Dear Teja …. A million Thanks 🙏 for always reminding me We are All What Is … you are helping me know that We are All One Connected … we are All Life 🥰…. We have no understanding of Wonderful Amazing Miraculous Life Energy ❤️
Sir...You are amazing. How beautifully you have explained it. I have been a seeker for last 20 years but listening you has stopped/paused something in me. I was told that seeking is my biggest hurdle in finding peace, today i sensed it. Thanks once again
Thank you Tesha for your approch to freedom. Very simple and yet so difficult to do. However, I'll never give up this profound approch to awakening. Thank you.❤🙏👍🦃🦃🦃🦃🦃🦃
You're welcome. And..."you" are not the 'doer,' so there could be no difficulty to do, nor an "I" that can either follow nor give up any approach to awakening.❤🙏
Thank you Teja. I liked your key message. I think you actually summarized the whole idea of seeking, what most of us are really missing, and what we should turn our attention to.
Thank you... With this you imediately bring one to the sphere of heart, and that is a right place to be to accept all isness... Beautiful, thank you... Love❤
Thanks you for bringing clarity of this misconception and showing how to FLOW AS LIFE & LOVE to this “character”❤️🙇♀️ It is ironical, that In a dream illusionary, non permanent world….mortal beings look for something permanent! Permanent end of everything painful & Permanent stability in every pleasure. How is it possible that when everything in this 3D World has to come to An End! “Our” peace/pleasure will be permanent? How? It is possible: When the “You” “shifts” from Do’er to Being…..“Living As It Is! Loving All Of It!” It is only possible if the “You/I/Me Dies” into the “arms” of Absolute! 🤗. Love,❤️Peace🕊Freedom 😇prevails.
It seems like a catch-22 where you have to be at peace with what is, when rarely am I. If you don't like life, then any attempt to accept it, just feels phony.
In 1967, l went see Swami Satchitdananda. His answer to the question: “ what is the secret to happiness?”….. Have no preferences, he quipped with his delightful accent. I walked out silently thinking: I am doomed! Lol! And I still am. Lol
In 1972, I was living with Swami Satchindananda at his rural Connecticut ashram. My favorite pointer of his was, “In between any two thoughts, all there is, is peace. So you already have peace. Simply, let nothing disturb it.” I knew I was doomed, too…so I didn’t walk out, I stayed:-) Sure enough, a while later, “I” died. Now all that’s left is something (non-thing) that has no preferences, and it’s peace is imperturbable. Moral: Swamiji was beautiful and ‘doomed’ is good:-)
It's easy (somewhat) to imagine that just accepting what is sidesteps the ego and is what enlightenment is all about. It's also easy (somewhat) to imagine that the very same experience I'm having now, but without the every-thinking and ever-craving ego, is enlightenment, or at least the easy simple acceptance you are talking about. But then there are all the things that come with it: an understanding that space and time are illusory, an understanding that this "what is" is a dream, a complete freedom (for what? to do what?) to say nothing of an understanding of the nature of consciousness (in some schools). That these things follow, or seem to per many descriptions, is what does not seem simple. Surely I have had many moments of near-total acceptance of what is. Haven't we all? But they never come with anything like an understanding that space is illusory or that this what is is no more than a dream. Would love some clarification!
_It's easy (somewhat) to imagine that just accepting what is sidesteps the ego and is what enlightenment is all about._ No. Missed the point. There is 'no one' The never has been a 'separate entity' or 'ego.' Just dream-characters. SO there is no one who can either accept or not accept. There's just What Is. It is natural for dream-characters to accept some of it and resist or not-accept other parts, or to 'try' to have a more 'enlightened' attitude by accepting everything equally. But those attempts are all being done by the dream-character, and so, will not succeed in any sustained way. _But then there are all the things that come with it: an understanding that space and time are illusory, an understanding that this "what is" is a dream, a complete freedom (for what? to do what?) to say nothing of an understanding of the nature of consciousness (in some schools). That these things follow, or seem to per many descriptions, is what does not seem simple._ Of course. That's why the dream-character's 'understanding' has nothing to do with this. That's just the mind, intellect, deductive reasoning, of the dream-character. The simplicity cannot come from the 'understanding' of the dream character. Dod you see my later video "So Incredibly Simple?" It clarifies this.
Sir thanks for your beautiful words. One correction I want to make might be you wrongly pronounce the name of swami Vivekananda ,for few seconds it sounds like what Donald Trump said in his time of India tour. Viveka means bodh means realized. Hope you don't mind. Thanks for your help the way you preach... I am delighted to get you here.
Hii Teja can you some help this question.What do our five senses do during dreams at night?Do the five senses perceive the dream or does the memory in the mind automatically perceive the mind alone?
