Who Sank the Vasa?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 лют 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 520

  • @AngelVazquez-xh1dh
    @AngelVazquez-xh1dh 4 роки тому +456

    I went to that museum when I was 16yo and it was wonderful seeing the only "living" vessel from that time. Now I'm about to finish my Naval Architect degree.

    • @anders_jelkatron_Eriksson
      @anders_jelkatron_Eriksson 4 роки тому +5

      good on you

    • @oddballsok
      @oddballsok 4 роки тому +5

      I was in the museum in 1998..I cant remember being allowed INSIDE the vessel in the cargo hold..
      Or is this a copy room ?

    • @MarshmaloWarrior
      @MarshmaloWarrior 4 роки тому +17

      ​@@oddballsok That is a copy room, I was there last summer. There is probably a lot of things that are new since 1998 and I would very much recommend visiting again if possible!
      And no, they won't let anyone on the ship for obvious reasons :)

    • @Helperbot-2000
      @Helperbot-2000 4 роки тому +1

      good luck

    • @taketimeout2share
      @taketimeout2share 4 роки тому +8

      @@Helperbot-2000 What, in case it sinks again? ( Joke)

  • @gavinyeomans
    @gavinyeomans 4 роки тому +282

    god bless tom scott for platforming such incredible creators such as yourself. great work on this!

  • @chinashorts1491
    @chinashorts1491 6 років тому +223

    That's almost exactly the kind of thing you'd find on a well funded TV show. I hope you guys get lots of funding and your own show, you've definitely earned it. Some executives need to see this.

    • @xraceboyex
      @xraceboyex 2 роки тому +1

      I hope he gets funding in any and all ways, but forget the execs. This guy needs freedom. This was great documentation - executives would ruin his style and message

  • @schlepper7125
    @schlepper7125 6 років тому +1289

    That’s got to be the worst pirate I’ve ever seen

  • @Anonymous-zu7dh
    @Anonymous-zu7dh 4 роки тому +101

    As a Swede that have been to the museum and heard other things from the ship due to it being a very historical thing. This explanation was really well done.

    • @artsson8221
      @artsson8221 3 роки тому +1

      Yeah i know it was something like the germans built the left side and the dutch did the right but the thing was that they used different measurements which caused the sinking.

    • @emptycinema
      @emptycinema 3 роки тому

      I'm so sad that I wasn't there when I visited Sweden

    • @gary7vn
      @gary7vn 2 роки тому +1

      @@somedrytoast2307 When an anon poster makes an unsubstantiated, unsourced, claim online, the rational thing is to ignore it as "noise". Failing that, check his claim. I did, he's full of it. Liar or stupid or just misinformed, it doesn't matter, his claim is nonsensical bullshit.

  • @ciphergalm1174
    @ciphergalm1174 5 років тому +754

    much better than history channel...they would've said aliens sank it 👽

    • @nicpus6891
      @nicpus6891 4 роки тому +47

      If we look at this plank here from the Vasa ship. You can just barely see the face of an alien. Does this mean Vasa was sunk by ancient aliens from outer space? Ancient Astronaut Theorists say Yes. xd

    • @Diego-zz1df
      @Diego-zz1df 4 роки тому +5

      It was made with hyperresistant alien wood planks.

    • @abohassan238
      @abohassan238 4 роки тому +10

      But how do you know it wasnt Aliens? After all, the Vasa had refrences to ancient Egypt carved on her and as we all know, Aliens built the Pyramids of Egypt

    • @Diego-zz1df
      @Diego-zz1df 4 роки тому +5

      @@abohassan238I asked them and the aliens said it wasn't them because they had movie night and they weren't gonna miss it to play with some wooden ship.

    • @justingitsme3093
      @justingitsme3093 4 роки тому +1

      Ancient astronaut theorists

  • @stianberg5645
    @stianberg5645 4 роки тому +311

    2:00 My gods it is a good thing you wore safety glasses for that experiment, you absolute madlad!
    Jk. I know, it is a general rule. Well made documentary! good use of the museum resources too

    • @AtomicFrontier
      @AtomicFrontier  4 роки тому +54

      Haha, thanks! We'd been annoying the lab supervisor with the Mars videos (something about too many explosions and misuse of hydrogen gas) so decided to play it extra safe for this one!

