The Most Powerful Engine In The World

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 24 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 385

  • @edmedlin2936
    @edmedlin2936 Рік тому +32

    I am a marine engineer and I operate and maintain big engines like Sulzer, MAN, B&W, GM, GE, Wartsila, Daihatsu, Waukesha, Enterprise, Fairbanks-Morse, you name it. Retired now, and I miss all that machinery and noise.

  • @Rick-ve6yp
    @Rick-ve6yp Рік тому +71

    If it's electric, it's not an engine, it's a motor. An engine converts the chemical power of fuel into heat through combustion. An electric motor converts electrical energy to mechanical energy, usually by employing electromagnetic phenomena.

    • @charleswronge4743
      @charleswronge4743 Рік тому +5

      Well said

    • @krm8494
      @krm8494 Рік тому +4

      If that were the case, why are cars and trucks referred to as motor vehicles ...

    • @markobrien678
      @markobrien678 Рік тому +1

      ​@KRM
      Because people are mistaken.
      Same for referring to crude oil as being mineral oil.
      No such thing.
      This was an incorrect assumption.
      Crude oil is from woody biomass.

    • @Jason-rn4jk
      @Jason-rn4jk Рік тому +1

      @@krm8494 because for decades there was nothing else to compare the internal combustion engine to that was on the road. You don’t call a steam engine a steam motor…

    • @marvinschuerkamp2490
      @marvinschuerkamp2490 Рік тому +4

      Hurrumph !!! Bro finally someone besides just me has said it !!!!

  • @mehere9524
    @mehere9524 Рік тому +19

    Wind turbines are not engines. Engines cause the rotation of the drive shaft rather than the motion of the drive shaft causing motion of the internal moving parts of the machinery ("engine").

  • @FXE4119
    @FXE4119 Рік тому +3

    How amazing the engines

  • @TimberTitansUS
    @TimberTitansUS Рік тому +3

    I'm grateful for your video showcasing amazing machines! Which one is the most expensive in your collection?

  • @justajo2
    @justajo2 Рік тому +14

    Kind of odd to call a wind turbine generator an engine. You do know the difference, don't you Scary Cherry?

  • @cphilippsen4872
    @cphilippsen4872 Рік тому +3

    LOL, and scratch my head in awe, seeing that WARTSILA RT-FLEX96C and remember thinking, as a 17 year old, how much of an accomplishment it was to hook up the front exhaust pipe to the manifold on a mid 70s Austin Mini! I stand very humbled.......!

  • @ejazahmedabbasi7482
    @ejazahmedabbasi7482 Рік тому +2

    I love your videos. Thanks and much appreciation

  • @forrestbaker6418
    @forrestbaker6418 Рік тому +1

    I Was MOST Amazed with that one engine when I saw it that time. Thanks

  • @kenkappler9352
    @kenkappler9352 Рік тому +12

    A windmill generator is not an engine. DAH!!

    • @JONNIE8OY
      @JONNIE8OY Рік тому +4

      Yes it is pal.
      An engine is a machine for converting any of various forms of energy into mechanical force and motion. DAH!!

  • @TechBo-69
    @TechBo-69 23 дні тому

    God! Huge engine. First time in my life I saw it

  • @cdpond
    @cdpond Рік тому +57

    For those that don't know, here's a little tidbit of technical trivia associated with large mining trucks shown in the videos. The engines in those vehicles don't actually link via a transmission and drive shaft to the wheels. They're actually diesel engine generators that produce electricity, which in turn powers the motors in each of the wheel hubs. It's those electric motors that actually make the trucks move.
    But I'm still confused about the conversation about the GE "engine" mounted on the wind turbines. That's not an engine, as it doesn't run to create power. It's a generator that produces electricity, not an engine.
    It's gotta be hard producing videos that discuss topics that the video makers don't understand very well. This appears to be one of those types of videos.

    • @larry4111
      @larry4111 Рік тому +2

      Yup. Most large modern ships work the same way, as well. They use diesel engines which actually produce electricity to power the motors for the ship as well as the electricity onboard.

    • @rickmcdonald1557
      @rickmcdonald1557 Рік тому +2

      Yes I was thinking the same thing about the wind generators not engines.

