What a great review. I think most reviewers would have quit and named the 8550 the winner before they found where the 18100 excelled. Nice work, man! You're the best!
Just stopping by to say thank you very much for this quick, thorough and calming review! It was a pleasure listening to your impressions and made it very clear for me to get the 8550 since I rely on using different media all the time.
Hi Keith, Im very happy to report that my ET8550 has the range with various photo papers and i am willing to take the very small hit on quality in high gloss prints particularly as i learn more. Oh and i thought the prints on metallic gloss papers that ET8550 produced were very good. Having more range in media settings and paper choices that the et8550 has, was the reason for my choice and i am extremely happy about it👍
@mipmipmipmipmip The Epson Et8550 is way more and beyond ones expectations, an exceptional printer when getting to grips with it. OEM Ink costs are of no concern either, beating everything hands down. its a winner in every department especially for someone like myself who just wants that extra control in printing in a digital world👍
@@markflanagan521I was looking to buy the 18100 but it looks like it’s not available to purchase in the US. I do like that the 8550 is very versatile. My wife wants it print photos from her iPhone onto picture paper. Have you done that on yours? I’ve also heard some people use pigment dye on this machine for a more a longer lasting photo. Have you tried any aftermarket dye?
@@DeestedFirstly I would stick with the Epson ink set(cheap to replace and excellent) as it is made for the printer and I have had no issues with clogging or smearing even when not used for a few weeks. Secondly, yes I have printed some iPhone photos for family and the results were very good even from smaller 1MB files with a simple bit of editing. A larger file would be better still. The modern iPhone can produce larger files so it will be more than capable of producing excellent image quality, far superior to any run of the mill photo labs.
Another great review. I’m getting an 8550. I need the home office features and don’t have space to keep my current Canon all-in-one and a second photo printer. I also plan to print from scanned B&W negatives as well as digital color. It’s the best compromise for me.
@ another question on profiling - is it possible to profile/calibrate the printer by scanning a standard target, printing the scanned image, scanning the print, and comparing it to the original? This analysis could be done with software and if it could be done on Epson’s cloud servers they would get valuable data on that could benefit all of us.
@@Anonymous-mf8ii Not with a normal scanner like on the 8550. The scanner records 3 ill defined r/g/b channels - this doesn't give enough spectral information to build an icc profile. I'm sure this could be utilised in some way, but the main issue is that no printer which would be worthy of the effort/investment [from Epson's POV] would ever come with a scanner... I do look a scanner profiling in the main 8550 review - a good enough quality target is not cheap though...
Hi Keith. I have an Epson SureColor SC P600. I use it for printing archival reports of historic buildings (in Australia). I chose it because it is a pigment ink printer and that's what the specifications call for. I know dye inks have improved a lot over recent years, but they are known to be not as light fast as pigment inks. (not that any of these reports would ever see the light of day after they have been submitted). My printer is not used a lot, it is expensive to run and I have a constant battle keeping the head clog free. The shared black ink line is a horrible thing. I really want to get an EcoTank printer but the only A3 one with a full pigment ink set is the ET-16600, which is not known to be good at printing photos (although I have never seen a print from it). I am pretty keen on the ET-8550, if I can get them to change their mind about submitting reports on dye ink. Do you think this ink with a good fixative would be fairly stable? The photos don't need to be gallery grade, just clear.
I wouldn't say there are 'hidden' reports, go to www.wilhelm-research.com for example - there is a lot of data there...Such testing takes a while. Have a look at my main [written] review for a discussion about the 8550 inkset www.northlight-images.co.uk/epson-et-8550-printer-review/ For archival use though, in an application where it's specified, then the P700 or P900 is what will be needed - no black ink switch. Note that the P700 is a smaller version of the P900, which is next on from the P800. The P700 is not so much a new version of the P600
Very, very helpful. I am 100% after a printer for photo-printing only, so this is very relevant. I could have never read this info on an Epson website or something. Cheers!
Thanks - If you've not seen it, there's quite a bit of extra detail in the main [written] review www.northlight-images.co.uk/epson-et-18100-printer-review/
Great review! I've been thinking of getting a printer upgrade, and based on your review, I'm leaning towards the ET-8550 for art prints and posters. Unfortunately the printer model is not available for sale in my country, and although I could purchase one online, the delivery fees are a tad pricey. The L18050 and its respective inks are available in my country though, and it seems like a solid option, but it's more geared towards photo prints :/
Thanks - with the right paper it's an impressive printer I don't know of any others which do the cards at the moment. They are quite robust but intended for relatively temporary use [conferences and the like]
Great work Keith, given both printers are about the same price it really does help to understand exactly what use case each one is designed for. I'm still undecided which way to go however lol 🤪
Hi Keith i changed my XP 8500 ( i think its the Expression Photo Printer 4 cartridges ) for the ET-8550 , I do like to print a variety of colour pictures and photo's. the XP 8500 did do a great job on Photo Prints ( if you used the correct profiles for the paper your using ) and i was happy for a while with that printer. I decided i wanted a printer that used 6 colours and an Ecotank and after a lot of googling and watching reviews decided on the ET-8550 ( a lot more pricey than most i looked at ), i wasn't expecting the difference in the photo prints to be so far apart, The ET-8550 prints without any profiles was a lot better than the XP 8500 with profiles. I know some people will say its because it uses 6 inks instead of 4 but the difference is the ET 8500 is 5 dye inks and 1 pigment where as the XP was 4 pigment inks so if i'm correct the ET 8500 only uses 1 more ink when printing over the XP 8500 which should not make a huge difference, When i used a profile for the type of paper on the ET 8550 the difference was even greater. i would say if your looking for an all round printer then the ET-8550 is worth considering as with this printer it will do a lot more than just Photo's. All in all at the moment i'm very happy with the print quality of my ET-8550 and even though its a little pricey i still think it was worth the upgrade.
Yes - for a general purpose printer, the 8550 is a solid choice. BTW If you've not seen it, I have a lot more info [and videos] about the 8550 in the main [written] review www.northlight-images.co.uk/epson-et-8550-printer-review/
Thanks for the comparison. I still think the versatility (and the pigment black) of the 8550 makes it the better choice for me. But I wonder why the ink prices are so different. For example the same amount of yellow cost 40% less for the ET18100 than the ET8550. The bottles have the same capacity and look identical, but I supposed they are mechanically incompatible, aren't they?
Hi Keith, Thanks for the very helpful review - answering a lot of my questions. ...if I could make a suggestion... I got really quite frustrated in trying to be sure which printer was which - originally assuming the two screens were showing the two different models, which got me further confused as you spoke of "this one" and "that one". A simple post-it style sign would be really useful to help the 'easily confused' like me! 😆 Thanks again for your insights 🙏
Thanks - noted I'd just note that these videos are supplements to the actual written reviews. In fact this entire channel was created originally at the behest of someone from Canon who thought that my written stuff deserved a wider audience - I didn't believe them - they were right! See: www.northlight-images.co.uk/epson-et-8550-printer-review/ www.northlight-images.co.uk/epson-et-18100-printer-review/ Personally, I still don't care to watch much photography related stuff on UA-cam - but they convinced me I was an outlier in that respect :-)
@@KeithCooper Ha! ...I'm glad they convinced you! I find YT video reviews very useful, and since YT is my version of TV, it's usually my first stop. Thanks for the links, I'll definately have a look, as I'm setting up the 8550 this weekend. All the best 🙏
Im autistic and mainly got a printer (et-2400) to save money on printing pictures of a character, close up of RK900 in Detroit: Become Humans' gallery, and occasionally other things, such as pets. I've been trying to work up to getting the et-8500 or et-8550, but haven't had the money. These pictures are pretty much alive to me and are very important and I'd like them to be as good and as accurate as possible, just as the screenshot was taken. The 2400 has been doing really great. Ultra Premium/Premium Presentation Matte paper seems to be the best paper and most accurate to the picture. The glossy is also weirdly sticky and I carry these pictures around and everything. I usually laminate them, though. And not to mention the glossy is more expensive, so I've stuck with Matte. I just saw an article pop up about this printer and figured it was new, so now I have to see which one is better for me to get now. Edit: typos and: I think the 8550 would still be my goal.
Unfortunately, the 18100 does not yet seem to be available in the US The 2400 inks may not be compatible with some gloss media [not a printer I've tested though]
I have seen a UA-cam video that shows you can get good BW results from a custom profile for the 8550. I think that is the one for me for Art prints around the house and perhaps to sell. I would like to print postcards too.