Being with what is, is exactly what Eckhart Tolle says-but like this guy's doing on this video, he needs to say it for people to hear it, and thereby recognise it's the way to be. Which requires time-just like what is required for watchers of this video to be able to take in what this guy's saying, on this 16:29 video.
So you think so, eh, Darryl? No. This is not to be said 'for people to hear it.' There are no 'people,' there is no one. Just God (Being) talking to God about things God already knows and needs no reminding. If you really "got" the video, you would have seen that. Let go of the illusion that there is anyone who _needs_ to hear anything_ , or recognize there is some 'way to be.' Sounds like you are still stuck in the illusion that the world (which is just a dream-world) needs 'saving.' Clarity is not awakening, and words can never wake anybody up. The words are there only as a smoke-screen for a _possible_ resonance that _may_ occur...or not.
@@alreadyenlightenedwtejaana4767 I can agree with the idea of a no-person reality(as in, we're all just manifestations of the one universal consciousness)-but this here entity still-mistakenly-feeling-like-they're-a-separate-individual, thanks you for your words. And if what I agree is my true state of "no person" is what comes to be how I feel like, I'll no doubt have those words(and similar insights by others)to thank for it. Cheers.
@Mike Bell Well, what do you mean by “OK?” Isn’t that some type of mentally-applied judgment - “this is OK, this is Not OK?” If you are angry that’s What Is. Even if you’re not “OK” with it, isn’t it still What Is? Does being OK or not being OK make it What Isn’t? And yet, isn’t there more freedom/liberation in allowing ALL of it, instead of judging/resisting any part of it?
@@alreadyenlightenedwtejaana4767 Thanks Teja. But isn't Jiddu Kristnamurti quote of 'I don't mind what happens' the same as 'being ok'? Couldn't he also aay 'I do mind what happens'? Does his statement not also have judgement?
No. He's saying "I don't mind." Which means he's NOT bringing judgment (mind) into it. I'm sensing a little gong around in a circle here, like you're trying to isolate or prove a certain point. What is it you're really wanting here, Mike? What's at the core of this?
Whilst I do fully agree with you, it may be that this type of rhetoric only sounds reasonable when delivered from a place of certain privileges; we might consider how a deeply traumatised person could get disheartened at such a message. In such circumstances it is an impossible task to just ‘be in the moment’ & pranayama is a incredibly useful & free method to quickly calm the vagus nerve & thereby giving the mind half a chance at finding even a shred of stillness. Also, those who do gain enlightenment are likely to have spent many lifetimes as a spiritual ‘seeker’ to use your term, & so it is without doubt comparatively easier for them to realise truths effortlessly in this lifetime. & In any case some of those may come to a realisation of enlightenment in many of their lifetimes, & are returning here by choice as volunteers & not by karmic necessity & tbh, people do like doing things that make them feel that they belong somewhere & feel closer to God / peace / oneness or whatever term you prefer & listening to someone teach - just as your subscribers do with you. 🥰 I only caught 4 mins so apologies if you addressed these types of things- this video just popped up randomly as I’m in the bath but it’s preaching to the choir for me so I didn’t persist with it, I just find it interesting to think generally around our use of language when discussing spiritual concepts Sending much love 💕
Thanks Asher. Almost everything you shared here does not apply. It applies only in the dream. You are welcome to watch the rest (beyond 4 minutes) and see if you get more clarity, and you are welcome to contact me directly if you want to go beyond the dream. 🙏🏻❤️
Dear Teja …. A million Thanks 🙏 for always reminding me We are All What Is … you are helping me know that We are All One Connected … we are All Life 🥰….
We have no understanding of Wonderful Amazing Miraculous Life Energy ❤️
Masterful
Love you ❤️
Sir...You are amazing. How beautifully you have explained it. I have been a seeker for last 20 years but listening you has stopped/paused something in me. I was told that seeking is my biggest hurdle in finding peace, today i sensed it. Thanks once again
Teja, as usual your words touch my heart and nudge me along the Path of Compassion.
Brilliant🙏😊. Totally totally agree
Amazing😍many thanks and love🙏❤
so good
Wow, very well articulated. Thank you very much for this wisdom!
Thank you🙏🙏
Love you Teja sir. I just experienced what is. ❤
Thank you Tesha for your approch to freedom. Very simple and yet so difficult to do. However, I'll never give up this profound approch to awakening. Thank you.❤🙏👍🦃🦃🦃🦃🦃🦃
You're welcome. And..."you" are not the 'doer,' so there could be no difficulty to do, nor an "I" that can either follow nor give up any approach to awakening.❤🙏
Thanks and thanks ❤
Love Teja.. Don't mind what happens!! That's what it is!!! Thank you for the simplicity of direct pointing..🙏🙏
Thank you. It’s better be an Accepter than a Seeker. Great wisdom actually. 🙏
SUCH A BEAUTIFUL AND REAL MESSAGE. ❤ THANK YOU!