    • @jesserawson898
      @jesserawson898 Рік тому +5

      If the video and the maker of it are so brilliant, why does "click bait" have to be resorted to???.
      Have the balls to change the video title to a more appropriate one.

    • @richardpalleschi4807
      @richardpalleschi4807 Рік тому +4

      Yes & a lot of trains are Diesel electric also.

    • @threynolds2
      @threynolds2 Рік тому

      @@richardpalleschi4807 all trains are unless they are 100% electric and powered by overhead lines or a third rail (or steam powered).

  • @o0o-jd-o0o95
    @o0o-jd-o0o95 Рік тому +11

    I think it's more important that you do not want to be in front of a jet engine. being in the back might not be as big a deal. being in the front is going to make you be in the back really fast and in many pieces

  • @Hokay01
    @Hokay01 Рік тому +8

    Wait… you have to bleep the word “War” ??? UA-cam, wtf are you doing?

    • @threynolds2
      @threynolds2 Рік тому +2

      "to" was bleeped also.

    • @sunnydean9611
      @sunnydean9611 Рік тому

      Land marks, and statues destroyed, censored history, WTF!!''''???????????????????

    • @urmomlolgottem
      @urmomlolgottem 5 місяців тому

      There is no war in youtube-sing-say lol

  • @gunner162
    @gunner162 11 місяців тому +2

    Don't know how old this thread is but the current most powerful diesel engine is the MAN B&W 96C, with a bore of 960 mm, a stroke of 2.5 metres, a cylinder displacement of 25.7 metres-cubed for the inline 14-cylinder version, which produces 109,000 hp at 110 rpm. The engine is used in very large containerships (think 'Emma Maersk).

  • @mortimerschnerd3846
    @mortimerschnerd3846 Рік тому +11

    The 5 liter V8 that they described as naturally aspirated had twin turbochargers on it!

    • @johncunningham4820
      @johncunningham4820 Рік тому +2

      No . That was the Initial Koennigsegg Free Valve Engine . Normally Aspirated , making Motorcycle Power per Litre horsepower numbers .
      Later they went to the Turbo Compounded version with 1100 hp . The Veyron Hunter .

  • @ExtremeMachinesZone
    @ExtremeMachinesZone Місяць тому +1

    If it’s electric, it’s called a motor, not an engine. An engine burns fuel to convert chemical energy into heat through combustion, while an electric motor turns electrical energy into mechanical energy, usually using electromagnetic principles.

  • @gerry4407
    @gerry4407 Рік тому +7

    What is wrong with saying World War II, and Japan in the same sentence?

  • @fricknjeep
    @fricknjeep 5 місяців тому

    nice show thanks john

  • @paparoysworkshop
    @paparoysworkshop Рік тому +4

    What's with the cutting of audio? Is it now against UA-cam policy to say world war two??

    • @sunnydean9611
      @sunnydean9611 Рік тому

      There's only one atrocity you will hear about in this country; Think about it!

  • @joshuaanderson3599
    @joshuaanderson3599 4 місяці тому

    Thats not cheating. Thats innovation.

  • @stephengile530
    @stephengile530 Рік тому +5

    It also powered the B-29, such as Enola Gay.

  • @wvsky
    @wvsky 6 місяців тому

    Great video for a change.

  • @AgriFatech
    @AgriFatech 11 місяців тому +2

    The engines on the Saturn 5 rocket were not so big but they were certainly powerful !

    • @cornfilledscreamer614
      @cornfilledscreamer614 9 місяців тому

      Pretty sure it's still the most powerful engine ever made, too...

    • @robertchilders8698
      @robertchilders8698 8 місяців тому

      I worked on the Saturn . it was huge!- for being a single engine! not like the way they cluster the engines today to get more power!

  • @ricardoallen4381
    @ricardoallen4381 Рік тому +3

    Major Campbell!!! He did 2 breaking records! SMART ASS , AND yes he did die on trial 3.
    Prior to last at 140 MPH water and dealy 450 MPH land record and sadly gone.
    Last , (oh wheels) 1997! The blue bird 2 ! Fully steel wheels at 700 MPH record. And still..
    Ty. Missed information page/bud

  • @RoadkillbunnyUK
    @RoadkillbunnyUK Рік тому +7

    Disappointed to not see any rocket engines on this list, off the top of my head I can think of 3 or 4 engines that have jaw dropping power. For example; the F1 that powered the Saturn 5 first stage on the Apollo missions, the RS25 engines that powered the space shuttle and now the new Artemis rocket and you also have rockets like the SpaceX raptor and Blue Origin’s BE4 engine that are also set to break some records!

