M1128 Stryker Mobile Gun System 105mm Tank Gun Firing - M1128ストライカーMGS(機動砲システム) 105mm戦車砲発射
Вставка
- Опубліковано 21 чер 2016
- U.S. Army Soldiers fire from the M1128 Mobile Gun System (MGS) 105 mm tank gun on Stryker armored vehicles.
Click here to Subscribe USA Military Channel: ua-cam.com/users/subscription_...
アメリカ陸軍のストライカー装甲車に105mm戦車砲を搭載したM1128ストライカーMGS(機動砲システム / Mobile Gun System)。
USAミリタリーチャンネルのチャンネル登録はこちら→ua-cam.com/users/subscription_...
Facebook: / usamilitarychannel
Twitter: / usa_military_ch "The appearance of U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) visual information does not imply or constitute DoD endorsement." - Авто та транспорт
森林の間からの射撃は初めて見たけどかっこいい
ボーンって撃った後に「ふぅ…」って感じに前後に車体がふわーんってなるの好き
個人的に戦車よりこういう機動砲システムのが好きだな〜
戦車と機動法システムて何が違うんですか？無知ですいません
@@user-sw9ty1si8s 戦車砲は主に対戦車同士の撃ち合いを第一に作るので威力も命中精度も非常に高い
（メイン口径は105～125ミリが多く採用される）機動砲は主に歩兵戦闘車両系（俗に言う装甲車)に載せられる大火力系火器として採用してます（メイン口径は７５ミリ～105ミリが主流）一見すれば戦車とも撃ち合えるんじゃ？と思われますけど歩兵戦闘車系は戦車より装甲は薄く軽量に作られてる（一般的には15トンくらいで戦車は４０～７０トンの重さです）そのため機動砲は軽量かつ車両への負担を減らすため威力は戦車砲より弱くなるのですが同じ装甲車系統なら一撃で破壊できる威力は持ってますし何より装甲車をベースにしてるので戦車より速度も高く空輸なども迅速に行えるのが強みなのです。車両同士の戦闘というより歩兵への支援火力としての目的を強く意識してるのが機動砲でガチの大砲の撃ち合いは戦車砲という感じでしょうね。
@@user-sw9ty1si8s でけぇ図体と装甲が厚いのが戦車で機動力はあるけど装甲の薄いやつが装輪戦車と機動砲システムです
薬莢が外側に排出されるの良いね。
俺も好き
撃った後砲塔の後ろから薬莢が出てるw
音が好き
Dear America: You had a pile of 105's in storage and weren't sure what to do with them. So; you stuck them on a light-weight chassis, and installed an auto-loader, despite the problems experienced with such systems.
Glad for usa selling the Stryker
M1126 8×8 vehicle to first Thailand
ストライカーって砲塔変えて
色んな用途に使える車両だったよね
Wowwww is mazing
I would never have imagined that the 105 mm from the Centurion would ever be put on an armoured car. I suppose it is the same gun. Does It have a bore sighting system on the barrel combined with the computer? Fifty years ago, it just had a ranging gun.
Woooow
1:45 the first person view is cool
I know this vehicle from COD MW2
ストライカーMGSといい、16式機動戦闘車といい、ガンパレの士魂号Lを思い出す。
後方に排出された薬莢、回収するんだw
ライフルリングがあるってことは滑空砲ではないのね
陸自の機動戦闘車とどっちが強いかな？
機動戦闘車のも見てみたい
“Ah think they meyyesd!”
Thailand🇹🇭❤️M1126
Cal 105 mm ?
悲報:廃止決定
森のくまさんもビックリ
ハンビィーちゃんはかわいいなぁ
0:40 耳が死んだ
มีข่าวปลอมเข้ามาเรารู้คะ เราเลยไม่คอมเม้นค่ะ
Philippine army need this for urban combat
1:06 薬莢 排出
lol that's honey badger from CODMW3
撃ったあと後ろから薬莢出てくるの、なんかウンコしてるみたい笑笑
薬莢欲しくなるな
My couty buy this TH
I hope the Chinese are enjoying this lmao
Lo que necesita el ejercito nacional de colombia .
@Hammerschlägen M no idiota , para neutralizar , a cierto pais vecino , que desde año 2000 a menazado , no menos de 50 veces a colombia.
森の中から撃つのいいな。16式の参考になる。日本も山森が多いからこうやって潜んで撃たれたら敵は相当いやだと思う。16式の装甲が弱いことも補えるし。
古いコメ失礼するが、ストライカーは対戦車戦闘は考慮されて無かったはずなので、16式の方が対戦車戦闘においては有利だと思います
@@nagon4611
単に歩兵砲のっけた装甲車って感じですからね
サムネイルは、ロケット砲の攻撃を軽減し生存率を上げるガードが採用されているストライカーのようです。
@@nagon4611 Stryker MGS is mainly used to support infantry instead of anti tank combat, it usually has mostly explosive shells and pellet canister shells, and only a few armor piercing shells.
