Testing Every Bomb, Rocket + Missile against a Nuclear Tank (Object 279) in War Thunder

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 503

  • @ThunderWithMuffin
    @ThunderWithMuffin  Рік тому +50

    Install Raid for Free ✅ IOS/ANDROID/PC: pl.go-ga.me/gw2qjig1 and get a special starter pack with an Epic champion ⚡️Tallia⚡️ Available only for new players! 🎁 Use the promo code JTSKIN to get the Epic champion Stag Knight and a Skin for Stag Knight designed by JonTron! Don't miss your chance, the promo code is valid until October 7th, only for new players. 📱 If you are an iOS user, enter the promo code here: plarium.com/en/redeem/raid-shadow-legends/

    • @Neverlose001
      @Neverlose001 Рік тому +9

      Raid shadow legends cant help the war thunder grind

    • @Shinzon23
      @Shinzon23 Рік тому +7

      Was there really no other sponsor other than the shitty mobile game?

    • @supremegreaser2399
      @supremegreaser2399 Рік тому +2

      Pretty sure that Maus would survive more.

    • @Monarch_MercenaryPMC
      @Monarch_MercenaryPMC Рік тому +2

      I rather play War Thunder every single day without stopping rather play that Sh###y "mobile game" that I always hate and will never play their crappy game even if they pay me a crap ton of money.

    • @supremegreaser2399
      @supremegreaser2399 Рік тому +3

      @@Monarch_MercenaryPMC I hate Warthunder.

  • @Quang_Tran_asdf
    @Quang_Tran_asdf Рік тому +202

    Obj 279: Designed to be able withstand shockwave from a nuke without flipping over
    Obj 279 ingame: Absolute bomb-proof but still flipped by a bomb

  • @maral2014
    @maral2014 Рік тому +1645

    A lot of these WOULD kill if you are lucky enough to get an absolute direct hit onto the roof.

    • @asillylildude
      @asillylildude Рік тому +72

      or under the hull in the middle, there really isn’t armor there (edit) this can happen even with a 50lbs to a sherman if the sherman were to drive on top of the bomb 2nd edit i meant 250lbs sorry

    • @bagelmaster2498
      @bagelmaster2498 Рік тому +90

      @@asillylildude actually no i saw another video where they gave the bombs longer timers and the tank drove right on top of the bomb and only 1000kg+ bombs would kill it, it is legitimately coded to be immune to those bombs even though it would probably die

    • @ZachmanMMX
      @ZachmanMMX Рік тому +4

      this man, fish react him

    • @asillylildude
      @asillylildude Рік тому

      @@bagelmaster2498 huh i saw a spookston vid where this happened with a sherman and 250 pounder so i’m not sure?

    • @asillylildude
      @asillylildude Рік тому

      @@bagelmaster2498 and i meant 250lbs

  • @deathstarisop4791
    @deathstarisop4791 Рік тому +710

    I love how Obj. 279 survives almost everything but i got killed by Friendly Arty Strike with it 2days ago

    • @maxwellmaragia2272
      @maxwellmaragia2272 Рік тому +42

      Lmao...you must have gotten really mad I guess. Seen ostwinds kill this things frontally

    • @danielhale5363
      @danielhale5363 Рік тому +13

      I've died from a single m247 40 mm he shell overpessuring the front beak of my 279 and same thing with a he shell from zsu 57 2

    • @fasztorta0001
      @fasztorta0001 Рік тому +2

      The Gepard can kill it too frontally

    • @barronhelmutschnitzelnazi2188
      @barronhelmutschnitzelnazi2188 Рік тому +2

      I've died by arty before with the 279. Landed right above the turret and tank was a goner

    • @carrfolds6889
      @carrfolds6889 Рік тому +1

      My first death in my 279 was by artillery, literally my first match.

