YOU WON'T SEE STEVEN SPIELBERG OR ANY DIRECTOR MAKING A MOVIE ABOUT HOW TERRIBLE THE WAR WAS ON THE EASTERN FRONT, HOLLYWOOD ALWAYS LEAVES THAT OUT 😮😮😮
There is this book "Fighting Power" by van Creveld. He anslyzed that it took 10 times more firepower to even out German fighting power. German army had advanced battle tactics, higher morale and better fighting skills. The movie doesnt reflect that. Assuming a situation as shown German squads tanks and pak against only US Infantry squads ... had ended very badly for the US troops. Not my opinion, its an analysis for Pentagon
@@underground651 I dunno what your definition of a pyrrhic victory is, but losing a handful of paratroopers to defend a strategic asset, whilst simultaneously knocking out several heavy tanks, SPGs, anti-aircraft guns and dozens of enemy troops aint it chief
Didn't the movie end when a rag tag fugue "group" of germechanized armour was ultimately halted by scene stealing rubble warfare tactics and an archangelic Mussssstang p51..?
D-Day June 6th 150k troops + 7.5k airplanes. June 12th 330k troops + 54k vehicles. June 30th 1 million troops, 150k vehicles. Thats the numbers of the allied superiority in France. T 1944. Never was there any doubt of winning the war at this point. But the movie showing a rookie infantry squad resisting battle hardened German troops is nonesense. It took the allies until Mid July to take Caen. it was planned to take Caen on day 1. I took them 14 days more to unite troops at Avranches.
I'm from Germany, but even for me it's hard to understand what he says. The first part sounds like "Nehmt das große Gebäude" = "Take the big building". I'm sorry, but I can not understand the second part.
Heroic men, even if this movie greatly underrepresents that. Greetings from Serbia.
YOU WON'T SEE STEVEN SPIELBERG OR ANY DIRECTOR MAKING A MOVIE ABOUT HOW TERRIBLE THE WAR WAS ON THE EASTERN FRONT, HOLLYWOOD ALWAYS LEAVES THAT OUT 😮😮😮
There are a bunch of movies about the eastern front you tard, Stalingrad (1993) is one of my favourite movies
He only depicts the Western front and the Holocaust. That's all he's good for
errr...what was Enemy at the Gates about?
Have any Russian directors made a film about the activities in WWII prior to the Nazi attach on the USSR?
The best film
Road to Valor - Google Play
Waffen SS veterans from the Eastern Front
Lo malo de esta película fue que allan puesto aún soldado bien cobarde que fue apum porque todo lo demás fue excelente
There is this book "Fighting Power" by van Creveld. He anslyzed that it took 10 times more firepower to even out German fighting power. German army had advanced battle tactics, higher morale and better fighting skills. The movie doesnt reflect that. Assuming a situation as shown German squads tanks and pak against only US Infantry squads ... had ended very badly for the US troops. Not my opinion, its an analysis for Pentagon
Obviusly only infantry gonna be defeated against tanks and pak, here had been shown, but Air Force gives a pyrrhic victory
@@underground651 I dunno what your definition of a pyrrhic victory is, but losing a handful of paratroopers to defend a strategic asset, whilst simultaneously knocking out several heavy tanks, SPGs, anti-aircraft guns and dozens of enemy troops aint it chief
Didn't the movie end when a rag tag fugue "group" of germechanized armour was ultimately halted by scene stealing rubble warfare tactics and an archangelic Mussssstang p51..?
D-Day June 6th 150k troops + 7.5k airplanes. June 12th 330k troops + 54k vehicles. June 30th 1 million troops, 150k vehicles. Thats the numbers of the allied superiority in France. T 1944. Never was there any doubt of winning the war at this point. But the movie showing a rookie infantry squad resisting battle hardened German troops is nonesense. It took the allies until Mid July to take Caen. it was planned to take Caen on day 1. I took them 14 days more to unite troops at Avranches.
Hollywood needs its stories. Real history or facts are not relevant.
any germans here know what the german officer said in 3:35?
I'm from Germany, but even for me it's hard to understand what he says. The first part sounds like "Nehmt das große Gebäude" = "Take the big building".
I'm sorry, but I can not understand the second part.
"not the big building. secure flank, move"
"Are we the baddies, Hans?"
@ 🤣
There is zero chance an old stone bridge like that could take the weight of a German tank
T con an mau buoi
Fake...the Tigers in Normandy were kept to be directed at the British/Canadian forces. The Americans faced recycled French tanks from 1940.
Don't be a tool would ya