Wolfram Mathematica vs Matlab: Why they switched from Matlab to Wolfram Mathematica

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 31 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ •

  • @neoforce0
    @neoforce0 3 місяці тому

    Mathematica is good for complicated calculations too not just simple ones. yup, its good for general purposes. Mathematica can do unusual geometries and PDE's too. Wolfram has a system Modeler that is available that expands Mathematica capabilities.

  • @МихаилФедосеев-ь7с

    Спасибо, Тигран! Помог сделать выбор.

  • @vtrandal
    @vtrandal Рік тому

    What's the point?

  • @annakquinn7084
    @annakquinn7084 2 роки тому +6

    Answer: Python

    • @youtubehandlesareridiculous
      @youtubehandlesareridiculous 2 роки тому +8

      But there's ML and data sets built right into Mathematica which helps with numerical stuff and you don't need multiple libraries like numpy, scipy, and pandas. Also symbolics built in. The Wolfram language incorporates data sets like GIS, planetary data, and climate info in one nice bundle without APIs. I agree python is great for most purposes (I use it mainly), but Mathematica and the Wolfram Language can do a lot too that it doesn't get enough credit for.

    • @annakquinn7084
      @annakquinn7084 2 роки тому +1

      @@youtubehandlesareridiculous everything is reachable with some pip install x for free and constantly updated. WM is nice, but the language is a mess.

    • @jaimeduncan6167
      @jaimeduncan6167 2 роки тому +1

      @@annakquinn7084 I am sukriced how much SymPy has progress for you to have such an opinion. Could you clarify the area you are woking on? Thanks.

    • @annakquinn7084
      @annakquinn7084 2 роки тому +4

      @@jaimeduncan6167 continnum mechanics, particle physics. Most of the time I do and implement numerical computations for solid and fluid mechanics. Wolfram is nice for symbolic but the Language is not that procedural. WM graphics are amazing, I like that from WM.

    • @jaimeduncan6167
      @jaimeduncan6167 2 роки тому

      @@annakquinn7084 Thanks for answering.