  • @kahelo_nya
    @kahelo_nya Рік тому +526

    It would be awesome if the bomb timers were longer and drive over it for much more direct damage ig

    • @theallmightyego6756
      @theallmightyego6756 Рік тому +38

      Ehhhh, it will survive a FAB-1000 directly under it, but not an SC1000

    • @Mycikakat
      @Mycikakat Рік тому +9

      @@theallmightyego6756 oh, funny seeing another youtuber here.
      (Just saying, the T-26 is the best reserve tank, rank it higher please)

    • @JahmeenJones
      @JahmeenJones Рік тому +4

      or te bomber needs better aim

    • @TitaniusAnglesmith
      @TitaniusAnglesmith Рік тому

      You can set them up to 10 seconds

    • @marthstelar
      @marthstelar Рік тому

      I don't think anyone would drive over a bomb irl

  • @BambeH
    @BambeH Рік тому +99

    I was doing the Sturmtiger + drone strat with a friend, and at the time was new to the BR so didn't recognize the Object 279.
    It was the cleanest direct hit with thr sturmtiger we had managed to score yet, but all it did was blow off the tracks lmao.

    • @alpacaofthemountain8760
      @alpacaofthemountain8760 Рік тому +2

      Tf

    • @Mycikakat
      @Mycikakat Рік тому +2

      @@alpacaofthemountain8760 ?

    • @zohaibtariq7351
      @zohaibtariq7351 Рік тому +4

      Russian bias

    • @Rono99
      @Rono99 Рік тому +3

      @@zohaibtariq7351yep😂 bc at some point it dont matter how much armor you have you aint living a fucking battle ship sized bomb

  • @robotmexicainducky6865
    @robotmexicainducky6865 Рік тому +195

    I think if you remove all your ammo and you would survive longer like when the f-16 did the 500s you survived but then the ammo cooked off

    • @ThunderWithMuffin
      @ThunderWithMuffin  Рік тому +41

      Good point

    • @glowyy606
      @glowyy606 Рік тому +10

      @@ThunderWithMuffinnot really. I don’t think you would drive around in battle without ammo so it just kinda makes it more accurate

    • @Mroziukz
      @Mroziukz Рік тому +5

      @@glowyy606 yes but this should be a pure test of hull endurance.

  • @mr.skully8787
    @mr.skully8787 Рік тому +130

    Gaijin: theres no such thing as russian bias
    Also gaijin:

    • @hashteraksgage3281
      @hashteraksgage3281 Рік тому +33

      This thing was supposed to withstand a nuclear blast, makes sense it's like this ingame

    • @zenitu6914
      @zenitu6914 Рік тому +37

      @@hashteraksgage3281no it wasn’t.
      It was meant to be deployed in a nuclear environment

    • @daltondraws3087
      @daltondraws3087 Рік тому +10

      @@zenitu6914bro who tf gonna be fighting in a nuclear environment

    • @Pointclearius
      @Pointclearius Рік тому +13

      @@daltondraws3087 So... alot of strategies for the cold war in europe was the usage of ALOT of tactical nukes. So, everyone was expecting to be fighting in that environment to some degree. The US even trained for this by operating infantry and vehicles whilst conducting nuclear bomb tests.... That is as stupid as you think it is.
      The 279 was designed to fight in these environments by having a more sterile/sealed design allowing them to be buttoned up to avoid the worst of the radiation. I'm not sure if this next bit is true but I've heard that it was designed to be able to be operational after a nuclear strike. Not a direct hit ofc and the crew likely wouldnt have survived but the tank could have been made operational fairly easily.

    • @daltondraws3087
      @daltondraws3087 Рік тому

      @@Pointclearius it just doesn’t make sense that they would be fighting in an unsafe environment probably spending and sacrificing more equipment just to be able to stand in it

  • @memethief4113
    @memethief4113 Рік тому +182

    I think the test would be better if you actually had bombs that hit their target instead of missing

    • @daltondraws3087
      @daltondraws3087 Рік тому +41

      To be fair though they usually never land on the tank in game anyway

    • @thesovietduck2121
      @thesovietduck2121 Рік тому +28

      And to be fair the tank was meant to withstand the aftermath of a nuclear blast and not the blast itself

    • @iii_zeta_iii
      @iii_zeta_iii Рік тому +3

      I dont think that makes sense at all tbh

    • @addman1952
      @addman1952 Рік тому +3

      its armor is meant to stop blasts coming from the side, its as weak as any other tank from the top so why would need to test that?

