Opponent Blitzed Every Move in a Classical Game and I got Frustrated
Вставка
- Опубліковано 9 тра 2022
- In this video, I play crazy and hard-fought game of classical chess in lichess.org's Classical Shield Arena. The game featured a Catalan Opening in which my opponent blitzed out nearly every move and put me under major pressure.
WATCH LIVE: / imrosen
MERCH: shop.imrosen.com/
SUPPORT: www.paypal.me/ericrosenchess
Check out the ChessUp smart board at bryghtlabs.com/?ref=Rosen and use coupon code ROSEN to save 10% at checkout!
IMPROVE YOUR GAME: go.chess.com/imrosen -- get a free trial or paid membership of premium features like beginner lessons, unlimited puzzle training, and access to their extensive video library.
DISCLAIMER: Some links in the description are affiliate links and I may receive a commission on purchases made through these links. Thank you for supporting my content!
Fan Mail Address:
Eric Rosen
4579 Laclede Ave 205
St. Louis, MO 63108
♙♙♙♙♙♙♙♙♙♙♙♙♙♙♙♙♙♙♙♙♙
WEBSITE: imrosen.com/
TWITCH: / imrosen
DISCORD: bit.ly/2KTDlBK
TWITTER: bit.ly/2sFmNqa
INSTAGRAM: bit.ly/2HspaBa
LICHESS: lichess.org/@/ericrosen
CHESS.COM: www.chess.com/member/imrosen
♙♙♙♙♙♙♙♙♙♙♙♙♙♙♙♙♙♙♙♙♙
See Eric in the Chess State documentary (2015): vimeo.com/ondemand/chessstate
Chess book recommendations: imrosen.com/book-recommendati...
London Opening 8-hour video course: www.ichess.net/sale/8020-tact...
#chess #ericrosen - Ігри
Opponent: *blitzes every move*
Also opponent when only one move is possible: 🧐
Pizza delivery?
If it was me, the emoji would be 😭
Of course she was calculating next moves
Magnus does that too. She thought for a good 1 minute or even more for that move. She did not anticipate this move probably. Cheaters play at the same rate and don't deviate from regular beat of moves.
@@nicomolina it would literally be better to instantly play the only move and then see the opponents next move so you can calculate better
Normal people when they get frustrated: 🤬
Eric when he gets frustrated: 🙂
Missed opportunity: not having the heart monitor.
He gets more views if opponent is using stockfish, by causality, he gets paid more if opponent uses stockfish.
Opponent: rage quits
Eric: giggles in a calm manner :)
What a game. Opponent played really well, unfortunate to spoil that with the impolite leaving without resigning.
At least they didn't stall and run down their whole clock out of spite.
6
I really thought he could win.
Why? It's queen rook. Vs. lone king. Don't get cute by moving the king on a mate that just takes longer. I have forced mate in 2. But let me mate you in 4? That's rude. Could he have just conceded after take my rook and end it? Sure.
@@dankrocka64 I'm sorry, who are you responding to?
Never thought I would see the words “I got frustrated” from Eric 😂
Why ?
@@misterunknown8923 Grow up dude
Yes, and of all things to get frustrated by, I wouldn't have guessed this would be it!
Opponent leaving the game with 23 minutes (out of 20 to start) left on the clock is so funny
maybe it was a challenge
I would take a minute for Bf1... because, after playing that well against a famous IM and having to lose initiative, I would have needed that time to bang my head on the desk. 😋
Such an impressive win-you really took your time and had patience through the whole thing. I normally play a lot worse when I'm frustrated, and half the time blitz my own moves out as well :)
The opponents longest think was when they had only one legal move :DD
"your opponent seems really talented at using stockfish" 😁 . Sometimes the chat can be downright savage . Eric was graceful though giving the opponent the benefit of the doubt . Best of luck for the upcoming I'm not a GM tournament Eric .
Showing a certain other player how it’s done.