    • @guitarman4242
      @guitarman4242 5 місяців тому

      agree on the F1. 1.5 million lbs of thrust per engine. 5 mounted on the first stage of the Saturn 5 = 7.5 million lbs of thrust. Truly impressive

  • @karlklein2966
    @karlklein2966 Рік тому +6

    Why did you mute "World War II" at 4:56 and 5:16 but then leave it in at 22:22?

    • @andyharman3022
      @andyharman3022 Рік тому

      Because the R4360 didn't power the B29 in WW2, which is what he was intending to say. It did power the B50, but that was after WW2.

    • @karlklein2966
      @karlklein2966 Рік тому

      @@andyharman3022 Ok, that makes sense. Thanks. What were the B29's running during the war?

    • @andyharman3022
      @andyharman3022 Рік тому

      @@karlklein2966 Curtiss-Wright R3350's

    • @CeeHDeeJEggleton
      @CeeHDeeJEggleton 8 місяців тому

      ​@@karlklein2966see moo

  • @89ludeawakening1
    @89ludeawakening1 Рік тому +11

    I honestly wouldn't have put the SHOCKWAVE jet truck on here. The truck had a malfunction and was destroyed in a crash last year. Chris Darnell who was driving it lost his life in the accident.

    • @the_car_guy5915
      @the_car_guy5915 Рік тому +3

      I saw that video, everything was weird about it. It looked like the explosion happened ahead of the truck and the truck spun out into it.

    • @MevRB19
      @MevRB19 8 місяців тому

      Cancel culture at work again.....

  • @texaschilli5684
    @texaschilli5684 3 місяці тому

    ماشاءالله تبارك الله ولا حول ولاقوة الابالله فن ❤

  • @briantairea8407
    @briantairea8407 Рік тому +3

    not sure if this fits in. We used to have the bigger the sound speakers the louder you are. Now it's just a small blue tooth speakers

  • @hardkoregamer1981
    @hardkoregamer1981 Рік тому +4

    The first Engine in this video reminds me of the engine in the 1927 movie metropolis.

  • @realpatriot5896
    @realpatriot5896 10 місяців тому

    I used to build skids with mostly big Catapillar diesel and natural gas engines but also some Detroit diesel engines and occasionally a couple of other brands.

  • @einosiirila7093
    @einosiirila7093 Рік тому +1

    Beautiful ❤️ I wish it was a little closer 🥰💯

  • @GG-yr5ix
    @GG-yr5ix Рік тому +3

    B-50 did not fly in WWII, the B-29 did which is what the B-50 came from. B-29 had R-3350s and they were problematic during the war.

  • @JesusTorres-qr1gz
    @JesusTorres-qr1gz Рік тому

    Those engines were design to out last all of us.

  • @christineMaccallum-uo3qx
    @christineMaccallum-uo3qx 10 місяців тому

    More and more Mistry in history and facts 😮

  • @mikerichardson7658
    @mikerichardson7658 Рік тому +2

    That's what powers Hunter's lap top

  • @brianthesnail3815
    @brianthesnail3815 10 місяців тому +1

    The Caterpillar GCM34 is natural gas powered engine used in power generation that puts out 10 MW. Very useful as near instant backup power. Then depending how high you want to go and how far you want to stretch the definition of 'engine' the General Electric 9HA industrial gas turbine puts out 838 megawatts in combined cycle mode - which is a big city sized power output in one machine.

  • @farmsimaussie1992
    @farmsimaussie1992 Рік тому +9

    Gas for Engines, Electricity for Motors.. There is a big difference...

    • @CadenMoskol
      @CadenMoskol Рік тому +1

      they are synonyms

    • @theknifedude1881
      @theknifedude1881 Рік тому +2

      I agree, electric motors are going to get larger and larger and engines are going to get interesting. Check out the Omega, being developed by Astron Aerospace. Autoline After Hours has an interview with two of the inventors. Small, high revving, and high horsepower.

