Device cleaner: We cleaned 100000000 empty folders. Your PC should now work smoothly as butter. Me: *Dies* EDIT: Wow! Never imagined I would get more than 30 likes.
Masochistic? WDYM??? Have you seen Brainfuck? Or Whitespace? or maybe Piet? Yes, those are programming languages ua-cam.com/video/IcmCvT5whk0/v-deo.html
I think I should encode my bitcoin wallet using folders, put some files in there and put it on my desktop. Nobody will ever guess what is that. Perfect conspiracy!
I mean, but like, in all seriousness tho. Do not keep any private information like keys or passwords in you local machine, regardless of the encription you decide to use. A friend of mine used to keep all of his passwords in rar file with a password thinking that was "protection" and the anxiety that gave me was abnormal
@@sebastiangudino9377 idk local feels better to me than like a subscription service that keeps it for you, just because realistically nobody will bother getting in my pc just to see if i keep passwords while the server of the company is a succulent target
@@davide8354 the problem is your system is reliant on nobody taking a specific interest in you. if you for whatever reason do become the interest of an investigation from the 3 letter boys or of an especially curious someone, your local is ducked and you might as well keep plaintext if you are confident enough that nobody will try to read your local. a saying i once heard: dance like nobody is watching; encrypt like everyone is (no matter how unlikely)
When Windows looks at folder properties, the size property just shows the size of the contents inside of the folder. Folders still take up space in your computer, but the size cost is extremely low
@@felix-gena6595 Some Linux file manager, can't remember which, showed a size of a folder to be 4Kb, can't say how accurate that is, but if it's true, you're absolutely right about a C binary taking up less space.
folders also use up inodes which your partition has a limited number of you can have 100GB of space left but if you've used up all your inodes you can't store anything more
@@TomDufall unless you already have a "file" that will have constant size describing inodes upto some ammount, in which case any folder you create will do net 0 and is size 0. Which is the case
@@Reth_Hard oh no it really does take up space on a HDD. and not just "sometimes" in order for your computer to know a folder is there it needs information which takes up space. each folder also stores the date it was created. which takes up space. create a few million empty folders and you lose 10 GB of HDD space. everything that exists on your PCs HDD takes up space. there is no free data. you simply cant create an infinite amount of empty folders. I dare you to try using a CMD command that creates empty folders on an infinite loop.
Create a million folders nested any old way, right click, properties. ZERO. BYTES. No, really, they do take up space in the file table. Depending on your filesystem, you may or may not get this space back after you delete them. Notably NTFS will expand its MFT as needed, and as you delete stuff it marks the entries from them as free and will reuse them for new files and folders. But it will NEVER shrink the MFT! So you could quite literally fill your disk up with folders, delete all of them and still have a full disk. Formatting it is the only way back out of that.
@@darkshadowsx5949 No you don't understand, I know computers very well! Empty folders doesn't take any space on your hard drive, even if you rename it. If you don't believe me, just look for yourself, right-click an empty folders and look the properties... 0 bytes!
Indeed, each folder takes some amount of space. As every folder is a node in the filesystem that contains metadata information like the name, access times, etc., this information is stored on disk. Where and how many bytes this takes depends on the filesystem.
Asking the real questions here Edit: looks like no to both. It can read from stdin and print, so maybe you could make a folders interpreter that runs like `find | Folders /interpreter` and a compiler from C like `Folders /interpreter < myprogram.c | xargs mkdir`
Since a folder structure is just a DAG and a python dict is just a DAG, you could use your interpreter to run on a dictionary in python. Which could be pretty cool
you had me at folders you lost me at folders Jokes aside, this takes the term `no-code` to the next level Jokes aside, this is so cool. Thanks for sharing :)
Folders actually take a lot space (by a lot I mean lot more than zero, every folder name and its location must be written in the filesystem), their sizes reported as zero is just an error. In normal use their count is so relatively small that their size is next to negligible compared to the data size, so the error is so small there's no need to correct for it. However, on WINDOWS, you have it calculated. Explorer shows "Size on disk" value that is the real size, including folders and file entries non-zero sizes. Here you have something extremely wasteful. Using a lot of bytes to convey bits. There's also nothing special about it. If there's anything having a property, you can just use it to represent 0 or 1. And that's enough. That's how you build computers and computer games in computer games. It's done over and over again. It would be fun however, if someone used like... partitions instead of folders ;) In the next episode - let's use whole PCs as logic gates ;)
In Linux ext4, an empty directory could take 4096 bytes, if file system block size is 4kb. Long story follows, so people can correct me: In a file system like ext4, there is a fixed size table with fixed size records (
@@cliffmathew It seems like it works similarly on many different file systems. I mean - how else could you find an entry on a medium? There must be at least the name and address part, but in most of the file systems also other metadata like timestamps, permissions, flags and such. In most cases the data are also cached, but there is one exception - NVME. I think the metadata is still cached for them, but this actually gives a negative performance benefit. At least that's what I read pretty recently somewhere.
