Istina, mada je uživo šištanje izraženije nego ovde, čini mi se... A i brat mu #70 možda ne dimi toliko, ali šišti toliko da je to nerealno, a još uz to ispušta neki čudan, dubok zvuk, ne znam odakle...
Well, the axle and the gearbox and the retarder really still are great, but sadly, the engine hisses strongly now, and I think that it's less audible on this recording, than it is in reality.
I've checked some of you recordings, they're pretty good. Sometimes, sounds of some practicular buses become almost unrecognizable. It's best not to record them in that case. For example, the sound of Subotica's Ikarus Zemun IK 111 #64 (1991-2019) has changed completely in the last year or two of its service. There is a video of it on YT from that period. But its real sound is actually shown through my 1987-1991 Ikarus Zemun IK 111/161 sound recreation. But, when it comes to newer Ikarbus models, despite the poor maintenance, through these recordings I can conclude that buses in Subotica still sound good. Compare the IK 201's or the IK 103 #68 to the same buses in Belgrade (I think they're recently withdrawn there) and you'll understand me. PS What engine and gearbox do Sofia's SG 262's have ? They sound similar to an Ikarbus IK 201.
They're equipped with MAN D 2866 LUH 22 and voith D854.3 gearbox. Prototype 2139 was interesting had its gearbox changed with voith d863.3 from a Chavdar bus, probably model 141, but when this peculiarity broke this is very hard to fix, therefore scrapped. Others had their engines swapped among the same buses.
@@lemon23 So, that means they're using the same engine and almost the same gearbox as the 1998-2001 Ikarbus IK 201 (which actually used the Voith D863.3). So, the Raba axle is the only bigger difference on the Ikarbus. Thanks for the info.
Danas sam ga video,uzasno puno dima izbacuje,uzasnut sam njegovim stanjem,tacno se vidi razlika u snimcima,sve gore i gore
Istina, mada je uživo šištanje izraženije nego ovde, čini mi se...
A i brat mu #70 možda ne dimi toliko, ali šišti toliko da je to nerealno, a još uz to ispušta neki čudan, dubok zvuk, ne znam odakle...
It's still a 10/10 by sound :D
Well, the axle and the gearbox and the retarder really still are great, but sadly, the engine hisses strongly now, and I think that it's less audible on this recording, than it is in reality.
I am not recording MAN SG 262 and MB O345 Conecto in my city anymore for similar reasons
I've checked some of you recordings, they're pretty good. Sometimes, sounds of some practicular buses become almost unrecognizable. It's best not to record them in that case. For example, the sound of Subotica's Ikarus Zemun IK 111 #64 (1991-2019) has changed completely in the last year or two of its service. There is a video of it on YT from that period. But its real sound is actually shown through my 1987-1991 Ikarus Zemun IK 111/161 sound recreation.
But, when it comes to newer Ikarbus models, despite the poor maintenance, through these recordings I can conclude that buses in Subotica still sound good. Compare the IK 201's or the IK 103 #68 to the same buses in Belgrade (I think they're recently withdrawn there) and you'll understand me.
PS What engine and gearbox do Sofia's SG 262's have ? They sound similar to an Ikarbus IK 201.
They're equipped with MAN D 2866 LUH 22 and voith D854.3 gearbox. Prototype 2139 was interesting had its gearbox changed with voith d863.3 from a Chavdar bus, probably model 141, but when this peculiarity broke this is very hard to fix, therefore scrapped. Others had their engines swapped among the same buses.
@@lemon23 So, that means they're using the same engine and almost the same gearbox as the 1998-2001 Ikarbus IK 201 (which actually used the Voith D863.3). So, the Raba axle is the only bigger difference on the Ikarbus.
Thanks for the info.
Odlično 👍
Hvala. 👍