    • @bartsincarnate8289
      @bartsincarnate8289 Рік тому +2

      It's hard to aim a bomb

  • @ozz3201
    @ozz3201 Рік тому +15

    once i got bombed like 6 times (all 1000lb bombs) by a very upset enemy team, this thing just refuses to die to bombs its so funny

  • @no-legjohnny3691
    @no-legjohnny3691 Рік тому +61

    What's funny is that, while the hull design is made so that the tank isn't flipped like a flapjack if it was in the blast zone of a nuclear bomb, it was only so the tank can be recovered and used even in the wake of a blast. Having this thing survive the blast _and continue fighting_ was never a concern by the engineers or military bureaus that designed it.
    So yes, the tank itself could survive a close miss, but the crew would have their insides turned to soup by the shockwave, or in the case of a nuclear bomb, be cooked alive by the radiation.

    • @DeathlordSlavik
      @DeathlordSlavik Рік тому +17

      Crew should actually be fine as the thickness of the armor will stop any radiation and the design allows the shockwave to roll over the tank rather then slam into it.

    • @no-legjohnny3691
      @no-legjohnny3691 Рік тому +8

      @@DeathlordSlavik It takes upwards of 10 inches of steel to stop Gamma radiation, and while there are sections of the tank that are that thick, most of it isn't and is vulnerable to practically any source of radiation, whether it be the initial blast or the radioactive dust of the residual fallout. Also, while the hull design can mitigate shockwaves, it can only do so much, essentially making the kill radius slightly smaller.

    • @DeathlordSlavik
      @DeathlordSlavik Рік тому +27

      ​@@no-legjohnny3691 You need to do better research as only 3 inches is enough to reduce it by a factor of 10 as you don't need to stop it entirely just reduce it. Also you are forgetting that gamma radiation doesn't travel very far through the atmosphere and when combined with the inverse square law of distance to dosage you will be safe from the radiation in such a tank. The radioactive dust doesn't emit enough to be a problem for a armored vehicle due to not emitting enough to penetrate solid material effectively as the danger from radioactive dust is direct unprotected exposure not exposure through what is effectively a steel wall.
      The design does more then make the kill radius slightly smaller it makes it significantly smaller due to how shockwaves actually work and how they transfer from one material to another.

    • @nikolaperic6307
      @nikolaperic6307 Рік тому

      You tested it so you know i see

    • @NoFlyZone31
      @NoFlyZone31 Рік тому +3

      @@DeathlordSlavikMy dude, it does not matter. The pressure wave from a big enough bomb would shred the crew as it launches the tank, you’re just not surviving.
      You would get splattered against the insides of the vehicle.

  • @collander7766
    @collander7766 Рік тому +117

    Yeah it's quite literally immune to all HE. No matter the size of the bomb, and no matter where you hit it, it does nothing. Me and my friend did extensive testing and I dropped a 2000 lb LGB directly onto the top of the turret, top of the hull, under the hull... nothing. Mavericks work because they're HEAT

    • @raflyalifismail665
      @raflyalifismail665 Рік тому +5

      that kind of bullshit isthe thing that keep this thing price in market through the roof

    • @firebyte69
      @firebyte69 Рік тому +1

      How think is this thing's roof armor??

    • @Theworld-ct2bl
      @Theworld-ct2bl Рік тому +1

      16 120kg bombs killed it at 7:42

    • @Theworld-ct2bl
      @Theworld-ct2bl Рік тому +1

      7:58 also here with the f16.