I'm a gm
It’s really disrespectful. Opponent just played fast. If he was using an engine Eric would have lost easily
@@KKH808 who do you even mean?
@@Mathijs_A hikaru
The Rook-takes-Pawn thing at the end took me, literally, 5 mins to comprehend. Then again, I never had a chess coach at the age of eight, or... ever, actually. It's invaluable to see you play and sharing your thought process. Ty so much.
Your patience when you play is a lesson on its own.
Moral of the story: don’t blitz out your moves in classical
Opponent played anti-blitz: Ended the game with three minutes more than they started with.
Well he was doing quite well to be fair. Just should have spent more time in the endgame :)
Unless you know theory of course.
a chess game doesn't need to be longer than three minutes
@@sameash3153 I'd say 10 each side
If this game was a blitz time control and Eric was in a good mood, no one would think an account with that rating profile and game history playing at this speed was cheating.
The opponent played very well and had Eric on his heals until the end game. That's pretty impressive for being 350 points lower rated. When I play people 350 points beneath me, or even the proportionate amount lower, it's generally an easy win. That's probably where the accusations of cheating came from.
@@allanshpeley4284 How about when you are tilted and trying to entertain a Twitch stream? How easy are those wins in those conditions?
@@allanshpeley4284 His rank is provisional, so there's at least a +/- 150 rating points uncertainity
@@MrUwU-dj7js Rank in CLASSICAL is provisional. Go look at the account. Over 2200 in both Rapid and Blitz (not provisional) and has been playing since Jan 2021.
@@allanshpeley4284 > or even the proportionate amount lower
That's the neat thing about elo - it already _is_ proportionate. A player is (supposed to, in theory) win 100:1 against a player rated 400 points below them.
Thankfully, when your opponent leave, you don't have to wait until your opponent runs out of time.
I didn't understand how that worked?
@@valinorean4816 lichess detects if you've left the tab, and if you're not back after a set time, it gives the opponent an option to claim victory
It was funny how in the end the opponent had 20 minutes more than Eric even though they started with 20...
I think that the opponent had a memorized uncommon opening and then was calculating on eric's time because tbf eric's did take a lot of time on most moves
Not a lot of time for classical
Classical but blitz LMAO
clitz
wai tno
@@icancu9680 clitz haha thats good that you caught it
@@icancu9680 good one lmao
If it's a bridge, the rook can walk over the bridge and take the pawn.
@4:05, Nb6 was worth considering. Reinforce d5.
39:34 Timestamp where Eric got frustrated
i have been bamboozled
Damn, you bastard :D
@@E12345E well not really... he didn't get frustrated was my point haha
The Beatles had a song about the Lucena position. Lucena in the Sky with Diamonds
Edit: nvm I hadn't reached the engine analysis part at the end of the video
22:25 What was the reasoning behind not playing 29. ... Rxa2? Admittedly I didn't see that after 29. ... Rd2 30. Nxe6 Kxe6 31. Nc4 you had 31. ... Rd3, but 29. ... Rxa2 just looked like you could get as far away from any Knight tricks as possible while getting a pawn for your troubles. I thought 29 ... Rxa2 30. Ng6+ Kf6 31. Nf4 (Nxe6 Kxg6) Bf7 and everything looked intact
Very satisfying win
before the game starts, i quickly studied the thumbnail and think f5 must be the best move for black in that position
The arrogance to blitz every move and then not even resign but leave the game. This would make me so mad.
Enzo Barloa
Does anyone have a link to the lichess game transcript? I want to look at knight to knight to f5 and to push the b pawn earlier in the game.
13:34 someone please correct me if I'm dead wrong with this line: ne3 threatening mate, pawn takes, qxe3 with check, king goes anywhere, qxg5 you're up a pawn and whites pawn on the e file is hanging AND you've repositioned your queen into a defensive role so your free knight and bishop can get active. Am I stupid or is that a viable line?
You sure that is the right timestamp? Because after Ne3 white plays Qh7#
yeah this would be a nice line if white wasn't threatening mate already
That is a very efficient route to be mated in 1.
