Remember how Needlefiber almost made all Tuner monsters go extinct? Here’s another instance of this kind of problem. Just ban Poplar (and honestly Diabellestar)
Poplar is alright, but Konami needs to seriously ban floodgates like EVV, Shifter, puppet lock, Calamities, and Droll. If they get rid of those cards. The format would be so much fairer and fun.
@@KeertikaAndFallenTreeSame time though, Droll only becomes more and more of a problem the more these "blind 2nd" decks like Tenpai come into the forefront. Droll to lock the opponent out when you're going 2nd, Heat Wave to lock them out when going 1st...
This is one of those times where I look back fondly on the PePe format where Monkeyboard got limited one month after its TCG release (at that time the ban of Plushfire also got published and admittedly only made official 2 months after the announcement) and 6 months after that it got banned
Plus arguably banning newly released cards months later is pretty dumb! Konami should just put out a a year ban exception for all newly released cards!
@@DANCERcow They have an exception for banning cards for about 6 months/1 ban list after they are printed, unless those cards are causing BIG problems. Means that OSS is now on the menu for banning next list.
OSS helps other decks Konami dicked over by having a Level 1 FIRE necessary to their combo. Poplar and Flamberge are the problem. I don't care if Poplar and Flamberge go, but not being able to play my locals Laval and T.G. decks would fucking suck.
Same thing with Tear-Ishizu-Kash format. No hits to the problem cards but danced around them until a new popular product was released. Same thing with Halq ban. Many tuners died for its sins just so it could stay unbanned. I expect at least 1 ban and 2-3 limited cards from Snake Eyes and SInful Spoils. No way they stay untouched thru 2024.
Take the Konami “try not to release a broken archetype and then ban cards it uses that aren’t a problem and are fun and interesting in other decks” challenge 99% of banlists will fail
Imo Diabelle is the perfect kind of card, hitting her is pointless unless you have like 5 negates. She herself prepares your field and/or puts a body on board for cost. The problem is that poplar should say during the end phase if this card is in the gy then instead of as soon as it enters the gy. If they errata'd that boom snake eyes would keep its consistency but slow itself down on board building options. Or they could have gone with you can set a card that is not named poplar.
@@Deathmare235 By hit I mean in most duels if I see ash on normal it probably means they don't have pop in hand, ashing or imperming ash is typically enough to stop their turn 1.
They should just have those sinful spoils/snake eyes cards with gy effects have an except the turn this card was sent to the gy and only ONE effect per turn only clauses on top of hard once per turns. Having two effect activations off one card from different locations is insane.
The only thing good about the banlist were the cards freed from the Forbidden and Semi-Limited section. The actual new bans (outside of generic bosses like Baronne and Savage) I think pretty consensus were a total nothingburger and 100% not touching Snake Eyes Diabellestar because they hit literally nothing on them directly.
More than anything I'm mad because I just know that they'll take like 8 formats to unban linkuriboh even after hitting snake-eyes directly because that's just how they do stuff
Fire: snake eyes Water: nekroz Dark:tear/teledad/pepe Earth:......maybe spyral since super agent was a earth monster Yeah, you're actually right unless you count spellbooks under tier zero then it would only be wind then
@@DarkSymphony777Zoodiac was Tier 0 I believe and they are all Earth. I would say Spyral is a mix archetype. They have four earths, a dark, two light, acwind, and a water on a quick lookup.
I disagree.They make overpowered stuff with great skill,and their ability to create packfiller that has no chance of even accidentaly being good(War Rock) is unparalleled.Konami knows the game,they just want to nickel and dime players.
@@naamadossantossilva4736 "their ability to create packfiller that has no chance of even accidentaly being good(War Rock) is unparalleled" I'll be quoting this from this day on. Thank you.
Someone mentioned to be how Linkuriboh's ban protects Level 1's (SE's, Kurikara, and Jet) from disruption by Tributing them as a Quickie, but Anima ultimately does the important part in SE just as well. Either way I think it's safe to say banning the boi did absolutely nothing to extinguish Year of Fire.