Yes, custom profiles are one approach... BUT you also have the option of using the ABW print mode in the driver. I've, actually covered a lot of this [with the associated technical stuff] in the main written review and B&W video www.northlight-images.co.uk/epson-et-8550-printer-review/ From the review: "In all examples I tried, the ABW mode of the printer driver was superior to printing using either Epson’s or my own ICC profiles" I'll have to return to this since I keep seeing people suggest profiles for the 8550, which generally are not the best approach if you value good B&W prints. The 18100 [as noted in the review] is simply not that great for B&W www.northlight-images.co.uk/epson-et-18100-printer-review/
Thank you for an excellent comparison. I am almost set on the 8550 now. Are there any others like the 8550 that I should have a look at before pulling the trigger?
I can't really comment about stickers... I've never seen a media which worked in the inkjet printers I've tested. I'm told it exists, but all examples I've ever seen, didn't dry properly, or the ink rubbed off... BTW If a retailer reads this and wants some sticker media tested - just give me a call [in the UK]
Very helpful. I generally print gloss photo, but when i can get an a3 printer, might look more at some ^fine art^. However, what puts me 0ff the 18100 most is the possible toller marks on thicker paper. Im also aware that some people also struggling with roller marks on thicker paper with the 8550 as weepll (eg jagos art channel). Surely it not expecting to much to print on 300gsm art paper with no roler marks?, thks mike
Thanks The 18100 is very much a 'glossy pics' printer, but I had no issues with the 8550 See my main [written] review for a lot more about paper selection www.northlight-images.co.uk/epson-et-8550-printer-review/
Hi Keith, I have the ET-8550, and I like to use matt papers, but I am having trouble getting a neutral B&W rendering. There seems to be a color cast to my prints. So far I have used Epson Ultra Premium Presentation Matte, and Epson Velvet Fine Art Paper. I have also tried these papers on my old Epson Stylus Photo R-2400 with better results. It has the A-B&W mode, and I can't seem to find it on my ET-8550. I do have the Velvet Fine Art setting though. I would like to try some of the Epson Legacy Papers, but there doesn't appear to be any settings available for either of my printers. Anyway I would like to find some matte papers that would behave without a slight color cast. I shoot infrared B&W and am looking for rich blacks and desent contrast. Any suggestions for different papers and their profiles? Thanks, Steve
Read the B&W section of the main [written] review www.northlight-images.co.uk/epson-et-8500-printer-review/ Remember that my videos are generally only supplements to my written articles, rarely the other way round! ;-)
Hello. Thanks for the video. Do you know maybe what is the difference between Epson 108 ink used in 18050 (107 in 18100) and Epson 115 Claria ET ink used in 8180 (114 in 8550) which are 50% more expensive? They are the same set I think 6inks with pigment black. Regards from Poland :)
Right on Keith, who says at 10:08: "I'd love to see a big, larger sized, pro level, dye based printer…." C'mon Epson and Canon, please make larger sized dye based printers, since pigment inks are so dull in comparison. These shine!
And Epson, please include grey and light grey inks in your larger, pro level, dye based printer - or even more inks - like with your top-of-the-line pigment ink printers, that have state of the art color gamut. These dye based ink printers can shine!
@@KeithCooper Thanks, Keith! It's worth trying. At the very least, they should build a 17". I'd like to see Canon build larger versions of their Pro-200, using their 8-ink inkset which I've read they improved reds and blacks on with the Pro-200, making it probably state of the art in dye ink printers. Or if Epson did this too, up to 44"! These days, pigment ink prints don't have the pizazz to compete with metal prints printed on dye based printers, that often use only 4 inks, resulting in a poor color gamut. But the people want shine. As you know, but maybe not everyone here, the reflectivity of the metal surface helps project the print through the dye inks, which is understandingly appealing to many, especially because so few light their prints. I personally don't like metal prints, and would like to print on reflective paper with dye inks instead, getting greater color gamut in the process.
Thank you very much! Great review and very helpful! I'm seeking a printer that can produce both B&W and Colour photo prints, and looking to replace my Canon iP8750 as the print head is leaking ink. I guess the ET-8550 may be my best option, or maybe just replace the print head on my Canon!
I don't know the IP8750 - it predates my videos and Canon asking me to test smaller printers. Do check the full 8550 review though for notes on papers and ink choices www.northlight-images.co.uk/epson-et-8550-printer-review/
@@KeithCooper Many thanks Keith. I'm working my way through your 8550 videos at the moment 😀 If I go for the 8550 it will be my first Epson printer since the days of the BBC Micro and an Epson dot matrix that printed out on perforated paper with holes up either side!
Ah - do check the written one too if you've not seen it - my videos are generally meant as supplements to the written articles, not the other way round... Written stuff is much more detailed and has corrections/additions over time - videos are frozen at the time I recorded them [one take - no scripts ;-) ]
Hi Keith, just out of curiosity, how does it compare to the XP-15000 for glossy prints and with respect to gamut? If your covering that in your upcoming review no worries, I can wait. Thanks for the review.
Sorry, the xp15000 review was a quite some time ago so I couldn't say for sure The 15000 is much more like the 8550 in this respect I feel. I don't usually do comparisons, but so many people have asked me about this one, and it's an easy choice.
The xp-15000 printer is different again, with a different ink set and just one black More flexible than the 18100 in what it handles See www.northlight-images.co.uk/epson-xp-15000-printer-review/
Thanks, that's useful to know. I'll happily stick with my 8850s for now I think as I do print some black and white and I'm getting good results. . When an 8850 eventually stops working (possibly when the non user replacable ink pad is full) I'll likely replace with the newer model without the scanner and screen.
May be off topic Good day, im quite new into printing, i have an Epson et8550 and i m experimenting a lot. I try to understand much as i can, from all different point of imaging print. Something what frustrating me a lot is this... Who i can understand if a print is good, very good, bad or present defect?... My answer to this is... Just experience and knowledge can do that.... I feel like a blind man that can not charge himself for an improvment or be proud of myself for the great work. Yes sound strange... I don't know how to charge my print... What's your point of view Enzo
@@KeithCooper yes last year to understand more about printing and my printer i analyses your review step by step. Took a couple of months to go true most of them... And even today... If i have a concern i use your you tube and review as a bible.... Hoping for an improvement or learning tools... Defects as bending i can recognise easily on the print and on the monitor {this means that intentionally i print something bending already display on the monitor just to understand }. May be only time and building experience of course with a lot of mistakes can halp me to charge my job/hobby
Hi dear Keith Thank you so much for all the videos you posted. I've been watching your channel 24/7 for a week now :))) 1 thing in particular that I have in mind is if any of these printers can print on a 9*12 kraft or white rigid envelopes? I saw in the specification of 8550 that we can feed up to 1.3mm from the rear feed, which you also mentioned in your previous video (even we can alter the blue plastic to put a thicker cardstock). However, I couldn't find any resources that I could either feed a not-supported paper dimension (9*12 or 10*13 inch) or print on rigid kraft or white envelopes (coated or uncoated). Is it possible for you to check this and tell me? Any other printer would also be good for me. What I have in mind is to print full-color borderless (except for the last 2cm that 8550 cannot print) on rigid envelopes in bulk for my project (1000 or 2000). The prices of these custom rigid mailers are so high (2.5 to 3$ while the plain one is only 0.5$)
Glad it's of interest! I don't have the printer any more - it was a loan from Epson [I'm not allowed to live in a printer warehouse ;-) ] You should be able to specify custom paper sizes, but forget borderless on non standard sizes. See the main [written] review at: www.northlight-images.co.uk/epson-et-8550-printer-review/ I'm afraid I don't really test this sort of media, so I can't be sure how well it would print
Hi Keith. I bought the Epson ET-8550 two years ago, for these reasons: EcoTank printer/scanner with as much colors as possible, as a family, home office and (semi-professional) photo printer. I was very glad to find your reviews, which gave me an idea of what I can expect. I still need to look at the full review and am interested in a list of compatible papers and their ICC profiles. I currently use the Premium Semigloss Photo Paper A3/A3+. Thank you for all these great videos. Can the scanner be used for profiling?
I want to add some questions and issues I'm struggling with. What is your idea on these? Epson has not yet added its EcoTank printers, like its flagship ET-8550 to the list of compatible printers for any of their own paper types (e.g. Premium Glossy/Semigloss/Matte Photo Paper). Can I use Epson cleaning paper? Officially it's only for some specific printers, but is it? I'm having an issue with not being able to scan (more than one page) "from the scanner". You need to go back and forth between the computer and the scanner for each page you scan, which is ludicrous for a network printer/scanner. I can't ask everyone to use the smartphone app. Do you have a solution? Epson might listen if it comes from you. I print on 10x15 cm prior to print full-size (it lubricates the print heads, isn't it?) and for handouts. The printing however is completely wrong (shifted) on this format. I can't get a picture printed centrally on the paper, whether it's with Photo+ or Lightroom Classic. I've never seen that particular comment from anyone. Is it just me? Have a nice day.
