The Most Powerful Engine In The World

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 387

  • @edmedlin2936
    @edmedlin2936 Рік тому +33

    I am a marine engineer and I operate and maintain big engines like Sulzer, MAN, B&W, GM, GE, Wartsila, Daihatsu, Waukesha, Enterprise, Fairbanks-Morse, you name it. Retired now, and I miss all that machinery and noise.

  • @karlklein2966
    @karlklein2966 Рік тому +6

    Why did you mute "World War II" at 4:56 and 5:16 but then leave it in at 22:22?

    • @andyharman3022
      @andyharman3022 Рік тому

      Because the R4360 didn't power the B29 in WW2, which is what he was intending to say. It did power the B50, but that was after WW2.

    • @karlklein2966
      @karlklein2966 Рік тому

      @@andyharman3022 Ok, that makes sense. Thanks. What were the B29's running during the war?

    • @andyharman3022
      @andyharman3022 Рік тому

      @@karlklein2966 Curtiss-Wright R3350's

    • @CeeHDeeJEggleton
      @CeeHDeeJEggleton 11 місяців тому

      ​@@karlklein2966see moo

  • @Rick-ve6yp
    @Rick-ve6yp Рік тому +71

    If it's electric, it's not an engine, it's a motor. An engine converts the chemical power of fuel into heat through combustion. An electric motor converts electrical energy to mechanical energy, usually by employing electromagnetic phenomena.

    • @charleswronge4743
      @charleswronge4743 Рік тому +5

      Well said

    • @krm8494
      @krm8494 Рік тому +4

      If that were the case, why are cars and trucks referred to as motor vehicles ...

    • @markobrien678
      @markobrien678 Рік тому +1

      ​@KRM
      Because people are mistaken.
      Same for referring to crude oil as being mineral oil.
      No such thing.
      This was an incorrect assumption.
      Crude oil is from woody biomass.

    • @Jason-rn4jk
      @Jason-rn4jk Рік тому +1

      @@krm8494 because for decades there was nothing else to compare the internal combustion engine to that was on the road. You don’t call a steam engine a steam motor…

    • @marvinschuerkamp2490
      @marvinschuerkamp2490 Рік тому +4

      Hurrumph !!! Bro finally someone besides just me has said it !!!!

  • @ejazahmedabbasi7482
    @ejazahmedabbasi7482 Рік тому +2

    I love your videos. Thanks and much appreciation

  • @geoffschulz
    @geoffschulz Рік тому +2

    10:28 Haliade-X 12 MW is not an engine! It is a generator. The "Engine" is the wind. You keep referring to "MW"... do you not know what a Mega Watt is?

  • @fricknjeep
    @fricknjeep 7 місяців тому

    nice show thanks john

  • @TitansMilitaryAnalysis
    @TitansMilitaryAnalysis Рік тому +3

    I'm grateful for your video showcasing amazing machines! Which one is the most expensive in your collection?

  • @paparoysworkshop
    @paparoysworkshop Рік тому +4

    What's with the cutting of audio? Is it now against UA-cam policy to say world war two??

    • @sunnydean9611
      @sunnydean9611 Рік тому

      There's only one atrocity you will hear about in this country; Think about it!

  • @FXE4119
    @FXE4119 Рік тому +3

    How amazing the engines

  • @forrestbaker6418
    @forrestbaker6418 Рік тому +1

    I Was MOST Amazed with that one engine when I saw it that time. Thanks

  • @KartikPatel-nt4ff
    @KartikPatel-nt4ff Рік тому

    😅😅😅😅well information good show 😅😅

  • @WorldTechnologySun
    @WorldTechnologySun Місяць тому

    amazing

  • @cphilippsen4872
    @cphilippsen4872 Рік тому +3

    LOL, and scratch my head in awe, seeing that WARTSILA RT-FLEX96C and remember thinking, as a 17 year old, how much of an accomplishment it was to hook up the front exhaust pipe to the manifold on a mid 70s Austin Mini! I stand very humbled.......!

  • @mehere9524
    @mehere9524 Рік тому +20

    Wind turbines are not engines. Engines cause the rotation of the drive shaft rather than the motion of the drive shaft causing motion of the internal moving parts of the machinery ("engine").