    • @andyharman3022
      @andyharman3022 Рік тому +1

      General Motors makes engines that run on gasoline and diesel. So does Ford Motor Co. And they also make electric motors. A motor is anything that provides motive power.

    • @kalaharimine
      @kalaharimine Рік тому +1

      Not really.
      The first engines were combustible fuel / steam driven.
      The largest engines now by far are nuclear fueled steam turbines.

  • @BaronVonEvil1
    @BaronVonEvil1 Рік тому +8

    I'm surprised that the Saturn 5 rocket engines did not make the list of most powerful engines.

  • @arteleonard2405
    @arteleonard2405 Рік тому +4

    You forgot the 16 millon horse power Saturn V rocket engine that men to the moon

  • @gmeast
    @gmeast Рік тому +4

    Why couldn't they say "World War II"??????

  • @tedtw
    @tedtw 11 місяців тому

    Boeing was the first manufacturer to get their 2-engine 757 FAA certified for trans-oceanic flight. FFA requires all commercial aircraft must be able to stay flying with ONE engine shut down. You read it right - the 757 aircraft, fully loaded with cargo and people, stays in level flight with only ONE engine running.
    I was the project manager for Boeing's Jet Engine Test Stand switching system used at their huge Everett, WA plant for testing engines used on every commercial jet aircraft they manufacture. Engines weighed 10,000 pounds and produced 40,000 pounds of thrust each. Each plane has 7 miles of orange flight test wiring used only once - to FAA certify the aircraft to be flight worthy. Then the 7 miles of orange wiring/cables are all ripped out by a work crew..

  • @leehauxwell1149
    @leehauxwell1149 Рік тому

    Impressed by all those Emm Double yous produced by that windmill 😂

  • @tripjet999
    @tripjet999 Рік тому +1

    "KA-wasaki," not "COW-asaki."

  • @JurgenStrauss-ow2ge
    @JurgenStrauss-ow2ge 10 місяців тому +1

    To my knowledge , the MAN 14L 96/314 is the biggest piston engine : 14 cylinder in line , bore 96 cm , stroke 314 cm - 118 000 hp .

    • @ufo2go
      @ufo2go 10 місяців тому +1

      lets ask Grok

    • @ufo2go
      @ufo2go 10 місяців тому +1

      The most powerful engine in the world is the GE9X, a high-bypass turbofan jet engine developed by GE Aviation. This mighty beast powers the Boeing 777X and boasts a maximum thrust of up to 330 KN, with a dry weight of 5800 kg. It features fuel burn reduction technology, which not only reduces engine noise but also makes it more efficient.
      Fun fact: The GE9X's fan is a whopping 123 inches in diameter, making it larger than the fuselage of a Boeing 737!
      So, if you're looking to power your next interdimensional spaceship or just want to impress your friends at a dinner party, the GE9X is the engine for you!

  • @aeromach2007
    @aeromach2007 Рік тому +5

    Actually #18 powered the B-29 bomber first which did what he said, not the B-50 which was built after the war.

    • @mrvair50
      @mrvair50 Рік тому +1

      The B-29 was powered by 18 cyl. Wright R3350 engines during WW2. And like you said, the B-50 was built after the war using the 27 cyl. Pratt & Whitney R4360 engines.

  • @tellyonthewall8751
    @tellyonthewall8751 10 місяців тому

    that pi55 at 2:35 is photo shopped

  • @joeerskine3920
    @joeerskine3920 Рік тому +5

    Your accuracy leaves a bit on the table....

  • @DavidRankln
    @DavidRankln Рік тому +1

    Electric is not an engine, it's a motor. An engine is a primary fuel consumer.

