As a brazilian I'm proud of her, but I think it's fair to leave her with this tenths as "room for improvement", because she (possibly only she) can someday make it even better
There is also leg separation in the pre-flight phase, which is just a .1 deduction. Also she piked down just a little bit and maybe chest down. I don’t believe there is deduction on how far you are from the center of the line. Just as long as you don’t go out of bounce. But wow I’m just knit picking. Simone’s double pike and Andrades Cheng could legitimately be the highest execution score in the open ended code
I'm Brazilian and I saw the interview she gave righ after this competition, she said that she could feel her body a bit piked during that vault. So I think that was probably the deduction she had.
The perfect 10 needs to be based on the state of the art, the best that is being performed.....this is the BEST Cheng vault performed to date, so it's a 10
You're right. An Onodi is specifically a back handspring with half-twist to a front walkover on beam, not just any back handspring with a half-twist on any event. The entry is a round-off half on or Yurchenko 1/2.
@@darrintumbles4557half on. The entry is literally called Yurchenko half on in the code, let's stick to that, it's as bad as calling it Arabian entry just because of the half turn.
As a Brazilian, I think the judges could have given Rebeca Andrade a perfect 10 for her execution. The athletes need to be rewarded for the great effort they take to dedicate themselves to artistic gymnastics.
Effort isn’t worth a gold medal, it’s the other way around. If that were the case then everyone competing would just get random bonuses just for participating
@@hazelnutspred3348 There is no random bonus. The question here is a score of 10 for an impeccable exercise. If you think that Rebeca and other athletes, who throughout the history of gymnastics made their presentations and NONE deserved a 10, it means that you have the same archaic view that the jury has. It is humanly impossible to do all the movements perfectly. Athletes who perform impeccably deserve a 10.
Excelente video, ela levou ouro hoje e nos brasileros estamos muitos felizes, seria legal voce fazer uma avaliação dessa olimpiada dos pulos das competidoras, eu assistiria, obrigado !
Até aonde eu sei, em uma competição internacional essa foi a maior nota de execução depois que mudou a forma de avaliação, só a rebeca e outra ginasta( que tinha outro salto) conseguiram essa nota de execução.
She didn’t deserve a perfect 10 because it wasn’t perfect. Beautiful and one of the best ever competed, but not perfect. Deductions: preflight leg separation, landing off center, pike down on landing. ETA: someone else said chest down on landing, which I agree with.
Question: do you have to land perfectly on the center white line with the line between your feet in order to have no deductions? I thought landing anywhere between the two side lines was enough.
@@ParoloAndrenope! Commenter is wrong, you only get deducted if a foot or both feet are outside the lines, I also disagree with the pike down statement. No one can land perfectly straight, it’s not even safe to land like that.
As a brazilian I'm proud of her, but I think it's fair to leave her with this tenths as "room for improvement", because she (possibly only she) can someday make it even better
But how can this be better?
@@gabrielramiro2220if she lands in the center she could get 10.0 or closer to that
@@gabrielramiro2220 much less piking down.
There is also leg separation in the pre-flight phase, which is just a .1 deduction. Also she piked down just a little bit and maybe chest down. I don’t believe there is deduction on how far you are from the center of the line. Just as long as you don’t go out of bounce.
But wow I’m just knit picking. Simone’s double pike and Andrades Cheng could legitimately be the highest execution score in the open ended code
@@johanarteaga7622 there’s a deduction for being off center, even if you are in bounds
She's amazing!!!!
I want to see Cheng Fei react to this
I'm Brazilian and I saw the interview she gave righ after this competition, she said that she could feel her body a bit piked during that vault. So I think that was probably the deduction she had.
O salto de Rebeca ninguém nunca majs vai repetir.
So ela mesmo pra aperfeiçoar o que ja esta perfeito.
Eu nunca vi um salto tao bonito e lindo assim
The perfect 10 needs to be based on the state of the art, the best that is being performed.....this is the BEST Cheng vault performed to date, so it's a 10
Childish, moronic logic
@@keller109aren’t you a ray of sunshine
Rebeca once said in a interview that, after her last injury, she doesen't do blind landings anymore
But she did though, at the olympic games
Absolutely Amazing! Andrade 🏅❤
quality content right here
Rebeca é a Rainha da ginastica no Brasil.