    • @Theworld-ct2bl
      @Theworld-ct2bl Рік тому +1

      8:30 another death lmaoo

  • @Kwarduk
    @Kwarduk Рік тому +49

    When you want to troll CAS, this is the tank you break out

  • @XxermandxX
    @XxermandxX Рік тому +11

    It wasnt designed to survive from a nuclear blast, this is a legend born on internet. The strange shape of the tank was like this just to increase the armour thikness against heat and apds shells. It was called nuclear tank because it had good NBC for the time and 4 tracks that will help in case of mud and hard terrain caused by a nuclear explosion.

    • @BasedGrandmasKitchen
      @BasedGrandmasKitchen Рік тому +3

      Source?

    • @XxermandxX
      @XxermandxX Рік тому +5

      @@BasedGrandmasKitchen
      - ''Техника и вооружение 2017 N°12'';
      - ''Техника и вооружение 2018 N°1'';
      - ''Отечественные Бронированные Машины ХХ век Том 3. 1946-1965''.

    • @BasedGrandmasKitchen
      @BasedGrandmasKitchen Рік тому +1

      @@XxermandxX I don't speak russain

    • @XxermandxX
      @XxermandxX Рік тому +7

      @@BasedGrandmasKitchen i miss the part where that's my problem

    • @xanafein8453
      @xanafein8453 9 місяців тому

      ​@BasedGrandmasKitchen you're aware of the fact that it's an experimental soviet tank and as a result a vast majority of first party source information is gonna be in russian right?

  • @roydpower9542
    @roydpower9542 Рік тому +3

    I think if tank flips in real life because of bomb it’s 95% that all crew are dead, and 5% that someone is screaming with every bone broken inside a tank

  • @Neverlose001
    @Neverlose001 Рік тому +40

    Weakest Soviet tank vs Strongest explosives

  • @Ogabgól
    @Ogabgól Рік тому +6

    I like how he took a lot of damage with the 25kg missiles but almost nothing with the 100kg ones

  • @EnglishGamer2019
    @EnglishGamer2019 Рік тому +7

    I can only imagine the sound inside the compartment. They probably went deaf after all these bombing runs or should’ve died from shock after all that noise

    • @adude8816
      @adude8816 Рік тому

      Tank crews wear ear protection for a reason...

    • @EnglishGamer2019
      @EnglishGamer2019 Рік тому

      @@adude8816 use a bit of your imagination. The tank survived a Lancaster bomb and was being bombarded by various bomb loads one after the other. That sound protection will only cover so much

    • @adude8816
      @adude8816 Рік тому

      @@EnglishGamer2019 imagination? After that they would be dead lmao. They ain't gonna be hearing nothing. Noise won't kill them first I can tell you that much.

    • @EnglishGamer2019
      @EnglishGamer2019 Рік тому

      @@adude8816 I think you missed the word, shock

    • @adude8816
      @adude8816 Рік тому

      @@EnglishGamer2019 and again. Shock would not kill them first. If they are eligible to operate such a vehicle, it should be obvious that shock would not be what kills them. They are trained to operate a vehicle that Is built to survive a nuclear blast. Im sure that they wouldn't choose just ANY tank crewman to operate such a vehicle.

  • @Lapegacorn
    @Lapegacorn Рік тому +21

    Those Viggen bombs are no joke lol I'll use them solely in CAS

  • @anthonysmejia5362
    @anthonysmejia5362 Рік тому +4

    Well it wasn't designed to take a direct hit from a nuke or any high explosive it was designed to withstand the shock wave and extreme force of a nuke , anything within the ground zero of a nuclear bomb would most definitely be atomized seeing as most nukes can leave a very very large crater in the earth

  • @X76WoTB
    @X76WoTB 11 місяців тому

    5:30 was hilarious “dude this thing is a** proof. 😂😂

  • @AjEdw
    @AjEdw Рік тому +9

    Woooooo, the goat posted, thanks for another great video bro, keep it up, love to see em :)

  • @tuanzixiao3666
    @tuanzixiao3666 Рік тому +3

    "dude this thing is ass proof"
    hmmm muffin got his priorities straight

  • @Black_Faker-officialYT
    @Black_Faker-officialYT 10 місяців тому +17

    Now thats a nokia tank

  • @MaplePanda04
    @MaplePanda04 Рік тому +4

    Slight correction: I’m pretty sure CCIP is continuously calculated impact point, not computer calculated.