  • @Hokay01
    @Hokay01 Рік тому +8

    Wait… you have to bleep the word “War” ??? UA-cam, wtf are you doing?

    • @threynolds2
      @threynolds2 Рік тому +2

      "to" was bleeped also.

    • @sunnydean9611
      @sunnydean9611 Рік тому

      Land marks, and statues destroyed, censored history, WTF!!''''???????????????????

    • @urmomlolgottem
      @urmomlolgottem 7 місяців тому

      There is no war in youtube-sing-say lol

  • @allansplace
    @allansplace Рік тому

    Why are there blanks in the sound at 4:56 and 5:17? The commentator talks about World ..... and it goes blank. Any comments, answers, ... excuses?

  • @levantruonglk
    @levantruonglk 2 місяці тому

    God! Huge engine. First time in my life I saw it

  • @cdpond
    @cdpond Рік тому +58

    For those that don't know, here's a little tidbit of technical trivia associated with large mining trucks shown in the videos. The engines in those vehicles don't actually link via a transmission and drive shaft to the wheels. They're actually diesel engine generators that produce electricity, which in turn powers the motors in each of the wheel hubs. It's those electric motors that actually make the trucks move.
    But I'm still confused about the conversation about the GE "engine" mounted on the wind turbines. That's not an engine, as it doesn't run to create power. It's a generator that produces electricity, not an engine.
    It's gotta be hard producing videos that discuss topics that the video makers don't understand very well. This appears to be one of those types of videos.

    • @larry4111
      @larry4111 Рік тому +2

      Yup. Most large modern ships work the same way, as well. They use diesel engines which actually produce electricity to power the motors for the ship as well as the electricity onboard.

    • @rickmcdonald1557
      @rickmcdonald1557 Рік тому +2

      Yes I was thinking the same thing about the wind generators not engines.

    • @jesserawson898
      @jesserawson898 Рік тому +5

      If the video and the maker of it are so brilliant, why does "click bait" have to be resorted to???.
      Have the balls to change the video title to a more appropriate one.

    • @richardpalleschi4807
      @richardpalleschi4807 Рік тому +4

      Yes & a lot of trains are Diesel electric also.

    • @threynolds2
      @threynolds2 Рік тому

      @@richardpalleschi4807 all trains are unless they are 100% electric and powered by overhead lines or a third rail (or steam powered).

  • @kenkappler9352
    @kenkappler9352 Рік тому +12

    A windmill generator is not an engine. DAH!!

    • @JONNIE8OY
      @JONNIE8OY Рік тому +4

      Yes it is pal.
      An engine is a machine for converting any of various forms of energy into mechanical force and motion. DAH!!

  • @wvsky
    @wvsky 8 місяців тому

    Great video for a change.

  • @gunner162
    @gunner162 Рік тому +2

    Don't know how old this thread is but the current most powerful diesel engine is the MAN B&W 96C, with a bore of 960 mm, a stroke of 2.5 metres, a cylinder displacement of 25.7 metres-cubed for the inline 14-cylinder version, which produces 109,000 hp at 110 rpm. The engine is used in very large containerships (think 'Emma Maersk).

  • @justajo2
    @justajo2 Рік тому +14

    Kind of odd to call a wind turbine generator an engine. You do know the difference, don't you Scary Cherry?

  • @mortimerschnerd3846
    @mortimerschnerd3846 Рік тому +11

    The 5 liter V8 that they described as naturally aspirated had twin turbochargers on it!

    • @johncunningham4820
      @johncunningham4820 Рік тому +2

      No . That was the Initial Koennigsegg Free Valve Engine . Normally Aspirated , making Motorcycle Power per Litre horsepower numbers .
      Later they went to the Turbo Compounded version with 1100 hp . The Veyron Hunter .

  • @lawrencedennerle5303
    @lawrencedennerle5303 Рік тому

    That's a very nice engine, is it a replacement for a cummins 5.9. 😅

  • @einosiirila7093
    @einosiirila7093 Рік тому +1

    Beautiful ❤️ I wish it was a little closer 🥰💯

  • @just1smothie
    @just1smothie Рік тому

    Why do you have two spots muted at 4:56 and 5:16? World War 2. Are we not allowed to say that anymore?
    History offends people, right?

