It's a bo3 deck, look at the sideboard. Its full of em. lol It's a design choice, in today's standard its a completely viable choice just to try to goldfish game 1 and then play reactive game 2. It does have 4 annie joins up, which is technically a removal spell. lol
@manaintolerantmage yes I saw them in the sideboard which is not helpful in Game 1. In the current format/meta I just do not agree with that choice. To each their own but some of those losses I think could be prevented
@@cwjustcw1261 It's survivorship bias. You aren't seeing the games this deck loses to having a hand gunked up with removal against control or whatever. (Which control is EVERYWHERE these days). Magic is about concessions, Kibler decided to just smorc game 1. Perfectly viable choice. It's an older magic philosophy that still does reasonably well, just play a threat everyturn until your opponent can't answer 1. You don't run that much maindeck removal in monored for a reason. Don't let the manacosts fool you, this is an aggro/midrange deck that profits most from synergy and turning sideways. That being said, you could i dunno... drop the Hazzy's and add some Roxanne's or something. They double as removal
Glad to see a Brian "Don't Call Me "Brian "Brian Kibler" Kibler" Kibler classic on the channel
Featured by Jim “Not Garfield Jim Davis” Davis
i was screaming at the TV when jim was about to put the counter on the dragon in match 1 making it too big to kill with the annie joins up
No Roxanne in an Annie joins up deck is craaazy
Probably better than Djeru and Hazoret in my opinion
I played against a version with Pia and Etali, there's like a million legends in those colors
Let's be honest, Roxanne is a commander card not a standard card. You don't really need to ramp once you hit 5 mana in standard lol
Saccing bodyguard to give two 3 power creatures +1/+0, thereby getting 2 additional dragon triggers for lethal was a sick play.
Rocco Street Chef is one of my favorite cards, love to see them doing work in Standard after playing with them as my commander for a while.
Not a huge fan of these legends decks but tried Kibbler's deck when I saw his tweet. It's pretty fun! Good games and vid thanks jim.
Why not include the 4/3 that makes oxen instead of hazoret?
Só why was the first game in which he salt ropes 2 games?
Anni joins up.
Halla.
I run phage, Annie joins. Reanimate for historic.
Fun stuff
!
Not liking the lack of removal spells
It's a bo3 deck, look at the sideboard. Its full of em. lol
It's a design choice, in today's standard its a completely viable choice just to try to goldfish game 1 and then play reactive game 2. It does have 4 annie joins up, which is technically a removal spell. lol
@manaintolerantmage yes I saw them in the sideboard which is not helpful in Game 1. In the current format/meta I just do not agree with that choice. To each their own but some of those losses I think could be prevented
@@cwjustcw1261 It's survivorship bias. You aren't seeing the games this deck loses to having a hand gunked up with removal against control or whatever. (Which control is EVERYWHERE these days). Magic is about concessions, Kibler decided to just smorc game 1. Perfectly viable choice. It's an older magic philosophy that still does reasonably well, just play a threat everyturn until your opponent can't answer 1. You don't run that much maindeck removal in monored for a reason. Don't let the manacosts fool you, this is an aggro/midrange deck that profits most from synergy and turning sideways. That being said, you could i dunno... drop the Hazzy's and add some Roxanne's or something. They double as removal
@@cwjustcw1261yea man you know better than a hof and 1 of best magic players of all time lmao
@ziegfeld4131 sorry that only one opinion is ok for you. By the way did he win every match? NO. Guess there is room for improvement.