Just hit poplar and flamberge. Diabel herself is only as good as the cards she can get which.... are the SE cards. No one sees Diabel get summoned in shit like TG and infernoble and go "wtf that's broken".
That's why i dislike competitive players with a big platform and the most deluded takes, talking about diverse formats are trash. While 1 deck formats get cards that lower tier decks used put on the ban list.
Linkuriboh was part of the problem because it let Snake Eye dodge targeted negation without losing monster presence (while possibly triggering more effects). Purrely could do so in a similar fashion if they really needed that search/excavate effect. But it definitely wasn't the MAIN problem or the reason Snake Eye was so good. The months of continued Snake Eye dominance after the banlist didn't surprise anyone, because Konami forgot the deck didn't need any of the cards they banned in that list to be overwhelming.
@@ChaosSwissroIl Let's put it this way: Linkuriboh allows ANY level 1 monster to dodge targeted negation (putting your opponent down a card) while keeping the number of monsters on your field the same. That ability will likely prove to be problematic in the future as well, so it getting banned isn't the worst thing in the world to prevent any more abuse of this fact going forward. It DEFINATLY wasn't the main issue with Snake Eye as a whole as proven in recent months though. Snake Eye is already horrendous, Snake Eye that could also cause an instance of targeted effect negation (which is one of the handtrap types EVERYONE runs, no less) to whiff each turn was even worse, and that's a fact that shouldn't really be in dispute.
@@Lawler50431 If the opponent tries to use a targeted negate on a Level 1 monster in play while Linkuriboh is in the GY, that's a skill issue on the player's part and shouldn't affect Linkuriboh being banned or unbanned. The rest of the Snake-Eyes archetype being otherwise still broken, yeah, that's a design issue on Konami's part. Like you said, Linkuriboh being banned didn't do a damn thing to stop the archetype from being absolutely dominant in the tournament scene. All of that is why I disagree with it being banned.
@@cameraredeye3115 Right... but if you're saying "just don't use Imperm/Veiler on a level 1 then", that means in a deck with many level 1's, Linkuriboh in the grave basically says "You can't Veiler/Imperm my important effects on them unless you waste an extra card for the first" then. You can't say THAT's healthy either. Basically, Linkuriboh's revival effect needs to be changed to avoid that kind of abuse... making it battle phase only could be an option.
The worst part about all of this is there is no way to hit the deck easily. Either you kill it with one ban. Kill it's consistency making if more frustrating to play against. And some cards just straight won't be banned because they have protection from the banlist due to being the current running lore.
It really blows ass some decks abuse cards like Linkuriboh or Union Carrier, while me playin Drytron is not allowed to just send another name to the grave with Nova + Kuriboh or by equipping Dawn Knight with Union Carrier, and then tribute it with Meteonis for a Ritual Summon
That's because we never liked fair. We wanted the strongest monster/ a non-breakable setup on the board as fast as possible back then, and we still want it now.
i mean... two things can be true at once. honestly, i feel like every generic link 1 is just BEGGING to suddenly turn up broken down the line. they're way too good and have been since the beginning
you know for a fact those last hits were awful cuz the format is even less diverse. not to mention baroone and savage were just recently easy to get which is bad for future product ( rarity collection 2)
The issue is poplar and/or flamberge. No one gives a f about Diabel/OSS in decks like TG or Infernoble since it's still a -1 for an e-tele with questionable targets.
Actually, Konami's strategy is to focus on the meta while other decks are not paid attention to. The use of generic bosses is to make other decks viable.
@user-sm1by8qt6z The problem with that is the better and faster deck will use them and outperform with them every single time at higher win rates.rares. To a point where nobody has fun anymore either is a massive no Bueno.
Linkuriboh for sure, savage and baronne are positive bans tho regardless if its linked to snake eyes or not. Generic omni negates arent good for the game long term.