  • @RadiantCataclysm
    @RadiantCataclysm Рік тому +10

    This was great! Thanks for doing this type of stuff when some of us cant.

  • @YDX4
    @YDX4 9 місяців тому +1

    War thunder❌
    War muffin✅

  • @AlexI-x1z
    @AlexI-x1z Рік тому +2

    every bomb can kill you if pilot wouldn`t drunk...

  • @literallyanf15eagle
    @literallyanf15eagle 9 місяців тому

    5:28 *"Dude this thing is ass-proof!"*
    -Muffin, 2023

  • @NatTheGreat143
    @NatTheGreat143 Рік тому +7

    This was a breath of fresh air muffin 😁 keep it.up my man!

  • @fitejansen
    @fitejansen Рік тому

    - Этот танк проектировался способным выдержать ядерный взрыв.
    - Но не прямое же попадание...
    - А, да?

  • @maximilianschneider7459
    @maximilianschneider7459 4 місяці тому

    Bombs: i will destroy you
    Tonk: Nah id win

  • @MiguelLopez-so7pw
    @MiguelLopez-so7pw Рік тому +3

    girls: I don't know why men live less than women. / boys: (the video)

  • @kartoffelschaeler11
    @kartoffelschaeler11 Рік тому +1

    Pro tipp: you can press "O" to see an X-Ray of the damaged compartments

  • @Mycikakat
    @Mycikakat Рік тому +4

    FINALLY MY QUESTIONS HAVE BEEN ANSWERED about whether or not the un-CAS-able tank could die from a lancaster!

    • @hypophiseadenome
      @hypophiseadenome Рік тому +1

      If a PE-8 with 5k can kill it, a Lancaster can kill it... Think au little man.

    • @Mycikakat
      @Mycikakat Рік тому

      @@hypophiseadenome well i didnt know the PE-8 could kill it so...

    • @hypophiseadenome
      @hypophiseadenome Рік тому

      You can see it in the video at the end... You comment without watching ? WTF...

    • @Mycikakat
      @Mycikakat Рік тому +1

      @@hypophiseadenome i was just excited to find a video that shows the Obj 279's limit bc i have been searching for the past 2 days...
      So i left a comment THEN watched it...

    • @hypophiseadenome
      @hypophiseadenome Рік тому +1

      The fun part is that it as no lancaster in the video because the pe-8 kill it...

  • @Rescher
    @Rescher Рік тому +2

    I mean it says the tank survives not the crew or the tracks but the tank😂

  • @ivanthegod49
    @ivanthegod49 Рік тому +1

    I wish that dude was a bit more accurate, you'd still survive a surprising amount but you'd definitely die more

  • @Pro-German-main
    @Pro-German-main Рік тому +1

    The crew is gonna die of motion sickness before they die of a actual explosion

  • @funtuk4364
    @funtuk4364 8 місяців тому

    I look forward to your uploads every week. Keep up the fantastic work!

  • @merafirewing6591
    @merafirewing6591 Рік тому +2

    Lmfao! You should've done the Lancaster just for the lols.

  • @WaiforXD
    @WaiforXD Рік тому

    That one crew member that always stays alive: 💀

  • @patricklandfarth1182
    @patricklandfarth1182 Рік тому +1

    Gaijin: realistic russian documints show that crew is made from stalinium and has 300% health

  • @joe125ful
    @joe125ful Рік тому

    5:52 Nice flip!
    6:26 And flipped back:)

  • @torek1991
    @torek1991 Рік тому +1

    Good to know is there someone who drop bombs worse than me xD

  • @walking_boys
    @walking_boys Рік тому +1

    I don’t know if it’s modeled in the game but in real life even the smallest bomb would cause damage to the crew via concussion or with bigger bombs having a HESH like effect on the tank

