I didn't share all the audio, but some of the arriving aircraft were calling +/- 10 to 20 on the approach. Hard to say without actually being in the cockpit. But if I had a loss of 20, I'd be calling it a shear.
Thx Lou... enjoy the video and amazing what type of weather and wind these planes can land and take off in... kudos to the pilots.. and to the technology!
Yeah, pretty flat! Most add 20 kts to VREF on days like this. The deck angle is lower and the plane can float for awhile if you aren't careful, but that was pretty darn flat.
Wind shear by definition a sudden change in wind speed and or direction over a short distance. And that's what gusts are. The pilots were calling +/- 20 kts on these approaches. Many went around, gear down. A gear down go around is standard procedure for a windshear event.
It's the shear to a tailwind. In the cockpit you experience an instant loss of airspeed. The plane wants to drop and if the speed gets too slow, the plane can stall. We carry extra speed on the approach to deal with this possibility, that's why you see some of the planes landing a bit further down the runway than normal. Good times.
Are you sure it was windshear??? On my knowledge, windshear is a critical situation that drop down the airplane, and go around it is required. For me it was just crosswind land.
Windshear by definition is a sudden gain or loss of airspeed. I didn't include all the audio, but pilots were reporting +/- 10 to 20 kts on approach. By watching, it's hard to really tell without the audio. I will tell you as a pilot that flies into Narita often, it gets pretty crazy on a strong SW wind.
Yeah, that too. I didn't include all the ATC, but as the planes exited the runway, they were giving +/- 10 to 20 kts on approach. This was shot the same day as these..... ua-cam.com/video/_AW--9_F6OU/v-deo.html
It's actually better to fly with an Airbus sidestick because they are technologically more advanced giving you a more comfortable landing than a yoke. You can research about the differences in cockpit designs.
Yeah, I can't comment as I've never flown one. That said, I do like direct control of the flight controls without a computer in the way. But maybe that's showing my age more than anything.....
@@stevenwb nop you're wrong, one the disadvantages of fly by wire it's actually crosswinds landings etc. They don't have feedback on the side stick and end up with excessive inputs, exacerbate even more the situation.
Snakes on a plane must be your favorite movie haha. Awesome video
LOL. Thanks so much. More snakes videos coming soon....if I can find some!
Ok
Those planes look like they are jus being thrown around. Uggg!!!
Good times!
Wow, that first plane was wobbling around all over the place and the wing flex was crazy. Must have been a bit terrifying for the passengers.
Yeah, I’ll bet it was a nervous cabin.
I need an air sick bag just watching.
Yeah, I hear that.
Amazing intense footage. Very cool ❤️
Thanks. It was a great day to watch, although I wish I was in the air.
I think the EVA A330 nailed it in my opinion, great footage as always
Thanks so much. I'll try and post a few more of these.
skillful pilots. you can tell their experinced pilots.
Wow! And I mean it....superb as always Captain...
Thanks so much. Good times
Great footage once again!
Thanks so much!
Superb vid, love watching them wobble
Thanks, me too.
Do u think a yoke is much better in this situation than flight stick? Lol i know this is a silly question but i just wanna know
The 747 is the only jet I've flown. I like the yoke. I haven't flown a stick, so it's hard to really comment.
That A380 looked scary
Yeah, pretty flat as he was carrying extra airspeed on the approach. Almost hit the nose first.....
U look scary...... kidding 🥱
Is this really windshear.. or just gusty crosswinds?
I didn't share all the audio, but some of the arriving aircraft were calling +/- 10 to 20 on the approach. Hard to say without actually being in the cockpit. But if I had a loss of 20, I'd be calling it a shear.
Thx Lou... enjoy the video and amazing what type of weather and wind these planes can land and take off in... kudos to the pilots.. and to the technology!
@@loub747Loss of 20 knots? Seems scary. But not enough to activate the automated wind shear alert, right?
How come no flare for the TG388?
Yeah, pretty flat! Most add 20 kts to VREF on days like this. The deck angle is lower and the plane can float for awhile if you aren't careful, but that was pretty darn flat.
Jesus, some serious crabbing going n there
Great stuff, thanks!!
Thanks, it's my pleasure.
My friend.. This is not windshear... Just gusty winds...
Wind shear by definition a sudden change in wind speed and or direction over a short distance. And that's what gusts are. The pilots were calling +/- 20 kts on these approaches. Many went around, gear down. A gear down go around is standard procedure for a windshear event.
Here's video on the same day, approximately the same time. Plenty of tower issued windshear alerts....
ua-cam.com/video/_AW--9_F6OU/v-deo.html
Thank you for making good movies on UA-cam all the time.
Is Narita airport landing is difficult Airport?
Thank you for watching. Narita is pretty tame most of the time, but when the winds blow strong out of the SW, it gets a bit crazy.
Always the best ✊🏽
Thank you!
As a pliot, what's the biggest challenge with windshears like this?
It's the shear to a tailwind. In the cockpit you experience an instant loss of airspeed. The plane wants to drop and if the speed gets too slow, the plane can stall. We carry extra speed on the approach to deal with this possibility, that's why you see some of the planes landing a bit further down the runway than normal. Good times.
Realy amazing video again. I also want to become a pilot.
Thanks so much! Do it, you won't regret it.
Are you sure it was windshear??? On my knowledge, windshear is a critical situation that drop down the airplane, and go around it is required. For me it was just crosswind land.
Windshear by definition is a sudden gain or loss of airspeed. I didn't include all the audio, but pilots were reporting +/- 10 to 20 kts on approach. By watching, it's hard to really tell without the audio. I will tell you as a pilot that flies into Narita often, it gets pretty crazy on a strong SW wind.
03:04 no flare at all haha
Yeah, I'm assuming he was carrying 20 kts, making the approach pretty flat. But almost a 3 pointer there!
Pros!
Cross wind landings?
Yeah, that too. I didn't include all the ATC, but as the planes exited the runway, they were giving +/- 10 to 20 kts on approach. This was shot the same day as these..... ua-cam.com/video/_AW--9_F6OU/v-deo.html
I wonder how many puke bags were used that day. Because 🤢😰
I hear you.
condition like these I would rather a Boeing yoke😊
I've only flown Boeing, but would have to agree.
It's actually better to fly with an Airbus sidestick because they are technologically more advanced giving you a more comfortable landing than a yoke. You can research about the differences in cockpit designs.
Yeah, I can't comment as I've never flown one. That said, I do like direct control of the flight controls without a computer in the way. But maybe that's showing my age more than anything.....
@@stevenwb nop you're wrong, one the disadvantages of fly by wire it's actually crosswinds landings etc. They don't have feedback on the side stick and end up with excessive inputs, exacerbate even more the situation.
WOW
Good times