  • @InspiringStories-d8n
    @InspiringStories-d8n 3 місяці тому +1

    If it’s electric, it’s called a motor, not an engine. An engine burns fuel to convert chemical energy into heat through combustion, while an electric motor turns electrical energy into mechanical energy, usually using electromagnetic principles.

  • @tellyonthewall8751
    @tellyonthewall8751 Рік тому

    that pi55 at 2:35 is photo shopped

  • @AgriFatech
    @AgriFatech Рік тому +2

    The engines on the Saturn 5 rocket were not so big but they were certainly powerful !

    • @cornfilledscreamer614
      @cornfilledscreamer614 11 місяців тому

      Pretty sure it's still the most powerful engine ever made, too...

    • @robertchilders8698
      @robertchilders8698 10 місяців тому

      I worked on the Saturn . it was huge!- for being a single engine! not like the way they cluster the engines today to get more power!

  • @gerry4407
    @gerry4407 Рік тому +7

    What is wrong with saying World War II, and Japan in the same sentence?

  • @-WHITE-BOY
    @-WHITE-BOY 6 місяців тому

    Just a curious question why are you blanking out the words War War II during the WASP motor segment

  • @ricardoallen4381
    @ricardoallen4381 Рік тому +3

    Major Campbell!!! He did 2 breaking records! SMART ASS , AND yes he did die on trial 3.
    Prior to last at 140 MPH water and dealy 450 MPH land record and sadly gone.
    Last , (oh wheels) 1997! The blue bird 2 ! Fully steel wheels at 700 MPH record. And still..
    Ty. Missed information page/bud

  • @JurgenStrauss-ow2ge
    @JurgenStrauss-ow2ge Рік тому +1

    To my knowledge , the MAN 14L 96/314 is the biggest piston engine : 14 cylinder in line , bore 96 cm , stroke 314 cm - 118 000 hp .

    • @ufo2go
      @ufo2go Рік тому +1

      lets ask Grok

    • @ufo2go
      @ufo2go Рік тому +1

      The most powerful engine in the world is the GE9X, a high-bypass turbofan jet engine developed by GE Aviation. This mighty beast powers the Boeing 777X and boasts a maximum thrust of up to 330 KN, with a dry weight of 5800 kg. It features fuel burn reduction technology, which not only reduces engine noise but also makes it more efficient.
      Fun fact: The GE9X's fan is a whopping 123 inches in diameter, making it larger than the fuselage of a Boeing 737!
      So, if you're looking to power your next interdimensional spaceship or just want to impress your friends at a dinner party, the GE9X is the engine for you!

  • @stephengile530
    @stephengile530 Рік тому +5

    It also powered the B-29, such as Enola Gay.

  • @christineMaccallum-uo3qx
    @christineMaccallum-uo3qx Рік тому

    More and more Mistry in history and facts 😮

  • @o0o-jd-o0o95
    @o0o-jd-o0o95 Рік тому +11

    I think it's more important that you do not want to be in front of a jet engine. being in the back might not be as big a deal. being in the front is going to make you be in the back really fast and in many pieces

  • @realpatriot5896
    @realpatriot5896 Рік тому

    I used to build skids with mostly big Catapillar diesel and natural gas engines but also some Detroit diesel engines and occasionally a couple of other brands.

  • @robertmethia7080
    @robertmethia7080 6 місяців тому

    why do you mute "world war two" why don't you say it? what is the reason for this?

  • @alexanderbunagan4351
    @alexanderbunagan4351 Рік тому +1

    How about the tunel boring machine for subway train?

    • @andyharman3022
      @andyharman3022 Рік тому

      A tunnel boring machine does not produce power, it consumes it.

  • @tedtw
    @tedtw Рік тому

    Boeing was the first manufacturer to get their 2-engine 757 FAA certified for trans-oceanic flight. FFA requires all commercial aircraft must be able to stay flying with ONE engine shut down. You read it right - the 757 aircraft, fully loaded with cargo and people, stays in level flight with only ONE engine running.
    I was the project manager for Boeing's Jet Engine Test Stand switching system used at their huge Everett, WA plant for testing engines used on every commercial jet aircraft they manufacture. Engines weighed 10,000 pounds and produced 40,000 pounds of thrust each. Each plane has 7 miles of orange flight test wiring used only once - to FAA certify the aircraft to be flight worthy. Then the 7 miles of orange wiring/cables are all ripped out by a work crew..

