Valmont Official Trailer #1 - Colin Firth Movie (1989) HD
Вставка
- Опубліковано 29 вер 2024
- Subscribe to TRAILERS: bit.ly/sxaw6h
Subscribe to COMING SOON: bit.ly/H2vZUn
Subscribe to CLASSIC TRAILERS: bit.ly/1u43jDe
Like us on FACEBOOK: goo.gl/dHs73
Follow us on TWITTER: bit.ly/1ghOWmt
Valmont Trailer - A scheming widow (Annette Bening) and her aristocratic lover (Colin Firth) make a bet that he can seduce a chaste young woman (Fairuza Balk) who is engaged to be married.
MGM - 1989
As much as I loved Dangerous Liaisons, I found Valmont far more accurate and emotionally deeper despite its apparent superficiality .
Colin Firth here was soooo young! Try BBC´s Pride and prejudice...Oh my God!!!!!!! Handsomeee
He is more handsome here.
Both places
Firth irresistible💜😎😊🎊
Saw this years ago before I even knew his name. Such a handsome Colin Firth.
I absolutely love this movie. Just watched it again last night. It is totally funny brilliant and beautiful. Colin Firth is irresistible.
Have you seen Dangerous Liaisons 1988 version of this movie?
@Mad Mark Haven't seen Valmont yet but I think it has some value. That's why I asked about Dangerous Liaisons.
@Mad Mark It's not a knock off you idiot. They are based on the same source material, from the 18th century. Get educated.
You should watch Dangerous Liaisons 1988 it is the best version of the book.
@@girlonthemovie I did watch DL (1988), and yet, Valmont (1989) is still the best IMO.
Oh ! 4 reasons : Colin Firth, Annette Bening, Fairuza Balk and of course, Milos Forman.
Colin Firth is an a great actor...and such a personality!
Фильм просто потрясающий! Посмотрите и не пожалеете!!!
Colin Firth and Meg Tilly had a child after making this movie 0:30
People who commenting that this movie is better than dangerous liaison must be blind both are great movies with such incredible actors both of the movies are superior to crual intention for sure but both of them are equal ..just stop it
Both are great movies and all are great actors but Dangerous Liaisons was so much more superior to this one. I first saw Dangerous Liaisons when it came out and I absolutely loved the movie. When Valmont came out a year later, I couldn't bare to watch the movie, I thought it was so bad. Of course, it wasn't bad but I couldn't help to compare. I saw it years later and finally understood the popularity of this movie. But I stil lfound it be rather mediocre compared to the other one.
@@fluffy9592 yes i agree even i dont know why Glenn close didnt get the oscar she was robbed for sure
@@Chamskyes, she was absolutely outstanding in this role. She deserved the Oscar.
I actually like this one way more than Dangerous Liaisons. Annette Bening's Merteuil felt more natural in her deceitfulness and machinations; charming, not obvious like Glenn Close's. Don't get me wrong, Glenn Close is a phenomenal actress and she was brilliant in Dangerous Liaisons, but I felt Bening's Merteuil was "sweetly evil" and able to get under the skin of undetecting people she wants to exploit or milk for information. Firth was great, but I liked Malkovich's Valmont. As far as Cecille and Danceny go, they were more suited to their book ages and had the naivety of it, not to mention it was more believable in contrast to Uma Thurman and Keanu Reeves. This movie is definitely warmer on the surface and while its costumes are less extravagant and less accurate at times, to me it's the more preferable movie on the book. But I like both movies.
It was very interesting for me to watch both films, each with a different take on the same story. While I found Valmont to be more entertaining, I thought Dangerous Liaisons was more complex in its exploration of love, ego, manipulation, and evil, but I guess that was to be expected, given the older characters in the latter probably should be more cynical than the younger characters in the former. The most interesting thing I found had to do with the character of Valmont. While with Firth's version, you got the charming playboy who was believable as a seductress, Malkovich's Valmont, while lecherous and sinister, seduced the women with his bad boy magnetism.
I think we can all agree both films are preferable to Cruel Intentions.
@@johanvajse8410 no
Yes. This is the best ever ! For all the reasons you say. Do you write also ? Friendly.
