Thank you for sharing! Some questions: 1) In Custom Code Analysis app, Transition Scenario field (shown in the video), what is the actual difference between System Conversion and New Implementation option? I believe the same checks apply, so what exactly is different? What are the consequences of making that choice? 2) What is the difference between Priority 1 and Priority 2 ATC findings? I've been unable to find an answer in documentation on this.
1) The checks are the same, the actual difference is, that for New Implementation initially the custom code migration scope is empty and must be filled manually (which code should go to the greenfield S/4HANA system) and there is a button "Save scope as transport request" to save this code for transport. During System Conversion scenario the initial scope of custom code for migration is calculated based on usage data and deletion transport with unused code is created, there is "Create deletion transport" button 2) The priorities were taken over from Code Inspector (see message priorities in the SCI transaction): 1- error, 2 - warning
@@tanzmausitanzmausi139 Thanks for a reply! Yes, I know that 1 is error and 2 is warning but how is it determined which one is which? I looked all over the place and could not find any explanation. Surely there must be some method behind the madness here.
Hi Jelena, the default priority (1,2, or 3) is set by the ATC check authors. Since no one can ensure that their ideas match the wishes of the users, it is possible to customize the priorities in every system.
Beautiful
Thank you for sharing! Some questions:
1) In Custom Code Analysis app, Transition Scenario field (shown in the video), what is the actual difference between System Conversion and New Implementation option? I believe the same checks apply, so what exactly is different? What are the consequences of making that choice?
2) What is the difference between Priority 1 and Priority 2 ATC findings? I've been unable to find an answer in documentation on this.
1) The checks are the same, the actual difference is, that for New Implementation initially the custom code migration scope is empty and must be filled manually (which code should go to the greenfield S/4HANA system) and there is a button "Save scope as transport request" to save this code for transport. During System Conversion scenario the initial scope of custom code for migration is calculated based on usage data and deletion transport with unused code is created, there is "Create deletion transport" button
2) The priorities were taken over from Code Inspector (see message priorities in the SCI transaction): 1- error, 2 - warning
@@tanzmausitanzmausi139 Thanks for a reply! Yes, I know that 1 is error and 2 is warning but how is it determined which one is which? I looked all over the place and could not find any explanation. Surely there must be some method behind the madness here.
Hi Jelena, the default priority (1,2, or 3) is set by the ATC check authors. Since no one can ensure that their ideas match the wishes of the users, it is possible to customize the priorities in every system.
How this app is different from Abap ATC tcode ? Or is this app a replica of this tcode ?
Link to validation tutorial is not valid
Just checked it and the link is working fine. [Thomas Jung]
@@sapdevs Just checked and it is not valid. "Sorry, we couldn't find that tutorial"