    • @MrJeffcoley1
      @MrJeffcoley1 3 роки тому +7

      The Material Safety Data Sheet for water advises if you get it in your eyes, flush with water. Not even joking.

    • @peterfireflylund
      @peterfireflylund 2 роки тому +2

      @@MrJeffcoley1 you never know how much dihydrogenmonoxide there is in the water…

  • @snigwithasword1284
    @snigwithasword1284 4 роки тому +93

    2:00 Missed opportunity: "If we assume a perfectly cylindrical Vasa..."

  • @remcovanwoerkom2016
    @remcovanwoerkom2016 6 років тому +72

    Nice production quality and very informative!

  • @kgiese17
    @kgiese17 5 років тому +42

    Good content. Comfortable length, good production, well researched and likeable presenter. Thank you and keep it up!

  • @tsartodd
    @tsartodd 4 роки тому +68

    i remember seeing this in a museum in Stockholm. it was so obvious why it sank, it was so mad top heavy. why did they think that this thing was seaworthy?!?

    • @Schmorgus
      @Schmorgus 4 роки тому +13

      There's been loads of thoughts _(proof really)_ that the Vasa family suffered from genetic insanity.
      People were most likely to afraid to warn the king, because any hate on his ideas = off with their heads :P

    • @nuralibolataev4474
      @nuralibolataev4474 4 роки тому +17

      @@Schmorgus Well, I wouldn't say that they didn't wanna tell him that because they were scared because they thought that he was mad. Gustav the II Adulf was beloved by the swedes (and still is). From what I read he seemed to be a perfectly functioning person (who was a brilliant general as well), I think that they just didn't wanna tell the king that the ship that he ordered and invested a sh*t load of money on not to work so they just went along hoping that somebody else would take the blame until it became soo big that nobody could be blamed. Not even Gustav because all he basically sed was "hey can you build me a giant ship, I'll give you as much money as you need"

    • @Schmorgus
      @Schmorgus 4 роки тому +11

      @@nuralibolataev4474 Well. He increased his own power, and the nobility's. He increased taxes for personal wealth, and common people had a rough time during his reign. The ship didn't even pass the basic stability-test, but the king payed the correct people to push the launch to show off the ship against Poland. That shows that even if he himself was shown as a good king according to some history, looking behind him, he used his nobility, most likely to threaten and kill in order to get what he wanted. He even stated that he was "equal to god". IMO he knew how to use political power in order to look good while silencing those who opposed him, but behind the curtains, he was as insane as his fathers before him. I'm swedish, and he might be loved by the far right due to his expanding wars. But he's not loved as a king of the common people :P

    • @nuralibolataev4474
      @nuralibolataev4474 4 роки тому +5

      ​@@Schmorgus Well, he kinda needed to increase his own power to stabilize the political situation in Sweden because he entered the 30yers war on the protestant side in a time when the protestants were getting their ass handed to them so he couldn't afford any political strife back home when he was campaigning in Germany. And increasing taxes was easily justifiable because you know war isn't cheap, he needed the money to pay upkeep for his troops and their supplies and to garner political support in mainland Europe. The point of increasing his own wealth is kinda weird because he was out campaigning pretty much all the money from the taxes went into the war, and sure he's campaigning conditions ware much much much better than the average soldier, but that doesn't change the fact that the money he used pretty much all went into the war effort one-way or another. The thing with the Vassa put yourself in his shoes for a moment you are in a brutal conflict with a much larger enemy and you need to improve your military including your navy therefor you decide to create the greatest warship on the face of the earth, so you ask your best experts and they say that they can do it so you give them all the money they need but you need the ship asap so you give them a deadline with they said that they can handle. you don't know how a ship work but all the expert say that it will work so you trust them because they know what they are talking about. It's not your fault that everything went down the shitter now, is it?