  • @meepy2739
    @meepy2739 Рік тому

    5:29 "ass proof"
    -Thunder with muffin 2023

  • @kriskay5020
    @kriskay5020 Рік тому +2

    One of the few tanks I want for Xmas

  • @untethered3
    @untethered3 Рік тому +11

    Okay, here’s why the bombs never hurt the crew
    The object 279 was designed to be blast proof to nuclear weapons to an extent, meaning, everything should be alright when hit, so war thunder coded the crew impossible to kill with bombs

    • @darthnihilus2729
      @darthnihilus2729 Рік тому +3

      No, it's not. It was meant to be deployed in a post-nuclear apocalyptic environment. If anything, the engineers hoped that it could survive the shockwave of a nuclear blast at the very edge of it, due to the extra tracks, but this was never tested. It did however have anti-radiation lining and such. So, in conclusion, the armor was arranged this way to give it the best possible protection ever, the nuclear part of it was just propaganda. If anything it would've been shockwave-proof, not blast proof.

    • @Grabenkult7734
      @Grabenkult7734 Рік тому

      @@darthnihilus2729 Warthunder players when Tank doesnt survive a direct hit from a Nuclear Missile: 😱

  • @HiYo-bro
    @HiYo-bro Рік тому +2

    What destroys is just a single 2 pound bomb 😂😂😂😂😂

  • @NarrowKilla
    @NarrowKilla Рік тому

    I'm pretty sure nothing can survive a glorious 5 ton bomb dropped from a beautiful pe8

  • @merriklink4382
    @merriklink4382 Місяць тому

    7:06 this is the greatest plannnnnnn

  • @cmachnubertyxa2974
    @cmachnubertyxa2974 Рік тому

    A tank is designed to SURVIVE a nuclear war, not to SURVIVE a nuclear war.A tank is built to SURVIVE a nuclear war, not to SURVIVE a nuclear strike

  • @DelilahBkht
    @DelilahBkht 5 місяців тому

    your content is always spot on, thanks for being so reliable!

  • @Statink
    @Statink Рік тому +3

    perfectly balanced as all thing should be

  • @pensive7270
    @pensive7270 Рік тому +4

    8:43 that's a lie. S5K's are HEAT rockets

  • @mr.tweaty
    @mr.tweaty 8 місяців тому

    4:50 I genuinely doubt this kind of damage would be sufficient to disable the main gun. I could definitely see reduced accuracy, but a majority of the barrel is still intact.

  • @M60A3
    @M60A3 Рік тому

    Pretty sure the crew inside won’t fight back if they got concussions from the tank rolling on the side after a bomb explosion

  • @determination9296
    @determination9296 Рік тому +2

    Wish i could get this. Too bad i wasnt playing warthunder before it released and now with its hell of a price point

  • @SuperUndercover1234
    @SuperUndercover1234 Рік тому +1

    Bruh me and my friend took it to custom and he ate my 14 Inch Arizona gun and my 12 Inch Alaska gun. Both HE and APCBC.

  • @lewis5908-cn8mi
    @lewis5908-cn8mi 3 місяці тому

    Bro seriously forgot about the British bombers with the 4000lb cookie or the 12000lb bunker buster

  • @lukefriesenhahn8186
    @lukefriesenhahn8186 Рік тому +7

    In real life, the Objecket-279 was a lightly armored, but heavily armed heavy tank, built for one purpose; to roll across the nuclear waist land, and to kill any surviving resistance...
    It was not bomb-proof, that is only because of volumetrics being inputted into a video game/software, which isn't always accurate. It had good stand-off explosive potential, but was lightly armored for a heavy tank. I do have to say that its spaced armor was a good idea for the time, considering that HESH was still dominant.
    Great video tho. 👍

  • @able2adventure818
    @able2adventure818 8 місяців тому

    You just experienced a delayed annihilation (if you get that reference good job😂)

  • @imaheadout8529
    @imaheadout8529 Рік тому +1

    spookston simulator

  • @IronBridge1781
    @IronBridge1781 Рік тому +14

    Why does no one ever use the actual biggest bomb in the game in these kinds of videos? The Lancasters 12,000 pounder.