Instead, Stryker brigades have vehicles to launch TOW missiles, as well as Javelin missiles on CROWS remote turrets and Hellfire missiles on IM-SHORAD version. There are a lot of anti tank missiles in a Stryker brigade. Stryker mortar vehicles can also use cluster shells and guided shells for anti armor attacks out of line of sight.
Sorry this is in English, I don't want to disrespect Japanese with bad translations.
うわーすごいおとだー
使徒襲来
0:40 my ears are completely bleeding.
what is the vertical angle of movement of the gun ??
-10 to +18, apparently.
戦車だとヒトマルやキューマルにオートローダーがあるのにエイブラムスにはなく、装輪では逆にキドセンにはオートローダーがなくMGSにはあるというこの日米の対比が面白い。裏にどんな運用思想の違いがあるんだろうか。
So, question is track or wheeled preferred ?
The both have their pros and cons, for instance your track gets knocked out, where does that leave you? incompacitated. A LAV has 8 wheels ( run flats ) it can go forever.
Great move to a 105 mm gun.
Great target practice too for an enemy with just 60mm light motor fire or even 4⁰mm grenade attachment on a assault rifle, these things are thin skinned.
и шовы американцы хочете показать какпривыстреле прямой наводкой стррайкер качается
But, LIKE ✌️👍
電子機器や照準装置は3.5世代並みかな？。
走行間射撃は出来るんかな？装輪式だから、それなりのスピードは出ると思うがな
出来ますよ。普通に。
いやー撃てても命中はキツイっすね。機動戦闘車なんかは装甲車両とやり合う気まんまんの駆逐戦車ですけど、こいつは単に歩兵を火力支援するための歩兵砲ですから。走行間射撃能力は考慮されてません。
BTW, it isn't tank gun, its whelled tank destroyer
@Hammerschlägen M Agree, mistake
@Hammerschlägen M No problem m8 , have nice day :-)
US of A for you
Do they have to be manually reloaded every round?
No it’s an autoloader
All 18 rounds that the vehicle carried are in 2 autoloader racks.
The first rack is between the gunner and commander - it's a cylindrical rack that holds 8 rounds which would lift the round up into the unmanned turret above. the other 10 rounds is stored in the secondary ammunition autoloader rack; once 8 rounds is expended, or if the TC want to pick a round that isn't available in the main rack, the secondary rack - which sat behind the main autoloader rack, would autoload the round into the main ammo rack.
右前あたりに室外機みたいなのあるけど
小銃で破損させられたら
照準システムのパソコンいっちゃう？
もしそうだったら致命的なミスだな
ป้าดต่อโท้ะ
MERICA FK YEAHH🇺🇸🗽
最近は歩兵戦闘車に興味があります
海兵隊のLAV-25の動画が見たいです
Are they still having issues with the barrel and chassis cracking, lol! Look at how it jumps a few degrees off centre when it fires, , poor stability compared to a main battle tank, that's why it misses. Underpowered shells too. Google.
You are mounting a big gun on a troop carrier chassis, the ammo is weak compared to current mbt rounds. But then again it's to flank n spank not to face things frontally.
It's designed for direct fire support for infantry not tank on tank warfare
Google is an information source from a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend...
The wheels look tired
これBF3に出てたような・・・
山田希 そうやで
Until you run into a modern mbt and that 105 just bounces off
It's not a tank hunter it's a direct infantry support vehicle designed to follow troops in places the much heavier mbts can't go that's why the US military have them
I’m sure two or three shots of 105HE or HEAT would at least damage some outside equipment or sensory devices.
There are more Strykers with TOW, Hellfire, or Javelin missiles than there are with 105mm guns. 105mm is the least important AT capability in a Stryker brigade. Even the 120mm mortar carrier has anti-armor capability with cluster munitions and guided rounds, Stryker brigades are not hurting for anti-armor capability.
Plus, light vehicles like Strykers can operate in terrains like coasts, mountains, and fragile road infrastructure that MBTs can't operate in. They're a separate role from heavy mech and armored units.