  • @arteleonard2405
    @arteleonard2405 Рік тому +4

    You forgot the 16 millon horse power Saturn V rocket engine that men to the moon

  • @organbuilder272
    @organbuilder272 Рік тому +1

    Hey, Did you ever go to a physics class?? No! I thought to. Well weight moved over distance in time requires Horse Power. That is a fact, So an electric, Diesel, Coal fired, Oil fired engine (Admittedly depending on efficiency) requires the SAME AMOUNT OF ENERGY to move 1 ton, one mile in one minute. Trains do it more efficiently because of steel rails. Big boy produced 7000 - or more - horse power from one LOCOMOTIVE and there is no diesel engine capable of that today. In fact trains usually have FOUR diesel engines or = 4 times the pollution. The only reason they are popular is maintenance. It still takes TWO guys to run them safely. NOW they are running 1 or 2 more DPU engines in the middle of the trains. Don't dare talk about polluting when it comes to oil fired locomotives. Especially the Big Boys. As far as electrical energy - The grid can not support the load it has today never mind adding electric rail equipment to it. It could have been done before they shut down the nuke stations and the coal fired stations but no more, buddy - live with the truth, not the fantasy. Green is actually very brown.

  • @brianthesnail3815
    @brianthesnail3815 Рік тому +1

    The Caterpillar GCM34 is natural gas powered engine used in power generation that puts out 10 MW. Very useful as near instant backup power. Then depending how high you want to go and how far you want to stretch the definition of 'engine' the General Electric 9HA industrial gas turbine puts out 838 megawatts in combined cycle mode - which is a big city sized power output in one machine.

  • @RoadkillbunnyUK
    @RoadkillbunnyUK Рік тому +7

    Disappointed to not see any rocket engines on this list, off the top of my head I can think of 3 or 4 engines that have jaw dropping power. For example; the F1 that powered the Saturn 5 first stage on the Apollo missions, the RS25 engines that powered the space shuttle and now the new Artemis rocket and you also have rockets like the SpaceX raptor and Blue Origin’s BE4 engine that are also set to break some records!

    • @guitarman4242
      @guitarman4242 7 місяців тому

      agree on the F1. 1.5 million lbs of thrust per engine. 5 mounted on the first stage of the Saturn 5 = 7.5 million lbs of thrust. Truly impressive

  • @terminusest5902
    @terminusest5902 Рік тому

    An atomic bomb test in Australia blew a Centurion tank 10 feet. It became Australia's first nuclear tank. It later saw service in Vietnam. The tank still exists. Centurion 169041 is likely the only tank in history to have been hit by an atomic blast and not only survive, but fight in combat afterwards. This tough old tank was designed to fight the Germans in WWII, but proved itself capable of standing up to a nuclear bomb too.
    This particular Centurion was subjected to a 10 kiloton nuclear bomb from a distance of around 400 meters in the Australian Outback. Test crews returned expecting to find pieces of what was once a Centurion scattered around the site, but they were shocked to the tank in one piece and still functional. Once refueled it drove off.
    Centurion 169041’s unique distinction of living through the test was reflected by its well-earned nickname: The Atomic Tank. Centurions were designed during WW2 to take on German Tiger and other tanks. To make it go they used a version of the Rolls Royce Merlin fighter engine. The war ended before they saw action.

  • @joshuaanderson3599
    @joshuaanderson3599 7 місяців тому

    Thats not cheating. Thats innovation.

  • @89ludeawakening1
    @89ludeawakening1 Рік тому +11

    I honestly wouldn't have put the SHOCKWAVE jet truck on here. The truck had a malfunction and was destroyed in a crash last year. Chris Darnell who was driving it lost his life in the accident.

    • @the_car_guy5915
      @the_car_guy5915 Рік тому +3

      I saw that video, everything was weird about it. It looked like the explosion happened ahead of the truck and the truck spun out into it.