@@cliffmathew I was about to say that at least for all the leaf nodes (empty folders) they could all just be a hard link to the same i-node to save space... but wait a minute: You no longer can create multiple hard-links to a folder in ext* systems! (The . and .. are exceptions.)
it's not possible because the instruction set does not support graphics stuff. unless some mad dude actually extends this to support opengl or directx lol. would take an awful lot of time though
@@gamedevprod6276 there's only two things needed to make something happen... 1: someone saying it's impossible. 2: someone "mad" enough to prove them wrong.
I'm a little bit disappointed that the language doesn't deal with state by creating and deleting folders in a folder called heap and a folder called stack. Imagine if you could watch the execution play out just by having your file explorer open!
@@meflea3675 I think this is the future of programming. Its very easy compared to Python. I am waiting for others to write some nice Folder libraries that I can copy and use it for a trillion dollar project. :)
This reminds me of how I used to password lock my images from my parents by hiding them in folders. For example if the password was "cat", I'd have folders A-Z then A-Z inside each one and A-Z within each one of those. I'd then hide the images inside of a "T" folder inside of a "A" folder inside of a "C" folder.
I contest that just because there are no files, that it is a 0-byte program. That extensive use of nested folders clearly consumes space in the allocation table.
It sounds so simple yet so complicated at the same time and also being so time consuming literally a string of code that you could make in python in about 1 minute would take like 20 minutes in this language if you can even call it a language at all
Stick an empty file inside of it like how in the video, there were files called .empty. There might also be a way to force git to add empty folders, but at least with empty files inside of them, you don't have to worry about git not pushing them.
@@nou6990 You do, but antiviruses dont see compilers as malware. So if you trick someone into downloading it and then downloading a game, you can hide the folders inside the game files and most people wont go in to see whats there.
Dude, he just find a way to create 0kb programs. I can't believe it, you can now send your code instantly without taking any space on your PC ! Can't wait to see games programmed with this. BOOM, call of duty goes from 200GB to 0kb in an instant, just like that !
@@TryallAllombria they're right the names of the folders also contain bytes, and these bytes must be stored somewhere on your drive and also the structure requires metadata and stuff on NTFS, this sums up to 1 KiB _per folder_
I have a better idea of a implementation. What about just creating folders in a formatted NTFS hard drive, and then reading the MFT as executable, as an x86 executable that really works, its probably possible.
I find this a bit convoluted as a programming paradigm, but it's an interesting concept. Can the folders' names actually represent something? Lots of information storage is wasted if just the *count* of folders matters. Plus it's a bit confusing if "New Folder" is seen everywhere. The eye gets tired that way (and distracted), and debugging kind of becomes impossible. Have my Thumb-Up though!
I think the whole point is that the folder names don't represent something, it is just controlled entirely by folders. If the folder names mattered then in a way that would be writing code. Though he did kinda solve the "New Folder" problem in his Fibonacci program, using the folder names as comments basically.
I have no clue how to code, I have never even coded a line of code ever, yes I am drunk, yes I am fascinated by this content, the guy coded something with folders
Oh, my word. This is such a disgusting programming language, yet I'm impressed by the sheer genius of the guy who thought this up. Imagine having to use this at work...
Folders do essentially carry data if empty like their location/name so they're not exactly 0 bytes per say excluding the fact of the explorer saying so.
1:50 How can people believe that folder structure can use zero bytes of memory. They have names, and locations (whoose subfolder it is). They just simply dont use casual disc space, but space pre-set for folder allocation system. If you want to experience that - you should try to create infinite number of folders, by recursvie function - it's simply impossible.
calling the programs 0 byte would be wrong, they do take up bytes inorder to store their names, Its just when you look at a folders properties it only shows the size of files
Oo that’d be cool, right now it never actually stats the folders for metadata but there’s a lot of implicit information that could be used like you said
Hey y’all tysm for all the views! Sorry for calling C# windows lang, it can run anywhere using dotnet core. Forgive me billionaire billy. Cheers
i was about to comment about how we can run c# anywhere but you beat me to it
dotnet with mono*
Well if he had used Net Framework,its not wrong to say this project was windows only
@@ZeroSleap dotnet core runs dotnet framework code actually
@@opalb9006 Dotnet without mono can be run on all platforms
Device cleaner: We cleaned 100000000 empty folders. Your PC should now work smoothly as butter.