@@zzZDarKCroWZzz can still hope for them to get unbanned also I disagree witchu, just calling them a "generic negate" shows ur not well-versed in ygo, they r synchros bruh they need tuners AND specific levels and savage even needs a link that's a lot of setup for a 1 for 1 trade if x deck can make those synchros they deserve to get what they offer wich is not anything game breaking, if u find those 2 unfair ur either Konami, didn't open good or have a skill issue
look man im just gonna spill my guts in this comment section you can read it or not (it might be a lot) but honestly i cant think of a better place to do so since honestly i think u might agree given the video content- this is surely the result of a healthy, well balanced game environment that is in no way oppressive, unfun, or unfriendly to new players. definitely not mismanaged by a company that sees it only as a means of profit and where the banlist is less about fairness and more about prices of upcoming and/or new cards essentially rigging the tournaments to be less of an actual competition and more of a showcase since. you know. NEARLY 75% OF ALL DECKS IN THE TOURNEY WERE SOME VARIANT OF SNAKE EYES. literally, who cares who wins these shitty competitions if everyone is playing the same goddamn deck? who cares about em at all besides the most diehard konami dicksuckers??? the card game as a whole feels like a lost cause at this point its already so unfriendly to new players (and just so unfun to play since the entire point now is to just straight up prevent youre oppt from playing) that the game might literally start dying out if konami dont clean up their act or just reboot the ENTIRE thing and no, Rush Duels were not a Reboot
FREE MAH DUDE DARK DRAGOON. (and let me have diabellestar engine at three of the searcher and spellcaster with the one trap :D). Sincerely. The one DM player in this comment section.
lets get one thing out of the road , savage and baronne hit were very good for the game , linkuriboh was a mistake and doesnt change anything now to snake eyes , TCG dont hit starters most of the time unlike OCG they just hit one card and pretty much kill the deck , flameberge will definitely get the D next banlist im sure , three insane effects with no restrictions , if not they will hit orginal ss which i really dont want to see it go , that card not only made snake eye good but most fire decks , fire king infernoid infernoble volcanic and rescue ace
Barrone and savage ban were pointless. Outside of Snake Eyes which should've gotten direct hits in the past few formats none of the top 5 decks were even running Barrone and Savage. Manaddium and Infernoble weren't even top 5 decks
And the majority of the time that they do? It usually when the deck is on it way out and then thepat themselves on the back for putting the nail in the coffin. Also, why is mind master banned again?
I only blame Diabellstarr as a joke. I mean, she has witch in the card name. She's also popular, so she ends up being the poster child for the deck anyway, especially with main character status. But Snake-Eyes is the problem.
I knew i wasn't trippin😂 I'm new to yugioh like new new md was my first time playing fr fr and they do that sometimes. instead of banning problem cards in the deck thats overtuned they hit something else that has 0 to do with that deck cause they like money. Like banning toadly awesome before tear came out, which i still don't understand.
MD banned toadly awesome b4 spright, not right b4 tear. It was obvious not supposed to be a tear hit. It was a preparation for spright, they do the same thing by limiting kitkallos on release for tear.
Yeah, it’s time I make my re-debuté into the modern ygo scene-had a brief moment wanting to pull a wheeler w/ Jirai Gumi & Panther Warrior only to get that flame doused by the new xyz scene. Good thing Ash feet still remains gotti. Wish Ghost ogre got meta love. Here’s hoping maxx chows to limited for some diamond hands actions for the return of the Mack 🤞
Damn, he is really getting his money worth out of the whiteboard. Big respect
We g back to the old ways.... From sofa to whiteboard
You know it's serious when he bust out the whiteboard
Linkuriboh: “What he say F me for?”
Saddest “somebody lied to you” to end a video. RIP little guy 😢
Remember how Needlefiber almost made all Tuner monsters go extinct?