    • @MevRB19
      @MevRB19 10 місяців тому

      Cancel culture at work again.....

  • @briantairea8407
    @briantairea8407 Рік тому +3

    not sure if this fits in. We used to have the bigger the sound speakers the louder you are. Now it's just a small blue tooth speakers

  • @robertm4914
    @robertm4914 7 місяців тому

    Nobody ever show cases the manufacture of one of those wind turbines. I wonder why and how much emissions are produced?

  • @leehauxwell1149
    @leehauxwell1149 Рік тому

    Impressed by all those Emm Double yous produced by that windmill 😂

  • @farmsimaussie1992
    @farmsimaussie1992 Рік тому +9

    Gas for Engines, Electricity for Motors.. There is a big difference...

    • @CadenMoskol
      @CadenMoskol Рік тому +1

      they are synonyms

    • @theknifedude1881
      @theknifedude1881 Рік тому +2

      I agree, electric motors are going to get larger and larger and engines are going to get interesting. Check out the Omega, being developed by Astron Aerospace. Autoline After Hours has an interview with two of the inventors. Small, high revving, and high horsepower.

    • @andyharman3022
      @andyharman3022 Рік тому +1

      General Motors makes engines that run on gasoline and diesel. So does Ford Motor Co. And they also make electric motors. A motor is anything that provides motive power.

    • @kalaharimine
      @kalaharimine Рік тому +1

      Not really.
      The first engines were combustible fuel / steam driven.
      The largest engines now by far are nuclear fueled steam turbines.

  • @hardkoregamer1981
    @hardkoregamer1981 Рік тому +4

    The first Engine in this video reminds me of the engine in the 1927 movie metropolis.

  • @clutchcrgo
    @clutchcrgo Рік тому

    Hey Scary Cherry 🍒, I heard you quantify the engine’s torque output in “pounds-per-foot.” That’s not correct; torque is a force applied to the end of a lever in a direction normal to the radius 🦴 represented by the lever, in this case, centered @ the axis of the engine’s crankshaft.

  • @jamesmoore8558
    @jamesmoore8558 Рік тому +1

    In the Sierra Nevada there is a ski resort that has no outside power they have a building with 6 Caterpiller given generators when you enter the building you can't hear anything but the engines

  • @texaschilli5684
    @texaschilli5684 5 місяців тому

    ماشاءالله تبارك الله ولا حول ولاقوة الابالله فن ❤

  • @a.e.gresel312
    @a.e.gresel312 Рік тому +1

    What about the nucleair powered aircraftcarriers wich run for years on no end? They have a massive propulsion system wich can be seen as the engine of the ship. 2x 194 MegaWatts is a lot of power if you ask me.

  • @8546Ken
    @8546Ken Рік тому +3

    If the Wärtsilä engine is not a Diesel, what is it?

    • @sagebrushbob2321
      @sagebrushbob2321 Рік тому

      Heavy oil powered. Sort of like cold, used motor oil. Must be pre-heated before use. Heavy oil is preferred for these large engines because it has a higher energy output per liter than diesel.

    • @8546Ken
      @8546Ken Рік тому

      @@sagebrushbob2321 OK, but what's the principle? What ignites the heavy oil?

    • @SR-ml4dn
      @SR-ml4dn Рік тому +1

      @@8546Ken it is ignited in the same manner as diesel no difference. The pressure approx. 1000 bar will ignite the fuel when its pump into the cylinder. HFO (Heavy fuel Oil) is preheated and send through a centrifuge and into a fuel plunger ready to push it in the cylinder when the piston has reach TDC.

  • @pavanpavan358
    @pavanpavan358 Рік тому

    You showed thumbnail isn't there in this video😂😂😂

  • @gavrilodjurdjevic6320
    @gavrilodjurdjevic6320 Місяць тому

    get the first baby to rev up to 8000 rpm and you have power for the whole world

  • @jijzer3284
    @jijzer3284 Рік тому +1

    Windmills are not engines that are only waste of money

  • @gsp911
    @gsp911 Рік тому

    An addition to the first to be shown, the 8 cylinder engine weighs over 3.000.000 lbs, that's 1400 ton.
    They start it up every two weeks and let it run for 10 min.

