Don't Buy Another RF Lens Until You Try Canon's Ultimate RF 24-105mm F2.8 L IS USM Z!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 37

  • @chiliverde66
    @chiliverde66 Місяць тому

    I just picked up this lens. I wanted to replace my EF 24-70 f/2.8 with the RF version. While researching, I saw this and kept looking into it as an option. So far I am happy with it for the extra range and it is really fast in focusing. I mainly do still images and want to look at doing more video in the future. I think I can use this is my everyday carry since I am used to having my EF 70-200 f/2.8 on it for the most part.

  • @SatyaS_Pradhan
    @SatyaS_Pradhan 2 місяці тому +1

    Just got done with the other video on canon's channel ... as a Canon user I feel this will be 'the one lens that does it all' for generations of Canon camera's to come .... the 105 f2.8 will create amazing portraits with amazing bokeh...

  • @dnbcatalina6192
    @dnbcatalina6192 2 місяці тому

    Jack of all trade : master of none, still I love the trinity concept.
    RF 15-35 f2.8
    RF 28-70 f2.0
    RF 70-200 f4.0
    My ultimate choice ❤

  • @bnkakl
    @bnkakl 2 місяці тому

    loved the short film!!

  • @shootloadrepeat
    @shootloadrepeat 2 місяці тому

    Thanks for the great video! Could I ask what camera bag that is in the frame?

    • @PIXELVIILAGE
      @PIXELVIILAGE  2 місяці тому +1

      It’s an Indian camera luggage brand called Mobius. 👍

  • @malayaliyan
    @malayaliyan 19 днів тому

    What is the cost of all these equipments together?

  • @jintokj3661
    @jintokj3661 2 місяці тому

    Nice video... Great lens.. 💚

  • @hasifparamban1441
    @hasifparamban1441 2 місяці тому

    I am a Sony user. I already have 24-105 f4. My key focus is landscape videography. It’s this aperture fine ?
    I guess external zoom is not that much great for gimbal since it affect gimbal balancing

    • @PIXELVIILAGE
      @PIXELVIILAGE  2 місяці тому

      If you are a landscape photographer, you may not need this one. The PZ is for smooth zooming while on Tripod. This lenses is not exactly designed to be used with a 3-Axis Gimbal. 🙏

  • @akhilachu34
    @akhilachu34 2 місяці тому

    4:34 That's not Aperture ring, right? You were focusing on Focal length ring. I can see Aperture ring is far below.

  • @jishnoo
    @jishnoo 2 місяці тому +1

    I still prefer Tamron’s 35-150mm f2-2.8. In fact, I moved to sony for this lens.

    • @PIXELVIILAGE
      @PIXELVIILAGE  2 місяці тому

      That’s another excellent lens if you want more at the Tele end. Of course available only as E mount!

    • @akhilsiby
      @akhilsiby 2 місяці тому

      ​@PIXELVIILAGE now available on z mount as well.

  • @lallawmapachuau4708
    @lallawmapachuau4708 2 місяці тому

    Sir can you review godox litemons la300bi And 300c. They released it and no one have review it yet.

  • @sweetblueman
    @sweetblueman 2 місяці тому

    What about stills for birds and butterflies? 105mm zoom is that enough?

    • @PIXELVIILAGE
      @PIXELVIILAGE  2 місяці тому

      May be Butterflies… but not for Birds.

  • @FailedFun
    @FailedFun 2 місяці тому

    Sir please creat a video on diamond ring photography

  • @dillikemusafir
    @dillikemusafir 2 місяці тому

    Thanks. Regards.

  • @nosom7
    @nosom7 2 місяці тому

    Is there any alternative in Nikon for d850 sir?

    • @PIXELVIILAGE
      @PIXELVIILAGE  2 місяці тому +1

      Yes. Another D850! 🤩

    • @jintokj3661
      @jintokj3661 2 місяці тому +1

      Nikon Z8 ❤

    • @nosom7
      @nosom7 2 місяці тому

      @@PIXELVIILAGE i mean lens like this one sir.

  • @tbowen577
    @tbowen577 2 місяці тому

    Beautiful sound track...

  • @robinlikes2learn
    @robinlikes2learn Місяць тому

    I wish you wouldn't have the background music - I find it difficult to hear what you say and also find it distracting.

  • @goldenstasgs
    @goldenstasgs Місяць тому +1

    What about severe blue and green chromatic aberration and very soft image wide open in case of near shot? It was price for this 70-105 range. I prefer to keep better image quality 24-70 f2.8 with 70-200 f2.8

    • @robinlikes2learn
      @robinlikes2learn Місяць тому

      Exactly what I am considering, having just purchased a R5 MK II with RF 24-70mm.

  • @akhilachu34
    @akhilachu34 2 місяці тому

    8:02 Editor making mistakes again... 🥴

  • @poolpool64
    @poolpool64 Місяць тому

    Canon fan boy!😂😂

  • @personalavh7186
    @personalavh7186 2 місяці тому

    Nice

  • @nikhilsyam7412
    @nikhilsyam7412 2 місяці тому

  • @deeepraveen
    @deeepraveen 2 місяці тому +3

    Too big to carry on travels people will be happy to pull out their phones instead.

    • @chinmayjoshi8750
      @chinmayjoshi8750 Місяць тому +4

      You wont get that quality

    • @dreadnoughtphotowerkz
      @dreadnoughtphotowerkz Місяць тому +3

      This lens isn't for you. Don't buy it. Use your cell phone. Remember, this lens is for professional use.

    • @deeepraveen
      @deeepraveen Місяць тому +1

      @@dreadnoughtphotowerkz just so you know I have this lens but I don’t use as much as I want to use because of the heft and leave it behind and carry a smaller prime, that was my point in the long run people will always something that is portable and lighter to carry around on travels especially . It was exciting for me for the first few days but the practically eventually took over.

    • @dreadnoughtphotowerkz
      @dreadnoughtphotowerkz Місяць тому

      @deeepraveen My point exactly. I'm a working photographer, so I would never use a cell phone to do my job. I could care less about the weight or the size or this lens. So for those who do photograph just while they're on vacation or something like that you're correct maybe this lens isn't a good fit for them. But as a working professional this lens will be perfect.

    • @deeepraveen
      @deeepraveen Місяць тому +1

      @@dreadnoughtphotowerkz that’s exactly what my original comment was, not suitable for travels.