Here’s another instance of this kind of problem. Just ban Poplar (and honestly Diabellestar)
Diabellestar is a fair card, the cards it searches are the real question though
Poplar is alright, but Konami needs to seriously ban floodgates like EVV, Shifter, puppet lock, Calamities, and Droll. If they get rid of those cards. The format would be so much fairer and fun.
@@siopaoguy I agree with all of them but Droll. I’ve always seen it as a necessary evil
@@KeertikaAndFallenTreeSame time though, Droll only becomes more and more of a problem the more these "blind 2nd" decks like Tenpai come into the forefront. Droll to lock the opponent out when you're going 2nd, Heat Wave to lock them out when going 1st...
This is one of those times where I look back fondly on the PePe format where Monkeyboard got limited one month after its TCG release (at that time the ban of Plushfire also got published and admittedly only made official 2 months after the announcement) and 6 months after that it got banned
Original sinful spoils was always the problem but konami doesn't wanna hurt their bottom line.
Plus arguably banning newly released cards months later is pretty dumb! Konami should just put out a a year ban exception for all newly released cards!
@@DANCERcow They have an exception for banning cards for about 6 months/1 ban list after they are printed, unless those cards are causing BIG problems. Means that OSS is now on the menu for banning next list.
OG and poplar gotta go
Orginal isn't really, snake eyes was not good before poplar and princess.
Cards are just stupidely broken beyond belief
OSS helps other decks Konami dicked over by having a Level 1 FIRE necessary to their combo. Poplar and Flamberge are the problem. I don't care if Poplar and Flamberge go, but not being able to play my locals Laval and T.G. decks would fucking suck.
the saddest part is the community believing it was true that ebola was the problem.
Can't relate, I wasn't stoopid
Unfortunately, I know too many people who were
It was never the problem, it was just the Konami hit.
Same thing with Tear-Ishizu-Kash format. No hits to the problem cards but danced around them until a new popular product was released. Same thing with Halq ban. Many tuners died for its sins just so it could stay unbanned. I expect at least 1 ban and 2-3 limited cards from Snake Eyes and SInful Spoils. No way they stay untouched thru 2024.
The hit snake-eye directly to make Tenpai and Gimmick Puppet the new best decks
It's milking, konami love doing this.
They’ve been doing this for decades.
Take the Konami “try not to release a broken archetype and then ban cards it uses that aren’t a problem and are fun and interesting in other decks” challenge
99% of banlists will fail
Including the most recent one.
Imo Diabelle is the perfect kind of card, hitting her is pointless unless you have like 5 negates. She herself prepares your field and/or puts a body on board for cost.
The problem is that poplar should say during the end phase if this card is in the gy then instead of as soon as it enters the gy.
If they errata'd that boom snake eyes would keep its consistency but slow itself down on board building options.
Or they could have gone with you can set a card that is not named poplar.
Even with that errata poplar will still have 2 broken effects and one good effect
@@Deathmare235 Right but if you hit ash or poplar odds are you've stopped their march.
@@dibaterman maybe no bans but huge limits will be enough
@@Deathmare235
By hit I mean in most duels if I see ash on normal it probably means they don't have pop in hand, ashing or imperming ash is typically enough to stop their turn 1.
They should just have those sinful spoils/snake eyes cards with gy effects have an except the turn this card was sent to the gy and only ONE effect per turn only clauses on top of hard once per turns. Having two effect activations off one card from different locations is insane.
THESE VIDEO STARTS ARE ACTUALLY AWESOME NO CAP KEEP DOIN EM 🙌🙌🔥
Once the lore MC Diabellstar moves onto her next archetype set in the story, they will probably destroy SE and never look back.
People were saying that the banlist was good (it did nothing)
Master Duel Banlist somehow even did more than TCG did which is saying something
Agree. at best, it just cut Dragon link off.