    • @Schmorgus
      @Schmorgus 4 роки тому +6

      @@nuralibolataev4474 Well, the 30 year war wasn't justified, other than the kings beliefs. People didn't want the war :P And the ship was built to "impress" Poland. Wich at the time wasn't important due to other conflicts.

  • @trex_1016
    @trex_1016 4 роки тому +14

    Woah I just realised how much subs you have and you definitely deserve more. Such high quality for such little subs and extremely informative.

    • @AtomicFrontier
      @AtomicFrontier  4 роки тому +2

      Thanks Trex! Ever new sub helps, especially when trying to get into weird places arround the world.

  • @Mctrippzy
    @Mctrippzy 5 років тому +44

    I went to see it in 2001 when I was 11, it’s massive and brilliantly crafted. Shame but at least it lasted all this time. A must go if you ever visit Stockholm.

    • @FullOilBarrel
      @FullOilBarrel 4 роки тому

      it couldnt even resist a weak breeze, id say its a terrible construction

    • @proxythe1337
      @proxythe1337 4 роки тому +9

      @@FullOilBarrel Good construction, bad design, haha!

    • @EliF-ge5bu
      @EliF-ge5bu 3 роки тому

      @@proxythe1337 good construction? The frigid waters preserved it until it can be raised again, I wouldn’t call it good construction.

    • @poppymoon777
      @poppymoon777 Рік тому

      I just saw it the other day and pictures and UA-cam videos don’t do it justice!

  • @gummykangaroo
    @gummykangaroo 6 років тому +16

    Thank you for this video! It is very informative and very qualitative! I'm looking forward to watch more content created by you!

  • @ianmacfarlane1241
    @ianmacfarlane1241 4 роки тому +7

    Found your channel following the video you did on Australian bushfire satellites for Tom Scott.
    Excellent work.

  • @turinmormegil7715
    @turinmormegil7715 4 роки тому +20

    Three or two years ago, I bought a illustration of Vasa and put it into a frame and hanged it on the wall beside of my bed. I knew nothing about famous vessels of this period, but I wanted one that seemed very elegant and that gave that old antique vieb to my room. Out of the ones the artist showed me, I found Vasa to be the most beatiful and exquisite, but he only told me it sank- which, to be fair, most famous and old ships eventually also did. When I got home I searched it's history to see if I picked, by chance and ramdomly, a famous ship that I was unaware of, and, since then, when I look at it, I always remember that fated failed maiden voyage. A monument fo failure, indeed! And a strong reminder against hastened enterprises and undertakings , whichever they might be.

    • @DiscGoStu
      @DiscGoStu 6 місяців тому +1

      That’s an awesome story! You should head over to Stockholm and see it in person, it’s really unbelievable even though you known it’s real 🇸🇪

    • @turinmormegil7715
      @turinmormegil7715 6 місяців тому

      @@DiscGoStu thanks. I've never traveled abroad, at least yet, but I do confess I'd be really curious about the real ship indeed. Specially one so well preserved and turned into museum

  • @cruxgaming622
    @cruxgaming622 5 місяців тому +1

    This video has so much quality and effort put into it

  • @markmarsh27
    @markmarsh27 4 роки тому +6

    Totally amazing that 400 years underwater have barely affected this beautiful ship. ... SUBSCRIBED!

    • @AtomicFrontier
      @AtomicFrontier  4 роки тому +6

      Yes, its truly an awe inspiring experience to see her in (almost) the same condition she launched in. Coincidentally, congratulations on being subscriber number 3000!

    • @markmarsh27
      @markmarsh27 4 роки тому +1

      ​@@AtomicFrontier Keep producing videos like THIS and you'll be congratulating Subscriber number 3 MILLION soon enough! .... cheers.

  • @KyleOfCanada
    @KyleOfCanada 4 роки тому +5

    I had just heard about the Vasa recently. This is an excellent explanation of what happened and why; informative but to-the-point. Your presentation was very professional and reminded me of the science shows I would watch as a kid. All the best.