    • @osmanturk769
      @osmanturk769 Рік тому +2

      I think 5000KGs equals to 12000LBs so they are practically the same?

    • @TamamoF0X
      @TamamoF0X Рік тому +5

      @@osmanturk769 actual weight means nothing, its the actual explosive mass that matters.
      FAB-5000 uses 3361kg of TGA-16 (5041kg TNT) while the 12000lb HC Blockbuster uses 3973kg of Torpex (6357kg TNT).
      Thats a 1300kg of difference when it comes to TNT equivalent.

    • @IronBridge1781
      @IronBridge1781 Рік тому +2

      @@osmanturk769 5,000 Kg is ~ 11,000lbs

    • @thetonk2173
      @thetonk2173 Рік тому +1

      Watch the vid until the end

    • @hypophiseadenome
      @hypophiseadenome Рік тому +2

      If a PE-8 with 5k can kill it, a Lancaster can kill it... Think au little man.

  • @edgychico9311
    @edgychico9311 Рік тому +2

    Fun fact, did you know that an IS-2 can survive almost all bombs in WT?

    • @porosus2469
      @porosus2469 Рік тому

      We need a video on that!

    • @TeaCrate
      @TeaCrate Рік тому

      fun fact, I died to 1000lb bombs 2 times in my IS-2 1944 in one match

  • @justcallmesteve9123
    @justcallmesteve9123 Рік тому

    It's not designed to withstand a nuclear blast. It's designed to withstand a nuclear shockwave. And to be able to move over extreme terrain (like post-nuclear city rubble, vegetation or craters).

  • @АлександрБессонов-н2н

    how do i can do missions like that with AI and what do i need for that?

  • @bkd97
    @bkd97 Рік тому

    the last 20 seconds really saved you from a hate comment the 1200lb bomb needs to be shown and used more #

  • @viniscreios
    @viniscreios Рік тому

    Dude, why the video starts only at 2:34...? For real, man. I would have just given up the rest if it wasn't for the chapters on the bar.

  • @Supah-bt8jv
    @Supah-bt8jv Рік тому

    That thing is an absolute monster

  • @BENITO_SWAGOLINI21
    @BENITO_SWAGOLINI21 Рік тому +1

    I hate to be this guy but bombs are near enough useless against it the hull was designed to move the shockwaves around the tank smoothly so most bombs don’t effect it to much

  • @Caktusdud.
    @Caktusdud. Рік тому +1

    I wanna take this further into a a little fun made up scenario.
    Its 1950 something kind of area it we're in (insert map)
    So the Americans, british, French and germans are on one team and the soviets are on the other.
    The soviets have brought our their new super tank. The object 279 (she has got some other random tanks as well) to stop the advance of these countries.
    They cause trouble walking through the ranks of the ground forces and even the helicopters cant kill it.
    So they call the fleet.
    The carrier (lets say forrestal) launch aircraft (ranks 3 to 5) to assist.
    Can they stop these monsters before they take too many losses?
    Could be fun.

  • @Marder_IFV
    @Marder_IFV Рік тому +1

    Do you think (if not already) let viewers participate in these types if videos if they want to?

  • @x_.Yuri._x
    @x_.Yuri._x Рік тому

    At this point, this tank is a bunker for anyone.

  • @Send_jet
    @Send_jet 6 місяців тому

    All the times he flipped reminds me of the time when I was chilling in my M4 and then a bomb blew up next to me killing a teammate and flipping over next to a building. I asked teammates near me to help me in chat but they ignored me. Then an enemy tank came right behind me a killed me. :/

  • @Feuervix
    @Feuervix Рік тому +1

    It's not made to survive the explosion just the blast, "if it hit the roof or the hull it would destroyed it" as far as I know there's no tank that can survive a direct hit from a 100/200kg bomb

    • @barronhelmutschnitzelnazi2188
      @barronhelmutschnitzelnazi2188 Рік тому

      I've seen it survived 1k bombs that landed on the engine deck. Bombs landing on the roof is a very possible kill though. Bullpup rockets can kill it that way so no doubt bombs would too.