Nice endgame exercise
11:59 ke3 . Force take then take with queen check, then take knight. Then … we’ll I haven’t got that far yet lol .
Good luck in I'M not a GM, Eric. I hope you beat Levy this year, if you get to play him!
8:55 what about e5? Or d5 once knight is moved then qd1 then bishop out ?
At 15:36 do you think you could've played ke3? If f pawn takes you take with check then you can take the g knight. I feel like it would've cleared your position a tad
nope cuz the white queen is threatening mate in 1
@@miauteuszkoodziejczyk it wont if that knight is out the game, which happens when you check the king and fork it with the knight take the knight, then situation is resolved and no mate in 1 idea possible and it'd open up the situation properly to keep going
@@thomassmallenbroek209 white won't take the knight ok e3, they'll directly play Qh7 checkmate.
Calculate with minimal words: there there there there there there
Can someone explain to me why the pawn was taken at 16:16 when they weren't on the square that white moved to? I'm still learning the basics of chess
It's a move called "en passant", look it up
At least calculating with minimal words: "There there"
@12:50 knight e5 if takes you take back with check and then take thier knight. Your right i am dyslexic e3 not 5, and there is the mate hanging...
Not only Ne5 isnt legal... there is a mate in 1 threat from white
At 16:03 in this position, knight d3 works no? If pawn takes, queen takes and you win the knight reducing stress on your king, if queen d2, queen takes, bishop takes, knight f2 wins the rook and you're still attacking the knight on b5?
Qh7#
@@quartelmanbrottv1367i should have had a coffee before tryna come up with anything 😅
@@TakaGeorge ur coordinates are so wrong I’m really confused
After move bf1 you can play pawn g6 then rook will take in h6 and jump your Knight to e3 threats mate and his queen.. should take your Knight with his pawn then checks with your queen and win his knight back and threatened his rook and his pawn in the center at the same time..
After Ne3 in your suggested line, the rook sacrifice Rxg6+ leads to mate for white.
And instead of Rxh6 there is Nf3 first, kicking the queen back to b4. Then Qc1! is winning (...h5, Qh6 .... Qe7 and calmly playing Nbd7 as blacks position is cramped)
What's this Rosen score promote to bishop trophy thing? 35:01
There is a list of "Eric Rosen" type achievements made by a code developer. They are weird chess situations... a kind of rare occurrences BINGO.
Look for "Eric Rosen's score
Seen your titled Tuesday game vs Hansen. Rematch soon? Revenge?
15:37 can't you just play knight e3 to hit the queen? Then if pawn takes knight, recapture with queen to fork king and the knight on g5? I'm pretty trash but it looks solid to me. Am I missing something?
I was just thinking the same thing.. looks too good, it'd solve the tight situation on the kings side too and open up the position for Eric.
@@thomassmallenbroek209 I stared at this position for like a half hour after I made this comment and can't find a problem with it. Either I'm really trash or Eric missed it lol
@@thomassmallenbroek209 OH SHIT, I SEE IT NOW! HE CAN'T PLAY THAT BECAUSE THERE'S A MATE THREAT WITH QUEEN H7!
This is why I'm rated 1000 lmao
@@hueycotton lmfao i saw it too after running a simulation together and it was so ridiculous i felt so emberassed bc i commented like thrice i just shut down my laptop lmao i was stumped by my own arrogance i ignored the queen mate in 1. Its cuz theres no knight check so theres no force so its still mate in 1
@@thomassmallenbroek209 I'm cracking up rn because it's so obvious. I really thought I found a good move hahaha
Turn 16 knight to E 3? Can someone explain why this wasn’t considered?
Mate in 1 by queen, protected by the knight
**The last position was complete Lucena**
I was thinking Ne3 forking Bishop and Queen. If xe3 then Qe3+. I win the Knight threatening the Rook. Also taking the pawn.