    • @jari2018
      @jari2018 4 роки тому

      they found one of her sister ships sunk in the archipelago recenty -now they got 2 of 3

    • @KyleOfCanada
      @KyleOfCanada 4 роки тому

      @@jari2018 That's neat! I didn't know she had sister ships.

    • @jari2018
      @jari2018 4 роки тому

      @@KyleOfCanada ua-cam.com/video/P7axBG73HQE/v-deo.html . this is the video

    • @KyleOfCanada
      @KyleOfCanada 4 роки тому

      @@jari2018 Thanks for the link. All the best.

  • @josephbennett4236
    @josephbennett4236 5 років тому +7

    Nice job, James! Very impressed with what you're doing.

  • @aaronlewis848
    @aaronlewis848 4 роки тому +7

    Yup, that’s a career in presenting/narrating for sure. I really enjoyed that.

    • @AtomicFrontier
      @AtomicFrontier  4 роки тому +4

      Thanks Aaron! Really means a lot.. especially during exam season! Nice backup if fluid mechanics doesn't go too well :p

  • @patrik5123
    @patrik5123 4 роки тому +7

    As a Swede, I have visited Vasamuseet several times. I learned more from this

    • @YannickDLproductions
      @YannickDLproductions 4 роки тому +1

      Well, I think it's a good museum. Everything is explained and even much more (the recovery and preservation). Although you need to read all information boards to get the full story and information.

  • @johnsamu
    @johnsamu 4 роки тому +28

    The Swedish king saved a lot of lives by sinking his own ship before the enemy could do so 😉😁
    The Swedish justice system was surprisingly good at that time by NOT blaming the lowest guy in the picking order.

    • @talktoomemoose7686
      @talktoomemoose7686 2 роки тому

      It was good timing.
      A good king, good generals, high public morale, good ministers, all at the same time( rare)

  • @ottoartamo353
    @ottoartamo353 4 роки тому +3

    Great video, honestly i learned more by watching this, than 2 months of online physics classes.

  • @KGJT
    @KGJT 4 роки тому +11

    we have a local legend where i live that the engineer responsible for the blueprints fled up here to get away from the inquiries regarding why the ship sank

  • @davidekdal7190
    @davidekdal7190 4 роки тому +3

    This ship was my obsession for a large part of my childhood. I will never loose the fascination for these kinds of ships.

  • @1eyegraff
    @1eyegraff 5 років тому +5

    I really enjoyed this video! keep up the good work!

  • @johnben93
    @johnben93 4 роки тому +2

    I just found your channel, and the quality of production seems higher than many productions that I've seen on TV. I hope some network or executive sees your productions and invests. I hope you make it big. Cheers! :)
    P.S. Keep up the amazing work! :D

  • @jhenukumar
    @jhenukumar 5 років тому +7

    Amazing video ..... why do you have very few subscribers ??? ... you really deseve more

  • @mundall1271
    @mundall1271 7 місяців тому

    Excellent production and presentation thank you!

  • @louiserose2609
    @louiserose2609 3 роки тому +1

    Thank you for this! I love history along with science!!!!

  • @mikeyoung9810
    @mikeyoung9810 4 роки тому +2

    I expected it to be a simple thing ie the gun ports, but it was alot more complicated than that. (sort of like life can be in many things). Great video. I'm glad your video showed up in my recommended today.

  • @SPEEDKILLAR
    @SPEEDKILLAR 6 років тому +9

    More of these, thanks.

  • @landedinparainen
    @landedinparainen 3 роки тому

    This is informative and explained in a way that most of us can understand. Great!

  • @maikel4914
    @maikel4914 4 роки тому

    Man you nailed this small documentary.

  • @Koel_Hellion
    @Koel_Hellion 4 роки тому +2

    Oh damn this is some pretty high quality content man! Keep up the good work! U definitely earned a sub from me :D

  • @RadioactiveSaddam
    @RadioactiveSaddam 3 роки тому

    Great video! Greetings from Sweden.

  • @melkerferdfelt4304
    @melkerferdfelt4304 4 роки тому +2

    Love your work!