No the scanner cannot be used in any useful way for profiling The 'list' is a marketing construct and as such largely meaningless ;-) The cleaning paper is another marketing related product IMHO - I use copier paper... I just scanned from the computer - no printer input required [see the main [written] review] Not sure about why 'lubricating the print heads' would be something to do? Try printing with Epson Print layout? Photo+ and Lightroom are not tools I'd choose for this [Photoshop is OK though]
@@KeithCooper Thanks for the tips. "... about why 'lubricating the print heads' would be something to do?" When I haven't printed for some time, prior to printing to large paper, I print to small paper to make sure the heads are not dried out. It seems more economical than cleaning the heads.
Thanks - I'd suggest that using the printer nozzle check is usually OK - on an A4 sheet you can re-use it to get several on the one sheet... But a small print is fine...
Hi Keith, Thanks for this wonderful comparison, I bought my brand new Ecotank ET-8550 after watching this I have a question about ET-8550 would it be okay if I add all Ecotank ET-8550 compatible pigment inks from 3rd party manufacturers in a brand new Et-8550 printer instead of 5 dye inks that we get. I got a set of an all pigment ink with small ink droplet size to avoid clogging but wanted to confirm with you before going ahead. Thankyou so much for your videos.
I've never tried it, so I cannot offer any info as to its reliability. I know people use dye sub inks and the like in such printers, but obviously any non standard ink kills any warranty. The only issue is that you would have to make all new icc profiles for your inks - if you were not going to, then what purpose did the swap to pigment have? ;-)
@@KeithCooper Thankyou for your response, so then I will add the pigment inks and add ICC profile setting as per. I believe the risk associated due to void warranty is high initially but the more successful prints I get the better it will become. And I think that risk I would have to take. Really appreciate your videos. Would love to see a video series on the topic of how to become better at printing overall and get more knowledge about the types of papers, what properties of the paper matters, what paper for what job, how to select and buy ink papers etc. Difference between dye ink pigment ink etc. Such a video series would be beneficial to everyone buying a printer for hobby or professional reasons.
@@andersphansson Hi yes i did and its working great, I added pigment ink to the new printer, if you want to use it you might have to clean your dye ink from the tank before.
Is the 18100 much better for printing color photos on glossy and satin paper than the 8550? Here their prices almost the same, but the 8550 has lots of extra features, so for me looks like the latter is the winner, but I want to use the printer for printing almost only color photos on glossy, semi-glossy paper and I am afraid of the poorer ink selection of the 8550.
The 8550 would be my choice - the range of workable papers on the 18100 makes it far too specialised for my liking. In truth the differences between inks are simply never going to be noticed by most people - especially if you print with good profiles See my main [written] 8550 review for a lot more about just how to get the best from it www.northlight-images.co.uk/epson-et-8550-printer-review/
Hi Keith, great review as usual. I am looking at replacing my old P3800 and my ET-7700 (worst family printer purchase ever) by a single device. On the P3800 I mainly use Luster papers like Epson Premium Luster, and Ilford Smooth Pearl. Would the ET8550 be a match for the P3800 when it comes to luster?
Thanks. The gamut of the 8550 as a dye printer will be somewhat less than the pigments of the SP3800, but with good profiling it can give excellent results. The dyes of the 8550 will show much less gloss differential or bronzing
Hi Keith, thanks for the reviews, could you tell me if the ET-18100 could take canvas media for occasional prints, also could you tell me what scanning software you use, my epson scanner has stopped working properly since windows updates were installed some time ago, THANKS
Hi Keith, thank you for your insightful videos. Would you recommend the epson 4850? I am looking for a printer for cake toppers. Any advice or suggestions would be much appreciated x thank you
That's not a model I know at all I'm afraid I have reviewed the 2850 - you'll have to see how the inks match up between the two in the specs www.northlight-images.co.uk/epson-et-2850-printer-review/
Hello Keith, I print custom cards on glossy holographic paper, would you think the 18100 would be great for me, I would like to put black sublimation ink so the printer will not mix color..thanks in advance ☺️
No idea about alternative inks I'm afraid - my concern would be marking of thicker media - see the main written review www.northlight-images.co.uk/epson-et-18100-printer-review/
@@KeithCooper thanks for the quick reply, yes I’ve seen on your video the marking it can leave on thicker media, right now I have an et-2850 and it leave some mark on my paper, I resolved by spacing the cards I print, so the mark its on the wasted paper, did it leave so much more mark?
See the written review not the videos - my videos are always just supplements if there is a main 'written' one ;-) The 18100 is the worst I've tested in this respect - could be a bad one, but take care
Looking at the 8550 amd this was a really helpful video. The glossy prints on the other option look superb but the general use case across different mediums of the 8550 judt ticks off more boxes for me. Csn you recommend any good close to glossy paper products for the 8850 please. Ive been a retoucher for 16 years but the printing world has scared but finally im fed up with a lack of good printing services for my basic needs and have decided to purchase this printer. Especially now that the ink system is refillable. Another question. Would you recommend buying a 5 year waranty for this printer from epson. Ive seen it available for maybe £165 (in danish krone) i think its a no brainer as ive seen so many printers go into ewaste.
For glossy - see the papers tested in the two main [written] reviews at: www.northlight-images.co.uk/epson-et-8550-printer-review/ and www.northlight-images.co.uk/epson-et-8500-printer-review/
Much appreciated Keith, excellent videos. Here is a tidbit to give you even more views, the Middle East / India model name is L8160 for the A4 model (no A3+) and you correctly identified the alternative names for the other printers (L18050..)
Great review! I'm considering displaying it in a shop located in a tourist village where we print photos for guests, considering the affordable maintenance costs. Currently, we use a Canon Pixma printer with dye inks and print on a 300g Marrutt Ultrapearlescent paper, which is semi-glossy. Would the suggested paper be a suitable replacement? Should I go for a glossy paper weighing 265g instead? Thank you, greetings from Italy.
I suspect lighter papers will win out, but it's going to be very dependent on the actual paper and thickness - no marks whatsoever on Epson PGPP [on the printer I tested with}
Hi Keith, I see you have two printers I’m looking at buying but struggling to choose as I can’t see a side-by-side comparison. Which produces better photo quality: the Et-8550 or Canon Pixma-200? Thank you
Ah, I have a lot of printers pass through the house ;-) No simple answer - different inksets It's why I so rarely do side by side comparisons - they can easily be meaningless... Depends on paper choices for example. See the actual reviews www.northlight-images.co.uk/epson-et-8550-printer-review/ www.northlight-images.co.uk/canon-pro-200-printer-review/
Hi Keith! Thanks so much for your videos 🙏. After hours at looking at them, I finaly bought the Epson ET-8550. Can you help me? In Photoshop I made a file 8.5 X 11 inches. In it, there is a picture of 7 X 10 inches. The guide lines and ruler indicate it is really 7 X 10. But when I print on the actual 8.5 X 11 paper, the picture is 6.75 inches instead of 7 inches 🤔. I tried different options and they are not working. Thanks ahead for your help!
Print with Epson print layout and specify the print size - you can specify either the margin or print size. You don't need a border - just print the actual image from a 7x10 canvas
@@KeithCooper Thanks Keith for answering so quickly. I did choose in the printer properties the document format 8,5 x 11 inches. I also choose for the paper output 8,5 x 11 as well. I tried "no margins" and also the contrary, but there is does not work either.
Thank you Keith! Such an informative video, however I still can't decide between these two for printing family photos mainly. Also, can you please tell me if the l8050 is the A4 version of the et-18100 (l18050)? Or is it a different printer? These model names confuse me a lot
I'm afraid I don't know - you need to compare the listed specs. It's a model I've never seen Simple choice - just glossy photos or glossy/matte with a scanner
@@KeithCooper thank you, the reason why I can't decide is that you said et-18100 does the glossy photo print better than et-8550. Glossy photo printing is the main reason I'm planning to buy a printer like these, but I like the other features of the et-8550. Is glossy print quality that much better or for non professional eyes the et-8550 will be enough? I'm looking forward for you opinion.
One is better, it doesn't mean the other is bad... ;-) Now you see why I so rarely ever do product comparisons ;-) With good profiles, the 8550 is fine - most people will not notice a difference unless it's pointed out to them, and even then half won't see it. The 18100 is just very good on some papers If I wanted one of these printers [I don't - I've got bigger ones!], I'd pick the 8550 myself for versatility
Near future - not a chance I'd suspect If you look at the size of the ink carts in the P5000 and upwards (canon PRO-2100 and up) then they are already quite large - perhaps a swap to ink 'bags' rather than carts (I've seen it in some of Epson's bigger production printers) I wouldn't expect any change to the P5000 (or Canon PRO-1000) this year at all...
@@KeithCooper It's a shame because the A2 size is already very interesting to display, but the cost in ink and the printer itself are too high for me. Especially the ink is very expensive. Thanks for your opinion.
