Just imagine what kind of power these 33 liter monsters would be capable of with modern computer control and electronic fuel injection and a more modern design using what we have learned about piston engines in the last 70 years.
If you "improve" the design, would Ruin the Engine, 1500hp, at low rpm, with a cetrifugal compressor And a mecanic fuel injection after the compressor, that runs on low Octane fuel. A 4 Valve Spring less Command, an Engine that can be repaired in the field. Can be made with low tech machines??? Want to improve???
It's actually 35.7 litres. If you compare it to an equation for a modern engine it works out to 1350hp @2800rpm approx NA at sea level 20c with 100% volumetric efficiency and 98RON petrol. Half a bar of boost would make it 2020hp. They only ran about 1.1-1.3 bar absolute I believe. 35700/2 X2800 X0.001225 /1000 X2.2. So they are actually pretty efficient in terms of power to displacement, they don't rev much though compared to a smaller engine. Revolutions are a bigger factor in power. It has a stroke of 160 at 2800rpm, thats like a 61mm stroke at 7300rpm. Thats a lot faster than rotax or lycoming or any other piston engine travels at today. Think of how long a Rotax 914 would last if it was doing 7300rpm at take off.
Отлично, посмотрел фрагменты. Выложите все видео ремонта пожалуйста
pro trick : you can watch series on flixzone. I've been using them for watching loads of movies lately.
@Tatum Nehemiah yea, I have been watching on flixzone for years myself :D
This engine works ?
i guess thats .015 backlash on the cam gear. and i fret over anything over.002
Yes, that is the backlash, which is also necessary to compensate for the thermal expansion.
What you see are 0,15 mm, what you mean are .002", what are 0,051mm. Not as an so great difference.
@@martingotz44 If you watch it, it has more than 0.15mm backlash, more like 1.5mm. Do you recall how much it had BF-109 G14AS?
Just imagine what kind of power these 33 liter monsters would be capable of with modern computer control and electronic fuel injection and a more modern design using what we have learned about piston engines in the last 70 years.
If you "improve" the design, would Ruin the Engine, 1500hp, at low rpm, with a cetrifugal compressor And a mecanic fuel injection after the compressor, that runs on low Octane fuel. A 4 Valve Spring less Command, an Engine that can be repaired in the field. Can be made with low tech machines??? Want to improve???
It's actually 35.7 litres. If you compare it to an equation for a modern engine it works out to 1350hp @2800rpm approx NA at sea level 20c with 100% volumetric efficiency and 98RON petrol. Half a bar of boost would make it 2020hp. They only ran about 1.1-1.3 bar absolute I believe. 35700/2 X2800 X0.001225 /1000 X2.2. So they are actually pretty efficient in terms of power to displacement, they don't rev much though compared to a smaller engine. Revolutions are a bigger factor in power. It has a stroke of 160 at 2800rpm, thats like a 61mm stroke at 7300rpm. Thats a lot faster than rotax or lycoming or any other piston engine travels at today. Think of how long a Rotax 914 would last if it was doing 7300rpm at take off.