  • @JH-lo9ut
    @JH-lo9ut 3 роки тому +5

    It wasn't the weight of the guns really, but the weight of all the timbers that made up the second gun deck. It was over- dimensioned and too tall.
    The weight of the guns is only about 5% of Vasa's displacement weight, wich is well within the "safe" margin for a warship of this size.
    Vasa was built too tall, wich is a style that carried over from earlier types of ships, where the taller ship had the tactical advantage in a boarding situation.
    Because Vasa was going to carry so many guns, they built the ship super sturdy with over-dimensioned timbers. It was this added weight of all the extra wood that made the ship so top-heavy.
    The physics involved in ship stability is way more complicated than described in this video.
    This has to do with the fact that a ship is a complex three-dimensional shape that gradually shanges it's shape (and therefore it's boyancy) relative to the water, as it tilts to the side.
    The understanding of these mechanisms weren't very developed att the time Vasa was built.
    What really makes Vasa unique wasn't that she tipped over and sank, lots of ships did this, but the fact she sank in a place uniquely suited to preserve a large wooden structure.

    • @lutzderlurch7877
      @lutzderlurch7877 Рік тому

      Yeah, Vasa seems like many many different things went wrong, each of which would have been detrimental, but they all came together to make one giant mess.

    • @trevorn9381
      @trevorn9381 7 місяців тому

      King Henry VIII's warship Mary Rose suffered a similar fate after he had her substantially rebuilt and fitted with heavy bronze cannons that she was never designed to carry.

  • @jusdafide
    @jusdafide Рік тому

    This was excellently presented 👏🏻

  • @TheAwfulInternet
    @TheAwfulInternet 6 років тому +1

    Subscriber 704, checking in. Excellent content, I cant wait to see what you produce next.

  • @peterwallace9764
    @peterwallace9764 3 роки тому

    An unbelievable part of History. Fantastic.

  • @prasadhapuarachchi7337
    @prasadhapuarachchi7337 4 роки тому +1

    Great explanation bro 👍

  • @caveman13801
    @caveman13801 4 роки тому

    How does this channel have only 3000 subscribers? The quality is amazing

    • @AtomicFrontier
      @AtomicFrontier  4 роки тому

      Thanks for the support! Just about to finish up on another filming expedition so lots more coming soon! Make sure to check out the "best of" playlist while you wait :D

  • @Mohammed8778
    @Mohammed8778 4 роки тому +3

    Really well done video. the ending is improvable tho lol

  • @c.d.3485
    @c.d.3485 4 роки тому +1

    I have a small cast model of the Vasa. About 30cm long.
    It was used by my grandfather's company on trade show stands to illustrate how their companies pumps, pumped the water out just after the Vasa was brought back to the surface and kept afloat when the ship was recovered.
    It was good to see some history relating to it
    Cheers.

  • @HansenSWE
    @HansenSWE 4 роки тому

    An outstanding presentation, young man.

  • @Dj3ndo
    @Dj3ndo 4 роки тому +1

    Good content. Subbed!

  • @Fish_Feet
    @Fish_Feet 3 роки тому +1

    Dang I when I clicked on this video I did. It expect it to be this high quality!

  • @whssy
    @whssy 5 років тому

    Great video. Looks like you did all the prep before visiting Stockholm and had the script ready.

    • @AtomicFrontier
      @AtomicFrontier  5 років тому +1

      Thanks! Yes, I really like to script the majority of the video beforehand and then make adjustments if needed. Makes it less stressful when filming, and ensures that I won't miss anything.

  • @markusz4447
    @markusz4447 4 роки тому

    Really well made. Thank you!

  • @pindsvin4492
    @pindsvin4492 4 роки тому

    this is a pretty good vid mate nice work

  • @swedishbloke
    @swedishbloke 3 роки тому +2

    I’ve seen her atleast 10 times. I’m always impressed by her. Wish that the gun ports where placed higher up though...

  • @TheTomsho
    @TheTomsho 5 років тому +1

    Thanks for the video:)

  • @WardenWolf
    @WardenWolf 4 роки тому +5

    Who sank the Vasa? Design by committee sank the Vasa. They took a good original design and kept messing with it and expanding it until it was unstable.