Hey Keith, I bought the epson-et18100 and I was very satisfied with the print quality, this morning one of my sheet got jammed inside my paper, she removed it by herself, now it’s leaving black marks everywhere, and the print head are touching against my paper, do you know any solution to this?
What kind of glossy papers do you use? Are there any that arent sticky and moreso like cvs glossy photo paper? Or anything like shutterflys matte photo paper.
None of them are 'sticky'. I've tested several [the full list will be in the written review] Epson PGPP works well Never heard of 'shutterfly' or cvs I'm afraid [I'm in the Uk]
Difficult to say - I reviewed the XP-960 back in 2016 www.northlight-images.co.uk/epson-expression-photo-xp-960-printer-review/ Long before someone at Canon convinced me to start adding the little videos to my reviews ;-)
Hi, can you help me please? Which one is suitable for matte coated photo papers (I print deep dark background graphics and light detailed watercolor graphics too, but I only use matte inkjet photo paper). Are the prints waterproof / drip-proof? (I am currently using the L3250 printer (this ink is 103 - waterproof), I want the same quality in A3+ size.) Thank you for your reply.
Nothing I've tested is properly waterproof - the inks are not really made for that. Some media may be better. It's not a feature I normally test in any way. However - See my TC-20M review for the testing of a synthetic paper, and washing a print ua-cam.com/video/UtqahFm4czY/v-deo.html
@@KeithCooper Can you tell meg which printer is better for matte coated photo papers (I print deep dark background graphics and light detailed watercolor graphics too, but I only use matte inkjet photo paper)?
if i wanted to use this printer for doing things such as invitations etc would the et-8550 suit that role better or are there any other printers better for this.
The 18100 does not handle thicker media as well, so the 8550 is better in this respect. As to more suitable to your needs?... quite possible, but all come with trade-offs. The Canon PRO-200 has better paper handling, but not ink tanks, so pricier ink
@@KeithCooper sorry, I just wanted to know your opinion regarding the possibility of printing digital negatives (internegatives) for contact prints, with one of these printers. as permajet translucent inkjet film suited for creating digital negatives for darkroom use. thank you for everything you share
I didn't test this in any detail, so whilst I'd expect both printers to work with the right film, I don't know what the density would be like for negatives, or whether the 'pizza wheel' marks might be an issue. This is one to ask on a specialist alt-process forum
Not really - see the ones I tried in the main [written] review - these are ones I've made profiles for See too the info about media settings - this is very important for matte media www.northlight-images.co.uk/epson-et-8550-printer-review/
Two quite different printers aimed at different markets Read the actual reviews? www.northlight-images.co.uk/canon-pro-200-printer-review/ www.northlight-images.co.uk/epson-et-8550-printer-review/
@@KeithCooper Yes I know - I did. There isn’t a head to head and trying to compare print quality for photo prints. From what I read I’m leaning towards the 200, but just making sure I didn’t misunderstand
Ah, I do very few 'head to head' comparisons [this is in 20+ years of reviews] The problem is that what matters is different to everyone who ever asks, and likely different to me. Essentially meaningless, and that's before we even approach the issue of what print 'quality' means ;-) All too often, I'm minded to suggest, people just use them to justify their existing preference - I don't sell printers, so I'm not into that... ;-) :-) But... The 200 has somewhat better paper handling, but is much more expensive to run. Print 'quality' - more dependent on user expertise and profile quality than any inherent differences. If I did my best print on each, few people could spot the difference... ;-)
Against the 10 year old PRO-100? [2014 review] www.northlight-images.co.uk/canon-pixma-pro-100-printer-review/ Better for colour glossy/lustre prints Worse for thicker papers/art-papers/black and white Vastly cheaper for ink costs The PRO-200 is a distinct improvement on the PRO-100 in terms of usability
It was the 18100 I was referring to - the 8550 is a much more capable general purpose printer, from a range of media and usability POV - the hybrid ink set is what makes for an interesting printer.
@@KeithCooper I have the CANON-PRO100, and it always blows me away with its quality. I’m using it with Precision Colors. I asked because I am wondering if it’s worth the upgrade to the 18100 or PRO200.
I've never seen a fibre based metallic paper... ;-) It will depend on thickness and how easily it takes marks - if you find one I'm not betting too much on it working well...
Sorry - no... That's why my videos are always secondary to my detailed written review articles, they get checked, updated, refined over time YT videos will contain verbal typos - once published, they are set in stone :-( All my videos are unscripted, and should have E&EO added to the credits...
Irrelevant if I'm looking for a photo printer Maybe if I just want a document printer - given I review printers for printing photos/art/cards/canvas etc, the laser is trailing a long way down the list...
Another irrelevance if I want to print photos, art, cards etc This video is absolutely not concerned with use as an office printer. If you want an office printer, look amongst the wide range office printers...
Taking your articles into consideration with my needs (B&W, mainly matte) i'd choose 8550. Respect to your efforts and perfectly readible website. The only doubt is that maybe pigment printer would be better. As 8550 costs my 3 week incomes, I cannot take two..
The benefits of pigments and/or disadvantages of dyes can easily be overstated ;-) For many, the benefits of not worrying about ink costs and the freedom to experiment can be more important?
The L18050 is a European model number for what is the ET-18100 in the UK and some other regions As yet, this printer does not appear on any Epson US site I've seen?
What a great review. I think most reviewers would have quit and named the 8550 the winner before they found where the 18100 excelled. Nice work, man! You're the best!
Thanks!
Sometimes I do take it as a bit of a challenge ;-)
Thank you for the comparison. That made very clear that I can not expect what I would from the 18100. I'll be looking at the 8550.
Glad it helped
@@KeithCooper He helped me make the same decision, mainly because I want to print on some art papers.
Just stopping by to say thank you very much for this quick, thorough and calming review! It was a pleasure listening to your impressions and made it very clear for me to get the 8550 since I rely on using different media all the time.
Thanks
Nice comparison Keith…for me the 8550 is far more versatile. My results with B&W printing are very good… Very easy to use. Cheers..
Thanks - the 18100 is in the category of doing the 'one thing' very well.
Hi Keith, Im very happy to report that my ET8550 has the range with various photo papers and i am willing to take the very small hit on quality in high gloss prints particularly as i learn more. Oh and i thought the prints on metallic gloss papers that ET8550 produced were very good.
Having more range in media settings and paper choices that the et8550 has, was the reason for my choice and i am extremely happy about it👍
yes, the flexibility is what would mean I'd likely get an 8550.
I just don't need super glossy very often
@mipmipmipmipmip The Epson Et8550 is way more and beyond ones expectations, an exceptional printer when getting to grips with it. OEM Ink costs are of no concern either, beating everything hands down.
its a winner in every department especially for someone like myself who just wants that extra control in printing in a digital world👍
@@markflanagan521I was looking to buy the 18100 but it looks like it’s not available to purchase in the US. I do like that the 8550 is very versatile. My wife wants it print photos from her iPhone onto picture paper. Have you done that on yours? I’ve also heard some people use pigment dye on this machine for a more a longer lasting photo. Have you tried any aftermarket dye?
@@DeestedFirstly I would stick with the Epson ink set(cheap to replace and excellent) as it is made for the printer and I have had no issues with clogging or smearing even when not used for a few weeks.
Secondly, yes I have printed some iPhone photos for family and the results were very good even from smaller 1MB files with a simple bit of editing. A larger file would be better still. The modern iPhone can produce
larger files so it will be more than capable of producing excellent image quality, far superior to any run of the mill photo labs.
That gloss black wow, take my money please! Thanks Keith - you’re a legend!
Thanks!
Another great review. I’m getting an 8550. I need
the home office features and don’t have space to keep my current Canon all-in-one and a second photo printer. I also plan to print from scanned B&W negatives as well as digital color. It’s the best compromise for me.
Yes - couldn't disagree there
@ another question on profiling - is it possible to profile/calibrate the printer by scanning a standard target, printing the scanned image, scanning the print, and comparing it to the original? This analysis could be done with software and if it could be done on Epson’s cloud servers they would get valuable data on that could benefit all of us.
@@Anonymous-mf8ii Not with a normal scanner like on the 8550.
The scanner records 3 ill defined r/g/b channels - this doesn't give enough spectral information to build an icc profile.
I'm sure this could be utilised in some way, but the main issue is that no printer which would be worthy of the effort/investment [from Epson's POV] would ever come with a scanner...
I do look a scanner profiling in the main 8550 review - a good enough quality target is not cheap though...
Hi Keith. I have an Epson SureColor SC P600. I use it for printing archival reports of historic buildings (in Australia). I chose it because it is a pigment ink printer and that's what the specifications call for. I know dye inks have improved a lot over recent years, but they are known to be not as light fast as pigment inks. (not that any of these reports would ever see the light of day after they have been submitted). My printer is not used a lot, it is expensive to run and I have a constant battle keeping the head clog free. The shared black ink line is a horrible thing.