Me: *Dies*
EDIT:
Wow! Never imagined I would get more than 30 likes.
O shit you're right
When ccleaner deletes your 7 year old folder still named "New Folder"
RIP man, you will always be remembered
@@windestruct old folder
I imagine it happening after trying this language for several hours and the cleaner did his job without permission LOL
Basically a masochistic para-programming language for people who hate programming, but know it by heart.
I was about to reply, someone came up with a program representation that's actually worse than a flow diagram....
Masochistic? WDYM??? Have you seen Brainfuck? Or Whitespace? or maybe Piet? Yes, those are programming languages ua-cam.com/video/IcmCvT5whk0/v-deo.html
I think I should encode my bitcoin wallet using folders, put some files in there and put it on my desktop. Nobody will ever guess what is that. Perfect conspiracy!
300 IQ play
Well, now we know.
I mean, but like, in all seriousness tho. Do not keep any private information like keys or passwords in you local machine, regardless of the encription you decide to use.
A friend of mine used to keep all of his passwords in rar file with a password thinking that was "protection" and the anxiety that gave me was abnormal
@@sebastiangudino9377 idk local feels better to me than like a subscription service that keeps it for you, just because realistically nobody will bother getting in my pc just to see if i keep passwords while the server of the company is a succulent target
@@davide8354 the problem is your system is reliant on nobody taking a specific interest in you. if you for whatever reason do become the interest of an investigation from the 3 letter boys or of an especially curious someone, your local is ducked and you might as well keep plaintext if you are confident enough that nobody will try to read your local. a saying i once heard: dance like nobody is watching; encrypt like everyone is (no matter how unlikely)
Fun fact: In linux its actually called "Files"
@@p_square your mom
@@p_square i asked
@@p_square i asked
I asked
@@p_square i asked
When Windows looks at folder properties, the size property just shows the size of the contents inside of the folder. Folders still take up space in your computer, but the size cost is extremely low
I am pretty sure that a normal C binary would use less space tho.
@@felix-gena6595 Some Linux file manager, can't remember which, showed a size of a folder to be 4Kb, can't say how accurate that is, but if it's true, you're absolutely right about a C binary taking up less space.
folders also use up inodes which your partition has a limited number of
you can have 100GB of space left but if you've used up all your inodes you can't store anything more
I assumed that was meant to be a joke - it would be impossible for them to take up zero space.
@@TomDufall unless you already have a "file" that will have constant size describing inodes upto some ammount, in which case any folder you create will do net 0 and is size 0. Which is the case
This dude: "Folders take up 0 Bytes!"
The file table: "Am I a joke to you?"
Empty folders doesn't take ANY space on your HDD, except, MAYBE, sometimes in the file table...
@@Reth_Hard oh no it really does take up space on a HDD. and not just "sometimes"
in order for your computer to know a folder is there it needs information which takes up space.
each folder also stores the date it was created. which takes up space. create a few million empty folders and you lose 10 GB of HDD space.
everything that exists on your PCs HDD takes up space. there is no free data.
you simply cant create an infinite amount of empty folders. I dare you to try using a CMD command that creates empty folders on an infinite loop.
Create a million folders nested any old way, right click, properties. ZERO. BYTES.
No, really, they do take up space in the file table. Depending on your filesystem, you may or may not get this space back after you delete them. Notably NTFS will expand its MFT as needed, and as you delete stuff it marks the entries from them as free and will reuse them for new files and folders. But it will NEVER shrink the MFT! So you could quite literally fill your disk up with folders, delete all of them and still have a full disk. Formatting it is the only way back out of that.
@@darkshadowsx5949
No you don't understand, I know computers very well! Empty folders doesn't take any space on your hard drive, even if you rename it.
If you don't believe me, just look for yourself, right-click an empty folders and look the properties... 0 bytes!
@@Reth_Hard zero bytes of CONTENT. Not the actual space it takes.
This is so ineffecient. I love it!
In before Folders LLVM front-end.