  • @kert-resz
    @kert-resz 3 роки тому

    De jó kis történet, köszönöm.

  • @Sailor376also
    @Sailor376also 4 роки тому

    Excellently explained.

  • @samclay2613
    @samclay2613 4 роки тому +1

    ive been to this museum! its amazing

  • @J.A.Hansen
    @J.A.Hansen 4 роки тому +1

    Exellent Video👌

  • @peterwortmann
    @peterwortmann 4 роки тому

    avesome topic, very well explained. thank you

  • @r3ttgaming177
    @r3ttgaming177 4 роки тому +1

    I have a bit to add. Yes you are 100% correct (if my memory serves me correctly) that the boat was too narrow after some modifications had been made. But ONLY this fact would probably not have been enough to tollaly doom the ship. You missed one thing, the seconed gun deck. (again, if my memory serves me correctly) The seconed gun deck was added to the ship in the middle of production (on demand of the Swedish king) and the ship designers knew all along (now as well with the very very narrow keel) that the ship would be very unstable but the ship designers also knew it would be suicide to dissmiss the kings order as impossible.
    So one thing led to another and now the ship sailed with a way too narrow keel (I belive that's what it's called. The narrow keel was also on order of the Swedish king btw) and one more gun deck, it now sank like a rock. The ship was NOT doomed from the start, but this was not the same ship they had from the start. And that's the reason why it sank in the end. In a way the king(s) was the only person who really sank the ship (in my opinion).
    Thanks for reading the comment, love ya videos!

  • @neilbain8736
    @neilbain8736 4 роки тому +2

    There'll probably be a few comments about the Mary Rose, which did exactly the same thing in Henry VIII's time in 1545 in the Solent.
    maryrose.org/blog/historical/museum-blogger/the-first-battle-of-the-mary-rose/
    She capsized while fighting the French as she was turning between firing broadsides. Although older, dating from 1510, she had also been rebuilt, making her unstable which was to be her undoing for just the same reasons. A lot less of her survives, but when she was raised, it gave an amazing opportunity for study. Robert Hardy who played Cornelius Fudge in the HP movies, but at the time was famous for playing Seigfried Farnon in All Creatures Great And Small, was also a world expert on longbows and was called up for input into boxes of longbows found amongst her armaments.

  • @juliantotriwijaya9208
    @juliantotriwijaya9208 4 роки тому +40

    "who sank the vasa?"
    Me: gravity!

  • @Aengus42
    @Aengus42 2 роки тому

    I've always had a soft spot for the Vasa. I remember a library book from my childhood, probably in 1970 or so, about the great ship. I have an image in my head of a tearful Vasa on the seafloor. Ever since I've wanted to go see her.

  • @jocax188723
    @jocax188723 4 роки тому +3

    This is probably an early example of Groupthink at work again, I think.
    Nobody was brave enough to tell the King his ship specs were stupid, and so the ship sank.

  • @sergarlantyrell7847
    @sergarlantyrell7847 4 роки тому +1

    He did make it seem like if the centre of gravity was above the centre of buoyancy then the ship was unstable and likely to capsize.
    Most ships are designed with a centre of gravity above the centre of buoyancy.
    Just the hull of a ship should be designed so that the centre of buoyancy moves outwards faster than the centre of gravity so the resultant moment rights the ship.

  • @AndreasVictorsson
    @AndreasVictorsson 3 роки тому +11

    Even though it was a great embarrassment and unfortunate disaster, it's fortunate that we in modern times get to experience a preserved real authentic warship from 1628. If the ship would've seen actual warfare it most likely would've ended up damaged and scuttled eventually.
    It's a win and a loss no matter how I look at it.

  • @hektorm5762
    @hektorm5762 3 роки тому +1

    In Sweden the tale often goes that the king demanded a ship with more and more cannons which is what sank it. We infer from it both to question what we are told to do and the concept of ”Lagom” or in moderation/ just enough.