I really want to get an EcoTank printer but the only A3 one with a full pigment ink set is the ET-16600, which is not known to be good at printing photos (although I have never seen a print from it). I am pretty keen on the ET-8550, if I can get them to change their mind about submitting reports on dye ink. Do you think this ink with a good fixative would be fairly stable? The photos don't need to be gallery grade, just clear.
I wouldn't say there are 'hidden' reports, go to www.wilhelm-research.com for example - there is a lot of data there...Such testing takes a while.
Have a look at my main [written] review for a discussion about the 8550 inkset
www.northlight-images.co.uk/epson-et-8550-printer-review/
For archival use though, in an application where it's specified, then the P700 or P900 is what will be needed - no black ink switch. Note that the P700 is a smaller version of the P900, which is next on from the P800.
The P700 is not so much a new version of the P600
Very, very helpful. I am 100% after a printer for photo-printing only, so this is very relevant. I could have never read this info on an Epson website or something. Cheers!
Thanks - If you've not seen it, there's quite a bit of extra detail in the main [written] review
www.northlight-images.co.uk/epson-et-18100-printer-review/
Great review! I've been thinking of getting a printer upgrade, and based on your review, I'm leaning towards the ET-8550 for art prints and posters. Unfortunately the printer model is not available for sale in my country, and although I could purchase one online, the delivery fees are a tad pricey. The L18050 and its respective inks are available in my country though, and it seems like a solid option, but it's more geared towards photo prints :/
Glad it was of interest!
@@KeithCooper decided to purchase the L18050. Can't wait for it to arrive soon!
Thanks so much for these videos. I’m now a very happy ET-8550 owner 😊
Thanks!
Once again a very interesting video, and this orchid print is truly spectacular. Very curious about that ID print option!
Thanks - with the right paper it's an impressive printer
I don't know of any others which do the cards at the moment. They are quite robust but intended for relatively temporary use [conferences and the like]
Great work Keith, given both printers are about the same price it really does help to understand exactly what use case each one is designed for. I'm still undecided which way to go however lol 🤪
Thanks!
Hi Keith i changed my XP 8500 ( i think its the Expression Photo Printer 4 cartridges ) for the ET-8550 , I do like to print a variety of colour pictures and photo's. the XP 8500 did do a great job on Photo Prints ( if you used the correct profiles for the paper your using ) and i was happy for a while with that printer. I decided i wanted a printer that used 6 colours and an Ecotank and after a lot of googling and watching reviews decided on the ET-8550 ( a lot more pricey than most i looked at ), i wasn't expecting the difference in the photo prints to be so far apart, The ET-8550 prints without any profiles was a lot better than the XP 8500 with profiles. I know some people will say its because it uses 6 inks instead of 4 but the difference is the ET 8500 is 5 dye inks and 1 pigment where as the XP was 4 pigment inks so if i'm correct the ET 8500 only uses 1 more ink when printing over the XP 8500 which should not make a huge difference, When i used a profile for the type of paper on the ET 8550 the difference was even greater. i would say if your looking for an all round printer then the ET-8550 is worth considering as with this printer it will do a lot more than just Photo's. All in all at the moment i'm very happy with the print quality of my ET-8550 and even though its a little pricey i still think it was worth the upgrade.
Yes - for a general purpose printer, the 8550 is a solid choice.
BTW If you've not seen it, I have a lot more info [and videos] about the 8550 in the main [written] review www.northlight-images.co.uk/epson-et-8550-printer-review/
This is how you review a product. Thanks🙏🏻
Thanks - Glad it was helpful!
Thank you so much, this comparison was super useful!
Glad it was helpful!
Thanks for the comparison. I still think the versatility (and the pigment black) of the 8550 makes it the better choice for me.
But I wonder why the ink prices are so different. For example the same amount of yellow cost 40% less for the ET18100 than the ET8550. The bottles have the same capacity and look identical, but I supposed they are mechanically incompatible, aren't they?
Thanks - I don't know about the bottle fittings I'm afraid
Hi Keith,
Thanks for the very helpful review - answering a lot of my questions.
...if I could make a suggestion...
I got really quite frustrated in trying to be sure which printer was which - originally assuming the two screens were showing the two different models, which got me further confused as you spoke of "this one" and "that one".
A simple post-it style sign would be really useful to help the 'easily confused' like me! 😆
Thanks again for your insights 🙏
...just ordered the ET-8550👍
Thanks again 🙏
Thanks - noted
I'd just note that these videos are supplements to the actual written reviews.
In fact this entire channel was created originally at the behest of someone from Canon who thought that my written stuff deserved a wider audience - I didn't believe them - they were right!
See:
www.northlight-images.co.uk/epson-et-8550-printer-review/
www.northlight-images.co.uk/epson-et-18100-printer-review/
Personally, I still don't care to watch much photography related stuff on UA-cam - but they convinced me I was an outlier in that respect :-)
@@KeithCooper
Ha! ...I'm glad they convinced you!
I find YT video reviews very useful, and since YT is my version of TV, it's usually my first stop.
Thanks for the links, I'll definately have a look, as I'm setting up the 8550 this weekend.
All the best 🙏
Hi Keith, thank you once more for this video (we like comparisons).
Glad to help ;-)
Thanks for the tip... my choice probably 8550. Cheers!
Yes, I'd pick it every time...
Im autistic and mainly got a printer (et-2400) to save money on printing pictures of a character, close up of RK900 in Detroit: Become Humans' gallery, and occasionally other things, such as pets. I've been trying to work up to getting the et-8500 or et-8550, but haven't had the money.
These pictures are pretty much alive to me and are very important and I'd like them to be as good and as accurate as possible, just as the screenshot was taken. The 2400 has been doing really great. Ultra Premium/Premium Presentation Matte paper seems to be the best paper and most accurate to the picture. The glossy is also weirdly sticky and I carry these pictures around and everything. I usually laminate them, though. And not to mention the glossy is more expensive, so I've stuck with Matte.
I just saw an article pop up about this printer and figured it was new, so now I have to see which one is better for me to get now.
Edit: typos and:
I think the 8550 would still be my goal.
Unfortunately, the 18100 does not yet seem to be available in the US
The 2400 inks may not be compatible with some gloss media [not a printer I've tested though]
Thanks, Mr. Keith!!
Glad it was of interest.
I have seen a UA-cam video that shows you can get good BW results from a custom profile for the 8550. I think that is the one for me for Art prints around the house and perhaps to sell. I would like to print postcards too.
Yes, custom profiles are one approach...
BUT you also have the option of using the ABW print mode in the driver.
I've, actually covered a lot of this [with the associated technical stuff] in the main written review and B&W video
www.northlight-images.co.uk/epson-et-8550-printer-review/
From the review:
"In all examples I tried, the ABW mode of the printer driver was superior to printing using either Epson’s or my own ICC profiles"
I'll have to return to this since I keep seeing people suggest profiles for the 8550, which generally are not the best approach if you value good B&W prints.
The 18100 [as noted in the review] is simply not that great for B&W
www.northlight-images.co.uk/epson-et-18100-printer-review/
Thank you for an excellent comparison. I am almost set on the 8550 now. Are there any others like the 8550 that I should have a look at before pulling the trigger?
Not that I know of - it's the only one of its sort to handle the range of media/size
See www.northlight-images.co.uk/epson-et-8550-printer-review/
I appreciate very much your your research, thank's a lot!
Glad it's of interest!
thanks for the review Keith. im still hesitating, I want to print color photos but also stickers. which one would suit best you think?
I can't really comment about stickers... I've never seen a media which worked in the inkjet printers I've tested.
I'm told it exists, but all examples I've ever seen, didn't dry properly, or the ink rubbed off...
BTW If a retailer reads this and wants some sticker media tested - just give me a call [in the UK]
This helps with my printer choice thanks
Excellent - glad to help
Nice review. Very helpful.
Thanks, glad it was of interest
Very helpful. I generally print gloss photo, but when i can get an a3 printer, might look more at some ^fine art^. However, what puts me 0ff the 18100 most is the possible toller marks on thicker paper. Im also aware that some people also struggling with roller marks on thicker paper with the 8550 as weepll (eg jagos art channel). Surely it not expecting to much to print on 300gsm art paper with no roler marks?, thks mike
Thanks
The 18100 is very much a 'glossy pics' printer, but I had no issues with the 8550
See my main [written] review for a lot more about paper selection
www.northlight-images.co.uk/epson-et-8550-printer-review/
Good comparison video Keith
Thanks
Hi Keith, I have the ET-8550, and I like to use matt papers, but I am having trouble getting a neutral B&W rendering. There seems to be a color cast to my prints. So far I have used Epson Ultra Premium Presentation Matte, and Epson Velvet Fine Art Paper. I have also tried these papers on my old Epson Stylus Photo R-2400 with better results. It has the A-B&W mode, and I can't seem to find it on my ET-8550. I do have the Velvet Fine Art setting though. I would like to try some of the Epson Legacy Papers, but there doesn't appear to be any settings available for either of my printers. Anyway I would like to find some matte papers that would behave without a slight color cast. I shoot infrared B&W and am looking for rich blacks and desent contrast. Any suggestions for different papers and their profiles? Thanks, Steve
Read the B&W section of the main [written] review
www.northlight-images.co.uk/epson-et-8500-printer-review/
Remember that my videos are generally only supplements to my written articles, rarely the other way round! ;-)
Hello. Thanks for the video. Do you know maybe what is the difference between Epson 108 ink used in 18050 (107 in 18100) and Epson 115 Claria ET ink used in 8180 (114 in 8550) which are 50% more expensive? They are the same set I think 6inks with pigment black. Regards from Poland :)
Sorry I don't know
This is the place to ask
www.printerknowledge.com
Right on Keith, who says at 10:08: "I'd love to see a big, larger sized, pro level, dye based printer…."
