Can You Tell The Difference? Prove It!
Вставка
- Опубліковано 30 вер 2024
- Photographs shot on film and digital sprinkled through the video, watch until the end and see if you get them all right!
DEHANCER
www.dehancer.com
10% DISCOUNT CODE: HUNTERHART
📸Instagram: / hunterhartphoto
$20 off Pixieset (the best online gallery hosting software): pixieset.com/r...
🎞️MY PRESETS: www.thehunterh...
🎒Brevite Jumper Bag www.brevite.co...
📸Camera Bag Contents: amzn.to/3GGM9K5
🖼️MPix $10 off printing! - tinyurl.com/3p...
Camera Strap 💼 Remrock Goods: / remrock.goodspresets used on my images:
My Portfolio:
www.thehunterh...
Digital will never be film as the way they make pictures is different. Film has highlight roll off while digital has highlight blow out. Film has layers with primary colors and can detect finer color differences. Digital has a color filter array where every pixel has a single color and interpolation algorithms are used to calculate colors. In certain circumstances they can produce similar results while in others there will be obvious differences.
Thanks for watching
I do love finding an undeveloped roll in the fridge and seeing those moments again 8 months later, whether the photos are good or bad. I have found slowing down with manual lenses on digital has been a nice change though, even if it isn't the same film shooting process all the way through. I've been wanting to give Dehancer a try but seems a little pricey for what it is.
I think manual focus lenses definitely lend a nostalgic take on digital, I shoot this way a lot as well. I like your take on keeping the film for a while before developing, good idea. It is pretty pricey but I think for some it would be worth it. I can’t thank you enough for taking the time to watch the video and comment 🤙🏼
Slowing you down and concentrate on image got to be good ❤ onthat bessa do run full neck strap or hand strap because those lugs just bought a bessa r3a
@@raygeary1698 thanks for watching
When consumer digital DSLR cameras were introduced, I also had a Canon Elan II. Would shoot film and digital, and have wet chemistry (chromogenic) prints made for each. The limitations of the c-prints made the results more similar than not. Digital prints looked a little more contrasty and film did a better job with shadow and highlight detail.
Must say - your edits are great. You may think the differences are obvious, but, that is probably because you spent the time to work on them. I couldn't determine which was which and be 100% sure.
As far as digital and film goes I think the best way to tell a difference would be a print but in this world not everyone is printing. I really appreciate your honesty and thank you for watching the whole video 🙏🏼
Great video mate! Couldn’t agree more, it’s not just the results, it’s the process of film that appeals! But maaaan the price hurts
Man I know, it’s pretty wild. Thanks for watching buddy
Advise for film photogaphy by McKinnon ? Really?
I personally don’t take advice from him but yeah a lot of people do.
Is that all you got out of the entire video 😂
Ive been so tempted to get a film camera but after looking into the cost of ownership developing and scanning I feel like I could just get a Leica Q2 and be spending less in the long run but still getting a cool second camera. I will admit my mirrorless setup is boring despite being super expensive.
Have you seen my Leica Q video by chance? It may persuade you even more.
ua-cam.com/video/SXbRIBqblK0/v-deo.htmlsi=fGVH7tp0gKNkb1rF
You can delevope your self with a Paterson tank and monobath b /w get started
@@raygeary1698 Just bought a Nikon f3 from a neighbor so I may look into this!
When you're specifically looking to find the differences it's definitely very obvious I got them all right. There is something to be said about how similar the results can get - Also sometimes I don't want to go on my computer and do a bunch of editing to get them to a place I want and that's where I find film really shines. Yeah you're editing it still but it requires way less work to get it to a good spot that I like.
I completely agree, it is a lot of work to make it look that. You can just get the film stock ya want and go for it! I am unbiased, love both and think they have their places in my work flow. I bring my film camera when I don't want photography to get in my way, if that makes sense. Thanks so much for watching the video, your perspective and for taking the time to comment. Cheers
Great video. I am from the film era , shot digital the last 23 years , before dragging out my old film gear. Yes , film is expensive, but I know how to develop and scan my B&W film. I also , had to learn how to develop color film, which was a lot easier than B&W. That dramatly lowered the over all cost of shooting film. Now I shoot film mostly, and digital as a backup, if I can't return to a important subject, which is rare . Reason, it slows you done . From the film days, "get it right in the camera" will save money down the line. KB
Thanks for watching and thanks for your perspective 🙏🏼 great info
I actually was able to tell
That’s great, I thought it was pretty easy as well. Most do
I grew up with film but was not able to see the difference. 😬 (This is because I’m not an expert and because your post processing of the digital photos was extremely well done.) Maybe you could make a follow-up video and explain the differences for those of us who failed the test... ? 😉
I can't tell much of a difference either honestly. That is kind of the whole point of the video, why has film become so popular and expensive if you can't tell the difference? Is it just cool to say "I shoot film" or is there a reason it is sought after? I have clients that want film photographs from me just because it is hip but tbh they would never know the difference. People aren't printing anything anymore and I think that is where the difference really lies. Thanks for watching
@@hunterhart1 Not sure if there is a reason sought after... 🤷♂️ Funny enough, film is so expensive and yet social media is full of film photos which I find totally boring and which seem to have no other merit than being shot on film (as if using film alone would make a great photo).
Btw, I agree that it possibly makes a much bigger difference when printing the photos. Thank you for your reply (and honest view on the difference between film and digital)!