  • @quellenathanar
    @quellenathanar Рік тому

    Did you have to block out the word "war" because of UA-cam?

  • @aeromach2007
    @aeromach2007 Рік тому +5

    Actually #18 powered the B-29 bomber first which did what he said, not the B-50 which was built after the war.

    • @mrvair50
      @mrvair50 Рік тому +1

      The B-29 was powered by 18 cyl. Wright R3350 engines during WW2. And like you said, the B-50 was built after the war using the 27 cyl. Pratt & Whitney R4360 engines.

  • @FriendsofVeteransPark
    @FriendsofVeteransPark Рік тому

    Where is the F-1 engine used in the Saturn V moon rocket with its 1.8 million lbs. of thrust? Its fuel pump alone put out 55,000 horsepower.

  • @BaronVonEvil1
    @BaronVonEvil1 Рік тому +8

    I'm surprised that the Saturn 5 rocket engines did not make the list of most powerful engines.

  • @genespurlin7090
    @genespurlin7090 3 місяці тому

    U forgot the 16-cylinder Cooper Besemer

  • @DavidRankln
    @DavidRankln Рік тому +1

    Electric is not an engine, it's a motor. An engine is a primary fuel consumer.

    • @ellieprice363
      @ellieprice363 Рік тому

      Hmm, electric motors are powered by primary fossil fuels from a distant source. So if that is the definition electric motors are indeed engines. You might say they have extra long extension cords. 🤓🤓

  • @mikerichardson7658
    @mikerichardson7658 Рік тому +2

    That's what powers Hunter's lap top

  • @galewinds7696
    @galewinds7696 Рік тому +1

    I wonder if I could back that up to my Allison trans.

  • @Jimmy-kk8ez
    @Jimmy-kk8ez 6 місяців тому +1

    Why the censorship? Trying to change history? Control the narrative?

  • @gmeast
    @gmeast Рік тому +4

    Why couldn't they say "World War II"??????

  • @helinareinapae3418
    @helinareinapae3418 Рік тому

    All of the engens are super powerful i liked all of the 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

  • @joeerskine3920
    @joeerskine3920 Рік тому +5

    Your accuracy leaves a bit on the table....

  • @bigdaddylawman
    @bigdaddylawman Рік тому

    Yes, an American video which talks about jet engines without mentioning the mighty Rolls-Royce Trent engine which is fitted to many 747s and A380s amongst others.

  • @arslansattar351
    @arslansattar351 9 місяців тому

    It arow complete with transmit able virtual wheel. Capacities.

  • @stephensaltau6481
    @stephensaltau6481 7 місяців тому

    I'll say it for you already..... WW2,WW2,WW2💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥

  • @ulijohnne
    @ulijohnne Рік тому +1

    Torque is measured in lb. ft. not lbs/ft

  • @ColemanCremin
    @ColemanCremin Рік тому

    What is the effect of installing it on a bicycle?

  • @moviesontheweb
    @moviesontheweb Рік тому +3

    Can't tolerate the computer-generated voice overlay.

  • @davelowets
    @davelowets Рік тому

    26:27 The "Brutus" is a 2,862c.i. V-12 aero engine stuffed into a tin can and was the fastest thing around at the time, although it wasn't a pleasant vehicle to drive, and could only make it around a race track a few times before it needed servicing.
    The 547c.i. V-8 in my current street car would lay waste to the Brutus, and I can simply jump into it and comfortable and easily drive it across the country if I wanted to without any issues.
    The Brutus wouldn't make it 5 miles on the street without having major problems, and your face would be black and covered with oil if you attempted to do that.
    Isn't technology great?? 👍

  • @cleetusmacfarland9453
    @cleetusmacfarland9453 Рік тому +2

    😆talking about ge90 with Rolls-Royce Trent video

  • @christineMaccallum-uo3qx
    @christineMaccallum-uo3qx Рік тому

    My o my so much discovery and inventions my mine is over welms 😮😂

  • @sjsz06
    @sjsz06 Рік тому +9

    The Haliade-X 12 MW isn't an engine, it's a wind powered electricity generator...

    • @stephandreischl
      @stephandreischl Рік тому +1

      Saved me for writing it...slight difference..