C'mon Epson and Canon, please make larger sized dye based printers, since pigment inks are so dull in comparison. These shine!
And Epson, please include grey and light grey inks in your larger, pro level, dye based printer - or even more inks - like with your top-of-the-line pigment ink printers, that have state of the art color gamut. These dye based ink printers can shine!
My requests have been made, in the past, and I'll ask again, but decisions on this are made far far away...
@@KeithCooper Thanks, Keith! It's worth trying. At the very least, they should build a 17". I'd like to see Canon build larger versions of their Pro-200, using their 8-ink inkset which I've read they improved reds and blacks on with the Pro-200, making it probably state of the art in dye ink printers.
Or if Epson did this too, up to 44"!
These days, pigment ink prints don't have the pizazz to compete with metal prints printed on dye based printers, that often use only 4 inks, resulting in a poor color gamut. But the people want shine.
As you know, but maybe not everyone here, the reflectivity of the metal surface helps project the print through the dye inks, which is understandingly appealing to many, especially because so few light their prints.
I personally don't like metal prints, and would like to print on reflective paper with dye inks instead, getting greater color gamut in the process.
keith, thanks so much for this, exactly what i needed.
Thanks - this is one of the easier comparisons to do given how the 18100 works ;-)
excellent presentation.
Thanks!
Thank you very much! Great review and very helpful! I'm seeking a printer that can produce both B&W and Colour photo prints, and looking to replace my Canon iP8750 as the print head is leaking ink. I guess the ET-8550 may be my best option, or maybe just replace the print head on my Canon!
I don't know the IP8750 - it predates my videos and Canon asking me to test smaller printers.
Do check the full 8550 review though for notes on papers and ink choices
www.northlight-images.co.uk/epson-et-8550-printer-review/
@@KeithCooper Many thanks Keith. I'm working my way through your 8550 videos at the moment 😀 If I go for the 8550 it will be my first Epson printer since the days of the BBC Micro and an Epson dot matrix that printed out on perforated paper with holes up either side!
Ah - do check the written one too if you've not seen it - my videos are generally meant as supplements to the written articles, not the other way round...
Written stuff is much more detailed and has corrections/additions over time - videos are frozen at the time I recorded them [one take - no scripts ;-) ]
@@KeithCooper 👍
Hi Keith, just out of curiosity, how does it compare to the XP-15000 for glossy prints and with respect to gamut? If your covering that in your upcoming review no worries, I can wait.
Thanks for the review.
Sorry, the xp15000 review was a quite some time ago so I couldn't say for sure
The 15000 is much more like the 8550 in this respect I feel.
I don't usually do comparisons, but so many people have asked me about this one, and it's an easy choice.
I was wondering the same thing. They seem very similar on paper but the XT-15000 is £400 cheaper. It's a lot of ink!
The xp-15000 printer is different again, with a different ink set and just one black
More flexible than the 18100 in what it handles
See
www.northlight-images.co.uk/epson-xp-15000-printer-review/
@@KeithCooper thanks Keith!
Thanks, that's useful to know. I'll happily stick with my 8850s for now I think as I do print some black and white and I'm getting good results. . When an 8850 eventually stops working (possibly when the non user replacable ink pad is full) I'll likely replace with the newer model without the scanner and screen.
Yes, as long as you don't want to do much B&W or print on thicker media/cards
The 8550 has user replaceable ink pad ( maintenance cartridge)
@@fangzhou3235maintenance cartridges and ink pads are not the same unfortunately.
May be off topic
Good day, im quite new into printing, i have an Epson et8550 and i m experimenting a lot. I try to understand much as i can, from all different point of imaging print.
Something what frustrating me a lot is this... Who i can understand if a print is good, very good, bad or present defect?... My answer to this is... Just experience and knowledge can do that.... I feel like a blind man that can not charge himself for an improvment or be proud of myself for the great work.
Yes sound strange... I don't know how to charge my print...
What's your point of view
Enzo
Have a read of the main [written] 8550 review
www.northlight-images.co.uk/epson-et-8550-printer-review/
I always start with a known good test image
@@KeithCooper yes last year to understand more about printing and my printer i analyses your review step by step. Took a couple of months to go true most of them... And even today... If i have a concern i use your you tube and review as a bible.... Hoping for an improvement or learning tools... Defects as bending i can recognise easily on the print and on the monitor {this means that intentionally i print something bending already display on the monitor just to understand }.
May be only time and building experience of course with a lot of mistakes can halp me to charge my job/hobby
Hi Keith! Hiw was it, compared to canon pro 200?
Almost identical - but I'll do a 200 one as well
Hi dear Keith
Thank you so much for all the videos you posted. I've been watching your channel 24/7 for a week now :)))
1 thing in particular that I have in mind is if any of these printers can print on a 9*12 kraft or white rigid envelopes?
I saw in the specification of 8550 that we can feed up to 1.3mm from the rear feed, which you also mentioned in your previous video (even we can alter the blue plastic to put a thicker cardstock). However, I couldn't find any resources that I could either feed a not-supported paper dimension (9*12 or 10*13 inch) or print on rigid kraft or white envelopes (coated or uncoated).
Is it possible for you to check this and tell me?
Any other printer would also be good for me.
What I have in mind is to print full-color borderless (except for the last 2cm that 8550 cannot print) on rigid envelopes in bulk for my project (1000 or 2000).
The prices of these custom rigid mailers are so high (2.5 to 3$ while the plain one is only 0.5$)
Glad it's of interest!
I don't have the printer any more - it was a loan from Epson [I'm not allowed to live in a printer warehouse ;-) ]
You should be able to specify custom paper sizes, but forget borderless on non standard sizes.
See the main [written] review at:
www.northlight-images.co.uk/epson-et-8550-printer-review/
I'm afraid I don't really test this sort of media, so I can't be sure how well it would print
thank you so much!@@KeithCooper
it was a great help :)
have a great day
Hi Keith. I bought the Epson ET-8550 two years ago, for these reasons: EcoTank printer/scanner with as much colors as possible, as a family, home office and (semi-professional) photo printer. I was very glad to find your reviews, which gave me an idea of what I can expect. I still need to look at the full review and am interested in a list of compatible papers and their ICC profiles. I currently use the Premium Semigloss Photo Paper A3/A3+. Thank you for all these great videos.
Can the scanner be used for profiling?
I want to add some questions and issues I'm struggling with. What is your idea on these?
Epson has not yet added its EcoTank printers, like its flagship ET-8550 to the list of compatible printers for any of their own paper types (e.g. Premium Glossy/Semigloss/Matte Photo Paper).
Can I use Epson cleaning paper? Officially it's only for some specific printers, but is it?
I'm having an issue with not being able to scan (more than one page) "from the scanner". You need to go back and forth between the computer and the scanner for each page you scan, which is ludicrous for a network printer/scanner. I can't ask everyone to use the smartphone app. Do you have a solution? Epson might listen if it comes from you.
I print on 10x15 cm prior to print full-size (it lubricates the print heads, isn't it?) and for handouts. The printing however is completely wrong (shifted) on this format. I can't get a picture printed centrally on the paper, whether it's with Photo+ or Lightroom Classic. I've never seen that particular comment from anyone. Is it just me?
Have a nice day.
No the scanner cannot be used in any useful way for profiling
The 'list' is a marketing construct and as such largely meaningless ;-)
The cleaning paper is another marketing related product IMHO - I use copier paper...
I just scanned from the computer - no printer input required [see the main [written] review]
Not sure about why 'lubricating the print heads' would be something to do?
Try printing with Epson Print layout? Photo+ and Lightroom are not tools I'd choose for this [Photoshop is OK though]
@@KeithCooper Thanks for the tips.
"... about why 'lubricating the print heads' would be something to do?" When I haven't printed for some time, prior to printing to large paper, I print to small paper to make sure the heads are not dried out. It seems more economical than cleaning the heads.