@@jorghahn2903 yeah it’s just trendy now, I do love shooting film however. Slows me down and I don’t have to worry about editing, very nice!
@@hunterhart1 Same here. Much less than digital but I like the experience a lot. And it reminds me of the times when there was no digital yet.
You don't further edit your film photos?
@@jorghahn2903 not unless I really have to, so 9/10 times no
The way I shoot, analog-photography is 1/5th the cost because the cameras are a whole lot cheaper, last longer, I don't need editing software, digital cards, external hard drives, etc.
4 days to receive my film scans from day of posting to lab.
There are photos I'll take with a film camera that I wouldn't even consider with digital and vice versa. No idea why but process might be it.
Ya know, I run into that sometimes. I wasn’t consciously doing this for a video they’d all look a lot different. Thanks for watching as always 🙏🏼
@@hunterhart1 always learning something from these
Totally agree! Just bought a ZV-E10 and ready for my vlog life. What filter do you usually use? I have only black mist from Kase.
I don’t really use filters very often
Great points Hunter! I completely agree and, for me, film made me fall in love with the process as much as the results. The seamless shooting experience between my M6 and M10R makes it even more intuitive. With the price of film going up though, I take it as an extra reminder to make my shot count! Take car me friend and keep on shooting (film)🤘🏻 Cheers!
Thanks for watching Fred. Glad to hear you’re still enjoying the both of them.
The Digis are usually sharper, That has been my experience. I shoot Film because it reminds me of my Dad's old pics from the 70s. Prices have sadly gone nuts with film, too bad I would shoot alot more if they were cheaper, specially 120.
120 is fun to shoot on, I agree. I’m glad you can get a nostalgic feeling shooting film to see a bit of your dad in them, that’s special. Thanks so much for watching
I was a medium format film wedding photographer for a few years. I've also owned one sort of digital camera or another for a few decades. And as much as I truly love my digital cameras ... well, I must say that the image quality from film is SO far superior on a grand scale, especially when you expose your negatives precisely, when you use a low ISO film, and when you use a full quality professional lab for your final results. The only problems ... ? The cost of film and developing, and the inability to enhance with Photoshop when necessary if you have no way of scanning your negatives. But from what I understand ... the newish 50+ MP digital cameras, especially those from Fuji, surely give film a run for the money.
The only limiting factor with film is the photographic paper on which it is printed, which doesn't offer a wide dynamic range when needed. Your scenes need to be quite well lit in every section of your photo if you hope to see good detail, such as inside a large dance hall. Adding additional portable lights here and there inside the room, equipped with a slave, can be useful. Those were actually the good old days. It was much more work, but I enjoyed it more. But yeah, I also love digital -
I find the difference becomes apparent when I’m unable to find a place to put the SIM card in my enlarger…
😆 I don’t think that’s where they go. Thanks for watching. Did you get the film vs digital images correct?
Sorry, I didn’t look. My interest is only in prints. I do believe I can tell the difference between a silver gelatin print and an inkjet one tho.
@@mike747436 I’ll mail ya some
I grow up with film and I’m so glad that digital is nowadays available and I will not jump on this hype. It limits your creativity as it slows you down. I will stay in the digital world. 😉👍
Thanks for your perspective and for watching! Keep on keeping on
Killer Video Hunter, Keep it up bro! I definitely blow money on film haha.
Me and you both 😅 thanks so much for watching and taking time to comment. Did ya get the film vs digital images correct?
I just shot a roll of portra400 and printed it. My 16mp 12 year old digital camera images looks great in 70x50cm prins while the portra400 is ok at 10x15cm. Shot film for 25 years but digital cameras crushes film since around 15 years back when it comes to print. I print alot so I want quality. I also like the analogue look so I use vintage lenses on digital cameras.
That’s awesome, I am not surprised that a 12 year old camera is still doing well. I just made a video about the 5D Mark iii and how impressive it still is. Love me some adapted glass, what’s your favorite? Thanks so much for watching!
@@hunterhart1 Konica Hexanon 50mm 1.7, Summicron 35mmf2 & 7artisans 35mm1.2 mark2
@@Swingkid14 how are you liking the Konica?
When I first started in photography I had to wait a week to a fortnight before my film was returned, then the 24 hour labs started, then it was a huge revelation when you could drop off a film at a lab, have lunch and about an hour later pick up your prints. I went fully digital, my first digital proper was a 6 mp Canon, and regularly find 10 to 12 MP is fine for what I want, a Fujifilm real 3D is with me at all times, 10 MP stereo with a conventional JPG.
I have recently returned to 120 film, 5x9cm bellows with only 8 shots per film, but find slowing down and thinking about the shot is fun. On order is a Zorki 1 camera and I’m sure it will be just as enjoyable. Brought up with film I guess never leaves you.
Started with film some 45 years ago. Then switched to digital 20 years later. Now I shoot both. Develop myself. Both black/white and C41. And scanning. Setting up a darkroom for b/w prints this fall.
That’s great, hope you have a great time. I’ve done development a hand full of time and I’m just to impatient. I have a friend that works at indie film lab that does mine now. Thanks so much for watching
Cool Man !
🙏🏼🤙🏼 thanks man
@@hunterhart1 welcome 🙏🏼 Hart
Let me bring you down a bit about film cost so your computer is 3 grand, memory cards, hard drives, cables, cloud storage none of those are free. How about this longevity those glass plates from the 1850 can still make a print anyone have a computer that will run a floppy disk computer’s die and hard crash and have to be replaced
Sounds like you should stick to film!