The only thing good about the banlist were the cards freed from the Forbidden and Semi-Limited section. The actual new bans (outside of generic bosses like Baronne and Savage) I think pretty consensus were a total nothingburger and 100% not touching Snake Eyes Diabellestar because they hit literally nothing on them directly.
People knew it was going to do nothing, it was called a sell more product banlist for a reason
Honestly enjoy this. I hope to see more of this.
More than anything I'm mad because I just know that they'll take like 8 formats to unban linkuriboh even after hitting snake-eyes directly because that's just how they do stuff
I'm still waiting on Glow-Up to be freed 😔
*cries in Wind-Up Partyboat*
@@PaladinfffLeeroy zenmaity needs to come of the banlist😭if colossus can (a card thts arguably equal in power to it) then zen def can too
one is a floodgate the other is an etele not equal at all.
This isn't Yu-Gi-Oh, this is Yugi-NO
Love these videos. Keep grinding
Dig the new format dpboi! You gotta write on that white board so many times it turn black lol
"We've got to have *M O N E Y* !!!!!!"
- Komoney on Snek-Eyes, probably
U can't believe MASTER DUEL has hit these the hardest
I think that we had a tier zero format of every attribute, except light and wind (BUT CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG)
Fire: snake eyes
Water: nekroz
Dark:tear/teledad/pepe
Earth:......maybe spyral since super agent was a earth monster
Yeah, you're actually right unless you count spellbooks under tier zero then it would only be wind then
@@DarkSymphony777Zoodiac was Tier 0 I believe and they are all Earth.
I would say Spyral is a mix archetype. They have four earths, a dark, two light, acwind, and a water on a quick lookup.
@@RazielTheUnborn zoodiac slipped my fucking mind
Yeah, they count for earth
Damn Konami hate light so much that’s probably why they’re making the other attributes op
@@Deathmare235 the closest thing we got to a competitive light format was when lighsworn was released, AND EVEN THEN, it was alright
Would you consider some red string to give this board a real conspiracy feel ?
Linkuriboh ban was braindead, Konami isn't good enough at there own game to make suggestions on how to fix it
I disagree.They make overpowered stuff with great skill,and their ability to create packfiller that has no chance of even accidentaly being good(War Rock) is unparalleled.Konami knows the game,they just want to nickel and dime players.
@@naamadossantossilva4736 Proving that it's a corporate greed issue on Konami's part.
$$$$$$ until you idiots stop giving them your money
@@naamadossantossilva4736 "their ability to create packfiller that has no chance of even accidentaly being good(War Rock) is unparalleled" I'll be quoting this from this day on. Thank you.
@@naamadossantossilva4736 that's the more pessimistic way to view it lmao ur probably right tho
Someone mentioned to be how Linkuriboh's ban protects Level 1's (SE's, Kurikara, and Jet) from disruption by Tributing them as a Quickie, but Anima ultimately does the important part in SE just as well.
Either way I think it's safe to say banning the boi did absolutely nothing to extinguish Year of Fire.
Oh boy professer DPYGO is so much better of a teacher than Crowler, with him as my teacher I'll graduate from duel academy in no time!
WHITEBOARD!!! dope format.
I'm still waiting for them to print a fusion for neos and bladedge that would so cool it would be called edge neos.
Poplar and witch to 1, flamberge banned... I have a dream...
Poplar banned and keep witch and flamberge, maybe flamberge at 1
Yes. Ban flamberge
Just hit poplar and flamberge. Diabel herself is only as good as the cards she can get which.... are the SE cards. No one sees Diabel get summoned in shit like TG and infernoble and go "wtf that's broken".
@amethonys2798 yeah. Ban flamberge and maybe poplar *(cause knowing komoney they'll only ban one so flamberge but I'm not against both)*
That's why i dislike competitive players with a big platform and the most deluded takes, talking about diverse formats are trash. While 1 deck formats get cards that lower tier decks used put on the ban list.
