Dare to Solve: Can You Beat the Radical Equation?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 чер 2024
  • Dare to Solve: Can You Beat the Radical Equation?
    Dive into the world of radical equations with our latest challenge! Do you have what it takes to conquer the complexities of these mathematical puzzles? Join us as we explore strategies and techniques for tackling radical equations head-on. Dare to solve along with us and see if you can emerge victorious!
    Topics Covered:
    1. Understanding the basics of radical equations with domain.
    2. Analyzing equation with suitable substitution.
    3. Step-by-step approach to solving the radical equation.
    4. Tips and tricks for handling tricky radicals like a pro.
    5. Algebraic identities and manipulations while solving equations.
    6. Synthetic division method and rational root theorem.
    Timestamps:
    0:00 Introduction
    0:53 Substitution
    3:05 Solving system of equations
    5:30 Solving quartic equation
    6:01 Rational root theorem
    9:05 Synthetic division method
    12:11 Solution
    12:24 Verification
    #mathchallenge #radicalequations #problemsolving #mathematics #challengeaccepted #education #stem #criticalthinking #algebra #math
    🎯 This video is perfect for students, math enthusiasts, or anyone seeking to sharpen their problem-solving skills and gain confidence in dealing with radical equations. 🎓📈
    🔔 Challenge yourself and see if you can solve the equation before we do! Hit the like button if you're up for the challenge and remember to subscribe for more exhilarating math content! 🛎️🔔
    Don't forget to like, comment, and subscribe to join our math-loving community. Let's get started on this exciting journey together! 🤝🌟
    Thanks for Watching!
    @infyGyan

КОМЕНТАРІ • 11

  • @user-kp2rd5qv8g
    @user-kp2rd5qv8g Місяць тому +4

    Let sqrt(x)=t and t is positive. The given equation then reads t^4-38t^2 -t - 1656 = 0. t=8 is a solution. [t^4-38t^2 -t - 1656]/(t-8) = t^3 + 8 t^2 + 26t + 207. t^3 + 8 t^2 + 26t + 207=0 has one real solution which is negative and therefore unacceptable. Thus, t=8 > x = 64.

    • @moeberry8226
      @moeberry8226 Місяць тому

      You haven’t shown that the cubic only has 1 real root even though I agree with you, it could be the case that all the roots are real. But because t cannot be negative regardless you got bailed out. If t could be negative then you would still have to show that the other two can be rejected because they are not real.

  • @tejpalsingh366
    @tejpalsingh366 Місяць тому +3

    Nearby perfect square is 2025= 45^2
    Diffrence is 8
    Add √x= 8 i.e x= 64
    64-45= 19

  • @golddddus
    @golddddus Місяць тому +1

    Synthetic division can be used to calculate function values. 1 0 -38 -1 -1656
    (6) 6 36 -12 -78
    6 6 -2 -13 -1734 By the way, 13:22 must be a^3+8a^2+26a+207=0.😎

  • @backgammonmaster
    @backgammonmaster Місяць тому +2

    Dear Sir How do you know there are two complex and one real solution @10:30 ? Thanks for your great lessons 🙂

    • @infyGyan
      @infyGyan  Місяць тому +1

      For the cubic equation whose coefficients are only positive numbers then we may get the solutions either all negative or complex but surely no positive root is there. That's why the cubic equation won't be accepted.
      Thanks

  • @moeberry8226
    @moeberry8226 Місяць тому

    The better argument is to state that there are two cases with the cubic equation, either this equation has 3 real roots which in this case would be all negative and can be rejected or you have 1 real root and 2 complex roots which can also be rejected since we are looking for reals and our restriction on x. Also I want to note that looking at sign changes doesn’t tell you that the solutions must be negative because we see repeated addition. Descartes Rule of sign talks about only negative or positive roots and doesn’t guarantee that they are positive or negative because you can have a function such that it doesn’t change sign at all for either positive or negative values and can yield complex solutions or you can get simply 0.

    • @infyGyan
      @infyGyan  Місяць тому

      In all possible arguments one point is common that we won't get a single positive real root, so we can easily reject cubic equations for real solutions.
      Thanks

    • @moeberry8226
      @moeberry8226 Місяць тому

      @@infyGyan that’s only because how you defined “a” to be sqrt(x) in general the cubic can have 3 negative real roots so it’s not good enough to say that the cubic has 1 negative and 2 complex roots.

  • @mohammedsaysrashid3587
    @mohammedsaysrashid3587 Місяць тому +1

    Finally➡️ x= 64 .....thank you