I just subscribed, thanks for this excellent and informative content! I had no idea what "degrees" were before watching this video, and I still feel a bit lost. Maybe you would consider making a video explaining it? I like your style a lot. You deserve more subs for sure. Have a great day.
@@carlscinema7086 Not really. One or two specific vertical line on the frame. Like this: m.facebook.com/groups/882160648493783/permalink/2000332696676567/ Sorry, I can't describe better 😅😅 But yeah, when I on iso 800 or 1000 with low lighted scenes it shows two direct vertical lines on the left 1/3 part and the right 1/3 part of frame. It is frustrating because for example you shoot a single top lighting setup with dark background it is visible. 😕
I would say I try to stick to 400 in most cases, if I need a little bit more DR in the highlights in a tricky contrasy situation I might go to 800. But if I can keep everything within the DR at 400, thats preferable.
Hi! Your videos are super educational. Im currently waiting for my BMPCC4K to arrive, and your channel really helps me understand its basics! :) One thing I try to understand though. Many people talks about the Dual Iso system. But I cant really understand, that it is an adjustable something? So is there a buttom or setup where I can set two ISO-s for my video, or this is something I can edit during post production like choosing between 400 to 800 iso in post? Thanks for your answer!
I’m so torn right now because I have either the opportunity to buy a used bmpcc or gh5. What’s your opinion on the gh5? If the bmpcc had ibis I’d be onboard immediately
Really depends on what you're shooting and your goals. I would say the GH5 is the winner for more video type work, run n gun etc, while the bmpcc might be better if you want to focus on cinematography. Btw do you mean the original bmpcc or the 4k?
Thats why I show both the log version and one that is converted to Rec709. You can see the log image and the dynamic range you got to work with aswell as an example of what it could look like after its been graded (what a viewer would see).
@@carlscinema7086 gotcha. I know that proper grading takes time and most people don't know how to do it, including myself. That's why I prefer other types of high dynamic range luts than Rec709
Thanks for always keeping your videos clean and not zooming in and out after every jump cut
Great work Carl, thank you!
Thanks :)
I just subscribed, thanks for this excellent and informative content! I had no idea what "degrees" were before watching this video, and I still feel a bit lost. Maybe you would consider making a video explaining it? I like your style a lot. You deserve more subs for sure. Have a great day.
Great job man
We always gotta add ISO 1000 because it has more highlight DR. In bright frames noise won’t be an issue.
I have a separate video on ISO and DR: ua-cam.com/video/m-Jbin8DOmM/v-deo.html
so hooked!
👍👍
Is the blackmagic original still a good buy in 2020?
Did you notice any straight vertical line on the two 1/3 side of the frame when you underexposed?
Do you mean lines in the noise?
@@carlscinema7086 Not really. One or two specific vertical line on the frame. Like this: m.facebook.com/groups/882160648493783/permalink/2000332696676567/
Sorry, I can't describe better 😅😅
But yeah, when I on iso 800 or 1000 with low lighted scenes it shows two direct vertical lines on the left 1/3 part and the right 1/3 part of frame. It is frustrating because for example you shoot a single top lighting setup with dark background it is visible. 😕
Great video
So for outside you would always shoot iso 800 to have the best highlight and inside iso 400 or 1250 if you don’t have enough light?
I would say I try to stick to 400 in most cases, if I need a little bit more DR in the highlights in a tricky contrasy situation I might go to 800. But if I can keep everything within the DR at 400, thats preferable.
Hi! Your videos are super educational. Im currently waiting for my BMPCC4K to arrive, and your channel really helps me understand its basics! :) One thing I try to understand though. Many people talks about the Dual Iso system. But I cant really understand, that it is an adjustable something? So is there a buttom or setup where I can set two ISO-s for my video, or this is something I can edit during post production like choosing between 400 to 800 iso in post? Thanks for your answer!
What lut do you use for your main video, if any?
Hey Carl, I wanted to ask if I have a camera with no log/raw and only rec709 would this be the best way to test my cameras DR?
I’m so torn right now because I have either the opportunity to buy a used bmpcc or gh5. What’s your opinion on the gh5? If the bmpcc had ibis I’d be onboard immediately
Really depends on what you're shooting and your goals. I would say the GH5 is the winner for more video type work, run n gun etc, while the bmpcc might be better if you want to focus on cinematography. Btw do you mean the original bmpcc or the 4k?
@@carlscinema7086 either 4 or 6k
Particularly the 4k
The only thing I would've done differently is not have used a lut like Rec709, since it reduces dynamic range of your raw footage
Thats why I show both the log version and one that is converted to Rec709. You can see the log image and the dynamic range you got to work with aswell as an example of what it could look like after its been graded (what a viewer would see).
@@carlscinema7086 gotcha. I know that proper grading takes time and most people don't know how to do it, including myself. That's why I prefer other types of high dynamic range luts than Rec709