@@JonMarvel desde el momento que apuntas con tu telemetro láser a un tanque moderno, ya estás muerto
"Until you run into a modern mbt and that 105 just bounces off"
The vehicle only carried 18 rounds in total. Guess what kind of ammo it used? of those 18 rounds onboard, half (10 rounds) are just for the HESH rounds. What about the other 8 rounds? 4 of them are HEAT round, 2 of them are Tungsten balls "shotgun" Canister round, and only 2 of them are M900 APFSDS.
and those 2 sabot round are only used as emergency condition. You know why? because you misunderstood the vehicle's intetional role - THIS IS NOT A TANK DESTROYER (That role is given to the Stryker M1134 Missile tank destroyer) and the M1128 is nothing more than a modern and wheeled STUG - it's an Assault Gun. Just like WW2 Stug III, the vehicle is designed for infantry support; while it can take a tank, it wasn't designed to do such role.
Do they float?
Woah, dude!
鼓膜とか、いっぱつで
どうにかなってしまい
そう とか
อย่าลืม.ผบ.ทบ-ส่งไปทางใต้บ้าง
เพราะทหารตายเหมือนผักปลา
All these would be very deadly if they ever put mini Gunn's on them or put the A10 cannon on it n see what happens lol or something else closer to it size wise lol a cannon for big slug shells and then like some mini Gunn's on it like 2 or 3 lol
Mmmmm tutto copiato dal nodtro blindo Centauro 🇮🇹
初めの弾薬ケースいるのかな？
んで車体が浮くのか笑笑
16式機動戦闘車より反動.揺れすごいな
火薬の量も関係してるのでは。
機動砲システムも機動戦闘車も同じ規格の弾薬だから火薬は変わらないよ。
機動戦闘車は約26tで機動砲システムは約19t。
しかも機動戦闘車は専用設計だけど、機動砲システムはあくまでストライカーのファミリーだもん。反動で揺れるのは仕方ない。
そら駆逐戦車と自走歩兵砲じゃね
退役するならウクライナにあげられないかな?
日本の機動戦闘車もそろそろ配備が始まるぞ
That's a colt .45 pistol on wheels
@Noel Normandin right , nobody wants to be shot by that eight-wheeled gun except for bad guys
🇺🇲👨🏻👍🏻
應發展氣動坦克車
Can this penetrate T90 tank?
Side shot maybe but they are designed for infantry support only.
@@GamingLegend-ie4nl firing HE? A bit costly isn't it? Why not replace it with a 120mm automatic mortar ? That would be way better for infantry and packs more anti personnel punch
@@ConstantineJoseph It does fire armor piercing rounds for vehicles engagements but it rarely sees them. Also the main 105 is already a massive strain on the suspension from the recoil going any bigger can damage the tanks suspension. One round they carry does pack a punch because it's like a sized up shotgun shell with 500 ball bearings. Either way they work in units of different variants one with the 105, one with a guided missile platform and one with a 30mm.
@@GamingLegend-ie4nl Missile platform for infantry will cost a LOT of money operating them. 120mm mortars pack less of a recoil than a long range firing 105mm tank gun. Especially when the recoil is downwards instead of backwards.
Even light skinned vehicles can be badly damaged by 120mm proximity shrapnels. They are simply very deadly.
To save cost that should have been the standard.
My take would be to have a fleet of mortar and grenade launcher vehicles with some 30mm auto cannon ones, and a few ATGM variants. This would be more than enough for infantry support. Spending anymore would be a waste of money considering that these vehicles no longer fight standing conventional armies of 100k men to 500k, but rather assymetrical warfare that needs specialized tools.
@@ConstantineJoseph The 30mm auto cannon and ATGM variants of the Stryker outnumber the ones with the 105 because of the flaws they have. So it is cost effective for infantry use. There are only less than 200 made and most of them don't have a 105.
If my country AFP doesnt want tanks, they should atleast buy this
fucking hell thats loud
when u want to carry a troop but 30mm cannon not gonna cut it..
You can't even carry any troop in this vehicle. It only carried 3 of its crew and 18 rounds (of 10 HESH rounds, 4 HEAT round, 2 Canister round, and 2 Sabot round) and the rear passenger compartment isn't present in the M1128, as those are occupied by the large autoloader mechanism that hold the vehicle's 10 spare rounds that would auto-load/replenish the main autoloader in the turret (between the TC and gunner seat)
Jesus loves you my friends
크고 우람한 날탄이네요
La brutta copia del centauro
16式とどっちが戦闘能力高いんだろうか？
MCVだとおもう
global inmu やっぱそうよね
@@user-bx1fh9gh9j 即応機動連隊で歩兵してるけどMCVは頼もしい
@@globalnobu9163 おっ！即機連
どこだろう？
@@osaru3574 同業者でRDRの方ですか?