    • @Feuervix
      @Feuervix Рік тому

      @@barronhelmutschnitzelnazi2188 to be fair ive seen a l3/33 survive a fab5000 that landed basically on top of it

  • @harrisonowens9388
    @harrisonowens9388 Рік тому

    Wow! This thing is nuts

  • @c4r4gh72
    @c4r4gh72 Рік тому +1

    You should try the KV-220

  • @AODGreyhound
    @AODGreyhound Рік тому

    i was looking forward to seeing the Fritz-X

  • @apolakigamingandmore6376
    @apolakigamingandmore6376 Рік тому

    The Soviets over-exaggerated things, sooo... now try a real Nuke.

  • @Srkora50
    @Srkora50 Рік тому +1

    Great video! Please do a Maus version!

  • @Manki911
    @Manki911 Рік тому

    As the person in the tank i can confirm that this was safe

  • @noahsawesomevids422
    @noahsawesomevids422 Рік тому +1

    Finally ❤❤❤

  • @Bruvwhatuon
    @Bruvwhatuon Рік тому

    2:20 minutes of sponsoring great

  • @efexeiii
    @efexeiii Місяць тому

    i love muffins so i sub

  • @Edsallg
    @Edsallg 7 місяців тому

    One document leak and its all over idek if you can find one about this tank because it really old

  • @felixgutierrez993
    @felixgutierrez993 Рік тому +1

    Funny of what the Russians thought when making this tank. I get nothing in the world can save you if a nuke fell on top of you but for the earlier bombs the shrapnel wouldn't be what kills you but the kinetic energy of the tank itself would turn the people inside into paste. The tank itself would be the weapon for the crew like if you shook something REALLY HARD and there was someone inside in a metal box yeah they'd be dead lol.

  • @erictsang3603
    @erictsang3603 Рік тому

    Even a 60kg Japanese bomb can kill Obj279 if it lands on right spot

  • @JohnCutright-i8h
    @JohnCutright-i8h Рік тому

    How in the hell did you get a war thunder video and you got sponsored by raid

  • @leandrogoethals6599
    @leandrogoethals6599 Рік тому

    What are those weird sides made of?
    era of some kind?

  • @itzmethang
    @itzmethang Рік тому +1

    A 100 mm pen APHE

  • @the_real_c14yt0n
    @the_real_c14yt0n Рік тому

    The reason all the ww2 stuff wouldn't kill is because like older shells on tanks, older bombs will have a hard time killing modern tanks

  • @Heavy-weapons-guy-Tf2-t5n
    @Heavy-weapons-guy-Tf2-t5n 4 місяці тому +1

    5:29 it sure is ass proof

  • @bolts1sd3d
    @bolts1sd3d 2 місяці тому

    Maybe try it again but without the ammo inside the tank.

  • @urip_zukoharjo
    @urip_zukoharjo Рік тому

    Yup, this thing is a certified as5-proof

  • @printer12345
    @printer12345 4 місяці тому

    15cm sig he shell can kill crew by over pressure if you shoot those stuff that moves the tank

  • @theonetruefunk9628
    @theonetruefunk9628 Рік тому

    Funny, I've been killed by a 60kg from an A6M2 in this tank before, not even directly underneath me

  • @EmeraldDuke
    @EmeraldDuke Рік тому

    So funny enough I leanered that timed bombs stand a worse chance at killing the tank then assault fuses.

  • @idkimbored279
    @idkimbored279 11 місяців тому

    I got a war thunder ad lol

  • @LucasC-u4f
    @LucasC-u4f Рік тому +1

    Hehehehe boom boom 279 baby!!!