Thanks - I'd suggest that using the printer nozzle check is usually OK - on an A4 sheet you can re-use it to get several on the one sheet...
But a small print is fine...
Hi Keith, Thanks for this wonderful comparison, I bought my brand new Ecotank ET-8550 after watching this I have a question about ET-8550 would it be okay if I add all Ecotank ET-8550 compatible pigment inks from 3rd party manufacturers in a brand new Et-8550 printer instead of 5 dye inks that we get. I got a set of an all pigment ink with small ink droplet size to avoid clogging but wanted to confirm with you before going ahead. Thankyou so much for your videos.
I've never tried it, so I cannot offer any info as to its reliability.
I know people use dye sub inks and the like in such printers, but obviously any non standard ink kills any warranty.
The only issue is that you would have to make all new icc profiles for your inks - if you were not going to, then what purpose did the swap to pigment have? ;-)
@@KeithCooper Thankyou for your response, so then I will add the pigment inks and add ICC profile setting as per. I believe the risk associated due to void warranty is high initially but the more successful prints I get the better it will become. And I think that risk I would have to take. Really appreciate your videos. Would love to see a video series on the topic of how to become better at printing overall and get more knowledge about the types of papers, what properties of the paper matters, what paper for what job, how to select and buy ink papers etc. Difference between dye ink pigment ink etc. Such a video series would be beneficial to everyone buying a printer for hobby or professional reasons.
@@whamjampamhamhave you used pigment ink with your 8550? Result?
@@andersphansson Hi yes i did and its working great, I added pigment ink to the new printer, if you want to use it you might have to clean your dye ink from the tank before.
thank you, very informative, which printer would you recommend for dye sublimation/heat transfer printing?
A proper dye sub printer like the Epson F2200 or the new F1000
Is the 18100 much better for printing color photos on glossy and satin paper than the 8550? Here their prices almost the same, but the 8550 has lots of extra features, so for me looks like the latter is the winner, but I want to use the printer for printing almost only color photos on glossy, semi-glossy paper and I am afraid of the poorer ink selection of the 8550.
The 8550 would be my choice - the range of workable papers on the 18100 makes it far too specialised for my liking.
In truth the differences between inks are simply never going to be noticed by most people - especially if you print with good profiles
See my main [written] 8550 review for a lot more about just how to get the best from it
www.northlight-images.co.uk/epson-et-8550-printer-review/
Hi Keith, great review as usual. I am looking at replacing my old P3800 and my ET-7700 (worst family printer purchase ever) by a single device. On the P3800 I mainly use Luster papers like Epson Premium Luster, and Ilford Smooth Pearl. Would the ET8550 be a match for the P3800 when it comes to luster?
Thanks. The gamut of the 8550 as a dye printer will be somewhat less than the pigments of the SP3800, but with good profiling it can give excellent results. The dyes of the 8550 will show much less gloss differential or bronzing
Hi Keith, thanks for the reviews, could you tell me if the ET-18100 could take canvas media for occasional prints, also could you tell me what scanning software you use, my epson scanner has stopped working properly since windows updates were installed some time ago, THANKS
It might - see the main review though
www.northlight-images.co.uk/epson-et-18100-printer-review/
I use Vuescan
Hi Keith, thank you for your insightful videos. Would you recommend the epson 4850? I am looking for a printer for cake toppers. Any advice or suggestions would be much appreciated x thank you
That's not a model I know at all I'm afraid
I have reviewed the 2850 - you'll have to see how the inks match up between the two in the specs
www.northlight-images.co.uk/epson-et-2850-printer-review/
Hello Keith, I print custom cards on glossy holographic paper, would you think the 18100 would be great for me, I would like to put black sublimation ink so the printer will not mix color..thanks in advance ☺️
No idea about alternative inks I'm afraid - my concern would be marking of thicker media - see the main written review
www.northlight-images.co.uk/epson-et-18100-printer-review/
@@KeithCooper thanks for the quick reply, yes I’ve seen on your video the marking it can leave on thicker media, right now I have an et-2850 and it leave some mark on my paper, I resolved by spacing the cards I print, so the mark its on the wasted paper, did it leave so much more mark?
See the written review not the videos - my videos are always just supplements if there is a main 'written' one ;-)
The 18100 is the worst I've tested in this respect - could be a bad one, but take care
Looking at the 8550 amd this was a really helpful video. The glossy prints on the other option look superb but the general use case across different mediums of the 8550 judt ticks off more boxes for me. Csn you recommend any good close to glossy paper products for the 8850 please. Ive been a retoucher for 16 years but the printing world has scared but finally im fed up with a lack of good printing services for my basic needs and have decided to purchase this printer. Especially now that the ink system is refillable. Another question. Would you recommend buying a 5 year waranty for this printer from epson. Ive seen it available for maybe £165 (in danish krone) i think its a no brainer as ive seen so many printers go into ewaste.
For glossy - see the papers tested in the two main [written] reviews at:
www.northlight-images.co.uk/epson-et-8550-printer-review/
and
www.northlight-images.co.uk/epson-et-8500-printer-review/
Much appreciated Keith, excellent videos. Here is a tidbit to give you even more views, the Middle East / India model name is L8160 for the A4 model (no A3+) and you correctly identified the alternative names for the other printers (L18050..)
Thanks!
Great review! I'm considering displaying it in a shop located in a tourist village where we print photos for guests, considering the affordable maintenance costs. Currently, we use a Canon Pixma printer with dye inks and print on a 300g Marrutt Ultrapearlescent paper, which is semi-glossy. Would the suggested paper be a suitable replacement? Should I go for a glossy paper weighing 265g instead? Thank you, greetings from Italy.
Thanks - I don't know that paper. A lot depends on how thick it is. The printer does need an ICC profile for the paper for best results.
Hello Keith, Have you calculated aprox. how much ink is used for printing an A3 photo in the best quality on the 8550?
Not data I was able to get whilst the printer was here - my testing was far too varied
@@KeithCooper i understand, thank you!
great vid , what would be the best photo paper for the 18100 for a best gloss finish in your opinion .
Thanks - difficult to say, I've only tested a few. High gloss papers make up a small proportion of my test collection...
@@KeithCooper because I am trying some perma jet gloss 271 and getting faint tram lines roller marks
I suspect lighter papers will win out, but it's going to be very dependent on the actual paper and thickness - no marks whatsoever on Epson PGPP [on the printer I tested with}
Ηello Keith.I always enjoy your videos.Does the 18100 have rear paper feed for printing poster boards like the 8550?
no - just the one feed [excluding the cd/ID card holder]
@@KeithCooper Thank you very much for the answer.
Hi Keith, I see you have two printers I’m looking at buying but struggling to choose as I can’t see a side-by-side comparison. Which produces better photo quality: the Et-8550 or Canon Pixma-200? Thank you
Ah, I have a lot of printers pass through the house ;-)
No simple answer - different inksets
It's why I so rarely do side by side comparisons - they can easily be meaningless...
Depends on paper choices for example. See the actual reviews
www.northlight-images.co.uk/epson-et-8550-printer-review/
www.northlight-images.co.uk/canon-pro-200-printer-review/
Hi Keith! Thanks so much for your videos 🙏. After hours at looking at them, I finaly bought the Epson ET-8550. Can you help me? In Photoshop I made a file 8.5 X 11 inches. In it, there is a picture of 7 X 10 inches. The guide lines and ruler indicate it is really 7 X 10. But when I print on the actual 8.5 X 11 paper, the picture is 6.75 inches instead of 7 inches 🤔. I tried different options and they are not working. Thanks ahead for your help!
Print with Epson print layout and specify the print size - you can specify either the margin or print size.
You don't need a border - just print the actual image from a 7x10 canvas
@@KeithCooper Thanks Keith for answering so quickly. I did choose in the printer properties the document format 8,5 x 11 inches. I also choose for the paper output 8,5 x 11 as well. I tried "no margins" and also the contrary, but there is does not work either.
See my edit above
Print a 7x10 as a 7x10
@@KeithCooper OK, I'll try that a little later, and I'll will tell you how turned out. Thank you Keith. You're very generous 😉
Thank you Keith! Such an informative video, however I still can't decide between these two for printing family photos mainly. Also, can you please tell me if the l8050 is the A4 version of the et-18100 (l18050)? Or is it a different printer? These model names confuse me a lot
I'm afraid I don't know - you need to compare the listed specs.
It's a model I've never seen
Simple choice - just glossy photos or glossy/matte with a scanner
@@KeithCooper thank you, the reason why I can't decide is that you said et-18100 does the glossy photo print better than et-8550. Glossy photo printing is the main reason I'm planning to buy a printer like these, but I like the other features of the et-8550. Is glossy print quality that much better or for non professional eyes the et-8550 will be enough? I'm looking forward for you opinion.