That would be good, if Qh7 wasn't checkmate
13:44, could Eric not have taken the pawn with the queen?
Qh7 mate if Eric takes the pawn
Oh that’s what happened? If they leave do you still get points? Do you have to wait for them to time out or whatever ?
On lichess, there's a time limit for how long the opponent can be offline, after which you get the option of claiming a draw or claiming a win.
Bruh the thumbnail was legit mate in one for black Lmao
no it wasn’t?
why didnt you promote to knight in endgame? for check
Why at the end he couldnt eat the pawn with the rook?
Cause there is a check where they have to move away the king which protects the rook and they woudl therefore lose the rook.
I can't figure out why the rook couldn't take Eric's pawn on f2 because of a check. Opponents rook is defended by the king
You give the first check and if the king moves behind the rook you check again and win the rook, any other move wins the rook right away
your chess has really improved, can see it evolve in your videos, your rating is higher, i think it was the classical preparation which bolstered your rating yoour calculations are sharper
Love seeing blitzers in Classic :D Show of personality/strength/pride.
I blitz in classic games too. Only difference is that I’m 1300
33:25 Can anyone explain why white didn’t take g2?
I’m wondering the same thing
Ah, it’s because then black can just throw a check after which the rook can be taken
Tactical Sorokov #1 got banned in this tourney
eric comic stand up lol
Vast knowledge (as Agadmator would put it) will always triumph over cheap tactical tricks.
Also, it looks like your opponent is the one who got frustrated since she quit the tournament after that game 😂
Always triumph? On the channel that made the Stafford Gambit famous? 🤣
@@mikebaker2436 well, the Stafford fails if the opponent has "vast knowledge"
nice regularity! and of course classical always gets a thumbs up :)
At 14:50 Queen take e5 would be better
Just studying how Eric plays his Chess♟️ games has brought my Elo rating up from 900 to over 1650. He's best training method is demonstrating how to stay calm when you're under pressure & still make well thought out moves. Plus he makes quite complex moves much easier to understand. The Stafford gambit is great example.
33:23 maybe I’m missing something obvious but why doesn’t white play Rxg2?
Because it isn’t legal.
Why is it not legal?
i think you mean white rook takes g2 pawn. im wondering why that didn't happen. what am i missing?
@@MrFQQLISH exactly
I thought 20 minute time control still classifies as rapid?
I think so too but this was with increment so I guess it's classical for that reason
At 33:14 wasn't Kf1 a blunder because of Rxg2?
he explains why its not a blunder at 32:55
he wins the rook because Rf8 deflects the kings defense of the rook, and if Kg3 then Rg8 and wherever whites king goes black takes whites rook on g2, and the king defends the rook
14:40 why not take the pawn on e5 with the Queen? nvm mate on h77
i don't play lichess but i hope the implement a report for rage quiters
they have, im also pretty sure that if you rage quit more the time that it takes until the opponent can claim victory gets shorter
there's no rage quitting in lichess what are you talking about
the rage quitter just loses
@@miguelisaurusbruh1158the people that wait out the rest of the game without resigning, its not as bad in shorter time controls but i've had time to shower and make lunch in a 30+20 game before the opponents time ran out
@@midnattssol8329 Ooohhhhh that, i hadn't think about it because i don't play games that long
i think there's a button to report that after, but yeah it still seems to be an annoying problem
@@miguelisaurusbruh1158 yes there's is lmao. If you close lichess tab in the middle of a game that's a rage quit.
Sometimes i feel this kind of players use engines and make a little bit of mistakes on purpose not to get caught, is that even real?
very real
Real, but not in this case.
Not in this case, sincs such a cheater would make sure to at least keep a drawn position. This person simply played quite well
Hey Eric, exciting game! At 33:39 why did your opponent just give you his rook? Crazy!
What would you suggest?
@@31redorange08 well, surely moving his rook next to his king for protection? Or... Do you believe his experience told him it would be taken soon anyway so he made it a kamikaze rook? I'm not brilliant at chess so forgive me if I seem naive!!