1:07撃った後に、空薬莢が飛び出すとか、完全にセミオートマチック拳銃の巨大版だな(￣▽￣;)
なんで薬莢欲しがる人おるんや？枕にでもするん？
毎日抱きしめながらねるんよ
4 problems:
1. 0.50 cal gun and shield easily snag overhanging wires and be trapped
2. even 9mm or shrapnel will destroy cooling fans on the right side
3. Too much recoil, long reload times
4. your own soldiers protecting stryker cannot stand behind otherwise get knocked out.
Sophisticated but I am sure if this vehicles were to meet with Ratels it will come off second. By the way I would rather chose the Bumerang.
this is not American military this is propaganda look at comment section and the video just ain't right to me something up with it
propaganda
4 problems to your "Problems"
1. There's a wire cutter attachment that all Stryker vehicle carried as standard (it's foldable and just forward of the driver hatch), and this wire cutter will be the first barrier for any wire to snag and cut before even reaching the turret.
2. If the cooling fans is damaged, its a negligible issue in shorter run, especially when vehicle like this aren't designed for prolonged operation.
3. Long reload and too much recoil is completely moot point since speed isn't its main selling point, but its firepower-per-cost; the MGS is a modern STUG used to support infantry when firing Javelin is costly, and indirect artillery attack would do too much collateral damage.
4. The soldier isn't protecting this vehicle, this vehicle is being placed behind and only called to protect the soldier - being a habitual attachment vehicle for the Stryker platoon, it's not being used for frontline use other than in dire situation that require the vehicle to blast bunkers or defensive position at short notice.
good lord... the fucking recoil on this is a nightmare
Are you not afraid of the invincible North-Korean compulsory conscripts ?? They are invincible , because compulsory military service is tough and hard like Hell ; so compulsory conscripts are much more superior to a Professional Army . ( According to some people ).
Completely false, considering their army consists of inferior technology. The North are just now creating nuclear weapons.
Conventional military force is based on driving new recruits ( especially compulsory conscripts ) through Hell . though i wonder it will forever work or maybe not
Aaaaaaaand whOMp.
Overrated and misused, the LAV600 will rip the Stryker apart and why do they keep making these "variants" when you can maximize a platform by building it up to meet your needs from the beginning. How about a Stryker that mounts a 50mm auto cannon with RWS and side mounted ATGM, how is it that the French Russians and Italy get that, oh! I forgot the MIC runs our military, therefore dictating how platform's are procured, these so called experts will have the DOD waste money on 5 variants instead of 2 or 3 that can meet all mission requirements. The Stryker can be a great weapon, but only if common sense is applied to it, for example, all of those Bradley turrets that are sitting up can be added to some Strykers giving the cavalry a formidable system for reconnaissance missions. Just saying
More Varients the better, A more diverse team of vehicle on the field yo. If you see what the Saudis are getting from General Dynamics its like 8-10 varients.
They already made a 30mm variant for units deployed in Europe. And it’s a sit on top, too, so it can still carry troops as well.
But the MGS is not for recon or front line combat. It’s an assault gun.
OLD DESIGN.....European design is better than this
Fielded in 2012
Old indeed
This has many flaws. Very bad indeed!
Such a bad design, soldiers risk their lives hiding behind this thing. Also this gun overpowers the chassis way too much and this is with reduced propellant rounds!
戦車の魅力伝わらない。。。汚いし遅いしうるさい。上から爆弾落とされる1発で破壊されるし。今度はデカい薬莢散らかすんかい。誰が拾うんだよ??
これ戦車やない高機動車や
ちょっとコメ失礼するゾ〜
普通に戦車、70km/hとか80km/hとか出るんですけどそれって遅いんですかねぇ。ワイスピとかの観過ぎかなんかですかねぇ(適当)
そんなこと言ったら戦闘機もミサイル当たったら終わりだし、駆逐艦も対艦ミサイルくらったらひとたまりもない気がするんだが、詳しくは知らんけど戦車などが攻撃してる時って制空権を確保してから戦車を使ってるんじゃないの？
おい知ったかよく聞け。そもそも戦車はびっくりするほど遅くないし薬莢は外に排出するんじゃなくて戦車内に排出するんだ。この動画の車両は戦車じゃなくて装甲車。あと汚いとか言ってるけど戦場で汚れるのは当たり前じゃん。爆弾落とされたら終わるて言ってるけど制空権も取ってない地域で地上車両を出すバカいないだろ。今の戦車は爆弾とかロケット弾に対して対策もちゃんとしてあるから。そんな事も知らないで戦車の事を語ってんじゃねぇ。ちゃんと勉強してからこう言うコメントしろ知ったか君^ ^ 長文失礼
Hakujin Mike 見事なまでに論破されてるな。どんまい