Thank you Teja. I liked your key message. I think you actually summarized the whole idea of seeking, what most of us are really missing, and what we should turn our attention to.
Thank you so much Teja🙏.... Feeling that freedom, peace and love with what is... Have a great trip ❤
I love you Teja. Thank you.
Thank you...
With this you imediately bring one to the sphere of heart, and that is a right place to be to accept all isness...
Beautiful, thank you...
Love❤
Thank you very much 🔱💕🦋🙏
Thank you Teja ! You are the best !!!! 🙏💕🎉🌺
Hope you have a great time at the East Coast with your most beautiful wife Chakra !!! ☺️😍💞🤗
Beautifully put. Thankyou.
Yes!
Thanks you for bringing clarity of this misconception and showing how to FLOW AS LIFE & LOVE to this “character”❤️🙇♀️
It is ironical, that In a dream illusionary, non permanent world….mortal beings look for something permanent!
Permanent end of everything painful & Permanent stability in every pleasure.
How is it possible that when everything in this 3D World has to come to An End!
“Our” peace/pleasure will be permanent? How?
It is possible: When the “You” “shifts” from Do’er to Being…..“Living As It Is! Loving All Of It!”
It is only possible if the “You/I/Me Dies” into the “arms” of Absolute! 🤗.
Love,❤️Peace🕊Freedom 😇prevails.
It seems like a catch-22 where you have to be at peace with what is, when rarely am I. If you don't like life, then any attempt to accept it, just feels phony.
GUIDING / ENLIGHTENING / EMPOWERING.......
In 1967, l went see Swami Satchitdananda. His answer to the question: “ what is the secret to happiness?”….. Have no preferences, he quipped with his delightful accent. I walked out silently thinking: I am doomed! Lol! And I still am. Lol
In 1972, I was living with Swami Satchindananda at his rural Connecticut ashram. My favorite pointer of his was, “In between any two thoughts, all there is, is peace. So you already have peace. Simply, let nothing disturb it.” I knew I was doomed, too…so I didn’t walk out, I stayed:-) Sure enough, a while later, “I” died. Now all that’s left is something (non-thing) that has no preferences, and it’s peace is imperturbable. Moral: Swamiji was beautiful and ‘doomed’ is good:-)
@@alreadyenlightenedwtejaana4767 Very nice what you speak. Nice to meet you !
I am doomed as well. Lol. I do have moments of peace and hope to string them together while living life. Love to all! ♥️
@@lisalindberg4836 I don't think it's realistic to have no preferences...I think it's the attatchment to preferences that causes problems.
@@awakenotwoke7949 thank you for your reply. It is so difficult to let it go. Through prayer and meditation I am able to see glimpses.
Hello Teja. Im finally finding that consciousness does the meditating. 😅😂❤❤👍
This illusion of a separate human being loves your work Teja, ty! Btw I'm totally rebelling, as u said at 6:54 Totally. I'm enjoying myself doing it 😊
It's easy (somewhat) to imagine that just accepting what is sidesteps the ego and is what enlightenment is all about. It's also easy (somewhat) to imagine that the very same experience I'm having now, but without the every-thinking and ever-craving ego, is enlightenment, or at least the easy simple acceptance you are talking about.
But then there are all the things that come with it: an understanding that space and time are illusory, an understanding that this "what is" is a dream, a complete freedom (for what? to do what?) to say nothing of an understanding of the nature of consciousness (in some schools). That these things follow, or seem to per many descriptions, is what does not seem simple.
Surely I have had many moments of near-total acceptance of what is. Haven't we all? But they never come with anything like an understanding that space is illusory or that this what is is no more than a dream. Would love some clarification!
_It's easy (somewhat) to imagine that just accepting what is sidesteps the ego and is what enlightenment is all about._
No. Missed the point. There is 'no one' The never has been a 'separate entity' or 'ego.' Just dream-characters. SO there is no one who can either accept or not accept. There's just What Is. It is natural for dream-characters to accept some of it and resist or not-accept other parts, or to 'try' to have a more 'enlightened' attitude by accepting everything equally. But those attempts are all being done by the dream-character, and so, will not succeed in any sustained way.