@@BasilSimon The position was very hopeless regardless. By the way, moving the rook next to the king (f4) would've been the worst move, because it would've allowed mate in one (Qg2).
@@31redorange08 I have obe username on lichess: 'Blind _fokker' now you know why!! I try to play chess but just miss soo much! I think il stick to music production! That I can do!!!
You beat a software user for sure ... (not stockfish tho)
On Minute 11:22 their is checkmate by Queen h7. Nobody saw it?
Sorry. My fault. I was wrong
@11:00 the person left the board. One legal move and he doesn't move for 2 minutes. Looks like engine moves the way they were blitzed out.
Except the engine would have showed Bf1 as the only move. Bizarre.
Eric's entire Twitch stream: You're playing a cheater
Everyone watching on UA-cam: You're playing a cheater
The cheater themselves: I am cheating
And yet Eric doesn't accuse and shame this guy on UA-cam. Class act.
True but people who cheat are disappointments in the chess community honestly the game of chess is supposed to be complex and tatically challenging but people who cheat ruin that by using an engine that can see alot further in a line than a human ever could dream
If the guy would have cheated he would of crushed eric, what are you talking about
@@cutiecat2754 well, people who cheat are disappointments in any community, really
This isn't a cheater. Analyze the game on lichess, he's losing multiple times and Eric blunders away the advantage. Playing this fast is obviously a mind game, and it worked on Eric. This guy isn't banned on lichess, plays lots of Blitz and you can bet your ass when you're in an Eric Rosen stream or video the lichess mods are taking this game apart even while it is being played. I could do this right now on lichess, start a Classical game and play on my opponents time and I'd win some games with that strategy even against people rated 300 rating points higher than me, since lichess' rating system is far more spread apart than FIDE ratings.
@@methaneorgan thanks for the detailed explanation, idk why nobody is listening to Eric saying it wasn’t a cheater
ok... am i crazy or would this work? Knight to E3, pawn takes, queen takes pawn check, king moves, queen takes knight? At 15minutes. temporarily sacrifice a knight to gain a knight and a pawn and control that side now?
Ne3??
Qh7#
@@alon3304 😭😭😭😭😭
White threatening Mate so yeah.. Not working :D
Funny thing is, I considered the same thing, but yeah there is Qh7#
I also saw this. But missed follow ups as i always do 😹
23:38 why not taking the f2 pawn?
White plays Rxe4+ removing the guard of black's rook, and after fxe4 Kxf2 white is totally winning
14:44 Ne3 hitting queen threatening mate, if taken queen retakes and hits white kniight
Lmao Qh7 mate xD
@@MrCezarVeliki also you mean Ne3
@@Mathijs_A true
Why not Q to D5 to take the pawn at 16:00
Illegal move...
White has checkmate next move with queen QH1
@@piggynatorcool668 ok I see.
why didn't white take the pawn at 33:33???
Because it also loses. Black then plays Rf1+. If the king moves to the right, then you can just take the white rook with the black king. If the king moves to the left, you can check again with Rg1+ and now, no matter where the king moves, you can take the white rook with the black rook. I assume the idea was to move the rook on the same file as the white and black king, then move the white king and try to give some checks, but I guess the opponent missed that the king can't move from the file after the promotion.
30:23 why not king takes pawn?
king can't take because g2 is covered by black king. rook can't take because that loses the rook after Rf8+ Kg3 Rg8+ skewering the rook. white needed to somehow distract the king from the pawn in order to draw
Why not Qxe5 on move 16?
Qh7 mate
God. Can people stop legit accusing the player of cheating? They weren't. They were just playing heavy on Rosen's time. It's a tactic you can employ in classical games to force inaccuracies. It was Nepo's tactic after his loss of Game 6 in the WCC.
I analyzed the entire game with Stockfish. Virtually none of the opponent's moves were the best move and most weren't even the second best move, and the ones that were the best move were either in the opening which isn't super surprising if you know your theory, obvious retakes, and just common sense moves like moving the rook to the 7th rank.