  • @JesusTorres-qr1gz
    @JesusTorres-qr1gz Рік тому

    Those engines were design to out last all of us.

  • @GG-yr5ix
    @GG-yr5ix Рік тому +3

    B-50 did not fly in WWII, the B-29 did which is what the B-50 came from. B-29 had R-3350s and they were problematic during the war.

  • @flyurway
    @flyurway Рік тому +2

    Title says "Most powerful in the world", I didn't see such a thing. Didn't even see the Wartzilla (ap?), the enormous container ship engine. The one ship engine at the beginning was substantially smaller.

    • @gunner162
      @gunner162 Рік тому

      The engine that is demonstrated in Copenhagen was built in 1930, and was the largest engine THEN! The thing only weighed in at 1400 tons. The largest current ship's diesel engine (as at 2023) weighs in at 2,320 tonnes, and develops 109,000 hp!

    • @flyurway
      @flyurway Рік тому

      @@gunner162 Yes, that would be the Wartzilla that I mentioned in my comment.

  • @danbushilla2865
    @danbushilla2865 Рік тому +2

    Like your channel but the centipede really creeps me out. Remove it please.

  • @jimwells4240
    @jimwells4240 3 місяці тому

    4014 Big Boy is still operating

  • @Niceboy-uw5ni
    @Niceboy-uw5ni 9 місяців тому

    #sweet topic I think it’s for a boat

  • @leosmith848
    @leosmith848 Рік тому +1

    Pretty much everything said about the wind turbine is marketing propaganda

  • @kevinflick61
    @kevinflick61 Рік тому

    The wind turbines considered motors? I thought that they were simply called generators.

  • @JD-ft5zq
    @JD-ft5zq 10 місяців тому

    The Koenigsegg is not naturally aspirated as stated or the pics are a different engine? Those are obviously turbos on both sides

  • @neilmalyon8784
    @neilmalyon8784 10 місяців тому +4

    I stopped watching when you muted the word "war" for the second time. Why?

    • @BLD426
      @BLD426 8 місяців тому

      YT demonetizes vids with unhappy or non left wing content.🤔

  • @taunteratwill1787
    @taunteratwill1787 Рік тому +2

    Clickbait. The Most Powerful Engine In The World?
    SO WHERE IS IT? Not in your video, that's for sure! 😎

  • @robertoconnor456
    @robertoconnor456 Рік тому

    @ 4:35 it looks like the outside engine backfires

  • @paulplus3830
    @paulplus3830 Рік тому +2

    Energy is not created.

  • @dundonrl
    @dundonrl Рік тому +12

    You missed the most powerful "engine" there is.. the GE Harriet 9HA.02, which by itself generates 765,723 hp! When you use it as a combined cycle generator (using the exhaust to boil water that spins a steam turbine) it generates 1,123,777 hp!!

    • @jacksimpson-rogers1069
      @jacksimpson-rogers1069 Рік тому +3

      1,123,777 hp is just about 838 MW (megawatts)
      Palo Verde nuclear power plant has three electric generators each producing 1,400 MW, each driven by a nuclear reactor supplying heat of about twice that power. Industrial steam IS a gas. A steam turbine is a "heat engine" governed by the strict laws of thermodynamics. So reactor power is given as MWth (thermal) and its electricity production as MWe.

    • @wanderschlosser1857
      @wanderschlosser1857 Рік тому +1

      Electric generators are not engines they're the driven equipment. The driver in case of a nuke plant would be a steam turbine. However I wouldn't call that an engine either because it's only the gas (steam) to mechanical power converter not including the steam generator. The above mentioned gas turbine combines the gas generation out of chemical energy and the power conversion part, it can therefore actually be called an engine. I stick with the GE 9HA for being the most powerful engine.

  • @G8GT364CI
    @G8GT364CI Рік тому

    One R-4360 Wasp Major put out 4300 HP with the addition of two turbochargers along with it's supercharger. Wikipedia.

  • @rrommens4527
    @rrommens4527 Рік тому +4

    Beautiful engines, although not the most powerful as the title suggests. And for a windmill its called a generator and MW is MegaWatt.

  • @joshuaanderson3599
    @joshuaanderson3599 7 місяців тому

    Used in ships or cities.