    • @ellieprice363
      @ellieprice363 Рік тому

      Hmm, electric motors are powered by primary fossil fuels from a distant source. So if that is the definition electric motors are indeed engines. You might say they have extra long extension cords. 🤓🤓

  • @terminusest5902
    @terminusest5902 Рік тому

    An atomic bomb test in Australia blew a Centurion tank 10 feet. It became Australia's first nuclear tank. It later saw service in Vietnam. The tank still exists. Centurion 169041 is likely the only tank in history to have been hit by an atomic blast and not only survive, but fight in combat afterwards. This tough old tank was designed to fight the Germans in WWII, but proved itself capable of standing up to a nuclear bomb too.
    This particular Centurion was subjected to a 10 kiloton nuclear bomb from a distance of around 400 meters in the Australian Outback. Test crews returned expecting to find pieces of what was once a Centurion scattered around the site, but they were shocked to the tank in one piece and still functional. Once refueled it drove off.
    Centurion 169041’s unique distinction of living through the test was reflected by its well-earned nickname: The Atomic Tank. Centurions were designed during WW2 to take on German Tiger and other tanks. To make it go they used a version of the Rolls Royce Merlin fighter engine. The war ended before they saw action.

  • @jijzer3284
    @jijzer3284 10 місяців тому +1

    Windmills are not engines that are only waste of money

  • @moviesontheweb
    @moviesontheweb Рік тому +3

    Can't tolerate the computer-generated voice overlay.

  • @gsp911
    @gsp911 11 місяців тому

    An addition to the first to be shown, the 8 cylinder engine weighs over 3.000.000 lbs, that's 1400 ton.
    They start it up every two weeks and let it run for 10 min.

  • @bigdaddylawman
    @bigdaddylawman 10 місяців тому

    Yes, an American video which talks about jet engines without mentioning the mighty Rolls-Royce Trent engine which is fitted to many 747s and A380s amongst others.

  • @coalthedergsune
    @coalthedergsune Рік тому +7

    I'm on team hydrogen, what's going to happen with all of those highly flammable Li-Ion batteries when they stop working?
    they'll just sit in a junkyard, rot, catch fire, and release a fuckton of toxic gasses

  • @dundonrl
    @dundonrl Рік тому +12

    You missed the most powerful "engine" there is.. the GE Harriet 9HA.02, which by itself generates 765,723 hp! When you use it as a combined cycle generator (using the exhaust to boil water that spins a steam turbine) it generates 1,123,777 hp!!

    • @jacksimpson-rogers1069
      @jacksimpson-rogers1069 Рік тому +3

      1,123,777 hp is just about 838 MW (megawatts)
      Palo Verde nuclear power plant has three electric generators each producing 1,400 MW, each driven by a nuclear reactor supplying heat of about twice that power. Industrial steam IS a gas. A steam turbine is a "heat engine" governed by the strict laws of thermodynamics. So reactor power is given as MWth (thermal) and its electricity production as MWe.

    • @wanderschlosser1857
      @wanderschlosser1857 10 місяців тому +1

      Electric generators are not engines they're the driven equipment. The driver in case of a nuke plant would be a steam turbine. However I wouldn't call that an engine either because it's only the gas (steam) to mechanical power converter not including the steam generator. The above mentioned gas turbine combines the gas generation out of chemical energy and the power conversion part, it can therefore actually be called an engine. I stick with the GE 9HA for being the most powerful engine.

  • @daveblevins
    @daveblevins Рік тому +6

    I remember back in early '79, I helped with an overhaul of a Waukesha-Pearce HUGE diesel engine in the Grand Canyon. (above Havasupai) on Long Mesa. There were three engines running really gig generators. Two of them ran all the time, but not full speed for too long. One could handle all night, but you needed both during the day for air conditioning etc. Then they ran the backup unit when we overhauled one of the big ones. It was a very good experience. I'll never forget Mr Emil Slotten 👍 Excellent man. 🙏

  • @ryanjosef
    @ryanjosef Рік тому +5

    wait , you cant even say w w as a historical reference now? wtaf?

    • @TheSilmarillian
      @TheSilmarillian Рік тому +2

      The PC brigades version of George Orwell's thought police I would surmise

  • @KartikPatel-nt4ff
    @KartikPatel-nt4ff Рік тому

    😅😅😅😅well information good show 😅😅

  • @genespurlin7090
    @genespurlin7090 Місяць тому

    U forgot the 16-cylinder Cooper Besemer

  • @ngauruhoezodiac3143
    @ngauruhoezodiac3143 Рік тому

    The engines on the Saturn 5 rocket were not so big but they were certainly powerful.