Oh pls no.
ps. and embedded Folders.
Prime example for multiply and surrender.
This was a very comprehensive tutorial! This is actually such a cool idea, but there's no way this ACTUALLY take 0 bytes of storage, right?
Glad to have you back on the channel, mr COOL
ua-cam.com/video/kiTTAbeqQKY/v-deo.html
Indeed, each folder takes some amount of space. As every folder is a node in the filesystem that contains metadata information like the name, access times, etc., this information is stored on disk. Where and how many bytes this takes depends on the filesystem.
@@red13emerald so its rather the most light weight programming language ever than a weightless programming language
@@redoverflow Dude the name of the folder is also metadata, this should scale exponentially. This is NOT lightweight
World's hardest programming challenge ever:
Create a virtual reality game in this Folders programming language
You'd first have to make a folder folders compiler
i think is harder in malborge
Make it multiplayer and add in-game purchases
@@redpepper74 Then market useless cosmetics to 6 year olds.
Try brainfuck
Does it do file I/O? Does it create folders? Could you make a Folders compiler in Folders?
Asking the real questions here
Edit: looks like no to both. It can read from stdin and print, so maybe you could make a folders interpreter that runs like `find | Folders /interpreter` and a compiler from C like `Folders /interpreter < myprogram.c | xargs mkdir`
What sort of a meta question is this?😂
yea i want to wont now how too do thisso i cn h4x my schhol witout letting my get cout. becos a rat lik dis is posibly.
@@kopuz.co.uk. wat
@@kopuz.co.uk. What's the difference between Kali and Python?
I love that the folder names in the Fibonacci example are just the commands they do. It's better than most API documentation.
Since a folder structure is just a DAG and a python dict is just a DAG, you could use your interpreter to run on a dictionary in python. Which could be pretty cool
I don't know how and why I found this channel, but I am happy that I found it. Amazing content!
Right!?
you had me at folders
you lost me at folders
Jokes aside, this takes the term `no-code` to the next level
Jokes aside, this is so cool. Thanks for sharing :)
Jokes aside please
Jokes aside water is wet
Folders actually take a lot space (by a lot I mean lot more than zero, every folder name and its location must be written in the filesystem), their sizes reported as zero is just an error. In normal use their count is so relatively small that their size is next to negligible compared to the data size, so the error is so small there's no need to correct for it. However, on WINDOWS, you have it calculated. Explorer shows "Size on disk" value that is the real size, including folders and file entries non-zero sizes. Here you have something extremely wasteful. Using a lot of bytes to convey bits. There's also nothing special about it. If there's anything having a property, you can just use it to represent 0 or 1. And that's enough. That's how you build computers and computer games in computer games. It's done over and over again. It would be fun however, if someone used like... partitions instead of folders ;) In the next episode - let's use whole PCs as logic gates ;)
In Linux ext4, an empty directory could take 4096 bytes, if file system block size is 4kb. Long story follows, so people can correct me: In a file system like ext4, there is a fixed size table with fixed size records (
@@cliffmathew It seems like it works similarly on many different file systems. I mean - how else could you find an entry on a medium? There must be at least the name and address part, but in most of the file systems also other metadata like timestamps, permissions, flags and such. In most cases the data are also cached, but there is one exception - NVME. I think the metadata is still cached for them, but this actually gives a negative performance benefit. At least that's what I read pretty recently somewhere.
@@cliffmathew I was about to say that at least for all the leaf nodes (empty folders) they could all just be a hard link to the same i-node to save space... but wait a minute: You no longer can create multiple hard-links to a folder in ext* systems! (The . and .. are exceptions.)
Imagine making a game engine out of this that actually beats stuff like unreal or unity in features.
You could hide assets IN your code!
@@jakubrejzekjunior7349 it would take you a literal eternity to find most things if you lost em tho
Then again no one else can find them
it's not possible because the instruction set does not support graphics stuff. unless some mad dude actually extends this to support opengl or directx lol. would take an awful lot of time though
@@gamedevprod6276 there's only two things needed to make something happen...
1: someone saying it's impossible.
2: someone "mad" enough to prove them wrong.
@@newbiegaming6090 and we already have one
"Wait, it's all folders?"
"Always has been"
All programs should be written in Folders. That way, they all take up no space.
Absolutely, a FolderOS of 0 bytes 👌 The goated esolangs channel 🙏 I am honoured
@@K0P goated and debloated
This is the “reality” part of No Code: expectation vs reality
Start writing nocode!