It's a shame that "Dangerous Liaisons" and "Valmont" were released back to back, as the two adaptations are too different tonally to compare them fairly. While "Liaisons" is straight-up melodrama, "Valmont" portrays the characters as frivolously amoral. In my opinion, the latter deserves more credit for depicting the kind of "let them eat cake" attitude typically associated with the pre-revolutionary French aristocracy.
I love how he playing dead and fell into the water oooowh :3 top cute
Fantastic movie, a wonderful vision of the novel!
It's so unright that Alan Rickman was never chosen to play Valmont in a film. He was the only one who could have played him in a believable way, because he is as irresistible and charming as Valmont.
Potter, leave me alone to reclaim lady McGonagall. Wingardiunbefucked.
😂😂
Happy 51st Birthday to Henry Thomas! (September 9, 2022). Forever Elliott! Forever my 7 year old childhood crush. I love you!
One of the expensive and unprofitable films that bankrupted Orion, the "director's studio"
This movie is okay, I prefer Dangerous Liaisons more to this movie
Boring romantic trailer 1 star vs average movie 3 star 🙄🙄🙄
Good trailer 4 star vs good movie 3 star punjabi movie confirm rating star 2.5 star 🙄🙄🙄
Colin Firth is absolutely irresistible !
For a director of the calibre of Milos Forman this movie was embarrassingly weak. I think the casting was off and the script didn’t do the least bit of justice to the original. I found Dangerous Liaisons superior in every way, especially the script and the actors’ performances. Collin Firth is sweet but Malkovich was a much better Valmont. This one fell completely flat for me.
Anette is better in the role because she is playful, feminine, alluring, flirtatious, Glen is a disappointed, hard, sour woman
Don't get me wrong, "Dangerous Liaisons" is a superb film, but I would argue that it takes itself a bit too seriously for a story about pre-revolutionary French aristocrats. The melodramatic tone of that adaptation is clearly a reflection of the English director and Hollywood cast. As talented as they all are, I can't imagine Glenn Close's and John Malkovich's characters realistically belonging in France during the period as much as I can see Annette Bening's and Colin Firth's versions fitting right in at Louis XVI's frivolous court.
Очень тронул этот фильм. Он очень красив. Великолепно исполнил главную роль прекрасный Колин Фёрт. Несмотря на то, что книгу, по которой снята картина, я не читала и не собираюсь читать.
I am Czech, as well as the director of the movie, and I just love how they pronounce his name in this trailer. Sounds so cute to my ears.
Haven't seen this movie yet though.
Might need to... Haha
It may come stupid after 5 months, but I love Czech Republic and Miloš Forman too! One flew over the cuckoo's nest is one of my favs, along with Amadeus. I watched him work as an actor too in Heartburn.
I just got it on Blu-ray
NO TO SE MÁŠ ČÍM CHLUBIT...
This is why I love people from Eastern Europe! If this comment were from a Brit or an Australian, they would be offended and complain about how stupid it was for the name to be mispronounced lol. Eastern Europeans (or at least the ones I’ve known) are so much more down to earth and seem to take life in a much better stride without all the pettiness of their western neighbors😄
Loved the movie
This movie is so much better than liaisons dangereuses… you immediately recognise the signature of Amadeus’ creator. Great actors, superb music, poetic photography, refined story of delicious decadence, beautiful dresses… lovely touches of humor… Colin Firth is just irresistible… the pond, the duel…in fact, everywhere.
A lovely painting… in sharp contrast with the almost embarrassing decadence of liaisons dangereuses. (and an overacting G.Close and J.Malkovitch)
I love both movies
This version was definitely good, but very different from the other version of the story.
Not a patch on Dangerous Liaisons!
Brilliant. Indispensable ! ( No, women never stop ! )
I just bought it on Blu-ray
I loved this movie , one of the best I have ever seem, so sad it should be dusted off for all to see.
Обожаю этот фильм!!!!
Love the Orion film company though
American accent in the movie of French novelist? I expected more of Meg Tilly...
Nobody minded the American accents in Amadeus...but they were all meant to be Austrian. Or Italian.