The long pause after Qe1 was clearly the opponent taking a moment to compose themselves because they missed the tactic. Nobody using an engine would spend close to a minute calculating an only move. Cheaters take around 3-7 seconds to make their moves CONSISTENTLY. Also, this isn't a case of intermittent cheating because there were no brilliancies played along with major inaccuracies by the opponent which is what would you'd expect from somebody with the aid of an engine.
Be better.
I agree he didnt cheat. But how can you say you've analysed this so much and then say Qe1 is a tactic?
@@MelbourneChessCoach Cool. So your whole criticism of my post was that I said "tactic" instead of "candidate move?" Like why even bother posting that?
I'm guessing his opponent didn't see that the knight that jumped to g5 was protecting the e1 square from the queen check, probably thought he lost the initiative or perhaps miscalculated, then spent the time recalculating the f5, exf6, and nxf6 line with the queen on e1 rather than a5. There's no controversy here and the player wasn't cheating. That was the point of my post.
Lots of cheating accusations, but i don't think so. Opponent is just very talented
Instructional!
around 1900 games on Lichess....IMO not using help, just playing fast.
Except when there's only one move to play
did you even watch the video
just because you haven’t cheated before doesn’t mean u can’t start now and just because you’re cheating doesn’t mean you are doing it on every move
@@wsemenske then the move would take the same time, not this much longer. They might have gotten distracted or something
Yea, but he also may have just not gotten caught.
It looks like he's playing with a mix of cheating and his real honest moves. Thats also probably why he lost against such a strong player like Eric.
But there are so many weird moves he made, and way too quickly given the high level of theory.
My assumption is he likely plays with an engine early on, then plays a few moves of his own here and there, and in general trying to play decently fast so that his opponents go into time trouble.
With only a decent level of ability, this strategy of perfect and decent moves at a fast play speed would be enough to beat quite a bit of pretty good players.
Plus, his classical rating has a question mark which means he likely doesnt have many classical games and generally plays faster time formats. So this would also make sense with his speed of playing.
Now, thats not to say he DEFINITELY is a cheater. But his execution of such a niche opening position was far too good for a 2100-2200, especially with him blitzing out moves. And some of the tactics he found, he found WAY too quickly, while also taking like a minute to play an only move. His level of play just seems way too weird.
what's a Jerome?
jerome gambit
You are!
Eric: Takes a long time between moves, clock inexorably counting down. Super frustrating.
Opponent: Blitzes every move
Result: Eric wins
Chat: Cheater!
Eric: Not a cheater
Me: I’ll never doubt Eric again
Me: Reads comment
Me: Agrees with comment
Result: I like comment
Me: Conflicted on format of comment
UA-cam: Format is fine
Me: I'll never doubt UA-cam again
It’s so satisfying to beat such disrespectful animals. He thought he’s so cool moving so fast and then ooopsie. Run away with his tail between his legs.
I watched like 20 ads! It's just too much man
11:47 the advice that Eric is giving here is exactly what his opponent is doing so I don't know why everyone keeps accusing him of cheating... and it's not like his opponent played at 100% accuracy they made a lot of inaccuracies. Can't people just play chess without being accused of cheating??
Only the unthinking trolls think cheater... clearly it was a human opponent.
I doubt he was cheating just cuz the moves weren’t good enough, but I think you misunderstood Eric’s advice. Both players know the only legal move that can be played and both can calculate, but he is saying when the opponent leaves his time ticking then take advantage, it is just objectively dumb to not blitz out the only legal move in any case
Yeah you know you dont have to choose top 1 stockfish choice each time... :D But using time (insane amount) for a forced move isn't proof they use stockfish either. :D it's even more likely they don't tbh (cause he took longer than normal when taking long). It's likely a personal reason for delay. Like, having a habit of thinking when surprised. Or basically anything else under the sun. I personally blitz my classic games. :D it shows dominance! (doesn't matter if you lose...)