It would be easy to write a python to folders converter/compiler. That way it would be really easy and fast to make your folders.
Probably for a subset of python at least.
Same with any language, but that's not as fun.
Awesome, now I need my own language that will transpile the code to folders.
I was just thinking about this LOL
The best part is that you can have a comment in any format, just make a video explaining that line of code and put it in that folder
I'm a little bit disappointed that the language doesn't deal with state by creating and deleting folders in a folder called heap and a folder called stack. Imagine if you could watch the execution play out just by having your file explorer open!
Loving the new language series!
🙏🙏
I would like to use this language to do AI. Can we have a VS code plugin for the "folder highlighting and auto folder creation" ?
Y tho?
@@meflea3675 I think this is the future of programming. Its very easy compared to Python. I am waiting for others to write some nice Folder libraries that I can copy and use it for a trillion dollar project. :)
@@azr_sd oh, I missed the joke lol
@@meflea3675 😁😁 have a great day!
Wot if u made an ai with folders that creates folders itself and writes folders code
This reminds me of how I used to password lock my images from my parents by hiding them in folders. For example if the password was "cat", I'd have folders A-Z then A-Z inside each one and A-Z within each one of those. I'd then hide the images inside of a "T" folder inside of a "A" folder inside of a "C" folder.
Nice - a file based radix tree, that’s pretty cool!
Properties destroys this scheme...
Unless...
then folder search came along and ruined it?
Watching this at 3am. Seriously reconsidering every decision i made in my life to end up in this awkward situation.
I'm watching at 9am and haven't slept yet. Help
thanks! after this awesome tutorial now i can build the next google, facebook, etc.
Thank you so much UA-cam for recommending this at 10PM. This just made my evening
I contest that just because there are no files, that it is a 0-byte program. That extensive use of nested folders clearly consumes space in the allocation table.
It sounds so simple yet so complicated at the same time and also being so time consuming literally a string of code that you could make in python in about 1 minute would take like 20 minutes in this language if you can even call it a language at all
You were so preoccupied with whether or not you could, you didn't stop to think if you should
2:08 the days of C# being exclusive to windows are gone, .NET Core and .NET 5+ are here
thank god
What IDE do you use?
mkdir in bash
Oh boy
This is going to blow up after an year
very intresting format, and you are the type of guy to record these videos, I see great potential in your channel :)
how do I put my folder program on git?
Wrap it in tar archive (without compression)
Stick an empty file inside of it like how in the video, there were files called .empty. There might also be a way to force git to add empty folders, but at least with empty files inside of them, you don't have to worry about git not pushing them.
Do I sense a Jan Misali subscriber? 👀
The Algorithm brought me here, but I'm glad it did. Keep up the good work :)
glad to see i wasn't the only one who saw that ranking screen and immediately thought of jan Misali lol
This video is insane, i literally lost my mind, very good and informative video. Merry christmass
This dude sounds like he is having an inspirational speech while dying inside
What type of malware can you create with this? We all thought that folders were harmless until now.
but don’t you need a compiler or something to run it?
@@nou6990 You do, but antiviruses dont see compilers as malware. So if you trick someone into downloading it and then downloading a game, you can hide the folders inside the game files and most people wont go in to see whats there.
Kind of scary. But also seems like it would take a LOT of folders.
@@OchiiDinUmbraa IIRC Windows defender saw the Intel C compiler as malware
@@redking36 yeah, but a computer program can generate the folders.
0:35 what is this?
"if there's a will, there's a way"
-William Hazlitt
Dude, he just find a way to create 0kb programs. I can't believe it, you can now send your code instantly without taking any space on your PC ! Can't wait to see games programmed with this. BOOM, call of duty goes from 200GB to 0kb in an instant, just like that !
I'm gonna build a blockchain out of it 🚀🚀🚀
it's not actually 0 bytes tho
@@atar4xis ...
@@TryallAllombria they're right
the names of the folders also contain bytes, and these bytes must be stored somewhere on your drive
and also the structure requires metadata and stuff
on NTFS, this sums up to 1 KiB _per folder_
@@fghsgh ...
I have a better idea of a implementation. What about just creating folders in a formatted NTFS hard drive, and then reading the MFT as executable, as an x86 executable that really works, its probably possible.
- Which IDE do you use?
- Windows File Explorer
The intro was truly something else.
but why
wait - can you emulate procedures by symlinking to folders?