Who cares? If they wanted such pedantic accuracy, the cast wouldn't be speaking English at all.
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
awesome and eye opening.
1:59 🔥🔥💃💛
👇 👇💛
This came out a year after „dangerous liaisons“ right?
Why though? That was flawless. I’ll check this one out too though
@LadyStarkgaryen I hope you do. I've seen both versions, and while Dangerous Liaisons was more cerebral and had more depth, I found Valmont to be much more entertaining. The former had a more cynical and darker tone, while the latter had a much lighter, humorous tone. If nothing else, it's interesting to see how 2 directors interpreted the same story.
@@QuirkyGirl10 Not at all
Reminds me of IMPROMPTU; another super flick.
Best version of the Dangerous Liaisons story, shame it flopped at the box office, but I like it much better than the Malkovitch film.
of course it flopped!!! It came out the same year as Dangerous Liaisons and can not hold a candle to The Masterpiece
Terrible, horrible adaptation of a great book. DangerousLiaisons by Stephen Frears is a much better adaptation. Milos Forman makes great movies but takes far too much liberties.
I guess that depends on if you read the book, which I haven't. I think both productions had their own merits. It was interesting to me to see how the story and characters were interpreted in both films.
Shut up, Dangerous Liaisons is like a stage play. Valmont is more cinematic.
Valmont s very different ! It has incredible subtleties. All the characters live a transition and change. The one who is on the verge of insanity is without a doubt Merteuil. She goes so far that it is impossible for her to change. What is strange in this movie is that all the despictable characters want to find the lost paradise of love and all the lovable characters loose the paradise of love and innocence. But there is no redemption for the most evil of them : Merteuil played by the incredibly seductive Annette Benning.
whatever 🙄
@@QuirkyGirl10 I've read it several times, so I can appreciate both adaptations for their tonally contrasting interpretations of the same story.
The fact that the book is written entirely in the form of letters from the characters to one another is genius because it tasks readers with questioning how much of the story we're being told by so many narrators is true, accurate and unbiased versus deceitful, manipulative or just plain gossip. And we can only assume what emotions they're honestly feeling.
Another thing that I think no film adaptation fully captures is just how insufferably narcissistic Merteuil and Valmont come across in writing. It would be impossible for a script to condense the way they talk to each other with so much condescension and the way they describe their own perceptions of themselves and their self-proclaimed accomplishments in the game of seduction. It really makes us have to wonder how much our two anti-heroes are living in objective reality as opposed to grandiose delusion.
For these reasons, the OG source material still reigns supreme.
the marquis was the most manipulative person ive seen on film
He and the marquise were a good pair in that!
💗
what is the name of the song that starts playing at 0:52?
tattttiii
I believe it's "Le Sorcier
" by François-André Danican Philidor. But I'm not a 100% sure.
I found some of the lyrics:
"Pity the fate of a fair young maiden
"Searching the meadows and woods in fear
"Useless for her to expend all her efforts
"Or to flee when a shepherd draws near
"If at night, as she turns to go home
"He who has watched her will then appear
"She must yield to my magical powers
"She cannot hope to keep her flower safe
"No matter how hard she try
"I'm a great wizard, a wizard am I
"I'm a great wizard, a wizard am l".
That music that starts at 0:52 is an epic orchestral version of it. It would be awesome if they used that music for that new "Hogwart's Legacy" game.
I never understood why did they choose an asian woman to play a 18th century french aristocrat!
Meg Tilly is a Canadian American. She is not Asian.
ourdrainageditchworld doghairsStorm her ancestry is half chinese.
@@ourdrainageditchworlddogha3260 Her mother is chinese
@@ourdrainageditchworlddogha3260
She is of Asian descent.
@@ourdrainageditchworlddogha3260 and she was the lucky first wife of Colin in real life!
plz youtube admin upload this movie..
Very eloquent love letter Valmont.
A pity you don't mean it.
A man like him would not know the meaning of the word.
After reading the plot it’s no different from Cruel Intentions only told in the 18th century of France the fact both films are adaptations of the French novel, “Les Liaisons dangereuses.”