  • @GefreitervonAdler
    @GefreitervonAdler 6 років тому +12

    Gustav II Adolf wanted the ship to join in protecting his invasion fleet of Ducal Prussia (East Prussia) as the Courlanders (as the Prussians a Polish vassal at the time) had a powerful navy. Sweden's involvement in th 30 years' war started 1630, after the invasion of Prussia had ended in a favourable cease fire with the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth and its vassals.

  • @dkneuer
    @dkneuer 4 роки тому

    Just to narrow to handle the displacement. Liked your show very much!

  • @lauravanniekerk4719
    @lauravanniekerk4719 Рік тому

    Excellent stuff

  • @ob1983
    @ob1983 4 роки тому

    Great video 👍

    • @AtomicFrontier
      @AtomicFrontier  4 роки тому

      Thanks Ob! More boat-disaster videos coming soon

  • @malx1289
    @malx1289 2 роки тому

    I saw this it was so dang cool

  • @johnmar1622
    @johnmar1622 Рік тому

    Just got back visiting this versa on 2023. A priceless artwork, Because of Kings mistake, this made the Sweden as a famous tourist attractions.

  • @jek__
    @jek__ 2 роки тому

    My thought process when seeing the thumbnail was "sank the what? Eh, im not really up for an obscure history tidbit. Oh, atomic frontier? This will definitely be good"
    A boat sinking in port is such a strange event. Its weird how casually it seems to drift over, until it's fallen, and suddenly it's an emergency. This was a lot less tragic than the SS Eastland though

  • @obisvanainobis9950
    @obisvanainobis9950 4 роки тому +1

    Ive been in that muzeum about a year ago

  • @joejoemyo
    @joejoemyo 2 роки тому +1

    I've never seen a ship sink another quite as effectively as the Vasa sunk itself

  • @Ragnarok-svensson
    @Ragnarok-svensson 3 роки тому +2

    First Swede Screams: ”How did Vasa sink?”
    All other Swedes: Bottom Up! Skål!
    Everyone swallows their glass of Aquavit or Bäska droppar. 👌👌 🇸🇪 🇸🇪

  • @305havana
    @305havana 2 роки тому

    good video

  • @vectorbrony3473
    @vectorbrony3473 4 роки тому +13

    Yeah I could see that going well.
    Inquest - We have come to the conclusion that the ships design laid down by his Royal highness is the cause of the sinking of the Vasa. The ship was over loaded with decoration and cannon and put into an unsuitable vessel.
    King - Throw these lords into jail to stand trial for treason against the king!

  • @nilsostergrens1542
    @nilsostergrens1542 4 роки тому +3

    I think we all can agree that it would have been much greater to see how she did in War before sinking..
    Would’ve been nice to see how she dealt with other ”top tier” ships at the time:/

  • @Deddily
    @Deddily 4 роки тому

    Great documentary, but it seems the end is missing?

  • @quammelschroedinger780
    @quammelschroedinger780 4 роки тому

    I was in that museum and they tould us that they accused the ships architect for sinking it, who was dead by the time the ship was launched.

  • @noellundstrom7447
    @noellundstrom7447 4 роки тому

    I've been to this museum!

  • @tabcreedence6553
    @tabcreedence6553 3 роки тому

    cool design bro

  • @heyitssayjaytay7475
    @heyitssayjaytay7475 5 років тому

    Great video!

  • @MaskinJunior
    @MaskinJunior 4 роки тому +1

    As a result of the sinking, the King established a cabinet with the purpose of looking into military systems and how they work together as a system, in this case ship + cannons. That cabinet is today a governmental agency with the same mission. FMV, who assess all purchases of military and some civil defense equipment.

    • @AtomicFrontier
      @AtomicFrontier  4 роки тому

      Wow, thats really interesting, thanks for sharing!

    • @tomasgidlof9545
      @tomasgidlof9545 4 роки тому

      2021-02-14 , kl. 08 (UTC+1) Till Maskin junior. www.fmv.se
      / Gidlöf.se (Trasig server gör att min sida inte fungerar den närmaste veckan.)