Someone named Enzo Barloa used the same username in some chess tournaments and has a FIDE rating of 1870. Seems to be playing way above his rating here. Weird, huh?
well considering lichess online rating is overinflated compared to otb, yea its different ratings
Good info but not necessarily. Lichess is notoriously over rated compared to fide rating. I mean he was certainly playing way over MY rating but its hard to tell from a lower vantage point what’s happening in the stratosphere.
But by simple rating on fide, no he wasn’t vastly outplaying himself on a good day.
@@G1stGBless I am about his rating (~50 below) this is considerably above that level, the instant moves, and the immediate ability to shift the view of where you should be focusing is not at this level. I dont know if they were cheating, but this is not an 1800
There are never people with the same name in the world. Coincidences never happen.
I known someone 1900 flat fide and 2450 in blitz on lichess, not really that strange. And people can have good games. A 1870 fide can survive quite well against IMs
I like when I’m playing a game and, like, my food gets delivered so I spend some time going to get it, and I can just imagine my opponent thinking “why is he spending so long on this move??” Y’all are so desperate to accuse people of cheating for the most random reasons.
I had a game yesterday where I thought I resigned because I blundered, but it turns out I didn't. I was watching UA-cam for 2.5 minutes out of a 3 minute game. When I finally caught on I resigned right away and apologized to my opponent. I hate when people do that kind of thing intentionally.
This guy’s not a cheater, he’s imitating being a cheater. When he takes a minute on an only legal move, it’s a show. He’s a 2000+ strength player trying to get falsely banned for cheating.
Why
Yes why and also why do you know so much 🧐
This lady minding her own business and people acussin her of cheating, and even of trying to get banned as cheater xd
This is not the Eric community I know
Come on. :D it's not like she was automatically cheating cause she blitzed well. You are all so _cynical_! Yes, she used a lot of time on a forced move... but she used so much time on it that it breaks the pattern of being a stockfish user. It was likely a personal reason for a delay. Like, having a habit of thinking when surprised. Going for a cup of coffee, or basically anything else under the sun. Blitzing isn't so uncommon. I personally blitz my classic games. :D it shows dominance! (doesn't matter if you lose...)
Eric gets more views if opponent is using stockfish, by causality, he gets paid more if opponent uses stockfish. Not surprised he's smiling at the opponent while most of us would just resign or smash our monitors
I was willing to give the opponent the benefit of the doubt until that stunt at the end when the opponent simply left the game without resigning. That shows extremely poor sportsmanship and makes me question the person's character and honesty. Does the question mark after the opponent's rating suggest it is a recently opened account? If so, the person most likely has been banned for some previous infraction.
Honestly the dead giveaway that this guy *isn't* cheating (apart from the Computer graph which shows this quite evidently) is that he is using a minute on an only-move. Ya really think stockfish took a minute to suggest the only move possible to be made?
Only way for this guy to be cheating is if he makes conscious blunders throughout the game and is far out of the normal cheating time-usage behaviour on purpose. At that point you're just looking at an indistinguishable mess between cheating players and normal players (especially since he didn't make the best moves after blundering in order to regain the advantage but... blundered more.) so what the lichess mods, and I for that matter, believed is that this guy is not cheating.
Also, look at the game history. Very human.
1000th like on this video!
Hey Eric, your volume in your channel is too low on speakers. Very hard to discern without subtitles,and subtitles hide many cells. Please consider boosting sound a bit.
How could he be a cheater when Eric won the game
she could easily cheat for kicks, and play herself at the endgame only. /accept losses with a certain winrate. :D but I don't think she was cheating. No reason to be cynical.
Thought this was a recap from your tournament. I'm very disappointed
lol
Here's a logical tip: when your opponent has more time than they started with don't criticize them for using time. o_O
So slow and tedious trying to watch this. Perhaps the most boring game of chess I've ever seen. Over-thinking it mate.
This guy plays like a cheater