One is better, it doesn't mean the other is bad... ;-)
Now you see why I so rarely ever do product comparisons ;-)
With good profiles, the 8550 is fine - most people will not notice a difference unless it's pointed out to them, and even then half won't see it. The 18100 is just very good on some papers
If I wanted one of these printers [I don't - I've got bigger ones!], I'd pick the 8550 myself for versatility
Hi Keith, can you foresee EcoTank printers for A2 format in the near future? Thanks.
Near future - not a chance I'd suspect
If you look at the size of the ink carts in the P5000 and upwards (canon PRO-2100 and up) then they are already quite large - perhaps a swap to ink 'bags' rather than carts (I've seen it in some of Epson's bigger production printers)
I wouldn't expect any change to the P5000 (or Canon PRO-1000) this year at all...
@@KeithCooper It's a shame because the A2 size is already very interesting to display, but the cost in ink and the printer itself are too high for me. Especially the ink is very expensive. Thanks for your opinion.
Great video as always!
Thanks!
Hi, can you print on acetate sheets on the ET-8550?
See here for a discussion about this from when I was testing the 8550
ua-cam.com/video/pTnQQdBj_WQ/v-deo.html
Hey Keith, I bought the epson-et18100 and I was very satisfied with the print quality, this morning one of my sheet got jammed inside my paper, she removed it by herself, now it’s leaving black marks everywhere, and the print head are touching against my paper, do you know any solution to this?
Sorry I don't - try asking [with details] at www.printerknowledge.com
What kind of glossy papers do you use? Are there any that arent sticky and moreso like cvs glossy photo paper?
Or anything like shutterflys matte photo paper.
None of them are 'sticky'. I've tested several [the full list will be in the written review] Epson PGPP works well
Never heard of 'shutterfly' or cvs I'm afraid [I'm in the Uk]
Hi Keith! How good is the Epson Expression Photo XP-970 in comparison?
Difficult to say - I reviewed the XP-960 back in 2016
www.northlight-images.co.uk/epson-expression-photo-xp-960-printer-review/
Long before someone at Canon convinced me to start adding the little videos to my reviews ;-)
Hi, can you help me please? Which one is suitable for matte coated photo papers (I print deep dark background graphics and light detailed watercolor graphics too, but I only use matte inkjet photo paper). Are the prints waterproof / drip-proof? (I am currently using the L3250 printer (this ink is 103 - waterproof), I want the same quality in A3+ size.) Thank you for your reply.
8550
Not waterproof - no normal inkjet is. Any good paper dislikes getting wet ;-)
Nothing I've tested is properly waterproof - the inks are not really made for that. Some media may be better. It's not a feature I normally test in any way.
However - See my TC-20M review for the testing of a synthetic paper, and washing a print
ua-cam.com/video/UtqahFm4czY/v-deo.html
@@KeithCooper I tried it and the L3250 printers are waterproof, that's why I asked, but thanks for the reply.
@@KeithCooper Can you tell meg which printer is better for matte coated photo papers (I print deep dark background graphics and light detailed watercolor graphics too, but I only use matte inkjet photo paper)?
Never seen a L3250 printer I'm afraid
'Better'?? Size/budget?
There is no 'best' really [I don't sell printers ;-) ]
if i wanted to use this printer for doing things such as invitations etc would the et-8550 suit that role better or are there any other printers better for this.
The 18100 does not handle thicker media as well, so the 8550 is better in this respect.
As to more suitable to your needs?... quite possible, but all come with trade-offs.
The Canon PRO-200 has better paper handling, but not ink tanks, so pricier ink
Hi, which one of these two would you recommend for sublimation conversion??
Neither - not a subject I've ever investigated. It's a great way of killing a printer, and mine tend to be loans from the manufacturers ;-)
bon test merci . laquelle choisiriez-vous pour imprimer des négatifs digitaux (contretypes) sur papier transparent ? ( voleur ou B&W) ? merci
Sorry - don't know what this is?
@@KeithCooper digital négatives on pictorico
Sorry what? - using this on a system with NO TRANSLATION
@@KeithCooper sorry, I just wanted to know your opinion regarding the possibility of printing digital negatives (internegatives) for contact prints, with one of these printers. as permajet translucent inkjet film suited for creating digital negatives for darkroom use. thank you for everything you share
I didn't test this in any detail, so whilst I'd expect both printers to work with the right film, I don't know what the density would be like for negatives, or whether the 'pizza wheel' marks might be an issue.
This is one to ask on a specialist alt-process forum
Hi Keith, i am looking at purchasing the 8550, i want to do prints on matte A3 paper, do you recommend any specific matte paper for this printer ?
Not really - see the ones I tried in the main [written] review - these are ones I've made profiles for
See too the info about media settings - this is very important for matte media
www.northlight-images.co.uk/epson-et-8550-printer-review/
How does the 8550 compare to the Canon Pixma 200
Two quite different printers aimed at different markets
Read the actual reviews?
www.northlight-images.co.uk/canon-pro-200-printer-review/
www.northlight-images.co.uk/epson-et-8550-printer-review/
@@KeithCooper Yes I know - I did. There isn’t a head to head and trying to compare print quality for photo prints. From what I read I’m leaning towards the 200, but just making sure I didn’t misunderstand
Ah, I do very few 'head to head' comparisons [this is in 20+ years of reviews]
The problem is that what matters is different to everyone who ever asks, and likely different to me. Essentially meaningless, and that's before we even approach the issue of what print 'quality' means ;-) All too often, I'm minded to suggest, people just use them to justify their existing preference - I don't sell printers, so I'm not into that... ;-) :-)
But...
The 200 has somewhat better paper handling, but is much more expensive to run.
Print 'quality' - more dependent on user expertise and profile quality than any inherent differences. If I did my best print on each, few people could spot the difference... ;-)
Does the 18100 print borderless at 13x19?
Yes - see the review...
www.northlight-images.co.uk/epson-et-18100-printer-review/
How’s this glossy color printing quality compared to the CANON-100?
Against the 10 year old PRO-100?
[2014 review] www.northlight-images.co.uk/canon-pixma-pro-100-printer-review/
Better for colour glossy/lustre prints
Worse for thicker papers/art-papers/black and white
Vastly cheaper for ink costs
The PRO-200 is a distinct improvement on the PRO-100 in terms of usability
@@KeithCooper thank you so much for the prompt reply! 🙏
It was the 18100 I was referring to - the 8550 is a much more capable general purpose printer, from a range of media and usability POV - the hybrid ink set is what makes for an interesting printer.
@@KeithCooper I have the CANON-PRO100, and it always blows me away with its quality. I’m using it with Precision Colors. I asked because I am wondering if it’s worth the upgrade to the 18100 or PRO200.
If you are happy with it, why spend more money
If you are using 3rd party ink and are OK with is, then why change
Can we use 300 gsm matte materials?
Yes, in the 8550 - unlikely in the 18100
See the reviews for each printer
Does the 18100 print great on fiber based metallic papers? For that matter, are there metallic fiber papers or only RC style ?
I've never seen a fibre based metallic paper... ;-)
It will depend on thickness and how easily it takes marks - if you find one I'm not betting too much on it working well...
@@KeithCooper Thanks. That is what I thought. It was worth asking though. I always appreciate your videos and information.
@@KeithCooper Hahnemühle Photo Rag® Metallic 340gsm was the one I was referring to.
Thanks - not seen that one. Just looked at the specs, I'd put the likelihood of it working in the ET-18100 as very low ;-)
@@KeithCooper yes. Better with pigment. Thanks.
the 8550 can do fax ? wow
Sorry - no...
That's why my videos are always secondary to my detailed written review articles, they get checked, updated, refined over time
YT videos will contain verbal typos - once published, they are set in stone :-(
All my videos are unscripted, and should have E&EO added to the credits...
Get a Brother laser printer.....
Irrelevant if I'm looking for a photo printer
Maybe if I just want a document printer - given I review printers for printing photos/art/cards/canvas etc, the laser is trailing a long way down the list...
@@KeithCooper Laser printer is cheaper in the long run.
Another irrelevance if I want to print photos, art, cards etc
This video is absolutely not concerned with use as an office printer.
If you want an office printer, look amongst the wide range office printers...
If 18100 had gray ink...
If only it had better paper handling...
Taking your articles into consideration with my needs (B&W, mainly matte) i'd choose 8550. Respect to your efforts and perfectly readible website.
The only doubt is that maybe pigment printer would be better. As 8550 costs my 3 week incomes, I cannot take two..
The benefits of pigments and/or disadvantages of dyes can easily be overstated ;-)
For many, the benefits of not worrying about ink costs and the freedom to experiment can be more important?
Not available from Epson in the united states
18050
The L18050 is a European model number for what is the ET-18100 in the UK and some other regions
As yet, this printer does not appear on any Epson US site I've seen?
As usual a great help, many thanks.
Thanks