    • @tomasgidlof9545
      @tomasgidlof9545 4 роки тому

      @@AtomicFrontier 2021-02-14 , kl. 08 (UTC+1) www.fmv.se / Gidlöf.se (Trasig server gör att min sida inte fungerar den närmaste veckan.)

    • @MaskinJunior
      @MaskinJunior 4 роки тому +1

      @@tomasgidlof9545 yes, but sadly the site doesn't tell people about the extensive history leading up to the creation of their organization.

  • @ernesttuno
    @ernesttuno 3 роки тому

    Visited the museum when I was in Stockholm! 2008.

  • @stormykeep9213
    @stormykeep9213 7 місяців тому

    Back in those days, these ships weren't just vessels of war, they were works of art!

  • @unownnnn
    @unownnnn 4 роки тому

    Good content

  • @andrewandrew583
    @andrewandrew583 4 роки тому +1

    Imagine being there seeing your country’s Navy’s flagship sail out of the bay in a magnificent gust but then she said into the water

  • @lakselv3768
    @lakselv3768 5 місяців тому

    6:30 - The king was to blame for the Vasa to sink. He was in a hurry to see it sail! He ignored every person who said the design was flawed.

  • @Nerdpainter
    @Nerdpainter 3 роки тому

    that sucks so bad. what a beautiful ship. but at least it wasn't blown to bits and we get to look at it now.

  • @Schougen-Studio
    @Schougen-Studio 4 роки тому

    I find it interesting that vasa sank on its first jurney, but her sister ship Äpplet was in active service for 30 year with just some small adjusments.

    • @AtomicFrontier
      @AtomicFrontier  4 роки тому

      Wow! Really a cautionary tale in not rushing things.

    • @lutzderlurch7877
      @lutzderlurch7877 Рік тому

      wasn't unheard of for ships of that time to show some wonkyness of some sort when launched, and got it ironed out to a deree later on. I also heard Vasa somewhat suffered from sailing towards a depot to take stores, meaning she had barely any of the heavy stores in her hold that might have mitigated some of her issues.
      Then again, Vasa seemed to have just pushed some limits fiurther than her sister and paid the price

  • @jaredmehrlich6683
    @jaredmehrlich6683 2 роки тому

    4:50 Here's the answer to they mystery. They used an existing under construction boat keel rather than a starting from scratch. This made the boat unstable.

  • @SalvadorAlcala-dr9yk
    @SalvadorAlcala-dr9yk 10 місяців тому

    I’m waiting for the hop on hop off bus right outside as I watch this

  • @NoOne-ef7yu
    @NoOne-ef7yu 5 місяців тому

    There is another way to stabilize a ship: To make the center of buoyancy move to the side, as the ship leans.
    This is how modern container ships, with their heavy cargo up top stay stable.

  • @The_Curious_Cat
    @The_Curious_Cat 3 роки тому

    If I'm not mistaken, when the Vasa was ordered, it was supposed to have only one deck of guns. But the king wanted to make a statement and wanted the Vasa to be the most powerfully armed vessel in the world, so he said to up-gun it adding another deck of guns. But the Vasa was already well underway in construction, so they just adapted. But the ship was too narrow and the center of mass end up too high and well... The rest is history indeed.

  • @thewr0ngchild
    @thewr0ngchild 3 роки тому +1

    The king sunk her because he decided to basically pile on a load of decoupage stuff, rather than focusing on her practicality as a warship. She was already carrying some weight with her guns, so the rest of her design should have incorporated that. There really is something to be said for 'no frills' design and engineering, only put in what you need, leave out what you don't.

  • @pixelkatten
    @pixelkatten 4 роки тому +5

    You went to Sweden to film on location but couldn't find anyone that could tell you how to pronounce skeppsgården?

    • @adorabasilwinterpock6035
      @adorabasilwinterpock6035 4 роки тому

      Jag tror det är näst intill omöjligt för en engelsktalande.
      (I think that’s pretty much impossible for an English speaker.)

    • @pixelkatten
      @pixelkatten 4 роки тому +1

      @@adorabasilwinterpock6035 Förvisso, men det går att komma närmare än "Skips garden"