Dpyugioh the professor
Linkuriboh was part of the problem because it let Snake Eye dodge targeted negation without losing monster presence (while possibly triggering more effects). Purrely could do so in a similar fashion if they really needed that search/excavate effect. But it definitely wasn't the MAIN problem or the reason Snake Eye was so good. The months of continued Snake Eye dominance after the banlist didn't surprise anyone, because Konami forgot the deck didn't need any of the cards they banned in that list to be overwhelming.
"Snake Eyes is the problem, therefore Linkuriboh is part of the problem"... Or... The deliberately broken cards could be the entirety of the problem.
@@ChaosSwissroIl Let's put it this way: Linkuriboh allows ANY level 1 monster to dodge targeted negation (putting your opponent down a card) while keeping the number of monsters on your field the same. That ability will likely prove to be problematic in the future as well, so it getting banned isn't the worst thing in the world to prevent any more abuse of this fact going forward.
It DEFINATLY wasn't the main issue with Snake Eye as a whole as proven in recent months though. Snake Eye is already horrendous, Snake Eye that could also cause an instance of targeted effect negation (which is one of the handtrap types EVERYONE runs, no less) to whiff each turn was even worse, and that's a fact that shouldn't really be in dispute.
@@Lawler50431 If the opponent tries to use a targeted negate on a Level 1 monster in play while Linkuriboh is in the GY, that's a skill issue on the player's part and shouldn't affect Linkuriboh being banned or unbanned. The rest of the Snake-Eyes archetype being otherwise still broken, yeah, that's a design issue on Konami's part. Like you said, Linkuriboh being banned didn't do a damn thing to stop the archetype from being absolutely dominant in the tournament scene. All of that is why I disagree with it being banned.
@@cameraredeye3115 Right... but if you're saying "just don't use Imperm/Veiler on a level 1 then", that means in a deck with many level 1's, Linkuriboh in the grave basically says "You can't Veiler/Imperm my important effects on them unless you waste an extra card for the first" then. You can't say THAT's healthy either. Basically, Linkuriboh's revival effect needs to be changed to avoid that kind of abuse... making it battle phase only could be an option.
@@Lawler50431 Or just restricting it to either Cyberse or "Kuriboh" monsters, since it's clearly meant for both.
The worst part about all of this is there is no way to hit the deck easily.
Either you kill it with one ban.
Kill it's consistency making if more frustrating to play against.
And some cards just straight won't be banned because they have protection from the banlist due to being the current running lore.
Ash and poplar should definitely be at one
Professor drew back it again
Linkuriboh wasn't THE problem, it wasn't even close to the biggest problem, but it was still a problem.
And yet banning it did absolutely nothing. Thus proving the point made in the video.
Playmaker and Ai are about to break Linkuriboh out of jail
They're gonna give it the tear treatment eventually. Limit everything.
It wasn't thee problem, it was just a problem. One of many.
My poor Dinosaur Deck died for the snake-eyes deck to basically win every ycs this year.
i saw them imperm lv 1s with an activatable linkuriboh ,it was a skill issue
The whole thing with Snake-Eyes (just like every other Tier 0 deck in history) is a design issue on Konami's part, not a skill issue on the player.
@@cameraredeye3115tbf it isn’t too badly designed, not as op as kashtira
#TakeyourhandsOffFromApollousa
#BringBackSavageBaronne
tbf, Linkuriboh was always up for the chopping block
my takeaway from this is "Feet are da best"
Linkuriboh was a casualty of war
Ban flamberge and limit snake eye ash to 1. Bring linkuriboh back. Format solved…for now
This whole situation is so absurdly funny to me. And I still think Snake-Eyes is not as oppressive as Tearlaments.
It really blows ass some decks abuse cards like Linkuriboh or Union Carrier, while me playin Drytron is not allowed to just send another name to the grave with Nova + Kuriboh or by equipping Dawn Knight with Union Carrier, and then tribute it with Meteonis for a Ritual Summon
Linkuriboh wasn't the problem. It was Snake Eyes Ash and it needed to go
Love the whiteboard teach these fools playa.
