This is the fastest acceleration 0-100 I have ever seen in youtube (for CHR 2.0lt ofcourse), with the closest being at ~8secs. I would guess that this was performed in a slight downslope?
11,1 and 13,7 liter are everything just not good and excellent at 160&180kmh!!it is condumotion on the level of much bigger and stronger suvs and vehicles
@@Mr11ESSE111 I know, You have diesel engines with same displacement and same or more power that are more efficient than this engine at higher speeds. I suspect that the car is too heavy for this engine with all that extra weight because of the hybrid system.
@@Mr11ESSE111 VW onboard computer numbers are fake, VW cheating as always, countless tests have proven they show lower numbers than actual consumption. Just take a look at the small difference between 160 and 180 kph, that makes no sense physically, simple physics is that fuel consumption increases exponentially with speed, the VW bord computer just refuses to show numbers above 10l to fool the driver.
I observed a lot of hybrids. The total power claimed is only at low and medium speeds. At higher speeds the electric engine "wears off" and only termic engine is strugling. But the termic engine only has low power and after 160, 170 hybrids are weak and top speed usually stops at 180, 190 km/h
Nope, in fact even at high speed the electric motor still assist the petrol engin (when we look at the control screen). The reason why the top speed is limited is because the rotation speed of the electric motor which indeed stop assist the petrol engin at the top speed (here around 180km/h). The way to get ride of that top speed limiter is to add a "gear ratio" like in the Lexus GS 450h for example .. which can exceed 250km/h
![TOYOTA C-HR 2.0 DFH GR SPORT 2022 FL | POV DRIVE 4K [0-100]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/GlqhaXZXP7o/mqdefault.jpg)
![TOYOTA C-HR 2.0 DFH GR SPORT 2022 FL | POV DRIVE 4K [0-100]](/img/tr.png)
Very nice Car and such a beautiful design 🤩
Kind of quite fast acceleration 👍
This is the fastest acceleration 0-100 I have ever seen in youtube (for CHR 2.0lt ofcourse), with the closest being at ~8secs. I would guess that this was performed in a slight downslope?
no it was in very flat road from Frankfurt to Mannheim Autobahn, you can measure elevation level on google earth or another maps
@@TESTDRIVEFREAK well, very happy to hear that. I knew that my car felt quick, just wasn’t sure how quick!
It was probably because of the traction control
Or back wind
Hey there what is that button between lane departure and adaptive cruise control's distance button?
Great city car with excellent fuel economy even on the motorway, as long as you dont push it over 120 km/h.
Yes, I have smaller consumption over 140 km/h at my car which is turbo petrol, no hybrid. Same capacity and power, 2.0 litres with 184 HP.
11,1 and 13,7 liter are everything just not good and excellent at 160&180kmh!!it is condumotion on the level of much bigger and stronger suvs and vehicles
@@Mr11ESSE111 That is why I said not to push it over 120 km/h, up to that speed fuel economy is very good.
@@bradulovic82 for others are same thing too but others can do better at higher speeds too
@@Mr11ESSE111 I know, You have diesel engines with same displacement and same or more power that are more efficient than this engine at higher speeds. I suspect that the car is too heavy for this engine with all that extra weight because of the hybrid system.
CVT power!! Very nice SUV, unconventional (design-wise) and these hybrids are very good!
No LED tail lights at the rear , Its not a 2021 Model
Look at the rear number between 2018 and 2021 and compare it, the LED Light is in higher trim level or upgrade options
11 L at 160 that's shet.
Prius 3 is only 7 Liter at that speed.
Hermoso diseño!!! Me encantó!!! 👍👍👍👍
acceleration is good but consumption are only good at lower speeds which are bad considering it is 2 liter 184 in relative small size suv body
name any other gasoline powered SUV with lower fuel consumption at high speeds...
@@Mgoblagulkablong almost all suvs what exist are better and you can check tiguan 2.0 tfsi 190hp on this channel or x3,x1 bmw 184hp ....
@@Mr11ESSE111 VW onboard computer numbers are fake, VW cheating as always, countless tests have proven they show lower numbers than actual consumption. Just take a look at the small difference between 160 and 180 kph, that makes no sense physically, simple physics is that fuel consumption increases exponentially with speed, the VW bord computer just refuses to show numbers above 10l to fool the driver.
@@Mgoblagulkablong you think that other dont cheats!? everybody showing 10-20% lower numbers and that means toyota eats more too
I observed a lot of hybrids. The total power claimed is only at low and medium speeds. At higher speeds the electric engine "wears off" and only termic engine is strugling. But the termic engine only has low power and after 160, 170 hybrids are weak and top speed usually stops at 180, 190 km/h
Nope, in fact even at high speed the electric motor still assist the petrol engin (when we look at the control screen).
The reason why the top speed is limited is because the rotation speed of the electric motor which indeed stop assist the petrol engin at the top speed (here around 180km/h).
The way to get ride of that top speed limiter is to add a "gear ratio" like in the Lexus GS 450h for example .. which can exceed 250km/h
nonsense, top speed is lmited artificially bc of electric motor temps to keep wear low
ua-cam.com/video/3bSB_TdBA8A/v-deo.html
I would sacrifice my new born baby for this car
Why are these hybrids so terrible at fuel consumption after 80 km/h ?? Makes no fucking sense.
5.8 in an suv at higway speed
is it really that bad ?
4.1 at 100km/h
Everything sounds like thin, creaky plastic.
I like the car, but I couldn't live with the low-rent feel.