeat before the next bar) so it would sound unbalanced. The only solution is, therefore, to remove the change in harmonic rhythm, in other words... we're back to the original. The fact that the harmonic rhythm could not be changed was a direct product of the instrumentation, and I'm guessing the choice of the instrumentation was to make it catchy (just a guess don't kill me). So yeah, the chord changes presented in Adam's example literally could not be used in the original composition because they were written for different purposes. Which one appeals to you more in this case isn't relevant, because it's not really possible to compare them.
sheeran is trash
@@bensblues Im sure a hyper popular and succesful millionaire will be really sad that some random youtube commenter thinks that he is trash lol.
@@luuk341 you think I'm the only one who thinks he's trash? Anyone who knows the slightest about music history knows that he and everyone else on the charts are dreadful musicians. Since when did wealth make people better people or even musicians?
This video was uploaded almost two years ago and since then I've watched it a bunch of times. Always managed to learn something new every time I come back
After enough alterations it gets to be all tension and no release - maybe useful for a limited effect, but... So much depends on expectation and willingness to go along for the ride. Theory is a way of understanding what happened, not necessarily a good way to make things (music) happen, if you know what I mean. Great video.
As many have put it: music theory is descriptive, not prescriptive.
Very, very interesting. Doesn't it eventually become a question of whether or not you care what an audience/listener thinks about what you're doing? Coltrane respected his listeners in "My Favorite Things" by frequent reiterations of the melody. This helped to broaden the appeal of this innovative interpretation, and it became his most requested tune.
Patrick Fitzgerald yes! There are even 3 versions of it and Naima in Giant Steps deluxe!
Adam - I feel like I learn a dozen things from each of your videos. Amazing that a single person can bring so much value to the process of learning and to the creative community.
Adam, thank you for teaching me music. This particular video has taught me so much, and I come back more and more (and I'm using this for writing chords for original melodies). You do much for the world.
First five minutes: hmmm wow yeah this is cool I get that
10 min in: w t f
three words: food for thought.
5:27 was awesome!
Toby Bromfield For me it's the best reharmonization in the video.
As he said, "Oh yeah, thats the jazz!"
Yea, this one is my favourite, too.
I am utterly in love with your channel. I find you super informative and entertaining, and your calm confidence make the information easy to digest. Have a subscribe, sir.
Been subbed for a few months now and I have watched many of your videos. I've gotten a lot from all of them and I wouldn't say I have a favorite, however this video is very relevant to where I'm at in my musical journey and I could and probably will apply a lot of this. It's interesting because nothing here is new to me, but the examples and explanations were just stellar and quite frankly, inspirational at a time in my life where inspiration has been incredibly difficult to find. So thank you and bravo! I love the way your brain works!
This was bloody fascinating.
Somewhere in the middle, I could no longer understand the theory of what you were doing and so the music stopped being pleasant to my ears.
I completely get why someone (such as yourself) would like such a thing, whereas others (like me) essentially lack the vocabulary to process it.
It's also interesting to learn that Ed Sheeran is almost tolerable when he sounds like Steely Dan.
ya like jazz?
Love it
This is the first video of you I've seen and I enjoyed it a lot, not because your humour, but the decisions and examples you've made. Congrats
This was an incredible pattern feast. The 'multi-tonic systems' example at 9:52 was so beautiful. AND the delishious jazz chords parts in black and white were hilarious. Congratulations on what you've created.
hey dude, can you do a micro tonal video? Check out Ron Sword too, he has written a bunch of theory books in different tone scales.
Kyle Ganger this
Kyle Ganger this [2]
Kyle Ganger this [?]
What kind of twisted freaks are you people? Damn these micro-tones straight to HELL!!
Wot
Remember the To Do List from the odd time signature vid?
Now you should check off "Jazz harder than anyone has jazzed before"
Man !! I can only say thanks to such an effort, what you explain is truly dense and that's not as easy as it seems to explain it so clearly. Now we are left with a lot of work and practice to do to get to the point were we can intuitively integrate this knowledge into our compositions.
Extreme Lesson; although this is above my skill level, you’ve(as usual)explained it in a way I was able to wrap my head around. I enjoy watching lessons above my level of playing as they provide something to strive towards. Also when the instructor loves music as much as yourself I am always able to find something in an advanced lesson that I am able to utilize in my playing.
Keep them coming.
Haha. Cool. They sound like Bill Wurtz's songs.
The Naked Ant knock knock, its jazz fusion
I would love to see an Adam Neely video on Bill Wurtz's style. I mean, i guess this was sort of it right here, but there's just something so distinct about those harmonies that I can't articulate.