I said it before, Linkuriboh did *NOTHING* wrong. Is Konami and the players who shell out money for stuff like this that are the problem
That's because we never liked fair. We wanted the strongest monster/ a non-breakable setup on the board as fast as possible back then, and we still want it now.
21 could you do something for me? Can you get Snake-Eyes on the ban list for me?
for all the people who thought math was useless
[points to vid]
i mean... two things can be true at once. honestly, i feel like every generic link 1 is just BEGGING to suddenly turn up broken down the line. they're way too good and have been since the beginning
you know for a fact those last hits were awful cuz the format is even less diverse. not to mention baroone and savage were just recently easy to get which is bad for future product ( rarity collection 2)
The issue is poplar and/or flamberge. No one gives a f about Diabel/OSS in decks like TG or Infernoble since it's still a -1 for an e-tele with questionable targets.
also snake-eyes diabellstar negates pendulum, for some reason...
No scale ?
Free the Boi! 😭
I still say cut Snake Eye Ash to 1. I would also say ban flameberge but wouldnt that just make the deck borderline unplayable?
Lol. They need that money.
Legendary whiteboard Yugi-tuber PogChamp
Oh no, another “-Eyes Dragon” to be potentially banned since after Dark Matter Dragon and Darkness Metal Dragon.
I don't think Darkness Metal was banned here for being part of a pile deck.
I'm pretty sure he got his eratta while still at one in TCG.
@@glitchmakerygo It did got banned in OCG so I’m counting it.
W : So what we ban ?
K : nothing, but we do put sp to 1.
W : Why ?
K : Experimenting, from 2 to 1.
W : What ??
Guys we need to help him get to 200k subscribers also i love your videos dude 🙂
Ik this is controversial but Savage dragon didn’t deserve the banlist.
No more generic omni negates please
@@gravekeepersven82right, and throw Apo’s ass on the next banlist with them
@@AutomaticVoiceMessageSystemtrue😂
Actually, Konami's strategy is to focus on the meta while other decks are not paid attention to. The use of generic bosses is to make other decks viable.
@user-sm1by8qt6z The problem with that is the better and faster deck will use them and outperform with them every single time at higher win rates.rares.
To a point where nobody has fun anymore either is a massive no Bueno.
Konami making a good ban list i doubt it
I hope they unban linkuri savage and baronne D': also gr8 vid stay safe yall
Linkuriboh for sure, savage and baronne are positive bans tho regardless if its linked to snake eyes or not. Generic omni negates arent good for the game long term.
Konami hates generic bosses, with the existence of generic bosses other decks can survive even if they are ace monsters
@@zzZDarKCroWZzz can still hope for them to get unbanned also I disagree witchu, just calling them a "generic negate" shows ur not well-versed in ygo, they r synchros bruh they need tuners AND specific levels and savage even needs a link that's a lot of setup for a 1 for 1 trade if x deck can make those synchros they deserve to get what they offer wich is not anything game breaking, if u find those 2 unfair ur either Konami, didn't open good or have a skill issue
@@Rafael-y8j9dOnly Konami TCG hates them. OCG and the ones in charge of MD thankfully don't.
@@zzZDarKCroWZzzyou suck at the game
look man im just gonna spill my guts in this comment section you can read it or not (it might be a lot) but honestly i cant think of a better place to do so since honestly i think u might agree given the video content-
this is surely the result of a healthy, well balanced game environment that is in no way oppressive, unfun, or unfriendly to new players. definitely not mismanaged by a company that sees it only as a means of profit and where the banlist is less about fairness and more about prices of upcoming and/or new cards essentially rigging the tournaments to be less of an actual competition and more of a showcase since. you know. NEARLY 75% OF ALL DECKS IN THE TOURNEY WERE SOME VARIANT OF SNAKE EYES. literally, who cares who wins these shitty competitions if everyone is playing the same goddamn deck? who cares about em at all besides the most diehard konami dicksuckers???
