Did you notice that IPA was incorrectly referred directly to Heidegger on the first page? It was meant to be hermeneutic phenomenology, correct? What LLM does Notebook LM use? This kind of mistake can only be made by a class GPT-3.5 model (I do not recall what the Google equivalent is).
Yes, I did notice that! My primary focus was to use the content as an example to demonstrate the functionality of NotebookLM and how it can facilitate learning. As for NotebookLM, it is powered by either Gemini 1.5 or 2.0, making it highly efficient for interactive learning and document analysis. Thank you for pointing that out-I appreciate the keen observation!
@@drphilipadu My concern is that lower-quality models, if used as AI assistants (for example, in NVIVO, MAXQDA, etc.), can lead to the same results as in this NotebookLM example. In my experience, Gemini 2 or ChatGPT 01 pro would know the difference between hermeneutics and double hermeneutics. Do we know what NVIVO is charging for with its $250 subscription? Just curious.
Did you notice that IPA was incorrectly referred directly to Heidegger on the first page? It was meant to be hermeneutic phenomenology, correct? What LLM does Notebook LM use? This kind of mistake can only be made by a class GPT-3.5 model (I do not recall what the Google equivalent is).
Yes, I did notice that! My primary focus was to use the content as an example to demonstrate the functionality of NotebookLM and how it can facilitate learning. As for NotebookLM, it is powered by either Gemini 1.5 or 2.0, making it highly efficient for interactive learning and document analysis. Thank you for pointing that out-I appreciate the keen observation!
@@drphilipadu My concern is that lower-quality models, if used as AI assistants (for example, in NVIVO, MAXQDA, etc.), can lead to the same results as in this NotebookLM example. In my experience, Gemini 2 or ChatGPT 01 pro would know the difference between hermeneutics and double hermeneutics. Do we know what NVIVO is charging for with its $250 subscription? Just curious.