  • @58nunzi
    @58nunzi Рік тому +6

    I thought the most powerful engines would be found in ships. No mention here. So I would say this clip is BS.

  • @jamesmoore8558
    @jamesmoore8558 Рік тому +1

    In the Sierra Nevada there is a ski resort that has no outside power they have a building with 6 Caterpiller given generators when you enter the building you can't hear anything but the engines

  • @liberty4617
    @liberty4617 11 місяців тому

    the space shuttle is the most powerful thing ever built with engines

    • @ufo2go
      @ufo2go 10 місяців тому

      Space X Starships 33 raptor engines blow the shuttle out the water!

    • @liberty4617
      @liberty4617 10 місяців тому

      not sure if i understand , does the space x raptor have 33 engines or is that a designation number ?

  • @helinareinapae3418
    @helinareinapae3418 Рік тому

    All of the engens are super powerful i liked all of the 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

  • @galewinds7696
    @galewinds7696 Рік тому +1

    I wonder if I could back that up to my Allison trans.

  • @rrommens4527
    @rrommens4527 Рік тому +4

    Beautiful engines, although not the most powerful as the title suggests. And for a windmill its called a generator and MW is MegaWatt.

  • @sjsz06
    @sjsz06 Рік тому +9

    The Haliade-X 12 MW isn't an engine, it's a wind powered electricity generator...

    • @stephandreischl
      @stephandreischl Рік тому +1

      Saved me for writing it...slight difference..

  • @paula2908
    @paula2908 Рік тому +1

    Pollution big time! All that smoke!

  • @SeeTheWholeTruth
    @SeeTheWholeTruth Рік тому

    Not even close. You dont have a single ship engine? Cmon now..

  • @kiritvara257
    @kiritvara257 Рік тому

    yes , Cummins diesel makes some impressive small and big engines

  • @leosmith848
    @leosmith848 Рік тому +1

    Pretty much everything said about the wind turbine is marketing propaganda

  • @craigmccall7450
    @craigmccall7450 10 місяців тому +1

    Coal powered train...bad.
    Coal powered electric train...good. 😂

  • @Seasherm
    @Seasherm Рік тому +1

    Large slow speed diesels either on ship or shoreside power plants are above 80 Megawatts/110,000 HP. None of the smaller engines come close. There are Gas Turbines above 250 Megawatts in shoreside plants

  • @paulplus3830
    @paulplus3830 Рік тому +2

    Energy is not created.

  • @andyharman3022
    @andyharman3022 Рік тому +5

    Here, let me help out with your engineering unit problems:
    MW is Megawatts, a unit of power, one million Watts
    lbf is pounds force, a measure of thrust in jet engines
    Torque is not expressed in pounds per foot (that is spring rate), it is expressed as pounds*feet.

  • @qapla
    @qapla Рік тому +4

    The Big Boy 4014 should be in the top 10 instead of two motorcycles that are neither as large, powerful or complex at the world's largest steam train engine.

  • @blacksheep8227
    @blacksheep8227 Рік тому +2

    I want a jet engine in my Fiero.

  • @theknifedude1881
    @theknifedude1881 Рік тому +1

    That looks like the same centipede that threatened me in another video. Busy bug.

  • @taunteratwill1787
    @taunteratwill1787 Рік тому +2

    Clickbait. The Most Powerful Engine In The World?
    SO WHERE IS IT? Not in your video, that's for sure! 😎

  • @robertm4914
    @robertm4914 5 місяців тому

    Nobody ever show cases the manufacture of one of those wind turbines. I wonder why and how much emissions are produced?

  • @jimwells4240
    @jimwells4240 Місяць тому

    4014 Big Boy is still operating

  • @Niceboy-uw5ni
    @Niceboy-uw5ni 7 місяців тому

    #sweet topic I think it’s for a boat

  • @Jimmy-kk8ez
    @Jimmy-kk8ez 4 місяці тому +1

    Why the censorship? Trying to change history? Control the narrative?

  • @adamfox4039
    @adamfox4039 Рік тому +2

    There is a good candidate I've recently heard about for this list. It's a semi truck called Thor. A custom job of course, but seriously impressive in stature and I think deserves its place among the rest. Thank you for all your videos. I've enjoyed every one I've seen.