Recursion using symlink would be cool
Genius idea tbh
It still takes up space somewhere in the filesystem. Nothing's for free.
I find this a bit convoluted as a programming paradigm, but it's an interesting concept. Can the folders' names actually represent something? Lots of information storage is wasted if just the *count* of folders matters. Plus it's a bit confusing if "New Folder" is seen everywhere. The eye gets tired that way (and distracted), and debugging kind of becomes impossible. Have my Thumb-Up though!
I think the whole point is that the folder names don't represent something, it is just controlled entirely by folders. If the folder names mattered then in a way that would be writing code. Though he did kinda solve the "New Folder" problem in his Fibonacci program, using the folder names as comments basically.
I’d probably set up the first level of my folders like “cmd 010 let” “cmd 020 while” “cmd 025 if” “cmd 030 print”
folder names are basically code comments.
Finaly a solution to force programmers to document their code
but can you make programming languages using only emojis?
Emojilang already exists.
A whole new way of making "code blocks"
I don't know if it was publically released yet. Out of secret sources i know that META wants to use Folders for its future projects
Love the fact that he is recording this at 1 AM in the morning haha
It's not really zero bytes, it just shows it that way. directory entries do take up space even though the space is not counted.
Ah, but it is the best kind, it uses no space according to "a" metric. Therefore it is still technically correct.
I love how that keyboard sounds!
I have no clue how to code, I have never even coded a line of code ever, yes I am drunk, yes I am fascinated by this content, the guy coded something with folders
i have never been so proud of humanity and disappointed in humanity at the same time
1:55 "zero-byte programs"
false, obviously.
What is that fancy program used at 0:36?
The typing sounds are rather soothing.
0:31 which kind of representation can anyone tell?
What program is that web thing at 0:30?
Finally someone made gamemaker file system simulator!
a macro feature would be great for automated folder generation
Oh, my word. This is such a disgusting programming language, yet I'm impressed by the sheer genius of the guy who thought this up. Imagine having to use this at work...
How many folders do you need to get a mic that isn't attached to the keyboard?
Now just write a python interpreter in Folders, and run your folders interpreter with it.
Folders do essentially carry data if empty like their location/name so they're not exactly 0 bytes per say excluding the fact of the explorer saying so.
i came here for some weird shit and it was delivered
Ask and Ye shall receive
Wild concept: an operating system whose directory tree folder structure is the source code, thus making the os it's own source code
It’s not zero bytes. It takes up the meta sector of the hard drive.
Ok, why don't you make a coverter that convert written code to folders
I hate hand coding, but this makes me appreciate traditional syntax
1:50 How can people believe that folder structure can use zero bytes of memory. They have names, and locations (whoose subfolder it is). They just simply dont use casual disc space, but space pre-set for folder allocation system. If you want to experience that - you should try to create infinite number of folders, by recursvie function - it's simply impossible.
u r potato
@@lunafoxfire You are banana.
How is it possible that nested empty folders are 0 bytes...?
I'm gonna start doing coding interviews in folders
What about making a transpiler for another into Folders?
this feels like that xkcd about simulating a universe with unlimited rocks in an infinite desert
How can I commit my code to Git?
Nobody caught the Mr Robot like intro? Loved it!
do Tailor next please /s
-Tailor creator
In all seriousness, this is a great video! Keep doing what you're doing!
Thank you 🙏 much love
the pandoc is glitching
calling the programs 0 byte would be wrong, they do take up bytes inorder to store their names, Its just when you look at a folders properties it only shows the size of files
C# runs on many machines, right?
Not just windows
somebody needs to make a compiler for this.
though it says the folders take up no space. they actually do.
the metadata has to be written somewhere after all :)
whats the program at 0:30
Obsidian apparently
This gave me an idea, have you considered using access permissions as a way to morph the code without changing the directories in it?
Another one is using hardlinks to change the code execution path.
Oo that’d be cool, right now it never actually stats the folders for metadata but there’s a lot of implicit information that could be used like you said
This needs to continue
I assume there’s a compiler so you’re not going mad hand placing and debugging folders
Windows has a limit for folder depth, is that a problem?
I can't. I just double clicked the video to watch it.
"Hello world is a bit long"
Your channel is a blessing
This satisfies something deep within my soul. 😌
Whoever wrote this I wish to hire them
thas node js and all the packages isnt it?
node_modules
node_modules
I love the sound of your keyboard. What switches do you use?
no particular switches it's actually a non-mechanical old school keyboard 😅