_But then there are all the things that come with it: an understanding that space and time are illusory, an understanding that this "what is" is a dream, a complete freedom (for what? to do what?) to say nothing of an understanding of the nature of consciousness (in some schools). That these things follow, or seem to per many descriptions, is what does not seem simple._
Of course. That's why the dream-character's 'understanding' has nothing to do with this. That's just the mind, intellect, deductive reasoning, of the dream-character. The simplicity cannot come from the 'understanding' of the dream character. Dod you see my later video "So Incredibly Simple?" It clarifies this.
Sir thanks for your beautiful words. One correction I want to make might be you wrongly pronounce the name of swami Vivekananda ,for few seconds it sounds like what Donald Trump said in his time of India tour. Viveka means bodh means realized. Hope you don't mind. Thanks for your help the way you preach... I am delighted to get you here.
Hii Teja can you some help this question.What do our five senses do during dreams at night?Do the five senses perceive the dream or does the memory in the mind automatically perceive the mind alone?
Being with what is, is exactly what Eckhart Tolle says-but like this guy's doing on this video, he needs to say it for people to hear it, and thereby recognise it's the way to be. Which requires time-just like what is required for watchers of this video to be able to take in what this guy's saying, on this 16:29 video.
So you think so, eh, Darryl?
No. This is not to be said 'for people to hear it.' There are no 'people,' there is no one. Just God (Being) talking to God about things God already knows and needs no reminding. If you really "got" the video, you would have seen that.
Let go of the illusion that there is anyone who _needs_ to hear anything_ , or recognize there is some 'way to be.'
Sounds like you are still stuck in the illusion that the world (which is just a dream-world) needs 'saving.'
Clarity is not awakening, and words can never wake anybody up. The words are there only as a smoke-screen for a _possible_ resonance that _may_ occur...or not.
@@alreadyenlightenedwtejaana4767 I can agree with the idea of a no-person reality(as in, we're all just manifestations of the one universal consciousness)-but this here entity still-mistakenly-feeling-like-they're-a-separate-individual, thanks you for your words. And if what I agree is my true state of "no person" is what comes to be how I feel like, I'll no doubt have those words(and similar insights by others)to thank for it. Cheers.
❤
Hi Teja, is it important to be ok with everything that arises?
Is being ok with being angry ok?
Well, is being angry, when you're angry, What Is?
@@alreadyenlightenedwtejaana4767 Yes, but is it possible to be angry and be OK at the same time? That's the part 'I' don't get. Thanks.
@Mike Bell Well, what do you mean by “OK?” Isn’t that some type of mentally-applied judgment - “this is OK, this is Not OK?” If you are angry that’s What Is. Even if you’re not “OK” with it, isn’t it still What Is? Does being OK or not being OK make it What Isn’t? And yet, isn’t there more freedom/liberation in allowing ALL of it, instead of judging/resisting any part of it?
@@alreadyenlightenedwtejaana4767 Thanks Teja. But isn't Jiddu Kristnamurti quote of 'I don't mind what happens' the same as 'being ok'?
Couldn't he also aay 'I do mind what happens'?
Does his statement not also have judgement?
No. He's saying "I don't mind." Which means he's NOT bringing judgment (mind) into it. I'm sensing a little gong around in a circle here, like you're trying to isolate or prove a certain point. What is it you're really wanting here, Mike? What's at the core of this?
Whilst I do fully agree with you, it may be that this type of rhetoric only sounds reasonable when delivered from a place of certain privileges; we might consider how a deeply traumatised person could get disheartened at such a message. In such circumstances it is an impossible task to just ‘be in the moment’ & pranayama is a incredibly useful & free method to quickly calm the vagus nerve & thereby giving the mind half a chance at finding even a shred of stillness.
Also, those who do gain enlightenment are likely to have spent many lifetimes as a spiritual ‘seeker’ to use your term, & so it is without doubt comparatively easier for them to realise truths effortlessly in this lifetime. & In any case some of those may come to a realisation of enlightenment in many of their lifetimes, & are returning here by choice as volunteers & not by karmic necessity
& tbh, people do like doing things that make them feel that they belong somewhere & feel closer to God / peace / oneness or whatever term you prefer & listening to someone teach - just as your subscribers do with you. 🥰
I only caught 4 mins so apologies if you addressed these types of things- this video just popped up randomly as I’m in the bath but it’s preaching to the choir for me so I didn’t persist with it, I just find it interesting to think generally around our use of language when discussing spiritual concepts
Sending much love 💕
Thanks Asher. Almost everything you shared here does not apply. It applies only in the dream. You are welcome to watch the rest (beyond 4 minutes) and see if you get more clarity, and you are welcome to contact me directly if you want to go beyond the dream. 🙏🏻❤️
@@alreadyenlightenedwtejaana4767 ☺️ well you know best, I’m sure x