    • @Romans--bo7br
      @Romans--bo7br Рік тому

      @adamfox4039.... Al sold "Thor", not long after he finished it, to an Oil Sheik in the middle east, for $14.7M.... almost exactly double what it cost him to build it.

  • @390WagonMaster
    @390WagonMaster Рік тому +1

    Here I will say it World War Two.

  • @rusty383
    @rusty383 Рік тому

    I tought the wind was the Engine and that was the Generator

  • @janetdoten4489
    @janetdoten4489 Рік тому +3

    The wing span of a B52 boomer is awesome! I don't know what the horsepower is but the fact it needs wheels on the wing tips is Wow!

    • @fm00078
      @fm00078 Рік тому

      HUGE fuel tanks inside the wings needs support.

    • @leeroymeadows5566
      @leeroymeadows5566 Рік тому +1

      Buff is beautiful ,but set next to a B36 ,it looks like a Cessna 150. I think of Buff as themost successful Aircraft ever because of its longevity .Probably the only aircraft 3 generations of pilots have flown .

  • @2545810
    @2545810 Рік тому

    The most powerful engine is the engines used to lift spacecraft into space. Each has over 500,000 HP

  • @geoffschulz
    @geoffschulz Рік тому +2

    10:28 Haliade-X 12 MW is not an engine! It is a generator. The "Engine" is the wind. You keep referring to "MW"... do you not know what a Mega Watt is?

  • @kevinflick61
    @kevinflick61 Рік тому

    The wind turbines considered motors? I thought that they were simply called generators.

  • @a.e.gresel312
    @a.e.gresel312 Рік тому +1

    What about the nucleair powered aircraftcarriers wich run for years on no end? They have a massive propulsion system wich can be seen as the engine of the ship. 2x 194 MegaWatts is a lot of power if you ask me.

  • @FriendsofVeteransPark
    @FriendsofVeteransPark Рік тому

    Where is the F-1 engine used in the Saturn V moon rocket with its 1.8 million lbs. of thrust? Its fuel pump alone put out 55,000 horsepower.

  • @juriparn1296
    @juriparn1296 Рік тому

    There is one Big Boy in the Ford Museum in Detroit, Michigan

  • @BLD426
    @BLD426 6 місяців тому

    Shockwave has 3 jet engines, actually.

  • @8546Ken
    @8546Ken Рік тому +3

    If the Wärtsilä engine is not a Diesel, what is it?

    • @sagebrushbob2321
      @sagebrushbob2321 Рік тому

      Heavy oil powered. Sort of like cold, used motor oil. Must be pre-heated before use. Heavy oil is preferred for these large engines because it has a higher energy output per liter than diesel.

    • @8546Ken
      @8546Ken Рік тому

      @@sagebrushbob2321 OK, but what's the principle? What ignites the heavy oil?

    • @SR-ml4dn
      @SR-ml4dn Рік тому +1

      @@8546Ken it is ignited in the same manner as diesel no difference. The pressure approx. 1000 bar will ignite the fuel when its pump into the cylinder. HFO (Heavy fuel Oil) is preheated and send through a centrifuge and into a fuel plunger ready to push it in the cylinder when the piston has reach TDC.

  • @maxpayne2574
    @maxpayne2574 Рік тому

    The big diesel is likely for a huge container ship.

  • @rickmcdonald1557
    @rickmcdonald1557 Рік тому +3

    Great video and narration but I have always wondered why someone would use a Turbo over a Super Charger as a turbo causes so much heat and friction and heat is an engines biggest enemy. Someone watching this video probably knows Huh???

    • @ellieprice363
      @ellieprice363 Рік тому +2

      A super charger uses engine horsepower to create more horsepower. A turbocharger uses excess exhaust heat to generate “free” horsepower that would otherwise be wasted. Turbochargers are therefore
      more efficient than superchargers. ICE’s are “heat” engines so heat is not their biggest enemy. In fact many thousands of degrees of heat is what makes internal combustion engines work.

  • @xyfnthrn714
    @xyfnthrn714 Рік тому

    He forgot the galo 12 and the galo 24