Hey Flammy! As a high school maths teacher myself, you gave me a few new interesting ways to ask certain questions / test certain skills. Thanks a lot! If you made a video or two going into detail of your way of compiling assessments, it would be very interesting, and I'd definitely be super appreciative. Hope you feel better soon; I've always loved your voice and accent. Edit: Personally, I think your exam was thorough but also fairly balanced.
Quick point about a typographical error in question five because I'm a big nerd when it comes to all things typography and punctuation (maybe you've figured it out by now, but it might be helpful if you haven't): the reason the decimal comma standard in most European languages doesn't look quite right in LaTeX is that LaTeX, being an English-language system, interprets a comma between two numbers as separating elements of a list (as in ordered pairs or sets) by default. If you wanna follow the German convention of using a decimal comma (which chances are you do as a German teacher, though I don't know that much about the regulations around your parts), you gotta enclose it in curly brackets, meaning you gotta write 3{,}5 instead of 3,5. Or you could just opt for fractions instead of decimal numbers, which is usually what I do when designing math problems. Students have a pretty good shot at just guessing solutions to my problems because they're usually either 0, 1, or Euler's number, haha.
Great video but Part 2 Exercise 1, I think you should have explicitly say that those functions are over real numbers because some may say that x^2 + 1 = 0 have a solution.
At 29:40 I think it would be (x+2)^2-5 as what you wrote simplifies to x^2+4x+1. Thus basically everywhere you wrote 3 for that just imagine 5. Otherwise great flammable video as always❤.
Hey Flammy! As a high school maths teacher myself, you gave me a few new interesting ways to ask certain questions / test certain skills. Thanks a lot!
If you made a video or two going into detail of your way of compiling assessments, it would be very interesting, and I'd definitely be super appreciative.
Hope you feel better soon; I've always loved your voice and accent.
Edit: Personally, I think your exam was thorough but also fairly balanced.
20:47 can you use equivalence here? just because this function has a vertex in (0,0) doesnt imply that it is exactly the function 6/3 x2
You should understand the equivalence this way:
If x=0 then 6/3 x^2=0; and
If 6/3 x^2=0 then x=0
Quick point about a typographical error in question five because I'm a big nerd when it comes to all things typography and punctuation (maybe you've figured it out by now, but it might be helpful if you haven't): the reason the decimal comma standard in most European languages doesn't look quite right in LaTeX is that LaTeX, being an English-language system, interprets a comma between two numbers as separating elements of a list (as in ordered pairs or sets) by default. If you wanna follow the German convention of using a decimal comma (which chances are you do as a German teacher, though I don't know that much about the regulations around your parts), you gotta enclose it in curly brackets, meaning you gotta write 3{,}5 instead of 3,5. Or you could just opt for fractions instead of decimal numbers, which is usually what I do when designing math problems. Students have a pretty good shot at just guessing solutions to my problems because they're usually either 0, 1, or Euler's number, haha.
Great video but Part 2 Exercise 1, I think you should have explicitly say that those functions are over real numbers because some may say that x^2 + 1 = 0 have a solution.
no need to say that, it's a 9th grade exam
@@PapaFlammy69 9th grade? So basically first year university students? Yes please say there are complex solutions
@@thesenate4110 are you restarted
@egh66 no I am in sleep mode
In NL gymnasium, 50 years ago, the answer would have been {i,-i}. :)
12:34 solve for x! , not just x. (All joking though. How would that work?)
can you do some complex analysis of gamma function? maybe with laplace stransform.
me when the me
meme
At 29:40 I think it would be (x+2)^2-5 as what you wrote simplifies to x^2+4x+1. Thus basically everywhere you wrote 3 for that just imagine 5. Otherwise great flammable video as always❤.
What do the students think about the channel? There's no way in hell they don't know
i love you, bro
given 2 vector fields..
Wow harder than quantum mechanics 😳
You need to get your views up else you might lose your house.
the problems seem pretty basic
(45-10)*(80-45)/100=12,25
I can solve any Rubik’s cube in one step or less btw so this test is finished
Do you want a medal?
I think bro wants a cookie
Noob, I can solve two Rubik's cubes with my pp in half a step
21:29 f, g, e, h