Rebeca é um fenômeno, nossa rainha na ginástica.
Rebecca Chang best ever done ever ever
Not a ten because of a little liked on landing. Best ever done ever
Piked. Auto correct. Uggg
Impressionante Rebeca Andrade!!
Rebeca 👸🏾
❤❤❤
Little off center and piked landing, preflight open legs. Vaults/skills that hard get deduction bc they are so hard.
I’ve never heard of a half on referred to as an onodi, I was under the impression the onodi was specifically for a back takeoff to front walkover
You're right. An Onodi is specifically a back handspring with half-twist to a front walkover on beam, not just any back handspring with a half-twist on any event. The entry is a round-off half on or Yurchenko 1/2.
Darrin please not the Onodi. It’s a faux pas to call it that
What do you call it?
@@darrintumbles4557half on. The entry is literally called Yurchenko half on in the code, let's stick to that, it's as bad as calling it Arabian entry just because of the half turn.
@@deepeshmathuriaNoted for next time 📝
Vaults must be from 2 different classes. Remember this please. Thank you. Hi Travis !
🥇🥇🥇🇧🇷
As a Brazilian, I think the judges could have given Rebeca Andrade a perfect 10 for her execution. The athletes need to be rewarded for the great effort they take to dedicate themselves to artistic gymnastics.
Effort isn’t worth a gold medal, it’s the other way around. If that were the case then everyone competing would just get random bonuses just for participating
@@hazelnutspred3348 There is no random bonus. The question here is a score of 10 for an impeccable exercise. If you think that Rebeca and other athletes, who throughout the history of gymnastics made their presentations and NONE deserved a 10, it means that you have the same archaic view that the jury has. It is humanly impossible to do all the movements perfectly. Athletes who perform impeccably deserve a 10.
Excelente video, ela levou ouro hoje e nos brasileros estamos muitos felizes, seria legal voce fazer uma avaliação dessa olimpiada dos pulos das competidoras, eu assistiria, obrigado !
BELÉM-PA.... Adorooooo os seus comentários maninho....🥰
0.1 pike down, 0.1 low chest, 0.1 off center, 0.1 leg separation on the pre-flight
Off center is not a deduction unless outside the line
@@jboww2121 that’s not true. It’s a 1 tenth deduction if you don’t land on the line in the middle.
You are extremaly attractive
respeita o rapaz ele tem namorado kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
Can you compare with Simone's 2021 US Nationals Cheng
em campeonato nacional nao e valido
alguém sabe se alguma atleta já recebeu 10 de execução nessa prova de salto?
Até aonde eu sei, em uma competição internacional essa foi a maior nota de execução depois que mudou a forma de avaliação, só a rebeca e outra ginasta( que tinha outro salto) conseguiram essa nota de execução.
Agora assistindo o video que eu vi que ele fala da moça que tbm conseguiu
@@adriellyamorim6982 então pelo jeito esse 10 é quase impossível porque essa moça que ele citou deu esse dando salto faz mais de 10 anos
Nadia komaned da Romênia...Só pesquisar vc vai ver
@@AndreluizFreitas-n4j No caso isso foi antes quando nao tinha nota de dificuldade e tiveram varios 10... estao se referindo após a mudança do codigo.
React to more Rebeca
Its not Onode. Its Omeliantcki
She didn’t deserve a perfect 10 because it wasn’t perfect. Beautiful and one of the best ever competed, but not perfect.
Deductions: preflight leg separation, landing off center, pike down on landing.
ETA: someone else said chest down on landing, which I agree with.
Im brazilian and I agree with you
Question: do you have to land perfectly on the center white line with the line between your feet in order to have no deductions? I thought landing anywhere between the two side lines was enough.
@@ParoloAndrenope! Commenter is wrong, you only get deducted if a foot or both feet are outside the lines, I also disagree with the pike down statement. No one can land perfectly straight, it’s not even safe to land like that.
JOÃO 14- 6 Disse-lhe Jesus: Eu sou o caminho, e a verdade e a vida; ninguém vem ao Pai, senão por mim.
Last 10 was Milosovic’s floor in ‘92❤
10 just in the past, don't exist 10 score, perfect, allways has a some imperfection.