Bill Wurtz is my muzical hero, holy shit. I always lump Bill into the same harmonic category as Dirty Loops etc., but he's also got this amazing cheesy-commercial-slash-elevator-music thing going on that just gets me so hard.
Wait, what's the genre of bill wurtz's songs?
YES
I barely know how to read music, this was way over my head, and I'm pretty tone-deaf on top of all that. I have no idea how youtube took me here, but I still found this video really fascinating and informative.
I'm so sorry about your situation of being a tone-deaf. But I'm just curious of it. How do you hear music/song/tone? Is it all flat or there still a variation of pitch but you just can't identify it? Thanks for the answer!
I'm so sorry about your situation of being a tone-deaf. But I'm just curious of it. How do you hear music/song/tone? Is it all flat or there still a variation of pitch but you just can't identify it? Thanks for the answer!
Gotta give credit where it's due. This video goes over a lot of content and explains it very clearly and concisely. I especially appreciated the short and sweet description of a tritone substitution.
Adam,
You are truly an outstanding presenter. You do something that is important--you have fun, so you entertain yourself along the way. This approach keeps youself interested which in turn keeps your audience's attention. Finally your pacing is right.
I want to open a bar and night club with very strict yet simple music policy: Only multi-tonic music is allowed. Cocktail menu will have a Vincent Persichetti quote ("Any tone can succeed any other..." / "...successful projection will depend..." / "...upon the skill and soul of the bartender") and the guests must whistle Giant Steps to a mic to unlock the restroom door. Should I have this in Helsinki or in NYC?
Why not both?
*JAZZ CHORDS*
That had me so hard
Dear Adam,
thank you for your amazing videos. I discovered your channel a couple of month ago and learned so much from you since then.
The lesson I will take away from this video: after exhausting the theoretical possibilities, just listen to your music and you will find new ways to spice things up "by heart".
All the best.
Oh my goodness, the bit with Coltrane and juxtaposed YT rants is HILARIOUS, my cheeks are sore! Adam Neely, I love you to bits!
TOO MUCH VALUABLE INFORMATION IN A SINGLE UA-cam VIDEO! CAN'T TAKE IT ANYMORE!
STRESSED AF!
Adam, you explained this topic so well. Thank you. I do hope any musicians struggling wih arranging and reharmonizing watch this video. It is very beautifully made. 👌💯
i come back to this video every now and then to see how much more i can understand of it
Thank you for introducing me to Dirty Loops. Weren't The Bad Plus doing this even earlier with, for example, "We Are the Champions" in 2005? Not that there needs to be a Who did it first ? arms race.
Like I said, this has been done MANY times before Dirty Loops - it's just that the younger generation will probably be more familiar with them than anybody else.
+Adam Neely The bad plus did smells like teen spirit which is glorious AF IMHO, no pun intended. I was wondering if you knew The Bad Plus. Just found your channel, you earned my sub, thank you
love your videos adam. they are fun and entertaining and we learn stuff. imho the key acomplishment of dirty loops is the TASTEFUL reharmonisation of songs which differs from the typical 251-gospel way to do things - which i also like. AND they created an album with NO rhodes and NO organ but with ugly pop dance sounds and made the most beautiful production with it and created a new style AND sound of pop music. i love them so much. peace
Why doesn't every school have a teacher like you? This helped soooooooo much. Going to do this to tori kelly's songs
Good friend of the channel, Bela Bartok...Love it. this whole video is pure gold.
12:28
😂😂😂
social media disses John Coltrane
ftw. subscribed.
"Good friend of the channel, Béla Bartók" made my day, great video altogether, please do more like this one!
Bela Bartok sent me here.
I liked how you showed how you showed how different techniques would sound over one melody. Some of the harmonizations were too far out but knowing what it was based on may come handy sometime.
this is so helpful for turning a simple chord prog into something more complex by just following the tonic
My Favourite Things
8:31
"No. Sort of, but mmmmmm not really"
this is so memeable
If only Vine wasn’t dead, this clip could really go places
@@sapphic_sophie Tiktok
Sorry, scared souls, for I have sinned.
Your videos make me (re)appreciate music
Wow! The best explanation of chord choices I've ever seen! Thank you so much!
That is what I was searching for. Thanks so much :)
Hi Adam, what's up with the subtle dial-up internet connection noises in the background? Is that how cavemen did dithering? Awesome video btw!
love coming back to these videos after having learned a little more of the theory, they're super entertaining as a novice, just watching a song get mangled "does it blend" style, but even moreso when you can actually parse statements like "an example of constant-structure major 7 harmony cycled in major 3rds across multi-tonic systems"