the card game as a whole feels like a lost cause at this point
its already so unfriendly to new players (and just so unfun to play since the entire point now is to just straight up prevent youre oppt from playing) that the game might literally start dying out if konami dont clean up their act or just reboot the ENTIRE thing
and no, Rush Duels were not a Reboot
Master ruler 6 coming😂
This game is ass cheeks
Watch 'em will ban crossout 😮
Watch them ban anima next so that they dont admit banning linkuriboh was wrong
FREE MAH DUDE DARK DRAGOON.
(and let me have diabellestar engine at three of the searcher and spellcaster with the one trap :D).
Sincerely.
The one DM player in this comment section.
Dark Dragoon is legal in TCG.
It's banned in OCG and MD.
@@glitchmakerygo
I would like it unbanned in the OCG as I play master duel...TCG's still too expensive.
I FUCKIN DISLIKE WHAT KOMONEY IS DOING WITH THE GAME I GREW UP TO LOVE....
lets get one thing out of the road , savage and baronne hit were very good for the game , linkuriboh was a mistake and doesnt change anything
now to snake eyes , TCG dont hit starters most of the time unlike OCG they just hit one card and pretty much kill the deck ,
flameberge will definitely get the D next banlist im sure , three insane effects with no restrictions , if not they will hit orginal ss which i really dont want to see it go , that card not only made snake eye good but most fire decks , fire king infernoid infernoble volcanic and rescue ace
That's the biggest cap I have ever heard
Barrone and savage ban were pointless. Outside of Snake Eyes which should've gotten direct hits in the past few formats none of the top 5 decks were even running Barrone and Savage. Manaddium and Infernoble weren't even top 5 decks
“Savage and baronne bans were good for the game”
oh shut up
@@HotRed00 i mean they kinda were too generic, imo they shouldnt be used too the point decks prefer them over their own boss monsters
@@nziking2267 When decks have boss monsters as bad as Manaddium Primeheart of course they'd be replaced for a form of interruption
After worlds snake eyes ash will be banned
Well, is more easy ban the relative cheap linkuriboh than the more expensive snek eyes cards
And the majority of the time that they do? It usually when the deck is on it way out and then thepat themselves on the back for putting the nail in the coffin. Also, why is mind master banned again?
Ash to 1/2, Poplar to 1.
Sad the waifu is being blame for the Snake Eye teams, she could of work in any other team but nope, search spell to get more snake eyes
I only blame Diabellstarr as a joke. I mean, she has witch in the card name. She's also popular, so she ends up being the poster child for the deck anyway, especially with main character status.
But Snake-Eyes is the problem.
link ones are its so god damn stupid to have a link 1
I knew i wasn't trippin😂 I'm new to yugioh like new new md was my first time playing fr fr and they do that sometimes. instead of banning problem cards in the deck thats overtuned they hit something else that has 0 to do with that deck cause they like money.
Like banning toadly awesome before tear came out, which i still don't understand.
MD banned toadly awesome b4 spright, not right b4 tear. It was obvious not supposed to be a tear hit. It was a preparation for spright, they do the same thing by limiting kitkallos on release for tear.
@@amr3731 oh I heard it got hit cause of tear but ig that's false 🤷♂️
The main problem is the other stuff on the ban list release tear
Yeah, it’s time I make my re-debuté into the modern ygo scene-had a brief moment wanting to pull a wheeler w/ Jirai Gumi & Panther Warrior only to get that flame doused by the new xyz scene.
Good thing Ash feet still remains gotti. Wish Ghost ogre got meta love. Here’s hoping maxx chows to limited for some diamond hands actions for the return of the Mack 🤞
Ban crossout and call by man
I don't understand why you guys care so much about these YCSs.
Snake eyes isn't a problem
All my homies hate linkuriboh
First